User talk:Kkm010

RETIRED PERMANENTLY

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of August 2017 due to certain personal issues.

October 2014

You were only just warned about adding Google Finance search results and your own original research to articles. You were warned by multiple editors at WP:ANI no less, and then you were blocked for it. You've returned from your block only to start the same thing again at Qualcomm. Stop now or you'll be blocked again. St★lwart¹¹¹ 22:50, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reliance Industries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

At the Administrators' Noticeboard again

I've run out of options. You were blocked for adding original research to articles and for edit-warring to keep it there. You committed to no longer adding the same original research to corporate articles. I reverted two instances of exactly that only days after you came back from your block. There are now more examples in your contribution history, so...

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. St★lwart¹¹¹ 10:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello Kkm010. Unless you respond to the complaint at WP:ANI and agree to change your approach, it seems possible you will be blocked for disruptive editing. It is not correct to add data to articles said to be from an annual report when you simply scrounged the information from Google. If you claim to use the annual report, you must actually see an annual report as published by the company. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Bharatiya Janata Party

Hello, I found that your edits to the Bharatiya Janata Party to be disruptive with misleading edit summaries. You have changed the ideological position of the party from right-wing to centre-right without discussion, and without checking the prior talk page discussion. In future, please participate in the talk page discussions instead of making disruptive changes to articles. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:08, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry brother.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 11:54, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Religion=Islam

Per WP:BLP please don't add this fact without reliable sources, even if it seems natural. Materialscientist (talk) 05:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

• Kkm010, this is already been explained to you more than once and in fine detail here. You responded to Begoon's comment and then later blanked the page, which signifies you have read the message. Disregarding the specific requirements for inclusion of religion or ethnicity in infoboxes despite multiple requests from several editors is a violation of WP:BLP and if it continues you will be blocked from editing. If you don't think you are able to abide by the requirements for sourcing, self-identification and notability with regard to religion please stay away from adding/changing or editing the information altogether. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ponyo after Materialscientist I am no longer adding any religion or ethnicity without proper source. I have clearly understood Materialscientist point and would abide by rules.Thank You--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

You mean just like you said you would do three weeks ago in response to Begoon's concerns here? Do you understand why others are frustrated by your replies that appear to mean little when it comes to practice?--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WWE. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Begoon ^talk 13:44, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

I have explained so many times that in "Key People" section only chairman & ceo should be mentioned, but, User:Torrian2014 still adding entire executives name. If you look other company articles no where list all executives name are put. Please try to understand the situation.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

I understand the situation fully. You don't seem to. You've "explained" nothing, anywhere. You have an opinion, unsupported by the documentation, and disputed by other users. If you think your opinion trumps that of other editors, then start a discussion about it, in the proper place, not here.

Do not edit war. The "situation" is that you are a hair's breadth from being indefinitely blocked for pushing your opinion and refusing to discuss your edits. You have the power to change that. If you want to keep editing here I suggest you do so, immediately. Talk to people when your edits are disputed and stop behaving like a bull in a china shop.

Articles have talk pages for a reason - use them when you are reverted. Stop edit warring, and stop playing dumb when you are challenged. I don't think there will be any more warnings. I think an indefinite block will be the next step, and soon. You should also go back, right now, and fix any bad "religion/ethnicity" edits you made which haven't been fixed for you. That might help to head off a block. That is all I have to say here, apart from: "pick up your game, now". Begoon ^talk 16:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Begoon, I understand your point and would follow your order. What do you think is appropriate for the WWE article especially in the "Key People" section. I believe only chairman & ceo should be mentioned rather than entire list of executives.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:14, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

See what I said above. Start a discussion in the proper place. The article talkpage, or the talkpage of the infobox. Not here. Really, your inability/unwillingness to listen to what was said is close to legendary here. My patience is at an end with your self-centered editing, feigned ignorance, and reluctance to collaborate. Did you go back and fix the "religion/ethnicity" edits you made, yet? Any one of them? Step out of line one more time and I'll be fully behind the inevitable move to have you blocked indefinitely. Or surprise us all - fix your problems and edit as part of the community and within policy. Your choice. Begoon ^talk 17:08, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Block me indefinitely brother. You are my inspiration.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 04:31, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Nah - not me. I can't do that, and I hardly come here anyway. But your editing style is now exposed for what it is, and you are watched by many others - so my work is done here. Have fun. Begoon ^talk 14:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

