Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2014/03

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2014

01 March 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Referee just gave a penalty and supporters not happy. QED237 (talk) 16:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Comments I left at the article's talk page were ignored. Jetstreamer Talk 16:23, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by different IPs on a regular basis. Kierzek (talk) 15:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the extant pending changes protection seems sufficient. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continuous vandalisms by different IPs . Zayeem (talk) 11:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, it's so sporadic that a temporary semi-protection wouldn't do much good. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:16, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 17:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The page's history looks like a battlefield. Misleading and disruptive to others. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There's been no edits to the article since February 21. Diannaa (talk) 15:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Custom error page (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection: Not sure why HJ Mitchell protected this in the first place, but I see no reason for this redirect to an unprotected page which had no intermittent issues between being converted to a redirect and protection still needs any protection. Thanks. Since I see by the contribution history that HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) is very active on responding to these requests, I won't bother annoying them with a duplicate post on their talk page. ;) Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 17:05, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. There were some serious problems a few years ago with redirects to HTTP 404, so I protected them all en masse. This wasn't one of them, so I'll unprotect it, but I'm curious what prompted this request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Text is being warred back into the biography, supported in some cases by no references, or by poor references (Facebook, etc.) or by good references that are misrepresented. Binksternet (talk) 15:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that I may process the edit requested. Thank you. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 12:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:36, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template-editor. 10k transclusions doesn't seem to be worthy of administrator-only settings. Template:Col-begin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) has 360k transclusions and seems to be doing just fine with template-editor. I think this just hasn't been changed since the new template editor group started up. meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:34, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Just came off temp semi-protection set up because of constant IP vandalism, already the problem has resumed. High profile, easy vandalism target. Best if it's permanently semi'd. oknazevad (talk) 14:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations and suspected WP:COI violation – IP users (sock puppets) continue to add promotional material. -- Ohc ¡digame! 13:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:18, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP users (sock puppets) continue to change her birthday without sources. . LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Vandalism, multiple accounts. JNW (talk) 09:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Google Doodle - very visible, prone to vandalism. Jamesx12345 11:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 15:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 22:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 15:36, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing attempts by suspected sock puppets to insert biased content has now been picked up by numerous IPs who ignore the consensus reached on the talk page that such material is inappropriate and should not be included. Tiller54 (talk) 17:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 15:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes privilege where it has become tedious to combat it. STATic message me! 17:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Changed to semi-protection, one week to start. Please re-report if the disruption continues when theprotection wears off. Diannaa (talk) 15:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Various IPs keep deleting Galor's year of birth (although it is publicly available information), without ever stating a reason. I'm tired of reverting the article and asking those IPs for their reasons on their respective talk pages. None ever answered. So now, please, semi-protect the article for at least a month. --bender235 (talk) 08:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for one week to start. Please re-apply if the activity resumes when the protection wears off. Diannaa (talk) 15:23, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

temporary semi-protection a very dynamic IP has been repeatedly inserting a promotional NPOV version over the past week plus. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 15:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing vandalism by Anonymous user 218.204.52.138‎. Chewings72 (talk) 00:16, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.: The open proxy has been blocked for a year. Mike V • Talk 03:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakr\ talk / 02:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Recent death of a former living person. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 23:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 01:43, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent levels of IP vandalism.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Declined yesterday; nothing has changed. Diannaa (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPv6-editor who has persisted in adding a Category that is not supported by the text despite being reverted on different occasions by two other editors, despite hidden comment asking for this issue to first be discussed on article talk page before adding this unsupported content. Shearonink (talk) 04:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 04:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: from the article's creator. Strong COI, edit warring for several weeks to include unsourced content and insignificant mention in the media. JNW (talk) 14:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Since the user is autoconfirmed, semi-protection will not stop him from editing the article. Diannaa (talk) 01:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the website references and reference of former judge ahmedi is only his personal opinion and cannot be stated as fact. their is no legal standing on the claims. Mufaddalqn (talk) 11:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Due to the amount of IP noise over the past couple of days, hopefully the semi will let it calm down; FYI Mifter. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism from multiple addresses over the past month. LT910001 (talk) 02:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 03:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs changing Wally to Waldo. Auric talk 00:11, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 01:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent edit warring by IP editors and WP:SPAs trying to establish nickname as "Sixx" though the WP:RSes found consistently identify him as "Six" . Roberticus (talk) 23:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 03:55, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:36, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 01:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 17:38, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive edits. SMS Talk 16:52, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 01:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User request . [[User:A915|A915]] a (talk) 15:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, no vandalism. No need for port. Please don't keep re-posting this silly request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism, with some constructive edits from new and unregistered editors. BassHero55 (Message me) 14:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Current event and controversial. Theparties (talk) 11:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:36, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism . CFCF (talk · contribs · email) 10:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting quite a bit of IP-vandalism. CFCF (talk · contribs · email) 08:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request to reduce protection level on Bolsheviks back to semi:

I originally requested this page be protected, but the protection came too late before one of the two problematic editors readded material that had been tagged as unsourced since 2011 and 2012.

Nonetheless, it seems that at least the other of those two editors is willing to have a good faith discussion about the issue on the talk page, so I request that the article protection be changed from full back to semi so that sources can be added, and for my part I will refrain from reverting as this dialogue process plays out.

(I made a version of this request a couple of days ago on the protecting admin's talk page, but he has not been active since then). --El Chivo 2 (talk) 20:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – The full protection has only five days still to run. Why not try to reach an agreement on the talk page about the disputed passage. If you get agreement, the protection can be lifted. EdJohnston (talk) 21:06, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 21:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Drunk in Paris (talk) 20:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: The family and friends of the article subject are trying to manipulate history and are claiming things that cited obituaries in The New York Times, the New York Post and Newsday simply do not say. At least one has registered as an WP:SPA, and over the course of days this seems to have become a campaign for them. No obituary gives a cause of death, and neither does the article. Family and friends have a campaign to blame it on a flu shot, which is fringe science and not stated in any of the highly WP:RS sources mentioned here.

A contributing reason: The family and friends have recruited a blogger who urges his readers, "Let's Correct Wikipedia on Something!" — even though, as Talk:Al Plastino shows, the blogger himself is factually incorrect. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I need to point our that one of the family/friends editors appears to be suggesting he'll be right back at as soon as the week-long protection expires: "I don't think it's 'moot', since it will be up for editing in a week." [1]. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:35, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

02 March 2014

Temporary smile-protection: persistent blanking by various users (socking suspected) in recent days. BethNaught (talk) 13:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection persistent vandalism. 117Avenue (talk) 08:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Connormah (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Armbrust The Homunculus 15:06, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection persistent vandalism. 117Avenue (talk) 08:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. by Connormah (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Armbrust The Homunculus 15:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi protection Highly visible gay athlete in Pro sports, looks to be perennial target for vandalism, history filling up with reverts. Sportfan5000 (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 16:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism in past 2 months. Jamesx12345 09:13, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 07:09, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People are constantly adding information without citing their sources. After we take the information out, people keep adding it back in. It is mostly by people who are not logged in. I think it would be best to allow auto-confirmed users and higher to edit the page. AustinPuppyUSA (talk) 04:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly-visible navbox now. Some ip users try to add own POV information different from Euromaidan catmain article's infobox. [2] [3]. NickSt (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Also not enough activity. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Must extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 22:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:40, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits from IPs. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 07:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 08:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of information about unofficial transaction by new users and IPs. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:59, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection, seems to be a perennial target for negative information on a BLP. Sportfan5000 (talk) 07:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nothing more than vandalism in the past few days. ZappaOMati 05:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:54, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent IP SPAM, COPYVIO, and likely COI. – voidxor (talk | contrib) 04:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:53, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism. Ben Ben (talk) 04:23, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:49, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism related to current events 96.52.52.136 (talk) 03:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:46, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Gloss • talk 22:15, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

full protection Have registered editor adding unverifiable source (nonexistent or clearly wrong langauge websites) which I (twice) reverse for said reason then report to 3RR frivolously with out any time given to discuss. Spshu (talk) 18:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 08:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 05:47, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 21:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Disruptive editor(s) were both blocked. Please re-report if situation worsens. Diannaa (talk) 01:54, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Yet more vandalism from unregistered users. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 50.177.68.59 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) blocked for 6 months by another admin. Diannaa (talk) 01:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors to a BLP. STATic message me! 23:35, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 01:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The talk page indicates some sort of content dispute regarding the Drivers' Table. I suggest a block of about three weeks until either the dispute is resolved or until the season starts, when we'll have more to talk about. Aerospeed (Talk) 22:23, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 01:30, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To allow me to process request for edit. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 16:59, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. You found that the edit request contained insufuficient information, and such a widely used template shouldn't be edited without thought and discussion. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Violations of BLP policy and continuous acts of vandalism. IPadPerson (talk) 02:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC is not prevent high vandalism. George Ho (talk) 22:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism due to incident in today's game. A week's protection might deter. Egghead06 (talk) 22:03, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 19:57, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The edits in question involve only one individual IP at a time. It would be much more practical to just block it. Mike V • Talk 20:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike V: The IP user has been doing it since August, and considering some user summaries' the IP is a banned user. Considering this revert of my previous unexistant revert, the user is just trolling and there should be no reason to let him continue trolling, at least that page. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 21:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When I approach RFPP, I look at the situation and see what technical options would resolve the issue while producing the least amount of collateral damage as possible. In this case, the individual has been editing a variety of pages multiple times and (to my knowledge) has been restricting his or her editing to just one IP at a time. From my perspective, it would be much better to block an individual IP than semi-protect 10+ pages. If we keep semi-protecting articles, the user will likely just keep jumping around to different articles until he or she gets bored. Mike V • Talk 22:34, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:MariaJaydHicky. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 19:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 22:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose This request follows immediately after Lukeno94's revert of reasonable changes, which he has not raised on the talk page, and not justified in his edit summary. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - This template is transcluded on hundreds of thousands of pages, so changes should not be made to it without proper discussion. Recent changes have been made by users with knowledge of wikicode, but that will not always be the case and the template should be protected against unscrupulous hands. – PeeJay 23:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Highly visible template that should not be modified by somebody that does not understand what they are doing. JMHamo (talk) 23:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just incase anyone else isn't aware... requests for page protection isn't a vote. An administrator will review the request and make a decision. Gloss • talk 23:11, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected I've template protected the page on the sole basis that it is a highly visible template on 100,000+ pages. If there are requests to adjust the template, then discussion should occur on the talk page. Once a clear consensus has been reached a template editor or administrator can makes these changes. Mike V • Talk 23:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC protection is not holding off a lot of vandalism lately since semi-protection ended on 22 Feb. I'd like to contact the protecting admin, but... that's only when I would be requesting extension of PC time. George Ho (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 01:27, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Shifting IP aggressively readding dubious, unsourced content against consensus. McGeddon (talk) 19:35, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support – I was just adding the same when I noticed this one. I think it's not sock-puppetry so much as just a dynamic IP, but he won't listen to the four editors telling him that his unsourced how-to section is not right for WP, and it's tiresome to have to revert him one to two times daily. Dicklyon (talk) 00:53, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

03 March 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism is beginning to pick up again. . — Maile (talk) 19:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 19:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Vandalism; specifically more on the "Downloadable Content" page where people constantly put unconfirmed songs on there. --Wiiboy829 (talk) 23:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There's a handful of IP and new editors that are coming along to change the plot about this movie to make a specific scene more harsher than it was portrayed (the accepted wording having been discussed on the talk page before these edits). . MASEM (t) 22:54, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 18:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption with IPs changing nationality of player. QED237 (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:07, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued IP vandalism (last IP admits PP lapsed so it was ok to edit). ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 18:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:09, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The same constant additions of WP:OR that got the page protected before. STATic message me! 18:20, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Dispute between users on article name. I have noted reasons in take page but ignored. I wish it to remain as Good Morning Britain (2014) but other Good Morning Britain (TV programme). This is Drew (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:01, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by different IPs on a regular basis. Kierzek (talk) 17:35, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by sock using multiple IPs (again). DonIago (talk) 15:41, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Body weight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unexplained blanking of sourced content by different IPs. bonadea contributions talk 14:20, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – The subject is holding a political office (Chief Minister of West Bengal) and often subjected to vandalism or insertion/deletion of POV statements. This article needs indefinite pending changes protection to prevent BLP violations. Amartyabag TALK2ME 07:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Portal contents pages

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandal by sock of 1abacada. GZWDer (talk) 12:15, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User blocked, not enough disruption (on each individual portal). --kelapstick(bainuu) 13:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism since February. -- LuK3 (Talk) 05:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:23, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been a cause of edit warring. Summichum (talk) 06:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Reporting user blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Freshh! (talk) 00:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Warn vandal/disruptive editor then report to WP:AIV. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced additions, vandalism and other disruptive changes by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 18:24, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (by someone else) kelapstick(bainuu) 14:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks of Bhural and LanguageXpert back to edit warring after last protection expired. SMS Talk 17:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful IP edits that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 15:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, it'll probably calm down now. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 22:05, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by an anon IP hopper. STATic message me! 21:58, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that I may process the edit request (I've already done a similar request on Template:Infobox book). — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 05:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. by Mr. Stradivarius. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs hell bent on using a bad image (by bad meaning it's a bad headshot, and probably has political undertones to it). –HTD 06:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs consistently changing the episode counts, going against CBS's official source. Gloss • talk 04:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent edit-warring, POV and unsourced edits, as well as BLP violations from IP that has already been blocked. Plot Spoiler (talk) 01:14, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection : due to relentless vandalism, changing the musician's second (i.e. maternal) surname from Gomes to Gómez almost daily (see [4]). Thanks. Quis separabit? 23:30, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I thought it was a persistent unlogging and IP-hopping troll deleting content (including most of the article's lead summary), but apparently it's just a genuily misguided newbie IP editor. Anyway, it's not stopping deleting content without reaching conensus. (Will edit myself if convincing arguments are presented, or other estabilished-user watchers can do it.) --Niemti (talk) 15:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected by EdJohnston (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) for 2 days. Armbrust The Homunculus 05:09, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Commented out bits being persistently added back into the article for no reason (they're notes to explain the bit of text, not removed content, so it's a very weird set of edits). Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:23, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 00:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Live event, excessive vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 04:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Diannaa (talk) 04:38, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ///EuroCarGT 21:53, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated postings by IP addresses for banned user. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Reverting and ignoring is already being implemented, and allows non-banned IPs to comment on other matters. Diannaa (talk) 00:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Was already create protected unless autoconfirmed, upgraded to admin. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bot is incorrect, the page got protected ok. This item may have to be manually archived, -- Diannaa (talk) 03:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 04:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requested yesterday, but another IP is still doing the same sort of unconstructive/unreliably sourced editing. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:24, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lukeno94:, you requested an incorrect page. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 21:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 00:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – All day edit warring between vested editors and opponents, No desire to agree despite talk page discussions. 3RR has been breached. Report by uninvolved editor. Leaky Caldron 19:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 00:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Since the previous protection template was lifted on 28 December 2013 (due to previous persistent vandalism) in just over two months since 28 December 2013, I have counted up at least 25 acts of vandalism on the viewing history of the page. This, in my view, is clearly too many instances of persistent vandalism in the past couple of months. Hazard, as a very high-profile footballer (currently rated by his manager José Mourinho as the best young footballer in the world) will undoubtedly continue to be the target of vandalism on the Wikipedia page unless another protection template is put in place. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 00:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent name vandlism. It stopped for a while now it starts again. SlightSmile 20:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:48, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jimbo Wales (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Sock-puppetry: Persistent posts by IP addresses for banned user. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two edits is not enough to protect this page. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:24, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP repeatedly adding unsourced content. The Banner talk 08:22, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

04 March 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is struck by long-term persistent vandalism, to the degree that almost no constructive edits can be seen on the history page. CFCF (talk · contribs · email) 20:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1001 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of erroneous figures . SMS Talk 19:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi to prevent the sock itself from vandalizing the page. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please remove this addition [5] protect the page. IP needs an incentive to discuss instead of revert. See also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#IP vandalising climate data for months. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:35, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of errors by some IP editors. SMS Talk 10:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:23, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: In the last day the article has been completely flooded by IP editing, mostly from IPs that rarely or have never contributed before, and mostly in disregard of sources. Not all editing has been vandalism but protection for a short time (maybe a week) would be very helpful. This is probably happening because of the conflict in the Crimea. Darouet (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, just as I made this post! Thank you. -Darouet (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. (Duplicate request) Orlady (talk) 21:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This just came off a protection and, as expected, is up for reverting IP/new editors (and im not the only only reverting). Please lock this for longer, precedence shows is unstable till the election in May.Lihaas (talk) 07:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also Pending-changes protected until June. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Being tampered with by the subject of the investigation. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Orlady (talk) 20:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:

Due to current Ukrainian-Russian crisis, the article on this far-right party has become a POV magnet for both its supporters and opponents. It comes from IPs/newly registered accounts. Endless POV/OR insertions [6], vandalism [7] (the call was a fake), erasures of reliable information [8], [9].Lokalkosmopolit (talk) 15:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Orlady (talk) 20:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This was semi-protected 7 years ago, and I think that since it is a portal, it should be given another shot at unprotection. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

24 transclucions, should be downgraded to TE or semi. — Lfdder (talk) 11:59, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Dropped to TE; I'm not comfortable downgrading it any further because, frankly, I don't know what it does, but the porotectiong admin, Joy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), is still active so you could ask them. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Anna (talk) 19:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Orlady (talk) 20:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Anna (talk) 17:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Orlady (talk) 20:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very visible article, the film having just won Best Picture at the Academy Awards, recent string of anonymous vandalism. BOVINEBOY2008 12:00, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the vandalism doesn't die down after that expires, please ask for an extension of the protection. Orlady (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations. Launchballer 08:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Orlady (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Covalense (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected kelapstick(bainuu) 15:53, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Once again, yes it has. --kelapstick(bainuu) 18:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: adding promotional material and spam links by IP's. :-ChanderForYou 06:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Orlady (talk) 19:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Since protection was removed there has been persistent vandalism.Anna (talk) 22:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Orlady (talk) 19:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP violations. There is news that this player in the MLB is about to sign a minor league deal for the Baltimore Orioles but this is not fully 100% legit yet. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 22:10, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Lyons (actor, entrepreneur). The author, "Stephaniemcqueen (talk · contribs)" - quite obviously a sock, is restoring the vanity article to this page which should be a disambiguation page listing notable Steve Lyonses - this is the correct version. Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by sock puppets of user:Aftab222000. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:15, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It seems to have stopped. Please ask again if it resumes. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Many people have been adding speculation to the page. The announcement will be coming in the morning about this season's cast, so this will likely continue into the next week or two. Gloss • talk 02:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 05:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits. SMS Talk 22:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Important leader and IP magnet. --Ekabhishektalk 05:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP hopper. Freshh! (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP hopper. Freshh! (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP hopper. Freshh! (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Freshh:: There isn't an article associated with the title you've provided and I can't find it with a quick search. Could you provide a link to the article? Thanks! Mike V • Talk 02:28, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's when, not where; I've fixed the title. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP hopper. Freshh! (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of IP editor try change nationality of this player about to play for a new national team. . QED237 (talk) 21:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Good ask the protection of this article as a new user, he insists on wanting to impose his view violating rules wikipedia, is a little tired having to eliminate these issues, I have left a message to the user and what he did was ignore I hope you can do something. Because to me it feels uncomfortable having to reverse their issues all the time. Greetings. GeorgeMilan (Talk) 02:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:59, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 24 hour protection. Lithuanian IP 78.56.70.222, which a few days ago made an inflammatory POV edit here, came to this article and inserted a bunch of wikilinks in the English translation of this song. They are, in essence, soapboxing through wikilinks by introducing modern events (2014 street riots, for example) into a translation of the Ukranian national anthem. I nominated them at AIV. Now a different IP from North Carolina (184.3.167.160) has reverted my repair of this disruption. Requesting 24-48 hour protection from IPs. Though I wouldn't normally request protection for 2 instances of disruption, the recent political situation in the Ukraine qualifies this article as high profile. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 00:18, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I don't know what's going on there, but it doens't look like vandalism. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An army of single-purpose accounts keeps on introducing an alleged daughter of this Rothschild, without giving any reliable source. I started a discussion on this on the article's talk page. Please protect the article for now. --bender235 (talk) 16:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: At least one of the editors is autoconfirmed, semiprotection will not affect their editing. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, so the bot can archive this. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection, editing dispute about BLPs calling one a child molester. Sportfan5000 (talk) 22:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This may be calming now, it's at the BLPN board. Sportfan5000 (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The situation looks to have been resolved through talk page discussion. Please feel free to re-post if the situation changes., Diannaa (talk) 19:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive and dubious unsourced edits by anon IP editors. At the very least the page needs pending changes. STATic message me! 20:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the history is a mess, but I can't see whst's disrputive about the edits. Re-submit with a more detailed explanation if you think protection is necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User Mattedia insists on inserting crank content and unreverting it instead of discussing on talk page. Edit war hasn't quite declared itself, but it's heading that way. He appears ignorant and obstinate, but I would tray to argue with him more patiently on the Talk page of the article. Cuzkatzimhut (talk) 19:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC). Cuzkatzimhut (talk) 19:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC) Amendment: there has not been feared counter-reverting activity in the last 24 hours, so perhaps the request for protection could be suspended or delayed. Cuzkatzimhut (talk) 17:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Suggest you seek input from other at a relevant noticeboard (WP:ANI, WP:ANEW, maybe WP:AE). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:14, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Protect this page for two weeks because IP users making harassing comments/disruptive edits on page when their cricket team loses any match. UBStalk 16:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent (same?) IP vandalism resumed immediately after expiration of previous period of semi-protection. Fat&Happy (talk) 20:07, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Anonymous IP vandalism and potential conflict of interests between editors. Urgent. KingHiggins (talk) 18:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, it's busy, but there's not that much vandalism. With it being a crrent event, we may see a lot of constructive edits from IPs. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Seems a bit busier than normal. SlightSmile 14:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, that's because it's this week or is it next week?) I think; it'll die down after that. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very popular video game, particularly with young audiences. A lot of IP activity, either unconstructive or downright vandalism. Soetermans. T / C 11:07, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 04:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, there are good-faith IP edits, and it'll probably calm down in a day or two on the dust from the Oscars settles. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

