User talk:Universaladdress

Archives

Thank you Universaladdress, its good to hear it from a fellow Wikipedian. elmasmelih (used to be KazekageTR) 06:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: The Seoul Times

Hello Universaladdress, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Seoul Times, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll gladly put it up for more thorough review, as it consists of one sentence sourced to an article that is about the original, different, and notable "Seoul Times" - which is not the topic of the article - and then one promotional sentence with a single reference: the Web site that is the non-notable topic of the article. Universaladdress (talk) 02:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Good catch, Universaladdress. (As you mentioned, "one promotional sentence" - but this does not make the whole article unambiguously promotional.) Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2607:FB90:B09:F85F:A563:E35:5AC7:64D2

Can you take a look at Special:Contributions/2607:FB90:B09:F85F:A563:E35:5AC7:64D2? Thanks, Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll look at it this weekend. Universaladdress (talk) 23:22, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- ferret (talk) 02:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]