User talk:Mmddyy28

User Page Talk Page Adoption Course Adoption Requests Subpages To Do

Archives

RFA

Last question hasn't been answered since asked weeks ago. --Mmddyy28 (Contact Me Here) 20:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I have un-transcluded your RFA, as it wasn't even filled out! You will want to read WP:RFAADVICE very carefully - with barely 2 months on the project and less than 500 edits, you're about 6x short on the duration, and 10x short on the number of contributions the panda ₯’ 00:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@DangerousPanda, I am not seeing an RFA template on the edit box, or the page anywhere.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mmddyy28

Speedy Deletion was declined. Mmddyy28 (Contact Me Here) 15:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mmddyy28, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Nothing here. Editor shows clear misunderstanding of how this works.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. United States Man (talk) 00:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Fairly Odd Summer

Incident taken care of and resolved. --Mmddyy28 (Contact Me Here) 15:34, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Your speedy deletion tagging of A Fairly Odd Summer was inappropriate. The article had content when you placed the tag. If you feel the subject is not notable nominate it for deletion using the WP:AFD process. Also your edit summary when you added the incorrect speedy deletion tag back onto the article was wrong. You stated that only the tag placer or an admin can remove the tag, actually any editor other than the creator can remove the tag. GB fan 13:50, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

May 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 19:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: I was never informed of a discussion. -Mmddyy28 (Contact Me Here) 19:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there has to always be a discussion, if an admin comes across a user being disruptive (like blanking talkpages and what not) then they can block the user if they feel the need.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 19:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't entitled to warnings or multiple chances: you edit-warred with another user in their userspace and continued after they specifically asked you to stop, which certainly counts as a warning. Edits of that kind amount to harassment. Acroterion (talk) 20:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Trisha Paytas. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 01:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]