05 March 2014

Highly visible page, constant edit warring by sock puppets/SPAs representing one or the other side. Established users have trouble finding consensus and it really doesn't help if new (?) accounts with 10 previous edits or so start to enforce their way. --Lokalkosmopolit (talk) 15:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, it's busy, which is to be expected, but I'm nowhere near convinced that the disruption is sufficient to justify shutting out all new editors and IPs, who may have a lot to add. Further, a lot of the reverting seems to be experienced editors reverting each other, not reversion of IPs and brand new accounts. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. SMS Talk 15:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. SMS Talk 15:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP-hopper keeps adding wholly inappropriate images onto the page. Can you also put the images they love to insert on the Bad Image List as well? Crboyer (talk) 20:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden recent increase in vandalism. Diannaa (talk) 19:50, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1001 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The sudden increase seems to be because a previous long-term protection expired a few months ago. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection template was removed yesterday, within 12 hours, sockpuppet Banclark31 (sock of FanforClarl / Unorginal) was vandalizing article. Article is frequent, high profile target (children's television) for vandalism and specific sock operators. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:49, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Deliberate removal of content by disruptive IP editors. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:09, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American entry into World War I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection; renewed persistent IP vandalism Joefromrandb (talk) 06:39, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Football player about to change club in summer (1 July) announced today so many IP disruptive edits. Perhaps even PC until summer?. QED237 (talk) 17:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 16:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:26, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Highly visible page due to the ongoing conflict. Constant partisan POV edits by SPAs/sock puppets. Typical example a few minutes ago: [10].15:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Lokalkosmopolit (talk)

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: This page is created in accordance with all legislative assemblies elections as listed in Legislative Assembly elections in India. So please don't move this page to any other page. Logical1004 (talk) 12:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I can't see any need to protect. GedUK  12:49, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Both the people are still claimants and this is a major point of controversy which characterizes Mufaddal. There is a significant population which supports Khuzaima as the Dai. This article is persistently vandalized by making him the 53rd dai which he is not. Moreover both the head quaters of the sect are legally owned by Khuzaima who was the second in command and they have started to pursue this matter legally as billions of dollar of property is on stake and has been forcibly taken over by Mufaddal. Summichum (talk) 07:13, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  12:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yunshui 雲‍水 15:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I fear some editor might try to vandalize this page. Mufaddalqn (talk) 11:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary but long term. IP-disguise of this sockfarm active.: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NYCSlover/Archive. This article is one his favorite subjects. The Banner talk 11:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. Can better act as honey pot. The Banner talk 11:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User:ParrotOfDoom consistently reverts my edits, makes unwarrented racial allegations, and WP:OWN . Atsme (talk) 09:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. In the future this type of request (edit warring by one or two users) should go to WP:ANEW. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs keep trying to add inaccurate information for political reasons. VanIsaacWScont 12:53, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JNW (talk) 12:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Artoasis (talk) 04:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:37, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Speculation about leaving the club. RRD13 (talk) 07:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:11, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent IP vandalism. -- Ohc ¡digame! 15:43, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Vandalism was by just one IP, and the vandalism seems to have subsided. Orlady (talk) 20:31, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Living Person Articles

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism and BLP issues. Gimmeallyourmoney (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I looked at six or so of the articles, and they are all a single act of vandalism by the same (now blocked) IP. I will be checking the rest but I am sure they are the same. kelapstick(bainuu) 02:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs engaging in vandalism on this article. Although not extremely many of them are involved (currently three distinct IP-addresses, of which one has been blocked), it's getting somewhat tedious to revert every other minute. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 03:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd strongly appreciate if someone could get around to protecting the page. Of the past 50 edits, 49 were either vandalism or reverts of said vandalism. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 03:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. by another admin. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and dubious unsourced additions/changes to a BLP. STATic message me! 02:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:46, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 24 hour protection from IPs. User keep changing airdates with no clear explanation or sources. Appears to be trying to troll another user through the resubmission of this information. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war with someone who does not see the difference between a civil parish and an RC parish. The Banner talk 20:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question: I see you've moved the page. Has that resolved the issue? SlimVirgin (talk) 02:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, per lack of response. Re-file if necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: to allow Template Editors to edit. Steel1943 (talk) 03:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done SlimVirgin (talk) 03:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adabow (talk) 00:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SuperMarioMan ( talk ) 01:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Winnerex (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Continuing to soapbox and being used for trolling, pretty much what they were blocked for. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, they have an unblock request open; I'll leave it to the admin who decides that unless there's serious abuse in the meantime. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP's are changing the page(mainly pictures) recklessly, don't even bother themselves to take a look at the talk page, nor listening us from our edit summaries. By the way if you check the history of this page, you'll see that the page is overwhelmed by IP edits. KazekageTR (talk) 21:28, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly recreated also with Muklis Birotvi Mukhlis Birotvi as title, as a promotional article about a person with doubtful notability. SMS Talk 21:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, that looks like it's only going away if the user is blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:42, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced changes to article lead from several anon IP - no response to talk, requests for sources or discussion. . Lexlex (talk) 20:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:35, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Highly visible template - used in interface pages (MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext among others). Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, TE should be sufficient. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP content dispute / edit warring. TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, only one IP; report to ANI or ANEW. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Daily disruptive edits, test edits, and a touch of vandalism/WP:OR. – Recollected • 15:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, it's mostly one IP; if it's that much of a problem, report them to ANI. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:28, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject of the article is in the process of formation of a separate state. Mostly IPs are changing the status to state (mostly due to ignorance about the legal process). Please semi-protect the article for atleast 1 month. Amartyabag TALK2ME 13:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 09:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion, attacks by socks of Vgleer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 05:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

comment take this to SPI first as more important. They can block the range or what have you.Lihaas (talk) 07:23, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just coming from there. But they use open proxies. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 18:23, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and repeated blanking of content by IP's. It has been persistent for several years. Some DIFFS: [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Étienne Dolet (talk) 23:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the venue to solve content disputes. I'd suggest going to the talk page of the respective article if you believe that the IP's are right. As for these IP edits, they're nothing less than blanking of reliably sourced content and material without any sort of consideration towards the ongoing discussion at the talk page of the corresponding article. In addition to this, they are willing to edit-war over the content causing further disruption. Hence, this is nothing more than IP vandalism and should be treated as such. Étienne Dolet (talk) 01:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, ANI is better equippe to get to the bottom of the issue than this board is. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry by blocked user Carman12341. IPadPerson (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: WP:SPA 's keep adding information without proper reference that seems to contradict references (specifically that members of the band were all born in the capital city of Kabul, whereas WP:RS say that the members come from different regions of Afghanistan). Victor Victoria (talk) 20:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition erroneous figures, contrary to sources. SMS Talk 19:43, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Upon a quick check it looks like this year there have only been three vandalism revisions in 2014. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@kelapstick I didn't ask for protection due to vandalism. I find at least 12 edits in 2014 that defy WP:V (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12), one of the core content policies. And except for the first 2 or 3 all these edits are done in last 3 days. -- SMS Talk 21:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:136.223.3.130 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Take a look at what they just posted. Also can their most recent edit summaries be suppressed?. Shearonink (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that this school-IP's block took place during February (the shortest month of the year) so not sure how much longer the IP will be blocked. This might be the last day... but should they maybe receive an additional block now because of the foul language on their talk page ?(not sure where to request that). Shearonink (talk) 18:23, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Revisions revdeled. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:48, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect. Dynamic IP keeps making disruptive edits with edit summaries that are defamatory to living persons; page was semi-ed, but the disruption resumed after the protection was lifted. There is also a new edit summary that ought to be revdel-ed. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One bad edit in a week is not a basis for protection. Orlady (talk) 19:42, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

06 March 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent high rate of IP/new account vandalism. Article has a long protection history, most recently having been semi'd for 3 months, therefore an indefinite semi seems warranted here. Jinkinson talk to me 19:29, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:34, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For the bot:
Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP Vandalism, mainly the adding of Pro-Russian Maps that replace the Picture in the Infobox Calgaryivan (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - just gave it a aweek first off and see how we go. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For the bot:
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Abce2 (talk) 19:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone consider semi-protecting this indefinitely? It's a featured article, but there's a steady stream of unhelpful IP editing, including vandalism, because it's taught in schools. It's not a huge amount but it's regular. It's mostly people changing quotes and the way names are written, because there's more than one translation. Sometimes it's vandalism, such as today [18] and yesterday [19] (apparently the same person, and he's threatening to continue).

The last time I requested semi-protection, in January 2011, Casliber protected it indefinitely, but had an edit conflict with KrakatoaKatie, so it became a six-month protection instead. If anyone would consider restoring the indefinite, or adding a long-term protection, that would be very helpful. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:32, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musdan77 (talk) 19:08, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Use the talk page, please. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Shraddha Kapoor (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Smauritius. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:31, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Repeated edits of template by autoconfirmed users trying to create an article or making test edits. APerson (talk!) 18:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Hoax article: see also Cesar Yedra, César Yedra. Ruby Murray 14:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected and User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. It seems to be under protection until June but is still editable by IPs. Anna (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, it's protected from moves until June; the editing protection was only for 12 hours. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:07, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Cirt (talk) 18:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: WP:CRYSTAL vios by ips . Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yunshui.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – appears to be todays Google Doodle, so is getting high levels of Vandalism. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, it'll die down in a few hours if it's the Google Doodle causing the attention; we should avoid protecting temporarily high-profile articles if we can. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:06, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's why the request was for temporary protection. What a stupid decision. If you're so keen on leaving it unprotected, why don't YOU monitor the article yourself and undo all the vandalism instead of expecting everyone else to? Richard75 (talk) 16:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We have a stream on vandalism all day. Semi-protection is to avoid having to undo such edits every five minutes. Protect it just for today and tomorrow. That should be enough. Anna (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Compromise:
Pending-changes protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Richard75 (talk) 17:29, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP's changing the ticketing and income information back and forth. Gloss • talk 14:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: This redirect is mentioned repeatedly in a page move request (that is going nowhere BTW) at Talk:Cyprus. Most people seem to think it should redirect not to Cyprus (the country's article) but to Geography of Cyprus (see Cuba (island) for example). If this is going to change it really should be discussed at WP:RFD, so in the meantime could you protect it, please? You probably want to read the discussion at Talk:Cyprus first... Red Slash 03:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It was changed to the current version on 3 March. Today is the 5 March and nobody has made an attempt to change it back. If there is an edit war over the redirect then it can be protected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection until March 17, 2014: I will be taking a WikiBreak shortly (see here), and I won't be around to clean up Wikipedia, let alone my talk page, for a while. Therefore I request semi-protection on my userpage until March 17 to prevent vandals from taking advantage of my absence to destroy my userpages. K6ka (talk | contribs) 13:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 11 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User pages can be semiprotected on request. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of sourced content and introduction of unsourced content; probably connected contributor, using multiple accounts (one IP, one new username). Dwpaul Talk 04:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 06:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: from IP hopper. Anna (talk) 01:43, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like the blocked one is from Texas, the other the UK, the unblocked one has "apologized" and not done anything since then. Feel free to post below if they kick up again. kelapstick(bainuu) 01:56, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Following on from this SPI, various IPs have now taken up the sockpuppets' cause, vandalising the page with NPOV edits and ignoring the talk page consensus. Tiller54 (talk) 22:30, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 06:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of nonsensical or unsourced content by IPs. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP was blocked, in any case it should have been a semiprotection request as it was by an IP. kelapstick(bainuu) 00:56, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 23:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 01:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent inclusion of content by two editors who are working together. I am being driven mad by users Joedini123 and NickCushion, who are systematically adding reviews to The Walking Dead articles from a non-notable website and are repeatedly reverting edits by User:Drovethrughosts and myself. I believe warnings have been placed on both of their talk pages, but edits have continued. Can other actions be taken? Thank you for your consideration. Another Believer (Talk)

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:33, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

07 March 2014

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes privilege on a BLP. STATic message me! 19:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 20:44, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until the highly controversial referendum is over, article should be for auto-confirmed users only. Will be a major target of vandalism and POV pushing, and already is. Львівське (говорити) 15:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. Come back of problems resume. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: - Defamating of a living person. Some facts in this article are erroneous and are now being used in intellectual discussions around the world to oppose the thinking of S.N. Balagangadhara. S.N.Balagangadhara is a living person and he wishes for an honest intellectual discussion based on true facts, therefore he would like to manage the content of his biography himself.Pzwertva (talk) 14:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I don't think you understand what full protections is. You might have better luck asking for help at WP:BLPN. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism. Hafspajen (talk) 13:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article has been repeatedly blanked by 88.104.31.21, an apparent vandal. I requested an administrator intervene here, but the vandal remains active. Hoping someone here can help put an end to the revert war. Thanks, Citobun (talk) 10:21, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the IP is removing unsourced information (as stated in their edit summaries!); they're clearly not a vandal. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and dubious unsourced additions to a BLP returns immediately following the end of the protection period. STATic message me! 03:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There's been 3 cases of very minor vandalism and test edits and the like. No overt BLP violations, etc. Jayron32 03:44, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Jayron32: Minor vandalism? "also known simply as Cockface arselicker!", "They, were much in love and i cant wait to see him", "Williams' great, great Grandfather help create chicken and waffles", unexplained removal of heading, "Pharrell,or also known as "smokey the bear" as is alter persona due to the hat he is sometimes seen with at many events including basketball games,". If this is not vandalism worth protecting from on a Biography of a Living Person, I do not know what is. STATic message me! 16:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 16:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Consistent back and forth on specific names of characters by IP based editors. Zero Serenity (talk) 14:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:48, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Protection: Hi please remove protection from Template:Latest stable software release/Invision Power Board because it is no longer being vandalised. 90.204.133.243 (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected It's no longer being vandalised because it's protected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ok but it was last edited last July by a user. It is also a low Visable page or it would have had more edits since last July by a user. 90.204.133.243 (talk) 20:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
please can you remove the protection temporarily too see if it will still be vandalised when unprotected. 90.204.133.243 (talk) 08:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for one year: Page is a target of persistent IP vandalism; I've never seen a productive IP edit.--Jim in GeorgiaContribsTalk 14:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – To avoid edit war. Please refer the talk page and history for more details. ShriramTalk 13:57, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated POV pushing of erroneous information, reverting sourced information by IP users. Silvrous Talk 13:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:38, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Article has a history of POV advertorial edits by obviously COI editors over the entire history of the page - more than a year. Several months might go by between edits but when they happen it changes the article into a blatant advert. Thus I believe indefinite pending changes protection would be the most suitable for this situation. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:48, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes - subject to ongoing childish vandalism. Seems to have plenty of watchers (given the speed with which vandalism is reverted) so pending changes should deter some of the silliness while ensuring good editing continues. Stalwart111 23:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:15, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. STATic message me! 03:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:136.223.3.130 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – School-IP repeating a previous behavior - using own talk page to post inappropriate and vaguely-threatening content while blocked. Shearonink (talk) 21:31, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:37, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP disruption related to her connection to the identity reveal of Satoshi Nakamoto. GregChant (talk) 16:29, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, not much disruption, and at least one IP is making what seem to be good-faith edits, even if they are the subject of a dispute. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. K6ka (talk | contribs) 22:07, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request one month of protection. At least 9 instances of vandalism by multiple IP editors in the last 30 days. LT910001 (talk) 20:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:56, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spam from IPs. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#standardmarketingltd.co.uk for more details. . Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 20:27, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

08 March 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: This is a request to have my own user page and user talk page semi-protected. Thank you. Kaldari (talk) 20:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for the user page. The talk page was protected before my arrival. --j⚛e deckertalk 21:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – An IP-user (or logged-out user) tries to implement unsourced info about his religion, multiple request to source this failed, IP edit-warring to keep this in. Denniss (talk) 20:15, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 20:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I've changed this to indefinite, as it's a long-term issue and it has already been protected twice for one year. SlimVirgin (talk) 20:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: Article for a Bollywood movie being released today. Promotional vandalism from possible sock-puppets vvarkey (talk) 17:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism, unexplained removal of sourced content and dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 17:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for one week, but note that it won't help with one of the accounts. SlimVirgin (talk) 20:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Belle Knox (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated BLP violations by IP users. There are several warnings on the page and despite that, people are trying to get around the protection on the main page by re-adding it on the talk page. I'm loathe to request this for talk pages, but the reasons for naming her really seem to be more as a way to harass her online. (Justifications include "we have to give her real name or she's just another porn star".) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • One IP has already been blocked because after I kept deleting his attempts to re-add the info, he began making personal attacks. I honestly think that this sort of thing will continue. On a side note, if the opinion is to delete then I'm going to request that the page be salted to avoid any attempts to re-create the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:47, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring over the last 2 days from an ip-hopper. The problem isn't terribly widespread, so two weeks protection may encourage him to move on.   — Jess· Δ♥ 13:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 5 days by Bbb23. Thanks.   — Jess· Δ♥ 15:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 17:47, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandal with dynamic IP. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 08:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Favonian (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 month). tutterMouse (talk) 09:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. --Jakob (talk) 23:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 02:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP violations. There is news that this baseball pitcher is about to sign for the Arizona Diamondbacks but it's not fully 100% confirmed yet. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 22:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. CFCF (talk · contribs · email) 17:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 02:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

09 March 2014

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing. This free agent is nearing a deal for either the Blue Jays or the Orioles but we don't know which team he might choose yet. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 14:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, one of the editors adding the information is autoconfirmed, semiprotection will have no effect. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – please look at ip geolocation [[20]] and then compare to sockmaster and indef block user edit here [[21]]. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 15:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandal with dynamic IP. Chunk5Darth (talk) 07:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:33, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
HJ Mitchell, there has been another vandal edit from a new IP after your decline notice. This makes five in less than half a day. Please reconsider. Chunk5Darth (talk) 15:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection for 1-2 weeks. Slow multi-point edit war in a chronically contentious article. JFW | T@lk 17:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Vandalism. Nothing but it every time protection is lifted. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated dynamic IP vandalism. Suspected by disgruntled former employee (judging on IP location). Unfounded allegations of bias. Malicious edits also made to linked pages. Only1weasel (talk) 10:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism Magentic Manifestations (talk) 08:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, looks like a content dispute HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting semi protection of something in my userspace. Hot Stop talk-contribs 07:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, what for? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection requested. Looks like an active edit-war, which may be degenerating into something worse. [22]. Nsk92 (talk) 04:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, best left to those familair with the issues. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two users blanked a section of the page without a summary. This happened yesterday and today. IPadPerson (talk) 11:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 06:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current event. Qantasplanes (talk) 05:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of opinionated comments (conspiracy, didn't happen etc)... Qantasplanes (talk) 05:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In light of what is going on right now, please protect it. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Continuing to monitor page... — JamesR (talk) 06:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is a high level of current edit-warring by non-autoconfirmed users. Hack (talk) 20:23, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, there is a high edit rate, but the disruption is not huge. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:06, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

semi protection a long term dynamic IP insisting on including information that cannot be verified by any source - a specific release date for a film that has not been released. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:DangerousPanda (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:45, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Salvio. Diannaa (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two veteran editors, who should know better, are edit warring over content. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MilborneOne.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Missing template: The page is already protected but it doesn't have the template showing. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 14:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the template. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:13, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Other editors edit warring as well. Because this has gone on for over a month, request three-month semi-protection. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, per Kelapstick. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated insertion of speculative edits and blanking of sections of article without explanation by IP editors, along with uncivil behavior by one IP toward anyone reverting his edits. Creativity-II (talk) 09:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 09:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs keep inserting unsourced (and unlikely) statements about Majorana's dissapearance due to 'Ninjas'. — HHHIPPO 08:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandal with dynamic IP. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 06:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This has been protected before and now that it is unprotected weird stuff are appearing again, some of it BLP violations. One or more IPs change the pronoums of part of the article, claiming that the LP has identified as transgender. Don't think we have sources for that. Another editor added ", incorporating elements of the author's batshit insanity (to use the scientific term for it)." It can be difficult to know which edits are vandalism/BLP violations since many of us don't know anything about the cartoon or author. Iselilja (talk) 00:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Subject of off-wiki canvassing here. VQuakr (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:25, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism, dubious unsourced additions and genre warring (the major issue) by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 20:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent IPs blanking the plot section, against WP:SPOILER because they "want a spoiler free page.". Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent adding of unsourced content by IPs/edit warring Littlecarmen (talk) 17:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection IP vandalism. Frietjes (talk) 17:17, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Disruptive editing The same IP whose address changes every time he/she edits, inserts unsupported non-existent certifications for various markets.--Harout72 (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism (7 instances since the beginning of March) by IPs. meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – ip socks of Smauritius. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Range of IP's from the same location keep reordering cast based on preference over existing guidelines. Multiple warnings have been given and completely ignored. DWB (talk) / Comment on Dishonored's FA nom! 14:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Continuous changing of the characters' roles without any official sources and citations. - DecepticonsFTW (talk) 13:29, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Different IP's keep replacing Sport Club with Gremio, despite the source not mentioning Gremio. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 11:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:10, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent IP hopping vandal. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Periodic IP vandalism — Myasuda (talk) 03:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous changing of tour dates and locations and number of shows. Complete mayhem. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 03:35, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Persistent vandalism from several users. Vieque (talk) 02:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

semi protection long term or even indefinite semi-proection, a blocked user who already tried many different accounts (see this) is using dynamic IP to include unsourced information to the page. Mohsen1248 (talk) 01:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High recent level of IP vandalism. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a "high level of IP vandalism". it is one user, User:Lugnuts, repeatedly adding an unsourced category, and having made that edit 7 times in the last 2 days [23]. 41.133.0.152 (talk) 09:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the history log. Yourself and another IP user constantly removing info, despite sourcing, and being reverted by other users, such as User:Deb. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although technically I'm "involved", I think it is obvious this needs to be done to prevent edit-warring.

