User talk:Amanuensis Balkanicus

Serbian mafia

I don't understand,may you can help me? Edyn322 (talk) 02:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Edyn332: I reverted you because you added inline citations to the very beginning of the opening paragraph, which isn't where they belong. If you wish to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, there are plenty of users who would be willing to help you out. For more, please consult Help:Contents. Happy editing. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 22:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Authors of the declaration

Read the advisory opinion of the ICJ and you will understand that according to that, the authors of the declaration were not the Assembly of Kosovo or the body of temporary self-government, some third parties. Which did not act as institutions, but individually.--Savasampion (talk) 11:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

Thank you today for Uroš Drenović, in collaboration, and introduced: "Drenović (pronounced Drenovich) was a Bosnian Serb Chetnik leader during World War II. He started off as part of the general rebellion against the extreme nationalist Ustaše and their genocidal policies against the Serbs, but soon turned against the Communist-led Yugoslav Partisans who wanted to fight the Axis occupiers. He despised Muslims and Croats, and as a Chetnik he collaborated with first the Ustaše, then the Italians and the Germans. Aged 33, he was killed in an Allied bombing raid on Banja Luka in May 1944. Despite his extensive collaboration with the Axis Powers during the war, a street in Banja Luka is named after him, and within the Serb entity of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republika Srpska, the actions of his Chetniks are celebrated and equated with those of the Partisans."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another great collaboration. Thanks AB! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great work as usual, Peacemaker67. Happy to have been of help. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 02:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Serbia (1882–1918)

Modern flag? https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/vintage-patriotic-postcard-illustration-unity-is-strength-featuring-picture-id1229775551?k=20&m=1229775551&s=612x612&w=0&h=HT-VwhLjJmh7fc1_vNIHY3c36-K0u8eczopZnfP3WBc= https://www.prints-online.com/image/164/14288199/14288199_450_450_676_0_fit_0_d6f9a069d4c7c819e8f1596c1316cee8.jpg https://images.vitber.com/product_main_v2/product/568952188c5ec.jpeg https://images.vitber.com/product_main_v2/product/58e78da52ee97.jpg https://japanwarart.ocnk.net/data/japanwarart/product/20181222_ece7f4.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pobedata_nad_syrbia_(cropped).JPG https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pozdrav_sa_srpskog_primorja.jpg  --Savasampion (talk) 18:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Serbs of Montenegro

They don't call themselves Montenegrins? Check this out: [[1]] Macedonian Bulgarians call themselves Macedonians, that is, by the name of the territory. --Savasampion (talk) 18:44, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Muja (alligator)

The article Muja (alligator) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Muja (alligator) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Blablubbs (talk) 10:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

report

why are u reporting me Truthseeker2006 (talk) 14:44, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Truthseeker2006: Because you've edit-warred and made more than 3 reverts in the span of 24 hours. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 14:47, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

well when i added a toponym it had the tag reverted i dont know why i just added info is that wrong Truthseeker2006 (talk) 14:50, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should discuss this on the talk page with the users you are edit-warring with. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 14:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Admin comment) Your report on WP:AN3 was premature, and I have closed it with no action. You must notify the alleged edit-warrior on the user's talk page and attempt to engage in discussion on the article's talk page. If that fails, then report it. A discretionary sanctions notice has been placed on Truthseeker2006's talk page, and that is all that's required for now. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i clicked undo twice only u have no reason to report me also what do u mean users im edit warring with? Truthseeker2006 (talk) 14:54, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See C.Fred's notice on your talk page. Two reverts can qualify as warring, depending on the context. You're a new editor, so look at WP:BRD. If someone undoes your changes, you let it be and go to the talk page to discuss it. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, AB, it is exceedingly bad form to report an editor for edit warring and then engage in the same edit war with a second editor. I'd go so far as to say it's a blockable offence. Take the matter to the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

creation of article using only albanian sources

have a look at this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koplik_War — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:B07:6469:985D:1D96:DE96:BA6E:E500 (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but who are you exactly? Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 22:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i noticed you have the extented edtitor staus, i just wanted to share a suspect article with no RS so you can view it. 2001:B07:6469:985D:F83C:E727:3B29:A5FB (talk) 23:25, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Aleksandar Berić

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aleksandar Berić you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 09:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Aleksandar Beri?

