Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2014/06

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2014

01 June 2014

Temporary full protection: There appears to be an content dispute edit war between at least 4 other users, all autoconfirmed. Tutelary (talk) 19:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Mike V • Talk 21:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent non-constructive edits. Last protection was one week. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 17:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: SPAs and IPs reverting to a particular version of the page over the past few days, with info not supported by sources. Ivanvector (talk) 13:52, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I suggest talking to the SPA/IP about the issues before requesting protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Noted, thanks. Ivanvector (talk) 16:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent vandalism by IP since yesterday. Powerplant786 (talk) 10:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Both editors have received 3RR warnings, suggest dispute resolution lest you both be blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent vandalism by IP since yesterday. The user is persistently deleting sourced content and his pushing his POV and petty changes. Powerplant786 (talk) 10:39, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Both editors have received 3RR warnings, suggest dispute resolution lest you both be blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent vandalism by IP since yesterday. The user is persistently deleting sourced content and his pushing his POV and petty changes. Please note, the IP started his vandalism yesterday, and is consistently vandalizing pages related to Indian cuisine by deleting sourced content, no creative edits have been made by the IP so far. Powerplant786 (talk) 10:39, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note to admins the above sock user created his account a day or two ago specifically removing mention of Pakistan from the three articles above he is obviously a experienced vandal and targets those specific pages his petty edits are getting out of hand. 109.145.225.135 (talk) 10:52, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Both editors have received 3RR warnings, suggest dispute resolution lest you both be blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was recently the subject of edit-warring by an anonymous editor who was subsequently blocked. The editor then changed his IP and came back to vandalise so Materialscientist protected the article, as well as List of countries by population (United Nations). Now that the protection has ended, the IP has returned. AussieLegend (✉) 18:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was recently the subject of edit-warring by an anonymous editor who was subsequently blocked. The editor then changed his IP and came back to vandalise so Materialscientist protected the article, as well as List of countries by population. Now that the protection has ended, the IP has returned. AussieLegend (✉) 18:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits by IP users. Mayast (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer ruomurs. Will go on until transfer window opens 1 July. QED237 (talk) 10:40, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user consistently removing text, adding new stuff, and then deleting it, but replacing the original text. No reasons or explanation given. Bazonka (talk) 10:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:32, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Different IP addresses keep inserting the same information that has been challenged since 40 days ago. No reliable source was produced to support the material and the IP has not engaged in talk page discussion. Mohamed CJ (talk) 20:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Kelapstick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (3 months) tutterMouse (talk) 15:45, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not sure where the three months above came from, but there hasn't been that much recent disruption. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Was meant for a different request, sorry! 16:37, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Large uptick in addition of linkspam as the test results are about to be released. --Ronz (talk) 16:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a rumour of of big-name signings. It is anons who are adding it here. Please lock the article for about 14 days until something certain happens. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:24, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced content by IP's. Chander For You 08:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by CallaneccDiannaa (talk) 15:45, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated recreation of multiple socks creating attack pages. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 12:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of multiple socks creating attack pages. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 12:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced rumours. Will go on at least until transfer window opens 1 July. QED237 (talk) 10:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: persistent edit warring. There's a previous request for protection here. We tried to block the IP user instead, which proved ineffective. After a week-long block, the same reverts are being made from a different IP. A persistent IP block would be inefficient and possibly hurt other editors from the same ISP, but rejecting pending changes would allow us to handle the situation without the disruptive edits hitting the article. Diego (talk) 07:06, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've gone this way again, if it continues I'll semi the page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Bergdahl was just released. We could use PC1 for the next week or so to stem the flood of drive-by editors. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pending changes protection should not be used on pages with a high edit rate. There isn't enough disruptive editing (and associated reverts) to justify semi protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prem Raj Pushpakaran (edit | project page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs removing MFD template while discussion is still ongoing. Peacock (talk) 10:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page deleted. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptions by numerous IP editors over the past several days. United States Man (talk) 04:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: As noted in the ref desk talk page, the language desk is currently plagued by various socks (probably all the same user) which are causing disruption. A week or two of semi should help fend them off. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 02:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's start with this and see how it goes. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: - A lot of disprutive edits and adding of unconfirmed news on countries etc etc. --BabbaQ (talk) 19:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Steven Walling • talk 23:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been reverts lately. George Ho (talk) 19:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 23:38, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism to the filmography section with people adding and deleting info without sources or citation. Amaltheias (talk) 18:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 23:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – from past 10 days the page was prone to vandalism where on some cricketers records they are writing their own names. Vin09 (talk) 11:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Steven Walling • talk 23:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High number of non-referenced and vandal edits going on through different ip addresses. Temporary semi-protection was granted earlier which expired in January. Mr RD 09:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I see also useful IP edits, this is why pending changes are preferred to semi-protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 02:11, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued addition of unsourced, improperly cited and speculative material from newly registered editors and IP's. Was semi-protected back in December 2013 for a week. Wes Mᴥuse 19:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Steven Walling • talk 22:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent genre warring from an IP (who is probably a sock of the banned user SugarBear) who is determined to have Mudvayne listed as progressive metal, constantly adding irrelevant sources. There is so much genre warring going on that the genre field has even been removed despite there being a plethora of genre related sources for Mudvayne. I call the big one bitey (talk) 23:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of One month., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 00:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sjö (talk) 20:26, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Would like to tag this with G8, but needs protection removed first. Thanks. JMHamo (talk) 13:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deleted. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – On going discussion, twice been moved while consensus for move is being sought. Article is under Troubles restrictions of 1rr. Murry1975 (talk) 22:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 23:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No results to be posted until 12 June so lock until 11 July?. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 23:16, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism that violates WP:COMMONNAME concerning the character of Ben Westbourne. livelikemusic my talk page! 02:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 23:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 12:10, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:16, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs are vandalizing the MFD, changing others people's comments, switching them from "delete" to "keep". Peacock (talk) 10:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. R3ap3R (talk) 18:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 22:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent high level of IP vandalism from highly-profiled casting changes for character of Billy Abbott; requesting protection until end of June when "nuBilly" takes over. livelikemusic my talk page! 00:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 22:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

02 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues... Hoops gza (talk) 18:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Bagumba (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Protect this page for two weeks. - Non-confirmed user adding content against wikipedia policies. 101.56.147.113 (talk) 03:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Does TheRedPenOfDoom have any comment on this request, seems to be handling it fine. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
i dont know that the new user is deliberately attempting to be disruptive, just that they dont understand the difference between what /how an encyclopedia should cover content and what/how celebrity gossip/fan pages consist of (but i am pretty sure that I am not a person they will listen to and try to learn from)-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, Semi-protection will be ineffective in a day or two as the user in question will be autoconfirmed. If there is a larger problem it should be discussed with the user, rather than fully protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: A vandal keeps making persistent insertion of factual errors. Multiple blocks so far haven't helped. Temporary protection of the page helped only while it lasted, for a few days. A quick glance at the article history speaks for itself, indefinite semi-protections is required. I can't sit all day long waiting to revert his persistent vandalism.Twofortnights (talk) 01:30, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, IP blocked, this spans well beyond just Singapore. The Henley Global use as a source is another issue in its own right, I have asked but had no response. This is easier to pick up if the edits are broad across multiple articles, and handled with an IP block. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:30, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Do you then disagree with your previous action because you protected it before on 8 April 2014 until 22 April 2014 for the very same reason. And yes IP is blocked for two weeks (despite requesting a serious reaction this time), but he edits from another IP address and God forbid he finds out about dynamic IP or proxies. Also it spanned beyond just this article only in the recent spree. And regardless of that, if we have this article where the vandalism is persistent and always the same (changing two numbers from 167 to 177 and 6 to 1) then it's irrelevant if he is also vandalizing other articles as the protection is not means to stop him but to protect the particular article. Also most of his vandalism edits are to Visa requirements for Singaporean citizens and over the course of several months. If we can't stop persistent targeted vandalism to one article with always the same edit - what can we do? This is not a rhetorical question.
And I don't know what your question about Henley was, but they use open source information provided by IATA to compile that list, and you can disagree with it for whatever reason, but some things are pretty simple, such as is Singapore listed as having access to 177 countries or 167 countries, it's not a content dispute, it's a simple number that needs to be copied into the article from the table, nothing else to it. But anyway that is not the question here, and also there is no reason to further analyze the nature of his edits as they indeed have been recognized as vandalism, he was blocked for it, thus not protecting this article is a grave mistake. Protection wouldn't cause any visible harm, but not protecting it will make this request current again in a very short time.--Twofortnights (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My issue with Henley is here, but in short, the question is "should we be using the self proclaimed Global Leaders In Residence and Citizenship Planning as a source for visa-free travel"? I have no desire to protect every Visa requirements for XXX citizens page on Wikipedia before knowing if we should be kiboshing what is effectively a moving consultant as a reliable source. If you look at the link to the IPs contributions, they have made edits to Iraq, Turkmenistan, Syria, etc. This is a larger problem that will not be solved by protection of one page alone. --kelapstick(bainuu) 12:45, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting questions, but we can discuss them elsewhere as they are not very relevant here as this is a simple protection request regarding a user vandalizing the statistical data provided. Whether it is reliable or not, is only about whether it should be included or not as a source, not if it can be falsified. If the source says there are 5 somethings, then we can't write there are 6 somethings in the article where this source is used. And none of this is controversial, I repeat his IP was blocked, it was officially recognized as vandalism. As for the other edits I can only repeat myself, most edits were done to this and not other articles, only edits to this article are persistent, and only edits to this article are spanning over the course of several months and only edits to this article are always the same.--Twofortnights (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Than consider it Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. and User(s) blocked.. two edits by one blocked IP and one blocked user in two days is hardly enough to warrant protection. Indefinate semi-protection is not necessary when it can, and is being handled by blocking. Sure there were more edits a week or two ago, but again the users/IP are blocked. Indefinite semi protection is only used when there are multiple anonymous users. After two weeks if the IP keeps it up, it will be blocked again. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:57, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is hard to understand what standards are being applied here as the situation is completely the same as in April when this was the decision made - [1]?--Twofortnights (talk) 15:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"two edits by one blocked IP and one blocked user in two days is hardly enough to warrant protection." - how about a few dozen same edits over the course of two months? We could even build a bot that could automatically revert his edits as they are always the same, if anyone cared. If it is being handled, then how come I had to undo that vandalism dozens of times. The only moment when the vandalism was contained was when the article was protected. But I guess if you don't see a problem yourself without me pointing it out in the fact that some repetitive targeted (but easily recognizable) vandalism is occurring non-stop for two months and where we haven't managed to contain in the slightest (except for the 2 weeks when the article was protected) then nothing I write here can change it. We'll live with vandalism, because that is better than, umm well I don't know what, what are we protecting by non-protecting the article and allowing him to do his thing.--Twofortnights (talk) 15:14, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't remember the exact justification from a month ago, but it probably had to do with the users/IPs not being blocked at the time of the request. --kelapstick(bainuu) 15:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Page has been subjected to multiple reposting of book excerpt spam. First instance was here [2] by a WP:CORPNAME editor, which I reverted. It was re-added twice by IP editors ([3], [4]), which I also reverted. Requesting temporary semi-protection to stop future spam reposting. Drm310 (talk) 15:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Increased speculation of taking another job has add to the frequecncy of unsourced incorrect additions by IPs. Murry1975 (talk) 11:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:04, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Given the news wires are a buzz with news of abdication this should be protected from IP's until details are known (see http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27662301) . LGA talkedits 08:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism/good faith edits had came across on this article. I would suggest protect this as pending changes so that reviewers could review the edits first. They are mostly good faith edits. TheQ Editor (Talk) 02:50, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Koala15 (talk) 02:28, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Not all IP edits are vandalism, at least one registered user blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. Mschamberlain (talk) 19:49, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

181 transclusions is a pretty low number, any protection would be pre-emptive anyhow. tutterMouse (talk) 08:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, As tuttermouse stated, I don't really see the need. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced claims and disruption. ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 07:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dennis Bratland (talk) 05:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous sock and meat puppetry. Article about Minecraft creation of Tom Cassell was speedied but recreated. Now redirected to Tom Cassell. Accounts keep recreating the article. Note that article was created at the direct request of Tom Cassell. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Koalascare/Archive. Meters (talk) 02:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No protection as protection is likely to be more disruptive than the edits that led to it. Peter James (talk) 23:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I don't see it being more disruptive, AN/I and AN were protected by two seperate admins who thought it necessary. AN/I gets protected for a few hours at a time quite regularly. Protection expires in one hour, no reason not to let it lapse. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:43, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done kelapstick(bainuu) 23:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 17:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done kelapstick(bainuu) 23:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 17:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done kelapstick(bainuu) 23:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 17:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done kelapstick(bainuu) 23:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent defamatory IP vandalism. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 01:12, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 02:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:AussieLegend (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal is harrassing me on my talk page in response to me removing his vandalism from List of countries by population (United Nations) and List of countries by population and requesting page protection for both of those pages. AussieLegend (✉) 19:55, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mike V • Talk 21:05, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unnecessary information. Loose consensus is that crediting both Jay DeMarcus and Rascal Flatts is redundant. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question: TenPoundHammer I don't see any talk page discussion, if there is consensus it would be good to link to it there. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Kelapstick: Wikipedia_talk:WPMUSIC#Redundancy Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't call that "loose consensus", it's two people having a very short conversation. It should really be at the talk page however. I will keep an eye on it. You should also mention it to the IP, doesn't look like it has been brought up. --kelapstick(bainuu) 18:06, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For the sake of avoiding an inevitable 3RR, a cup of tea on the talk page would be nice, perhaps? kelapstick(bainuu) 23:50, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 18:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 17:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 17:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 17:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 17:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 17:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 17:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is highly likely to receive vandalism. . Fdizile (developer) 17:56, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

03 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: A range of IPs, most likely sockpuppets of competitor Suburban Express, are persistently edit-warring on this article since yesterday and adding negative content using non-neutral tone. If possible, the article should be reverted to this version before being protected.

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:28, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same IP socks from Suburban Express are persistently reverting back to an unsourced/poorly-sourced version which contains negative content written in a non-neutral tone. If possible, the article should be reverted to this version before being protected. AlmostGrad (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs and new users over the last week have persistently added copyrighted material from their website despite at least two blocks. I am One of Many (talk) 17:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 18:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article about newly created state has IP vandalism. Now at main page. Gfosankar (talk)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Being on the main page does not increase reason for protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP and new account vandalism. Widefox; talk 04:40, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. hasn't been anything for a week or so. GedUK  11:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – We've got two editors going back-and-forth with pager ownership issues, and for a change, I'm not one of the parties (and the admins rejoiced). I'll take it to the talk page now but a hammer may be necessary. This tournament is about to start so I would hope that a short lock would be adequate: four days please. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Let's hope that the discussion an the warnings encourage both parties into the discussion. I'm loathe to protect what's about to be a very high profile ariticle for a two person edit war/disagreement. I'd much rather block them if they carry on. GedUK  11:24, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been merged and redirected per AfD (see talk page). Anonymous IP user persistently attempted to disrupt the AfD and is now interfering with the redirect. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. I indef semi'd it.kelapstick(bainuu) 14:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopping vandalism.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 13:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent "pack" vandalism. Dwpaul Talk 04:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:32, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP in the news cycle. lots of IPs and SPA new accounts making BLP violations. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Not all IP edits are vandalism, seems one SPA is an issue, I just gave stern warning, and will block if it happens again (please report said editor to AIV if he cuts up). kelapstick(bainuu) 23:31, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kelapstick The hits keep on coming [5][6] Yes, there are some legit edits, but the BLP or vandal ones are fairly constant. If not semi, what about PC1 that would at least keep these off the page for the viewers.Gaijin42 (talk) 03:42, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Kelapstick: Gaijin is right. The work and attention that disruptive IP edits create outweighs the benefits from helpful edits. This is unfair to editors who want to keep track of helpful changes. The news stories on Bergdahl should diminish in a few days at which point protection won't be needed. – S. Rich (talk) 04:47, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:41, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated adding of unsourced information. Though some editors at fault may be autoconfirmed so a temporary full protection may be needed to settle content dispute with the last version by myself being the safe version until dispute is settled. CRRaysHead90 | #RaysUp 08:45, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 08:59, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 times by 3 different IPs in past 24 hoursVVikingTalkEdits 03:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page under attack by a small number of SPAs. See recent page history. Dwpaul Talk 01:54, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:15, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Various IP users revert the same edit. Their point is not sourced and speculative. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:45, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of copyrighted images by new accounts. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 22:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No, though I appreciate the report, Vigyani. First of all, it's nothing we can't handle right now (thanks to you also). Second, the best way, for now, to handle this is to report those copyright violators on Commons and to warn them here; if they do it again, they'll be blocked. If it really gets out of hand we'll semi-protect. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just closing the template to activate the ping Doc, nothing to see here. --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I will come back if it persist. The account was different every time, so I did not see much point in warning or blocking.--Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 01:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary template protection: Highly visible template – Unless there are Template editors that are part of the dispute, I can't see any reason for this to be protected past that level. Thank you. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 23:38, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, That is not the purpose of template protection. If there is something that needs to be changed during it's protection you can request an edit (a touchy subject, I'd suggest approaching an admin directly rather than using edit request on the talk page) or run for RfA, which would probably take less time then the content dispute. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:45, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: All major large universities have their "list of alumni" page unprotected or semi-protected for a brief period. As can be seen from the talk page of the article, alumni like Sally Kohn were never added despite being asked to do so. Many people don't want to create account, let alone make 10 edits to get themselves autoconfirmed status. NYU has at least 1,859 alumni with Wikipedia articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:New_York_University_alumni Unprotect the page and then keep an eye on the page if you think it's warranted.--65.51.205.72 (talk) 20:46, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Previous protecting admin declined, and is considering indef protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Snood1205 (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's hope the kids lose interest after that. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Been subjected to two undiscussed moves, despite there being no reason to move it on the basis of views and over-arching importance. "My master, Annatar the Great, bids thee welcome!" 17:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Not required any more, the non-disambuguted name can no longer be moved over the redirect except by any administrator.kelapstick(bainuu) 22:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and non-constructive editing. Wes Mᴥuse 20:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of sometime in June, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Drmies (talk) 23:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long-term spamming of links for promotional purposes. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems to be the same person, but different IPs, let's try three months, and go from there. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:17, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism persists after recent page protection period had ended. Hoops gza (talk) 18:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This player has signed a contract to move on 1 July. Editors are applying the change immediately. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Drmies (talk) 23:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The club's most notable player agreed to leave for a rival team over a year ago and the transfer will take effect a month from now but editors are applying the change here now. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Drmies (talk) 23:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Lots of anonymous edits right now for this new Apple programming language. Husky (talk page) 19:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a year, maybe he will meet the guidelines by then, maybe not. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection Persistent edit-warring over whether to keep this as an article or redirect it to Chiropractic Education. The article has been redirected without consensus three times in the past month; eleven times in the past two months. --MelanieN (talk) 16:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Come to think of it, this isn't a situation where move protection would be appropriate. Sorry, my bad. Is there any kind of protection that would help? The edit warring is being done by autoconfirmed users, so semiprotection is of no use. --MelanieN (talk) 17:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Move protection wouldn't work as there is a redirect in place, and it is basically blanking/redirecting, not moving. Also, user blocked.kelapstick(bainuu) 17:20, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