I noticed that you waited until you thought nobody was looking, then mostly undid the edit anyway, with a deceptive edit summary of "wikilinks". Your sneaky POV editing style is a disgrace, your respect for consensus and discussion is non existent, and I'm glad of only one thing - I don't actively edit here any more, so I don't need to witness the slow destruction of a place I once cared about by this sort of crap. Enjoy yourself. It used to mean something to edit here, but it's now apparent that your kind of editing will prevail. Good luck. You deserve what you inherit. You also deserve to understand that - but one can't have everything... Begoon ^talk 18:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Recent AN/I discussion

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Hi. I've closed this AN/I discussion regarding some of your recent edits. The closing comments are here, and they explain the context for the Discretionary Sanctions warning that appears above. Happy to discuss if required. -- Euryalus (talk) 12:01, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload unencyclopedic images, as you did at Bharatiya Janata Party, you may be blocked from editing. Shrikanthv (talk) 14:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

WP:3RR

Also familarise with the three revert rule , your talk archieves to be filled with them Shrikanthv (talk) 14:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

I'll second that. Your edit warring mentality is atrocious. Shrikanthv used the wrong process to nominate the image, so I fixed that for them. Honestly, if you continue edit warring like this, your days editing here are numbered, And you are now watched, closely, by many people. Begoon ^talk

Nomination of File:Flag of the Bharatiya Janata Party.png for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article File:Flag of the Bharatiya Janata Party.png is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/File:Flag of the Bharatiya Janata Party.png until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shrikanthv (talk) 15:02, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of the Bharatiya Janata Party.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of the Bharatiya Janata Party.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Begoon ^talk 17:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Seriously, you listed the source of this "political logo" as http://www.alcostores.com/ ? A shopping coupon site? I'm now convinced you do not take anything here seriously. Begoon ^talk 21:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Vendetta?

You may wish to consider whether accusing editors who are merely providing other editors with relevant context and historical links of "pursuing a vendetta", is a good idea. Here's a clue - it's not. Personally attack me just one more time like that and I'll stop being nice. I've tried hard so far. That was your last warning. Cheers. Begoon ^talk 17:58, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Join WikiProject Microsoft!

Why don't you join WikiProject Microsoft?

It seems that you have been editing Microsoft related articles, so why don't you consider joining WikiProject Microsoft, not to be confused with WikiProject Microsoft Windows. WikiProject Microsoft is a group of editors who are willing to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Microsoft, its technologies, Web based sites and applications, its important people, and share interests regarding Microsoft. This WikiProject is in the process of being Revived and is welcoming any and all editors who are willing to help out with the process. Add your name to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Participants and/or add the userbox {{Template:User WikiProject Microsoft}}. Thanks! STJMLCC (talk) 18:10, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Microsoft!

Hello new WikiProject Microsoft Member, welcome to WikiProject Microsoft! We aim to create and improve articles related to Microsoft. Feel free to post ideas at the general forums and look at our "how to help" list for things to do. Thank you for joining WikiProject Microsoft, Happy editing!

Orphaned non-free image File:Malayala Manorama Front Page.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Malayala Manorama Front Page.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:03, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

File:C Sharp wordmark.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:C Sharp wordmark.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Microsoft Outreach Newsletter Issue 5, December 2014

WikiProject Microsoft Newsletter - Want to opt-out? Issue 05 – December 2014

Project News in bullet points. Our WikiProject is in the process of being Revived and is welcoming any and all editors who are willing to help out with the process. Please use the template {{subst:JOINWPMICROSOFT}} instead of {{subst:Microsoftinvite}} ~~~~. Note that {{subst:JOINWPMICROSOFT}} signs your post automatically. Latest collaboration article is Microsoft. See below- rewards are at stake! Current Collaboration Article The current article we are working to improve is Microsoft, and the aim for this page is to expand it, revert vandalisim, and verify certain information that has become inaccurate over the years. The editor that has the most edits and improvements to this page will earn a barnstar of their choice. The second and third person will also earn one, but one that is pre decided. Member News Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Participants Lack of members! Any editor who is working significantly on Microsoft-related topics should be invited with {{subst:JOINWPMICROSOFT}} ~~~~ New members are to be welcomed with {{subst:Microsoftwel}} ~~~~ From the Editor Help is needed for the job of putting future Newsletters together. The present incumbent is finding it difficult to reflect the breadth of the Project, focusing on much the same individuals and articles each month, and has decided to beg for contributions from other individuals. Interested persons need only start working on next months issue to qualify. It really is that simple! If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing! Editing This Newsletter Edit This Page At Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Outreach/Newsletter Contributors to this Issue User: STJMLCC (Lead Editor)

