User talk:Phoenix7777

Orbital Visualization Software

Hi Phoenix, I was very impressed by your visualizations and was interested to know what software you're using. Pengooose (talk) 05:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Pengooose[reply]

Thanks for adding the visualizations to the Janus page! Nrl103 (talk) 16:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to know about the software. Is it self-made or is it a tool published by one of the space agencies? Thank you for your visualisations! Erentar2002 (talk) 13:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add mine to the queries list. Seems like they doesn't want us to know, but that's okay. Footy2000♡; 16:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that he has an ad-hoc tool that he slightly reworks for each animation. I have tried to create a generic tool and I can tell you that it is not very easy - you can try mine from https://github.com/mmomtchev/orbitron

Mmom (talk) Mmom (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F5/EF5 tornado map

I would like to suggest some a slight change to the map you recently added to List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes. The title at the top of the map should be changed from "EF5 Tornado 1950-2019" to "U.S. F5 and EF5 Tornadoes, 1950-2019" since tornadoes prior to 2007 were rated on the Fujita scale rather than the Enhanced Fujita scale, and because it does not show tornadoes from outside the U.S. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Similar changes should be made to the maps you added to List of North American tornadoes and tornado outbreaks, Tornadoes in the United States and Tornadoes of 2019. I'd make the changes myself, but I don't have access to the original files you used to make the maps. Also, is there a reason you excluded F0/EF0 tornadoes from the latter two maps? TornadoLGS (talk) 18:30, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TornadoLGS: Thank you for the suggestions. I updated the maps. Also I added EF0 which I failed to extract from CSV files.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 04:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Horizons batch data url

Hello Phoenix7777, I see you added a Horizons batch data url to 2020 QG showing the orbit change. Do you know how to do that for the Horizons geocentric distance of 2014 MV67 for the date of 2022-03-22 with Table Settings of 20,39? Then batch URL could be properly archived at web.archive.org. Thank you. -- Kheider (talk) 13:07, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kheider: The requested url is as follows: (See HORIZONS Batch-Interface)

https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons_batch.cgi?batch=1&COMMAND='2014+MV67'&MAKE_EPHEM='YES'&TABLE_TYPE='OBSERVER'&START_TIME='2022-1-1'&STOP_TIME='2022-12-31'&STEP_SIZE='1%20days'&QUANTITIES='20,39'&CSV_FORMAT='YES'&CENTER='500'&REF_PLANE='Ecliptic'&REF_SYSTEM='J2000'&OUT_UNITS='AU-D'&VEC_TABLE='1'&OBJ_DATA='NO

You can change START_TIME, STOP_TIME and STEP_SIZE as you wish. According to the result, the date of close approach in 2022 seems August 22.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 21:25, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I think this short URL does the job. -- Kheider (talk) 00:35, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COVID-19 pandemic data

Hi. I noticed that this template is already being updated by TolBot. However, this template is still being updated manually. Interest in the topic area has already decreased, but fewer editors are updating more countries. Doing manual updates has already become useless because the difference between the numbers is insignificantly small. As a solution, Tol is planning to introduce automated updates by letting TolBot do the updates once every day. The necessary data is already centralised here. Would you support the implementation of automated updates? Also, can this idea convince other editors that doing manual updates "on time" is no longer necessary? LSGH (talk) (contributions) 01:26, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LSGH: There is already [[Template:COVID-19 data]] which is being updated by TolBot. So it is relatively easy to create [[Template:COVID-19 pandemic data]] by removing vaccine columns. Problems is as discussed at [[User talk:Tol/Archives/2021/September#COVID-19 pandemic data]], 1. "recoveries column" can be removed. 2. Daily update is acceptable. I personally think the recoveries column is unnecessary and Our World in Data also thinks so. As for daily update, three recent editors User:NickBerlin87, User:Carbonitrous and User:Shellwood's opinions are valuable. Anyway, I have no experience in Lua, so User:Tol's contribution is necessary.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many countries and media organisations do not report recoveries, so they can be removed. Tol said that he could put in those numbers, but that might still require manual editing. TolBot does updates once every day, and that should suffice. Letting the bot do the editing means that manual updates will no longer be needed. Perhaps we can also ask for the opinion of other editors who are active in the topic area? LSGH (talk) (contributions) 03:11, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If I try to seek consensus for the change, can I follow how this discussion was done? Should I use a more formal process? LSGH (talk) (contributions) 04:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you

Can you translate Korea? :) ShineyMoon (talk) 08:29, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orbit visualization software

What software do you use to visualize the orbits of Solar System bodies? Anonymous7002 (talk) 15:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What are the x and y directions?