04 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Higher than normal occurrences of IP vandalism, possibly due to recently released system update and coming from fanboys of competing consoles. Temporary protection (a few days) should be enough to ward off the troublemakers. McDoobAU93 19:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request for protection for at least three weeks, IPs and multiple users keep adding things that are not credible/not supported by any references. Some are also small types of vandalism. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 15:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Due to the controversy over the team's name, I propose temporary semi-protection until the end of the 2014 NFL season. ONR (talk) 13:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dadu (talk) 12:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced additions. Last protection was 2 weeks. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 12:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No prejudice against a second request if it increases, feel free to ask me directly. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Only 17 transclusions. No need for full protection. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You did ask User:DangerousPanda first as protecting admin, right? tutterMouse (talk) 17:03, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, Jackmcbarn please ask the protecting admin first, the template was subject to significant vandalism in the past. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from both IP and new users. Confusing the actor with the part? Maybe protect until Doctor Who starts up again in August? Whatever can be done would be appreciated. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 16:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Just Whovians trying to be clever, judging by the usernames. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism a day following PP removal. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 11:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Holding off to see if it picks up after the revert. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recurring cases of IP vandalism. Emesik (talk) 01:03, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, This seems to be a very slow burning content despute, with no discussion on the talk page. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs teaming up to remove AfD notice. Protect until discussion ends, maybe. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 15:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Changed by User:Kelapstick. Bearian (talk) 15:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP hopping vandal and sockpuppeteer inserts a dubious and unsourced list of artist in the "cast of characters" section of this article since May. User has been warned several times but upon changing his/her IP address or creates a new sockpuppet, he resumes the addition of the dubious content. -WayKurat (talk) 13:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Constant edits by IP socks who add the same edits, was semi protected before. Novato 123chess456 (talk) 12:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, defamatory content by multiple IP accounts. JNW (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:03, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection: Persistent long term vandalism. LibStar (talk) 11:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has continued after recent page protections. Hoops gza (talk) 02:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected again a few seconds later, for the same 1 month duration. Definitely protected now :) — MusikAnimal talk 05:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is many cases of vandalism i can't end, they are still continued. SMB99thx XD 04:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 05:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:K6ka/Archive 4 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own user space (it's an archive page). --k6ka (talk | contribs) 02:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mike V • Talk 03:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by dynamic IP. . SummerPhD (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Donner60 (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (and IP blocked) Go Phightins! 01:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated issues with promotion of book/videos, and with links to copyright-violating material. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This is a plausible search term and I'd like to create a redirect at this title. . gobonobo + c 19:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question: A search term for what? People are not going to search Obamamania when they can just search Obama. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Gobonobo just pinging. --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Kelapstick: Obamamania is a term that has been used in multiple sources [7][8][9], and is in the titles of several books [10][11][12], so I'm considering it a 'plausible search term'. Of course, if there are concerns that it would be subject to vandalism, it could always be protected. gobonobo + c 00:03, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What article are you proposing to use it to redirect to? AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:17, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think that could be up for debate. I was thinking a soft direct to the Wiktionary article and possibly a disambiguation page. Obamamania was used mostly during the Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008 and public image of Barack Obama is related, though neither article mentions the term. It is mentioned as the 2008 Word of the year, but I don't think that's a good target. gobonobo + c 15:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If it is 'up for debate' where to redirect to, it clearly isn't an obvious search term at all. We don't create redirects just for the sake of it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect targets are not always obvious. Sometimes several targets make sense and sometimes none do. That really has nothing to do with whether it is an obvious search term. gobonobo + c 15:22, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well if you want to make a redirect you should come up with where you want to target it before requesting unprotection, I would also think that this would require some discussion prior to creation as well.--kelapstick(bainuu) 20:03, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, gobonobo Presumably you intend to redirect Obamamania to Barack Obama, but as a search term, it would be rather useless as the term Obamamania does not appear in the article whatsoever. You wouldn't search for Barack Obama by searching for Obamamania, you would just search Obama, which redirects to BO already. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, deleting image relevant to the article it just goes on and on and on.--Catflap08 (talk) 23:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:55, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. 1966batfan (talk) 19:41, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Users warned, although I don't see this as the end of it. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:49, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Doctor Who-related vandalism. Breawycker public (talk) main account (talk) 19:27, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. User(s) have or should be warned, and blocked if necessary. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:33, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two anonymous IPs, probably the same person or in collusion. Edit - Page has been vandalised by a third since application for page protection. All IPs are probably sam person or in colusion (they all are traceable back to Lancaster University.DJAMP4444 (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:17, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: differend IPs (but looking at the contributions of them ,it looks like it is always the same person who do his vandalisem on the same 3 pages : Panzer 68, Zielfahrzeug 68 and Pima Air & Space Museum ). The anomy IP's made always redirections of Zielfahrzeug 68 to Panzer 68, so the Details of the Zielfahrzeug 68 are no more visibal. The Zielfahrzeug is a springoff of the Panzer 68 but not just a modified Panzer 68. FLORAKO (talk) 18:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, take it to the talk page, there are not just IPs reversing your edits. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:29, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: - High volume of vandalism from the same IP user who has been at it for the last hour. Wes Mᴥuse 15:33, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please note this article has already been semi'd twice in the last month. First for 2 days on 11 May, and then 2 weeks on 13 May. Wes Mᴥuse 15:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Mike V • Talk 18:45, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

05 June 2014

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. Should receive the same protection level as {{Redirect template}} Petr Matas 11:54, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Mike V • Talk 20:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism by IP hopping vandal. Jim1138 (talk) 08:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 20:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request 1 week's protection. Multiple instances of vandalism from multiple IPs. LT910001 (talk) 01:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP has been adding and removing unconfirmed transfers. GoPurple'nGold24 00:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of Honorific "Sant". This article always faced this problem, so an indefinite protection is requested. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 23:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated as a test page. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 19:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 19:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has an extensive protection history. After the last one year ban expired on the 22nd April, article has experienced a staggering amount of vandalism from a wide variety of IP sources. Based on the very large block history, wide variety of IP sources and the immediacy with which it resumed, as well as its almost daily nature, I request enduring protection. LT910001 (talk) 23:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely per requester. If given another year of semi-protection the vandalism would very likely resume, as has been the case for many years. — MusikAnimal talk 18:54, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This relates to my AN3 report at WP:AN3#User:Yatzhek reported by User:Dougweller (Result: Locked. There's been a lot more drama over this than I expected, including an SPI[13] accusing User:Drmies, User:Ian.thomson and myself of being socks. The editor who locked it has agreed that any uninvolved Admin can unlock. Drmies has JSTOR and other material to add and I've also been researching the article. If you read the AN3 report in full (including comments by Drmies and others) and User talk:Yatzhek#Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion it seems unlikely that locking the article for a week will change Yatzhek's behavior, which is the only problem after semi-protection as added. I'm asking that protection be reduced to semi-protection as there has indeed been problems with IPs. Dougweller (talk) 18:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Unprotected already by Bishonen, and onherstelbaar verbeterd by yours truly. Happy Boniface day everyone. Drmies (talk) 18:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After becoming unprotected it's already the target of vandalism again. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:54, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by obsessive Malaysian IP hopper has resumed. Areaseven (talk) 06:17, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not enough activity for semi protection. Pending changes should be fine for now. Mike V • Talk 14:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. The article includes some anthropological data focused on the occurences of an aquiline nose. Someone who is hiding behind an IP address is very persistent in reverting the sourced data (anthropological source) and trying to prove a WP:POINT by giving a source made by some economist whose hobby was anthropology and who was unaware of the extstance of Armenoid race in Europe. The gallery section is also being destroyed, and a lot of people who do not have an aquiline nose were added in place of people with classic aquiline noses. Please, protect the article in the form as it is here (I fixed it) - [14]. Thank you. Yatzhek (talk) 09:34, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The annonymous IP user strikes again: [15] => [16], [17]. Could someone help me in protecting the article from such edits? The user is deleting the sourced anthropological data. Yatzhek (talk) 14:09, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Drmies (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 15:21, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Constant changing of adding The Fresh Prince of Bel Air to former programming even though it is still airing ultimately violating WP:Crystalball. This is not edit warring as multiple users are doing this.Mmddyy28 (Contact Me Here) 21:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two users (Adabow and Coolmarc) are disputing about whether to keep a Mediaguide South African Airplay chart, since they have revered each other repeatedly. IPadPerson (talk) 22:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@IPadPerson: I am trying to discuss the issue with the user on his/her talkpage, as he/she is having a hard time understanding the reason behind the removal. No further reverts will be made until the issue is resolved.—CoolMarc 22:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, See above kelapstick(bainuu) 23:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Unconstructive editing over something that has come to consensus (Joplin's listed DOB and birthplace). Hoops gza (talk) 21:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – History of vandalism on this page. Paris1127 (talk) 18:49, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP reverts, (non-WP:NPOV) edits and undo's based on personal opinion or agenda. Seemingly very sensitive article for some people. LouisAragon (talk) 22:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A football player recently in the news, lots of vandalism. Antrocent (talk) 21:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing addition of unsourced content. Adabow (talk) 21:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Λeternus (talk) 18:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done IPs geolocate to the Philippines where it is 3:00 am, actions were about five hours ago, no real need at this state. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

06 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism due to subject's recent hiring. LaSeandre (talk) 14:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Previously I asked for semi-protection of above mentioned article. After a discussion with user:Ymblanter I wonder if the protection could be changed to pending changes indefinitely as the disruptive editing is mostly of the same kind and persistent. Qualified edits are always welcomed and as I and some other editors have the article on their watchlist this might be the best tool.--Catflap08 (talk) 12:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, The article is already semiprotected, if you have an issue with the couple of registered editors editing there, you are best to discuss it with them directly, preferably on their talk page. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:18, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This page was fully protected at my request. It would now appear that the two main culprits have been dealt with blocks. As an editor has pointed out, it's counter productive to have those blocks and the article locked. Could we change it to semi in case of ip socks? We could even remove it altogether for my vote and hope the blocks do their job. Fyunck(click) (talk) 17:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No sources as of now that say subject has died. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. SlimVirgin (talk) 16:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:11, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lugia2453 (talk) 16:00, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit hesitant to protect my own talk page, and let another admin decide.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:02, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --kelapstick(bainuu) 16:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Same WP:Disruptive editing by IP hopper/WP:Sockpuppet Sahyadrisingh that got the article semi-protected before. Flyer22 (talk) 14:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The editor has again IP-hopped and reverted. He or she constantly IP hops to WP:Edit war unsourced and/or unencyclopedic material into the article, and continues to disregard any attempt at discussing the matter. When the article is semi-protected, he or she will come out to behave in the same way under the Sahyadrisingh account. It does not appear that this editor will ever cease in behaving disruptively. Flyer22 (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 16:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 81.109.144.47 (talk) 12:15, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, due to irony. Actually not enough recent disruption. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:18, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP users are removing well-referenced texts without bothering to read what we discussed on the talk page. elmasmelih (used to be KazekageTR) 20:34, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. At least not by IPs, consider warning and the AIV, seems to be some autoconfirmed content dispute too.kelapstick(bainuu) 11:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, One revert makes not an edit war. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Sock of indefinitely blocked User:Hiyob346 disrupting page. Also edit-warring on my userpage despite WP:HUSH ([18]). Middayexpress (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User is autoconfirmed, Middayexpress have you considered expanding the SPI? kelapstick(bainuu) 11:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection due to IP vandalism (see [19]). Quis separabit? 16:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Rms125a@hotmail.com I think you need to relook at your reverting, you are reverting back to part of the article that says it is scheduled to be released in February of this year, when it is already June. So not all of the edit is disruptive, and I wouldn't call their edits vandalism per se. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: The article was re-renamed by the recent WP:MRV consensus. George Ho (talk) 07:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:25, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 30 day page protection just ended yesterday, I believe, and a recurring, IP hopping vandal based in Mexico has resumed the usual nonsense. There's not much to it, they keep editing the article to say this: [20] It's being considered vandalism because they continue to remove a perfectly legitimate template parameter, "format=dmy" without any explanation, they cannot be warned or reasoned with, they do not participated in discussion, they keep hopping IPs, and they've been at it since about December 2013. I could paste specific diffs, but I've done that numerous times. Please look at the article's edit history and you'll see the 189.159.* and 189.243* IPs all over this article. This isn't the only article either, they also keep messing with United Plankton Pictures where they keep changing section headers and adding blank sub-sections. Requesting long-term protection from IPs, say for 3 months? In the interim, I'll run this past ANI again for rangeblock consideration, but I'm sure I've done this before. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one edit to the page.kelapstick(bainuu) 11:29, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 01:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: an IP editor keeps removing columns from the calendar table without reason or explanation. Semi-protection has deterred him in the past. Requesting semi-protection for one month. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 01:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:07, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Not all IP edits are vandalism, lots of editors keeping an eye on it. Including me. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content (transfer rumours). QED237 (talk) 12:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vin09 (talk) 13:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:08, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated genre changing from drive-by IPs and new accounts. The article was just created on June 1, and this has been occurring a lot since then. Kokoro20 (talk) 11:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated adding of copyright protected materiel. The Banner talk 18:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.Powerplant786 (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:05, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.Powerplant786 (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:06, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs from Indonesia are edit warring, and insulting other editors. Binksternet (talk) 00:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another IP. Various Indonesian IPs have been vandalizing this article for the last three days. Binksternet (talk) 04:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as per above. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:37, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 21:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 21:06, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by new users and anon IP editors. STATic message me! 06:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:26, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NSH002 (talk) 04:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:26, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Long-time vandal TheREALCableGuy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) removing sourced items about the block being educational via an assortment of open proxies; this has been their MO on every children's block with educational elements. Nate • (chatter) 04:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 01:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:32, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs from Indonesia are edit warring, and insulting other editors. Binksternet (talk) 00:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another IP. Various Indonesian IPs have been vandalizing this article for the last three days. Binksternet (talk) 04:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by another admin. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: - Edit conflict between established users.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:51, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect due to a lot of unconfirmed speculation about a transfer to Liverpool F.C.. JMHamo (talk) 11:18, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There appears to be a week long edit war content dispute between multiple editors (or socks) on the proper use of Aromanian. An administrator is involved and has said there is a conflict of interest in his blocking people. Could we get 3 days of full protection until they decide the proper content. I'm not involved with this dispute so I don't particularly care which way it falls (as long as it's sourced properly). Fyunck(click) (talk) 02:02, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player rumoured to change club so all sorts of vandalism/unsourced edits to BLP . QED237 (talk) 19:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 25 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (That's until the transfer window opens on 1 July.) — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:32, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: It seems that the disruptive editing starts again – it was quiet for a little while after the last semi-protection. It took a long time to get the article as neutral an unbiased as possible – informative and free of religious propaganda. Yet again large Russian language sections are included, referenced material deleted and information added to act as a soap box for a certain Nichiren branch. In the end all those edits and disruptions that led to the previous two semi-protections. Could the article be semi-protected indefinitely now? In the end the article can still be edited, but a stop would be made to disruptive edits by IP addresses.--Catflap08 (talk) 07:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I do not see how indefinite semi-protection would be approppriate for a hopping IP editing once per month. If disruption continues, we would need to apply pending changes.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow burning editwar about the local channels. The Banner talk 00:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – You may think this a little stale, but vandalism circa June 1 persists after recent long page protection ended. Hoops gza (talk) 23:09, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. —Bagumba (talk) 04:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hoops gza (talk) 22:30, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Bagumba (talk) 04:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 06:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More vandalism. IPs from Indonesia are edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 00:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yet another IP. Various Indonesian IPs have been vandalizing this article for the last three days. Binksternet (talk) 04:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 04:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highl level of unreasoned reverts and edits by drive-by IP's and new accounts. Has been semi-protected for a day, now asking for indefinite. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The last edit was in December 2012 and the template is only transluded 16 times. Unfortunately this does not meet the threshold for protection. Mike V • Talk 20:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the wake of his very recent death. fuzzy510 (talk) 01:16, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like vandalism subsided, please ping me or reapply if it continues.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 23:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • (comment from editor involved): This is being talked through on the article talk page with other editors. I don't believe protection will be necessary in light of this. —JennKR | ☎ 01:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I agree with JennKR. As of now, all involved editors are engaging in discussion on the talk page and the edit warring has stopped. Mike V • Talk 20:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

07 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is experience an influx of vandalism. Most likely from fans of his alma mater upset about allegations he made against the school [21]. This will probably blow over in a month or so. . Calidum Talk To Me 17:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:29, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP user is engaging in a slow edit war to introduce unsourced/poorly sourced info into the article. Diannaa (talk) 17:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:18, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Downgrade to Semi-protection: I would like to cleanup all the junk sources like Investopedia and court documents, which cannot practically be done using Edit-Request. Semi-protection should be adequate to prevent non-auto-confirmed SPA COI accounts. CorporateM (Talk) 16:10, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Waiting to see what Black kite says, this is a touchy area given the recent discussion on Jimbo's talk page. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Black kite has reduced it to semi-protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:25, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP on my own user page. Hoops gza (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done kelapstick(bainuu) 16:54, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New users/IPs have been repeatedly adding the lists, despite them being a copyright violation, as I had mentioned on the talk page. Zappa24Mati 14:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This page has a constant vandalism by IP user 208.54.4.241, WP:VAN, I am requesting a Semi-protection for Richie's page, as the IP user is temporary blocked within 31 hours, but I am sure he will come back eventually and start vandalizing Richie's page again. This IP user has also vandalized Richie's page on Wikia, with the same exact IP. Real Richie Rich page on Wikia > page history OriginalDoc (talk) 12:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. It's generally one or the other. We usually semi for multiple IPs. If he returns, we block again. Please report to WP:AIV upon return. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. — Smjg (talk) 08:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Unexplained removal of contents. RRD13 (talk) 06:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not of the last week anyway. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ever since this article was created last week, it was bombarded with vandalism from a bunch of IPs of User:Bertrand101: a longtime vandal and one of his most targeted articles are about either Rey PJ Abellana and Carlito Gonzaga. See Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Bertrand101 for further evidence. -WayKurat (talk) 06:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, This looks like it could be handled with a block if the IP continues after warning. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Very high level of vandalism by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 01:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP is edit-warring to introduce text that contradicts sources. IP refused to address arguments in talk page. IP complains of biased editors, says that wikipedia policies are mistaken, claims a conspiracy ("Mainstream Peer Reveiw are on a mission to suppress, discredit and destroy Plasma Cosmology as an obvious threat") and other things. --Enric Naval (talk) 20:51, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note the IP has also been reported at WP:3RRNB. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:42, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated re-addition of WP:COPYVIO content by IP users. AldezD (talk) 17:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, This can be handled by a block if the IP continues after this last warning. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring: IP address keeps adding unsourced and nonsensical material to article. cyclopiaspeak! 16:11, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 13:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Morgan was recently critically injured in a car accident and now different IP are saying he's dead without providing sources the page should be protected until more facts become known. 74.103.250.78 (talk) 13:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:12, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. HYH.124 (talk) 08:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Currently, multiple people involved in the conference in question are reverting a piece of information sourced to one sentence in one RS, with WPO mods putting it back in. For the sake of sanity, full protection for a week would be useful - that way we'll see if any other sources pick it up, and it'll also force people to discuss usefully on the talk page instead of just going back and forth. Kevin Gorman (talk) 22:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gorman, you're being disingenuous. You and Cla68 are the only ones edit-warring, and you, being an administrator, are the more culpable. Your asking for full protection is nothing more than an attempt to win a content dispute by other means. Why don't you just keep talking about it on the talk page? Or are you out of arguments?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 02:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kevin Gorman is ultra-involved here. Don't reward POV warriors by locking down their favored versions. Carrite (talk) 07:10, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not to be seen as a reward for anything nor an endorsement of any version, I protected the version that was present at the time of my review of RFPP. Of course I know it is the wrong version. --kelapstick(bainuu) 11:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edits have been problematic, can't imagine it getting any better now that the Finals are here. Hoops gza (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 13 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The Banner talk 20:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 240 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous disrupting edits by over 7 unregistered accounts... Temp should be fine? Thkie (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over the past two weeks, the majority of the IP edits have been reverted. Give the history a look and decide? I think this article could use it. Tutelary (talk) 18:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term, consistent abuse by IP's with fancruft and such edits of top-rated soap opera, whose current high-profiled casting decisions are in the media. livelikemusic my talk page! 16:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:32, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disrupting edits by IPs....temp should be fine. ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 15:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's not just IPs, there is at least one autoconfirmeds, three days, and get some discussion going about the inclusion/exclusion of the section.kelapstick(bainuu) 11:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: High level of new account vandalism. Surprisingly little IP vandalism. Not sure about level or length of protection, whatever seems appropriate. Appreciation for y'alls attention.  :) ‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 15:00, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry, and copyvios by unregistered IP accounts. Psychonaut (talk) 14:15, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I see many constructive and semi-constructive IP edits, and semi-protection is not appropriate in this situation. I set pending changes for three months, let us see how well they work.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Third request in two weeks (previous was here). Obviously the anonymous editor making the disruptive edits is not going away, and comes from a different IP each time so the previous two individual blocks have proven ineffective. Semi-protection as suggested by the previous admin would be too high, as it would prevent other IP users from making constructive edits. Diego (talk) 14:01, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indef pending changes over the placement of a section within a film article seems somewhat excessive. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request: semi-protection an IP editorr and two brand new (first edits) users have been vandalizing the Ong Kean Swan article which was recently recreated in an NPOV way after its promotional ancestor was deleted. I suspect this will continue. --Bejnar (talk) 02:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Don't see why it shouldn't be page protected, since it was recently page protected, and then vandalism ensued following the end of the page protection. Hoops gza (talk) 23:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I've semiprotected it indefinitely. Can't see this not being an issue for a long time. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I should like to note that it still has PC applied to it... is that not superfluous? - Hoops gza (talk) 00:55, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indef (please use the {{RFPP}} template, Cas Liber) tutterMouse (talk) 07:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. For a day or whenever the user comes back. IP makes it clear will target this user all day, all week etc. SlightSmile 23:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Discospinster (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 07:06, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous etc.

