User talk:NasssaNser
| This is NasssaNser's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
| vn-4 | This user talk page has been vandalised 4 times. |
WikiProjects
|
 | |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #36 |
2024 Kansas City parade shooting
[edit]Instead of closing the move discussion here, should we not vote on a new title? --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe. I am not familiar with WP:RMCI, though. Maybe we can request a third opinion here. NasssaNsertalk 14:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Somebody else opened a new move request, so yes, we are probably voting on a new title here. I have no objections to that. NasssaNsertalk 15:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I closed the move discussion, not in the direction you wanted, but hopefully my reasoning is understandable, Tom B (talk) 23:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Tpbradbury: To quote another discussion I've opened regarding WP:COMMONNAME:
Supporters do assert that WP:COMMONNAME does not explicitly support the current title, as it requires a clear consensus of reliable sources to support any given title. They are correct to say that no such consensus exists.
I believe the interpretationdeparture from (WP:COMMONNAME) requires strong evidence/argument
is flawed, as COMMONNAME explicitly encourages editors to consider WP:CRITERIA directly (which may result in titles uncommon in reliable sources or newly-coined WP:NDESC titles) on the lack of a clear common name as asserted in said discussion. - That said, the no consensus result seems good as the current situation makes the chance of any relevant RM passing pretty slim. NasssaNser 15:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- COMMONNAME says, WP "generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable, English-language sources) as such names will usually best fit the five criteria..." You say you've opened a discussion but not where it is i couldn't see in on the article talk page or the common name talkpage? Tom B (talk) 15:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oh wait I worded stuff wrongly, that's the close post of the 23 January RM. NasssaNser 00:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- COMMONNAME says, WP "generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable, English-language sources) as such names will usually best fit the five criteria..." You say you've opened a discussion but not where it is i couldn't see in on the article talk page or the common name talkpage? Tom B (talk) 15:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)