To-do List Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Peter Klein (CFO) Assess : Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Microsoft articles and Category:Unknown-importance Microsoft articles. Be sure to add the articles to any appropriate projects. Cleanup : clean-up listing for Microsoft Copyedit : Wikipedia articles needing copy edit in Microsoft Expand : Articles to be expanded in Microsoft Merge : Articles to be merged in Microsoft NPOV : NPOV disputes in Microsoft Orphans : Orphaned articles in Microsoft Update : Articles currently with templates to be classified. Other : * Tag the talk pages of Microsoft-related articles with the {{WikiProject Microsoft}} banner. Help out with articles placed in Category:Microsoft articles needing attention

Thanks to Wikipedia: WikiProject The Beatles for the design.

Orphaned non-free image File:Fanshawe College Logo 1.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fanshawe College Logo 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Microsoft

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Microsoft for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (tell) @ 17:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

WP:CANVASSING

Some essential requirements

1. "Notifications must be polite, ... with a neutral title"
2. "The audience must not be selected on the basis of their opinions"
3. "Campaigning is an attempt to sway the person reading the message, conveyed through the use of tone, wording, or intent. While this may be appropriate as part of a specific individual discussion, it is inappropriate to canvass with such messages."
4. "It is good practice to leave a note at the discussion itself about notifications which have been made, particularly if made to individual users"

As this is a warning, I trust you will correct your messages posted on talk pages of the other users, and instead focus on locating reliable sources. Gollymemolly (talk) 04:57, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Cowper2 (talk) 18:26, 24 December 2014 (UTC)I am new to the forum and do not know enough technically about wikipedia editing and talk forums to contribute views on invite by kkm010. Find it too difficult to learn. So, please excuse my silence Cowper2 (talk) 18:26, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Microsoft Outreach Newsletter Issue 01, January 2015

WikiProject Microsoft Newsletter - Want To Opt-Out? Issue 01, Febuary 2015

Project News! Please use the template {{subst:JOINWPMICROSOFT}} to invite users to our WikiProject. Note that {{subst:JOINWPMICROSOFT}} signs your post automatically. Once a user has joined our WikiProject please welcome them by using the template {{subst:Microsoftwel}}. We need more members! Invite as many editors (who are working on Microsoft related articles) as you can! Use the above mentioned invitational template on the user talk pages of possbile members! The current article we are working to improve is Microsoft Word, and the aim for this page is to expand it, revert vandalism, and verify certain information that has become inaccurate over the years, as well as gaining more attention as any and all changes have been either unconstructive or by a singular user. The editor that has the most edits and improvements to this page will earn a barnstar of their choice. The second and third person will also earn one, but one that is pre-decided. Member News Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Participants Lack of members! Any editor who is working significantly on Microsoft-related topics should be invited with {{subst:JOINWPMICROSOFT}} New members are to be welcomed with {{subst:Microsoftwel}} We had a great 2014! 2014 Was a great year let's make 2015 an even greater year! We need to pick up speed and get going! 2015 Will be our come-back year! From the Editor Help is needed for the job of putting future Newsletters together. Interested persons need only start working on next month's issue to qualify. It really is that simple! If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of WikiProject Microsoft. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing! Editing This Newsletter Edit This Page At Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Outreach/Newsletter Contributors to this Issue STJMLCC (Lead Editor)

To-do List Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Peter Klein (CFO) Assess : Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Microsoft articles and Category:Unknown-importance Microsoft articles. Be sure to add the articles to any appropriate projects. Cleanup : clean-up listing for Microsoft Copyedit : Wikipedia articles needing copy edit in Microsoft Expand : Articles to be expanded in Microsoft Merge : Articles to be merged in Microsoft NPOV : NPOV disputes in Microsoft Orphans : Orphaned articles in Microsoft Update : Articles currently with templates to be classified. Other : * Tag the talk pages of Microsoft-related articles with the {{WikiProject Microsoft}} banner. Help out with articles placed in Category:Microsoft articles needing attention

Thanks to Wikipedia: WikiProject The Beatles for the design.