Temporary semi for maybe a week or two, on this and other ref desk pages, to fend off a persistent Venezuela-based ref desk troll. Normally the admins would block him on-sight, but they seem to have grown weary of this game. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:27, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can you do this for the other ref desk sub-pages as well? They're all being hit by the IP-hopper (and FYI, the IP just above is one of them - playing both sides of the fence, in his game.) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:29, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, gave 'em a week each - we'll see how it goes. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Don't forget the talk page 190.206.12.85 (talk) 00:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Melanie Griffith has filed for divorce and editors are coming in with premature endings to the marriage in the infobox. Elizium23 (talk) 00:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:28, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term or indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent seven year long efforts from sockpuppet accounts to add gibberish accusations of fraud against the company. Was protected for 1 week in March, 2014 following sockpuppet investigation (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marcoa1000/Archive). Article has been vandalized six times since then.[22][23][24][25][26] If these socks are all coming from the same IP could we get a range-block too? Thanks, - Wikidemon (talk) 21:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Wikidemon have you considered extending the SPI? It seems as though there are at least three accounts present that could be included. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not too familiar with the process. My first report resulted in short term page protection so I thought I'd stop here. I don't think blocking the accounts would do much because this person starts with a new account each time even when the old accounts aren't blocked, but perhaps if someone can check the IP address(es) they might be from a unique range. - Wikidemon (talk) 23:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SPI isn't my are of expertise, but I know a guy. Will look into that as well.kelapstick(bainuu) 23:24, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

08 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Suspected sockpuppet of NYCSlover at work. Ticks all the right boxes, like introducing a massive amount of links to disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 21:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:02, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. by another admin. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Suspected sockpuppet of NYCSlover at work. Ticks all the right boxes, like introducing a massive amount of links to disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 21:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. by another admin. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting semi-protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users until June 15, 2014. IPs keep adding unsourced future broadcast schedules and have not responded to discussion. Most recent and prolific offender is IP 69.118.194.22, with a recent edit from 24.0.102.136. Both IPs geolocate to New Jersey, so we've got a hard-headed editor forcing their POV. . Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Abhishek191288 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection: Please fully protect this page. I had my user name renamed from this to the current one, but I still see users posting here. — LeoFrank  Talk 11:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why do not you just redirect?--Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is/was, but some new editors are placing notices on the talk page, I am not sure how they would have gotten to that point, usually you have to put forth some degree of effort to edit a redirect. --kelapstick(bainuu) 19:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of bogus material by IPs. Would recommend protecting through June 11. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 17:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Requesting only for at least a week until E3 ends. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Salvidrim!. Pending changes protection applied for 1 month. — MusikAnimal talk 19:28, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of bogus material by IPs. Would recommend protecting through June 11. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 16:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Salvidrim! (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 19:02, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism following PP removal (again). ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of templates without discussion; unsourced edits with inappropriate tone, bad grammar and spelling; all through anonymous IPs that appear to represent a single user. Would recommend protecting for as long as possible as the edits are large in volume and high in frequency. KingHooves (talk) 17:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. by another admin. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 11:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandal at work. A day semi-protection will be enough to spoil the fun. The Banner talk 14:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., hopefully will be sufficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Highly visible page – This page has been moved twice now by editors who don't edit the article and aren't using the talk page. In epidemiology, outbreaks are named according to the year they start. With this particular disease, cases are continuing to be reported. That means in 6 months when it's 2015, we'll have a new round of page moves. It's becoming disruptive. I was thinking a move protection for one year would do it. Things will likely have slowed down by then. Thanks. . SW3 5DL (talk) 02:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, target (redirect) has been tagged so the article can't be moved to that location any more. Suggest discusisng with GeorgeGriffiths on his talk page. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Caoon (talk · contribs) The articles stated above are being deleted without proper explanation by TheLongTone (talk · contribs). They have been proven to have relevant information and corresponding sources, so the deletions are unjustified. I suspect his or her actions are a result of a bias to my newly created account rather then the accuracy of my information. I would appreciate your consideration to these articles. Thank you and much appreciated.

Declined, No request for protection, if you have an issue with a user, take it up with the user. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring, IP address keeps altering (even if minimally) sourced information. cyclopiaspeak! 11:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper with obvious COI repeatedly adding promotional speculation/rumour sourced only to Elizarova herself. See page history. Thomas.W talk 09:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous addition of unsourced content, changing sourced sales, adding original research. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial decision causing mass IP vandalism. Vacation9 05:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial decision causing mass vandalism. Vacation9 05:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial decision causing mass IP vandalism. Vacation9 04:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IPs Shyxcx (talk) 23:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#I_just_received_a_legal_threat_over_the_phone_about_Yank_Barry. R3ap3R (talk) 20:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done.Page is already semiprotected, although not indef. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:18, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A report from what is normally a reliable source IGN [27] but saying that the game has been cancelled from an "internal meeting" within Sony is extreme rumor mongering. Already IPs attacking the article. E3 is this week, if the cancellation is true we'll know within the week, so 1 week of semi-prot is requested. . MASEM (t) 05:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done done Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done tutterMouse (talk) 05:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Could I also ask for the same semi-prot on Team Ico (the core developers of the game), for the same reason? Thanks for the jump on this - a Sony rep has already reached out via twitter to counter the claim (eg: the game still is in dev) --MASEM (t) 06:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – slow moving edit war between established users, one of whom is using a long IP address out of texas. – S. Rich (talk) 00:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent removal of sourced content without edit summaries by IPs. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I give it 3 months. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 05:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC less effective in slowing down vandalism. George Ho (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users changing the wording to give advice (Wikipedia does not give advice). ViperSnake151  Talk  18:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses keep reinserting unsourced information that has been challenged for over a month. They/he/she do/es not engage in talk page discussion or notices on talk pages. Page was protected last week, but as soon as the protection was over, the IPs returned. Mohamed CJ (talk) 18:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:06, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Hezimmerman (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Permanent full protection: Hezimmerman (talk · contribs) (Howard Zimmerman) has passed away, so no new talk would be relevant on the user talk page. I suggest the current talk page content be archived first, before protection is applied. Protection would prevent pointless (due to being dead) notifications from showing up, and prevent those who expect the user to respond from being able to ask for a response, as no response will ever be forthcoming. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 11:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Talk pages of deceased Wikipedians are generally not protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:10, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Odd that protection would be asked for some two years after his death. tutterMouse (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 19:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done kelapstick(bainuu) 19:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, The purpose of full protection is to prevent edit warring. I see no indication that the edit warring will end. If you wish to have the grammar changed in the article you can use {{tl|edit protected}. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

09 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC not effective on this freq.-edit page. George Ho (talk) 22:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, PC is doing what PC does. -- kelapstick(bainuu) 12:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Either sockpuppetry or vandalism, but PC less effective on sockpuppetry. George Ho (talk) 22:40, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. In this case, PC is very effective on sockpuppetry. One IP edit since 28 May, come on now George.kelapstick(bainuu) 12:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC not effective enough. George Ho (talk) 22:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, PC is doing what PC does. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – None of IP edits is good enough to be constructive. George Ho (talk) 21:40, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Page is now just a list of subpages per consensus. See the hidden comment on the page. The past few months edits have only been to remove users who add individual creatures. . EvergreenFir (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Someone keeps attempting to whitewash the page. I have a feel it's the screenwriter himself. Can someone please protect the page ASAP?

This isn't the screenwriter, it's somebody concerned who knows the ins and outs and believee there isn't a fair dialog taking place. It seems somebody is anonymously attacking this page with malicious intent and without all the publicly available facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.58.102 (talk) 05:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, you've been removing the negative script reception to all of Arash Amel's movies. Citations have been given on every article, with heavy criticism for the scripts. You have a history of editing the Erased and Grace of Monaco pages and removing only the criticism (that has citations) of Arash Amel's scripts. Patently you have a conflict of interest because you are a fan or you are the screenwriter himself. As Mr Amel isn't a huge name, I'm going with the latter. Other users have agreed with me. Wikipedia doesn't allow whitewashing. Only a neutral point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.144.39.8 (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ma'am, you clearly have something against Mr Amel regardless of who you think I am (and again, I'm not him, just looking after his interests). I won't change it again because this is getting tiresome, so don't worry about protecting it or whatever. But you are not putting forward a neutral view as you haven't sourced all the available articles. That's all I ask. Wikipedia is more than just rottentomatoes. eg where is the coverage of the Grace of Monaco controversy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.58.102 (talk) 05:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Embarrassingly I didn't cite Rotten Tomatoes, even though the overall rating on their for both movies supports my other sources that the movies were woefully received with heavy criticism being aimed at scripts. I'm going to include the Cannes controversy on Mr Amel's page, you've reminded me to include the other articles about the script being completely fictitious. I have nothing against Mr Amel, I'm merely writing pages with a neutral view. You're attempting to whitewash Mr Amel's pages and take away any criticism from the scripts. That is called a conflict of interest, Sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.144.39.8 (talk) 06:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, you're still not presenting a fair and balanced view. I'm guessing you know him and have a problem with him, but we are getting somewhere, I've reinserted the stuff taken out previously without deleting anything, it's looking more balanced now and leave it at that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.58.102 (talk) 07:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're not actually. "Weinstein has frequently stated that the cut shown at Cannes was not in the spirit of the original screenplay." It doesn't mention that at all in the citation. Have you got proof that Weinstein said this or something to it's nature? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.144.39.8 (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Would you two please take this extensive discussion to the talk page? kelapstick(bainuu) 11:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection - Constant reverts asserting subject to be "Singaporean," despite no evidence, and no willingness to discuss on talk page nor leave edit summaries. Each revert is by a new IP. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 14:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Twice this has been created to promote and I won't be surprised If it's recreated again in couple of days, Thanks, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 12:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks kelapstick. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 12:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC ineffective on this freq.-edited article. George Ho (talk) 22:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We have one vandal edit per week. This is exactly what pending changes are for.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

temporary semi protection - newly released film with dozens of IP fanboys falsifying sources and pumping up its reception. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP hopping, removes info, refuses to go to the talk page.Ymblanter (talk) 10:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: There is literally no such thing as a constructive edit by IP editors and newly created accounts on this page. Within the article's edit history and its 170 individual revisions since November 2010, there has never been a single case where a constructive edit has been made by a non-autoconfirmed user. This has been a long-term issue, and every single time, over and over again, unreferenced modifications to infobox numbers have been made, with no one willing to provide credible sources to justify such edits. --benlisquareT•C•E 10:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am hesitant to indef semi a page that has never been protected previously. Two weeks. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Protection expired last week, a number of IPs wasted no time jumping right back into adding unsourced content, serious WP:POV issues, and blatant vandalism.LM2000 (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IPs (more than is readily apparent). Hoops gza (talk) 03:25, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Less than 16000 transclusions, no need for full protection. (Or if not semi, at least drop to template). The original protecting admin is no longer an admin, so I can't really ask them to do it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done kelapstick(bainuu) 12:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Player had moved to a traditional rival club. LRD NO (talk) 12:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Few IP socks are continuously vandalizing the article. Zayeem (talk) 11:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been a few attempts. I would rather protect it, and if possible, subsequent sandbox pages, as I feel as though it has been an issue. JustBerry (talk) 05:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by GorillaWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) tutterMouse (talk) 07:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - IP and new user vandalism resumed after end of last protection period. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 03:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please note protection levels of Supernatural costars Jensen Ackles and Jared Padalecki for comparison. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 03:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Severe content disputes between editors being eked out on talk page, along with a high level of IP vandalism and POV pushing. RGloucester — ☎ 22:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 70 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems to be mainly reverting IPs. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jamesx12345 22:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Suspected sockpuppet of NYCSlover at work. Ticks all the right boxes, like introducing a massive amount of links to disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 21:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting only for at least two weeks until the series ends. An IP has been consistently disrupting an acceptable template format. . KirtZJ (talk) 17:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Possible content dispute. No indication on talk page of an accepted episode template format. If there is consensus about this elsewhere on the wiki, inform the IP of this. The IP hopper also only edits about once a week. — MusikAnimal talk 19:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Article created by Me yesterday. EW on silly stuff by a user who thinks it's not notable after which I advised to nominate for deletion. And who refuses to understand the content of the article (i.e. that it is a publication that was founded as a newspaper and became a magzine only in 2005). Tachfin (talk) 15:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. — MusikAnimal talk 18:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Quite obviously needs a new level of protection considering the edits in June and May since protection had ended the previous time. Hoops gza (talk) 17:02, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption not nearly as rampant as it was when it was protected in early April. Some constructive edits from IPs, pending changes seems to be the most fitting. — MusikAnimal talk 19:12, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hoops gza (talk) 16:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There is a single IP exerting blatant vandalism, report them WP:AIV if they continue to disrupt. — MusikAnimal talk 19:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Peristent sock-puppetry and joking (i.e. "not in 2014"). FordorChevywhich1isbetter? (talk) 15:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Concerned users blocked. History reflects typical, constructive edits subject to WP:RY, as is expected with year articles. — MusikAnimal talk 19:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keep coming and change score completely unsourced (I believe dynamic IP). QED237 (talk) 12:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two IPs involved with these score changes. With constructive edits from other IPs, semi-protection does not seem ideal unless more disruption is observed. — MusikAnimal talk 18:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Although infrequent, IP edits have never been good lately. PC doesn't seem to stop bad edits. George Ho (talk) 21:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated removal of CSD tag by logged out user on a dynamic IP. - MrX 12:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Page deleted. No reason to salt the page as there have been no attempts to recreate it. — MusikAnimal talk 18:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated removal of CSD tag by logged out user on a dynamic IP. - MrX 12:02, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Page deleted. No reason to salt the page as there have been no attempts to recreate it. — MusikAnimal talk 18:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10 June 2014

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP-hopping editor. Have not requested temporary as first instance [28] was July 2013, not reverted [29] until 6 June 2014, and yet second (identical) instance [30] (the first of 12+ instances in the last 24 hours) was just two days later. 86.178.252.33 (talk) 00:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Vsmith (talk) 00:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent IP vandalism and few or no acceptable contributions from IP users. Sigeng (talk) 16:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: There seems to be a content dispute on whether to redirect the article to another article, given the fulfilled afd. Both editors are at three reverts and the discussion has token to edit summaries. An admin's intervention would be better appreciated than protection, but it would do its own justice nonetheless. Tutelary (talk) 03:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Redirect is at RfD, and it doesn't look like the target will change until then. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Just for the record, when I filed this request, there was no discussion other than edit summaries and no redirect discussion. This changed afterwards. Tutelary (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I know Tutelary, it just has to be tagged with an answer for bot archiving. --kelapstick(bainuu) 22:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Started up again shortly after the previous protection expired. DH85868993 (talk) 02:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One RVV and one Good Faith Edit. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, I don't actually believe that the penultimate edit was made in good faith. The edit essentially reverted the article to this revision from December 2012 plus the addition of some unsourced (and I believe incorrect) information. I find it difficult to believe that was done in good faith. DH85868993 (talk) 21:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so one edit of vandalism, and one not-so-good-faith-edit. It's still only two in the last week. --kelapstick(bainuu) 22:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. The Ranoclue (talk) 23:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 00:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Various edits have been made (which are either non-constructive, or in apparent good faith but erroneous) in the run-up to the World Cup. Mojo87 (talk) 21:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hoops gza (talk) 20:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Hoops gza, that user may be an issue coming up, better to report to AIV if he continues. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kelapstick Yes, but there have been six consecutive vandalism edits on the page by various accounts and IPs, which have had to be reverted. - Hoops gza (talk) 22:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh alright, Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I see it did just come off a long term semiprotection in april. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Today some users and IP addresses are attempting to change the stable version of the lead that does not fit their POV. Other IP and new users have made contentious changes in the past and likely will continue to do so in the future. Semi-protection is needed to avoid edit-warring and reverting. --UA Victory (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined At least one of the users you reverted is autoconfirmed, and I see that you are editing boldly as well. This is a content dispute, without (yet) edit-warring.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Given the contentious nature of this topic, it is prone to vandalism and other non-constructive edits. Should be indefinitely WP:Semi-protected in the same vein as the Sexual orientation, Heterosexuality and Homosexuality articles. I see no valid reason that the Bisexuality article should be an exception to such protection. Flyer22 (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Hoops gza (talk) 15:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected by not me. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Repeated removal of sourced WP:MEDRS-compliant content, and promotion of unverified medicinal claims. Note that this was previously subject to pending changes for 3 months - suggest 6 months this time? AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done six months it is Andy. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated restoration of unsourced and unencyclopaediac promotional content - there is a long history of this. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Andy, I think it might be better to block the new account that keeps putting in the long unsourced promotion piece, if they persist. And AfD may be better still for a bio of an architect claimed to be notable for "designs that he has proposed that remain unbuilt". In fact, I've put it there: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Tsui. Bishonen | talk 16:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Temporary semi protection - In last 24 hours, there has been vandalism, exhausted misinterpretation of sources, and edit warring by IPs,[31] very new accounts,[32],[33],[34],[35]. OccultZone (Talk) 13:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

11 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: A month of semi-protection might be useful. Last few weeks have seen a couple socks, lots of drive by adding of dubious or unsourced info, all from new users and IPs. I reverted one edit due to bad sources or I would just protect it myself. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 16:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 17:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Calidum Talk To Me 00:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I think the volume of constructive edits outweighs the small few unconstructive ones by such a margin as to mean page protection would be unfair at this stage. GedUK  12:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two users who have both been warned are continuing to perpetuate an edit war with their preferred revisions of this page. Both are way past 3RR and I've already reverted once myself. I've been trying to reason with the named editor after he asked for clarification about the warning I posted on their talk page but they have not followed my advice to stop warring. Now requesting admin assistance. Ivanvector (talk) 20:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. and User(s) blocked. GedUK  12:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 07:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent changes not supported by sources. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. third time protected - if any IP really wants to edit it we can review and unprotect then. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of disruption with World cup starting in two days (12 June), will probably be over after tournament finished 15 July. QED237 (talk) 00:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism from IPs (as one might expect). . jftsang 11:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. I'm discussing with that admin whether they actually meant to fully protect this. GedUK  12:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lead is constantly attacked by vandals in the hopes it will show up on Google search results. Please protect indefinitely. .  — TimL • talk 03:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 21:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Beyond My Ken (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection - An IP user (75.177.156.78) has taken to leaving me unwanted comments and unwarranted warnings (fallout from a recent dispute) despite my telling him not to post on my talk page. I'd like a short period of semi- to discourage him. Alternatively, an admin could instruct the IP that when someone asks you not to post on their talk page, unless you are required to do so by Wikipedia policy, it is disruptive to continue posting there, and can lead to being blocked from editing. Either works for me. BMK (talk) 23:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Three hours suit you BMK? --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sure, but you should note the comment below from the IP in question, which perhaps indicates an attempt to up-level to harrassment?