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Deb (talk) 11:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: - IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One IP, you have an AIV report on it, and the IP hasn't edited since your warning. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Long history of persistent vandalism. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 23:01, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of IP disruption (some good faith) about this person being on life-support after an accident. QED237 (talk) 22:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:45, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP's are changing the page(mainly pictures) recklessly, don't even bother themselves to take a look at the talk page, nor listening us from our edit summaries. By the way if you check the history of this page, you'll see that the page is overwhelmed by IP edits. Last time admin declined my request and told me to do 'dispute resolution' steps. But they do not cooperate they dont even take a look at the talk page. I am tired of reveting their edits all the time. KazekageTR (talk) 21:25, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant removal of AfD template, now by multiple IPs. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. the two IPs in question have been blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:10, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hi, requesting 24 hour protection from IPs. New Zealand-based IPs are trying to muck up the article by restoring to an old, and entirely unsourced version. They are not participating in the talk page discussion, reverting instead, and they're trolling me on my talk page. 118.92.45.210 and 118.92.41.133 are the IPs. Protection request is intended to dissuade. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. It seems to have stopped but please ask again if it resumes. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected: High level of IP vandalism. Content disputes. False Information Provided - No Citation/Reference. Joe Parkinson (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some kind of IP hopping or co-operative childish editing is going on - can we get this article a break please? Thanks. DBaK (talk) 22:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (done by Discospinster) kelapstick(bainuu) 23:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive edits, vandalism, and addition of original research. – Recollected • 22:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very short full protection: This is being discussed at WP:DRN, where I am a volunteer (Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Unite Against Fascism). A very short page protection (I am thinking a day or two) would give everyone a chance to calm down and stop reverting each other while we try to resolve the edit conflict. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now because it hasn't been edited for nearly 24 hours, but please ask again if the reverting resumes (either here or you can ping me on my talk page). SlimVirgin (talk) 20:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10 March 2014

Semi-protection: Long term high level of IP vandalism due to being subject of internet meme. Article has been semi protected previously and was recently "pending changes". This expired yesterday and within 20 minutes IPs started changing every instance of 'dog' to 'doge'. SagaciousPhil - Chat 09:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi protection was lifted a few days ago and the page is already sparking back up with vandal IPs. . Gloss • talk 02:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Reference desk (edit | project page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi to fend off harassment-only IP trolls. Admin advised me to delete the troll's garbage on-sight, and the IP is now edit-warring to keep his garbage visible. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 22:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball Bugs is repeatedly removing my reply to The Rambling Man. I should be able to interact with the editor. BB on the other hand, has an interaction ban in effect with TRM (here) and should not be interfering with the discussion. 54.213.95.118 (talk) 23:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for posting the interaction ban, as it makes clear that my reverting your trolling does not fall within the boundaries of it. Now if YOU and I were interaction banned, that would be a different story. But we're not. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 02:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As noted on that page, 54's personal attacks are subject to deletion on-sight, and he's also using an inappropriate entry point (you'll have to ask the admin exactly what that last part is technically about). ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 23:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What admin? That would be helpful to note. meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 23:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
On the ref desk talk page, Bishonen restates what KWW told him about the illegitimate use of that 54 series, and Bishonen states his opinion that 54's trolling is subject to deletion on-sight. 54 also violated 3RR in that talk page edit-war. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 54.213.95.118 (talk · contribs). for three days. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for blocking. Just be aware that he's an IP-hopper. That's why I wanted the page itself protected for a while. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The page was indefinitely semi-protected before the full protection and now that the full protection has ended vandalism has returned as would be expected. STATic message me! 06:38, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:Second request - Repeated dynamic IP vandalism. Suspected by disgruntled former employee (judging on IP location). Unfounded allegations of bias. Malicious edits also made to linked pages. Have had to request this again as the first request was declined and the edits have been reapplied.Only1weasel (talk) 22:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As Kelapstick said not 12 hours ago. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – I realize this isn't in Template or Module space, but it is defined as a template, so I think it still qualifies... I have an edit request, and another user has an edit request, and I could quickly fulfil both if it was lowered to  Template editor. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 23:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. First, Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) is still active; second, this is much higher-profile than most of the recent requests, so I'd prefer there to be a discussion first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current major sports event with a lot of IP disruption adding scores of matches not yet played and so on. QED237 (talk) 00:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, as well as related pages, including Jon Jafari, Egoraptor, and Ninja Sex Party. ZoidXsa (talk) 22:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of disruption with editors adding score until matches are over. QED237 (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continue to add unsourced information claiming the series is based on a French show, but no proof has been found. Numerous editors have been reverting these edits. Logical Fuzz (talk) 17:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection for one week. There has been a spate of "death entries" on the page with no news on web to support his death. Most of the edits were IPs; one registered user joined in.--Jim in GeorgiaContribsTalk 16:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. The date of his death has been announced on a website that appears to have been his. Please ask again if you're arguing that this is not a good-enough source. SlimVirgin (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I understand, but something smells about this event. The Philadelphia ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC affiliate web pages are silent about this. I asked for verification on the NBC affiliate's FB page (yeah, social media) and got no answer. Guarnere's webpage contains only the notice -- no history of his accomplishments. This is not the first time his death has been reported (see July 2013). Please keep this in the pending list for now. Thanks.--Jim in GeorgiaContribsTalk 18:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Disregard. It showed up on the NBC affiliate page.--Jim in GeorgiaContribsTalk 18:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Minutes after protection expired, the vandals struck again. –HTD 16:25, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – I can't think of any reason for this redirect (Link: Template:TL) to be fully protected and I would like to preform a null edit on it to clear it from an erroneous category per an edit request. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 22:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did the null edit, which has solved the immediate categorization problem, would you still like this unprotected? --j⚛e deckertalk 04:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. No particular need; re-request if you really want it unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Template protection is the norm now for Fully protected templates. It should be reduced to Template Protection. Also note of no mention to have it unprotected.—cyberpower ChatOnline 18:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Meh. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:45, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To perform the edit request to improve performance. Protection level on this should have been lowered to  Template editor when the batch of other similar templates was done (the Ln line of templates). Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 23:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected by administrator Salix alba.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To perform the edit request to improve performance. Protection level on this should have been lowered to  Template editor when the batch of other similar templates was done (the Ln line of templates). Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 23:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Or, if you appreciate irony,  Done! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Just realized this isn't protected... With it's high visibility on all of the RFP pages, it probably should be. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 22:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. No real need for more than semi—it's not that widely used. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

11 March 2014

  • Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism of article by unregistered users and one registered user over the past one to 1½ months, involving repeated inserts of references to people (namely Lesterlyn Babor and Janella Salvador) with absolutely no relevance to the article. TVtonightOKC (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. "My master, Annatar the Great, bids thee welcome!" 16:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One VOA blocked, other IP is pretty benign. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, preventative measures. Jds784 (talk) 14:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Used by template-protected Template:Location map~. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP (hopper?) is repeatedly adding unsourced info from various IPs. Matty.007 19:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:47, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant additions of unsourced content without discussion. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:41, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:44, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Non-stop vandalism from a dynamic IP over the past couple of days. Chunk5Darth (talk) 18:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of death related info without a source while I am unable to verify it on my own also. SMS Talk 18:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:33, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute/Edit warring, not sure about the level of protection but the edit war is going on for a week between an IP editor (using a dynamic IP) and 1-2 other editors. SMS Talk 17:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: My personal userpage has been experiencing a high level of IP vandalism. I need my page to be semi-protected, as much of the vandalism is inflamatory and abusive in nature. BrayLockBoy (talk) 16:41, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 16:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism by tagteam DVdm (talk) 15:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The usual Balkan sockpuppetry... bobrayner (talk) 14:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, as well as related pages, including Jon Jafari and Ninja Sex Party. ZoidXsa (talk) 11:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced information. Not as bad as before, but still needs to stop. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 06:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Eric Corbett 22:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism by various 'new' users DVdm (talk) 14:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Same as below. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism by shifting ips and new users DVdm (talk) 14:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully a week's worth of protection makes them lose interest. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing vandalism by user:35.2.162.117. Ad Orientem (talk) 06:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Let's see if they come back. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 09:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for two reasons. (1) The protecting admin is currently still active so you should contact them before coming here and (2) you haven't provided a reason anyway. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Ongoing 4chan raid, see http://archive.foolz.us/v/thread/235088536/#235102021 for more information. Spike in vandal edits within the past 24 hours. This edit and this edit are both subtle vandalism edits: If you look at the "O" within the modified image, you can see the face from the front cover of The Mystery of the Druids inserted into it. File:MGSV Ground Zeroes boxart.jpg is the non-vandal image. --benlisquareT•C•E 10:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Closedmouth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (3 days) tutterMouse (talk) 11:24, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from anonymous editors via multiple IP addresses. JD Lambert(T|C) 06:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Generic template-editor restriction-lowering rationale. meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 08:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:72.201.218.164 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – User continues to spam their talk page with nonsense while they're blocked, removing warnings/block notification. – Recollected • 05:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Materialscientist (talk) 05:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – PeterSymonds protected as High-risk template, probably should be set to TE. Mlpearc (open channel) 01:06, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined as I don't think it's used widely enough to warrant TE protection (my standards are higher than with transcluded templates as it's only going to affect a few templates, if that, before it's found and reverted. I am, however, open to another admin TE protecting if you disagree. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:10, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think I've seen this one used more than any other welcome template, TBH, but that's not my call. Mlpearc (open channel) 02:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Apparently unwatched featured article. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 21:31, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal who has a long history of vandalism elsewhere, and clearly has a very dynamic IP. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 22:56, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 198.228.217.150 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo.. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – please see Leonard Leopard . Hell in a Bucket (talk) 21:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined 2007 then 2014 isn't enough to justify salting for me. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jamesx12345 07:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Warring sock IPs. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 05:18, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's not clear who the IP is a sock of, nor do they seem to be doing it that often. Try opening a discussion on the talk page as to why there is a requirement for three climate tables. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 00:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Doesn't look like PC or unprotection is going to work so taking it back to the indef semi. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Aggressive vandalism by 35.2.162.117. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see that they made a series of edits one after another but it was all in one 17 minute period. Wait and see if they return. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, perennial target. Sportfan5000 (talk) 03:56, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:09, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP hopper edit warring. Jojalozzo 22:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see how this looks in, say, 12 or 24 hours, so I'll leave it up until then. Any admin override me if you want, especially if the situation gets worse while I'm AFK. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Appears to have stopped for now. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 21:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – It's slow burning, but there is a whole bunch of sock edits every few days or so. Requesting PC to limit this. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 22:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: High level of disruptive editing. Article attracts much attention and will do so for the next days too. FonEengIneeR7 talk 20:44, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too much activity for pending changes, and it does need to be protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:24, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This article receives regular IP vandalism which I expect to see increase as the holiday approaches. I ask for protection at least until March 18 when the holiday is over though I would prefer long-term pending changes. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Regurlarly disruptive changed by IPs wanting different countries on top of the list. QED237 (talk) 17:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after protection expired. –HTD 16:47, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:08, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last protect of many, a 6 month one, expired March 5 and vandalism immediately resumed. . Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – We probably need a fairly lengthy temporary PC here: the IP-hopping anon has been persistent in their unexplained removals. Same applies to Brahmin, Sanadhya Brahmin‎, Bengali Brahmins and Saryupareen Brahmins . Sitush (talk) 12:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I didn't do Sanadhya Brahmin as that appears to be protected already. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:50, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: The list sorting by English and Nihongo is being disputed. Someone disregarded the official decision in English. Raymond "Giggs" Ko 06:45, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The article hasn't been edited in over two days. Please ask again if problems resume. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:136.223.3.130 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Individuals are continuing to use this School IP's talk-page to post inane/rude/vulgar posts that have nothing to do with improving the encyclopedia and are also not requests for unblocking. Shearonink (talk) 18:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: POV editing repeated addition of "Labour brokering is pimping" by IP hopper. (As well as attacks on user talk pages) Jim1138 (talk) 09:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Since the IPs are vandalizing multiple articles and talk pages it is probably best to handle with blocks. Two are currently blocked, if another kicks up take it to AIV, perhaps a range block will solve it. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A case is pending review here and its the second time that an IP sock of this user has removed the case status template to get it off Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cases/Overview. -- . SMS Talk 09:21, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 nights, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing 4chan raid, see http://archive.foolz.us/v/thread/234959706/ for original discussion thread. Recent spike in vandal edits, in addition to the page having long-term vandalism since 2013. --benlisquareT•C•E 08:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7, 24 hour periods, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, edit warring & is a perennial target. --ANKMALI (talk) 06:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 long days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I would also suggest that you and Amanraj6 (talk · contribs) open a discussion on the talk page to deal with the edit warring between the two of you. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – active mobile range User:Orestes1984 is evading his block. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 20:50, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: On users own userspace. (t) Josve05a (c) 20:45, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mark Arsten. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Similar templates such as {{US-airport-ga}} have been lowered to  Template editor and now there has been the same edit request that was on {{US-airport-ga}} on this template, which I would like to be able to fulfill when the user responds, and based on the previous discussion, they will respond... — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

12 March 2014

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Jakob (talk) 18:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:11, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Disruption created by various accounts (one of them appears to be a newly created wp:spa [[25]]). Editors have been invited to participate in the talkpage but until now they avoid participation and continue to perform massive unexplained edits (removals of sourced content etc). A full protection of ca. 1 week might convince all parts that participation in the talkpage is necessary.Alexikoua (talk) 12:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Its a BLP article and dynamic IP editor is doing disruptive edits. Ialready have reverted him thrice in last 24 hours. SMS Talk 05:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for two weeks, but the BLP needs to be sourced; there are currently only a few links at the end. SlimVirgin (talk) 18:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting long-term protection from IPs. IP users in particular continue to submit unsourced series end dates. This is frustrating because WikiProject Television only considers a source ended if an official cancellation has been announced, which is rare for animated series. So the fans are sure the series has ended, and that's likely true, but the rules prevent the inclusion of this information without a source, and folks like me are stuck trying to defend the rules from the frequent submission of these end dates by passersby. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Trying one month first, rather than going straight to indefinite. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protection: I am working to clean up the {{error}}s that this template is transcluding. Over 1,500 pages in file namespace are transcluding errors. I've been using AutoWikiBrowser to work through these, but see template talk:Non-free use rationale logo for discussion of the issues that make the rest more difficult. I have a new version in the Template:Non-free use rationale logo/sandbox which I've verified with Template:Non-free use rationale logo/testcases. I have created three new maintenance categories for AWB to latch onto for easier fixing of more specific error types, which I'll leave as red-links for now. Perhaps once cleaned up, consolidating these into a single maintenance cat will make more sense. So this update may be temporary, which is why I'm asking for lowered protection so that I can tweak it as needed, without needing to submit multiple protected edit requests. Thanks, Wbm1058 (talk) 18:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done SlimVirgin (talk) 19:12, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:23, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 15:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent full protection. I had previously requested that this template be reduced to "Template protection" (the request was fulfilled), but I was not aware that the template is cascade-protected. Might as well leave the protection level as full. Steel1943 (talk) 07:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done (there is no {{RFPP|meh}} :P) — meh... doesn't really matter. If it ever gets removed from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items, this seems a reasonable fallback. Either way, the full outweighs template-editor, so it's moot. :P --slakr\ talk / 12:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Slakr, I protected it before I saw your comment. It's included on cascade-protected items with a number of templates so isn't likely to be removed. Really the only reason to make it full is so the protection icon is correct. I'm happy to change it back to template editor if you'd like. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Callanecc: So totally no prob; doesn't matter either way... that was my point; yours is fine, too. :P Basically I just wanted a way to say "yeah, saw this, but me personally doing anything more isn't gonna matter, but I couldn't care less either way." :P --slakr\ talk / 12:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user is edit warring and persistently adding unsourced and potentially controversial material to this BLP. User has been repeatedly warned. I am unable to remove most recent addition of material due to three edit rule. Ad Orientem (talk) 07:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, since it's only one IP, but blocking 76.88.142.84 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) may be appropriate if he continues to edit war (I've dropped a warning on their talk page), and protection may be called for if their IP starts to change. --slakr\ talk / 11:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent editing (promotional and otherwise) by sockpuppets of the indefinitely blocked User:Beleiutz. Psychonaut (talk) 11:07, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:11, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism--7 revisions by IPs genre warring within 24 hours. Dan56 (talk) 09:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:10, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request in own userspace. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:00, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request in own userspace. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:00, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism edits by different IPs over the last 48 hours. Ad Orientem (talk) 07:15, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --slakr\ talk / 11:39, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs and new accounts vandalizing article in last few hours. Meters (talk) 05:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --slakr\ talk / 11:33, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes. Vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 03:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pending changes protection should not be used on pages with a high edit rate. Not enough for semi, but I've blocked the most recent edit warring IP. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:25, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for multiple items