Hi. I can't figure out what the horizontal and vertical coordinates are in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Animation_of_2016_HO3_orbit_around_Earth_2000-2300.gif Can you help me? Please Ping me. Eric Kvaalen (talk) 19:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Phoenix7777: Can you please answer me? Eric Kvaalen (talk) 07:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

James Webb Telescope Animation

@Phoenix7777: Hi. I was very impressed by your James Webb Telescope animation for the orbit relative to the Earth and Sun. I tried to recreate it using NASA's Horizons System data for JWST. But somehow I am not getting the same plot as you. Specifically, the L2 Halo orbit with respect to the Earth bends itself in the middle of the ellipse and creates somewhat of a V-shaped orbit. Do you know the cause of this? And, perhaps would it be fine if you could share your source code? Thanks.

Tomodrone (talk) 01:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The halo orbit appears round only in a rotating frame of reference. If you get a horseshoe, this is normal, this is how it should be if you are using a celestial frame of reference. Mmom (talk) Mmom (talk) 21:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P/2019 LD2

If you have the time, is an animation of the comet's orbit possible? Its orbital evolution is harder to visualize without it. Thanks! 68.96.105.31 (talk) 22:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done[1]―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 00:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 68.96.105.31 (talk) 17:24, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flammulina filiformis & Flammulina velutipes

Could you check the 2 wikidata instances? I'm not expert of plant but I think after you move the page there is some mismatch. Thanks, Andyrom75 (talk) 14:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MLCommons

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MLCommons, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 17:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Nobel laureates from the European Union

The article List of Nobel laureates from the European Union has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This list is not really necessary, already covered by List of Nobel laureates by country. In addition the definition of "List of Nobel laureates from the European Union" is very debatable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sungodtemple (talk) 01:49, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Nobel laureates from the European Union moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Nobel laureates from the European Union, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Protest Republic" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Protest Republic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#Protest Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Korea discount" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Korea discount and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#Korea discount until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Kimchi Temper" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kimchi Temper and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#Kimchi Temper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:COVAX-AMC donors

Template:COVAX-AMC donors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Nobel laureates from the European Union

Hello, Phoenix7777. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Nobel laureates from the European Union, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Nobel laureates from the European Union

Hello, Phoenix7777. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Nobel laureates from the European Union".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of IMF ranked countries by GDP

The article List of IMF ranked countries by GDP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by other lists at Lists of countries by GDP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Curious

Hello, I really loved your animations of spacecraft orbital maneuvers. I was just to know which software do you use to create those? Footy2000♡; 16:28, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Annual discharge of tritium from nuclear facilities in South Korea

Template:Annual discharge of tritium from nuclear facilities in South Korea has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kihei fires

I don't know how committed you are to expanding this, but there were anywhere from two to three evacuations in Kihei. One in Ohukai, another in Maui Meadows, and then a third one, which I believe was Kaiwahine Village. The first two should be easy to verify, but I don't think the Kaiwahine evac went through the official system, or it may have been part of the Ohukai evac, I'm not sure. But the Ohukai and Maui Meadows evac can be confirmed as those alerts were official from the County (or emergency management, or whatever). Viriditas (talk) 11:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Viriditas: Thank you for your concern about my edit. I edited many wildfire articles based on the burned area. In the 2023 Hawaii wildfires, Kihei is the largest wildfire in terms of acres burned. So I edited it to an independent section.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 12:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not concerned with your edits. You are doing good. I was talking about expanding the content, but no worries, I can talk about the burned area instead. Are you sure Kihei is the largest wildfire in terms of acres burned? I think there might be an issue with the definitions here. Do you mean Upcountry Maui above Kihei? In any case, what are the numbers? I looked at your map and while I'm sure the model is based on a particular date, it doesn't reflect the location of the actual fires. In any case, you have me interested. How many acres burned in Kihei? Viriditas (talk) 12:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Viriditas: I am sorry, I don't know the burned areas of any wildfires in Maui. I usually use National Interagency Fire Center to create perimeters for wildfires. However they are not interested in the fires in Maui. So I used Fire Information for Resource Management System. See c:User talk:Phoenix7777#A Little Help With A Map_2.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 12:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think we are both misunderstanding each other. Choegoyeyo. Viriditas (talk) 12:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Phoenix7777. Thank you for your work on Chŏllima 1. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spitzer Space Telescope animation

Hello, I noticed you added this animation a few years ago.