    (The biting a newbie warning was inappropriate. I told an IP editor not to put links to a revisionist Holocaust deniers' website in the EL section for Oradour-sur-Glane, an article about a French village whose entire population was murdered by Nazis. I said to the IP "There is no place on Wikipedia for "revisionist" histories of Nazi atrocities. Do not add these external links to the article again" and I will make that statement again to the next editor who tries to insert it, hoewver many edits they have. That the IP below thinks that this is "biting a newbie" is just sad, really.) BMK (talk) 23:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I invite anyone to examine BMK's tone in the newcomer edit. Regardless of how much BMK disagrees with the newcomer's point of view, the tone is harsh. He didn't bother to issue a standard level one or even level two warning template; he chastised the editor after that editor's second edit to Wikipedia. And as I said, it's not the first time BMK has engaged in this type of behavior. But this is not the appropriate venue for this discussion, so I will not respond any further here (although I suspect BMK won't be able to resist the temptation to antagonize anyone here who disagrees with him, especially an IP like me). 75.177.156.78 (talk) 23:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have no opinion about the page protection, but for the record, I left BMK a level-one warning for biting a newcomer. For more details, look in the page history and follow the link to the page where he bit the newcomer. And that was not the first time he did so. And also for the record, although he never told me not to post on his page, I am now aware that is his request; but I also must point out that legitimate, templated warnings are permissible even under those circumstances. Thank you. 75.177.156.78 (talk) 23:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
75.177, you are very close to being blocked yourself for disingenuous trolling; you need to cut your losses and move on. BMK responded to Nazi revisionism with a terse but civil warning. WP:BITE doesn't demand a shiny, happy, cheerful, warm welcome for editors – however 'new' – who repeatedly insert links to a Holocaust denier's website. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 00:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP making the same edit repeatedly. Trichinosis (talk) 19:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:43, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – There has been various moves of this article ever since it was renamed to the METRO Blue Line last year. This is a neutral title name and it even says METRO Blue Line on the official website [36] therefore this article should be protected from renaming until any disputes are resolved and everyone agrees on a appropriate title. JayJayWhat did I do? 16:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting semi create protection once C&P move of declined draft is deleted. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 22:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Should AfC pass at some point, no issues with unprotection. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hoops gza (talk) 21:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Before today it seems there were more constructive IP edits than malicious ones, so I'm hesitant to protect for much longer than that at the moment. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hoops gza (talk) 21:13, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Recent offender has been blocked, and otherwise the article seems relatively quiet. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fancruft and general disruption keeps returning. Last protection was two weeks. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism. This page is widely attacked by users and IPs and needs to be protected. Astros4477 (Talk) 15:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vandalism seems manageable. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Swarm of vandals attacking this article today. Dwpaul Talk 15:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Page keeps going back and forth between Carla Barlow and Carla Connor. Schoolskater (talk) 13:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Left a note on the talk page about consensus before moving again. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page sufferes persistent IP vandalism/deletion of sourced material whenever it is unprotected. Mostlyoksorta (talk) 10:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try three months for now. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:29, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent uncited, unexplained changes, especially to party philosophy. Davidelit (Talk) 10:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Constant reverts asserting subject to be "Indian," despite no evidence, and no willingness to discuss on talk page nor leave edit summaries. Each revert is by a new IP. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 10:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Yes same issues as yesterday's post. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi This article is a persistent target for teenaged fantasists. Philip Trueman (talk) 10:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian articles

Semi. IP bringing back an old POV war that the Iranian peoples should be called "Iranic" (a less common alt name) and not "Irano-Aryan" (another less common alt name). — kwami (talk) 06:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. each for on week. --kelapstick(bainuu) 11:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Over the last several weeks several IPs and a new user have repeatedly added promotional content and appear to have a conflict of interest. The last IP even attempted to "semi-protect" the page. Perhaps several weeks of stability will end this. I am One of Many (talk) 05:29, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very high level of vandalism in the last 48 hours. Please enforce semi-protection for at least a week. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 03:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note this just came off a one year semi. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Many good edits, but numerous disruptive edits as well. United States Man (talk) 01:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us start with this.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection: Persistent removal of important information. The page was protected 3 times. Gbold1 is autoconfirmed. The Ranoclue (talk) 01:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is obviously a content dispute, and both of you should follow the steps of dispute resolution rather than keeping the article protected at a random version.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Hoops gza (talk) 22:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How about pending changes? Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. applied "pending changes lite" for unregistered/autoconfirmed. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SMS Talk 17:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Although one IP still standing.kelapstick(bainuu) 22:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But this sock is on a dynamic IP range and keeps hopping IPs in case one is blocked. And he/she is following this page for quite sometime now. -- SMS Talk 14:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

12 June 2014

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 19:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 1 week. bibliomaniac15 20:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – This article has been subjected to frequent WP:BLP and WP:COPYVIOlations by new users and IP users. - MrX 19:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I set it for one year, if disruption continue, indefinite pending changes will be in order.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs and new users adding large swathes of unsourced content. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption. Volunteer Marek (talk) 18:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 2 weeks. bibliomaniac15 20:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Long-term problem with IP and occasional new-account editors (all known or presumed WP:COI adding uncited claims about public personalities, and now also adding overtly promotional content. DMacks (talk) 01:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Per User on talk page. This is getting out of hand, despite pending changes. United States Man (talk) 12:42, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined My apologies for not reacting earlier, but the peak of vandalism seems to have passed, and pending changes seem to be sufficient for the current level.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This article has a years-long history of very poor quality anon-IP edits (no sources, poor grammar, speculation, paragraph-long opinion pieces, lists, trivia, pretty much everything that doesn't belong in Wikipedia), interspersed with outright vandalism and spurious reversions to reinsert removed and inappropriate content. An editor recently did extensive work to remove bad elements, and anonymous IPs began to undo that work almost immediately, requiring yet another steady campaign of reverts by conscientious editors. A review of the article's history will demonstrate the need for an indefinite padlock for non-registered users. Universaladdress (talk) 01:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should be plenty of time. I don't 'do' indef protection. Bearian (talk) 14:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced inflation of numbers, addition of unsourced material and addition of material with fake reference by IPs. Thomas.W talk 17:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism - the user 'Carioca' make vandalism all day, he change her name, the real name of actress Alinne Moraes is Jaqueline, but the user 'Carioca' changes to 'Aline' with no references.

Declined If someone is adding unsourced info, this is you.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 2+ week block. Notable American subject is in the news [37] as he is presumably on the verge of death. High profile for vandalism. Just reverted some. Requesting protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed for at least a couple of weeks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 06:12, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Once, a vandalism occurred in this article by an IP, but you can't find it now, as the page has a million or more contributions. This is a very serious article and we would not like people to fool around and make vandalism here. Actually, I'm surprised it's not protected. It would hurt feelings if vandalism occur at the article, and we would not like that. Sometimes, unreferenced material would be placed there. I have added the "Good article", which once again, surprisingly nobody added, and now I'm requesting for a page protection. I hope you guys would understand. Nahnah4 | Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! | No Editcountitis! 08:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. We do not pre-emptively protect articles. In this case, there was some IP vandalism going on for a week, so I semi-ed it for two weeks. If vandalism resumes after two weeks, please reapply.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Stephen Colbert just vandalized this on the show. We should lock down to prepare for the fans. ~ neko-chan :3 (talk) 03:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. and in the wrong section (asking for protection rather than a downgrade) tutterMouse (talk) 06:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent addition of unsourced and original research material. This page has been temporarily been blocked before, yet these edits keep coming. (If not indefinite, then a lengthy temporary protection is requested.). Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 03:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent joke additions/vandalism. Jinkinson talk to me 00:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 03:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 20:48, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dreadstar ☥ 23:05, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chunk5Darth (talk) 22:57, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dreadstar ☥ 23:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Was briefly protected by Kelapstick following continuous removal of AfD tags. The protection has ended and it's started right back up again. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 20:42, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BencherliteTalk 20:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Agenda-pushing IP editor refusing to discuss on talk. There was a recent talk page discussion about this content, and pushing a very minor agenda in the WP:LEDE is WP:UNDUE and inappropriate, as is ignoring the talk page and referring to other people's edits as vandalism while edit-warring to push a minority POV. - Aoidh (talk) 22:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aoidh you are the one who have the agenda, you are destroying my contributions which are rule-based. Here is the rule (again) for you: Format of the first sentence. 87.78.28.25 (talk) 22:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Given that nothing in that link comes anywhere close to supporting the idea that WP:LEDE and WP:UNDUE can be ignored to push an extremely minor POV, and that the lede, especially the lede sentence, is for summarizing the article, your edits are purely disruptive to the article given that you are edit-warring to push that edit and refusing to discuss on the article's talk page, let alone get any consensus for the edit. - Aoidh (talk) 22:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, As it's only one IP, I don't want to protect the article. I've warned them again. If it happens again, report them to WP:3RNN GedUK  12:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This did happen again this morning from a second IP. Both IPs appear to trace to netcologne.de. Objective3000 (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Both IPs are me. But nice how you got suppressed a term used for a topic already 11 years ago. Happy POV pushing to you! 78.35.218.47 (talk) 18:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

13 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the past week, IP editors have continued to restore a racist, anti-Arabic quote. The quote first appeared in September 2012, but was first removed much more recently, although it should have been removed long ago. Now, these IPs are leaving edit summaries which contain personal attacks, so this ought to be reason enough for this page to be semi-protected for at least a while. Dustin (talk) 00:41, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Until 1 July. Player signed a contract for a transfer today and the fans of that side want to apply it immediately rather than wait until the transfer is in effect: 1 July. Lock until that time please. . Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:14, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs (I believe he/she is a blocked user) keep vandalising the article, removing sourced additions again and again. He/she or they don't listening the warnings and offers.Yagmurlukorfez (talk) 22:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 11:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An editor doesn't like the sourced statement in the article and so has been changing "Secular Islam", which is what the subject identifies with, to "Islam" despite proof on the talk page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:12, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If it is protected, please do so with the referenced "religion" in place. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., looks to me like a content dispute.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP users are treating this organization as an acutal 'state' which is not. It does not comply wit the declarative theory of statehood but they don't care. elmasmelih (used to be KazekageTR) 21:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. There are good IP edits, in this situation pending changes is a much better solution.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:34, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated change of sourced caste relationship (Rajput) to one that is unsourced (Gurjar/Gujjar) by a bunch of anons. I think this is is either a meatpuppet situation - it has happened before and is also going on at Prithviraj Chauhan, which has pending changes in place. The community seemed sometimes to co-ordinate their efforts via Orkut, although I can no longer access that. Sitush (talk) 20:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see Talk:Chauhan#Semi-protected. If it were me, I'd slap an indef protection on this thing but I know that there are not many people who like to use that. - Sitush (talk) 06:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 19:40, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Temporary semi-protection: Excessive genre changing without sources. Suggest semi-protecting this page until additional sources show up so the album's genre or genres can be defined. 121.72.62.84 (talk) 10:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 11:31, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The article has had several vandalism or unsourced material. This article is very serious, so we do not want other people to make fun of it. It should be permanent till the plane is found. Nahnah4 | Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! | No Editcountitis! 07:35, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. (15 days) --Ekabhishektalk 11:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Indefinite semi-protection: The articles layout is being changed without discussion. There have been many previous protections, but the Ips return. They add unsourced programmes and unnecessary headings. 66.87.83.132 (talk) 10:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like you are edit-warring against several editors.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article has been repeatedly vandalized by multiple IP socks of User:Bertrand101 since it was created last May 31. Bertrand101 usually adds a bunch of hoax TV shows (usually a news program or a film from the 1980's) in the artist's filmography section, and adds a self-created video that he uploaded from YouTube, or his blog as source. See 1, 2, 3 and a LTA case against Bertrand for evidence. -WayKurat (talk) 06:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing by multiple IPs/socks. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 05:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Needs to be protected, and the IP was given a full explanation of the situation at User talk:Alex Bakharev, but I will not do it myself since some users would think of me as an involved administrator.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant changes to the band's heading. Because they're a deathcore band and IP addresses for some reason keep changing this. Second Skin (talk) 04:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) No sources are cited and this looks like a content dispute. Peter James (talk) 12:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I think constant is over stating it, and as mentioned above, there aren't any sources for the version that's already there. That would be a better next step. GedUK  11:17, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some users do not follow the purpose of list. They keen add non English and promoting websites. AntonTalk 03:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined With all due respect, I do not see how the current level of vandalism can justify semi-protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:12, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, started a few days ago but seriously increased today. ubiquity (talk) 16:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bibliomaniac15. (2 weeks) tutterMouse (talk) 09:26, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: An episode yesterday in which users tried to seek indefinite semi-protection yesterday ended with a day's full protection, as we reverted an IP vandal inserting satirical content so many times that it looked like an edit war. The IP, who also attacked my user page, is now editing from a new account, but has left a "paper trail" in that he put his name in his IP edits and his user name. This page attracts constant trouble due to the controversy of its subject. '''tAD''' (talk) 15:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MusikAnimal. (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 09:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Long-term problem with IP and occasional new-account editors (all known or presumed WP:COI adding uncited claims about public personalities, and now also adding overtly promotional content. DMacks (talk) 01:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. weka (talk) 22:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Mike V • Talk 00:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes on a BLP by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 20:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Switched to semi-protection due to the frequency of the vandalism. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 22:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection (full if needed) -- edit warring, of which I'll freely admit that I'm a part. I had no idea where else to turn. All I did was reinstate the episode summaries as they were before they were removed last year, and an IP keeps removing them. I revert the IP, he reverts me. Next thing you know, he attacks me in the edit summaries. Need help to resolve this NOW, before I lose my mind. If this isn't the place, someone please point me in the right direction. Black Yoshi (Yoshi! | Yoshi's Eggs) 20:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected. bibliomaniac15 20:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, this should let me calm down for a bit. Black Yoshi (Yoshi! | Yoshi's Eggs) 20:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
EDIT: IP has now taken to reverting my comments on the talkpage, saying they are "useless" and "invalid." Black Yoshi (Yoshi! | Yoshi's Eggs) 21:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

14 June 2014

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that I may carry out the existing edit request. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 20:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done @Technical 13: - I've lowered it for 24 hours from now, but ping me when done and I can re-fullprotect then. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done my bad - I keep forgetting about that level. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Full protection, or even template protection, is overkill with only 17 transclusions. My request to the protecting admin was archived without response. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Set to template, if someone wants to lower it further, no worries here. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent disruptive editing and BLP violations by User:Littletfiosfan6614. IPadPerson (talk) 17:05, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I found no BLP violations, merely unsourced additions of films and roles. The talk page has not been used since May. Articles are never full-protected indefinitely. Diannaa (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Insertion of unsourced BLP violations by IP addresses. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP user continues to input information that is in clear violation of WP:Crystal. Plot Spoiler (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Looks like content dispute to me.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:12, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dennis Bratland (talk) 14:21, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. by another admin. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:27, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: All of the pages edited by Nangparbat's sock accounts (Ektakapoor372, 86.159.10.137, Shamaniez) recently. --RaviC (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Those are not confired socks and even if they were, we are not going to protect all pages they ever edited. That would be pre-emptive protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:34, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection IP block evasion by TheREALCableGuy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Nate • (chatter) 01:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Disruptive editing seems to be over for the time being, and there are good IP edits.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:36, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well of course it'll be over when you take a day and a half to respond. Sorry to say it, but pick up the pace with these RFP requests and recruit more admins to take action on them so we don't have to drag them over to ANI and get a 'we'll do it but this is the wrong venue' lecture. Nate • (chatter) 02:05, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well of course, the correct venue is AN but I know your point. tutterMouse (talk) 06:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