Semi-protection: I ask for protection for these items for a month. Ips Some references added and placed information without speculative information without adding any reference, only based on a gossip blog which is not a reliable source, at least ask you to protect pur one month. It's annoying to have to check all the time what each IP sets. I ask you to protect it stops adding speculative information. Thank you.--GeorgeMilan (Talk) 20:29, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The users adding the unsourced content are autoconfirmed so full protection would be the only option, and it this stage I don't think it's warranted. My suggestion is that you warn them then report to WP:AIV or WP:ANI and ask that they be blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:29, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I want people to discuss their thoughts on the talk page instead of edit-warring about whether something's promotional. 5 different people, IPs and registered users. meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 04:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruption from several users. Vieque (talk • ctb) 03:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:42, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP's back inserting trivia, against TP consensus and guidelines. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 01:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:42, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP's back inserting trivia, against TP consensus and guidelines. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 01:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 01:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:39, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:23, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits, vandalism, original research. – Recollected • 23:38, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:36, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – History of IP vandalism on the article, but has gotten worse since early February. — Maile (talk) 23:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:35, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism, dubious unsourced additions and genre warring by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 23:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection. Hi I written here about a week ago but I assume you carnt write in the archive so I am writing it again. Please could someone unprotect the template it is no longer needed because since 2 years ago when someone protected the template not a lot of user have been editing it and could we trial unprotecting the template for a month to see if it will still be vandalised 94.7.128.0 (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected It only has one transclusion so I'm comfortable trying unprotection since the protecting admin hasn't yet responded to the query on their talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:21, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Every recent edit is undone by another user who mistakenly cites "WP:OR" and it's getting out of hand. User talk: AGAR2EM1 21:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have just blocked this editor for repeatedly inserting patent nonsense into the article. Thus, there is no longer any need for protection. SpinningSpark 21:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. by Spinningspark (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits. SMS Talk 17:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent and crude vandalism by new users. DaHuzyBru (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also User(s) blocked.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 22:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every recent edit is either IP vandalism or a revert of IP vandalism. Jinkinson talk to me 21:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since I've seen this happen so many times before, I have to ask: why do people semi-protect and PC-protect the same page at the same time? Wouldn't it just make more sense to apply the semi for a fortnight and then apply the PC? Jinkinson talk to me 22:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well there's no way to set the PC to start at a certain time, and in a fortnight I will have forgotten all about this. Short-term semi and long-term PC is much more desirable than long-term semi, so it makes sense to enable both at the same time, even if the PC is redundant until the semi expires. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page has had repeated derogatory edits by unregistered user (162.239.236.97), with reversions done by 3 separate editors... having to do it again and again just gets old... Page content is pretty well set in stone, as its subject is now history... GWFrog (talk) 17:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, report the IP to WP:ANEW or WP:ANI; semi is only appropriate for disruption from multiple editors. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:24, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Mdann52talk to me! 15:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, relativley mild for TFA, and it'll all be over in just under six hours (much to the relief of the aticle's authors, I'm sure). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Already semi-protected, but the problem isn't IPs, it's us Registered Users. There has been no fresh information for several hours, but there has been a large number of edits, essentially consisting of Users undoing each other in squabbling and bickering over sentences, phrases, words and even upper-versus-lower-case on individual words. YSSYguy (talk) 13:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, that's par for the course on such a high-profile article; it would be have to be really bad to jsutify shutting everyone out of an article on an unfolding event. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently died, please protect. JMHamo (talk) 10:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced additions and speculation to a BLP. STATic message me! 21:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:58, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An anon has decided to imply page ownership and has started to remove content such as British programming dates and "old" references without explanation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:10, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: 183.82.52.109 Resorting the deletion template, please provide semi-protection to Wisdom IT Services India Pvt Ltd so that unregistered users can not make any further changes. WOWIndian Talk 13:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This does not need protection though, the removal of the PROD template means it's contested and if you mean to get it deleted then you'll have to goto AFD and nominate it there. tutterMouse (talk) 13:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, per TutterMouse (talk · contribs). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

13 March 2014

Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 21:03, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Only needed to keep attribution after pseudo-move. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: To match Template:Location map Croatia which it is replacing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: To match Template:Location map Belgium, which it is replacing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increased vandalism over the past days. Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP problems. Gloss • talk 19:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent protection: And throw away the key. Single disruptive user has been IP hopping for months. JNW (talk) 18:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Diannaa.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Temporary) reduction in protection to template editor: I would like to fix some errors as discussed on the talk page for the template. Frietjes (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lectonar (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over the long term. JNW (talk) 16:20, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Addition of poorly sourced content and some amount of minor vandalism. Kanga Roo in the Zoo (talk) 14:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:Crystal Violations . Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: This page shares the same name as Belle Knox's purported birth name, and it has the potential for abuse of the BLP rules. Since we have repeatedly tried to prevent this from occurring on both the real and talk page, as well as respecting her wishes not to be known by any other name, leaving this page unprotected for now leaves open the possibility of abuse in the coming weeks. If Know confirms that this is indeed her birth name and is open to having this name associated with her, then we can reconsider salting this page. Tokyogirl79 would also be someone to talk to about this, as she has started an RFC on the talk page that is trending towards keeping her real name off of the site as well. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 13:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Tokyogirl79.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Hamedog (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:00, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Formatted your request (or at least gave a header, no actual reason was given) but I'm curious why the talkpage of a user that's been inactive since 2011 needs unprotecting. tutterMouse (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Addition of poorly sourced content. Same old, same old here, just these free agents in the NFL. This one recently signed a 5-year deal for the New York Jets. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 11:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:00, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow edit warring. SMS Talk 11:12, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes. Herald talk with me 16:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pending changes protection should not be used on pages with a high edit rate. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Council on American–Islamic Relations (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP-hopping vandal has repeatedly targeted this page and others; can we just protect it to spare everyone else the trouble of dealing with this nastiness again and again?. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:07, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Talk pages are protected very sparingly when blocking is no longer an option, as there is no current abuse protection isn't warranted. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nothing more than vandalism in the past few months. ZappaOMati 00:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's not at a level where PC isn't working so there's no reason to change the protection without asking the protecting admin. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Extend pc time or upgrade to semi-protection? The protection admin. is not active at this time. --Gh87 in the public computer (talk) 21:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It hasn't been edited in more than 2 weeks so looks like PC has done it's job and can not expire. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is continuously vandalized by IPs and new accounts, had been temporarily protected but the vandalism continues. Zayeem (talk) 17:54, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:28, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Since Crimea's declaration of intention to separate from Ukraine 48 hours ago, there has been edit-warring among both registered and non-registered users over whether it belongs on this list or not. This has happened in spite of reiterated calls for discussing edits in the talk page. Result is that now Crimea has been added as two separate entries (which is something completely against the purposes of the page). Requesting that the page be protected in order to force editors to discuss edits on talk page. Ladril (talk) 16:00, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Same situation on List of sovereign states. TDL (talk) 17:15, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And on Template:States with limited recognition and Gallery of sovereign state flags, though to a lesser extent. SiBr4 (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
At this point I do not feel full protection is needed. Now that the sources have come clear on the matter I am seeing more along the lines of IP and new registered editor edits. I would change the request to Semi-protection - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. List of states with limited recognition is the only one I think needs to be protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 06:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. This player who previously played for the Miami Dolphins was recently traded to the San Francisco 49ers. I don't know if this has to do with him in the aftermath of a bullying scandal or something. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:30, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing. This football signed a 6-year deal for the Denver Broncos. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing. This football player signed a 5-year deal for the New Orleans Saints. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Herald talk with me 14:42, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated deletion of picture strongly related to the article. Page protection until consensus is found and decision is made on picture in question.--Catflap08 (talk) 13:07, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruption. There is news that this pitcher who is a free agent is about to sign a 1-year deal for the Atlanta Braves. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 12:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 941 transclusions (I'm guessing the cut-off is generally ~500 for semi, ~4000 for template-ed). Just a pre-emptive guess. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 02:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Mine is generally quite a bit lower than that. Around 50 for semi, around 500-1000 for template editor, and 100,000-500,000 for sysop and/or WP:Cascade-protected items. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Per request on my talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: PC isn't holding off frequent vandalism and reverts. --Gh87 in the public computer (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. FYI Mifter. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing. This NFL player has recently signed a 5-year deal for the Detroit Lions. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 20:55, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ware has recently signed a 3-year deal for the Broncos and a lot of Cowboys fans are going after this just to mourn his departure. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 20:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Third request for PP. Multiple vandalism edits by different IPs over the last 48 hours. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rob (talk | contribs) 19:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. RolandR (talk) 00:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: - Repeated deletion of the same portion of the article by unregistered users, with no explanation for deletion given. This has happened approximately 15 times in the last several months. 850 C (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - subject to constant, silly vandalism. Legit contributions are all from established accounts. Plenty of watchers to handle requested edits but they spend most of their time reverting vandalism at the moment. Stalwart111 22:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Several anonymous users keep vandalizing the article, adding nonsence for "fun". I've tried to stop them myself but to no avail.--Malvodion (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: 398 transclusions. I'm surprised it's template-editor. meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please ask the original protecting admin (discounting the script-assisted edit), User:Mr. Stradivarius. My personal opinion is that it's used enough to warrant semi protection at the least. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't remember why I protected it, to be honest. Perhaps it had more transclusions last year than it does now. Anyway, I've lowered the protection to semi. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 00:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 02:12, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I can see this is a perennial problem. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. for the bot. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long history of IP vandalism due to fan's believing they know what's happening on series, despite the series not commenting on a person's status. Purely fancruft editors trying to disrupt. livelikemusic my talk page! 02:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - done indefinitely as is a perennial problem. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. for the bot. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Due to high-level IP vandalism addition of unsourced and unfounded information, due to high-profiled nature of series and its constantly changing cast. livelikemusic my talk page! 02:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced additions and vandalism to a WP:BLP. STATic message me! 01:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: High level of vandalism. This player in the NFL has recently signed a 1-year deal for the New England Patriots. A lot of Jets fans are going after this artcle and I really mean...no I shouldn't say it but this is an emergency. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 01:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No need for long term protection, if his jersey number hasn't been decided in the next ten days we can re-semi it if needed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – General template-editor level-lowering rationale. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 02:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and very frequent vandalism by newly registered accounts. Jinkinson talk to me 19:03, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Jakob (talk) 18:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 19:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Somebody added random tags somewhy. JonaQwer (talk) 17:25, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. One may agree or disagree with the templates, but their presence is not a cause for protection. Favonian (talk) 17:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

14 March 2014

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The previous semi didn't do much. --Jakob (talk) 18:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

temporary semi protection - long term vandalism by someone from dynamic IP range. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 08:34, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SFK2 (talk) 06:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 06:18, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced attacks against living people. Jevansen (talk) 06:10, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: To match Template:Location map USA Alabama which it is replacing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruptive edits by IP editors. SMS Talk 05:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:02, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Seems to me like there's been a lot of IP vandalism. Jsayre64 (talk) 04:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:02, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Only needed to keep attribution after pseudo-move. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:28, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined no need for edit=sysop. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:16, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Only needed to keep attribution after pseudo-move. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:28, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined no need for edit=sysop. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:16, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Only needed to keep attribution after pseudo-move. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already fully move protected and semi'd, I don't see a need to fully protect it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP vandalism. STATic message me! 04:17, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit rate is too high for PC. If it continues after the semi expires let me know and I'll have a look at another semi or PC. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SeaphotoTalk 03:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:24, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and dubious unsourced additions to a BLP. STATic message me! 02:02, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:22, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Only needed to keep attribution after pseudo-move. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:34, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. No need for edit=sysop. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:18, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Cirt (talk) 01:31, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:20, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Only needed to keep attribution after pseudo-move. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:35, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. and kept the edit=autoconfirmed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:15, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (semi for three days). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:17, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Only needed to keep attribution after pseudo-move. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:13, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: To match Template:Location map USA Alaska which it is replacing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: To match Template:Location map USA which it is replacing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced additions, vandalism and genre warring . STATic message me! 01:50, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a week. I think that would be enough, though I will keep an eye on it. → Call me Hahc21 02:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To match Template:Location map Nepal which it is replacing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:06, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To match Template:Location map Italy which it is replacing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent inclusion of copyright-violating material by various IPs. See also ongoing content dispute on the talk page. I'm not trying to force-close the dispute by protection, but the additional copyright isssue calls for an immediate intervention. — HHHIPPO 22:49, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a week. → Call me Hahc21 23:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP problems. This page has been subjected to a series of attacks from IP users. In reviewing the logs it is rather clear that this Wiki has been used to support a assault upon the facility. It is also rather clear that a series of COI's regarding the editors that are contributing is effecting the page. WPPilot talk--WPPilot 20:12, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I don't know what's going on there, but protection won't help; there are issues with both versions being edit-warred over. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Addition of poorly sourced content. This player in the NFL has recently signed a 2-year deal for the Oakland Raiders. I'll keep bringing more free agents if they are any out there. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 20:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: One editor has moved the page to Ken Hutchinson (disambiguation) three times in the last few days, even though WP:DABNAME applies. Steel1943 (talk) 17:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:20, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lukeming (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, best left ot COIN or BLPN. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done here [26]. JNW (talk) 18:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The war over where one of the sister cities actually is has started again. Can we lock it and make them talk it out?. John from Idegon (talk) 16:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, but will monitor. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Randomly, people are adding new parties without citations. RRD13 (talk) 16:00, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Herald talk with me 13:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

15 March 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hi, requesting 1 week protection from IPs at Mr. Bean. It's being peppered with nonsense from IPs who have been active for several days. 1 week might send a dissuasive message. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 05:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by anonymous users. . Phill24th (talk) 15:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — JamesR (talk) 15:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism, all by IP editors, PC would solve this. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 11:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 18:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 1 month. Page has been repeated target of IP vandalism from multiple sources. LT910001 (talk) 08:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 18:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – one of several non-notable Thai volleyball clubs, as discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive831#String of Volleyball Thailand League pages. Ruby Murray 10:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 17:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued additions of dubious unsourced content after the end of recent protection period. STATic message me! 06:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 18:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 04:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 18:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems like someone is creating new accounts to vandalize this article. QED237 (talk) 11:22, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a few instances (2/3 blocked) in the last two days. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Editors using multiple IPs. Call me Keenan (talk) 19:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined page deleted per WP:G4. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple instances of future based edits in violation of WP:FUTURE as well as numerous non-sourced additions. Performed by unregistered users primarily. Protection requested through August 1, 2014Kevintampa5 (talk) 02:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:07, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Tendentious editing by an autoconfirmed user. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:03, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Both warned for edit warring, consider WP:ANEW if it continues. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:13, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There's been no pattern in IP vandalism, but I'd guess this is due to school kids. I'd like PC1 until July. Vandalism resumed as soon as the previous protection expired. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've semi'd rather than applied pending changes because there's nothing constructive there either. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced additions, vandalism and a disruptive IP hopper. STATic message me! 11:05, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:06, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. VQuakr (talk) 00:58, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Editors are using multiple IPs. Call me Keenan (talk) 19:13, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and users blocked/warned. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – regulary NPOV, BLP violation. NickSt (talk) 10:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adabow (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Needs temporary semiprotection against persistent copyvios by sockpuppets; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mooni singh raizada. (Note this is a different page than the one below!) Psychonaut (talk) 11:37, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Needs temporary semiprotection against persistent copyvios by sockpuppets; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mooni singh raizada. (Note this is a different page than the one above!) Psychonaut (talk) 11:32, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. Uncletomwood (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Template has twice been visited by vandal KuhnstylePro and at least one of his socks, MartinoGameMaster. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I normally wouldn't protect with that little amount of activity but given it's a template is transcluded at least more than 40 times I've semi'd it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This template has been visited a few times by sock operator KuhnstylePro and his socks Pithcrystal, Crocigator and MartinoGameMaster. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple IPs making same edit. Jcitme (talk) 21:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Needs temporary semiprotection against persistent copyvios by sockpuppets; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mooni singh raizada. Psychonaut (talk) 11:32, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

16 March 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent and ongoing IP vandalism and addition of unsourced content and speculation.-- Isaidnoway (talk) 19:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Approved. I will review in a few days. --Asteriontalk 20:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The usual Balkan sockpuppetry. Three different IPs have been used, but they're all from the same ISP. . bobrayner (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC

Semi-protected Approved. I will review in a few days. --Asteriontalk 20:19, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Cirt (talk) 15:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's 50 edit history spans back to 2012, and there have only been two vandalism edits in the last month. kelapstick(bainuu) 15:59, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Death hoax being spread by someone spoofing US Magazine and TMZ. NellieBly (talk) 17:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Bongwarrior (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (2 days) tutterMouse (talk) 18:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 15:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please protect until a discussion on his place of birth happens. JMHamo (talk) 21:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. Report was good at the time, but it looks like things have calmed down a bit since then so I'm going to hold off for now. AlexiusHoratius 15:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator AlexiusHoratius. (3 days) Armbrust The Homunculus 19:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Referee just gave three penalties to one team. Lot of IP disruption now. QED237 (talk) 15:19, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit warring/re-addition of unsourced content. AldezD (talk) 15:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:15, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:46, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Obvious WP:Sockpuppetry going on; see here. WP:Edit war is now in place. Flyer22 (talk) 05:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also note this. Flyer22 (talk) 13:46, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Daan0001 (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Salvio giuliano.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP-vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 13:48, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated vandalism and dubious content changes by IP editors. The article was protected until recently, but the protection was removed. - Aurorion (talk) 11:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:10, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism for over a month now. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 07:47, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:10, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widefox; talk 07:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor inserting crude Chinese characters, something about slaves. Binksternet (talk) 04:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection persistent vandalism. 117Avenue (talk) 03:33, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Influx of agenda-motivated IPs; someone mentioned on a board that Reddit users had been vandalizing the "men's rights movement" article, and they've evidently found their way here too. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Police Story (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: Resumption of IP-hopping vandalism (e.g. extreme overlinking, disruptive unref overprecision) shortly after previous protection expired. Dl2000 (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done by C.Fred. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:46, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Template editor user right. No, I don't plan to work on this now, but would find it convenient to have access to it when I do need it. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 05:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Only 2408 transclusions. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Discrepancies regarding her age is leading to a high amount of warring among IP and newly created accounts. A temporary semi-protection may be beneficial until her age is confirmed. . KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. I'd intended to make it one month, but my finger slipped, so it's instead indefinite. Looking further at the degree of excitement thereabouts, I'm unable to regret the slip of the finger. Any rational, unexcited editor is welcome to ask me to lift the s-protection, and of course any admin is welcome to lift it. -- Hoary (talk) 14:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – usual ufc vandals. Smarkflea (talk) 01:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The level of vandalism is huge... Please hurry. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 02:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as the protection expires, IP vandals start multiplying like mosquitoes. This is not the first time it has happened. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But will monitor. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism, dubious unsourced additions and other cases of disruption by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 04:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. Some examples of bad edits would be helpful. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring logged in and out, disruptivly adding copyrighted text. STATic message me! 04:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I've left warnings for both the IP and the user about copyright. Continued posting can be resolved with blocks. Mike V • Talk 18:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs linked to Archimedes Trading Ltd. and new SP called BaumeisterSeligman, created specifically to avoid IP tracking. --Farnishk (talk) 02:25, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Farnishk: Registering an account to avoid "IP tracking" is not only permitted, but encouraged by policy. It's only becomes an issue when the editor continues to use both the account and the IP address to give the appearance of additional support. I've declined this request as the issue appears to be with only one user. Situations such as this are better handled through user talk page discussions. Mike V • Talk 18:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually three users linked to the same company - will keep a close watch, though. --Farnishk (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by SPAs and IP vandalis. Unsourced additions. Multiple IPs making same edit. Izatoesca, BotstartE, 71.46.230.130, 173.165.156.205, and others. LoyolaGirl (talk) 22:25, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @LoyolaGirl: This is a content issue, not vandalism. I would encourage you to initiate discussion on the talk page. In general, continued edit warring without discussion will lead to blocks or full protection of the page. Mike V • Talk 18:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection and Semi-protection: User:Wetdogmeat ignored consensus regarding primary topic and WP:TWODABS and proceeded to move the page True Detective to True Detective (disambiguation) to flout the already rejected move request. Request that his changes be undone and the articles be move protected and other protection as warranted.--ColonelHenry (talk) 17:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected. I've move-protected True Detective and True Detective (TV series). I wasn't sure which changes need to be undone or how semi-protection fits in, so I've just left things with the move protection. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SlimVirgin: - Thanks, but...True Detective (disambiguation) needed to be moved back to True Detective (which now redirects, sadly, against previously-established consensus to True Detective (TV series)). Now it just cements into place Wetdogmeat's anti-consensus move and redirect, and wasn't the help that I requested.--ColonelHenry (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've moved True Detective (disambiguation) to True Detective. SlimVirgin (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent deletion of content or section blanking by IPs with the same edit summary, "reverting vandalism." Two week protection would be appreciated. - Darouet (talk) 18:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 18:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tempoary semi-protection: Constant inclusion of questionable material. Also, I will begin to make changes/moves of list next week to comply with Featured List standards without engaging in edit war or accusations of vandalism.--Birdienest81 (talk) 23:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 17:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Several instances of anon user reverting without explanation whatsoever. It would be beneficial to semi-protect the page, for at least a week or two, considering the fairly recent events and dispute on that same article. Shokatz (talk) 19:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 17:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

17 March 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated insertion of material by IP against consensus. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indef is too long for the first time listing at RFPP. Bearian (talk) 19:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's a Hot topic in Indian elections now due to the announcement of a Popular Politician to contest from the constituency and there is an edit war now between the supporters of different political parties,The other political party is yet to announce and most probably they will announce it by 23rd March,Please protect it till 23rd March.Janmejai (Talk) 07:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Atama頭 21:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Today, March 17 is the festival Holi in South Asia. The page is being viewed frequently, but suffering persistent vandalism from IP editors. Request page protection for 72 hours, to help maintain the page quality till the holiday traffic subside. Abbey kershaw (talk) 07:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 19:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ganesh J. Acharya (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Indeffed user is continuing his conspiracy campaign via his talk page, misusing {{help me}} template to further timesuck. Requesting talk page be off-limits to indeffed user. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, edits contrary to reliable sources. Wikibojopayne (talk) 00:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NW (Talk) 01:13, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: To match Template:New York Stock Exchange. Svgalbertian (talk) 04:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever can be done, perennial target. Sportfan5000 (talk) 01:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like pending changes is doing it's job. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 7 day protection from IPs. Users keep adding unsourced future series end dates in conflict with WP:CRYSTAL. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:48, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It has started back up again, and there are a lot of edits being reverted in the recent history of the page. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 15:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like it's stopped and we're back to constructive edits, the best idea would probably be to report IPs to AIV as the disruption will be dealt with quicker there. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, part of me wonders if it was a raid, as it was pretty bad when I requested it, but it has almost ceased since then. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:52, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Addition of copyright violations from multiple IP addresses. Page has already been temporarily semi-protected twice, but each time the copyright violations continue once protection has expired. Dendrite1 (talk) 00:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Kabesang Tales (talk) 00:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 23:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. It's been going on for long enough. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Linkspam for non-notable fork. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:02, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 30 day protection from IPs. One IP hopper in particular, whose IPs geolocate to Pakistan, is intent on disrupting this article. 182.189.107.56, 182.189.99.141, 182.189.35.102, 182.189.16.113, 182.189.244.61, 182.189.20.222. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism

Declined The issue is restricted to only one IP and there haven't been any further issues after the final warning. If it continues, a block would resolve the problem. --Asteriontalk 20:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit war despite consensus on talk page. MasonBanks (talk) 23:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Semi-protected for one week, but there are accounts making the same edits, so it might not be enough. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Subject of off-wiki canvassing here. Problematic content has been re-inserted by three different IP's. I also just posted at the NPOV/N here. VQuakr (talk) 19:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User above is engaged in edit war and keeps blanking the page. Pot, kettle, black! The article needs to be protected, not semiprotected so he can game the system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.167.85.233 (talk) 19:58, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The issue is restricted to only one IP and yourself. This is essentially a content dispute. Take it to WP:RfC. --Asteriontalk 20:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user replacing content with unnecessary and irrelevant content. 𝕁𝕠𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕟𝕂𝕪𝕤𝕖𝕣𝟚𝟚 𝕋𝕒𝕝𝕜 𝕥𝕠 𝕞𝕖 / 𝕊𝕖𝕖 𝕙𝕠𝕨 𝕀 𝕒𝕞 𝕕𝕠𝕚𝕟𝕘 / 𝕄𝕪 𝕠𝕨𝕟 𝕦𝕤𝕖𝕣𝕓𝕠𝕩𝕖𝕤 18:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The issue is restricted to only one IP and there haven't been any further issues after the final warning. If it continues, a block would resolve the problem. Mike V • Talk 19:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Herald 15:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mike V • Talk 18:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

18 March 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protected for a week last week, soon as unprotected, range of Indian IPs have gone right back to doing the same thing in ignorance of edit summaries and policy. Several IPs all traceable to the same area, so probably harder to block them all than protect the page. DWB (talk) / Comment on Dishonored's FA nom! 18:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:34, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: frequent vandalisms(blanking the page) commited by the ip users. KazekageTR (talk) 13:45, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's only one IP user who's blanking the article. If he does that again, please report him to WP:AIV. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: To match Template:Sister, which has nearly 12 times as many transclusions. Thanks, LittleMountain5 19:18, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since article protection was lifted on the 15th, vandalism has been occurring several times per day. I don't recall how long the last protection order was, but I'm requesting more time than last, and protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed editors. Thank you, . Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:19, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:MarcusBrutusKillsCaesar (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Sockpuppeteer with history of vandalism continues to chatter on his talk page. Recommending indefinite block. . Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:48, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent upswing in daily vandalism. Diannaa (talk) 14:20, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated attack page or negatively sourced BLP. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:10, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Tiptoety talk 17:11, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over an extensive period. JNW (talk) 17:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months. Tiptoety talk 17:07, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hi, requesting 24 hour protection from IPs at this article. IP hopper is, for whatever reason, messing with the subject's name in lead. 24 hour block may dissuade him. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:17, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP keeps reverting an editor's attempts to weed out all the non-RS material. I see it's already been protected once 9-11 March. Le Deluge (talk) 22:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected because at that stage it was just one IP - now it's several, and the revert frequency is increasing. As an outsider to the article, it just feels like this sort of article about a new development is vulnerable to getting caught up in real-world politics; the fact that there's already evidence of off-wiki canvassing should be a bit of a red flag. Le Deluge (talk) 02:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:12, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of two years. Tiptoety talk 16:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – more than just a week of semi-protection is required. DaHuzyBru (talk) 13:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For the moment, a week seems adequate. If disruption flares up again after that, please re-report it here. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:10, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of obscene pics due to my RCP patrollings. Herald 13:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.. When you no longer want your userpage protected, do let me know. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent point-making vandalism by IP who responded to repeated warnings by stating intention to switch IPs and continued vandalizing. Fat&Happy (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. User(s) blocked.. Tiptoety talk 07:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: A Highly visible, high traffic disputed page. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined High traffic it is, higly visible it is....for the moment; disputes that would warrant semi-protection I see not. Most of the edits are by autoconfirmed users....Lectonar (talk) 09:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This game was featured on a popular comedic Youtube channel, in which the hosts named one of the characters by a different name from the game ("Mike" instead of "Buddy"); as such, lots of IPs have been changing the name here to reflect. Would like a few months of semi to hopefully let the joke die out. MASEM (t) 22:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism, dubious unsourced additions/changes and just general disruption by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 15:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same IPs constantly add material with no reliable sources. Been going on for over a month. Caldorwards4 (talk) 04:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. 108.... already had a last warning. Lectonar (talk)

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, unsourced changes. ZoidXsa (talk) 21:50, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Added semi-protection for 10 days. After that, the existing pending changes protection will continue. Orlady (talk) 03:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to current events. 220.245.92.220 (talk) 22:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:17, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Echoedmyron (talk) 20:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Orlady (talk) 02:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edits by unconfirmed users tend to be the addition of incomplete proofs or vandalism. Jamesx12345 19:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Orlady (talk) 02:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Cirt (talk) 18:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Bearian. Orlady (talk) 02:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently, there has been a slew of vandalism edits by solely IP users, as well as edit warring between reverting these edits and the IP users doing such as well. I request that there be semi-protection added to prevent these sorts of edits. Thank you. Ging287 (talk) 16:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Orlady (talk) 02:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Per WP:COMMONNAME, Concertación is the name of most common usage in English-language academic sources to refer to the historic Chilean left-wing coalition of parties. An user insists on putting an English translation instead, when it has been proven that the most common usage in English is, Concertación instead. El Pichilemino (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:22, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Launchballer 15:04, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection (preferably a few months): Continued WP:Disruptive editing, including WP:Sockpuppetry, by Sahyadrisingh (talk · contribs). Sahyadrisingh, via his or her talk page and WP:Edit summaries, has been told to take the matter to the talk page, to stop WP:Edit warring and to stop WP:Sockpuppeting, but Sahyadrisingh remains unresponsive and keeps ignoring the warnings/advice. He or she is now using Dynamic IPs to edit war and evade WP:Scrutiny (which is a form of WP:Sockpuppetry). The only response I have gotten from this editor so far is thanks via WP:Echo for this revert I made concerning one of his or her edits; I don't think it was a mock, but I do think that the editor is either too new to understand how Wikipedia is supposed to work or will never understand how it is supposed to work (WP:Competence issues). Flyer22 (talk) 14:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The above editor has finally responded in a different way...by not only reverting me, but by taking the time to address me at my talk page about the Peyton Sawyer topic. It may be that semi-protecting the Peyton Sawyer article is no longer needed, but I think that we should err on the side of caution and that the article should therefore be semi-protected for at least one or two weeks, which might help encourage talk page discussion when Sahyadrisingh can't use various IPs to revert and edit war. I will refrain from reverting Sahyadrisingh or any more of the IPs in the meantime. Flyer22 (talk) 17:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:16, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Anon user has been reverting several users for over a week now, nonsensical and disruptive reverts without any explanation in summary or on talk page. It would be nice to get some semi-protect to stop this nonsense. Shokatz (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:19, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: This article is subject to major NPOV issues after the people of Crimea voted to leave Ukraine and join Russia. This is unrecognized by any state except Russia. There is already an article at Republic of Crimea about the "unrecognized" Republic so this article should continue to reflect its "recognized" status as part of Ukraine. . JOJ Hutton 17:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - This user believes the term "official" insinuates that a region or people need the permission of the US and UE to do anything. This independence is recognized by the people of the land, the ones who live and work on it. Their recognition, when it all comes down to it, is the only recognition that should matter, not outsiders.

What this user is trying to do is ensure that his POV is maintained regardless of what else goes in that section of the world because he feels that wrongful information could sway others into his line of thinking (again, that being POV).

As another nation has stated: the will and self-determination of a people should be respected. Wikipedia should remain neutral, not serve as a political front for any side. Hawaiifive0 (talk) 19:13, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - @Jojhutton: I'm declining to protect this article fully, because this request looks like an attempt to "freeze" the article in place which is against the entire nature of the project. If there was a specific dispute that needed to be resolved on the discussion page of the article I would be willing to protect the page until the dispute was resolved. However, from what I can see there are many disputes on that page as the result of current events, and I'm not comfortable with a full protection implemented indefinitely with no indication as to what circumstances should result in the protection being removed. You'll have to deal with disputes as usual at the page, and while I understand that it's a large undertaking to do so with the attention this issue has received internationally, it's necessary. If there is a specific issue that is causing disruption, then protection may be considered until that issue is resolved.
@Hawaiifive0: Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Please make discussions about content using Wikipedia's standards for neutrality, as information is verified by reliable sources, not determined by the advocacy of a particular cause or to further justice for a nation or people. This project is not the place for that. -- Atama頭 19:50, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An anonymous IP is changing the area of the Ottoman Empire with obviously inflated data, contrary to present RS. He refuses to go to the talk page but keeps reverting. Alex2006 (talk) 13:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 78.163.44.216 (talk · contribs). for one week for edit-warring and personal attacks. -- Atama頭 19:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An anonymous IP is changing the area of the Ottoman Empire with obviously inflated data, contrary to present RS. He refuses to go to the talk page but keeps reverting. Alex2006 (talk) 13:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 78.163.44.216 (talk · contribs). for one week for edit-warring and personal attacks. -- Atama頭 19:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors persist in adding uncited western political labels with no explanation. This is likely to continue until April 9, the date of Indonesia's general election. Davidelit (Talk) 05:00, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 18:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered editors repeatedly adding uncited information about the party ideology. This is likely to continue until at east April 9, when this party will contest the general election. Davidelit (Talk) 04:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 18:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 17:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - I understand it's frustrating to deal with an editor who isn't responding to your requests to stop, but the edits the IP is making aren't vandalism. You've only communicated with the IP in such a manner as to stay "stop". Since this isn't vandalism, your reverts have put you on the edge of a 3RR violation yourself. The only persistent disruption (if you want to call it that) has been from a single IP, and if any action would be taken at the page, it would be to block that one IP (though, as stated, there is no need for a block unless both of you are blocked for edit-warring). If the IP insists on reinserting this information again (they may have given up at this point) you can let me know, and I'll consider taking some action to try to force them into a discussion. -- Atama頭 19:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

19 March 2014

Semi-protection due to repeated IP removal of vast amounts of text for no reason recently (see [27]). Quis separabit? 18:35, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Clear abuse of pending changes privilege where it has become tedious to decline them all. STATic message me! 18:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 17:35, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:46, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 17:35, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:45, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary semi protection request due to spam and link promotion. — Cirt (talk) 15:23, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:44, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Subject of article has persistently been engaging in vandalism, promotion, and addition of erroneous information, always from either IPs or throwaway accounts. felt_friend 15:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 15:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection:

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Both on the redirect and on the target of the redirect. kelapstick(bainuu) 15:15, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widefox; talk 07:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Akbaranntoni (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. kelapstick(bainuu) 15:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Фаиз Махмудов‎ sockpuppet editing the article, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Фаиз Махмудов for confirmation . Darkness Shines (talk) 12:15, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Relist if he pops back up. GedUK  13:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected. GedUK  13:55, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 14.96.204.137 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) constantly removing [reliably sourced] content to promote the subject of the article. I have reverted thrice. Previous IP was blocked, this one again. High chances that another IP will crop up if this one gets blocked. So requesting semi-protection. Thus content removal questions the neutrality of the article as also is an example of cherrypicking. – Soham (talk) 11:38, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and User(s) blocked. GedUK  13:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Have been protected long enough. (t) Josve05a (c) 10:08, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't see it happening, not even at pending changes level. This article has a chronic issue with vandalism and sockpuppetry, it'd be foolish to unprotect knowing it'd start up again. tutterMouse (talk) 11:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Please ask Elockid (talk · contribs), who protected it. GedUK  13:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP sock of Фаиз Махмудов. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. I've done the one below now, as well. GedUK  13:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – To force user intent on moving away from stable title to seek consensus via a WP:RM. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. GedUK  13:33, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The draft at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Warwick Economics Summit is ready to be moved into mainspace. I don't see any reason why the move should be prevented - the article is well developed and fully compliant with the minimum standards for mainspace articles. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Dodger67: I've moved it (eventually after cocking up the first go). Please be aware of the issues raised at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warwick Economics Summit which were mainly about the independnce of the sources. On a quick glance, they definitely look better than the time it was deleted, but I'd advise you to have a thorough check, or it'll get deleted again. GedUK  13:45, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edits are either vandalism or unsourced - this is not straightforward article for a new user to work on. Jamesx12345 08:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's a lot of good faith IP edits on that page, so I'm reluctant to go for semi. Pending changes looks to be a better option as the volume of edits is quite low. Additionally, there's no recent page protection history on the page, so indef would be overkill. GedUK  12:41, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all of the countless IP edits to this page are vandalism, with the only exceptions being the occasional IP that reverts another IPs vandalism. The article is made up of lists which do not need to be edited. All the lists of current rankings use templates. Any updates are made to the individual template. The historical rankings are editable, but they should never change. Please view page edit history for the last year for an indication to the extent of the problem. Jevansen (talk) 06:58, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not comfortable going indef just yet, it's had little protection in the past. GedUK  12:33, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Touchy topic due to ongoing news events. Unsourced additions as well. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:28, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This subject, an association football player with dual citizenship, has made a request of FIFA to change national team representation. Until he plays for a senior men's team, nothing more should be added to the article and a number of anons have been adding premature information. A few weeks should be sufficient. The player's club article has recently been protected for similar reasons. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:26, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. More than one editor reverting here is autoconfirmed, so semi-protection might not be enough. Also, I don't think it would be fair to full-protect FC Bayern Munich and semi-protect this article, as it is essentially the same dispute. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:42, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recurring IP vandalism. – voidxor (talk | contrib) 05:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent namecruft from floating ip. John from Idegon (talk) 04:38, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced additions and BLP violations . STATic message me! 01:45, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sock puppetry and other unsourced changes and WP:OR. STATic message me! 01:44, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive edits, vandalism, and original research. – Recollected • 23:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:29, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IP users tampering with the Reception section. Areaseven (talk) 23:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 22:44, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-and-off, cyclical vandalism, but when it does come back there's a lot of it. Jinkinson talk to me 21:18, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Hopefully pending changes will deter the vandals. If not, you might need to make another request here for long-term semi-protection. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:07, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive edits. SMS Talk 00:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for two weeks. What a mess. → Call me Hahc21 00:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and dubious unsourced additions to a BLP. STATic message me! 23:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for two weeks. → Call me Hahc21 00:27, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated addition of promotional material by several new user accounts. Mean as custard (talk) 16:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - User(s) blocked.. Tiptoety talk 16:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: recent upswing in unconstructive edits today. NiciVampireHeart 23:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent recreation of article without proof of notability and a high spam content; created and now restored by SPAs. Drmies (talk) 20:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Multiple editors warring over content. Binksternet (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mike V.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

20 March 2014

Full protection There is a lot of edit-warring on this article, which is under deletion review, and at least one editor has been blocked for personal attacks. Request full protection until editors can agree among themselves on how the article should be written or whether it should be deleted. TFD (talk) 19:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:42, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various IP users who claim the film is in English. Areaseven (talk) 16:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:40, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1001 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:38, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Since December 2013, this template has been vandalised by EstebanJals via 142.129.199.97 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)), Duchh8888 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), 2605:e000:bc85:2600:9081:a6d0:c2df:1c92 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)), Wwwestebancom (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), I Am SBX-335 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), Wiki Channel Neteork (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), and I've reported KingFontana V (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) as another EstebanJals sock. —rybec 14:13, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: protected back in September 2010 [28] (almost 3.5 years ago). Protection is no longer needed as the article is very stable with more than 742 watchers [29]. It is so stable that weeks pass by without a single edit. We need to allow unregistered users to edit it so that the article can continue to be developed. Furthermore, the protection admin has not edited the article since March 15, 2010 (4 years ago). [30] —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. No need to consult the protecting admin as it's one of mine. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Has been indefinitely semi-protected since 2008. Unprotection should be given a try now. (The protecting admin appears inactive, having made no edits this year). Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Has been indef semi'd since 2007. Unprotection should be tried for a while. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: protect this page as redirect, editors adding again and again unsourced material in this redirected page. ChanderForYou 05:24, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: For the same reasons as Yevpatoria below. Thanatos|talk|contributions 04:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Edit war already starting; see History tab. Bearian (talk) 19:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: For the same reason as Livadiya, Ukraine below. As you can see at the page's history, a battle has already begun thereat. By semi-protecting it we would at least save us the trouble of edit warring against IP-anonymous editors. Thanatos|talk|contributions 04:10, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: It would be an in part preemptive protection against a potential edit war, beign part of the general Crimean dispute edit war; in part refers to this, i.e. perhaps a signal of a coming edit war.
P.S. The article belongs to the obvious category of being problematic in how to describe therein without a contradiction the dispute, since the name of the article/page itself contains the word Ukraine.
Thanatos|talk|contributions 03:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. But do come back if problems materialise. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (sorry, edit conflict!) Bearian (talk) 19:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism to a BLP. STATic message me! 02:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last time I attempted to get this page protected, it was denied on the grounds of: "Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection." Well, since January of this year, this page has been vandalized by IPs over 40 times. Here is an incomplete list of oldids which illustrate the vandal IP edits:

I rest my case. CrowzRSA 02:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC). CrowzRSA 02:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1001 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection, perhaps long-term, Repeated BLP outing attempts of a porn star, whose identity is being tied to the school as a way to identify her, see Wikipedia:BLPN#Belle Knox. Sportfan5000 (talk) 01:16, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over descriptions in the lede. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:19, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Per consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/RfC_for_AfC_reviewer_permission_implementation - This will act as the list for the script to access. --Mdann52talk to me! 08:38, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but that seems like a terrible idea to me. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:16, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widefox; talk 07:07, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:13, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widefox; talk 07:01, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous protection expired on 23 February (protection templates removed on 26 February). Since then there have been 35 edits and all of them, without exception, have been vandalism related (vandalism or reverting vandalism). Therefore request indefinite page protection on at least autoconfirmed user level. Wolbo (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Vandalism/unhelpful/test edits come and go every 2 weeks or so--not often enough for semi, but enough for PC (I think). Jinkinson talk to me 19:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 23:02, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection due to protracted edit warring by IPs. BethNaught (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.: I've blocked one spam account, two IPs, and one account (the latter 3 for violating 3RR). Given that they were the major contributors to the problem, I think this may resolve the issue. If it continues then I'd be glad to revisit page protection. Mike V • Talk 21:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There seems to be edit warring on this page between IP users, where a group of users keeps adding an unconfirmed future opening date without citing a reliable source. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:10, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection IP nonsense.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done indefinitely semi'ed - long term problem. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:50, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected For the bot. Mike V • Talk 21:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant unexplained removal of content by IP users (mostly 122.x.x.x) every few days dating back to last November. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:14, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Edit warring by two Anon IP's. One in Sweden the other in Colorado, USA. Both may have WP:COI issues, judging by their long term rhetoric on the article talk page. Richard Harvey (talk) 10:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - this could be protracted so going for long time period and hoping folks will make accounts. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

21 March 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC isn't holding off much longer. George Ho (talk) 21:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Materialscientist (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High-traffic article with some different IPs keep adding an image with false descriptions or non-subtly changing words to expletives and other. Cold Season (talk) 18:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected 2 weeks. Xavexgoem (talk) 19:15, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Fred Phelps (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi for maybe a few days to fend off the "Ding-Dong, the Witch Is Dead" kind of stuff from various IP's. The article itself, too, if it isn't already done. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't think there is enough vandalism to justify protection. It's likely this will stop as the coverage begins to fade. Also, the article is already protected for a couple of days. Mike V • Talk 17:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Retiring this page/account. Can someone also delete my edit history for this page and my talk page?. Greg D. Barnes (talk) 18:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected I've protected the page and performed the deletion for the user page. I cannot do so for the talk page, as it is only done in exceptional situations. Mike V • Talk 18:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – (If someone could start a suckpuppet investiation too?). (t) Josve05a (c) 18:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Mike V • Talk 18:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper is repeatedly vandalizing the article. buffbills7701 15:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:18, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – This template is the meta-template for all the speedy deletion notices. . buffbills7701 13:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Mike V • Talk 17:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/reversion. ► Philg88 ◄ talk 08:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

temporary move protect: The page has been subjected to a large number of moves it the last two weeks and they should cease as any moves should be considered controversial. Labattblueboy (talk) 06:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just two editors warring. I've moved it back to Comox people, the name it was before the move war began. I will ask both editors to stop and get consensus at talk before further moves. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No consensus exists for use of PC on pages that aren't articles. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:19, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. It was only a few days ago; please talk to the protecting admin. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:49, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An inane, sausage-obsessed troll keeps coming to Salmon to vandalize the page, and returns after every time its current account gets blocked for vandalism and or sockpuppetry.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The same dubious unsourced additions and vandalism that just recently got the page protected. STATic message me! 03:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP vandalism and sock puppetry . STATic message me! 02:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:31, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism in the last few days. Quenhitran (talk) 01:56, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. FYI Deville since I've changed your protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:30, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism from many IP editors, multiple attempts at vandalism over months for many years. LT910001 (talk) 01:53, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:28, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism from multiple IP sources, multiple events per month lasting many years; recent upspike in vandalism from several unique IP editors. LT910001 (talk) 01:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple instances of IP vandalism from different sources in the past month. LT910001 (talk) 01:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent flood of IP vandalism. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 22:59, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, recurrent IP vandalism. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 22:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We generally don't indef semi protect pages which don't have a lot of ongoing activity or pages which haven't been protected before. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:21, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been subjected to ongoing recurrent acts of vandalism by anonymous users for the past several months; semi-protecting the page would stem the flood of IP vandalism. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 22:50, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 22:18, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (t) Josve05a (c) 20:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, clearly more complicated than just petty vandalism. Try talking to them. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hi, requesting 48 hour protection from IPs. A Chinese IP is on a campaign to post nonsense and provocative content on this article. There have been repeated submissions of this sort of content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:39, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Please page protection to Yoshihiro Sato, Hiroya (kickboxer). (And maybe Tetsuya Yamato and Joseph Valtellini).

