Talk:Atlanta Braves

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Atlanta Braves article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3

Atlanta Braves is currently a Other sports good article nominee. Nominated by Nemov (talk) at 16:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: Major League Baseball team in Atlanta, Georgia

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Georgia (U.S. state): Atlanta Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles

Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Atlanta task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Atlanta task force To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate Atlanta related articles from Unassessed Atlanta articles and Category:Unknown-importance Atlanta articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Atlanta articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Infobox : Atlanta articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Atlanta
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Atlanta
Stubs : Work on stubs in Category:Atlanta stubs.
Other : * Help out with articles placed in Category:Atlanta articles needing attention
- Add {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)|class=|importance=|atlanta=|atlanta-importance=}} project banner to Atlanta-related articles to talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get Atlanta into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

Baseball: Old-time Base Ball / Braves High‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Old-time Base Ball task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Atlanta Braves (assessed as Top-importance).

Article Size

The prose size of this article is 64kb which is getting a little too big. The most obvious area to summarize is the club's history. Some of what's included here could be moved to History of the Atlanta Braves. Seems like the biggest points to cover here would be origin, world championships, winning eras, and team moves? The general season by season stuff can be moved. Thoughts? Nemov (talk) 23:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:RECENTISM on the past 20 or so seasons (especially the last 10) is prime for a trimming, with material shifted to the individual season articles if its not there already. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I summarized the last 30 years changes and the article is a bit more manageable (around 50kb). Nemov (talk) 01:03, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uniforms for 2022 (& 2023)

The Braves are no longer wearing their cream alternative jerseys according to a report from May[1]. I see that @Silent Wind of Doom has updated the illustrations in the past, but at some point that needs to be updated on this article. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 11:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Braves have also added this to the rotation for the 2023 season.[2] Nemov (talk) 16:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All fixed. Sorry. Last year was a bit of a mess. The Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 18:16, 16 April 2023 (UTC) (EDIT: Ahh... yes. The City Connect uniforms. They're very varied in use, and I'm watching on a case-to-case basis on what becomes a regular alternate and what doesn't. But I just got the league done as far as I've seen. CC additions should be coming in the next few weeks.)[reply]
Awesome. Thanks so much. The Braves are wearing the CC jersey for every Saturday home game in 2023. Nemov (talk) 19:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. There are sources for that if needed. It's probably one of the better CC uniforms, but I'm admittedly biased. BilCat (talk) 19:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, I even got the cap the day they went on sale. The Saturday home rotation is mentioned in the uniform section. Nemov (talk) 19:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article

I would like to get this article to WP:GA. I haven't done that before, but this article is a good candidate for it. A lot of the history section is unsourced so some work will need to be done to get that right, but any help or tips would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Getting an article adequately sourced is often the main milestone for GA and A-class articles. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some citations to the history section, but I think I'll go through an summarize all the way through first. Finding sources in the newspaper archives shouldn't be to difficult. It'll take some time, but if that section is well sourced it should be pretty close. Nemov (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Best of luck. I recommend looking at other relevant GAs to model off of. New York Yankees is GA, not sure if any of the other 28 franchises are. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, yeah I've been looking at that article as a good starting point. Nemov (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sourcing looks good now through the Boston era. The Atlanta history probably should be summarized in a similar fashion so it resembles the rest of the article. That's the next step. After that the sourcing looks solid for the article. Nemov (talk) 16:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So I think the sourcing is there. I would welcome a second pair of eyes before making a request for good article status. The images in the article appear good from a copyright standpoint. Am I missing anything? Thanks! Nemov (talk) 16:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attendance

Does this belong in the article? I just updated for 2023, but I'm wondering if it would be better placed at Truist Park. At the very least, the Turner Field numbers can be removed. I'm removing the Turner Field stuff for now, but will move the other if there's not objection. Nemov (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not in a table but notable attendance numbers could be worked in History section, such as major increases or decreases. Just a thought. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A separate Milwaukee Braves article

Please see the WikiProject Baseball talk page for discussion involving the creation of a separate Milwaukee Braves article. Spesh531^{(talk, contrib., ext.)} 16:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Atlanta Braves/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Nemov (talk · contribs) 16:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

your nomination for the article Atlanta Braves is being reviewed to become a GA article we will keep you posted via this page or my talk page best of luck to your nomonation ~best regards Paytonisboss (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Paytonisboss (talk · contribs) 13:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RELIABLE AND GOOD NOBILITY

this article is a reliable and a informative article it also has major nobility Paytonisboss (talk) 13:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this article is still under review

Meets GA Criteria

I have reviewed this article and found that it meets the GA article criteria

in the review I found the following things

The articles references establish major nobility

The article isn't in danger of having a copyright strike and dose not contain any plagiarism

The article is well written(meaning the article is clear and easy to understand)

The article addresses the main aspect of the article(meaning the article is written mainly about what the article is titled)

This article is neutral with multi-pal 3rd party sources

The article is stable(meaning it dose not have an ongoing edit war going on)

The article has multi-pal media, and image illustrations that are relevant to the topic and they don´t contain a copyright violation Paytonisboss (talk) 15:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]