Mass Message Delivery by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year Kkm010!

Happy New Year!

Kkm010,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. --L235 (talk) Ping when replying 06:07, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

BAPS Infobox

You recently made some changes to the BAPS infobox without giving any reasonable edit message - except for a simple "update" message. Could you please explain your edits? You added coordinates to the infobox. It would be appropriate to add geocoordinates for an article that was say a physical locality - but for an organization? As per reducing the size of the logo, I am sticking with the original size. See Art of Living Foundatoin and Divine Life Society to see how the logo image has been made to fit the infobox. The Art of Living Foundatoin, has a wider logo - just the right dimension/size for the infobox! The BAPS logo is a square - and thus appeals aesthetically if it fits the estate space available. If you think otherwise, leave me a message on my talk page. Cheers! Kapil.xerox (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

OK, no problem. I'm glad that you made necessary changes which are important.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:29, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

RfC

As one of the largest active contributors to the BJP page, a vote here would be appreciated, in either direction. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 10:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

I think your comment was slightly moved. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bharatiya_Janata_Party&diff=650218654&oldid=650151480 Fundarise (talk) 12:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

I did indeed move Kkm010's vote, because it seemed to me that it had accidentally been indented too much, and this would mess with the bot that counts votes. If I inadvertently changed the meaning of your comment, then I apologize; feel free to revert me. Vanamonde93 (talk) 13:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Whatever u feel is right just do that. Thanks--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 14:04, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Removal of Forum Garbage from Talk Page

Hi User:Kkm010, I saw you added a "forum" tag on the BAPS Talk page (your edit link is here). I agree, there is a lot of forum info on the talk page that is irrelevant for the article. Does Wikipedia provide a way to clean that up? Let me know. Cheers! Kapil.xerox (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 05:12, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Alright I'll let u know.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 11:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Durga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Ganesha

Can you please discuss the issue on the talk-page? If you review the archives and the FAC page, you'll note that the lede has been extensively discussed and reviewed. So, if changes need to be made it would be good to refine the content and language, so as to not introduce, redundant, unsourced, or undue information right at the start. Abecedare (talk) 17:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jindal Group

A tag has been placed on Jindal Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

self promotion,No independent Sources, not notable org,WP:AUD, Wikipedia:PROMOTION,References Not improved since 2008,and Not Proper reliable references

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. चंद्र शेखर (talk) 05:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Thakur Sitaramdas Omkarnath

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thakur_Sitaramdas_Omkarnath

This page was started by Abhishek Bose. Ample external links were given, along with Book refernces, website links, magazine issues. Initially, warning was given that too many links are not recommended. Then, external links were reduced. Now, the warning message wants more 'reliable, secondary sources about the topic'? I am also trying to add information to this page. please guide us what is to be done exactly. ~ ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkaghosh6 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Reliance Industries may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | assets = {{profit}} US$ 79.002 billion (2015<ref name=10K/>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

British English? Not in all cases

Please don't add {{British English}} tags to article talk pages as you have been doing, without examining the history of articles. You are making errors in some cases (for example Muhammad, with its earliest identifiable versions using American spelling). Rather than go through all your contributions and revert them wholesale, I will leave it up to you to correct them. Thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:23, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 19:42, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome, but you did not correct your own errors. I had to do that for you on computer operator, software engineer, programmer, software developer, and information technology. When an article subject is not identifiable to a nationality or geography, it is incumbent on you to examine the early edit history for evidence supporting a language tag. Failing to do this is disruptive and causes work for others. When in doubt, move on to another article. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:01, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

I saw you reverted my edits on all those articles. And after checking I put the tag on the articles. I take your advice, if unable you figure out the language issue, I will definitely move on to another article. But, most articles I saw tagging had been done by some other editors. I need your help on Albert Einstein article, could u pls tell me whether it is written in American English or British English. Another question what is the difference between "British English" and "EngvarB". Thanks--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:43, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Albert Einstein is one of those subjects that is difficult to determine, because Einstein rose to prominence before he emigrated to the US, but he also lived out his life as a US citizen and made significant contributions during that time. Looking at the first revision of Albert Einstein available in the history, there's a small piece of evidence in the spelling of "visualizable", which is a more common spelling in the US ("visualisable" would be more common in the UK). Because the variety of English can't be determined from the subject matter, I would lean toward US English based on the earliest versions of the article.

