Talk:Ullr
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Father
[edit]Who is father of Ullr? His mother is Sif, but Thor is not his father. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.86.230.114 (talk) 08:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this information is not provided by surviving sources. :bloodofox: (talk) 15:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Asterisk
[edit]It is questionable whether we should mark the Common Germanic form as unattested, *Wulþuz. It is true, we don't have the normalized wulþuz in runic, but we do have owlþu, read as wolþu, which is considered its equivalent. There was no orthography in the 3rd century. dab (𒁳) 11:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Not glory
[edit]Not glory but Ull ~ *Wulþuz ~ wealth. It should have been obvious. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 20:00, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, that is the same word root. Glory, Honour, Wealth, Worthy, and many many more are connected to the same root. Compare the etymology of "worth" and "wealth". Alpharts Tod (talk) 15:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Thorpe's translation
[edit]In the Poetic Edda section, the credit tag "– Thorpe's translation" after the English translations was on the same line as the last line of text. As the reader first encounters it, it seems as if it should be part of the text, which is confusing -- especially if the browser window is too narrow for the full width of the lines. I've taken it off the three fragments and credited Thorpe in the first para. --Thnidu (talk) 22:23, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ullr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050520075332/http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/OMACL/DanishHistory/ to http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/OMACL/DanishHistory/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Ullrshof
[edit]I'm curious what the translation as "church" is based on, it should mean "ullr's court" as in the household of a king or a judicial court.
In German it could also mean "yard" as in a farm (also "Bauernhof") built around an enclosed yard with the buildings forming an U or O around the working place in the middle and is related to "Hufe", the piece of farmland a single farmer owned in a village or town, but those words seem to never have formed in swedish. 62.143.204.230 (talk) 12:53, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Ullinshof
[edit]It is a debated topic in archeology, however, there is a consensus that the Norse religion did not generally have temples, but rather was practiced in halls and nature. Therefore i think it is misleading to call it a temple, as Hoff can also mean hall. 2001:464C:3CE:0:6847:EE55:D1E9:FA25 (talk) 14:39, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- I've changed, leaving it unstranslated as "hof" and linked it to "Heathen hof". It isn't ideal as I think the Heathen hof page should discuss the semantic ambiguity more but I think it is an improvement as I do see your point. What do you think? Ingwina (talk) 16:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC)