Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2015/09

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2015

01 September 2015

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started the moment previous protection expired. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 13:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. MusikAnimal talk 20:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Open to editing by template editors per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 23:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 20:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Open to editing by template editors per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 23:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 20:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Open to editing by template editors per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 09:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 20:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Open to editing by template editors per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 19:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 20:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Open to editing by template editors per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 19:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 20:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Open to editing by template editors per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 19:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 20:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qed237, can you give examples of the vandalism? It's rather a lot to look through. Sarah (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SlimVirgin: [1], [2], [3] and other revision that has been removed are edits I can find on the spot, but there are also a lot of unsourced edits where IP added players not signed with the club (transfer deadline today). Qed237 (talk) 19:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Qed237, thanks, I've added the protection.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarah (talk) 20:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It appears from the log that GorillaWarfare intended to do this yesterday, yet the article is currently completely unprotected and under a bit of a barrage of vandalism. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I definitely read the log wrong. Changed request to temporary semi. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: A baseball player named "Scott Alexander" has just been promoted to the major leagues, so he'll be notable per WP:BASE/N when he makes his first appearance. We typically create their pages before then.[4] The past deletions were for a British millionaire. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 19:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long-term sockpuppetry by bitter losing fan, who also vandalised the page on the winning team in one of his former states. Not here to contribute and as hard to get rid of as smoking '''tAD''' (talk) 17:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarah (talk) 19:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – once again, the page is being subject to rampant vandalism, adding of fake episodes that can be found on no official source. From the edit history, it seems like clear vandalism to me. Artemis Panthar (talk) 17:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The series began less than a month ago and every day the page is vandalized repeatedly, adding results from episodes that have not occurred yet and are not sourced. In only the past month, the page has been temporarily protected several times. As soon as the protection is lifted, vandals run rampant. In fact, protection expired last night, and there have already been about 40 edits - most of which had to be undone as vandalism. I would like to request that the page be protected until the finale airs in early December. Thanks SchoolMarm101 (talk) 18:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: So that template editors can edit. It's quite doubtful that this is going to happen again. If I thought it would, I would have contacted the re-protecting admin first. Steel1943 (talk) 23:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sarah (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 10:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. With the exception of today's attack, there's been no edits since March. I think protection is unnecessary at this stage as the IP has already been blockd. GedUK  12:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent deletion of reports of criticism. DChinu (talk) 12:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 12:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Enough disruptive IP editing going on. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 13:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Reduce move protection to TE per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 09:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 15:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: Repeated high level of IP vandalism. Page already semi-protected twice. IP user vandalism when protection expires Magentic Manifestations (talk) 14:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent activity by IPs, probably because the movie was recently on TV. ukexpat (talk) 15:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to recent football transfer activity. --Jimbo[online] 12:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ged UK. NeilN talk to me 12:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Heh yes, I was just trying to sort out the mess! GedUK  12:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No longer used in any current RfD nominations. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:44, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any technical reason to unprotect? Nakon 04:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@GeoffreyT2000: Why do you want this unprotected? The page is kept there as a historical archive of how the {{Rfd}} template previously function before its Lua conversion. If you need an edit done to it, I would recommend going to Template talk:Rfd/core and posting a request. Steel1943 (talk) 23:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There's absolutely no reason to decline unprotecting an unused template; and no reason needs to be provided for unprotecting beyond the mere fact that is unused. Pages are only protected with good reason; it is not with good reason that they are unprotected. Alakzi (talk) 09:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Open to editing by template editors per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 12:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Xaosflux who changed protection from TE to admin only. --NeilN talk to me 14:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Admin only This template is used in the interface (MediaWiki:Watchlist-details), which is sysop only. — xaosflux Talk 02:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined by Xaosflux. Added template for the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – The template is protected yet, so the doc should be as well. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 06:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One does not follow the other. Especially given the lack of editing on that page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Three Users got blocked for this page. Aero Slicer 10:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for automated comment, but still it needs to be full protected till that AFD is over.--Aero Slicer 12:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Current surge in IP nonsense. The page is victim to a subtle viral marketing campaign by two Australian radio talkshow presenters, and their fans are repeatedly vandalising the page as a result. --benlisquareTCE 11:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yngvadottir.. GedUK  12:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of disruptive IP edits due to media stories. JMHamo (talk) 12:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: Persistent vandalism and unconstructive editing from IP users. – Zumoarirodoka(talk)(email) 00:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Especially the last 50 edits. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 00:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP genre warring/vandalism. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 09:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit count is pretty low recently. PC will probably work better. GedUK  12:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced/incorrect information to BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 10:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It'll probably settle down now the deal's been signed, but just in case. GedUK  12:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP trying to make this disamb page into their bio (not notable, pretty sure). — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 10:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Recurring IP vandalism, adding of unrealistic proposals. Has already been temporarily semi-protected twice this year. See Page revision history in particular. Nick Mitchell 98 (talk) 10:37, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Anonymous IP reverting out "false" from description of discredited negative claims about a living person. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Spate of silly IP vandalism this morning. McGeddon (talk) 09:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Tide rolls.. GedUK  11:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High rate of kiddie vandal-type edits. Probably for obvious reasons, given the topic. Montanabw(talk) 06:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple and sock silly additions, without any discussion, wasting members time to care for the content. Govindaharihari (talk) 07:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. Musa Talk  07:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38 Ogress smash! 07:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38 Ogress smash! 07:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38 Ogress smash! 07:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38 Ogress smash! 07:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38 Ogress smash! 07:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38 Ogress smash! 07:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38 Ogress smash! 07:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38 Ogress smash! 07:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38 Ogress smash! 07:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38 Ogress smash! 07:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38. Ogress smash! 07:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, socking edit warrior. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cydevil38. Ogress smash! 08:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced and fan interpretive info being added. Other Dallas-related pages were recently semi-protected for the same reasons (and because of the same user who uses multiple different IPs) however, have just become unprotected and the user is now back.Cebr1979 (talk) 16:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 18:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, including adding untrue/unsourced information, predictions of future events, and continually disregarding decisions made via consensus, despite many warnings, both inline and on talk pages, and several prior periods of semi-protection. - Katanin (talk) 20:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive editing and vandalism by IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic my talk page! 20:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Trolling IP hopper [5] --NeilN talk to me 00:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Speculation and poorly-sourced information from IP editors. ViperSnake151  Talk  03:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: BLP policy violations. Mdann52 (talk) 12:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see good faith editing. NeilN talk to me 01:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A new IP address is attempting to add content with YouTube as a source. However, YouTube is not considered a reliable source and I'm hoping for a week's worth of protection from IP addresses. Khazar (talk) 20:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Khazar, I'm declining this for now. "YouTube is not considered a reliable source" is not quite accurate. It's the source, not the medium that matters. For example, the official BBC channel on YouTube is a reliable source. Bearing this in mind, if you think the source still isn't reliable, please post a note on the talk page and see if the IP responds. NeilN talk to me 02:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. KH-1 (talk) 03:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Someone is promoting not notable persons in the list of notable recipients, he/she is not able to discuss, but is able to create socks. Was informed about our policy about socks, but withouth reaction. Yopie (talk) 16:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yopie, if you suspect socking, please open a WP:SPI NeilN talk to me 01:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Not even exaggerating, I've had to remove "Australia" from the info box a dozen times. TropicAces (talk) 02:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Question: TropicAces, I don't see where you've outlined why "Australia" is against guidelines. NeilN talk to me 02:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neil the film is purely American, but an IP continues to add "Australia" to the production company and opening line (and it's not done in proper format or sources, so it's clearly to troll). TropicAces (talk) 02:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TropicAces, protected to force discussion, not as an acceptance these edits are obvious vandalism. Would be good if you posted on the talk page as Australia is mentioned several times throughout the article. NeilN talk to me 02:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and many IP edits for this surprise album release, announced during last night's MTV VMAs. --Another Believer (Talk) 03:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Long-term edit warring and disregard of consensus in removal of sourced information regarding political position and change of page title in the opening paragraph. Gotha  Talk 18:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. or warned MusikAnimal talk 20:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - Persistent violations of WP:BLP policy (namely additions of unsourced WP:BLP content) by multiple IP editors. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 22:43, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:41, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism; subject of a rumored trade not yet official.Thechased (talk) 01:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Somebody, or some group, is persistently engaging in genre warring, trying to remove the genre "goth" from the article, despite multiple reviewers calling the band style "goth". Binksternet (talk) 01:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 16:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Indeed, the revision history is a disgrace, but I see it more as a content dispute rather than vandalism. Given there are but two primary editors involved this can easily be resolved with blocking. Warned both about edit warring. I'll actively monitor the situation MusikAnimal talk 18:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 19:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Doc James. NeilN talk to me 20:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Open to editing by template editors per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 15:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 22:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

