User talk:Aurorion

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Aurorion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! MuffledThud (talk) 09:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alumni of Indian Institute of Management Calcutta

Hello. Please note that there's already a Category:Indian Institute of Management Calcutta alumni, which is consistent with the other subcategories of Category:Indian Institutes of Management alumni, and with alumni categories generally on Wikipedia. Would you mind if I marked the surplus (and now empty) category Category:Alumni of Indian Institute of Management Calcutta for deletion? Thanks, MuffledThud (talk) 10:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Your addition to Fellow Programme in Management has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://www.iimcal.ac.in/programs/FPM/index.asp Whpq (talk) 14:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Whpq: Yes, I copied the information from the website. I am a student of the concerned institution, and though I am not a member of the Internet Solutions Group (which manages the website, referred to in the credits page of the website), I am pretty sure they would not mind me using this information for this purpose, which I assume can be considered to be fair use. So, I do not think there is any issue in retaining the information that I had added. If you would like, I could get one of my friends in the ISG to copy and paste the information, but really, is all that trouble worth it? Oh, and the information really does not contain any top secret material, it's just information material regarding an educational programme.--Aurorion (talk) 14:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Wikipedia, nor you are are the copyright owner of the material. You cannot merely assume that they would give permission to release this material under a CC-BY-SA. The website very clearly states "(c) 2008 Indian Institute of Management Calcutta. All rights reserved." You could ask then to donate the copyrighted text to Wikipedia, but quite frankly, it is unlikely to be acceptable material for an encyclopedia article. -- Whpq (talk) 14:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leena Chatterjee

The article Leena Chatterjee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable per WP:ACADEMIC, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources, sole secondary source cited is a business magazine listing her as part of a profile of several academics.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Leena Chatterjee

I have nominated Leena Chatterjee, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leena Chatterjee. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MuffledThud (talk) 17:14, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Indian Institutes of Management has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join the WikiProject Education in India

- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Education in India - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hi, Aurorion, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Indian Education ! The WikiProject Indian Education is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Indian Education System(Schools,Colleges and Universities).
As you have shown an interest in article related to Education in India we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.Thank you for your contributions.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

naveenpf (talk) 14:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mukesh moved

Hello! I would like to know why the article Mukesh was moved from its title Mukesh to Mukesh Mathur without any discussion with other editors? -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 23:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I reached that article when searching for another Mukesh. The article itself says that the person's name is Mukesh Mathur, and it's not mentioned that he is called mononymously as "Mukesh" - so isn't it standard practice to have the article's title as the first+last names of the subject? Why would the article be titled just "Mukesh"? Aurorion (talk) 07:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We go by WP:COMMONNAME. The singer is known by his single name alone. I doubt anyone knows he is Mathur. I myself didnt realize it untill you moved. All his movies credit him by his single name. Hence adding his surname is quite confusing. When we search Mukesh, we now reach a disambiguation page. Most people searching Mukesh would want to read about this singer. Thats the reason no one had moved it till now. Btw, which Mukesh were you looking for? The South-indian actor? -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 09:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Best option is Mukesh (singer). The dab page does not list out any other person with the profession. But it would be better if you followed WP:RM#Requesting a single page move. X.One ^SOS 10:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support: That's more logical. Please discuss on the talk page for the reference than here. Thanks. - Vivvt^Talk 10:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The WP article does not mention that the person is known by his single name alone - it just mentions the full name. Articles of people who are known by only one name usually mentions this in the opening itself (examples: 1, 2, 3). So I thought this article was erroneously named as "Mukesh", hence changed it. In retrospect, I should have followed WP:RM#Requesting a single page move so I apologize. In light of this new info, I agree with the view above that the best option is "Mukesh (singer)". Will add the first-name info of the singer to the opening line of the article and use WP:RM to propose the move. Aurorion (talk) 12:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Make further comments here. BollyJeff || talk 12:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mukesh (singer) is definitely the best option. Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly discuss this topic here: Talk:Mukesh Mathur#Requested_move. - Aurorion (talk) 16:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

your recent edit to Godhra train burning

Hi Aurorion,

You very recently introduced a POV tag to the above article saying there are "controversies" about the incident which must be honored before the matter is fully resolved by law. I would like to bring to your notice that the same (court verdicts) has already happened, most notably the Feb-March 2011 Gujarat HC rulings on the matter last year. The courts have decisively ruled that:

