Talk:Jabba the Hutt

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jabba the Hutt article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Jabba the Hutt is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 15, 2006.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 7, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
July 10, 2006	Featured article candidate	Promoted
January 24, 2007	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted
March 12, 2022	Featured article review	Demoted
Current status: Former featured article

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Star Wars High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Jabba's family

Hello! I would like to hear from a few editors about the infobox on this page, specifically the "Family" section. In the interest of keeping the infobox short and presenting only key details about Jabba, I removed a number of his family members. I retained only three relatives: Gorga, Ziro, and Rotta. These Hutts are mentioned either in the body of the article, or in the Star Wars Databank, or both. The ones I removed are not mentioned in either, leading me to the conclusion that they're not important enough to retain in the infobox.

Another editor has restored the family members I removed, feeling that they are important to mention. You can view our conversation here. I'm going to reach out to @TAnthony and @Cukie Gherkin, because I've spoken with both of them about Star Wars character infoboxes in the past. Could you two please offer your thoughts?

Thanks! Wafflewombat (talk) 03:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am of the opinion that the infobox should only cover the most pertinent of details. For example, if the family members are trivial, leave them out. If the gender is obvious (judgment call), leave it out. If they're just a human, don't specify their species. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the swift reply. The problem might be that in one person's eyes, these family members are important, but in another's, they are trivial. Do you have any thoughts about how to resolve such differences? Wafflewombat (talk) 03:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it was necessary, the best solution would be to gain consensus. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]