As for the templates, {{British English}} is for talk pages that use British English, and {{EngvarB}} is for articles that use neither US nor Canadian English, but the variety of English cannot be determined (it can be British, Australian, Indian, Singaporean, or other non-North-American varieties). The template pages themselves have detailed descriptions of their purposes. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:26, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the information.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 14:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Today you have made numerous changes to templates on talk pages with the simple edit summary "Add" and often no edit summary at all. In one case you wrote "add" even though you removed. Please provide better explanation in your edit summaries about why you are making the changes. Bad edit summaries are misleading and rude to other editors. And your edits can be considered vandalism if they are not properly explained. Sundayclose (talk) 20:26, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

AGAIN, don't just describe your edits with the one word "fixes". Tell us why you are adding the templates. Did you just pick templates randomly??? Give a rationale for each one. Alternatively you can explain in a section on each edit page, but an edit summary is usually easier. You are not making minor changes. They require explanation. Please cooperate on this. If you can't cooperate your edits will simply be reverted and it might even be escalated to a sanction against you. Sundayclose (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Talk:Bipin Chandra Pal has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 19:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Sundayclose, have you ever read WP:DTR? Whatever their faults, Kkm has 8 times as many edits as you do; so a little less condescension would be helpful. Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm putting "British English" template those who are from U.K. or articles which are related to U.K. As far as "Indian English" is concern people who belong to India or articles related to India, I put that tag. It seems Sundayclose, you are new to Wikipedia, and doesn't know the clause very well, so please go though WP:DTR as mentioned by Vanamonde93. Moreover please revert those edits which you made otherwise I will have to do. Thanks--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 12:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Hindu

Hi, hope you don't mind, I've removed the Hindu infobox at Transcendental Meditation. It's true there are some sources saying TM is related to Hinduism, but there are others that say it is a new religious movement, and still more that say it is non-religious. So in the lead this content has been agreed: Varying views on whether the technique is religious or non-religious have been expressed; and in the body of the article The Transcendental Meditation technique has been described as both religious and non religious, as an aspect of a new religious movement, as rooted in Hinduism, and as a non-religious practice for self-development. Policy here is WP:UNDUE. Thanks! Spicemix (talk) 23:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

No problem.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 03:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Indiaplaza logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indiaplaza logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lokmat Front Page.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lokmat Front Page.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Indian people

Please don't widen the infobox, I have added another row of images instead. It will simply look cluttered, it's unnecessary and It's not a gallery for every Indian person. I have worked on creating and sourcing this page for days now and there is still a lot to be done, especially in history section and contributions. Let's wait until the page is done sourcing before we discuss about infobox. 117.192.201.56 (talk) 18:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

These issues are best decided through discussion. Perhaps one of you can open a talk page discussion so that others can provide their input? Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 23:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

I told him but he is not listening.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, sorry for late replay, I only read this message now. I have made a collage of Indian people with advice from User:Human3015, similar to the ones found on French people and Italian people page, collage is better representative of nationality than individual ethic infobox which is found on ethnic groups pages rather than nationality. Do let me know if you want me to add anyone to collage. I would also like to point out again that I have worked on sourcing and editing this page all by myself, no one so far has been helped extend the article so it would be great if we could discuss and work together. :) 59.93.72.203 (talk) 08:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Agree with your point of view. See French people, Germans, Italian people or Spaniards.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 12:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice, the German peoples page has very simple and organized layout. I will work towards creating and organizing the page similar to that. However, various pages such as Indian literature, Indian philosophy and Indian Architecture pages need to be expanded, sourced and updated before we create those topics on Indian people page so it will take some time. :) 59.93.74.83 (talk) 13:16, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Worldwide population in infobox

Regarding this and similar edits... The "worldwide" is implied - see Template:Infobox_ethnic_group#Parameters - so there's no need to state it explicitly. If you feel it sufficiently important to change multiple instances, you should consider raising the matter on the talk page of the template, to get the template changed, rather than changing each usage of the template. Mitch Ames (talk) 05:56, 5 December 2015 (UTC) Also the bold formatting is contrary to MOS:BOLD. Mitch Ames (talk) 05:57, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

These articles are not written in Indian English

I am wondering why do you keep adding the "Indian English" templates on a number of articles (as you did here link1 and here link2) even when these articles are written in American English? Are you doing this to add an Indian banner/flag at the top? I will remove those templates unless you have a valid reason to enforce that these articles be written in "Indian English". FYI I write in American English. Thanks Kapil.xerox (talk) 04:08, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

