Talk:Lists of Lionsgate films

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Consistent columns in all tables

I restored all columns for upcomings and TBA. I tried it both ways, and this seems best for the following reasons:

Data is constantly incoming, and will eventually land in the empty cells.
The presence of these columns offers a place for the content to be added.
No future formatting will be required.
Empty cells tell a tale. They actually provide information at a glance.
Tables with some columns omitted force visitors to spend extra effort figuring out what is missing.
The visual presentation afforded by consistent tables is worth it.

I have posted here, because my judgement is not always best. If anyone wishes the tables to be otherwise, please feel free to discuss it here. Many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't really understand why a "Gross" column is in the upcoming films table. The film will be moved to the main table once released. So it really doesn't force editors to spend more time figuring it out since a unreleased film does not have a gross. —Mike Allen 05:05, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]