Because in they biography they also competitive in Muay Thai. I also talk to that IP but he still no use any reference with no reason explanation. And I always asked consult from third person. It better if use discuss page to explanation.

This article to be neutral. And friendly to both side. --B20180 (talk) 07:40, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:36, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same reason. --B20180 (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same as Livadiya, Ukraine below, but utterly preemptive. Thanatos|talk|contributions 04:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 20:58, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:36, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden spike in vandalism in the past month, no constructive IP edit. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Until dispute over article content is resolved. Jdogno5 (talk) 00:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The administrator who reviews this request should be made aware of this 3RR report filed against User:Jdogno5. I don't recommend protecting the article since the disruption involves a single editor and can be resolved at ANI. Betty Logan (talk) 00:15, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:10, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

22 March 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Football fans are upset about a recent decision. Sjö (talk) 13:56, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:08, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. K6ka (talk | contribs) 12:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Various IPs making this addition in recent days. CIreland (talk) 08:49, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Seems to be a bit of a predicament over the controversies section. Edit warring is occurring, temporary protection advisable?. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 20:51, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Short period of time. Eyesnore (pc) 16:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 20:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP vandalism by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 05:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:49, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism and unsourced edits from IPs and new users.LM2000 (talk) 04:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:51, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It's her 102nd birthday today. Eyesnore (pc) 04:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, she's today's subject for a Google Doodle, just needs a day. tutterMouse (talk) 15:03, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 22:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakr\ talk / 08:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing by IPs and new users. RA0808 talkcontribs 21:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done — for now. The IP has been blocked for evasion, but if it continues to another IP while the block's still active (or he starts doing the same thing again), feel free to re-report. --slakr\ talk / 08:04, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring, against consensus. refusal to go to the talk page. Breaking of 3RR. Alex2006 (talk) 17:15, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Enok (talk · contribs).; feel free to re-request if it continues. --slakr\ talk / 07:49, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks! I restored the article to its stable state, inviting at the same time people wanting to change it to go first to the talk page. Alex2006 (talk) 07:56, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations by sock puppets. Semi-protection previously suggested here. GentlemanGhost (converse) 01:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samir 04:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations by same sock puppets as above. Semi-protection of target articles previously suggested here. GentlemanGhost (converse) 02:50, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samir 04:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP sock notorious for targeting Rani Mukerji and filmography page is back with the same sort of POV-pushing agenda. KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:19, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. for three months by Bbb23. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP sock who was responsible for the article being protected a few weeks ago is back, with the same set of POV pushing agenda. KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. for three months by Bbb23. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:07, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Election is only just announced and already the vandals are out. I suggest 12 months. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One IP is not enough to justify protection (semi or PC). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow edit war - over fairly minor edits. I'm not happy with what's going on but I've been involved with the article before. I don't think BRD is an appropriate claim to make here for reverting. Dougweller (talk) 10:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done but more importantly warned both editors of edit warring. --slakr\ talk / 07:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring from an IP user. Unnecessary editing of a Featured Article with poor images and incorrectly referenced sources. 3RR rule being ignored on multiple occasions. Stevo1000 (talk) 19:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samir 04:42, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Lower to semi with other speedy deletion templates. Eyesnore (pc) 01:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please ask the protecting admin (User:Fuhghettaboutit) before posting here. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Highly visible template – No need for full. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:42, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – No need for this to be fully protected and I would like to trim down the transclusion size by trimming the css code. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 22:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – No need for this to be fully protected and I would like to trim down the transclusion size by trimming the css code. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 22:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. RA0808 talkcontribs 21:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. No need to protect the page now. → Call me Hahc21 22:37, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The same IP block from the local area continues to post factual inaccuracies regarding a preservation group related to this theater. All mention of the case for not preserving the building are continually removed. Any mention that questions the validity of the preservation efforts are also removed. Agrajag27 (talk) 15:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Materialscientist (talk) 23:11, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EdwardFlint (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 23:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Dynamic IP adds same spam link. Either temporary semi, or black listing the url should be fine. McSly (talk) 00:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated disruptive editing by sockpuppets.

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:37, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (t) Josve05a (c) 12:11, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC-protected. George Ho (talk) 21:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Greg D. Barnes (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: Retiring account. Greg D. Barnes (talk) 18:15, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Talk page protection for retiring users is not covered under policy. Mike V • Talk 18:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of troublesome IP edits in the last 2-3 weeks, from BLP violations to pure vandalism. May also be a candidate for pending revisions instead. Denniss (talk) 11:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 indef, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden spike in the past week. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:12, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent high level of IP vandalism. —  dainomite   02:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After I put the request up user:IronGargoyle temp semi'd it for three days. Can someone archive this request or something since it was fulfilled. —  dainomite   21:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. by IronGargoyle. Materialscientist (talk) 23:01, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 22:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for one week. → Call me Hahc21 22:35, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: IP editor making significant, drastic and bold changes to article which is a GA status article. Large amounts of information is simply being deleted. He/she will not or is not willing to discuss anything on the talk page. --Dendro†NajaTalk to me! 14:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High levels and no constructive edits. Article had been protected in February for a week, still seems to be a permanent target. Request an extended protection this time. . Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

23 March 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IPs insist on changing information certain and put wrong information regarding the religion of Brazilian journalist.

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 19:25, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Referee made mistake last night givibg red card to wrong persons so now IP and new-reg users change name of this player. QED237 (talk) 15:04, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - filelakeshoe (t / c) 18:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Anons haven't contributed constructively since February 24 (9 unconstructive edits), and lots of vandalism before then. I hate to rope off sections of Wiki, but it seems to be messed up exclusively by anons. No idea why. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 01:12, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 19:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Herald 13:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:JMHamo (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect my Talk page from IPs. JMHamo (talk) 13:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, that is not vandalism; you may ask the IP to stop posting on your talk page and if he continues to in spite of your request, you can report him so that he's blocked, but semi-protection is not warranted. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:48, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of programs broadcast by Boomerang (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. STATic message me! 23:24, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Until 06:32, 26 March 2014 (UTC) which is the same time as the article). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (t) Josve05a (c) 11:45, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:56, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and repeated blanking of content by IP's. It has been persistent for several years. Some DIFFS: [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (I realise that the duration may seem overly short, but this is the first time the article has been semied recently; if disruption resumes after the semi-protection expires, please re-report.) Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:12, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued adding of unsourced or faked information as every year with the MU article of that year. Will continue to after the final.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:19, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection, intricate template. 117Avenue (talk) 04:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakr\ talk / 06:39, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject has been party to a lawsuit in progress regarding sexual harassment allegations. Social media source (Facebook page of a third party) being persistently cited (in edit summary) by unregistered anonymous editors to "break" news on lawsuit without providing references. Nmillerche (talk) 03:41, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's borderline, though, due to the sensitivity of BLP; so if it continues, feel free to re-report. --slakr\ talk / 06:36, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute between users. An open consensus exists on talk page, but edit war continues. 1 month full-protection is necessary to reach consensus, stop edit warring and socks. . Zyma (talk) 03:17, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (both of the other users, by another admin), leaving only you. :P Feel free to re-report if, when their blocks expire, they continue. --slakr\ talk / 06:30, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:John Lennon (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. OccultZone (Talk) 03:12, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked., but if this continues, feel free to re-report. I tend to shy away from having both the article and its talk page semied except when it's a little bit worse. --slakr\ talk / 06:27, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by a disruptive mobile IP hopper. STATic message me! 00:43, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakr\ talk / 05:49, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A SPA has been adding unsupported and off-topic material to the article. The subject mater is unrelated to Gospel music but is related to contemporary worship music and I have informed the editor, but I'm not sure the editor's first language is English so it may not be doing anything. I'm at 3RR so either eyes, a block or protection is required. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakr\ talk / 05:42, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 30 day protection from IPs. An IP hopper who utilizes IPs from Mexico continues to manipulate this article negatively (and other articles, such as United Plankton Pictures). It's unclear if it is maliciousness or ignorance due to language differences, but user continues to remove, with no explanation or rationale, a perfectly useful "format=dmy" template parameter here for example. (The format instructions are at Template:Dts. User has continuously ignored explanations in edit summaries, direct comments and warnings to stop. User also continues to format article sections per their whim, rather than per MOS. In the above referenced edit, user contributes an alleged future movie event without a reference, which contravenes WP:CRYSTAL. User has also edited from 189.159.224.77, 189.237.186.87, 189.159.251.234, etc. So it's a persistent bother that has yet to be remedied through discussion. I speculate that a 30 day protection from IPs may dissuade future attempts. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Cyphoidbomb: First, if it's an issue with a single IP or IP range, a block would be better than semi protecting an article. It appears that the IP made only one more edit after you left a message explaining why his/her edits have been reverted, and I'd like to assume good faith that your message was seen after he/she made that edit. (Given that he/she has stopped making those edits as of now.) I would also encourage you to leave messages on user talk pages instead of in edit summaries. Some users may view it as a passive aggressive approach to handling things. Also, templates are best used in situations where the issue is straightforward (i.e. blatant vandalism). In this case, the user may not understand why the edits are considered disruptive and a more detailed message would be appropriate. As it stands I think things are fine for now, but if the IP keeps making the revisions without partaking in discussion then a block would be in order. Mike V • Talk 01:46, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mike V, I can dig your expectations of AGF, and can also appreciate your suggestion that a range block might be more effective. I suppose I'll go to ANI for that? I would point out though that I'm describing persistent disruption from an individual who has been making the same sorts of edits since circa December 26, 2014, so I'm not sure it's reasonable to assume good faith if they are persistently disruptive, uncommunicative and resistant to warnings. But your points are noted. Regards. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, just realized (hours later) that I'd already reported this to ANI. [79] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And all other templates in Category:United States weatherbox templates; NOAA/NWS updates normals every decade, and given unconstructive, unsourced numerical changes to them by IPs, there is no reason for incompetent IPs to be editing them in the first place. "My master, Annatar the Great, bids thee welcome!" 20:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (both editors, by another admin) --slakr\ talk / 05:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been repeatable targeted by a string of IP addresses whom keeping adding references concerned with the IRA and terrorism. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 19:42, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (by another admin) --slakr\ talk / 05:31, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP initiating edit war. "My master, Annatar the Great, bids thee welcome!" 17:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakr\ talk / 05:28, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous WP:OR and unsourced additions. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:19, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakr\ talk / 05:25, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article has been the object of incredibly persistent and grossly obscene vandalism. After several instances of vandalism, I requested semi-permanent protection, yet a bot lifted the protection, and it has been grossly vandalized almost 20 times in the less than 2 weeks since. I am again requesting semi-permanent protection.Starvinsky (talk) 04:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --slakr\ talk / 05:22, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – When should PC1 be more effective to this page?. George Ho (talk) 21:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined PC is set to expire on it later today, but would like to see if it's still needed (I see a couple good=faiths). Feel free to re-report as things develop. --slakr\ talk / 05:16, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – One month after PC expired. George Ho (talk) 21:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (for now)... but it's borderline, since they do seem to be good-faith for the most part. Feel free to re-report if it continues. --slakr\ talk / 05:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing by IPs and new users. RA0808 talkcontribs 21:19, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and User(s) blocked. due to socks being used to avoid WP:3RR. Feel free to request longer if this continues. --slakr\ talk / 05:06, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and dubious unsourced additions. At the very least the page needs pending changes enabled. STATic message me! 21:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakr\ talk / 04:19, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Currently has many IP editors adding random info as the tournament progresses, often unsourced and simply not true. Quite difficult to police them all, esp. with this tournament being viewed by approx one billion people. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:11, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not seeing frequent enough reverts, plus seeing several beyond-good-faith edits by anons, so I wouldn't personally be comfortable with protecting just yet. Feel free to re-report as needed, though. --slakr\ talk / 04:08, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP vandalism and dubious unsourced additions or WP:OR . STATic message me! 05:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --slakr\ talk / 06:42, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Looks like User:108.6.10.156 is a reincarnation of the sockfarm NYCSlover. The Banner talk 02:43, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --slakr\ talk / 06:12, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Just just prior protection items and began vandalizing several ips. GeorgeMilan / talk 05:57, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --slakr\ talk / 06:45, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (t) Josve05a (c) 23:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --slakr\ talk / 05:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --slakr\ talk / 05:46, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by an anon IP hopper. STATic message me! 20:56, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --slakr\ talk / 05:41, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism for several months (see History and Talk). Multiple unknown IPs keep adding false information to the page (See Talk) Heavydpj (talk) 06:19, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 22:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive edits, vandalism, and addition of original research. – Recollected • 19:35, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Might need to give a once-over since several reverts might not have gotten all of it. --slakr\ talk / 04:13, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalisam, due to high-profiled returns to judging panel. Plus, ignoring rules of Infobox guidelines. livelikemusic my talk page! 23:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 01:27, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Severe recurrent IP vandalism. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 14:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - just one IP several days ago. AlexiusHoratius 21:03, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Herald 12:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - it's like once a week - just revert it. AlexiusHoratius 21:11, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Victim of persistent vandalism compared to very few constructive/non-destructive edits. Receives so little regular editor attention that two images were vandalized out for half a year without anyone batting an eye at the huge blank space left. 8ty3hree (talk) 04:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 20:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. GabeMc (talk|contribs) 22:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note
  • Edit warring has only gone on the past 30 or so hours. Two of the four editors who have reverted are newly registered/IP users--semi protection should suffice. Dan56 (talk) 22:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. John (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: Continual IP vandalism. The last block was for six months and it's still ongoing. 85.210.188.34 (talk) 07:11, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request 3 months protection. Vandalism has started again from multiple sources immediately after previous protection ended (3rd March). Already 5+ incidences. LT910001 (talk) 05:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

24 March 2014

Indefinite template protection: Highly-visible template on several pages related to WP:NC. Also, a redirect to this template {{Wikipedia subcat guideline}} is already permanently protected since 2011. Steel1943 (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected → Call me Hahc21 18:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of an IP user with range 78.* continuously adding a youtube/IMDB link of a fan version of the song, no third party notability or credible information found. IP warned numerous times. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 15:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please don't refer to good-faith additions of material as vandalism, IndianBio. It's a content disagreement. The IP is edit warring, but so are you, and neither of you have posted on the talkpage. Please explain the problem to them in humanspeak rather than posting bitey templates and policy links on their page. They don't look unreasonable to me, more new to Wikipedia, and please note that they haven't edited the article after your second warning on their page. I've fullprotected the article for three days while the two of you hopefully work it out on talk. Bishonen | talk 16:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Semi-protection. Disruptive edits by anon. SlightSmile 23:59, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It still needs more clean-up. Oy veh. Bearian (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address 50.178.92.247 vandalized the article, which he/she used profanity to describe her. IPadPerson (talk) 21:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 15:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I understand that i was engaged in an edit war, and this edit war is the reason why i'm requesting protection. But the other user involved insists on imposing his own version of the article with no willingness to properly discuss or get a consensus for their proposed change. They also seem to think that it is right to revert then discuss. I have repeatedly asked them to avoid this kind behavior but they don't seem to be willing to cooperate. I strongly apologize for edit warring and will certainly refrain from doing so, but this user (along with others who can do the same) should not be encouraged to behave like that. Requesting temporary protection, but also a simple warning to this user. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I accept the warning but also provided it receives.--Panam2014 (talk) 21:43, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected by Hahc21 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (2 weeks) tutterMouse (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:John Lennon (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor warring over project banners. . Binksternet (talk) 20:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by slakr (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (2 days) tutterMouse (talk) 14:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and blanking occur frequently . I think the article should be semi-protected as damage is done by IPs. Zince34' 09:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Top pages of vandalism. Joshua Scheunemann PhD (talk) 03:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits for a week = no reason to protect. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much of fancruft addition and WP:OR going on. Becoming very difficult to revert after every 10 mins. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 15:11, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cindy(talk) 03:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Downgrade protection for template editors. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 21:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined As it's used in the interface. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cindy(talk) 03:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Vandalism. Martin451 22:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The usual Balkan sockpuppetry... a couple of the editor's previous IPs have been blocked, but they're dynamic. bobrayner (talk) 19:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Google Doodle related vandalism. Safiel (talk) 05:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Blocked user(s) returned with anonymous IPs. A full-protection or semi-protection (1 month) is necessary to stop them a solve this endless edit warring. They don't use talk page, just endless reverting. . Zyma (talk) 04:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To prevent the block evasion if they continue making the edits after their blocks expire I'll block them for longer or protect the article. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 04:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article has been the object of incredibly persistent and grossly obscene vandalism. After several instances of vandalism, I requested semi-permanent protection, yet a bot lifted the protection, and it has been grossly vandalized almost 20 times in the less than 2 weeks since. Yesterday, I again requested a protection. An admin banned the user who had been vandalizing the page. However, presumably the same person vandalizing the page created a new profile and is once again vandalizing, writing obscene language, and replacing the article's picture with pornography. I am again requesting semi-permanent protection so this pornographic, obscene vandalism will stop. Starvinsky (talk) 01:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IPs and new users, unsourced BLP material, deliberately false additions such as death date for a living person, etc. Dan56 (talk) 08:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The page is already indefinitely pending changes protected and I don't think there is a high enough frequency of edits to switch to semi protection. Mike V • Talk 19:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: There's a persistent IP campaign to add "Bulbasaur" as an additional spelling of Balthazar's name. I've never seen a contributive IP edit on this page.--Jim in GeorgiaContribsTalk 01:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not long term enough yet to warrant in indef protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unhelpful IP edits that need reverting. Would benefit from full protection for an extended period of time. JMHamo (talk) 20:08, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As there are reverts and approvals of edits on both sides of the two disputes. Please discuss it on the talk page first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

25 March 2014

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – It appears that this page has had a great amount of BLP violations following an incident in his sport. This includes comments that were permanently erased today, and then following from other IP addresses making similar edits. Jeremy112233 (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been hit by multiple IP-vandals today & yesterday. Shearonink (talk) 19:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is being hit by multiple IP-vandals today. Shearonink (talk) 19:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:28, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I nominated this page for PP a few weeks ago (perhaps a bit prematurely), but it has now once again reached a ridiculous stage of vandalism. Many protections have been put on the page, and I think full protection would be very helpful to decrease the vandalism. JZCL 19:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant IP reversions and edit. As a side note, it would seem that the moment protection (that I requested about three weeks ago) went down the edit warring returned almost immediately. Perhaps a longer period than two weeks is necessary. I have attempted to bring some of the IP editors to the table about the names but it seems to be in vain. (Proof my words are not empty) Zero Serenity (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. K6ka (talk | contribs) 16:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:21, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. K6ka (talk | contribs) 16:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:20, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sam Sailor Sing 15:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:19, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced content--as you might imagine, this happens fairly often on conspiracy-related articles. Note also that article has been AFDd. Jinkinson talk to me 15:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. until March 30. AlexiusHoratius 20:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Roving IP adding bogus cast to article, been going on now since March 1. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper and account pushing a pov on an Arab–Israeli conflict issue. Dougweller (talk) 14:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:12, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent POV editing by a block evading IP editor. HelenOnline 13:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. for 6 months for block evasion. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 13:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3 week semi-protection: Repetitive vandalism and "waifu" nonsense: [80] [81] [82]. Subject of the article is currently trending in the news, and the page gets 60,000 daily views, which is double the daily viewer rate of articles such as India. --benlisquareT•C•E 00:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Over the past few days, a couple of anon IPs continually revert to add "Religion: Jewish" to the infobox though the subject's religion has no bearing on his particular notability, and in violation of WP:BLPCAT: "[Infobox c]ategories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief or orientation in question, and the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to their public life or notability, according to reliable published sources." --Tenebrae (talk) 22:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of users adding original research. NeoBatfreak (talk) 17:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone else beat you to the whole "protection" thing there, Neobatfreak. That is, Carrie (2013 film) has been semi-protected indefinitely since last November. Jinkinson talk to me 15:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected.. AlexiusHoratius 20:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LanguageXpert IP and account socks have been all over this article for a while, please semi for a bit in the hopes he gets bored . Darkness Shines (talk) 15:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No point to keep this template protected. 116.48.155.127 (talk) 17:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please ask the protecting admin first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@MSGJ:. 116.48.155.127 (talk) 14:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "Hit and run" style vandalism from unconfirmed WP:SPAs and IP#s. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 13:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Nick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 14:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - High traffic page getting vandalism/Unsourced edits, POV inclusion. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 16:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article is very well developed and sourced. We also have several precedents for this kind of articles: Google search. The confusion strives on the article's title. It should be Political status of Crimea and Sevastopol since both territories are disputed but the dispute is based on the same argument (so there's no point in having one article for each). There are a few related articles but they intrinsically and fundamentally cover different subjects. For example:

Precedents for this includes:

..and so on as demonstrated by the Google search linked above.