02 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. School's in session. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B169:DAFB:E15A:DBC4 (talk) 16:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP editing claiming to be Rick Allan Ross in violation of this ArbCom decision. Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Scientology#Rick Alan Ross instructed and restricted . JbhTalk 17:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 18:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the past few days. Article is about a living person. Zwerg Nase (talk) 17:33, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 17:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 13:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question: KH-1, signing's confirmed. Still need protection? NeilN talk to me 14:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Looks manageable now. NeilN talk to me 13:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection for 48 hours or so. Darkfrog24 keeps making undiscussed changes that introduce errors, and editwarring to remove a word the editor doesn't like and has tendentiously been on the warpath about since at least May 2009. There is an ongoing discussion at WT:MOS about whether that particular change should be made, in which the editor has not achieved consensus for this change (it's a change against logical quotation, the quotation punctuation system WP has had since the first version of MOS in August 2002, a subject of perennial debate (in recent years, usually temporally WP:OTHERPARENT-shopped by Darkfrog24) in which the sides, the arguments, the sourced facts, and the consensus never change, but which Darkfrog24 pursues relentlessly, year after year, in a WP:IDHT pattern). The present issue is both temporary(?) conventional editwarring (DF has made this anti-consensus change, to remove "logical", three times in one day [6] [7] [8], and will not take "get consensus first" for an answer), and part of a pattern of very long-term slow editwarring against logical quotation. This new spate closely mirrors, and looks like the beginning of a new version of, the same editor's 5-year pattern at WT:MOSFAQ:

Details:
  • to get rid of or sow confusion about the terms "logical quotation" and "typesetters' quotation", either by hiding them entirely or by editwarring in "British style" and "American style", respectively, to confuse the distinctions and to support the editor's 6-year campaign to undo logical quotation on WP as somehow "anti-American" (despite the fact that British and logical quotation styles have been conclusively proven to be different and that many American publishers use logical quotation, demonstrated repeatedly in years of re-discussion of this issue): [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
  • and/or to try to paint this as not a matter of well-sourced facts, but just as the opinion that some editors have arrived at: [14] [15] [16] [17] [18], [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] (note denigration of counter-arguments as "stupid")
  • and has pursued this slow-editwarring tactic relentlessly after multiple editors object, as here: [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32], including attempts to compromise [33].
  • Darkfrog24 has even tried to turn MOS's own FAQ into a rallying point for "challenging MOS" to get "satisfaction": [34] and is insistent about it [35] over objections.

The long-term issue may need to be addressed at ANI, but a repeat of what has happened at/to WT:MOSFAQ needs to be prevented at MOS itself in the short term.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  10:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm thinking of declining this as the issue is bigger than a simple full-protect; there is a clear edit war on the MOS FAQ and a quick look at the talk page reveals the area is under discretionary sanctions (see here). I'd recommend taking this straight to WP:AE. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the immediate editwarring is at MOS; the MOSFAQ one is a slow-editwarring thing over a long period of time. I don't know if AE does anything about that sort of thing, nor what the AE grounds would be for either case (I tend to stay out of AE, from past negative experiences with a AE-regular admin who is not MoS-friendly, so I wouldn't know how to go about pursuing such a request anyway). WP:ARBATC is mostly about attacks and incivility, not editwarring, though maybe I need to read it again and see if anything in it can be used to address this stuff. This sort of "civil POV-pushing" is specifically designed to evade action under NPA-based ArbCom cases like that. The reason I asked for an FP on the MOS page is that a day or two of stoppage is probably long enough for regular watchers of the page to notice the issue. I can't keep undoing DF's disruptive edits on my own or it'll just make me editwarring, at least as a technicality. I'm skeptical that reversion of blatantly anti-consensus alterations to major guideline and policy pages is certain to fall outside the standard exceptions, but I don't like to seem as if trying to game the system myself. If something isn't done, though, this pattern of trying again and again and again until one day enough people have given up is destined to WP:WIN just by sheer attrition. The mess that's been made by this editor of the MOSFAQ proves that conclusively, and we've seen this effect before on other kinds of pages, e.g. by slow civilPOV warping of many of the articles on Pakistan (see Signpost article on that), etc. I've been super-extra patient with this editor's WP:IDHT disruptive/tendentious editing patterns at MoS (on multiple issues, this is just their main one) for several years, but enough is enough.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  13:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeat disruption from IP commenting on behaviour when parading the flag. Appears to be a Dynamic IP, so blocking is unlikely to have any affect. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like the spate of vandalism is over. NeilN talk to me 13:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:55, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High level of IP/non-autoconfirmed users adding text that is incoherent. One was already blocked for edit-warring, but it has continued on other IPs and now with accounts. ~ RobTalk 13:58, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of incoherent text by IP and new editors. ~ RobTalk 14:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Seems to be a trend. Target because it is a primary subject page. I have noticed the IP vandalism has increased very recently. Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 14:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Highly visible page during Wiki Loves Monuments (September). Saqib (talk) 08:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Most edits to this page for the past six months have been genre warring. A single user, who appears to hop between IP's and various new accounts, keeps adding the same undiscussed, unsourced genres into the article, which are then reverted. Examples 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 10:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has a long history of COI editing and in the last few days there have been several similar IPs providing "correct" information. . SmartSE (talk) 12:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 03:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content and removal of sourced content. Multiple related IPs claim the content derives from a book written by the editor's father, whose name is continually removed and re-added to the notable persons section. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B169:DAFB:E15A:DBC4 (talk) 07:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Anon IP attack. Possible range block may be requested soon. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing, including fancruft additions. Previous semi-protection was for 3 weeks. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:40, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 01:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Sudden increase of IPs calling the character Samus a transwoman for some reason. GamerPro64 01:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Bilby for 24 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 05:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection -- already protected but vandalism continues as though nothing happened (see [36]) since then. Quis separabit? 02:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP address is adding a Chinese tabloid and trying to pass it off as reliable source. Khazar (talk) 22:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. KrakatoaKatie 01:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 00:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. KrakatoaKatie 00:53, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: frequent vandalism.LM2000 (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined PC seems to be working as intended. KrakatoaKatie 00:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: This can shut off a major bot. WARNING: Do not add protection request templates to the page, it will shut off the bot.Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 03:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this one has shown up before, isn't the reason the shutoff switch page is unprotected because Σ isn't an admin and won't be able to edit it? tutterMouse (talk) 05:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question:. You should first check with @Σ: and see if this is required. The last edit was in May so there really seems little urgency here. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The risk is low and the impact of maliciously shutting off the bot wouldn't be huge. Besides, there are good reasons to leave the page available to non-admins. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent sockpuppetry from IP socks of Giovannigiulio. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