1. The incident was a preplanned conspiracy hatched a few days in advance by local radical Muslims of the Signal Fadia area near Godhra railway station, and specifically a conspiracy to target karsevaks. The court has mentioned in its case closure judgment statements that the train burning incident was NOT either (1) an accident or (2) provoked by any act of the passengers in that train when passing through Godhra. See:

[1]
[2]

2. Furthermore, the court convicted 31 persons 11 of whom were given capital punishment. See:

3. The Gujarat HC had earlier already termed the Banerjee one-man committee (started by Lalu Prasad Yadav as railway minister just after UPA came to power in 2004 and just before elections in his home state Bihar) as illegal, unconstitutional and politically motivated and also ruled that the findings of the Banerjee committee (which said it could have been accident instead of conspiracy) were null and void.

This is pretty decisive by all respects. BTW, the article does give lots of space to the alternative controversies and Banerjee committee and its findings etc in the article content and text anyway ... the lead and intro section, obviously, must be short and stick to facts. 202.3.77.183 (talk) 12:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - please see my reply on the Talk page of the article. Aurorion (talk) 18:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Institutes of Management

I am not going to keep watching Indian Institutes of Management, it seems in rather good hand. However, one edit you made seems counter policy to me. Per WP:LEAD, the lead should define the topic and summarize the body of the article. Since the IIMs are not defined by the courses, moving this material is quite against what the lead is supposed to be. The material should remain in an academics section, and only summarized in the lead. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 19:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - thanks for your message. I added the Programmes info to the intro because this section was quite short, and I felt the intro also was too brief. I plan to expand the Academics into a larger section with more information when I get the time, so will see about removing/shortening the current Acads info from the lead. Please feel free to improve the article in the meanwhile. Thanks. Aurorion (talk) 16:34, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I don't have much time these days so I try to focus on articles which don't have the attention of other editors. My first improvement to the article would have been to revert the edit in which you moved the academics to the lead, but I find that sometimes reverting leads to antagonism, while discussion leads to improvement. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 19:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to 12:28, 23 February 2012 (diff | hist) Indian Institutes of Management ‎ (→Institutes: The regular executive PGP programme has already been mentioned earlier, no need to specify it again. the Public management programme is unique to IIMA and hence is especially notable.)

Please note that the PMP programme is no longer existing at IIM Ahmedabad since the 2009-10 batch — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandeep076 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sandeep076, thanks for your message. But are you sure of this? The programme is still listed on the IIMA website. Do you have any references for the ending of the programme? Aurorion (talk) 12:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The website is outdated. It is a fact that the programme has been discontinued after 2009. A call to the institute would confirm this. Unfortunately there are no online references available/traceale but if you notice the admission dates and form etc.. they all are for older years. Sandeep076(talk)

My edits on the Narendra Modi page

Hello - I see that you have repeatedly removed two edits I made to the page. Can you please explain why, when I had provided 4 high-quality sources to support that edit? Please discuss on the Talk page of the article. Thanks. Aurorion (talk) 21:19, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:BLP, WP:LEAD and WP:UNDUE before making such edits on a biographical article. The lead section is not a place for speculation and allegations. Modi was also recently cleared by a committee appointed by the Supreme Court. Suggest you take this to the talk page of the article, where this can be discussed and addressed by other editors too. I also recommend that you do not take editing biographical articles lightly and understand policies and guidelines adequately before re-adding contentious material about a living person. Thank you. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 21:23, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Nearly Headless Nick, the lead section is clearly not for info about controversies, it can be added in the body carefully, if there are similar sources available. --07:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)--kondi ^{talk/contribs} 07:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indra Nooyi

That was my mistake, thanks for reverting it. I was reading the news and ran across that article, and I guess I read a little too much into it. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:10, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My edits on the Godhra train burning page

Hi! Aurorian - I see that you have removed edit I made to the page. Can you please explain why, when I had provided several high-quality sources to support that edit? Please discuss on the Talk page of the article. As per wikipedia policy, You are free to add more facts and enhance the article.Thanks. Unbiasedpov (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.1.8 (talk) 13:37, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Manreet Sodhi Someshwar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I have protected the article N. R. Narayana Murthy again, and I am attempting to mediate a resolution on the talk page of the article. Since you have been involved in editing this article, I ask you to join the discussion so that a consensus can form. I'm sending this notice to all recent editors. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 23:55, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amish