We contacted the admin, as you can see at, User talk:Dpmuk#Political status of Crimea, but he preferred to bring the discussion to WP:ANI rather than here.

I hereby formally request the article's unprotection through the proper channel (this page) per the arguments presented before.

—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 09:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's already being discussed on ANI. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What's being discussed at ANI is the conduct of an admin in respect to WP:PREFER, a policy, as "Administrators should not protect or unprotect a page to further their own positions in content disputes.". What's being requested on this page is the article's unprotection based on arguments not related to the admin's behavior. Furthermore, this page is the channel for unprotection requests, not ANI. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 09:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to override the actions of an admin which are currently under review in another forum, please ask that it be unprotected there. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your opinion. Could you please change your !vote to {{disagree}} rather than "declined" as I obviously do not agree with your assessment. I would like to see what other admins have to say about this matter. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 10:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: although I, obviously, consider the protection to be a mistake and an abuse, I agree with Callanecc that it would be procedurally wrong to start yet another review. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed part of Incnis Mrsi's comment as it was uncivil and was casting aspersions. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a vote it's a decision (the same as it would be on WP:UAA or WP:AIV or regarding a WP:CSD. However in the interest of having another pair of eyes I've struck the decline template so the bot won't archive it until another admin declines as well. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:13, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commented at ANI - I'm obvious against unprotection at this time. Dpmuk (talk) 13:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 13:13, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 13:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Jakob (talk) 12:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 indef, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 13:19, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

full protection: Non-notable fictional character, IP and user reverting my edit without providing a significant source, this article have only two sources, which is failed to claim notability. So protect this page as redirect. ChanderForYou 07:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined If another user objects to the redirection you need to nominate it for deletion. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikipelli Talk 12:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Philip Trueman (talk) 12:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support... Mike just plugged this on his radio show as part of a gag (trying to get people to guess his middle name) and this page is going berserk.--WaltCip (talk) 12:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Repeated vandalism on Greenberg's middle name. (Note: Greenberg himself spurred these actions by stating during "Mike & Mike" on March 25, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. ET, that his middle name was not James as listed on Wikipedia. He mentioned that the name began with the initial D, which prompted a guessing game by co-host Mike Golic as well as apparently everyone watching.)   → Michael J Ⓣ Ⓒ Ⓜ 12:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: After about 15 minutes, Greenberg admitted his middle name is Darrow, after attorney Clarence Darrow.   → Michael J Ⓣ Ⓒ Ⓜ 12:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm trying to restore order on the page, but darn it, every time I try, there's edit conflicts. There's been at least a couple of other pieces of vandalism not related to his middle name that have occurred during this fiasco. --GVOLTT How's my editing?\My contribs 12:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary or indefinite semi-protection Constant IP vandalism. Joefromrandb (talk) 04:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would second the indefinite semi-protection request as the article has a long, long history of constant protections against vandalism. I would wager that this will probably be a persistently vandalized page as long as it is present on Wikipedia. He's no longer living, but he's so infamous that this will probably be vandalized for years to come. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Callanecc.. GedUK  12:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protection needed User Riessgo is persistently inserting OR, removing sourced content, ignoring talk page comments of others. Riessgo has (self-)published a book which contains fringe theories he is attempting to insert in this article. He has a long history of this behavior and has not responded to numerous requests to stop. SPECIFICO talk 03:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This one will need to go to WP:ANI as it's a complicated issue which will need to be discussed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. DH85868993 (talk) 01:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: sourced personal stats are regularly vandalised - many months ongoing. Anna (talk) 21:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Three apparent sockpuppets are attempting to remove well-sourced references fom the article. Shritwod (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It looks like they've stopped, if they start up again when the sun comes up in their part of the word please do re-report. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article was previously protected and IPs have moved back on it. Worth mentioning virtually identical articles were created by IPs for the same person on 12 different Wikis. Andrew327 14:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The only IP that has made edits to the page this month has now been properly warned. If they return to the page, a block will be in order. Gloss • talk 14:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per the above comment. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:25, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salt: Article about an Indian student was deleted by an AfD yesterday; its COI creator who declined to take part in the AfD has recreated it twice since, using two sockpuppets. McGeddon (talk) 09:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Closed AfD defaced into an WP:ATTACK page. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's one edit, not enough to semi a page for. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject of this bio was involved in a legal matter which was kept off the article per WP:BLPCRIME until reliable sources reported the outcome, which they have now done. Apparently not acceptable to several IPs who continue to revert the sourced material. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 06:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:13, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by IPs. - Shehanw (talk) 05:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being vandalized to include "Nazi Germany" in the list of countries for some reason. Also reported via OTRS. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing high level of IP vandalism--not surprising given how often people joke about this. Jinkinson talk to me 23:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:19, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple news sources state that the basketball player did not die. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for one week by Zagalejo. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by IPs, some of which are making various personal attacks against Cowan in the comments section. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two month Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing multiple anon IP vandalism, introducing unsourced information. Most are well meaning but need to be removed almost daily. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 03:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see a reason to semi it for 2 months at this stage. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 03:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (sockpuppetry).GreyShark (dibra) 22:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (sockpuppetry).GreyShark (dibra) 22:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —CKY2250 ταικ 16:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (sockpuppetry).GreyShark (dibra) 22:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for two days. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – There have been two issues here. One, a section on pornography continues to be removed by IP addresses despite there being sources. Two there has also been persistent vandalism or promotionalism from SPA accounts, see here 1, 2, and additions of promotionalism here 3. Pending changes may dissuade individuals from breaking BLP policy quite so often. Jeremy112233 (talk) 13:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how 2 months of PC goes first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal at work. I guess to weeks semi will be enough to spoil the fun. The Banner talk 12:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:28, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing persistent vandalism on a controversial subject and controversial person. Kierzek (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Frequent target of banned user Christian2941. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Uncontrolled vandalism by IP addresses. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 23:45, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I've given it 10 days to start with, ping me (or anyone else) if problems recur. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been a slew of IP editors that have been consistently blanking entire sections of the page, removing categories, and general things like it. I request 2 weeks of semi protection in order to hopefully pass this period of vandalism. . Ging287 (talk) 17:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done let us know how it goes afterwards. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: - IP vandalism as every year with that years edition of contests article. Protect until after the 10 May final. --BabbaQ (talk) 15:57, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: What is probably one person operating from several IP addresses has taken to rewriting this article to include fake film and TV roles and/or to be about another person who may or may not exist. -- =) khfan93 (t) (c) 22:20, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive edits, vandalism, unsourced or poorly sourced addition of content, etc. Content disputes also seem to be another problem, with IP editors removing content without explanation. – Recollected • 22:16, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same disruptive anon IP hopping editor that got Survivor Series (2013) and Money in the Bank (2013) protected, along with other instances of vandalism by other IPs and new users. STATic message me! 18:43, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Artichoker[talk] 22:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – One month. EdJohnston (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Last protection request was declined, yet the disruptive anon IP hopper continues edit warring daily. STATic message me! 18:31, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Three months. Edit warring by IP-hopper. Since the last report to this board the IP has kept on going. EdJohnston (talk) 22:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, putting false information into article. IP editors constantly puts false details about the Spyro movie when the official sources linked in the article states otherwise to what they add into the page (movie cancelled officially, but the IP editors repeatedly adds in that the movie is "confirmed to be in the making"). Due to the high traffic page of the Spyro series article, I suggest a constant semi-protection to prevent this kind of thing from happening again. -- Aura24 (talk) 19:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – One month. EdJohnston (talk) 22:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sam Sailor Sing 18:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. FWIW, I have a Bacon number of either 3 or 4 (via Mike Godwin). Bearian (talk) 19:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: maybe 24hours? article rlates to rqapidly developing real-world events, and is subject to many minor changes by IPs and less-well informed but normally well-inentioned editors. Lynbarn (talk) 15:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I have been keeping an eye on this article and there is no reason to protect it. → Call me Hahc21 18:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:58, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The edit warring is just between the two of you. I encourage both of you to discuss the issue on the talk page or it's likely both of you will be blocked for edit warring. Mike V • Talk 15:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

26 March 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Blocked user User:Az-507 returned with IPs (IP-range: 94.180.X.X). The user is currently blocked for 1 week, but still continues his disruptive edits with that IP-range. Endless reverts and changes to cited content. . Zyma (talk) 18:06, 26 March 2014 (UTC) Member did not even read the sources. Lezghins generally someone just added today. Check the sources. Lezgins belong to the Caucasian type. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.180.71.80 (talk) 18:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC) The participant Zyma cancels all in a row without even checking... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.180.71.80 (talk) 18:16, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Dougweller (talk) 19:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular BLP violations. Has twice been protected for three months. John of Reading (talk) 17:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over the long term. JNW (talk) 14:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Please fully protect this sub-page of my user page, so not even I can change it... (t) Josve05a (c) 15:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Mike V • Talk 17:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. --Jakob (talk) 14:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 17:22, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Blanking and voting coming from multiple IP's that seem related to each other in some way... --Mdann52talk to me! 08:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, It seems to be one IP at the moment. The other's !vote seemed genuine, if badly written and formatted GedUK  12:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 08:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, It's one IP, who hasn't edited for two days. If they continue, warn and then report to WP:AIV GedUK  12:53, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 07:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  12:46, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 07:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 09:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: The issue is still under dispute and none of the claimants can be be called dai . The editors Md.et Mufaddalqn are adding direct statements that Mufaddal is the 53d dai. Summichum (talk) 06:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc.. GedUK  12:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent unref contra-cite DOB changes by ip-hopper. Dl2000 (talk) 02:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Per request within user's own space: Also, please indefinitely semi-protect ALL pages with the prefix "User:Lieutenant_of_Melkor/Climate". "My master, Annatar the Great, bids thee welcome!" 07:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected: All of them have an indefinite semi protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:11, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 06:57, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:28, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: The majority of recent edits to this page are vandalism from several IPs (and reverts of vandalism). Barryjjoyce (talk) 00:35, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by the same disruptive IP hopper that got Money in the Bank (2013) protected. . STATic message me! 00:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The same disruptive IP hopper that got Money in the Bank (2013) protected. STATic message me! 00:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:24, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been a single user who has been a confirmed sockpuppet vandalizing, blanking section of the page, and introducing extreme, unsourced content. They have been blocked on so far both of their accounts, but has now taken a liking to just editing using their IP: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=78violet&diff=601258748&oldid=601135173

I propose temporary page protection in order to prevent further vandalism. Thank you. Ging287 (talk) 22:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 09:28, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:05, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: As to not be quickly removed by biased sources. This page uses dictionary definitions, as well as International consensus. მაLiphradicusEpicusთე 22:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Declined The page has been deleted. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Twelve Visions Party (edit | project page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: Off-Wiki campaigning is still bringing new editors here to comment - this could go on for some time!. Dougweller (talk) 08:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Dougweller (talk) 10:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP conflicts by anonymous IP user from Lafayette College. Areaseven (talk) 06:03, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Connormah blocked the IP for good measure as well. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Looking back over the more distant history, I've decided to pending-change-protect it indefinitely as well. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wil encouraged his fans to edit his page as a joke, very short-term protection should suffice. Novusuna talk 02:50, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Lots of vandalism after recent news announcement. Sam Walton (talk) 23:19, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP tries to involve Helmut Kohl's name in current election campaign in Hungary. Requested protection till 6th April. Csigabi (talk) 20:12, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - just one IP, warn them if they are vandalizing and/or get them blocked if they continue. AlexiusHoratius 20:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. K6ka (talk | contribs) 16:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. AlexiusHoratius 20:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Herald 15:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 20:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits. SMS Talk 20:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - only one anon was vandalizing and it looks like he has stopped. AlexiusHoratius 20:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism. Khushank94 (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - only a few instances of vandalism along with good contribs from anons. AlexiusHoratius 20:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP changes to sourced material. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 00:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - some good edits from anons in there as well. AlexiusHoratius 19:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persisent vandalism - IP editor warring over project banners. LucaElliot2 (talk) 17:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 19:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

27 March 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has recently been pelted with vandalism; BLP article has a long history of vandalism. DPH1110 (talk) 18:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistant disruptive edits by IPs for the past couple of weeks likely due to the series ending soon. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Severe edit warring and name calling on talk page. Pending ongoing discussion. Tachfin (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP jumping anon user with persistent unconstructive editing, unable to wp:3RR due to jumping. Edit war incident placed. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Full protection would be not be of greater help. Bearian (talk) 17:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High levels of WP:CRYSTAL edits from IPs adding teams which haven't qualified yet to the list of qualified teams. I've already hit 3RR today reverting such edits. - filelakeshoe (t / c) 15:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP user keeps adding external link to foreign language blog. I haven't been able to apply normal warnings, as IP changes each time the addition is made. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 14:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection -- As with any pop-culture franchise, anon IPs keep coming back to add rumors and uncited claims, with no footnoting or sourcing, but just edit-warring. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SMS Talk 10:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: I request page protection as there is continous edit warring by an uncollaborative editor who has his WP:OWN agenda. QuackGuru (talk) 06:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, If it's one editor, then page protection is not the right solution. Should go to WP:3RRN. Hoever, I'm not sure that it is edit warring. GedUK  13:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Removal of content. OccultZone (Talk) 05:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, This is a content dispute. The IP has started a discussion, you should join that rather than keep reverting. BRD. GedUK  13:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs persistently removing content or adding incorrect or unsourced content. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 22:36, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, can we protect ALL the pages related to the Ukrainian and Crimean crisis? They are all subject to intensive editing, reverting, removing and other disruptive activity by numerous anon IPs (also hordes of newly registered accounts which are most likely sockpuppets of banned or restricted users). It's impossible to constructively edit any of these articles because by the time you spend time making one careful change, two dozen disruptive ridiculous nonsense changes have been made by these accounts in the interim. Volunteer Marek (talk) 22:46, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a (short) list of related articles that also need semi-protection (and please, soon, it's been a mess there for the past couple weeks):
That's just off the top of my head, there's several others - like many the BLPs of the persons related to the conflict. I don't know if it's possible to semi-protect templates, but Template:2014 Crimean crisis infobox and a few other infoboxes are also very much in need of semi-protection. Volunteer Marek (talk) 23:19, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Add Crimea and Crimean Republic to those. DeCausa (talk) 23:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Narendra Modi (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection: since the article is about living person and related to politics , the upcoming elections in April and May in India, is attracting unprecedented addition of informtion (the newspapers source cannot also be taken as a valid source as they can be biased on both ways) , I request the Admins to temporarily full protect the page due to the rate at which information is being added and changed . It also seems will shortly give rise to edit wars between confirmed users too !! Shrikanthv (talk) 07:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. I've looked at both the talk page an the article. I can't see anywhere near enough vandalism on the talk page, and full protection of the article at this stage is unncessary, and I suspect will never happen unless there's an actual edit war. GedUK  13:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 03:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Where? Was this the right link? GedUK  13:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Total Siyapaa (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A few days respite from IP socks of LanguageXpert would be much appreciated . Darkness Shines (talk) 19:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or at least Pending-changes protection:multiple anonymous IP's have been adding false and unsourced content (see history and talk). The intervals between vandalism events are shortening and are becoming more frequent. Request 6 month time period in the hopes that the vandal (or vandals) will tire and move on. If you cannot provide semi-protection, please consider pending-changes protection to allow the information to be reviewed first.Heavydpj (talk) 12:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JNW (talk) 04:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive edits and vandalism. – Recollected • 16:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  12:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

temporary semi-protect certain IPs are attempting to impose a news embargo that Wikipedia has never agreed to be a party to. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:24, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  12:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Since the day that I watched this article, I and other registered users have reverted 99% of edits by IP users as they were introduction of factual inaccuracy, editorializing and WP:IINFO but it seems there is no end to them. e.g. IP users keep sprinkling the article with human names like "MacMillan", "Soap" or "Nikolai" without adding any more information than what I am adding here. Codename Lisa (talk) 02:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. GedUK  13:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism to a BLP. STATic message me! 01:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued removal of plot information by IP users, along with various uncited additions. High profile film that has recently been released. Fandraltastic (talk) 00:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Disruptive editing Anonymous IPs repeatedly inflate U.S. sales and the number of Platinum-certification-award. Perhaps after the page is semi-protected, they will provide sources on the talk page for the change in sales, if at all true.--Harout72 (talk) 22:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP-hopper (sock puppets) (IP-range: 94.180.X.X) targeted this article again and continues his disruptive edits. Please protect this article or an IP-range block is necessary. Zyma (talk) 17:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: ip edit war. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:16, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No, that's an edit war involving IPs and users, not an IP edit war. GedUK  12:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IP vandals. C1776MTalk 10:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (24 hours) tutterMouse (talk) 12:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: 2-3 users edit warring, and at least 2 of them are removing the sourced content, while failing to make legible discussion, can be checked through Talk page. OccultZone (Talk) 14:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Similar to article Mufaddal Saifuddin I request page protection as there is continous edit warring by scrupulous element who seems to promote his own agenda. Mufaddalqn (talk) 13:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. GedUK  12:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: 3 times this morning people have put on a speedy deletion tag - one IP and two brand-new accounts. The article has been here since 2004 and is not an obvious speedy. : Noyster (talk), 09:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IP addresses. BattleshipMan (talk) 14:32, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:disruptive vandalism by two IP users. Seqqis (talk) 23:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Discospinster. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 01:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits for around 3 days. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – On-and-off Kelis-related vandalism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGL2rytTraA. Jinkinson talk to me 21:35, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 22:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP trying to whitewash biography, removing well-cited negative information. Binksternet (talk) 19:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many IP editing against talkpage consensus and general WP:FOOTY consensus not to change nation until player played for new team. QED237 (talk) 00:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of programs broadcast by Boomerang (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Same IP hopper returned after protection period ended. STATic message me! 00:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection: IPs persistently adding that the subject has won the Malvern College "Pizza award" for eating the most pizzas. The subject is a minor European royal currently at a UK private school, Malvern College. Some of the IPs making the edits are registered to the college, with edit summaries like "It's true, I and about 60 students saw it happen". Clearly the Prince's friends are having a "hilarious" time adding it, but if it happened it hasn't made it to reliable sources. Suggest being semied for a few weeks until they get bored. DeCausa (talk) 23:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There isn't enough activity for semi protection, but I can justify pending changes protecting it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: For template editors to edit. Steel1943 (talk) 22:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition by a morphing IP of an unsourced piece of OR - "Kay turbine". Partial translation from German is too poor to work on it further. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent non-constructive edits by IP user. On a regular basis, an IP user comes in and adds the same material that has been removed multiple times before due to a number of reasons including but not limited to notability. The IP user edits around 5 articles Paul R. Wharton High School, Paul R. Wharton High School, Lakeland Senior High School (Florida), and Manatee High School.Jacona (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent non-constructive edits by IP user. On a regular basis, an IP user comes in and adds the same material that has been removed multiple times before due to a number of reasons including but not limited to notability. The IP user edits around 5 articles Paul R. Wharton High School, Paul R. Wharton High School, Lakeland Senior High School (Florida), and Manatee High School.Jacona (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent non-constructive edits by IP user. On a regular basis, an IP user comes in and adds the same material that has been removed multiple times before due to a number of reasons including but not limited to notability. The IP user edits around 5 articles Paul R. Wharton High School, Paul R. Wharton High School, Lakeland Senior High School (Florida), and Manatee High School.Jacona (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent non-constructive edits by IP user. On a regular basis, an IP user comes in and adds the same material that has been removed multiple times before due to a number of reasons including but not limited to notability. The IP user edits around 5 articles Paul R. Wharton High School, Paul R. Wharton High School, Lakeland Senior High School (Florida), and Manatee High School.Jacona (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent non-constructive edits by IP user. On a regular basis, an IP user comes in and adds the same material that has been removed multiple times before due to a number of reasons including but not limited to notability. The IP user edits around 5 articles Paul R. Wharton High School, Paul R. Wharton High School, Lakeland Senior High School (Florida), and Manatee High School.Jacona (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over the long term.