S.C. Ruffey

Indefinite full protection: Please do Not allow it to be turned back into an independent article. Lior (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined A few things: This was a double redirect, which I've fixed. I see that S. C. Ruffey has gone back and forth between being a redirect, but there's apparently no accompanying discussion about this. I'd like to see that before we protect against a redirect being created. Either way, the requested page, S.C. Ruffey has had no disruption and we should not protect preemptively MusikAnimal talk 23:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unsourced changes are being added to the page including unsourced death dates. Stabila711 (talk) 01:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 01:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Suspected sockpuppetry. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 19:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined AGF a bit here per this NeilN talk to me 19:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – User was blocked indefinitely for a username violation. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 20:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Skyllfully: What edits are you referring to? I could not find any. NeilN talk to me 20:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User has not edited their talk page, and are fully entitled to if they want to contest the block (I went to decline but got an edit conflict) MusikAnimal talk 20:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Answer @NeilN: hmm... Oops, must've been another user, although, I was pretty sure I saw something. Sorry for wasting your time. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 20:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 20:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: - Two editors edit-warring again (for days). Also possible vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator MusikAnimal. KrakatoaKatie 00:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism by specific user(s) resubmitting false information. WolfSpear (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined WolfSpear, the other editor is autoconfirmed so protection won't stop them. I recommend you add a report to WP:ANI, including diffs showing the false information they've added over time. NeilN talk to me 19:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Anon IP keeps adding a conspiracy theory to the page with a source to infowars.com (which happens to be run by Alex Jones, a conspiracy theorist). IsraphelMac (talk) 18:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 19:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: At least a few examples of IP vandalism every day. Most of it is reverted by ClueBot but some of it slips through and has to be reverted by hand. --Stabila711 (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03 September 2015

Semi-protection: Judge involved in Tom Brady suspension case, just overturned the suspension. Multiple instances of recent IP vandalism, so I'd suggest semi-protect for a week or so until there's something else in the news cycle. Matteric (talk) 17:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Request again if it continues much. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ayub407 (talk) 17:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 96 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the one account involved blocked as well. Courcelles (talk) 19:42, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by Los Angeles Dodgers fans. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Courcelles (talk) 19:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long term edit war. Human3015Send WikiLove  06:48, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only two editors involved. Warned both about edit warring. I'll monitor the situation MusikAnimal talk 14:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --palmiped |  Talk  12:59, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 15:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – User keeps blanking their talk page, removing their warnings. IsraphelMac (talk) 18:50, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done (re-blocked without TPA). You're welcome. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – High-visibility BLP incurring vandalism and BLP violations. . - MrX 14:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Courcelles. NeilN talk to me 17:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP-hopping vandal. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Telstra.2C_Australia_IP_vandalism for additional details. Deli nk (talk) 15:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP-hopping vandal. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Telstra.2C_Australia_IP_vandalism for additional details. Deli nk (talk) 15:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term and frequent vandalism. -- ferret (talk) 16:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Very controversial subject receiving a high level of IP vandalism. Fairly long protection may be necessary. -- BullRangifer (talk) 16:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Persistent vandalism: Persistent nonsensical and disruptive editing by anonymous IPs. (Editorial note: These edits could possibly be an outcome of recent South Korea-Japan diplomatic friction following the publishing of an article regarding South Korean President Park by the Sankei newspaper.) --User:WoodElf 12:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 15:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Requesting PC1 pending-changes protection of this high-profile page, frequently subjected to "fandalism" along the lines of Harry Potter-related topics. Elizium23 (talk) 14:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I was on the fence with this one. Going to have to favour semi as I believe the edit rate to be too high at times for pending changes MusikAnimal talk 15:08, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Permanently suffering continuous reversions and alterations from IPs. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editor won't stop reverting edits. Krystaleen 07:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:08, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive additions of unsourced rumors. Increasingly unhelpful edits. Mostly from IPs. See talk page. Uncle Alf (talk) 10:32, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A jumping IP keeps adding Selena Gomez to the cast list without any proof. It's been 3 or 4 socks already. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 11:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection just expired and vandalism starts again. JMHamo (talk) 01:52, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Highly visible page. Saqib (talk) 06:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page was recently semi-protected for three days because someone had used multiple different IP addresses to add and re-add Turbo Launcher multiple times. This person did not engage in consensus building. Now it seems that this person is back. He/She is again using different IP addresses to add and re-add the same non-notable entry and has yet to engage in any form of consensus building. Dodi 8238 (talk) 06:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Attempt to create a negative BLP based on unsuitable sources. The Banner talk 23:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarah (talk) 04:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs making identical edits in defiance of consensus (bringing article into line with MOS). DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 04:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarah (talk) 04:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remove move protection: Remove the move protection on this title so that I can restore the content ... and then immediately either WP:PROD it or nominate it for WP:AFD. The history of this page refers to a subject that could go by the name Blah (definition) and is in no way related to its current target Blah, a disambiguation page. (Disclaimer: I did not ask the protecting admin first since I do not intend to improve the article, but rather, I intend to immediate nominate this for deletion, basically per WP:NOTDIC. In fact, I would be okay if the move protection remained on this page after it gets moved elsewhere; it just needs to be moved away from this odd title.) Steel1943 (talk) 23:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected There's no need for this to be move protected. Do with it what you will. Courcelles (talk) 03:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple autoconfirmed users have removed this useless trivia but, only IPs (and one sockpuppet) keep putting it back. Cebr1979 (talk) Cebr1979 (talk) 10:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by a repeatedly blocked IP-hopping editor. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Telstra.2C_Australia_IP_vandalism for details. Deli nk (talk) 13:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 19:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But without prejudice to a further request if the problems continue. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by 165.221.114.244 (talk · contribs), verging on WP:edit warring. Useddenim (talk) 22:40, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Take it to AIV or ANEW. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: As the issue with the release of videos by CMP is still going on, I think protecting this for a few more months is warranted. There's been a few drive-bys sofar. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 20:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I restored the original duration. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism (IP and new users) and frequent insertion of content that violates copyright. Chihciboy (talk) 23:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Vandalism, unsourced additions. Thechased (talk) 01:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left the PC on intentionally. Courcelles (talk) 02:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Telsra IP vandal: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Telstra.2C_Australia_IP_vandalism. Huldra (talk) 13:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already requested once -- non-stop vandalism changing religion from Islam to Sikh (see [37]). Quis separabit? 20:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 20:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: New users/bots adding links to illegal streaming websites. J man708 (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remove semi-protection: This article has been semi-protected for almost five years. In addition to myself, there have been other useful IP edit requests on the talk page in that time span. The Tasmanian devil is not a wildly controversial subject, or a living person's biography. Wikipedia is supposed to be the encyclopedia that anybody can edit. Thank you. 110.20.234.69 (talk) 20:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not getting anything in the protection log. If I protected it, I don't remember why. No objection to unprotecting. — kwami (talk) 00:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
When I make edit requests, the person who is named as protecting the article is YellowMonkey. --110.20.234.69 (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, kwami only moved YellowMonkey's protection. As YellowMonkey is inactive, I've unprotected. --NeilN talk to me 00:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected NeilN talk to me 00:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Yo Cyberbot, edit protection was lifted. NeilN talk to me 00:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page, which has a history of problematic edits, is being continually plagued by an apparent practical joker trying to make a WP:BLP vio stick. Despite RS footnoting in the article contradicting his claim, and despite repeated requests such as this for RS citing, this IP-hopping editor shows no sign of stopping.