The article Aleksandar Beri? you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Aleksandar Beri? for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 09:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Aleksandar Berić

The article Aleksandar Berić you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aleksandar Berić for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Following of Ante Pavlović

Hello Amanuensis Balkanicus. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Following of Ante Pavlović, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: ineligible for WP:G4, because the previous discussion was closed as soft delete. Thank you. $Salvio$ 13:27, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Hand.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ideology Section

The same user keeps adding back Anti Serb Sentiment despite yourself and other editors pointing out that it isn’t a political ideology but a prejudice. I think I understand their well intentions as it was a mentality the Ustase obviously held but not correct for the category. Appears to be no communication in their diffs. Looks like this time it went unnoticed for a while. Anything that can be done about such behavior? Despite multiple users explaining to them it doesn’t appear to be affective. Thanks OyMosby (talk) 20:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey @User:Amanuensis Balkanicus, hope you are well, could you please check this "citation attempt" of this ip [[2]] on Dobrica Cosic page and later conversation with an admin, doesn't this kind of editing resembles on someone who is banned from english wikipedia? And isn t this a typical editing of a person, who did similar things earlier i.e here [[3]] what do you think? Theonewithreason (talk) 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Theonewithreason. There are plenty of blocked/banned users out there. Did you have anyone in mind? Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 00:36, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amanuensis Balkanicus I am not that experienced like you are in sock investigation, but the way they are communicating and the location of this ip, especially using word "unfortunately" I believe this one [[4]] examples are [[5]] [[6]], also other sentence constructions are quite similar, I also believe that this is too similar to be ignored [[7]],[[8]] [[9]], there quite a lot of other examples. Theonewithreason (talk) 03 December 2022 (UTC)

This does look suspicious, but in my experience it is notoriously difficult to get admins to take action on the basis of IP activity. If you have seen further parallels I would encourage you to get in touch with the admin who imposed the topic ban on this particular user. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 21:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Amanuensis Balkanicus I will inspect further activities, after will try to contact admin, if there is a escalation of disruptive editing may I bother you to help me in filling a SPI report later ? I had some negative experience previously, even though it was obvious. You can see it here [[10]] Theonewithreason (talk) 04 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jasenovac – istina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Offenbach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of List of international goals scored by Aleksandar Mitrović

Congratulations, Amanuensis Balkanicus! The list you nominated, List of international goals scored by Aleksandar Mitrović, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian orthodox church article

Hello, its ocurring stalking and vandalism in the Serbian Orthodox Church article, making the quality of the article worse. Could you analyze it? thanks 187.36.171.127 (talk) 19:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Srdan Golubović → Srđan Golubović

Fully approve. But why Ana Ivanovic? In ictu oculi (talk) 18:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you're referring to, but apparently the person's first name is actually Srdan, not Srđan. So I have changed it back to the original title. Regards, Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ivo Rojnica

On 14 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ivo Rojnica, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1941 Ivo Rojnica ruled that all Serbs and Jews were banned from walking the streets of Dubrovnik at night? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ivo Rojnica. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ivo Rojnica), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Adem Jashari

Adem Jashari has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. // Timothy :: talk 23:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Adem Jashari

Adem Jashari has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. // Timothy :: talk 23:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balšić noble family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ragusa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shlomo Sand, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Orthodox Christians and Native American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Josip Runjanin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Josip Runjanin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BigChrisKenney -- BigChrisKenney (talk) 06:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Josip Runjanin

The article Josip Runjanin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Josip Runjanin for comments about the article, and Talk:Josip Runjanin/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BigChrisKenney -- BigChrisKenney (talk) 02:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your GA nomination of Sisak concentration camp

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sisak concentration camp you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 01:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]