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

28 March 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalised often and frequently, one of the most vandalised pages of Wikipedia. EthicallyYours! 13:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:20, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection High level of IP vandalism. examples- [83] ,[84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89] are some and many more. -Khushank94 (talk) 12:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:18, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Well-meaning but disruptive IP edits for over a week. They are now removing categories and link to wiktionary as "OR", so I give up trying to talk sense. Mezigue (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:15, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Gloss • talk 04:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have calmed down; re-request if necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Ip'S. Shrikanthv (talk) 11:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs from 122.168.* have been regularly removing a number of seemingly relevant bluelink entries from this page's list, with no explanation, recently. McGeddon (talk) 09:46, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:14, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs edit warring. Geraldo Perez (talk) 09:38, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:13, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 07:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much advertising by similar accounts, possibly sockpuppets. . Zince34' 05:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:10, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP article undergoing a rash of vandalism. DPH1110 (talk) 04:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:09, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple attempts at vandalism from several IP editors over the last month. > 7 attempts. LT910001 (talk) 04:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism returns following the end of protection period yesterday. STATic message me! 01:37, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:05, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To prevent unregistered users from committing vandalism. Vjmlhds 22:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See delete log. EthicallyYours! 06:31, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 06:40, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect due to disruptive editing that needs reverting. JMHamo (talk) 20:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Closed RfC. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, we don't protect pages just because they're no longer in use, and one incident of vandalism doesn't rally necessitate protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protection: The parent template of this sub-template has already been set to template-protection level. I'm working on changes to the visibility of {{Orphan}} messages, and these templates are used together. Discussion at Template talk:Orphan. – Wbm1058 (talk) 00:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:18, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Ip edit warring . Hell in a Bucket (talk) 22:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive editing by Rightman5 (talk · contribs), replacing one entry for another (initially without a WP:Reliable source); has now taken to obvious WP:Sockpuppetry as Jamietee32 (talk · contribs). Flyer22 (talk) 21:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, for now; they seem to be trying to egage in discussion. Come back if you don't get anwhere with that. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, HJ Mitchell, Rightman5 has stated on my talk page that Jamietee32 is not his or her WP:Sockpuppet; however, as noted in that discussion, because of an off-Wiki communication, more people may follow them and WP:Disrupt the Trans man article. Jamietee32 is currently being WP:Disruptive, including with regard to this report; latest attempt is here. Flyer22 (talk) 23:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's a moot point now:
Already protected by administrator IronGargoyle.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template {Chembox} subtemplates

Request template protection (TE). First three are new subtemplates of {{Chembox}} (the infobox for chemicals). Fourth is semi-protected from a 2010 discussion (I did not research that; today we have TE and I expect no exception from the high-transclusion criteria we use when looking at these). {Chembox} itself has 9700 transclusions, the listed templates are expected or sure to reach 8000+. I edited and created the new {chembox} situation. -DePiep (talk) 21:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TheMesquito (talk) 20:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ronhjones.. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A series of IPs insist on adding images about a particular individual which are incongruous with the individual and the article. Seems to be a concerted attempt to promote an individual beyond that which is required. Leaky Caldron 19:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of WP:NOT content by IP editors. SMS Talk 19:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple SPAs inserting defamatory material. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection Anonymous school-based editor is removing references without reason. In the alternative, block the editor for at least 30 hours (i.e. the rest of the school week). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, given this edit summary, block the user until school is out for the week (USA time zone). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – After his block end User Enok started again his edit warring, reverting against consensus and refusing to comply with WP:STATUSQUO. Therefore, I am asking page protection again as suggested by User:Slakr on this page during last request. N.B. Last week, instead of the requested page protection, User Enok was blocked for 48 hours. Alex2006 (talk) 08:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. Again. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

29 March 2014

Semi-protection: Possible continuation of the IP vandalism that has plagued this article for the past two months--newest IP is likely a sock puppet of the previous IPs, THE GTA Guy, AlisaJay--all of whom vandalized the same material being edited now, and all of whom are suspected socks of MariaJaydHicky. Dan56 (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Possible continuation of the IP vandalism that has plagued this article for the past two months--newest IP is likely a sock puppet of the previous IPs, THE GTA Guy, AlisaJay--all of whom vandalized the same material being edited now, and all of whom are suspected socks of MariaJaydHicky. Dan56 (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This page was originally semi-protected due to edit warring between IP users, where a group of users kept adding unconfirmed future opening dates without citing a reliable source. As soon as the protection expired this activity has resumed. I am requesting a one month semi-protection (by then, both dates that keep being added by IP users will have passed). The IP users adding the dates can register or bring the discussion to the talk page. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until 1 May. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bahooka (talk) 18:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 16:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing general vandalism (The Cavalier King Charles Spaniel is a staple food of coyotes in US... and such...). . Hafspajen (talk) 16:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:09, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit warring see page history. »Petiatil († talk ‡ contribs) 04:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism to a BLP. STATic message me! 03:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. 76.242.176.0/20 blocked for a week. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP violations.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 15:57, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The same disruptive edits for which it was protected earlier still continues after the last protection expired, with a bit lengthy intervals this time. SMS Talk 13:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One individual with many IPs seems to take an unhealthy long-term interest in the article, and this is a less violent measure than a range block IMO. Bishonen | talk 14:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Please lower protection level to  Template editor and remove from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items so that I may respond to the current edit request. Thank you. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 12:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Technical 13, can you see how it's included on cascade-protected items? I'm guessing it's used in one of the other templates listed there, but I can't see which at a glance. If you can point me to it, I'll remove it (unless there's a very good reason that whatever is calling it needs to be left there). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:15, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
{{RFPP|nu}}. For the bot. I'll be happy to lower it to TE once you've figured out how to get it off CASC. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. @Technical 13: I substituted {{notice}} on User:DYKadminBot/REMOVE_THIS_LINE, which has removed it from WP:CASC. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prime target of Malaysian IP hopper obsessed with adding cast members of The Wolverine to other film articles. Areaseven (talk) 13:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes privilege by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 07:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was unprotected a few days ago and has already been receiving a lot of negative, disruptive, IP attention. Gloss • talk 05:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not many reason for this page to be edited, it seems that ~ 80% of it's history is vandalism. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 11:07, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Unfortunately it doesn't look so much like vandalism as cluelessness from registered accounts (new editors who don't know what a category page is for), which is even harder to handle, because they may return when autoconfirmed. But I hope the semi will help. Bishonen | talk 11:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and repeated introduction of unsourced information or the changing of things not stated in the sources cited. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:21, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:27, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 05:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:08, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User request on users own userspace. (t) Josve05a (c) 23:34, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, this is a wiki. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – to prevent a full scale conflict. The Banner talk 22:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, knock it off. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant POV-pushing and adding of irrelevant info about the Darwin-family by IP, who is getting very unfriendly. The Banner talk 21:28, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent IP additions of unsourced content. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 00:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gloss • talk 00:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:04, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See here: http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/toronto2014election/2014/03/28/election_2014_olivia_chow_deletes_the_most_facebook_comments.html (some of the more defamatory Facebook comments may end up on Wikipedia). Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 14:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently, there has been a slew of editors, mostly IP users who are editing out well cited material and one had even removed a section of the talk page elaborating on why editors of this page may have to watch out for vandalism. I respectfully request semi protection in order to hopefully pass this period of vandalism. Ging287 (talk) 22:15, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:59, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi-protection for at least 2 weeks: High volume of vandalism in the last 48 hours. The article (and the vandalism to it) was mentioned on the television program Around the Horn pbp 21:06, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – highly visible BLP, subject to IP Edit warring. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:34, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:48, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Anon IP editor has resorted to IP hopping to edit war. STATic message me! 16:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:46, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent disruptive edits by IPs unwilling to discuss their changes on the Talk page. Aldebaran66 (talk) 15:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Semi because the problem is with IPs. Orlady (talk) 21:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-and-off vandalism and/or spamming by new accounts and IPs. Jinkinson talk to me 14:26, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 18:00, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

30 March 2014

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP jumping editor keeps adding to the lead section a claim about another rapper using vodoo to hinder the careers of the article subjects. Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 16:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection ended yesterday, and the vandalism started again almost immediately. Sjö (talk) 12:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 16:32, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism (including a newly-registered user). --Sundostund (talk) 22:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't tell what's going on there. Sundostund, could you provide a more detailed explanation please? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this article suffered IP vandalism for some time, but today an IP (83.233.187.98, his edit history - [90]) came in and started adding incorrect data to the article. Later, he registered as Facts71 (his edit history - [91]), and continued adding incorrect data to this article and some other articles (especially Ziaur Rahman)... I just didn't want to engage in an edit war with him, so I reported it here and also at ANI. --Sundostund (talk) 01:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sundostund, Could you provide a few diffs and explanations of what's unconstructive/inaccurate about them? It's not that I don't believe you, I just need you to help me see it for myself. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:26, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As for diffs, I don't know which one to single out, he made many edits as IP and as user... For instance, he listed Ziaur Rahman as first head of state of Bangladesh, instead of Mujibur Rahman. That was a stable version, which stood until today, and then he changed it. --Sundostund (talk) 01:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, I hope you'll be able to help somehow here, I really don't want to see this thing turning into an edit war... --Sundostund (talk) 01:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: In the couple of years I have had this article on my watchlist, the majority of the changes I have seen have been either vandalism or reverts of vandalism. While my irritation may have led me to exaggerate, and it just seems that way to me, still, I have just tallied up the number of edits that were vandalism over the past 100 edits, and they total over 30, to judge by those edits that were reverted as such. Over the past 500 edits, a rough estimate is that a quarter to a third have been the work of vandals, most, though not all of them, anonymous IP users. A search shows that it has been seven years since semi-protection was applied to this page. It is about time for it to be considered again. --Alan W (talk) 04:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected. Favonian (talk) 10:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since protection was lifted on the 25th. czar ♔ 01:17, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@HJ Mitchell: To clarify, the protection looks like three months, not six czar ♔ 01:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oops That'll teach me to edit at 2am! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The article has been continuously protected since October 2009, perhaps it's time to try something like pending changes. The protecting admin, User:Prodego, has been inactive lately. eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:38, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs adding incorrect information in the wake of a report that a sequel will not be made. Elizium23 (talk) 00:41, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This page is recently the subject of repeated anonymous unsourced edits to the infobox. It should be protected for a period of at least one week, as this is the subject of WP:FANCRUFT vandalism by railfans. Epicgenius (talk) 00:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism in which an edit 75.120.XXX.XXX keeps altering the names in the article so the information is incorrect.

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring. – S. Rich (talk) 19:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note the previous RPP was declined because it was read as an issue for the ANI. At this point there is edit warring going on. Recommend 1 or 2 weeks of protection so that the interested editors can go to Dispute Resolution. – S. Rich (talk) 20:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:11, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See recent edits. GoldRock23(talk - my page - contribs) 16:57, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I'm not actually requesting complete unprotection. Twinkle doesn't seem to have an option to just request cascade protection to be removed. This template has already been lowered to  Template editor protection level but TEs still can't edit because it is transcluded from Steve Martin (not sure why that has the cascading option on) and Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items. I would like to be able to add a .tag-cn class to all instances of this template as an anchor so that people can customize how they see the text as the full wording can be obtrusive to reading. Experienced editors should have a way to modify this tag (I personally would make it bigger, but others may make it smaller). Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 21:34, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. The highly visible nature of this template and its widespread use across the project (on over a quarter of a million pages) mean that changes really must be discussed first and a consensus reached. Given how small and uncomplex the template is, this isn't a matter of technical skill trumping everything else, it's a matter of determining (or establishing) consensus and not rushing in headlong with drive-by edits—that's what we elect admins for. For he record, there are a fair number of admins whose judgement I have my reservations about, but when it comes to editing templates, most of the have the sense to leave well enough alone. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • @HJ Mitchell and Technical 13: After we implemented the template editor right the majority of fully-protected templates still couldn't be edited because they needed to be manually lowered. That is, although we had the new permission implemented, it was rather less than useful because the very reason for the implementation was still being frustrated until we went through the slog work of making fully-protected templates editable by those with the new flag. So I started that slog work, mass lowering fully-protected templates, thinking it was only a matter of willingness to spend the time, and not a matter of agreement of whether we should or should not do it. Then some users who noticed my edits said we shouldn't mass lower yet, until we had some agreement on that as well, so I stopped. This is one of the ones I lowered while I was doing a ton. I never noticed it was cascade protected. So, my lowering of it (uselessly, given that it's cascade protected) should not be taken as my endorsement of removing cascading protection. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your comment. I'll mention my request in the current discussion that I wanted to make this edit to assist in and see if I can build a consensus before coming back again. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 13:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

31 March 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: This page requires permanent semi-protection due to frequent poor edits by unregistered users. Mezigue (talk) 19:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs are repeatedly vandalizing this page, and worse some of the edits stood for a way too long. E.g.

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: One user has three times created this WP:CSD A10 page in Bosnian. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:30, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive edits and vandalism. – Recollected • 17:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated Vandalism efforts by unregistered & unverified annonymous IP address. Semi-Protection mandated to preserve legitimacy of content

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:37, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User:Nicclllltyyy has added unsourced claims that Kendall was dating a specific person. He/she has done this twice today and has been notified on their talk page. Also, IP address 109.144.209.153 has removed information on Kendall's television appearances without explaining why. They have also been warned on their talk page about that. IPadPerson (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping editor is pushing the same non-neutral edits in the lead. czar ♔ 13:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon operating from various IPs, one of which was blocked (though not preventing further vandalism as they changed IP address), has been persistently adding the fake royal Princess Hugette of Wales. BethNaught (talk) 08:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 71.169.128.0/19 rangeblocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:58, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Shifting IP edit-warrior ignoring WP:TVINTL and trying to list every network that ever screened the show. McGeddon (talk) 14:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a wek, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. User:Horde 00 specifically created account in response to a post on the IP address page User talk:99.234.163.129 that said user was using to add content to the article that wasn't relevant and was either unsourced or using unreliable sources. Request that the article be fully protected indefinitely without disputed content. At this point, if anything needs to be added to the article, it can be suggested on its talk page. Jgera5 (talk) 07:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] 

                                      Response by Horde_00:

I am including information that is very relevant, accurate, but inconvenient for certain sports fans to read. However, attempting to "erase" facts and history is completely opposite to the function of Wikipedia and should not be tolerated. I am willing to come to a compromise in the wording of the facts, but am resolute in my intention to present the facts to readers. I think Wikipedia will and should agree that acknowledging history, truth and facts are the founding principle of this website.

Here is the link to the Terrible Towel talk page, for some background on the disputed topic. The "Let's just keep the Ravens Super Bowl run out of the article." claim by the user is particularly questionable:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Terrible_Towel#Terrible_Curse

Furthermore, I wish to present the facts:

Fact a.) The Baltimore Ravens defeated the rival Pittsburgh Steelers on November 18, 2012. Ray Rice, Running Back for the Baltimore Ravens disrespectfully walked off the field with his teammates singing/humming "Renegade" by Styx (de facto rally song of the Steelers), waving a Terrible Towel (longtime symbol of the Steelers) and wearing it on his head.

Here are links to credible sources to back up those facts:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000098218/article/lamarr-woodley-warns-ray-rice-over-terrible-towel http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2012/11/20/steelers-terrible-towel-rice/1716767/ http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/20/ray-rices-terrible-towel-usage-upsets-lamarr-woodley/

Fact b.) The Baltimore Ravens won Super Bowl XLVII on February 3, 2013.

Here are links to credible sources to back up those facts:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_XLVII http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/47 http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/03/us/sports-super-bowl/index.html

These are the facts, and they are indisputable. I respectfully request to Wikipedia that you review the facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horde 00 (talk • contribs) 08:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Horde_00 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horde 00 (talk • contribs) 07:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, try talking to them. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – Page has been subject to recent copy and paste moves without discussion. C679 05:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, move-protection is useless against c&p moves. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – WP:OR and information contradicting WP:RS being inserted. Elizium23 (talk) 01:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, only on editor; report them to an appropriae noticeboard (perhaps ANI). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After previous 5-day protection expired, vandalism promptly resumed. Jinkinson talk to me 14:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and BLP violations from IPs and new editors, of recent weeks. ——MelbourneStar☆talk 12:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistant vandalism from anon IPs. Richiekim (talk) 12:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject has been arrested for possession of child pornography, but per WP:BLPCRIME it's not yet appropriate to include this information. Several anonymous editors have done so, and at least one edit of this sort has already been hidden via oversight. ~TPW 11:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant unexplained edits by ips. Blackknight12 (talk) 11:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 11:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Repeated deletion of template against consensus. Two IPs one autoconfirmed. Jim1138 (talk) 07:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated joke edit to page by multiple users, caused by linking to a Reddit thread. Silvrous Talk 09:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 06:58, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, no activity for 6 hours; presumably you're asleep or you're working out your differences on the talk page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry, protection clash. GedUK  11:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Essentially the same reason as 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine request below.Volunteer Marek (talk) 00:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article was recently semi-protected for 24 hrs [115]due to disruptive activity by IP editors. As soon as the protection expired this activity immediately resumed. A longer period (basically as long as the conflict is ongoing) protection is needed. I'd also like to reiterate my call to semi-protect ALL Ukraine/Crimea related articles (per original link given above).Volunteer Marek (talk) 00:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by FreeRangeFrog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uncletomwood (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:52, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article about a currently popular open source web game is attracting a lot of IP edits adding links to their own or their favourite spinoffs, sometimes replacing the official game URL. McGeddon (talk) 10:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: On November 16th, February 1st, and February 28th, User:121.44.113.149 engaged in brief editing sprees at this disambiguation page, each of which were reverted. On February 28th, the page was protected for 30 days, expiring about 2 days ago. This evening, the same IP arrived at the article and removed all but one subject from the list, citing the fact that "subject has been deleted". Thereafter, the IP deleted references to other Andrew Slatterys in other articles around Wikipedia, until they received several warning templates from CVU members patrolling RC. At this point, they made an account, and replied to the warning templates with [116]. The newly-made account then immediately put a CSD template on this disambiguation page, citing the fact that it now contained reference only to one subject. Because the user had deleted the rest of its content.

I've just removed the CSD template, and engaged the user on their talk page. I suspect this is going to be a slow, delicate process, wherein several article edits will need to be reverted, and I'd like to be absolutely sure that it doesn't escalate. Once this page is protected, we can begin restoring the content of other affected articles. Meanwhile, I'll keep talking with this user. --Moralis (talk) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, for now; if they're engaging, it's best to not to upset things if you're making progress. Come back if you don't get anywhere. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SFK2 (talk) 02:22, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. and Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 02:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and unconstructive edits by IP and newly registered editors. This page seems to be the main flashpoint between pro-Russia and pro-Ukraine partisans on Wikipedia, and it is being vandalized several times a day by editors from one faction or another. -Kudzu1 (talk) 19:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:07, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect against continuous IP off-topic edits. At least for certain period. --Catflap08 (talk) 19:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Flyer22 (talk) 19:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 19:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. --Sternschläger (talk) 18:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (t) Josve05a (c) 15:55, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:52, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. --Sundostund (talk) 15:29, 30 March 2014

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. --Sundostund (talk) 15:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Aftab1995 (talk) 14:06, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit conflict over language resumed just after protection was lifted. Areaseven (talk) 12:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:47, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editor(s) have been repeatedly adding unsourced controversial information on this BLP. obi2canibetalk contr 12:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: A consensus to remove the "race title" column from the article has been achieved. However, editors opposed to this consensus have taken to declaring the arguments in favour of deleting the column - and therefore the consensus - are void simply because they disagree with them. As those editors have done this on two previous occasions in unrelated arguments, I am requesting full protection for one week. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 10:18, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of repeated, persistent vandalism from multiple IP editors over many years. LT910001 (talk) 06:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for one week to start. The article has never been protected before, so we start out small. Please re-report if the activity resumes when the protection wears off. Diannaa (talk) 19:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Abdel Fattah el-Sisi (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: There have been an absurd amount of edit requests by floating IPs and unregistered users in the last 48 hours. Many edits have been in Arabic, and [117] suggests possible BLP issues. I hesitate to protect both the article and the talk page, but this may be an instance where it's necessary. --ElHef (Meep?) 02:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Archive/2014/03&oldid=1161446376"