Since late July alone, he has made the same edit as

--Tenebrae (talk) 14:40, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: This user has moved his user talk page inappropriately three times. John of Reading (talk) 16:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. John of Reading, thanks for fixing stuff. In the future, consider turning on the "don't leave redirect" option when moving pages across namespaces. NeilN talk to me 16:55, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: I would find that option useful sometimes, but only admins have it. -- John of Reading (talk) 17:01, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. We really do need to unbundle some of these things. --NeilN talk to me 17:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from a wide range of IP addresses and newly registered accounts. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 19:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done: semi for 3 days + PC for a week. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mz7 (talk) 20:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent edit-warring involving several users. Same content has been removed and re-added six times in the last 24 hours. Ca2james (talk) 20:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WadeSimMiser (talk) 21:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since this is a controversial radio station, there have been vandal edits every now and then. OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 17:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent edit warring – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring. 86.157.105.59 (talk) 17:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Vsmith. MusikAnimal talk 19:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I just revert back a number of edits to the article from IPs changing various information. . Wildthing61476 (talk) 18:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: From full protection to Semi protection. because i want to do a major edit on the article A8v (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The article was fully protected 12 hours ago because of an edit war. Major edits should be discussed first. NeilN talk to me 13:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – article was persistently vandalized by IP user. Ayub407talk 13:33, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems like the suspect that had persistently damaged the page has already been blocked by a administrator, so I probably would not think that requesting the page for may be necessary for now. If it continues again and it involves more than one IP address or new user, then semi protection is recommended. --Vmkcheat (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I pending protected it because of past history. --NeilN talk to me 14:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: High level of user vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 15:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Refreshing whole article by copy/pasting and erasing intermediate non-controversial minor alphabetical list sorting edits. Changing page style without consensus after over 5 years of consensus on style. Edit warring. Checkingfax (talk) 08:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Musa Talk  09:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 10:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Allow template editors. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 23:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correct cascade protection. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 00:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected per below, nothing can be done given it is cascading off the main page. Courcelles (talk) 02:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Allow TE. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 23:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correct level - cascade protection. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 00:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected For the bot. Cascaded off the main page, so no can do. Courcelles (talk) 02:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – This template is locked for template editors, despite showing the red lock. Not a major issue, but it should be the right protection level. . -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 22:48, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See WP:PROTECT, the dark red indicates indefinite full-protection, which is intentional. We're talking nearly 2.5 million transclusions – I think it's okay if we restrict editing to sysop-only MusikAnimal talk 03:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Wrong protection level, template editors allowed . -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 22:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Per above. The cascading protection was intentional MusikAnimal talk 03:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Wrong, level, allow template editors . -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 23:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined WP:REDLOCK as it is used in system messages. MusikAnimal talk 03:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page seemed to be in the progress of a very slow edit war that has occurred for a long time. Try temporary protection, and if that doesn't work, do indef. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 18:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For whatever reason, there has been a slew of IP users the last couple of days adding the wrong month for the article subject's death. The coroner's report came out yesterday, which seems to have triggered interest in the article from unregistered users. Temporary protection requested for a few days until the fervor dies down. -- WV 01:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued violation of WP:BLP. Chamith (talk) 03:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 3 months, PC 1 year NeilN talk to me 05:33, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP edit-warring and IP sockpuppetry, unresponsive to explanations of WP:BRD. Softlavender (talk) 04:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: By the way, both IPs 70.91.216.5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and 2601:182:C001:AAD1:ACF9:D78E:C819:213C (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) admit to being socks of each other; both have made 3 reverts each so far within a total of 7 hours (as of this writing). Should probably both be blocked for edit-warring and for socking to evade 3RR. Softlavender (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – One more for the correct protection level . -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 22:59, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should consult protecting admin Mr. Stradivarius MusikAnimal talk 03:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. I had been meaning to change the protection back, actually. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Grave dancing by an IP-hopping sockpuppet. - MrX 14:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, [38] Airplaneman 23:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Gparyani (talk) 16:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Only created twice, both times about 8 hours ago now. If it continues, please re-request. Airplaneman 23:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

indef semi protection for all the obvious BLP reasons including the current only-slightly-veiled IP doxxing threat. Please also nuke those comments from the history. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Courcelles (talk) 02:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Boyconga278 (talk) 10:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism of the release date. Ongoing for over 24 hours. X201 (talk) 18:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gadfium.. Courcelles (talk) 02:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Not protected at all. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 23:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected. Courcelles (talk) 02:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Really? What evidence do you have that this protection is necessary? The Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions was intentionally left unprotected so that anyone could add to it. And why was there no posting about this on the module's talk page? I think that Editor Courcelles should remove the protection and only reapply it if there is evidence to suggest that the protection is necessary.
Trappist the monk (talk) 02:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon editors keep vandalizing this article which sometimes is overlooked by vandal fighters. SMS Talk 08:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – was a logged in user, but not IPs are adding the same unsourced info. Violates WP:CRYSTAL and WP:TVUPCOMING. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavily vandalized by many users, but only today. Short semiprotect should be enough. Ashenai (talk) 19:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Run-of-the-mill vandalism by IP(s), even helpfully announced on their own Twitter account. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Airplaneman 23:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin closure restored. Closure was earlier reverted by a participant in violation of WP:NACD. Notifying here per the same. Regards—JAaron95 Talk 16:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Jaaron95: Nothing to do here. NeilN talk to me 17:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: Does this— Notice of the restoration should be posted at WP:RFPP. WP:NACD mean nothing? Regards—JAaron95 Talk 17:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Jaaron95: I have no idea why that is there but will find out. --NeilN talk to me 17:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've just been looking into this, I assume it was meant to link to WP:ANRFC, which is what I've now changed it to. RFPP makes no sense. Sam Walton (talk) 17:59, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Samwalton9 and NeilN: Do you want me to make another notice at WP:ANRFC? Regards—JAaron95 Talk 18:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Near constant vandalism, similar to related article Call of Duty: Black Ops II. -- ferret (talk) 19:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 19:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for longer than the previous protection that ran from August 18-25. If it's not nationalists on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian issue, it's garden-variety vandals as have infested the article today. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

