Talk:Royal Rumble (2014)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal Rumble (2014) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Royal Rumble (2014) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

January 26 to February 1, 2014

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Facebuster#Swinging reverse STO|Sister Abigail]] The anchor (#Swinging reverse STO) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

December 2013

I'm not sure how to do a message on a Wiki, but I'd like to say that the first match will PROBABLY be Daniel Bryan vs John Cena vs Randy Orton for the Undisputed Championship, so you guys could add that if you want.

Unfortunately, you're just guessing that this'll be a match, so it won't be added. — Richard BB 23:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well yeah, but it's so easy to predict.... You can probably predict EVERY match on here and get it right, it's so easy. There's only gonna be 4 or 5 matches because the Royal Rumble takes an hour roughly. It's so easy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.227.189 (talk) 20:58, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No matter how easy you think it is to predict, it's still just guessing, and we don't include people's random guessing. — Richard BB 21:19, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You should.... it's wrestling, who cares? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.227.189 (talk) 22:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopaedia. Your guesswork can be taken to forums, not be speculated upon here — Richard BB 13:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, looks like it's a good job we didn't include your guesswork... — Richard BB 18:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not an editor and i hav eno idea how this works but i just wanted to point out a minor typo, it says single match when its supposed to say singles match for the orton vs cena match. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.52.188.53 (talk) 02:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks. — Richard BB 18:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

|Randy Orton (c) defeated John Cena 90.199.176.211 (talk) 02:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done by someone else - as the article already says that. Arjayay (talk) 15:02, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

31 eliminations?

lolwut? Someone needs to doublecheck the eliminations. Should only be 29.. TySoltaur (talk) 03:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

4 people were used for Rusev's elimination and all 4 were credited. Also Kane was not credited for his elimination. 72.94.193.52 (talk) 07:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ROH

Why is there a ROH mention in the reviews section? That has no bearing on the PPV and just seems like a smark's throw-in to try and talk about how great RH is, rather than the PPV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.117.17.61 (talk) 07:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just caught that and removed it. STATic message me! 07:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Take a deep breath folks

Let's not use the reception section as a soap box, okay? I've seen a number of questionable sources used, and some highly POV statements put in. Worst ppv since 2006? Any source that would write that doesn't know what their talking about, and thus isn't reliable and thus shouldn't be used. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 13:42, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of soap box, how ridiculous was it to punish Punk with the #1 draw? If they'd have given him #2, Seth Rollins could have kicked him when he entered the ring. Blown opportunity, The Authority! Also, that's a terrible name for a stable of authority figures. But yes, sources. Daniel Bryan would have wanted it that way. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Times

I'm not telling the editor that it's wrong, but it seems strange that Punk had only forty seconds more than Rollins, and I thought that the commentators specified that Punk had surpassed the fifty minute mark. Just want to throw it out there, I'm probably not correct, but just in case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.74.71.6 (talk) 18:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Entrant times

I was able to get the amount of time each entrant was in the ring but as it is semi-protected I can't add it in. Should someone who can edit it be given this info? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.46.184 (talk) 19:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Post the information and an editor will place it in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.74.71.6 (talk) 19:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

When Antonio Cesaro, Dean Ambrose, and Seth Rollins get eliminated by Roman Reigns Cesaro was out first and should be number 24 then Rollins at 25 and last Ambrose at 26 in the Order column. 71.10.34.40 (talk) 22:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done by someone else - to quote Arjayay - as the article already says that. starship.paint (talk | contribs) 12:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ordering of # of eliminations

Could someone who is more versed in editing find a manner to edit the entry and eliminations table so that, when sorting by number of eliminations, Roman Reigns appears on the top of the list? As it is now, Batista's 4 eliminations gets placed higher on the sorted list than Reign's 12. If the column is to be "sortable" from highest number to lowest, then this needs to be fixed. 67.181.76.194 (talk) 07:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath typo and spoiler

In The Aftermath section there is "which set up a match was set up between the groups at the Elimination Chamber pay-per-view,[29] where the Wyatts emerged victorious.[30]", the start of this makes no sense and it ends in the most heinous spoiler not usually seen in these "Aftermath" sections. 77.97.92.68 (talk) 11:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not enforce any kind of spoiler policy, so this can remain. However, the actual sentence is poorly written, so I'll clean it up a little. — Richard BB 12:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I've decided to remove it, not because it's a spoiler but because it's irrelevant. — Richard BB 12:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will be restoring this in some fashion to the next paragraph. I don't know how versed 77.97.92.68 is in high quality (Featured / Good Article) PPV articles, but I have produced 3 GAs on PPVs already, and I see no problem in mentioning the results of the next PPV for the major players in this PPV. There is no such thing as spoilers on PPV articles. In this case, Bray Wyatt is a major player in this PPV. His immediate PPV aftermath deserves coverage.
I will be expanding the Aftermath section ... to-do list: Lesnar/Undertaker and Batista's WWE World Heavyweight Championship match at WrestleMania XXX. starship.paint "YES !" 13:28, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]