User talk:13aunihert
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Please discuss my alternative account Nomromex here.
13aunihert, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi 13aunihert! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC) |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi 13aunihert! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 09:49, Monday, June 27, 2016 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Unblock Request
[edit]13aunihert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I just realised my account had been blocked this morning when I logged in and upon further investigation discovered the reason for my block I believe is absurd. I understand that maybe my alternate account Nomromex might have caused an issue with sockpuppetry, but not in the manner stated on my user page. I decided to investigate the linked account Royer2356 and discovered it was blocked over 4 years ago. Can you please explain to me why I'm blocked, as this account isn't used abusively, which can be found in my contributions and neither is my alternate account. I'm not a sockpuppet of the user stated on my userpage and the strikingly different contributions show that. I sometimes use a public network in my place of study and may have left myself logged in by mistake. Can you explain to me what evidence you might have to link me to an account which was blocked over 4 years ago? 13aunihert (talk) 10:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 00:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Materialscientist:The user makes a point that this acxcount wasn't used the same way as the ones listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Royer2356/Archive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- That may be so, but the CheckUser evidence is completely unambiguous. —DoRD (talk) 00:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)