05 September 2015

Semi-protection: Longterm disruption--persistent removal of sourced content and insertion of invented text, unsupported by sources. I've reported the IP at vandalism noticeboard, and left numerous notices on their talk page, to no avail. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B169:DAFB:E15A:DBC4 (talk) 14:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 16:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Disgusted by the lack of "Adding false information (semi)" on my Twinkle window. Anyway, people keep changing the phrase "Jessie J" with "Kelly Clarkson" despite many many sources saying "Jessie J", including several listed - help?. Launchballer 19:47, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:44, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I.P. Vandals continue to add unsoured/poorly soured info. Digifan23 (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:47, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Ongoing edit war about presentation of table content with the article not even having a talk page for a discussion to progress, plus sporadic IP vandalism. —烏Γ (kaw), 20:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated section blanking by IP editor. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 20:51, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP genre-warring. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 20:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:51, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – http://www.digplanet.com/wiki/Beauchamp_Duff

This is a hack site that is copying genuine Wikipedia pages. Surely this is plagiarism and fraud and this must be criminal. Justin Grant-Duff 12:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Declined @Jgrantduff: Not a hack site, see WP:MIRROR NeilN talk to me 15:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Still needs protection – vandalism recured after protection expired, probably related to the upcoming presidential election on 6 September. --RJFF (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rlendog (talk) 19:31, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of vandalism from IPs/SPAs due to this article being Today's Featured Article on the Main Page. Shearonink (talk) 17:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:26, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Bob K31416 (talk) 17:33, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every year during this annual event, disgruntled IPs driveby on vandalism runs. Need to lock it down at least through this weekend until event is over. I'm not fan of the Air Show either - live on the flightpaths - but this is ridiculous. Echoedmyron (talk) 18:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rlendog (talk) 19:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I also blocked two IPs who moved on from vandalizing this page to also vandalizing user talk pages. Rlendog (talk) 19:33, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Italian IP hopper continually blanking large sections. Doug Weller (talk) 18:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarah (talk) 19:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three IPs and a new editor all adding the same "don't cry, craft!" joke in the past few hours. McGeddon (talk) 18:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rlendog (talk) 19:08, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page is constantly being edited by an anonymous vandal with a morphing IP, so that whenever its current IP is blocked, it then hops to a new IP and continues with its vandalisms and edit warring on as though nothing happened. Furthermore, the vandal is extremely persistent, and always returns to vandalize the page with its blatant original research and petulant edit summaries once the current page protection has expired, like clockwork.--Mr Fink (talk) 15:26, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mr Fink, see Talk:Pete_(Disney)#Cat.2FWolf.2FRat. I remember this coming up a few months ago and the IP was unjustly blocked (IMO) as a vandal. It's be easier to justify a semi if the disputed fact was properly sourced. NeilN talk to me 15:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
comment: As I mentioned on your talkpage, it's been my personal experience that the IP editor has neither the ability nor desire to discuss anything, let alone provide a source for his claims. I mean, I actually have asked him, repeatedly, to provide a source, and he refuses each time, either because he does not understand what I'm saying, or that he has no desire to support his claims beyond repeatedly saying he said so, or to stop reverting him because he said so.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated attacks by IPs over past two days, including unsourced additions of death. : Noyster (talk), 16:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:16, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Valenciano (talk) 17:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed soon after previous protection expired. Everymorning (talk) 14:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IP addresses. Possible roaming user. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 15:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - over the past few days and also in light of the fact that this is the Labor/Labour Day holiday weekend... Shearonink (talk) 15:26, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:44, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive amendments being made to this living person's playing statistics by multiple IPs. Exxy (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by various IP users. ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 11:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:26, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An extremely long winded edit war seems to have continued after protection stopped. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 13:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jimfbleak. NeilN talk to me 15:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent additions of ceiling-fan BS by socks of a long-term troll . Everymorning (talk) 13:56, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mike Rosoft. NeilN talk to me 15:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dab page, should not be edited heavily. Subject to vandalism because of inclusion in the book Paper Towns. Conifer (talk) 04:12, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined turned the disambiguation into a redirect with a hat note at the book article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeated creation here and at User:Ogik Francis Peter of the user's resume. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:08, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Offending editors (and there were only a couple) were never warned or blocked before the page was locked. This page was prematurely locked. Please lower protection to semi/1RR. Chaos can be easily handled with selective warnings/blocks. Wikipedia is supposed to be the encyclopedia "that anybody can edit." Thank you. Checkingfax (talk) 04:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see where you asked Doc James about this before coming here. And there is no real need to warn anybody before protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks User:CambridgeBayWeather for the notification. The comment that there is no group editing of this article is justification for the protection. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:55, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
CambridgeBayWeather, Other Admins that monitor this page would disagree with you. Their philosphy is escalation from: do nothing > warning > block > ban > lock, always striving for the lowest barrier to editing.
Here is where I made the block deescalation request to Doc James: Talk:Planned Parenthood 2015 undercover videos controversy#Please lower page protection and warn.2Fblock warring editors. Checkingfax (talk) 07:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And that is fine there is no hard and fast rule here. I believe that locking a page when people are arguing over something is much better than blocking. If blocked they can't put forward their opinion on the talk page. If they can express their views then it is possible that consensus can be reached. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:40, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The two warriors should be warned first;then blocked; can discuss on their own talkpage with pings if they need an outlet. Please de-escalate the lock on this page to semi/1RR so the page can mature gracefully. Thank you. Checkingfax (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with CambridgeBayWeather that protecting is preferable here; content discussion should take place at the article talk page where all editors can follow it and blocking editors prevents this. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 23:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection : Content dispute/edit warring for the height of the players. Persistent disruptive edits for months now. -–Angelo6397 T A L K! 15:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it looks like right now it seems to be at a medium risk. Template protection would be needed if a template is in high risk of damage or dispute. Discuss the information on the talk page, and if it persists, then template protection may be necessary.Vmkcheat (talk) 16:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:21, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by the user with IP 78.133.27.179. It's a well known user from Malta which made vandalism editions before (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:78.133.67.226) and every time uses different static IPs. Always edits the same kind of articles; which are climate related articles. HardstyleGB (talk) 18:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this seems like a judgement if it is by a simple unregistered user, then it is best to block the IP indefinitely and add either PC to the requested articles, while the other IP addresses and new users can still edit the pages you are requesting protection on can get their changes edited. If administration find it necessary after blocking the suspected IP address user, then they can semi protect it, thus not allowing new and unregistered users to edit, even if they are making faithful edits, forcing them to use the talk page instead. I'd rather say Block the IP address and add Pending Changes for a while (I most can go for a month), thus allowing edits to be reviewed unless this continues with others, and then semi could be good. Vmkcheat (talk) 23:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 78.133.27.179 (talk · contribs) blocked by Swarm. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:44, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by the user with IP 78.133.27.179. It's a well known user from Malta which made vandalism editions before (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:78.133.67.226) and every time uses different static IPs. Always edits the same kind of articles; which are climate related articles. HardstyleGB (talk) 18:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 78.133.27.179 (talk · contribs) blocked by Swarm. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:45, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition by anons of unsourced claims regarding caste origin. Sitush (talk) 08:55, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user is repeatedly adding unsourced content and adding fake names to the cast of the article. --- Metal121 (talk) 10:10, 5 September 2015 (GMT)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism after the link was tweeted about by a popular youtuber. Angelcupcakeanna (talk) 11:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. Oddly enough not because I saw it her but through recent changes. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:21, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IP constantly removes Hispanic from results stating it is not a race. Of course, we go by sources and sources list Hispanic in results. Dave Dial (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mdann52 (talk) 17:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: WP:OR/WP:SYNTH problems regarding a BLP's full name. Previous semi-protection was for 6 months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:47, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kiwi128 (talk) 00:44, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep removing material about a notable person that has cited backup on its article page, and they refuse to explain themselves. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 01:12, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated and unexplained removal of info from IPs. Zappa24Mati 01:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cyclonebiskit. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been on the receiving end of quite a bit of IP vandalism. APerson (talk!) 03:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article has a long-term history of POV-warring from sockpuppets. Currently IP editor(s) are repeatedly adding the same falsehoods to article and not discussing factual accuracy on talk page. They're also messing up section headers. -- haminoon (talk) 09:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:25, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors removing sourced content to add non-neutral claims, such as: "The mountain which belongs to this village is known as "Great mountain" or "Bjeshka e madhe" in the beautiful albanian language." and "The infrastructure is really good, the roads are asphalted, there exists the sewage system, very decent internet connection." Edit warring over such content over the past two days. ScrpIronIV 13:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Faizan (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This page is consistent of disruptive fighting between sourced and unsourced. I best agree with either temporary or indefinite, but I don't know if all of the ones causing this war can be blocked, or if the page can indefinitely be pending changes added, so I'd rather go the easier way and do a semi protection that is indefinite for good faithful editors that can prove what is true about this subject. Vmkcheat (talk) 14:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there has been persistent edit-warring there. The IP has been warring with several accounts, and has not tried to use the talk page, per WP:ONUS. Till now, the IP's edit is the latest revision. So I would suggest indefinite protection too. This may help in resolving the dispute at the talk. Faizan (talk) 15:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is another thing to be noted, that's the IPs appeared after the user Astral Prince was blocked and was also reported to be socking. Both of them have same motive and almost all the IPs appear to be from the same ISP and area. Faizan (talk) 15:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to Faizan, people who do edit warring to attempt to get a point across usually risk getting banned by administration. There is no possible good faith when some IP users or new users who wish to put a good faith edit would be forced to lose such a priviledge to edit a article when they can prove in good faith that the information could be put on a talk page and be reviewed. There is many possible options, but there isn't a whole lot of things that can be done, usually administration can add pending changes for new and unregistered users, in which a administrator can review and accept confirmed information, along with the main reviewers of the site, but think about it, if it is disruptive and semi is necessary, then any new or unregistered wikipedia user that can make a good faith edit for the article you're requesting would need to talk to a administrator or a user who's autoconfirmed in order for them to make such edit. It is up to administration to decide, but I recommend blocking the IP address of the people doing such and then protecting the page (Either PC or Semi, whichever works best) and hope the admin provides the reason. Vmkcheat (talk) 15:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There is no way I'm going to go from never being protected to indefinite. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:31, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent sockpuppetry from IP socks of Giovannigiulio. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 14:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:33, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, with racial slurring, by four IPs. Richard Harvey (talk) 09:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and a few blocks, and 6 months PC. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism since previous semi-protection expired. Prefall 01:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Xymmax for two weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 05:33, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 14:57, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Drmies for one month. tutterMouse (talk) 05:35, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous editing by various IPs who seem to hold an agenda that some information is false. This is going to get messy; the only way to stop this is to protect the page. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 16:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Chillum for two weeks. tutterMouse (talk) 05:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection : Content dispute for definition of the term. Persistent disruptive edits for months now.Xxjkingdom (talk) 10:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 12:43, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Increasing level of IP vandalism, probably schoolkids now that school is starting. Over once a day in the last ten days, a week of pp should do it. Jusdafax 00:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending extended to a week beyond that. NeilN talk to me 01:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Human3015Send WikiLove  01:12, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:26, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP changing translation of the article which goes against what the source provided states. Erick (talk) 23:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 13:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring. 86.157.105.59 (talk) 17:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 19:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring. 86.157.105.59 (talk) 17:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 19:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring. 86.157.105.59 (talk) 17:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 19:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring. 86.157.105.59 (talk) 17:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 19:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An anon has been edit warring to add an unsupported genre to the article. Either block anon or please lock the article for say a week. Thanks. I'm done reverting though. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if a IP based wikipedia user is making this kind of edit, the user can either be blocked or pending changes can be added, in which it would be subject to review rather than forcefully prevent trusted IP address users and new users who have registered a account from making good faithful edits, but that is left up to the administration to decide which is better, in which I would rather advise all the edits to be subject to a review to promote compliance with unsourced or poorly sourced content rules, in which content has to be sourced so the page is more accurate and the information is more reliable if sourced. --Vmkcheat (talk) 12:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I'm loathe to protect against one editor. I've given them a WP:3RR warning so please use WP:ANEW if they start reverting again. I should note that their addition might be sourced in the article itself but that is something for discussion to decide. NeilN talk to me 12:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long section of OR added by IP and a new registered editor. No response to warnings or invitation to discuss. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 11:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 12:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Winner 42 Talk to me! 18:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 181.30.26.160/28 NeilN talk to me 18:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding teams before they are qualified. A week would be good... Kante4 (talk) 15:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Continued and persistent edit-warring. . RGloucester 16:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced edits as well as vandalism, with a lot of matches until wednesday. Qed237 (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP adding bogus "jihadism" category. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 19:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed shortly after protection expired on August 27. . Everymorning (talk) 21:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarah (talk) 21:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Article already exists at correct name Big Nate Goes for Broke . Murry1975 (talk) 15:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Murry1975, please try actually talking to the other editor and explaining the issue. NeilN talk to me 16:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit warring while both parties are on AN/I over this page and others. AlbinoFerret 19:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep coming by and removing Paulson's relationship to Cherry Jones and adding in a relationship to Lily Rabe. I don't know how many watchers this page has but I don't think it's very many active ones. Requesting temp protection. Dismas|(talk) 20:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP POV vandalism. An anonymous IP editor has constantly inserted information that is not in the cited source. He is putting in the infobox that 122 Saudi soldiers have been killed in the intervention, while the cited source only says 122 Saudis have died since the start of the war, without saying they are all military. The IP than speculated in his opinion (OR) that they are referencing to only soldiers and ignored the fact (which was quoted to him twice) the source itself says the figure includes civilians, albait unclear how many. He proceeded to make several reverts to the improperly cited info as seen here [39][40][41] with the last revert totally ignoring the quote confirming the figure includes civilians. PS His last revert also canceled multiple other edits by another editor (in essence it was a mass revert). The IP editor in question has also made a few more unexplained reverts of a few other editors over the last couple of days. EkoGraf (talk) 19:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarah (talk) 19:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – A couple IP addresses have been making unsourced changes to the article, one gave the rationale that "A book is not source of proof, I tell you now that the book is lie. I'm truth telling you is correct" in reference to Simon Sebag Montefiore's Young Stalin. Page could use some temporary protection. Cannolis (talk) 19:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarah (talk) 19:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced edits. Qed237 (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 19:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 10 July 2013. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 17:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No issue, Done Mark Arsten (talk) 19:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of a BLP article by an IP hopping vandal. Requesting PC1 to stop this. Ravensfire (talk) 16:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to request this too, but might I suggest we raise it to semi-protection for a few days instead? (Non-administrator comment) Mz7 (talk) 16:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism for Ip ranges. Some of the deceitful edits have to be corrected. Quantumor (talk) 18:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarah (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 12 September 2010. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 18:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 7 August 2008. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 18:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 26 July 2008. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 18:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 11 January 2012. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 18:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 23 November 2009. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 18:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – The person(s) continue to put in false facts (Jonah Halper has nothing to do with JCorps or 12gurus and never did), the organization is STILL active (not "formerly" active), etc. This was a problem with the Ari Teman page that had to be deleted and a lawsuit initiated. Let's be clear that saying a volunteer network is no longer active when it is is clearly intended to damage it and its ability to operate, recruit, and fundraise, so Wikipedia needs to stop this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.168.227.138 (talk) 10:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not fully protecting your preferred version. NeilN talk to me 14:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple IPs edit warring over the use of a subjective adjective. John from Idegon (talk) 13:08, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 14:18, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: Page was semi-protected on 3 Sep for persistent disruptive editing via rumors for the List of Protected Games. After semi-protection was enacted, an autoconfirmed user that has not logged in to edit for 6 years made another edit that subsequently had to be reverted. I am kind of hesitant to recommend it be protected this far since this is a relatively dynamic article and is likely to have valid edits spanning over the six months, especially near the end of the year holidays. But the rumors are not likely to go away either. Thanks. Inomyabcs (talk) 13:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Way too premature for full protection. Warn editors and open an WP:SPI if you suspect socking. NeilN talk to me 14:14, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been full protected since 19 July 2008. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 16 June 2008. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:14, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 8 March 2009. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 17:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:14, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 24 October 2007. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 17:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 26 March 2007. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 8 March 2009. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 17:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 17 June 2011. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 17:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 22 October 2011. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 18:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 11 May 2009. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 18:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 18:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