15 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of maintenance templates without solving the problem they refer to. Jetstreamer Talk 14:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection IPs (all from London) adding information that can't be verified. Might be vandalism. Attempts to verify, attempts to contact IPs, have been unsuccessful. -- GreenC 14:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request for page protection for at least two weeks due to vandalism. Article was protected before for one week; expired on June 11, 2014. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 06:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent biased edits, including removal of material that is critical of the subject.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 19:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 19:13, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 19:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Semi-protection: Of 50 most recent edits, I see only one positive contribution, by an autoconfirmed user. Everything else is vandalism or otherwise unhelpful edits by IP's or the like, and reverts of same. The similar List of hacker groups is already under long-term semi-protection. Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 17:13, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems reasonable to give it the same as List of hacker groups. Bishonen | talk 19:24, 15 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Temporary edit warring with no discussion on talk page. 188.74.96.138 (talk) 16:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

youre the one introducing new changes without dissussing them on the talkpage and you definitely broke 3rr as well 95.199.198.59 (talk) 17:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
the changes you are making is disruptive and vandalises the long standing version 95.199.198.59 (talk) 17:22, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and adding of WP:OR information by a dynamic IP user (a user who claims that each IP is a different user, while it is clearly the same one) --Omar-toons (talk) 01:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page does indeed need to be protected, but the protection required is from the disruptive edits of Omar-toons. This user has acted consistently in the following negative ways:
1) Refusing to seek consensus or even discuss matters in the Talk page, user has insisted on making sweeping edits to a page whose content had been settled for a very long period of time, namely Pan-Arab colors. When user was urged to use Talk for this purpose, he refused, only using Talk at a later stage for two very specific, peripheral page issues and not for the main essence of his page-wide edits.
2) Changing page intro text with no explanation, then consistently reverting any and all edits to the page intro (again, with no explanation). User is a non-native English speaker, and, while of course this should not preclude him editing on Wikipedia, it can lead to a poorer quality of prose. The page intro (as of the last edit), the one that user seeks to delete, was not composed by a single editor with a single edit, but collaboratively by users over numerous edits to reach its current state. The English is superior, the facts are better presented, and, as alluded to earlier, it is in line with the settled text that had existed for a long period of time. User has refused to explain any of his edits to the page intro, or raise them on Talk.
4) Accusations of OR. User has made these accusations repeatedly, but refused to expand upon them in the edit summaries of his reversions. One would imagine that if user was genuinely concerned with OR, to the extent that it motivates him to continually revert edits by anyone else, he would take pains to point out what the alleged OR is. Instead, user has chosen to edit war. The only element of which one can think is his assertion regarding the Flag of Libya, however, it is noted that a reference has been inserted for this, so user's motivation seems purely negative.
5) False accusations of sock puppetry. A user making use of a sock puppet is a serious offence, not merely because of the damaging effect that it can have on the editing process, but because of the breach of trust between that particular user and the rest of the Wikipedia community. By the same taken, accusing a user of making use of a sock puppet is an extremely serious charge, and should never be made lightly, or as a means of winning an edit war. Wikipedia editing rules prohibit a single user from making use of different accounts in order to get around things like the 3RR, and win edit wars. However, they do not prohibit several users who share the same view on the merits of particular edits to seek to protect those edits from disruptive users. Indeed, a collaborative approach to editing is one of the hallmarks of the Wikipedia process (when it is abided by). Rather than any sock puppetry, you will find that this is exactly what has happened in this instance. Perhaps if we check the geographical locations of all IP addresses from which edits to the Pan-Arab colors page have been edited, we may gather sufficient evidence to determine that it is impossible for any sock puppetry to have occurred (unless we intend to introduce a new rule that precludes more than one user editing from a single population centre, district, or neighbourhood. One suspects that Omar-Toons (the user in question) has already performed such an IP address check, and found no evidence to support his claims, which is why he has offered no evidence whatsoever.
In addition to an absolute absence of evidence, Omar-Toons has failed to offer an explanation of what purpose sock puppetry would serve in this instance. As far as a I can see, at no time has a single user (other than Omar-Toons himself) been close to any kind of violation of the Wikipedia rules in his or her own right that would require the use of a forbidden sock puppet. Again, the lack of explanation and evidence from Omar-Toons speaks volumes about the true intent of his accusations.
6) Edit warring. At a certain point in a dispute between several users, it becomes obvious to everyone operating in good faith that seeking an end to the dispute through the Talk page is essential. Aside from (at a late stage) the two peripheral issues already noted, Omar-Toons has refused to use the Talk page for this purpose, choosing instead to pursue an ill-tempered edit war. If genuine cooperation with other users was his desire, he simply would not have conducted himself in this fashion.
I am entirely confident that if one compares the different edits on the page, Omar-Toons' disruptive, bad faith misconduct shall be evident to all. Indeed, having briefly examined his behaviour on other pages, it seems that Omar-Toons has a habit of edit warring, and attempting to wear out other users through his consistent, disruptive edits. Moreover, if one compares the intro text of the last edit to intro text of Omar-Toons' edits, the difference in the quality of English, and in the way that the subject matter is discussed will also be obvious.
I ask for Omar-Toons to be sanctioned for the misconduct mentioned above, and for the page (as of the most recent non-Omar-Toons edit) to be protected.
Thank you. 2.28.240.160 (talk) 10:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:24, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JDDJS (talk) 15:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:14, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Have an acceptable draft at Draft:Show N Prove that requires unprotection of this page to accomplish. (I have the wikiprojects, categories, and BLP data all ready to hit "accept" in another window). Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 16:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done kelapstick(bainuu) 16:13, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit-warring. Addition of unsourced nmaterial to the BLP. . Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 04:15, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:57, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors and new users to a BLP. STATic message me! 22:12, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an autoconfirmed editor; PC might suffice as well. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 19:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.: fully protected for one day by Spartaz. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Various IPs are creating disruption in this wp:BLP (he plays currently in the soccer World Championship). I believe that 7 days semi will be ok.Alexikoua (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:02, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IP socks from Georgia edit-warring adding POV political edit at the lead against consensus. Master 108.84.26.45 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) was blocked yesterday due to violation of 3RR. The article is about a current event and needs temporary protection. . Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 17:47, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bbb23. -Ekabhishektalk 03:24, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption, same person/IP who's activity led to protection of Siege of Sloviansk. Volunteer Marek (talk) 17:43, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 17:14, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'd need to see more reverts being necessary before protecting at this stage.

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Highly profiled living musician whose public persona is continually within the public eye. Highly prone to vandalism. livelikemusic my talk page! 17:13, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's start with this.. --Ekabhishektalk 03:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring by Albanian IP hopper. Areaseven (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The history should be enough, editors are continuously reverting malicious IPs adding fraud, false, and BLP violating information. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 03:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP-hopper repeatedly adding unsourced/badly-sourced material. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:39, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Full-protection: Ongoing vandalism to page. Multiple additions from both Ip and named editors including false reports of article namesakes death. Amortias (T)(C) 16:26, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'll keep an eye on it and block account if they continue. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recently there are continuous User vandalism such as misinterpretation, emotive and personal comments on the page by Ol king col.Techtrek (talk) - needs investigating as valid material is being removed by Techtrek. Suspected self promotion/conflict of interest and no attempt has been made to resolve issues between users.

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: IP users engage in edit warring and keep adding un sourced content in the page. Ruddah (talk) 16:14, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.: two day semi by Go Phightins!. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:34, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Several COI IPs and editors latest one remove cited material and add party line material to article. Murry1975 (talk) 13:35, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP user engages in edit warring. Removes content per WP:IDL. This page was semi-protected for two times in the past. Laitr Keiows (talk) 13:34, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: Laitr Keiows, looks to me like they are removed unreferenced material which is well within the rules. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page with the IP. If the edit warring continues report it to the edit warring noticeboard. . Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recently there are continuous attempt of either IP/ User vandalism such as page blanking, misinterpretation, personal comments on the page.Sunaina Kunju (talk) 13:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:28, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, by misrepresenting a source, violating WP:BLP in the process. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 08:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:39, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit war resumed immediately after protection expired Jim1138 (talk) 06:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 03:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued disruptive unsourced changes by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 01:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Apparent content dispute, with several IPs edit warring to remove content per WP:IDL. JNW (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it seems most likely that a single user is adopting different accounts in order to push a pov. Any assistance would be appreciated. JNW (talk) 05:31, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. by another admin. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A newly created account 2-days account [[38]] displays stubborn wp:OWN & edit-warring from the start after account creation (not to mention some trolling in various talkpages). Semi protection appears the only solution to convince him become familiar with dispute resolution procedure. A 3 day semi protection will be ok.Alexikoua (talk) 20:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unneccesary request. No edit warring. There is continuing discussion on Talk:Menemen talkpage. User makes problematic edits, already reported it for that on noticeborad. Alexikoua tries to misuse this measure to get me banned in the meantime and then freely continue with problematic edits. User is not interested in discussion, seeks this as a way to silence other editors. Willingly distorts the article. Dunderstrar (talk) 08:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If that doesn't work then report at the edit warring noticeboard. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page keeps being recreated by user with conflict of interest. Breawycker (talk to me!) 20:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Given it's only one user blocking would be more appropriate if they continue. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous edit warring from a user who seems to be using various IPs, but who I suspect is just one of many sockpuppets of User:SuperNepoznat. They've been reverted by many different editors, but judging from their stubborn POV pushing edits and the complete lack of any form of communication from them, it doesn't seem like they'll stop this behaviour anytime in the coming weeks. CodeCat (talk) 18:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced additions being added by anons. JMHamo (talk) 17:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One problematic user was recently blocked by another admin. Diannaa (talk) 21:11, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

16 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users continue to add fake names to spouse and add personal life. LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP sockpuppetry continuing DOB conflict of banned user. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 19:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:44, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very few good edits from IP editors. Jamesx12345 18:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 17:08, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 20:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Sustained biased editing, vandalism, gossip, and promotion from fans. All of the problematic edits come from new accounts. Also, constant addition of non-free images that are almost immediately deleted. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I was browsing recent changes and i noticed a full blown edit war on this page, protection requested due to edit war between User:Inhakito and User:Lugnuthemvar and possibly User:NBAkid. Retartist (talk) 23:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warned first two users. Retartist (talk) 23:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Let's see if they continue after the warnings. If they do please report to WP:ANEW as blocking will be the likely response. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism due to controversial loss. Have already corrected a few items. Gabe1972 (talk) 06:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Shirt58 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 16:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Removal of important contents. RRD13 (talk) 04:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 11:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm happy that pending changes is working well enough. Might be better to discuss this with the protecting admin as well. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: To allow template editors to edit. Steel1943 (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Callanecc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) tutterMouse (talk) 10:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting temporary protection of my sandbox, due to fancruft editing from a disruptive IP, who is acting in a non-civil manner after being requested to stop the edits they were making. livelikemusic my talk page! 18:15, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let me know if you'd like it longer or shorter. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes privilege by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 17:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:23, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: High level of unsourced content being added, removed, and readded by editors with IPs and accounts, resulting in edit war. -- Wikipedical (talk) 16:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not treating it as an edit war yet, but if it gets worse I will. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 16:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until end of the team's involvement in the World Cup due to vandalism. C679 20:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Smalljim. (24 hours) tutterMouse (talk) 07:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 80.47.243.22283.110.100.100 Hanibal911 (talk) 20:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think this is the third time I have requested PP for this list. An IP hopper is constantly vandalizing the page despite warnings. See the edit history and the Hopper's talk pages. I suggest 3-4 weeks of PP. . KirtZJ (talk) 16:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection, IPs have not been adding anything useful. 117Avenue (talk) 04:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 20:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

17 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP vandalism. 7 instance of recent vandalism all by IP, no contribution. Jyoti (talk) 09:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's quite infrequent, but substantial when it happens. I think PC would do a better job than semi in this case, as it's a first protection and it'll need a fairly long one to cover the infrequency. GedUK  12:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism following the game's leak. fivexthethird (talk) 08:40, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistant vandalism to infobox by ip editors. John from Idegon (talk) 03:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by Materialscientist.. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – I'd like to standardize this for HTML5 and do some general cleanup to improve performance. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 11:52, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. GedUK  12:27, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism, constant removals of sourced content. OlegSmirnov (talk) 09:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bencherlite.. tutterMouse (talk) 10:27, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism over the past week from new users, including a sock puppet of MariaJayHicky and possible Wikihounding by HomieG-man. Dan56 (talk) 05:28, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is already Semi-protected up until November by EdJohnston so not much to do beyond an admin upping it to full which seems unlikely. As all the vandalism is from autoconfirmed socks you should report them to WP:SPI or WP:AIV. tutterMouse (talk) 07:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Dan56: There is a possibility that if you take this to WP:AN pending changes level 2 might be authorised but that can't be done on this noticeboard. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dwpaul Talk 02:32, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Scored the winning goal and vandalised a few times since. Telfordbuck (talk) 00:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Foxj (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) tutterMouse (talk) 06:28, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User:DukeWellington insists on changing the denomination of Pinochet's government in the article of his minister Piñera, to a "regime", instead of a "dictatorship". This latter use is consensual, see discussion on the article on the Military dictatorship of Chile (1973-90). Diego Grez (talk) 22:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Too infrequently edited to warrant protection. Appears to be a ownership of article related issue. Reporting to AN/I is probably best, if need be. — MusikAnimal talk 00:53, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 22:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As there the edit rate to too high for pending changes at the moment. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:44, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – various IPs persist in adding unsourced incorrect information regarding the status of a couple of station staff, who are still listed as employed on the corporate website. Echoedmyron (talk) 21:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Disruptive activity in question appears to be from a single IP. — MusikAnimal talk 00:40, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Regular target of negative, unsourced edits by IPs. The Banner talk 16:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. All of the recent vandalism appears to be from the same IP. Report to WP:AIV if disruption continues. — MusikAnimal talk 00:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple instances of vandalism on high-profile, recently announced game. czar ♔ 20:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 00:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 00:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 01:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player is to change club 1 July but many keeps change lot of info now and change unsourced info to BLP. . QED237 (talk) 22:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 01:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – various IPs persist in adding unsourced programs to the article while claiming [User_talk:Spshu#Disney_XD_.28Australia.29|TV Guide as an appropriate source]]. Now claims, I hate Disney. (The talk page also indicates a two previous semi-protection periods for the article.) Spshu (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. due to edit warring primarily involving IPs. Edits in question appear to be in good-faith. @Spshu: You should make yourself aware of the three-revert rule and proper use of rollback. — MusikAnimal talk 00:48, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Post on Reddit with &gettingStartedReturn=true resulting in Getting Started edit suggestions... [39]. Cloudchased (talk) 20:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 00:32, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection Nimrod Kamer has been a "professional satirist" (troll) on Wikipedia for about 9 years using Wikipedia as a platform for public stunts (see refs in article). Most recently he has been using IPs out of London (where he lives) to continually add non-notable material about himself and send messages to friends (eg. [40]) Talk page engagement are met with silence.[41] A semi-protection will force him to use accounts (probably SPAs, which can be re-evaluated later if needed). A temporary probably won't work to dissuade this persistent and experienced editor. -- GreenC 17:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's not fair to shut out anonymous and unregistered users because of one troll who infrequently edits his own article. — MusikAnimal talk 00:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ever since his win against Brendan Schaub, the page has had a high level of vandalism, specifically in the record box, have corrected his record about three times already. TheGoldenSamurai (talk) 17:44, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 00:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continual multiple IP vandalism. Sam Walton (talk) 07:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 00:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Keeps being targeted by IP's edit-warring and refusing to start talk page discussions after they have been repeatedly reverted/challenged on their edits. Somchai Sun (talk) 21:54, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 00:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Disruptive editing An anonymous IP keeps removing content from various sections without leaving explanation in edit-summaries.--Harout72 (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 20:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

18 June 2014

Talk:Chile national football team (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 21:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Mike V • Talk 21:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:SkaterLife (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection. SkaterLife (talk) 15:28, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined WP:UPROT does not apply to user talk pages. Not enough disruptive activity to warrant semi-protection. — MusikAnimal talk 16:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Kierzek (talk) 13:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 15:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 194.15.138.11 (talk · contribs). Bearian (talk) 15:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism to User page. TRL (talk) 15:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — MusikAnimal talk 16:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected (you're an admin, do it right!) tutterMouse (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, though it's clear now why the bot would complain. I failed to infer {{subst:RFPP/sandbox|s}} could be used instead of {{subst:RFPP/sandbox|s|N}} as the latter does not apply :) — MusikAnimal talk 18:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's true but it's a learning curve, no harm done! tutterMouse (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. SkaterLife (talk) 15:28, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — MusikAnimal talk 16:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected tutterMouse (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: There is no evidence of persistent vandalism in the history. StudiesWorld (talk) 10:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I disagree. There is. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Question: Where? meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 14:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection (level 2): High level of copyright violations and vandalism. MATRIXXXXX (talk) 08:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous disruptive edits and additions of original content. There are 4-6 of such edits per day. Even though there is a pending change protection(which I wish to keep indefinitely even if this request is accepted), editors find it an obstacle to passing the ongoing GA review. Therefore I propose a semi-protection till 22 September, 2014, as it is very likely that the vandals are schoolgoers who are interested in the film.Forbidden User (talk) 06:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, There seem to be plenty of constructive and accepted IP edits as well. To be honest, this is at the top end of edit counts for me to want PC on, but as it's there and seems to be working, I think that's enough protection at the moment. GedUK  12:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There was an IP user who cause quite a bit of trouble, since he was blocked content dispute lingers. I think a bit of protection might cool some heads. . ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 04:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, The IP blocked seems to have ended it; everything after that was just setting things back down. GedUK  12:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by sock users. — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ʜᴜʜ? 09:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Doesn't have the protection history to go indef at this stage. Relist if it neeeds it again afterwards. GedUK  12:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long history of brand-new SPAs turning up and starting minor wars. . Stuartyeates (talk) 07:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --GedUK  12:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Cold fusion (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing of talk page by IPs who may be sockpuppets. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined At this point they seem to be engaging a little better, and equally it's only one IP this month so better to take action against them if necessary. --GedUK  11:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jamesx12345 12:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks perfect for pending changes to be honest. Let's give it a month and see how it goes, and then extend if necessary. Levels are quite low and patchy really, so semi is probably less effective. GedUK  12:27, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very few good edits from IP users. Jamesx12345 07:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:15, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent additions of unsupported info on BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 07:28, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism, the edits are also similar so I suspect that some may be hoppers here. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 11:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Unlikely that this topic will ever be notable and it has been deleted twice. Andrew327 10:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:58, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Multiple (19 since last revision) cases of persistent IP vandals, with article poorly monitored by registered users. LRD NO (talk) 08:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: frequent unsourced (and inadequate) edits from IPs and new users.LM2000 (talk) 03:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:06, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism (addition of unsourced/untrue content) under a variety of IP addresses. Has been going on for months. Article has been temporarily semi-protected in the past - the vandalism always restarts shortly after the article is unprotected. I can't recall a valid edit from an IP editor since March 2013. DH85868993 (talk) 22:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(to save people having to look up the details) I requested semi-protection on the 9th of June and the request was declined later that day due to insufficient recent activity. Subsequently, there have been 15 IP/vandalism edits in the past 5 days. DH85868993 (talk) 23:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:05, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: If not indefinite a long long time. Article was created by the subject has socked via several accounts [[42]], [[43]] and a few IPS recently [[44]] edit summary . This is also interesting [[45]] where he refers to himself in the third person. SPI will not connect ip's to the account but when you looked at Croonerman history first he was evans, then he was his cousin, then just a fan. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 19:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC). Hell in a Bucket (talk) 19:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how we go for 6 months. The most recent IP has been blocked for a month as well (by someone else). --GedUK  11:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow moving edit war between two users on a guideline; both autoconfirmed. . Tutelary (talk) 19:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Since it's only between two users, I've given both of them warnings for edit warring. Blocks can be issued if it keeps up. Mike V • Talk 00:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive edits and additions of original content. It has become a daily issue. – Recollected • 17:34, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very few good edits from IP users and most of these edits are unfounded and lead extensive damage. Also great harm for this template applied some new editors who do not follow the rules of editing and engaged in frank vandalism. Hanibal911 (talk) 10:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:08, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandals. Mophedd (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Looks like mainly one IP that's causing disruption. If more IPs become involved feel free to request again. — MusikAnimal talk 21:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant removals of sourced content, simply because IP addresses don't agree with the sound of the band. Second Skin (talk) 05:12, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only twice this month, it's not that bad. GedUK  12:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – No need for full protection. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Mike V • Talk 17:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