Thanks a lot to you for these changes. The article has really become a load of crap. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:02, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The article surely needs a lot of improvement, happy to help out! Aurorion (talk) 12:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign

Please sign here Talk:Narendra Modi --sarvajna (talk) 11:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, missed it. Isn't User:SineBot working? Anyway, added it now. Thanks! Aurorion (talk) 12:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Narendra Modi's Google+ Hangout

Hello, Aurorion. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narendra Modi's Google+ Hangout.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Anbu121 (talk me) 08:42, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HDI

Hi, your initiative to update the HDI of Indian states (Kerala, Gujarat) is highly appreciated. However, it would be far more helpful if you could cite the changes with a WP:RS. In the case of Kerala, the citation already exists, but it misses for Gujarat. with regards AshLey ^Msg 10:34, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ashish Chauhan profile

Aurorion,

My name is Ashish Chauhan. I see that you seem to be hugely interested in editing out a lot of information which other people seem to be writing on my page - Ashish Chauhan. You also seem to have some opinions on the length of the article and hence you keep on removing most of the information under that pretext. My request is to desist from removing legitimate information which is not related vandalism. In case, you have any issues, please let me know on ashish.chauhan.mail@gmail.com. With regards. Ashish — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashishkumar Chauhan (talk • contribs) 06:44, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ashish, thanks for your message. I am only hugely interested in making sure that the information on your WP page follows the norms of Wikipedia. I have reverted some of the recent changes on the page for the following reasons:

A lot of the information recently added lacks WP:Reliable sources and seems to be primary research and not verifiable. It is important to cite sources when adding information to any WP article. But a lot of the added information lacks proper sources.

More importantly, the recent changes actually removed some good quality citations which were previously present in the article, some of which were added by me. (Examples: "The Insiders - CIOs Who Became CEOs", "BSE Institute Limited: Governing Board")

Wikipedia articles are not meant to be resumes. Some of the information which was added is simply not worthy to be added in an encyclopedia, especially without proper sources.
Some of the changes do not confirm to Wikipedia's Manual of Style:

Personalities are normally referred to by their last names, and not their first names (i.e., it should be "Chauhan" or "Ashish Chauhan", and not simply "Ashish").
Several dead links included in the edits which do not have WP pages (example: Bank of India Shareholding Limited or Central Depository Services of India Limited).

To clarify, the length of the article is not an issue at all. However, any information added to Wikipedia should follow its WP:Five pillars, and should be properly sourced. If you really are who you say you are (and I have no reason to suspect this), you would know all the information about the subject matter of this article (i.e., yourself) extremely well: however, this is not enough for you to add any information to the article. In fact, you have a clear WP:CoI in this case. On the other hand, if you wish to make properly sourced, verifiable, constructive edits then that is all right.

I assure you that I have no motive or intention to remove any relevant information from the WP article in question. As mentioned above, my only objective is to make sure that the information there follows the rules and norms of Wikipedia. I would be glad to help you out in improving the article based on Wikipedia's standards. Feel free to contact me if you have any queries/concerns on this. Thanks. Aurorion (talk) 10:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am Ashish Chauhan. However, I am not sure Aurorion is the name you carry in normal life. Having doubts about my identify is fair. However, you might like to reveal yourself so that it becomes more transparent.

There are several hundred URLs and other sources from which the data can be sourced about me. I remember, earlier versions of such URLs already deleted from Wikipedia. You might like to look at the history in the profile that has been deleted. In addition, if you search on web, more information will be available to fulfill the 5 pillars specified by you. Instead of searching for the info or asking the person who is adding such info to properly create the details you want, you end up deleting it.

You also seem to be under the impression that what you write is the only correct information.

For your information, I am not adding any information to the article. Other people are adding. It has been brought to my notice by those people that you are over zealous in deleting most of the information.

I am requesting you to be reasonable and not think that you are the only one who has the write to use Wikipedia.

If we need to talk on phone, please send me your mobile or phone number to confirm my identity as well as your identity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashishkumar Chauhan (talk • contribs) 11:49, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ashish, please address the issues highlighted in my earlier comment. Information added to Wikipedia need not just be "correct"; it needs to be Vertifiable. See the guidelines on WP:Verifiability: The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a reliable source that directly supports the material. Please add proper citations for the information you have supplied. A lot of the info you have restored is simply not verifiable. For example, I could not find a single reliable source saying that Ashish Chauhan's birthdate is March 16th. And you just cannot remove valid citations from a WP article and then add a ton of absolutely unsourced, poorly formatted information.

