User talk:Ejoe2

Welcome!

Hello, Ejoe2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 04:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, Ejoe2 aka Sanyet aka Loperw aka Blocked Watson System=scumbag, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. 122.16.131.206 (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sanyet, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. 122.16.131.206 (talk) 17:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Your recent editing history at Kazuhide Uekusa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. DAJF (talk) 05:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Kazuhide Uekusa, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 122.26.193.33 (talk) 01:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is Wikipedia policy to delete libelous material when it has been identified[1]. It doesn't matter if there is a citation or not for the libel. WP:LIBEL WP:LIBEL YOU DID THE SAME MISTAKES BY MULTIPLE IP ADDRESSES. YOU ARE WRONG ENOUGH. Ejoe2 (talk) 01:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in a discussion at Talk:Kazuhide Uekusa before reverting again. So far, you are the only one who thinks it is libelous. 122.26.193.33 (talk) 01:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion about the definition of "libel"?

Hi, Ejoe2. I see you continue to remove valid sourced text from the Kazuhide Uekusa article, under the pretext of "libel", but have you actually stopped to read the definition of libel at the page you keep linking to (Wikipedia:Libel, with more in-depth explanation at Defamation)? Libel (or defamation) is when a harmful statement is false. In the case of Uekusa, it is an indisputable fact that he was arrested in 2004 and 2006 for sex offenses, and sources have been provided in the article to back this up (pretty easy since it was so widely reported in the media). Unfortunately, just shouting "libel" does not allow you to remove sourced statements about facts that you or Uekusa might not like or agree with. --DAJF (talk) 01:39, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Kazuhide Uekusa

I notice that you have continued to edit-war at Kazuhide Uekusa despite the warnings and explanations on your talk page above. Please consider this a final warning - if you continue to edit-war without first discussing your proposed edits at Talk:Kazuhide Uekusa and finding a consensus, I will block you from editing for a period of time at my discretion. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 08:46, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's too clear for us if you read his own article in which the person Uekusa stated that Wikipedia contains various false contents(URL: http://uekusak.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2010/11/post-5ec3.html). And I edited its page and will reedit it until there is no more libels against the person from Wikipedia. You have to notice that who continues the war is not me but the multiple account user. I have to protect Uekusa from any violation of human rights. URL: http://uekusak.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2010/11/post-5ec3.html Ejoe2 (talk) 16:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have to protect Uekusa from any violation of human rights

Dear Ejoe, please see NeilN Talk page. You have unintentionally intruded in a section that is all about a conversation between me and NeilN. Please present your views in a new section in that page. Please don't intrude with your topic in the section I have begun. I hope you would understand. Thank you. Arghyan Opinions (talk) 18:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]