User talk:Trichinosis

Welcome!

Hello, Trichinosis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Muslim Patrol, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Muslim Patrol

The article Muslim Patrol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a news outlet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muslim Patrol for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muslim Patrol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Patrol until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trichinosis, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Trichinosis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How to redact IP address from history when you forgot to log in?

Regarding this topic ... Somebody_deleted_intermediate_edits

And per polarscribe's description, I have wanted to do this before when I forgot to log in. Can you tell me how to do this? Cheers. --Rangeblock victim (talk) 19:56, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Email oversight-en-wp@wikipedia.org and ask nicely. WP:RFO has more information on this. Trichinosis (talk) 20:08, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, matey. Thanks for the reply! --Rangeblock victim (talk) 20:24, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sharia patrols (London) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharia patrols (London) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharia patrols (London) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thank you for your great expansion of Operation Trojan Horse '''tAD''' (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tolerating my constant tinkering and some rather substantial changes. :) Trichinosis (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Trojan Horse

Hi, here's a task for you tomorrow as I may be busy with other commitments and it's too late now to start.

The "Reactions" section can do with a media sub-section, as the right-wing and left-wing media have different opinions on the causes, effects and cures to this episode. Daily Mail have done editorials, Gilligan of the Telegraph has written half our article, Guardian and Independent journalists have criticised faith schools in general, Guardian, Independent, Huff Post and Socialist Worker have been largely sceptical.

Also, in the political section, George Galloway is a prominent reactionary to cases such as these, and has been tweeting that he believes that the whole scenario is a hoax. Salma Yaqoob has also been notably active. It's important that we balance the article with views from these figures, which has attracted its own attention. Cheers and good luck! '''tAD''' (talk) 23:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'd been kinda deliberately avoiding any sort of media section with their analysis seeing as there are so many different view out there. Some maintain it's all a hoax that's been perpetrated by Islamophobic neocons, others view it as specifically a British Muslim problem, some say "Problem? No problem and long may it continue!" and others yet have urged faith schools in general should be abolished (despite that the schools concerned were not faith schools.) Presenting this smorgasbord of views in an elegant way without being cluttered with the clamant sermonising of lightweight commentators will be difficult and I don't really have the inclination for anything difficult at the moment - there is a World Cup, a Test series and sunshine to enjoy.

I'll keep a look out for some coverage of the reactions of Galloway and co. but I'd rather not include it unless mentioned in the mainstream press.

Trichinosis (talk) 01:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haha I have World Cup and exams. Yaqoob's involvement has definitely been featured on BBC TV and online, so it's worth mentioning. Yes, all these views could become a headache - not for the casual editor at all! '''tAD''' (talk) 11:16, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck

I've removed Operation Trojan Horse from my watchlist now, I don't think I have the resolve to cover political controversies anymore, plus the story is most likely 95% at its conclusion now so the only edits will be reverting vandalism or flagrant POV. Anyway, thank you for contributing so much to an article which I created, and good luck in improving it in the future! Eventually, ask for a peer review from one of its WikiProjects (I think WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom is most relevant) to get it to C-class. '''tAD''' (talk) 09:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 18 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Operation Trojan Horse page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Trichinosis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]