indefinite semi long-running targets of socking and fan wars.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Karanvir Bohra Semi-protected for 2 weeks by Mike V (initally 24 hours by Huon) and Karan Singh Grover Semi-protected by Slakr for 1 week. tutterMouse (talk) 16:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Repeated edits by one registered user who is trying to change page name, remove large sections of academically-referenced material, and add poorly referenced sections of their own. They are acting unilaterally and have not responded to requests from myself and another user to take their proposed changes to the Talk Page first, instead engaging in edit warring. I believe that a period of Full Protection may be the best way to deal with this. Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Midnightblueowl: Please watch WP:3RR NeilN talk to me 15:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 15:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – 2 month protection expired 2 days ago, and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atomic Meltdown immediately returned to socking. Nymf (talk) 09:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article topic is political in nature - current political controversy in the news is attracting tedious/pointless IP vandalism - request one week semi protection. -- Callinus (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Bentogoa (talk) 10:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 11:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same sockmaster revisiting this article directly after previous protection had expired. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Baseballman93.100. Binksternet (talk) 16:25, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Binksternet, the page is already sem-protected. Did you want it increased or removed? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like protection should be increased, because of socks. And protection should be extended in time. I guess I was wrong about "previous protection had expired", because the listed sock account was able to edit the article a few hours before the previous protection was scheduled to expire. Binksternet (talk) 05:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sarah (talk) 02:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... Someone did not sign this request. By the way, the vandalism has not been great within each week of disruption. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 04:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: High level of IP vandalism, most of it involving his role as the new Spiderman. Ebyabe talk - Inspector General05:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He's in a contract dispute, which seems to have prompted unsourced/dubious edits (about changing teams) all night. EricEnfermero (Talk) 06:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon and new accounts keep adding promotional material for commercial product ZipMagic. It's been reverted by multiple other editors, and warnings have been given, but it doesn't seem to be working. Requesting page protection. Indrek (talk) 12:12, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 15:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestion, but I'm more concerned about the long-term problem of these sorts of promotional edits popping up every now and then, than the short-term problem of one anon edit warring. Indrek (talk) 18:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Saw the SPI case. Protected against socking. NeilN talk to me 05:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP user is persistently adding the non-notable legal name of this pseudonymous musician, possibly as a form of harassment. ParkerHiggins ( talk contribs ) 04:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Make it sysop-move-protected. If Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is sysop-move-protected, then why isn't this page sysop-move-protected?. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 04:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 06:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Apparently his doctor trying to limit his innings pitched a season after he had Tommy John surgery is akin to treason to the team for these fans. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of vandalism. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 02:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lots of incorrect info being constantly added, whether just ignorantly or to troll. TropicAces (talk) 05:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: This page has been vandalized again and again by those who always add Beast Wars: Transformers and Beast Machines: Transformers to the list of programs. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:56, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: I would also like to request that this page be indefinitely and fully protected from those who always add Beast Wars: Transformers and Beast Machines: Transformers to the list of programs. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated section blanking by IP editor. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 20:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:55, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism in genres.

07 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Telstra sock and Cablevision, Argentina-sock working together: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AndresHerutJaim#Clerk.2C_CheckUser.2C_and.2For_patrolling_admin_comments

and

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Telstra.2C_Australia_IP_vandalism. Huldra (talk) 01:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 15:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant attacks by various IP users over the past week. Areaseven (talk) 14:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending changes seems adequate for now. NeilN talk to me 15:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP user/s continue to edit against consensus. Adding entries unrelated to President Aquino's presidency (viral videos, celebrity scandals, deaths of irrelevant individuals). Probably an IP sockpuppetry by a indefinitely banned user.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Hariboneagle927, please let me know or re-report here if they show up with another IP. You may want to check their other contribs. NeilN talk to me 15:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Telstra sock and Cablevision, Argentina-sock working together: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AndresHerutJaim#Clerk.2C_CheckUser.2C_and.2For_patrolling_admin_comments

