Talk:Movie and Television Review and Classification Board

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Film: Southeast Asian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Southeast Asian cinema task force.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tide

please take note of the tv ad of TIDE which it says 1>2! whatever the explanation, it is very confusing to school children who are just starting their math lessons. my niece kept on arguing to her mom regarding the matter because she said that according to the tv commercial 1>2!thanks

Okay, so why are you complaining to Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.121.187.152 (talk) 09:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MTRCB doesn't classify ads. They're handled by the Ad Board. –H T D 07:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:General Patronage.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:General Patronage.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 30 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:01, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate edits

There have been a spate of edits changing the age information for the PG rating from "13" to "14". This is inconsistent with the Philippine government's own website and their Classification body (Ch.4, Section 1B) which state "Viewers below thirteen (13) years old must be accompanied by a parent or supervising adult when admitted into a “PG” film." I appreciate that classifications can change, but I find it unlikely in this case given that the source is the government's own site. Please do not change the age again without providing a source. Betty Logan (talk) 18:50, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rating icons?

When you normally go in to a movie theater in the Philippines, you can see a particular rating icon for a movie by the board. The rating icons look like rectangular boxes, which look like filmstrips, with the rating indicator and color (G (green), PG (blue), R-13 (yellow), R-16 (orange), and R-18 (red)). The MTRCB started showing them since early 2013. SuperArticleGuy (talk) 07:26, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism?

Assuming that there are sources to back it up, I think there should be a section on how the board met criticism for its practices and how they give ratings to media, like when they reluctantly gave a PG-13 to Passion of the Christ yet banned works that gained notoriety for graphic or violent content. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Movie and Television Review and Classification Board. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111017220040/http://mb.com.ph/node/336837/revi to http://mb.com.ph/node/336837/revi

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]