Spitzer orbits the Sun somewhat "behind" Earth, so I cannot see how this spiral around Earth could possibly represent Spitzer's Earth-trailing solar orbit.

Icek~enwiki (talk) 17:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Icek~enwiki: When a spacecraft is trailing the Earth's orbit, it is seen circling around the Earth once a year. If the spacecraft's orbital period around the Sun is longer than the Earth, its orbit around the Earth becomes a spiral orbit.

See User talk:Phoenix7777/Archive1#Kepler orbit?, Kepler space telescope#Orbit and orientation and other versions File:Kepler-earthdirection 2009-2019.png.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 22:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This is indeed an unusual perspective, as the Sun moves around Earth in this picture. Icek~enwiki (talk) 09:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great animations of Japan's SLIM mission

I really liked your two animation gifs of the SLIM mission of 2024. They are making the article page come to life. Excellent work. Regards, 75.155.114.4 (talk) 17:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, those animations are awesome to watch. Many thanks! (And thank you for your other uploads too!)

--Stux (talk) 12:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Puberulic acid

Puberulic acid, which you made into a redirect, is in the news. Please create a stub for it, or request the deletion of the redirect so that users aren't confused and an editor might create the article. Please refrain from creating redirects on topics that could conceivably turned into articles; such redirects hamper the building of the encyclopedia. Abductive (reasoning) 19:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voyager speed & distance from Sun

Hi, the graphic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1#/media/File:Voyager_speed_and_distance_from_Sun.svg, has the Heliopause & Termination Shock (green lines) seemingly anchored to the right axis (speed), suggest anchoring them to the AU distance axis (left). Your thoughts? thx, IB 71.143.144.218 (talk) 21:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@71.143.144.218: Improved a bit.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 23:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

Thanks for your quick work on the Aricell battery factory fire. If I may offer just one suggestion, it is to follow the MOS:SECTIONORDER guideline regarding the Coord template. It seems that certain mobile operating systems can't handle the Coord template being near the top of the article, which is why MOS:SECTIONORDER wants it placed either in the Infobox, or just above the Categories at the bottom of the page. Thanks, Abductive (reasoning) 11:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added the Coord template in the infobox.[2] User:Celjski Grad added another Coord template to the top of the infobox.[3]―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 21:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry. Take a look at the infobox of the article as it stands now to see the way it set up. Abductive (reasoning) 21:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beijing bikini

A tag has been placed on Beijing bikini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

I'd like to make a way for a draft I'd like to move to article space

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mooonswimmer 23:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	thank you for making all of your invaluable orbit animations ;) Daisytheduck (talk) 02:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Earth's rotation in orbit animations

Hi, thank you for your orbit animations. Would you consider showing Earth's rotation in the Earth-centered inertial plots, please? It'd help readers understand the apparent twists in the orbits when represented in a frame co-rotating with Earth. I imagine showing the Earth-centered Earth-fixed Cartesian axes. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 04:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are referring to animations of Quasi-Zenith Satellite System#Satellites. I think you know the coordinate systems very well and It is very resonable request. However, very technical reason, it is difficult to impliment your request to my program. I will put your request for future improvement of my program. In other case, there is a quite naive question that Sun never orbit around Earth by User:Qwerty0 and User:Kiwiz1338 who have no knowledge of the coordinates systems and believe Heliocentrism. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No it was understood clearly it was Earth centered and was my perception after looking at the NASA Small-Body Database Lookup orbital viewer and couldn't see the relationship. Irrespective, maybe an animation seen from the ecliptic plane would be cool as so far it's only top down. Would add some encyclopedic value which is what we should strive for. Thank you for your animations. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 11:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I asked why there's an animation showing the Sun orbiting the Earth because that's what it appears to show. The animation doesn't label its reference frame. Most assume that if an animation doesn't specify, then the default is showing a Sun-centered inertial reference frame. Most readers aren't even aware of any other reference frame. That's what made this particularly confusing. Even if it was labeled, I don't think this odd reference frame is useful in 99% of articles. Qwerty0 (talk) 16:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for considering the suggestion. Maybe a more practical alternative would be to show a geostationary orbit in the same

plot as another orbit (e.g., Tundra-type orbit). It'd help to illustrate Earth's rotation. fgnievinski (talk) 00:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]