19 June 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: User page vandalized by several IPs recently. Indefinite as this in userspace. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 07:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, let him ask for semi-protection himself, if he wants it. Currently, there is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protecting the page without request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 17:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy Anonymous IP vandalism recently. Please protect. Backendgaming (talk) 01:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some but certainly not all IP edits have been constructive. I am hoping that a week is sufficient. Bearian (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. czar ♔ 01:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – None too good lately. George Ho (talk) 03:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I looked at the history of trolling and vandalism by 'fan boys' and have concluded that a long-term semi-protection is needed, so I was bold. Bearian (talk) 16:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of unsourced or poorly sourced content by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 21:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – You can see edit warring by wasifwasif with me and another editor. Once S/he copied from older version and overwrote all intermediate edits. He has been trying to insert one statement regarding Perumal from a story book and a blog and another book that does not have any isbn number or known publisher. I presented him contradictory info from a reliable academic source. He ignores that and inserts with another reference that probably took content from wikipedia like site itself (acknowledged in the book). He has reverted four times now I think. He has been quite uncivic on talk page also making accusation and wiki lawyering of taking to noticeboard, which both me and the other editor welcome. If this page is protected the constant reverts can stop and we may continue on talk page or s/he may chose to gather consensus via specific noticeboard as s/he claims. Jyoti (talk) 17:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, If it's one editor warring, report them to WP:3RRN GedUK  12:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unreliable sources plus no discussions at talk page regarding the matter. Jetstreamer Talk 16:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Drop protection for  Template editors, please. meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 13:59, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 10:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. There is no mass-attack, and John can protect himself against slow vandalism if appropriate. Materialscientist (talk) 10:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs every couple days for the past several months, at least. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:06, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous protections month long, let's start with this..and revisit if needed subsequently. --Ekabhishektalk 13:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 21:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created with the same content. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 11:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.. GedUK  12:11, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. NeilN talk to me 07:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page continues to be a target of vandalism immediately after 24 hr pp-vandalism expired today. Dwpaul Talk 02:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: On three fronts really. Player has had a poor World Cup and is receiving vandalism from IPs and new accounts as a result. Either through being unfamiliar with Wikipedia rules or in spite, his nationality has been changed numerous times recently by IPs and new accounts. Also, he is in negotiations for a move to another team, IPs and new accounts are repeatedly putting this as his current team although he has not officially signed for them yet. '''tAD''' (talk) 23:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

create protected (salted): User removing speedy tags again and again, creating same page Bin Dawood Group of Companies from different SP accounts. User has also been reported here. Need full page protection till the SP issue solved. Thanks . A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 08:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by JohnCD (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) tutterMouse (talk) 09:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant target for vandalism. In the past 50 edits, only two have not been vandalism or reverting vandalism, and those two were additions of a category and a navigation template. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:57, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Mike V • Talk 21:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption, BLP issues. Removal of well sourced information and addition of negative, badly sourced info - a BLP violation. Comments by the IP in the edit summary suggest a WP:NOTHERE problem (they're convinced that anyone who removes the negative information being added must be a paid employ of Mr. Sikorski).Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Bearian (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You've got to be kidding me! Volunteer Marek (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

20 June 2014

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:58, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Bishonen | talk 20:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent and serious BLP vandalism from Anons and New Users. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 16:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to second this request. Its getting hit frequently and one bad edit stood almost a day.--Milowent • hasspoken 18:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:58, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 10:08, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The "vandalism" was actually a dispute over the uncertainty of England in the tournament. It has subsided and once the ITA vs CRC game is over in five minutes, it will be a moot point. Mike V • Talk 17:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep changing the infobox entry for the owner. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:59, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm a Braves fan, but this has got to stop. Those are people who don't have good intentions. --McDoobAU93 17:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 18:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 15:43, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Lord Roem. Mike V • Talk 17:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. They are caused by a recent ruling against Argentina, so surely some days would be enough. Cambalachero (talk) 18:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent copyright violations have continued since expiry of the last protection on 5 June. Psychonaut (talk) 07:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 11:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of copyrighted material by anon's. . Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 06:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. So far I do not see how indefinite semi-protection can be justified. If disruption continues after the protection has been expired please reapply.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:12, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Licorne continues to slow-motion edit war on this article. ANI report imposed a one-day semi-protection, but indefinite may be more appropriate since he just waits out semi-protections and then re-adds his original research. jps (talk) 21:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from similar IP addresses and newly created accounts. . KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:21, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 11:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Different IP address have been persistently editing (suspected vandalism) the article and replacing facts with untrue and uncited information. Marcnut1996 (talk) 08:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since this is first protection, let's start with this.. --Ekabhishektalk 11:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"'Semi-protection:"'Different IP address have been persistently editing (suspected vandalism) the article and replacing facts with untrue information. William Tölöberg (talk) 08:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 11:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – OTRS action has taken place, but various IP keep popping up and making questionable edits. IP user is suspected to be another user editing logged-out to avoid scrutiny, however this is unconfirmed. Requesting protection because as soon as we warn IP for editing in one area, they move on to another. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Second this. This is obviously the same person, but the IP shifts constantly, four times today alone. The IPs are in the range 82.132... (which resolves to Telefonica O2 UK). Voceditenore (talk) 16:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please also look at the talk page. Same IP hopper disrupting it. --NeilN talk to me 01:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 10:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent use of an airplay chart by IPs. Everytime I change to a sales chart, (also a more accurate chart), they consistently change it back to Poland. The discography page is supposed to be for sales charts. Semi-protection for a short while might do the trick to stop them changing it back. Bbbnbbbtalk 11:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 11:01, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Gparyani (talk) 02:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 05:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalisms by IPs, possible sock-puppetry. I.Bhardwaj (talk) 15:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temp protection, much vandalism from a myriad of sources. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 12:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It looks like there is some sockpuppetry going on here, page protection may put a stop to it. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 12:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC) [reply]
Semi-protected by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (3 months) tutterMouse (talk) 08:03, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 00:46, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 04:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: There seems to be a dispute between some editors on what the title of the page should be. Steel1943 (talk) 18:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Nothing to indicate we can't try communication first. Let me know if it continues. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Main article of Audie Murphy has history of IP vandalism related to his military service. This article is new and not discovered by IPs. This new article is scheduled to run as the lead DYK hook on the WP main page on June 20. Request semi-protection June 20 to expire June 23, protecting it through the weekend. — Maile (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. Pjposullivan (talk) 00:05, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Freshh! (talk) 23:41, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP's. Chander For You 03:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Some of what they are adding IS sourced, as such, this is a pure content dispute and WP:3RR applies. Try to use the talk page or DRN to build a consensus. Protecting the article would be prejudicing it against IPs, who appear to be editing in good faith, even if some mistakes are in there. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 21:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistant amends by PR agencies, and people associated with the subject in an attempt to turn article into a "puff pieces" and advertisements is prohibited. Article is currently semi-protected until 22nd, however this has not stopped a registered user, who descibes themselves on Twitter as the "Guerrilla online marketing arm of @worldwidepr" It appear there is a concerted effort to abuse wikipedias neutrality.

Declined It is already protected, and we can't extend preventatively. If the ongoing problem is with an autoconconfirmed editor, protection won't help anyway. You might try the talk page then WP:DRN to get a consensus on what is and isn't promotional, then WP:ANI if the editors are editing against policy and/or consensus, so they can be blocked. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 20:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from various IP's. In spotlight due to recent World Cup events. Fraggle81 (talk) 22:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BenYes? 20:50, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP has been on a campaign to add these irrelevant images to numerous articles for months now (ie [46], [47], [48]) . TDL (talk) 20:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs making trouble lately. George Ho (talk) 23:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Since this article is attached to an important and highly-visible template, it should be move-protected indefinitely (any proposals for moving this article should reach broad consensus and can be done by an administrator later). ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 10:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected — MusikAnimal talk 23:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 22:59, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 23:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

21 June 2014

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular and frequent introduction of factual errors (edits that are pure fantasy, such as claiming that the Albanian Air Force operate Saab JAS 39 Gripen...) by IPs and new user accounts. It calmed down for a while after a number of new user accounts had been blocked as socks of indef blocked user Denis Halili, but seems to be starting again, this time from IPs geolocating to the UK (possibly proxies). Thomas.W talk 15:46, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 16:33, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:MATRIALSCIENTIST02 keeps vandalizing this page. Constant vandalism over the past several days. . Backendgaming (talk) 04:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Gogo Dodo (talk · contribs). CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 12:02, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unregistered IP editing, into inappropriate the rules and not accurate information. Persistent IP vandalism – High-level of vandalism of no source provided. And I'm sure that as soon expires the temporary protection some not registered editors which use only IP addresses will continue to harm for this template. Hanibal911 (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:188.162.64.59 has been hitting the article pretty hard today--maybe 14 edits or so. User is trying to block Cyberbot II from applying a page protection request. Requesting 24-28 hour protection against IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:33, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. Range-blocked the rather persistent IP vandal. Favonian (talk) 10:02, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:05, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Series of IP socks from Singapore keeps changing content. Suspected sockpuppets

These include

. Backendgaming (talk) 01:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi-protection due to incessant changing of date/year of birth (see [49]) based on Find-a-Grave, which is not a reliable source, as his been explained to the IP editor (see [50]) as kindly and patiently as I can. He/she has reverted other editors as well (see [51]), who have told him/her that these edits appear to constitute vandalism. He/she cites this mindless mantra: "updated information for this article, listed as born in 1899 at findagrave.com, on her headstone., have also noted the date as December 31st", intentionally and arrogantly ignoring the advice of more seasoned editors, including but not limited to myself, also regarding the Sheila Florance article, to which the same editor insists on adding unsourced information. Quis separabit? 00:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by indefinitely blocked User:Danrolo using dynamic IPs. RJFF (talk) 20:54, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:09, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I wonder if PC is effective enough, as infrequently-edited Princess Leia is semi-protected. George Ho (talk) 20:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined PC is exactly effective if the article is edited infrequently. In this case, the vandalism come for a very long time and with a low intensity. There are also constructive IP edits. The alternative to PC would be indefinite semi-protection, and I just do not see anything in the article history justifying it.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-level of vandalism of no source provided edits concerning upcoming concert tour by singer Demi Lovato. livelikemusic my talk page! 16:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, looks like a content dispute to me, in addition, there was at least one constructive edit today from a different IP.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unregistered IP editing, into inappropriate and not accurate information. Very poor spelling also. Jake Smethurst (talk) 16:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is only one static IP, and they have not done anything blockable after the warning. Try talking to them first.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Backendgaming (talk) 01:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:220.255.1.27, Singapore based IP user got into a huge edit war with three different editors (User:Pinethicket, User:Hbent, and me) on the article Village since June 17th 2014. Please block this IP and a series of IPs vandalizing the article as it appears to be dynamic. Backendgaming (talk) 01:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC) There is also a lot of sock puppetry going on the Village article.[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets of User:220.255.1.27

Please block all these IP sockpuppets including User:220.255.1.27 vandalizing Village.

Already protected by administrator Bbb23. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:35, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi-protection due to incessant changing of date/year of birth (see [52]) based on Find-a-Grave, which is not a reliable source, as his been explained to the IP editor (see [53]) as kindly and patiently as I can. He/she has reverted other editors as well (see [54]), who have told him/her that these edits appear to constitute vandalism. He/she cites this mindless mantra: "updated information for this article, listed as born in 1899 at findagrave.com, on her headstone., have also noted the date as December 31st", intentionally and arrogantly ignoring the advice of more seasoned editors, including but not limited to myself, also regarding the Sheila Florance article, to which the same editor insists on adding unsourced information. Quis separabit? 00:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 23:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:29, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 23:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:24, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes privilege by anon IP editors and new users . STATic message me! 22:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Several days of edit warring between two registered editors. Thanks. 75.177.156.78 (talk) 21:54, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism: major BLP violation. Երևանցի talk 01:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: To enforce consensus of deletion discussion. STATic message me! 16:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:06, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Someone introducing factual errors and removing valid sources. The Banner talk 15:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, it looks more like a tag team now. The Banner talk 16:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:04, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 15:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:01, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Additions of unsourced or poorly sourced content by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 14:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 10:58, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. Arfæst Ealdwrítere (talk) 11:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping user keeps adding a partially-sourced paragraph about how Spain is Western Europe's last dictatorship. I have requested that any form of this that has sourceable quotes from significant people should go in the Abdication/Reactions section. The IP user has ignored this. AlexTiefling (talk) 10:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit warrior, blocked many times, returned under new IP. Binksternet (talk) 06:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit warrior, blocked many times, returned under new IP. Binksternet (talk) 06:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., please reapply if disruption continues.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs warring over genre. . Binksternet (talk) 05:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., do not see any need for indefinite semi-protection--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs warring over genre. Binksternet (talk) 05:05, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently vandalized by a new user and an IP. Gparyani (talk) 02:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., though I doubt it could help.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Waldorf education (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user continuing to post personal attacks. Binksternet (talk) 22:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Dennis Brown (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 month) 07:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 13:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only 110 transclusions. The protecting admin is inactive; their last edit was in September 2013. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected, reduced to semi-protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrade to temporary full protection. Persistent vandalism. Was semi-protected w/in last 24 hours, then obvious throwaway account User:TheMysticalGamer was quickly taken to 10 edits to get around semi-protection, and added another doctored picture of subject to the page, this time with "goatse" picture in the background.--Milowent • hasspoken 03:42, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term IP genre warring. Recurs on about a weekly basis. Requesting 1-2 month semi-protection to foster movement to talk page, training of genre warriors in WP:RS, and/or dying down of recurrence. Chubbles (talk) 02:45, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lord Roem.. tutterMouse (talk) 07:22, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Backendgaming (talk) 02:18, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lord Roem.. tutterMouse (talk) 07:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There has been conflicts between IP addresses and users. This will most likely continue since the World Cup is ongoing. GoPurple'nGold24 01:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakr\ talk / 00:56, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Singapore based IP keeps vandalizing this page. Filled with User talk:220.255.1.27‎ sockpuppet IPs. Backendgaming (talk) 01:38, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 02:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 23:09, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 23:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Rocky Marciano (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopping user promotes mywikibiz page. . Sjö (talk) 13:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @Sjö: I've performed a couple of anon only range blocks to stop the vandalism. Let me know if it keeps up. Mike V • Talk 23:47, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bob Baker (boxer) (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopping editor adds promotion for mywikibiz page. Sjö (talk) 13:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Same as above. Mike V • Talk 23:47, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Different IP address have been persistently editing (suspected vandalism) the article and replacing facts with untrue information. Marcnut1996 (talk) 06:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --slakr\ talk / 01:04, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 22:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --slakr\ talk / 00:55, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – disruptive editing after recently expired protection. 1966batfan (talk) 16:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. --slakr\ talk / 00:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new accounts vandalizing the article. Ishdarian 10:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --slakr\ talk / 00:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

22 June 2014

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by random IPs. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 18:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address keeps editing/vandalising. QuartzReload (talk) 16:44, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection or Indefinite pending changes: repeated serious violations of WP:BLP by multiple widely separated IPs. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 11:37, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Don't think PC is a good option for OSable problems. --j⚛e deckertalk 21:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 20:27, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:43, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP's and other users. Semi-protection was lifted not too long ago but vandalism returned.Wackyike (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 500 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --j⚛e deckertalk 21:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes privilege by anon IP editors on a BLP. STATic message me! 18:55, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper repeatedly adding unsourced/copyrighted material to article (see page history). On 21 May 2014 the article was semi-protected for a month, but the IP-hopper resumed his activities immediately after the page protection expired yesterday. Thomas.W talk 06:44, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:13, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing revision war due to a recent logo change (some people don't like the new logo and keep putting the old logo back). Mister Tog (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 15:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple anon IP editors repeatedly adding the same promotional content about a person with questionable notability. • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Let's see if that's enough time to discourage them. If not, drop a note on my talk page. Deor (talk) 13:17, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment): Pending changes would achieve the same goals without the restrictions associated with semi-protection. Arfæst Ealdwrítere (talk) 18:49, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not necessarily; not all reviewers would recognize the socks. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:48, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
They would if we placed a notice on the respective page. Arfæst Ealdwrítere (talk) 23:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Arfæst Ealdwrítere: In this case pending changes would not have been appropriate as the only edits are socks. Also as Jackmcbarn said reviewers may not recognise the socks and there isn't really a good place which would be seen to place a notice. In any case I've deleted the page per WP:CSD#G5 and put an autoconfirmed salt on it.

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violation by IP. 2 weeks should do it.Niteshift36 (talk) 17:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment): Pending changes would achieve the same goals without the restrictions associated with semi-protection. Arfæst Ealdwrítere (talk) 18:45, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:02, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting 4 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. Block evasion: article creator is Tristan.andrade.136 Article is low profile, user is a weekend editor. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment): I suggest that it is put under pending changes rather than semi-protected since it is low profile. Arfæst Ealdwrítere (talk) 15:48, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion: User:Tristan.andrade.136 (ANI discussion). User has returned numerous times since block as Hazmat.136, Terry the Turtle, and a host of IPs. User still doesn't accept that they are blocked from editing. My attempts to revert per WP:RBI have not dissuaded user from editing. User tends to edit on the weekends beginning Friday evenings, so I am requesting 4 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users with the hope that the user will eventually give up. Thanks, . Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:01, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment): Pending changes would achieve the same goals without the restrictions associated with semi-protection. Arfæst Ealdwrítere (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:59, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 03:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected until I have evolved into a superior being. After I have evolved into a superior being the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry of NYCSlover (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NYCSlover), with this article one of its main targets. The Banner talk 22:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. They haven't been protected before so indef isn't really appropriate and I'd rather give the sockpuppeteer nothing to edit. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:50, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry of NYCSlover (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NYCSlover), with this article one of its main targets. The Banner talk 22:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. They haven't been protected before so indef isn't really appropriate and I'd rather give the sockpuppeteer nothing to edit. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:51, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry of NYCSlover (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NYCSlover), with this article one of its main targets. The Banner talk 22:00, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. They haven't been protected before so indef isn't really appropriate and I'd rather give the sockpuppeteer nothing to edit. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:51, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: To protect the consensus of the AfD which resulted in a redirect. STATic message me! 20:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:55, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dwpaul Talk 03:33, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:45, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Keeps getting vandalised by IP address. QuartzReload (talk) 23:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Swatjester. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 03:04, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Persistent vandalism from former employees. User:Cokes2002 (talk) 22:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article's been around since 2007, bit late for creation protection. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the page was Semi Protected and then when released from protection immediately vandalized. Can you please protect it again and, if possible, protect it indefinitely? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cokes2002 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment): This page seems to be subject to either vandalism / sockpuppetry / or an edit war (or possibly all three). I also notice that the account of Cokes2002 is very new ( made specifically for this discussion), which is rather suspicious. Arfæst Ealdwrítere (talk) 18:58, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

23 June 2014

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 18:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: It's gotten lots of recent edits, and although it's semiprotected, all of them have been vandalism or vandalism-reversion. Only one good edit in the last six months, aside from vandalism reversion, was made by a non-administrator. This is a help page that doesn't often need to be edited, anyway. 149.160.173.187 (talk) 14:09, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is not a template, but it is highly, highly visible, much akin to the highly-visible templates TP was created to address, so let's give this, rather than FP, a shot. We'll probably need to extend this when it expires, but expiration will give us a chance to review whether this force-fitting of TP will be considered a sensible idea. --j⚛e deckertalk 21:29, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors and new users to a BLP. STATic message me! 06:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 200 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - The history leaves little hope for a reduction in baseline vandalism soon. --j⚛e deckertalk 21:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — LeoFrank  Talk 15:29, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Favonian (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (3 months) tutterMouse (talk) 19:00, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address constantly vandalising. QuartzReload (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Disruptive IP blocked. Acroterion (talk) 02:08, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Somebody or several IP are targeting dog weight, sometimes just messing around, sometimes changing them to something else. So many times that it is irritating by now. One has to check those changes all the time... We are not many working with dog articles, if we are both missig, the article suddenly say that Rottweilers are 100 kg. Hafspajen (talk) 16:46, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Got protected, per talk page discussion. Hafspajen (talk) 15:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Drmies (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (6 months) tutterMouse (talk) 19:02, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request removal of pending changes: Article hasn't been subject to any vandalism since January and it's somewhat annoying having to approve valid IP edits. Protecting admin (Mark Arsten) is currently inactive. DH85868993 (talk) 14:04, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deor (talk) 14:32, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by anon IP editors and new users. SigKauffman (talk) 00:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Mattythewhite. Mike V • Talk 02:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute, maybe?. George Ho (talk) 06:43, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only a few edits per day, I don't see why you are asking for protection. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 01:30, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced changes. —Lightsout (talk) 22:30, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 01:32, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. VQuakr (talk) 02:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 02:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For 2 days or so (till the heat is over). ···Vanischenu (mc/talk) 02:02, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 02:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 22:55, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 01:51, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