@Kapil.xerox: Read MOS:TIES.--Human3015^TALK  15:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Read. Thanks for correcting me.--kkm010 ^{talk to me} 04:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Human3015 for clarifying that. I don't understand why Wikipedia has such a rule. May be it is expected if a person hails from Y then most of the edits will originate from editors living at location Y. I hope you are not an alien or some humanoid from the future helping us humans! Kapil.xerox (talk) 05:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Flag images in articles about ethnic groups

Hello. Please stop your wholesale addition of flag images to articles like Germans, Russians and others, those articles are about ethnic groups living in several different countries, not about citizens in general of Germany, Russia and so on. Thomas.W ^talk 14:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 11 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the 21st Century Fox page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the List of the largest information technology companies page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zee Business.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zee Business.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Goldman Sachs

Hi, I have removed the numeric changes you made to Goldman Sachs as they seemed like some kind of experiment. If you think I am wrong, please let me know. Wildfowl (talk) 01:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

English templates Comment Suggestion

It hardly matters if talk page comments are done in American-English, English-English, Australian-English, Indian-English, or whatever English the editor wishes to use. We all understand English, no matter where we come from. Putting that template on talk pages only clutters the talk pages. I ask that you put your efforts to more productive uses. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 05:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

I think that template matter as it refers which English language the article is written American / British / Australian or Canadian. Moreover putting one template hardly clutters an article talk page. --kkm010 ^{talk to me} 05:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahindra Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defense. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Finance figures at Ford Motor Company

Thank you for your edits at Ford Motor Company. Unfortunately I had to revert them because the 2015 figures you supplied are different to the figures in the 2014 reference. However, these 2015 figures can be reinstated if you can also provide the 2015 reference that matches them. This is because facts in Wikipedia must be supported by references - otherwise we have no idea if the facts are real or if they have mistakes (intentional or not). Thanks.  Stepho  talk  01:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for adding that reference. I also added a second one that doesn't auto update.  Stepho  talk  05:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

List of the largest information technology companies

I made the changes to reflect the fact that HP is two different companies (legal entities) now (since 1 Nov 2015), and each on its own standing makes the list. It is not right to show them bunched together as one. HPE financial data is already public to which I had referenced, while that of HP Inc can be calculated until they are formally announced.Mvramesh99 (talk) 11:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

The reason I put both there data because HP Inc. has published both separate companies data together rather than individually. You can check their source. I'm sure from next year each companies will publish data individually.--kkm010 ^{talk to me} 14:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Bengal Legislative Assembly election, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left Front. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zee Business.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zee Business.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

SAP SE Infobox

Hi Kkm010, thank you for your edits to the SAP SE Infobox. I'd like to add/correct a few important figures. For 2015, the total revenue (IFRS) was 20,793M euros. Operating profit was 4,252M euros. Total assets was 41,390M euros. Total equity was 23,295M euros. Total employees are 76,986. Please have a look at SAP Key Facts: http://go.sap.com/integrated-reports/2015/en/performance/summaries/key-facts.html and Primary Consolidated Financial Statements: http://go.sap.com/integrated-reports/2015/en/performance/financial/primary-consolidated-financial-statements.html for verification of these 2015 numbers. Thank you! Harper70 (talk) 17:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Harper70

Mention the consolidated figure.--kkm010 ^{talk to me} 18:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Kkm010, I'm not entirely certain of what you need to make the corrections. Can you please elaborate? Thanks. Harper70 (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Harper70

I think the figures mentioned there are alright. No changes required. --kkm010 ^{talk to me} 15:14, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Kkm010, I've been in contact with our investor relations team, and there are still inaccuracies in the figures. The revenue number is fine. The operating income/profit is incorrect. It's 4,252 not 4,251B euros. I'm not certain if you're using profit before or after tax, but in either case, the number in the InfoBox is incorrect. It should be 3,056B euros. Total assets is correct. Total equity should be 23,295B euros. These are the definitive audited numbers for 2015, and have been filed with the SEC as well as in SAP's Form 20F. Finally, we should reference the SAP 2015 Annual Report, which contains all of these numbers: http://go.sap.com/docs/download/investors/2015/sap-2015-annual-report.pdf. The InfoBox currently references the 2014 report. Finally, the employee numbers are incorrect. If you go to the SAP Key Facts document: http://go.sap.com/integrated-reports/2015/en/performance/summaries/key-facts.html, you'll see our employee numbers have risen to 76,986. Thanks again for working on this. We appreciate it, but want to make sure the market has a clear, accurate understanding of SAP's financial performance in 2015. Harper70 (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)Harper70