You cannot write a WP article like a resume. The content which you have restored looks just like one, and I have to say it reflects badly on the person the article is about, i.e., Ashish Chauhan. Please see the WP pages of Indian business executives such as Indra Nooyi, Sabyasachi Hajara and K. V. Kamath and see how they are formatted.

The information which you are now seeking to restore may not have been initially added by you, but now you clearly seem to have a WP:CoI in pushing for it. And it is easy to verify that the person who initially added the information also has a CoI. The IIMA guy has done an extremely poor job in putting together and formatting the content, hence this problem.

Please address the issues and add properly formatted content with well-sourced information. As I mentioned earlier, I have no interest in this except to see that this article is structured and formatted properly as per Wikipedia's standards. The core gist of all the information that you seek to restore is already present in the article, minus the resume peacock terms. I have added a couple more facts that are verifiable from the content that you had added to the article. If there is any more encyclopedia-worthy information you would like to add, please provide me reliable sources, I would be happy to add them for you. Thanks. Aurorion (talk) 13:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 20:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mapping the Global Economy

Hi Aurorion, I am looking for volunteers to re-create the link below for all 196 countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mcnabber091/Economy_of_the_United_States The goal of this project is to map out the global economy. Here is the project page https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_Economic_Map — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcnabber091 (talk • contribs) 04:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ajit Balakrishnan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An apology

Hi Aurorion. I am sorry for my outburst a few days ago at BLPN. Looking at it again, all of my words in that comment look unjustified to me now. Not that you brought it up, but I hope you can forget them and accept my apology. Best regards.OrangesRyellow (talk) 14:40, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi OrangesRyellow, thank you for your apology. It's okay, I guess sometimes we tend to get carried away in WP discussions. :) I also apologize if any of my comments offended you. Thanks. - Aurorion (talk) 16:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sunil Alagh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Krishnan Ganesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Venkat Viswanathan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Venkat Viswanathan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venkat Viswanathan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Human3015^TALK 14:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. I am not very familiar with the blocking procedures on Wikipedia, since I have never been blocked. Appreciate getting the above information from someone who is very experienced in getting repeatedly blocked. Hope you will try to keep yourself from getting blocked for a 6th time. - Aurorion (talk) 14:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because of me many other users got their first block. So be aware. --Human3015^TALK 14:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunil Alagh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sunil Alagh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Light2021 (talk) 21:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meena Ganesh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meena Ganesh, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Light2021 (talk) 22:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Krishnan Ganesh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Krishnan Ganesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Light2021 (talk) 22:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Meena Ganesh

The article Meena Ganesh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia as usual used by such people to create their profile and promote themselves. What so important and significant about such Biography is highly doubtful. Even doubtful who even Knows these couples? Is it really an encyclopedia material we are creating here. Non-Notable to read or even know about. Atleast in the present situation. Later they can also make article if become notable by public view.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Light2021 (talk) 23:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Meena Ganesh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meena Ganesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meena Ganesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 00:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krishnan Ganesh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krishnan Ganesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishnan Ganesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 00:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meena Ganesh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meena Ganesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://inc42.com/entrepreneurship/indian-women-entrepreneurs/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 00:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't quite recall the contents of the article or its history - but is there any way to check the timestamp of the edits on WP and compare against the article mentioned in your message? I don't know whether I myself made these edits in question - perhaps it is possible that the article might have copied the contents from the WP article, rather than the other way around? Thanks. Aurorion (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aurorion. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rahul Mukerjee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Rahul Mukerjee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Aurorion. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Aurorion/D. Shivakumar

Hello, Aurorion. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "D. Shivakumar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aurorion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aurorion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Aurorion/Swiggy

User:Aurorion/Swiggy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aurorion/Swiggy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Aurorion/Swiggy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of B. B. Chakrabarti

The article B. B. Chakrabarti has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:T. J. Joseph

Hello, Aurorion. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:T. J. Joseph, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:T. J. Joseph

Hello, Aurorion. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "T. J. Joseph".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shekhar Chaudhuri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shekhar Chaudhuri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edwardx (talk) 18:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]