24 June 2014

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, BLP violation. Երևանցի talk 16:58, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of sourced content by IPs. Randykitty (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think someone is using different computers to change the genre of this song. It's happened several times in the last few days, each time with a different IP address, making the same edit. It's surely the same person. I've given warnings but I can't keep on giving level one warnings if the IP addresses keep changing, it won't solve the problem. Suggest temporary protection to see if it stops.  — ₳aron 14:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 20:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and bad edits by unregistered IPs after reported transfer. Bad edits include adding new "Manchester United" section and edited club information in infobox. Vandalism include random clubs in infobox and various bad faith edits. Bryan (talk) 09:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Gossip protection season has begun. GedUK  11:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 09:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.. GedUK  11:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: There is a draft article in WP:AFC at Draft:Quantium Solutions that is almost ready for acceptance (though your opinion may differ), and I wish to move it to this article name shortly, please. If your opinion differs I invite you to decline the submission giving reasons. What you do with page protection will not then matter, certainly for a while. Fiddle Faddle 07:02, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected - Timtrent, please consult with the protecting administrator: RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Vinícius94 (talk) 06:51, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by random IP. I warned it a number of times but it won't stop. Please protect.Backendgaming (talk) 03:53, 23 June 2014 (UTC). Backendgaming (talk) 03:53, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. - In the future Backendgaming, please report specific users to WP:AIV. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs want to add "-TV" to KFXA, when the station's call sign is just KFXA. . CorkythehornetfanTalk 00:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

205.185.155.17 is the main IP,, who's has been warned multiple times by different users, including myself. But there are other IPs as well. CorkythehornetfanTalk 00:47, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Might be worth it to report those two to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/69.66.187.17, where the case of these annoying reversions has been consolidated to in the past. Looks like this dial-up sock of 66.99 was finally able to get in some new numbers to continue. Nate • (chatter) 01:38, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And I have done so; hopefully a rangeblock of the dial-up range might be able to stop this without any semi-protection. Nate • (chatter) 01:50, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, thanks! I never even gave it a thought to look if they were sock puppets. Hopefully it will stop it. CorkythehornetfanTalk 01:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rangeblocked so in essence User(s) blocked.. tutterMouse (talk) 06:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I guess a few days semi-protection will be enough to deter an IP-hopping editor from introducing deliberate mistakes. . The Banner talk 11:02, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 05:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Several IPs from Monaco, where the World Music Awards are based, removing sourced information about the awards not airing on NBC and the loss of the ceremony's host due to a payment dispute. WP:COI highly suspected. Nate • (chatter) 01:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 05:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It is being persistently vandalised by some users + IP's. QuartzReload (talk) 21:59, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't think there is enough vandalism to warrant protection. Plus, the offending accounts have been blocked. Mike V • Talk 05:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 19:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Recent disruption appears to becoming from a single IP. — MusikAnimal talk 04:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP hopping vandalism.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Recent disruption appears to be coming from a single IP, beyond that not enough disruption to warrant protection. — MusikAnimal talk 04:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new user accounts with obvious COI repeatedly adding promotional material to article, material that is copied verbatim from Eagle Broadcasting's web site. Thomas.W talk 03:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Users have also been blocked. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts by anon users to add defamatory information. Topics are already covered in article and such additional edits consist of contributing undue weight to the defamatory topic. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 01:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for the heads up I.am.a.qwerty... helped me catch a big BLP violation at Sholom Lipskar as well. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Pending edit/revert war - attempting to engage user in discussion to come to a consensus so as to prevent this. GrahamNoyes (talk) 13:48, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 04:14, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism, disruptive editing and unsourced additions/changes by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 16:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism, specifically from dynamic IP User:71.172.185.55 (aka blocked user:Pierceybrian22, also the reason why Now That's What I Call Music! discography has also been protected. -- StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 06:28, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Pattern of similar edits by several single article/single-purpose accounts, per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HorseMcDonald. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: I'm honestly not sure whether this page would do better with semi-protection than with pending changes but in the interest of using the lowest possible level of protection first then escalating if/as needed I am requesting this.

This page is constantly hit with IP edits adding unsourced information to a list of uses that has to be constantly culled by myself and other editors who watch or notice the page. This is despite adding an HTML note to the page to note that only sourced information should be added and unsourced information would be removed per policy. Cat-fivetc ---- 04:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected tutterMouse (talk) 06:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Used by Template:Rfd and Template:Rfd/core which are template-protected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done (For the bot.) Mike V • Talk 05:11, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uncletomwood (talk) 16:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 05:20, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 pro-Russian conflict in Ukraine and 2014 Northern Iraq offensive

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism – In the case of the Ukraine conflict, an IP editor has been inserting unsourced figures on servicemen fatalities. When editors attempt to revert his edit he reinserts his unsourced numbers and insults fellow editors in the edit summary while doing so. In the case of the Iraq offensive article, the same editor pushes calling an event a claim, implying its unverified, even though it was confirmed by multiple independent sources. And same situation further as with the Ukraine article, editors revert him, he reverts back and insults them. I am arguing for a temporary protection of the articles at this time, but if he continues with the disruptive edits after the protection ends I will ask for a longer protection. EkoGraf (talk) 13:49, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Block on single IP is already in place. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

temporary semi protection a recent release that is the target of flame boys -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 10:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 05:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

full-portection: to block editing without permission

Declined, See the page protection policy. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Give pending changes protection, as the page is infrequently edited and it would be a better fit for the article. Novato 123chess456 (talk) 14:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Please talk to the protecting admin first as noted above. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 01:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations – Someone removed confirmation about his sexuality. Fortunately, I seem to recover the content. George Ho (talk) 22:35, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - One instance of vandalism, no sign that the problem will repeat. Please let us know if the issue recurs. --j⚛e deckertalk 21:12, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP users are removing referenced texts, placing their ones with clear violation of POV. Last time when i revert it, he is accused me of being a communist propagator. This is a clear personal attack indeed by the way.elmasmelih (used to be KazekageTR) 14:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Concerned edit summaries redacted per WP:RD3. — MusikAnimal talk 04:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Per reasons discussed on Talk page of Pending not being appropriate due to edit volume. Technophant (talk) 10:23, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for the remaining duration of pre-existing pending changes protection, expiring 13 December 2014. — MusikAnimal talk 04:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – An anon seems to have taken offence at a statement, which is both referenced and reasonable. The anon is IP hopping so locking to new editors may be required. I would prefer to find another solution since the subject is involved in the World Cup and anons may provide some useful edits, but the anon from Elmhurst, Illinois doesn't seem to want to be constructive. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 13:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 01:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 13:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 01:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

long term semi protection an article under the arbcom R&I sanctions - no constructive edits from IPs, in like ever.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:19, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I don't feel extended protection necessary at this time. If there are further issues, feel free to page me on my talkpage, as this is an R&I area. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued edit warring by unsourced POV-pushing IP-hopper. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dougweller.. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trolls adding a fictional character to the list. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 17:51, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalised with constant incorrect facts being added, such as playing for arsenal and having information changed. QuartzReload (talk) 22:30, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Has been re-vandalised by a new account. QuartzReload (talk) 19:08, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 21:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

25 June 2014

Pending changes protection level 1: Not too frequent but persistent IP vandalism. As this page is very notable (see the page view statistics), a pending changes protection should work well.Forbidden User (talk) 17:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't think there has been enough vandalism since unprotection to reinstate it. Mike V • Talk 17:25, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced and incorrect additions. Akib.H (talk) 15:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 17:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 15:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. One editor using a series of IPs geolocating to Palermo, Italy persists in changing the lead actor's name. It appears the IP confuses Piper Perabo with Emily Blunt. Constantly changing IP makes communication impossible. New season began last night, and IP user is repeatedly changing the lead's name. One IP was blocked, but the user is now on another, so block had no effect. --Drmargi (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: semi'd by an admin as I was posting this. Thank you!

Already protected. (For the bot) Mike V • Talk 17:18, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lugia2453 (talk) 16:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by MusikAnimal. Mike V • Talk 17:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Several changes to the page by vandals resulted in a bunch of false information on the article, including sexual stuff. It's most likely that vandals are going to that page since the main article is perma-protected. URDNEXT (talk) 12:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 17:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection: Persistent vandalism. Anonymous editors who used ID Rotcerroc1, IP numbers 184.175.45.58 and 209.162.255.139 have been vandalizing the page since June 14th changing the name of Garena's founder and CEO. As the official Garena wiki page manager, I hereby request that you could please full-protect both the English and Chinese wikipages of Garena and change the Founder and CEO back to Forrest Li on the English page and 創辦人 to Forrest Li on the Chinese page. Thank you. Flqhyw (talk) 09:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Hi @Flqhyw: please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Contact us - Subjects, specifically the email address on that page so we can verify your identity. I've reverted the changes, however full protection isn't justified by your protection policy. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP hopper. Dwpaul Talk 12:26, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and bad edits by unregistered IPs. If you dont put protection of this template then not registered editors continue to harm. Hanibal911 (talk) 18:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looking at Template:Iraqi insurgency detailed map which is the article it's been moved to, I can't see enough por IP edits that warrant protection. There seem to be many IP edits that are fine. GedUK  11:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism after recent Suarez incident. MaxBrowne (talk) 12:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again, these IPs are continued to remove (continuing same action) YouTube Spotlight's entry. SMB99thx XD 10:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As I mentioned on the talk page, this article's not at all what you'd expect it to be from it's title. GedUK  11:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent removal of referenced content without proper reasoning, addition of non-referenced POV , and legal threats through various IPs 101.172.255.231, 101.173.255.228, 121.220.2.85, 203.16.24.235. ELEKHHT 10:05, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Mdann52talk to me! 08:53, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject was on a podcast minutes ago taking about vandalizing Wikipedia and his Wikipedia page. [55] The page is overflowing with low quality edits. Antrocent (♫♬) 08:27, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:01, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ruddah (talk) 08:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. MJ94 (talk) 05:27, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's only one editor so blocking would be preferred. I've given them a warning for now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Show has recently encouraged vandalism to the article. Should be protected as a precaution. JDDJS (talk) 04:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:06, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes is clearly not cutting it. We have an AC user accepting what is clearly a wrong edit, etc. Furthermore, there is nothing to edit on the page most of the time. Hoops gza (talk) 02:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please ask the admin who pending changes protected the page, also the reviewer who accepted that incorrect edit has been blocked as a compromised account. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:16, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked per the SPI submitted, and I've watchlisted the page so I can block on sight in the future. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to request that some action can be taken for vandalism done on the article List of Bonkers episodes and occasionally the main article associated with it. An Anonymous editor who hopped from IP numbers 86.132.21.30, 86.155.243.100, 86.132.23.237, 86.132.16.123 has been vandalising the page since May 30th adding names and bits from unrelated shows. If possible could you semi-protect the page? Thank you. Deltasim (talk) 06:27, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Bonkers (TV series) pending changes protected for three months. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This article MUST remain protected till the plane is found. Third request, please put. We do not want unsourced material in here. Spare a thought for the families of those victims. If they are reading this, and any wrong info, we're dead. I beg you. PLEASE protect this page. Persistent vandalism might occur quite frequently too. Please. Nahnah4 | Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! | No Editcountitis! 03:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please ask the protecting admin to extend the protection before coming here. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The page was protected because of edit-warring with BDB corporate accounts and socks. But all have been indefintely blocked and site banned. I think that the page can be safely unprotected, and that doing so would allow improvement of the article and fixing of article issues. However, I suggest that semiprotection continue to prevent unconstructive edits by SPAs, including those antagonistic toward the company. Coretheapple (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, fully protected. And p.s., I've alerted the protecting administrator. Coretheapple (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined You need to ask the protecting admin before coming here. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:48, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page had a 1 week protection from March 26 to April 2 due to vandalism, and protected for 1 month from May 7 to June 7 for vandalism. Since June 7, the majority of edits have been either vandalism or reverting of vandalism. For some reason, this page attracts a lot of anti-gay vandalism, such as this one. I request page protection that lasts longer than 1 month. Thank you. Barryjjoyce (talk) 01:19, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:19, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent insertion of copyright violations by multiple IP addresses. Page has already been semi-protected three times (the latest for three months), but the copyright violations were once again re-added soon after protection expired. Dendrite1 (talk) 23:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:23, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive reverts by IP users to remove properly sourced text. -YMB29 (talk) 22:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One of the IP users followed me to other articles and reverted my edits there.[56] -YMB29 (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from alleged sockpuppets. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 05:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If we can get admin attention for this as soon as possible, there is much socking and vandalism going on here and it is starting to spread to other pages. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 05:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and other WP:Disruptive edits; this article keeps getting semi-protected because of those issues. Flyer22 (talk) 03:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Much-needed protection from disruptive edits and additions of fictitious content. – Recollected • 03:24, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:10, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced/poorly sourced additions. Snuggums (talk • contributions) 03:19, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Either film director Albert Pyun himself or his fans had been vandalizing this and other related articles for years. Latest IP even "signed" with "WE ARE THE ALBERT PYUN ARMY!" HkCaGu (talk) 03:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock puppetry by IPs. I.Bhardwaj (talk) 21:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war ongoing over a long period. I've reverted twice to remove unsourced blp info such as DOB and to readd sourced content removal that had been removed with a vague biased reason. either way probably the only way to stop the dispute without handing out blocks. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 21:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit wars

Temporary semi-protection: There is a user generating edit wars; and this was blocked by user do edit wars, and returned, but this time using different accounts to enforce editing. Jorge Horan (talk) 13:52, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lord Roem.: fully protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boxing Article Talk pagess

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopping user keeps inserting promotional material on a book and links to his webpage into these talk pages. No point in blocking IPs as they change constantly. Meters (talk) 21:20, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Fatidiot1234 (talk) 20:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive IP edits, showing no interest in discussion. illythr (talk) 17:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IP users are also making disruptive reverts to the related article Battle of Tali-Ihantala. It looks like the same people are doing this to both articles (well at least one of the IPs is the same). -YMB29 (talk) 18:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Roem, see my comment above and the reverts by an IP user in both articles in the last 15 minutes[57][58]. -YMB29 (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This looks like a content dispute. I recall the issue of the War's result being hotly contested (I mediated something related to it). If it's being protected, it's going to be full-protected, considering proscribing IPs may functionally remove one side of the debate. --Lord Roem ~ (talk) 21:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lord Roem, no you mediated the dispute about original research in this article and the result of the Vyborg-Petrozavodsk Offensive, see here[59].
There was no discussion initiated by the IP users on the talk page to change a result that has been there for a long time.
The fact that it is a different IP user making a revert each time should tell you something. -YMB29 (talk) 22:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, look at this edit summary: Go and invade Ukraine instead you Russian Pig! Nuff Nuff![60] -YMB29 (talk) 23:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The point of this request *was* to force the IPs to actually use the talk page, as they weren't particularly predisposed to discussion otherwise, in the hope that they have better arguments than this (the last edit to the talk page is by me more than a month ago). Locking the article in the version they were pushing certainly won't inspire them to suddenly stop ignoring the discussion. --illythr (talk) 00:06, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

26 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing edit war since 24 May,[61] by anonymous editor who has changed IP several times. The editor's controversial changes have been reverted by numerous editors on numerous occasions. This article and List of countries by population (United Nations) were previously protected to stop the edit war but the edit-war started again almost as soon as the previous protection expired.. AussieLegend (✉) 02:42, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:29, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: an anonymous editor has been ceaselessly vandalizing this article for the last half year, switching between I.P. addresses that have been immediately blocked. Seeing as there is no end in sight for this kind of behavior, it is only necessary that we cut off his mischief at the root. DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 01:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see where we stand after that, perhaps the concerned vandals will lose interest. — MusikAnimal talk 21:25, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: From 2008 I have a persistent harrasment from a dynamic IP that blames over my father. This cyberbullying has no limits. Taichi (talk) 00:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The user page has been Semi-protected indefinitely.
I've Semi-protected the talk page for 3 years. Mike V • Talk 18:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP editor insists upon placing content (which is in the article) in the lead section based upon a personal opinion of its importance. Previous short terms of semi-protection have not deterred this activity FriendlyFred (talk) 18:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or pending changes: IP vandal keeps adding nonsense.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:55, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  11:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Some good, some bad, but this needs protection. George Ho (talk) 22:00, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  11:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Last edit is last month, May. But I don't see a good edit by non-autoconfirmed user. George Ho (talk) 22:00, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  11:38, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: I don't see a good edits by IPs and unconfirmed editors lately. Many have been reverted, including good-faith edits. George Ho (talk) 21:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The most recent set of IP edits look fine to me. GedUK  11:34, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – History of ongoing IP vandalism, adding jokes and misinformation about a British children's TV presenter. Ignoring the spate of edits when Nutkins died in 2012, all but one of the hundreds of IP edits over the past five years have been immediately reverted. McGeddon (talk) 06:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:45, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User Recollected has removed content from the article that was referenced and is important to the article and I feel that it will continue to be done, so I'm requesting page protection. Kaos28 Talk 18:44, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Start the discussion on the talk page before asking for protection. So far, everything is going as it's supposed to. Don't revert it again or itl'll turn into an edit war. GedUK  11:22, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There are a lot of good faith edits and vandalisms in May and June 2014. I kinda makes the job more easier if it's protected for only a few days. FairyTailRocks 14:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, The incidences of good faith but reverted edits are qute low, so I'm loathe to protect to keep out good faith on this scale. The incidences of vandalism are also pretty infrequent ath this point too. GedUK  11:17, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has recently signed a contract with Paykan FC, a reference has been added for this. There does not seem to be any evidence that this transfer is delayed until any specific date as reverters are claiming. Fans of his former club seem to be reverting the page to his former club and removing the reference to his signing for Paykan FC which includes a photo of him with the Paykan chairman and has been reported through various outlets, including the one referenced, as well as here: http://www.tasnimnews.com/English/Home/Single/412780

and here: http://sport360.com/article/football/22602/jlloyd-samuel-leaves-esteghlal-after-5-month-pay-dispute

Additionally, Samuel has also confirmed that he has ended his Esteghlal contract after 2.5 years on his Facebook page. Mountaincirque 13:16, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, it looks like the user stopped reverting. If disruption reappears, please reapply.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An edit war that has been going on for a couple of weeks without any talk page discussion. I suggest restoring the status quo ante version around here: [62] and fully protecting the article to encourage discussion. . - MrX 18:25, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't want to roll back to another version, because that implies that I'm taking sides, which I can't do. You've started the conversation on the talk page, but you might also find it helpful to ask for opinions from a relevant wikiproject (vexilogy or Japan perhaps) especially if the other side doesn't engage. If they don't engage and you don't get any other opinions, then we can semi protect this as clearly your view would then represent consensus. GedUK  11:29, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of table content that is too soon to include for the page. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant edit/genre warring in infobox. IPadPerson (talk) 17:27, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Both users involved have been warned. Continued edit warring may lead to blocks instead. Mike V • Talk 18:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

27 June 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: continued vandalism by IPs and new accounts, including BLP issues of figures associated with the organisation. Has had brief semi-protection twice before, both times ending with vandalism almost as soon as being unprotected again. '''tAD''' (talk) 16:13, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:58, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various IP's over a long period. Fraggle81 (talk) 16:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Rise in IP POV drive-by editing [63] [64] [65] [66] of a controversial topic, with no accountability for questionable POV edits and pejorative comments. IZAK (talk) 12:16, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There hasn't been much disruption to the actual article. Any behavioural issues that have cropped up on the talk page are best addressed elsewhere, maybe WP:ANI or WP:AE. Also, saying "An article written by Shmuel Schnitzer ... portrays how much the secular media in Israel is guilty of Anti-Orthodox bias" is stating an opinion about Schnitzer's article in Wikipedia's voice, which we shouldn't really be doing. I can't really fault the IP for removing that. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-change protection: Persistent vandalism. Many thanks for having restored and protected the English Wiki page. However, no action seems to have been taken on the Chinese wiki page of Garena which has been vandalized by the same IP 209.162.255.139 that vandalized the English page. Could the administrator please undo the change by this IP and impose the same level of protection on the Chinese page as has been imposed on the English version? Thank you.Flqhyw (talk) 10:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

semi protection long time target of political and BLP screeds. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of false chart positions, mostly by IPs. Littlecarmen (talk) 11:46, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:14, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection:

IP address constantly removing operating systems that "are not encyclopedic" despite notability already established with Wikipedia. In Correct (talk) 03:27, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a content dispute, and should be settled by discussion on the talk page. If the IP doesn't join in the discussion after, say, a week, feel free to request protection again or to report them to WP:ANEW. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:52, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow moving editwar between IP-mover and others. The Banner talk 23:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @The Banner: This looks more like a content dispute than vandalism to me. The legal proceedings have not finished yet, so mentioning them may be in violation of WP:BLPCRIME (although the reference is quite oblique). Also, the lawsuit concerns the former owners after they sold the business, so the IP has a point when they claim it isn't relevant. I'd suggest removing the passage in question for now and waiting for legal proceedings to finish. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:30, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of non-notable entries possibly for the purpose of promotion. SMS Talk 23:06, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Smsarmad: that won't work, as the user adding the entries is autoconfirmed. You'll have to raise this on the talk page and try to find a consensus. If they keep edit-warring without discussion, you can report them to WP:ANEW. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:14, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – To prevent the AfD from being short circuited and to allow it to have a relevant discussion, not one that happened 7 years ago (see the talk page). Launchballer 21:51, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There is an issue regarding the addition of sourced plus unsourced material in the article and also due to COI, also making personal attacks on article's talk page. Articles needs to be temporary protected . A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 08:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 06:47, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The IP is in the right here. Reporting his death when sources only say he is missing is a WP:BLP violation, especially when the sources themselves are speculating that the YouTube video may have been a publicity stunt. I can unprotect the page when we have confirmed reports from reliable sources. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Continual vandalism, previously semi'd. czar ♔ 02:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

done Everyking (talk) 02:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected by Everyking (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 05:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:11, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page requires protection from IP's and potential autoconfirmed editors, over edits that violate WP:YEAR, WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:NOTNEWS, concerning the exit of Shephard and potential exit of McCarthy. livelikemusic my talk page! 04:31, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We usually only protect indefinitely when temporary protections have been tried and have failed. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection This page has recently seen an influx in vandalism, from people randomly blanking out images, to people incessantly adding false information. In the last month or so, it's been especially bad. I'm requesting temporary semi-protection, as I think that would discourage most of the edits, which are coming from anonymous IPs. Thanks!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:14, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also semi-protected the page for a week. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:57, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Perennial vandalism going back months. High visibility target like Horse, Jupiter, etc. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 03:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. I've also semi-protected the page for a week. Hopefully pending changes will be enough to stem the vandalism; if not, feel free to make another request here. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Edit war involving at least some IP based editors. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:27, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Stuartyeates: It's debatable whether the edits are BLP violations, as some other editors have commented on the talk page. I considered full protection, but instead I've semi-protected and given Ejoe2 (talk · contribs) a final warning. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:49, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of unsourced speculation by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 01:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:32, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Article was previously semi-protected for a period of 3 days and vandalism continued after this expired. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 22:38, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've protected until the end of the world cup - things might die down after that. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:09, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing content removal by IPs for no apparent reason. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:04, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – unexplained/unwarranted blanking and POV editing. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:15, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not actually vandalism, but the disruption definitely warrants protection. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:57, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 18:51, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:46, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and unsourced additions by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 18:13, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tamagotchi: Happiest Story in the Universe! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock operator Fidelis ofoajoku (aka Fidel ofoajoku, aka 188.29.165.3) continues to disrupt this article by introducing false countries of origin. Per suggestion by DoRD at Ponyo's talk page, the mobile IP range is too big to block effectively, the only reasonable recourse is page protection for the affected pages. User has been at this since about June 10, 2014. Should we start with a 2 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users? Thanks, . Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting protection for 2 weeks. Vandalism occurs every 2-3 days from multiple IPs. GoneIn60 (talk) 16:45, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @GoneIn60: Originally I wasn't sure which version was correct, but after some searching I found a citation for the disputed content (the top speed) mentioned in this source from the article. It will help prevent people from changing the statistics if the source appears right next to them. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:34, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection: Persistent vandalism - Following my previous request for full protection of Garena page, I have authenticated my ID as the company's wiki page manager through email as instructed by Wiki administrator. Shortly after the Wiki administrator restored the company's Wiki page in connection with my previous request for full protection, the page has been vandalized again. Could the administrator please again undo the changes to the name of Garena's founder (or 创办人 on the Chinese page) by anonymous editors using ID Rotcerroc1 or IP 184.175.45.58, 209.162.255.139 and 218.161.51.45 on Garena's English and Chinese Wiki pages and fully protect the two pages to stop the edit war that has been ongoing for two weeks. Thank you. Flqhyw (talk) 06:03, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Biography article. Subject died almost two months ago, and there has been a steady spate of blanking and POV pushing by both supporters and detractors since then. Waiting until the post-mortem arguing over the subject's legacy dies down might be prudent. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:11, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: persistent IP vandalism. including adding shockingly false, damaging, defamatory statements and removing sourced positive achievements. Clearly intending to defame, harass, and vandalize. 173.56.18.121 (talk) 22:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. We only use indefinite full protection in the most extreme of cases, but there has certainly been enough disruption at the article that pending changes is warranted. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent IP vandalism. These two not registered editors 92.128.32.207 83.202.51.170 engaged in vandalism and their actions are harmful for this article. Hanibal911 (talk) 19:45, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:54, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wars editions with different Ips

Temporary semi-protection:Hi, I request that you 3 pages are protected until it is resolved, the matter. I removed sections because you have no references and is irrelevant, a long list of names without much information on my highlights of issues I have explained. Now there have been different ips reverting my edits. Ask in IRC if you could remove sections and they said yes, because they were not relevant. GeorgeMilan TALK2ME 20:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some of them were protected yesterday, and so the expiry times aren't all the same. Please make a new request if the disruption continues after the protection expires. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:51, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP addresses. Darylgolden(talk) 02:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Mike V (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 06:18, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from the same IP vandal. URDNEXT (talk) 23:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined If it's only one IP, please report it to AIV instead. I've left a warning on their talk page for now. Mike V • Talk 01:43, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ···Vanischenu (mc/talk) 15:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Lord Roem (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (3 days) tutterMouse (talk) 06:16, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – A bunch of vandalism and anti-vandalism from IPs. I dream of horses (T) @ 00:23, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 00:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2014 pro-Russian conflict in Ukraine (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Pursuant to this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/L'Aquotique, I'd request that this talk page be semi-protected. We've had a constant influx of sockpuppets, making an RM on the talk page there quite difficult. RGloucester — ☎ 19:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 00:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Another of Star Wars topics needing protection. George Ho (talk) 22:01, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 21:15, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent IP vandalism. elmasmelih (used to be KazekageTR) 21:15, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A single IP caused disruption over three months ago, nothing since then. — MusikAnimal talk 21:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 NHL Entry Draft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: Upcoming event that will have information changing very quickly. Semi-protection until June 30th, 2014 would be more than enough. Deadman137 (talk) 19:26, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. — MusikAnimal talk 21:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. For about two weeks, every edit by an IP user has been reverted.  Unician ∇  07:34, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User talk:2602:306:CE9A:860:916F:3A3C:FC62:4D19 keeps vandalizing this article. Please protect. . Backendgaming (talk) 06:05, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mike V • Talk 18:01, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite creation-protection: Once this is deleted once again, creation protection would be nice so it is not recreated a third time :-) . ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 05:41, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The page is still live as a redirect so create protection wouldn't help right now. Mike V • Talk 18:00, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

28 June 2014

Semi-protection: Repeated insertion of unsourced fringe pseudoscience by IP/account hopper. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Dougweller (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (3 days) tutterMouse (talk) 19:07, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Freshh! (talk) 19:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Page has not been tagged with protection icon :p. Retartist (talk) 04:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this an edit request? tutterMouse (talk) 07:20, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Tag added. Mike V • Talk 17:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Have an edit war going on over a few days. Lets lock-up the article thus getting the editors involved to the talk page. . Moxy (talk) 21:33, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Since it's only between two editors, I think blocks would be better than protecting the page. I've issued a warning to both users. Mike V • Talk 01:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
One can assume that the page is now on your watchlist MIKE? -- Moxy (talk) 03:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/Wikipedia: Aim for Featured Article (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has become a playground for spammers and vandals.

Apparently the template that I restored has also been vandalized. I can't find where the text is stored, and I'd appreciate if someone more experienced with templates could take a look. Sjö (talk) 18:58, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected I could not figure out what to do with the template, please ask at the technical village pump.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent partisan editing by anon ips and a single purpose account. Possible sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Page was a previous haunt for User:Muktar allebbey socks. Middayexpress (talk) 15:13, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continues after recent release of protection. Freshh! (talk) 01:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 01:42, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continues after recent release of protection. Freshh! (talk) 01:05, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 01:42, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Due to the CNBC outing incident, I request that the current pending changes protection be upgraded to semi-protection. There's some edit warring going on right now over whether a certain offhand comment about his sexuality should be included. ONR (talk) 00:37, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a week by DMacks. Mike V • Talk 05:15, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Faizan 18:18, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Infrequent disruptive activity. Last all-out edit war was in February. — MusikAnimal talk 20:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is currently on Today's Featured Article and disruptive IP edits. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:08, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's been a long standing debate, but in my opinion it should be only in severe cases that TFA is protected. Here I see but a few instances of vandalism that were reverted within the same minute. — MusikAnimal talk 18:04, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Common target for TekkenJinKazama socks. Ravensfire (talk) 14:13, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not sure how much good semi-protection will do. Both of the recent socks were already autoconfirmed. If the disruption from this user and their socks is severe enough there are other routes toward dealing with it, such as edit filters. — MusikAnimal talk 17:46, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

29 June 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users continue to vandalize personal life. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:48, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 18:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Gautam and Gautam Group (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection. -- dsprc [talk] 12:35, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 18:32, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing repeated vandalism by unregistered users. They are now attacking talk pages of those who revert their edits and do blank edits to prevent reverts. Ignored repeated warnings and has been continuing for a month. - Drywater2k (talk) 00:33, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kuru (talk) 13:21, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism the unregistered users ongoing unconstructive/unsourced edits and provoking of war the editors.83.248.36.25186.26.230.122 Hanibal911 (talk) 16:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 18:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Subject was erroneously reported to have died by media outlets; now have retracted the claim (though he is quite ill). Users are adding death date based on earlier false reports. Dwpaul Talk 05:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit rate is too high for pending changes and it won't stop the edits so I've done with semi instead. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:38, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes - repeated violations of WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE, and edit-warring, by multiple different editors, including both unregistered editors and autoconfirmed editors. Suggest two months. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:36, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In response to the request at WP:ANEW, we'll see how that works first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism – An IP editor has been inserting unsourced figures on servicemen fatalities. When editors attempt to revert his edit he reinserts his unsourced numbers and insults fellow editors in the edit summary while doing so. His been doing this for the last week or so. Some administrators tried to block him due to his hostile behavior, but he is evading his blocks due to his IP address changing every morning. I am arguing for a temporary protection of the article at this time, but if he continues with the disruptive edits after the protection ends I will ask for a longer protection. EkoGraf (talk) 15:30, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection was recently made for this page, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 15:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • The denial of protection was made on the basis that the IP editor was blocked due to his behavior and the declining administrator thought there was no need for protection anymore. However, like I stated, the IP editor continued with his unsourced edits and verbal attacks the very next morning from another IP address. EkoGraf (talk) 16:23, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I got the new IP blocked at WP:AIV, but I still think protection is worthwhile. There is no indication that he will stop. RGloucester — ☎ 16:35, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Sockpuppets of Borishuang and some other vandals keep adding false information "the title Eu". Many of the accounts that do this seem to be vandalism-only accounts.Warrenkychu (talk) 15:27, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 year. EdJohnston (talk) 21:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fans are attempting to declare him "immortal". Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 04:25, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 22:42, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Someone is trying to de-confirm this person's sexuality. George Ho (talk) 22:25, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 21:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes, edit-warring, adding cruft, and other disruptive editing by IPs. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 21:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

30 June 2014

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:05, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Req: 1 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. Persistent vandalism over the last few days, typically involving blanking, introduction of nonsense and data corruption. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping user (66.87.80.57 / 66.87.80.0 / 66.87.83.2) continues to add unsourced British airdates for this series across numerous articles. Attempts to discuss the matter with them via their talk pages have only resulted in the user hopping to another IP to insert their POV. It's fine if the content appears in the article, but it must be properly sourced. Requesting 1 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. I will be submitting copies of this request for the other affected articles. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has only been going on for a day or two, so let's try 4 days and reprotect if needed. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping user (66.87.80.57 / 66.87.80.0 / 66.87.83.2) continues to add unsourced British airdates for this series across numerous articles. Attempts to discuss the matter with them via their talk pages have only resulted in the user hopping to another IP to insert their POV. It's fine if the content appears in the article, but it must be properly sourced. Requesting 1 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. I will be submitting copies of this request for the other affected articles. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has only been going on for a day or two, so let's try 4 days and reprotect if needed. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping user (66.87.80.57 / 66.87.80.0 / 66.87.83.2) continues to add unsourced British airdates for this series across numerous articles. Attempts to discuss the matter with them via their talk pages have only resulted in the user hopping to another IP to insert their POV. It's fine if the content appears in the article, but it must be properly sourced. Requesting 1 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. I will be submitting copies of this request for the other affected articles. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has only been going on for a day or two, so let's try 4 days and reprotect if needed. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping user (66.87.80.57 / 66.87.80.0 / 66.87.83.2) continues to add unsourced British airdates for this series across numerous articles. Attempts to discuss the matter with them via their talk pages have only resulted in the user hopping to another IP to insert their POV. It's fine if the content appears in the article, but it must be properly sourced. Requesting 1 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. I will be submitting copies of this request for the other affected articles. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has only been going on for a day or two, so let's try 4 days and reprotect if needed. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rovine - Wanna talk? - What do I think? 00:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Unfortunate, as there seems to be a regular feed of constructive edits from IPs. Edit count too high for pending changes protection. Let's see how things are after a week. — MusikAnimal talk 20:33, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent attempts to add information on a leaked pilot, without sufficient commentary to warrant such inclusion. Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:11, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully semi-protection will ignite some discussion. — MusikAnimal talk 20:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 2-3 week protection against IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. Persistent vandal (See Fidelis ofoajoku continues to disrupt a variety of articles. In this article, he once again added a variety of hoax content here (Note absurd list of countries involved in this anime). User appears to be using mobile devices, and the advice I received from DoRD was to ask for page protection on the affected pages, since it would be ineffective to attempt range blocks on the user. Thanks!. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:37, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I hope I or somebody else remembers to restore Pending Changes after this expires. Bishonen | talk 19:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:15, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Fixed4u (talk) 15:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most edits seem to be good-faith, but protected for edit warring. A solid source backing the subject's club change might put the dispute to rest. — MusikAnimal talk 19:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: It's transfer season in football, magnified by the World Cup, and this guy is one of the star names. IP's and other non-auto-confirmed types are going back and forth with this article, inserting false news that he's moved to one team or another, and leaving snarky comments about other teams. I would prefer for protection to last until Sept 1 (close of transfer window), or sooner, if and when there is RS announcement that player has been transferred. Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 07:28, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's best not to be preemptive with page protection, let's see where we stand after a week. — MusikAnimal talk 19:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

semi-protection: block users and be admin of page and stop editing without permission . some users edit just text for fun then purpose they attitude with legal proof to cheat the facts and get away

Declined Same reason as before, read the protection policy. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: ongoing unconstructive/unsourced edits to BLP. NiciVampireHeart 16:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Most IP edits seem constructive, with this edit well-sourced and relevant, yet was still undone. Edit count too high for pending changes protection. — MusikAnimal talk 15:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ruddah (talk) 22:15, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Fluffernutter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 11:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users continue to vandalize personal life and infobox. LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Mike V (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (2 weeks) tutterMouse (talk) 11:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Discussion is at Talk:2014 in LGBT rights#This article is not a list of rights, it's a list of events but page protection is required to motivate editor to participate. Dennis Bratland (talk) 14:32, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There hasn't been a good edit by non-confirmed users. George Ho (talk) 08:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 05:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping editor seems to want to change one band member's name. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Appears there may be some truth to the IP's sourced changes. — MusikAnimal talk 05:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Problems yet again with this article. Over the last couple years it has been pared down and tended to remove large amounts of dubious material from fan blogs and other inappropriate sources. As before it has become an edit war with both anonymous IPs and registered users engaging in some sort of inter-fan argument through the page (see the page history for details, including users calling each other out by username, etc.). Recent attempts to remove the offending/badly sourced material have been met with instant reversions from anon IPs and the aforementioned registered users. I would recommend at least 3 weeks of cool-down time with the article in its current state (the mentioned fan-blog sources removed until discussion can occur). KingHooves (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like the talk page is serving it's purpose. — MusikAnimal talk 04:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism and vandalism from a vandalism-only account. I've warned the vandal, but to no avail. 23 editor (talk) 16:15, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Disruption seems to have passed. Report user to AIV if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 04:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With the Money in the Bank pay-per-view ending just hours ago, vandals are now targeting the next pay-per-view chronologically. Ogyaf (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Edit war underway. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC is not holding off frequent edits lately. George Ho (talk) 08:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP's. Vandals are criticizing his failure to perform any pull-ups at the 2014 NHL Combine by replacing stats in his Career Statistics section with 0 in "honour" of his failures, and altering his opening bio paragraph. Maybe semi-protect for a week, until all of the hype has died? Thanks MTG1989 (talk) 04:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: With the event happening live, there's no way to keep up with pending revisions. I request it either be eliminated or upgraded to a normal semi-protection. CRRaysHead90 | #RaysUp 00:09, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been vandalized several times by different IP's. A temporary protection might be of any help. Skr15081997 (talk) 06:33, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 18:40, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – (I'd like for 2 weeks) Massive disruption from IPs in the past few days. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 04:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Archive/2014/06&oldid=1146811271"