Orphaned non-free image File:CNN-IBN 2010.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CNN-IBN 2010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Bengalis

Your edit at Bengalis has been reverted. Take it to the talk page if you're against the long standing inclusion of population numbers. Filpro (talk) 20:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Try to put the latest figures i'm not against those inclusion. --kkm010 ^{talk to me} 03:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Dainik Bhaskar cover page.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dainik Bhaskar cover page.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Subhas Chandra Bose may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the final struggle for independence were rampant by the end of 1945.{{sfn|Bayly|Harper|2007|p=2}}}}), was an [[Indian independence movement|Indian nationalist]] whose defiant patriotism made him a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hindustan Dainik cover 03-28-10.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hindustan Dainik cover 03-28-10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CNN-News18 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CNN-News18 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bengali renaissance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presidency University. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Do not edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bengalis. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Worldbruce (talk) 20:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Stop

Any further blp violations and you will be blocked. THis is not the first time you're doing this. —SpacemanSpiff 05:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. WP:BDP violations and editing against consensus. You appear to have a history of Islam-related disruptive editing. Stop EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:07, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Seriously, stop. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

• You have to listen to what others are telling you, you have a wide variety of disruptive edits now and are displaying a serious lack of competence. If you continue to do this your editing privileges will be revoked, as was made clear to you during your last WP:ANI visit. —SpacemanSpiff 06:32, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ericsson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multinational. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Spelling and date format on Arabs article

Hi there! I noticed your edits that changed the date format, and the tag that incorrectly mentions that the article is written in British English on the Arabs article (when it's not), please check out WP:DATERET, and WP:RETAIN, in order for the original format to change there has to be a consensus; if you wish to start the discussion, please do so on the talk page. George Al-Shami (talk) 04:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Infobox Indian political party. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 15:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

• I have now extended your block to another two weeks as you've been evading your block via IPs. If you continue to do this then your next block will be of longer duration, including the possibility of an indefinite block. Please stop this disruptive editing. —SpacemanSpiff 11:42, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

• I've now extended it to a month for further disruptive IP block evasion.—SpacemanSpiff 06:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dd bangla.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dd bangla.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruption through block evasion via multiple IPs. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 04:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EZTV screenshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EZTV screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kkm010. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LinkedIn (login,signup page).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LinkedIn (login,signup page).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NationalistCongressParty.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NationalistCongressParty.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:STAR Ananda 2010.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:STAR Ananda 2010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ET Now 2010.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ET Now 2010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Transcend.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Transcend.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:24 Ghanta 2010.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:24 Ghanta 2010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of the Bharatiya Janata Party.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of the Bharatiya Janata Party.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkm010, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

MBlaze Lightning ^talk 08:46, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lok Sabha TV 2010.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lok Sabha TV 2010.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dainik Jagran cover 03-28-10.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dainik Jagran cover 03-28-10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Statesman logo.png

The file File:Statesman logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:11, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HindustanTimes.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HindustanTimes.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

List of members of the Forbes 400 (2010) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of members of the Forbes 400 (2010). Since you had some involvement with the List of members of the Forbes 400 (2010) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Business Standard cover 03-28-10.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Business Standard cover 03-28-10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ramakrishna Emblem.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ramakrishna Emblem.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:News Time Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:News Time Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dainik Bhaskar cover page.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dainik Bhaskar cover page.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Financial Chronicle cover 06-28-11.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Financial Chronicle cover 06-28-11.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CNBC Awaaz 2010.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CNBC Awaaz 2010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CNBC Awaaz 2010.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CNBC Awaaz 2010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Mint (newspaper) logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mint (newspaper) logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mint (newspaper) logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mint (newspaper) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Economic Times cover 03-28-10.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Economic Times cover 03-28-10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sun Group logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sun Group logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ei Samay Sangbadpatra cover page.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ei Samay Sangbadpatra cover page.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Statesman cover 03-30-10.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Statesman cover 03-30-10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SangbadPratidinFront.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SangbadPratidinFront.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bhagwa Dhwaj.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bhagwa Dhwaj.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)