and

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Telstra.2C_Australia_IP_vandalism. Huldra (talk) 01:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 14:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Deli nk (talk) 16:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 18:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism including consistent blanking of the page. OldSkool01 (talk) 16:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 18:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done KrakatoaKatie 18:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done KrakatoaKatie 18:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done KrakatoaKatie 18:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done KrakatoaKatie 18:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done KrakatoaKatie 18:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. It would also be a good idea to upgrade the protection of Module:WikidataCheck accordingly. Alakzi (talk) 13:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done and Module:WikidataCheck Template protected. KrakatoaKatie 18:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done KrakatoaKatie 18:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done KrakatoaKatie 18:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple accounts attempting to create a lengthy promotional vehicle. Possible socking. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B169:DAFB:E15A:DBC4 (talk) 12:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:24, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Not a single edit to this page from new accounts or IPs in the last 3 months (c. 20) has been constructive - and earlier months don't look better. Please indef-semi to avoid wasting volunteers' time. GermanJoe (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – National editors adding wrong stuff like fyrom instead of macedonia. Kante4 (talk) 13:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP violations/vandalism from dynamic IP. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 15:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 1 week, PC 2 months NeilN talk to me 15:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations by multiple new accounts. Deli nk (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple new users. Deli nk (talk) 15:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP-hopping editor. Deli nk (talk) 15:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  07:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 10:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 11:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is under an attack of many newly created accounts and IPs that are vandalising (see: [42][43][44][45][46], those are just examples, there are much more). Vanjagenije (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Done a few hours ago. NeilN talk to me 14:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ViperSnake151  Talk  01:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. NeilN talk to me 10:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Boyconga278 (talk) 04:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Seriously Boyconga278, please stop making RFPP your first stop for these types of issues. Talk to the other editor or warn them. And please format your requests correctly. Adding "edit summaries" screws up the bot that maintains this page. NeilN talk to me 04:43, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: Ok, I'm understand. Thanks! Boyconga278 (talk) 05:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – I recently removed some content from the page and did some cleanup in good Faith. After TP discussion a consensus was reached about what to put in and what sources to use. however this seems to have attracted some vandals to the page. Requesting Silver lock to resume sane editing. . FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 08:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Protect: Some of the pages of Islam are facing continuous vandalism. It is one of them. ScholarM (talk) 08:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC won't do anything as users are established editors. @FreeatlastChitchat and ScholarM: Please engage the other editors. NeilN talk to me 10:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – The person(s) who are replacing references all the time by: 1. London Gazette entries only! 2.redirects of fully and complete articles for no reason. 3.people are deleting articles that are written in a way they do not like. . Justin Grant-Duff 09:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Declined, I do not see a single vandal edit in 2015.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: As this is the third such request I've seen recently, and they all smack of ownership, I've warned Jgrantduff against making future frivolous requests. NeilN talk to me 14:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 10:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Keeps being moved to "Myanmar", presumably as people think Myanma is a typo (it's actually the demonym) and on one occasion to "Burma" due to an editor being unhappy with the recent outcome of the Myanmar/Burma RM. Cheers, Number 57 09:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 10:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP / new-user vandalism. GoldenRing (talk) 09:43, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this article about an obscure Korean band has >150 edits in the last 24 hours, mostly from IP accounts, quite a bit (but not all) vandalism.
And this appears to be the start of the vandalism. GoldenRing (talk) 09:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 10:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, I've filed a sock puppet investigation here. I am concerned if there are any other lurking accounts, because this looks like another whitewashing PR case (like the Yank Barry incident). Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 10:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 21:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least make an attempt to contact the protecting admin, even if they are not that active. In this case MSGJ. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done by HJ Mitchell. tutterMouse (talk) 07:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article has been repeatedly spammed with the spam website abbywinters.co instead of abbywinters.com. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent unsourced additions.LM2000 (talk) 21:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Boyconga278 (talk) 00:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 00:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Presumably since this is today's featured article, it is getting a lot of vandalism. . Everymorning (talk) 03:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Changed to 12 hours NeilN talk to me 04:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued ongoing disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors. Continued addition of unreliable sourced content, and removal of content that is reliably sourced. livelikemusic my talk page! 15:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Prior to Presidential Election and General Elections, This article has been roughly vandalised by anti-Sirisena camp which they used to mess up the article without any reliable references (mostly with anti-Sirisena propaganda reference) that have been reverted multiple times. Therefore, I'm requesting temporary pending change protection for at least 2½ year in order avoid such situation transpiring in the future.

Please consider granting protection for this page as I and other editors are tirelessly monitoring this page from causing damage to his publicity. Thank you!. MONARCH Ask me 16:18, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protected because of vandalism seven years ago. 1 transclusion. Semi-protection might be a better option, due to its nature. Alakzi (talk) 21:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least make an attempt to contact the protecting admin, even if they are not that active. In this case MaxSem. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yawn - why contact me about such minorr thing? Did it look like I had a secret knowledge why it has to be kept protected? :P Also,  Done. Max Semenik (talk) 23:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 21:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least make an attempt to contact the protecting admin, even if they are not that active. In this case MSGJ. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:18, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 21:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least make an attempt to contact the protecting admin, even if they are not that active. In this case Happy-melon. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 21:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least make an attempt to contact the protecting admin, even if they are not that active. In this case Brian0918. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 21:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least make an attempt to contact the protecting admin, even if they are not that active. In this case Brian0918. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: Per WP:TPE, "any administrator may change the protection level for individual templates on request". This is common sense, as there is (was) a very large number of protected templates that need to be reduced to TE. Alakzi (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But this page above says, highlighted in yellow, "if the protecting admin is inactive or you have already asked them." CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That is exactly what the WP:TPE instructions aim to circumvent. A blanket reduction in protection from "full" to "template editor" to (nearly) all templates has been sanctioned by the community, and thus the opinion of the protecting admin is not typically solicited, as it would serve no purpose - but slow down a process that is quite laborious as it is. In fact, the second bullet point below the highlighted text reads: "Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first". Alakzi (talk) 22:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 21:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least make an attempt to contact the protecting admin, even if they are not that active. In this case HJ Mitchell. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Same as above. Alakzi (talk) 21:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least make an attempt to contact the protecting admin, even if they are not that active. In this case Winhunter. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Same as above. Alakzi (talk) 21:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least make an attempt to contact the protecting admin, even if they are not that active. In this case Winhunter. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated changes to player's squad number, sourced from Jelavić's official Twitter account and does not match the information on West Ham United's website. The club have yet to confirm Nikica Jelavić's squad number, with the player listed as jersey 0. Kő Cloch (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ged UK . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 13:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been fully protected since 18 October 2007. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 18:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Given that there have been no edits, or requests, since 2012 I wouldn't see that it needed reducing in protection. Kwamikagami, I see you originally protected this template (as Template:IPAEng) in 2007. So should this be reduced to template editor or stay as fully protected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: All high-use templates are template-protected, with very few exceptions (transcluded on the main page; transcluded on interface pages; or transcluded on an extremely large number of pages, typically over a million). {{IPA-en}} is deprecated in favour of {{IPAc-en}}, has only got a thousand transclusions, only 54 of which are in articles, and could reasonably be unprotected. Alakzi (talk) 22:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's not going to matter the templates stay protected for a few more days. If after three days the protecting admin has not replied, or edited, just let me know on my talk page and I will take care of them. Some of the admins edited today and they may have good reasons why the fully protected them. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not familiar with "template editor". If that's someone trusted to edit templates, then yes, it should be reduced to that level. It would probably be okay unprotected, but given that there are few articles that still use it, it could be quite a while before anyone realized it had been vandalized, and I'd feel better if it retained more than just IP protection. — kwami (talk) 22:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mind waiting, but can we just keep the requests here? Alakzi (talk) 22:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reduced to semi. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protected out of process in a long-resolved content dispute. Alakzi (talk) 13:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Grutness:--Ymblanter (talk) 15:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done Grutness...wha? 23:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: With 1 mainspace transclusion, I don't see why this template is protected. Alakzi (talk) 21:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HJ Mitchell. Alakzi (talk) 21:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08 September 2015

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same pov editing from Fars Province University of Medical Science and Health Care Services as before. Doug Weller (talk) 20:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism: incorrect information being entered, after subject was a worldwide trend on social medias. Jvck (talk) 21:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing --Suittheday (talk) 18:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There appears to have been nothing but IP editing for months. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term issues with disruptive editing. Pending changes doesn't seem to be helping. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP vandalism from multiple IP addresses, such that it has been escaping the attention of patrolling editors' watchlists. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 18:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection Request to have this WP:BIO WP:SALTED. It has been created and recreated three times in the last 11 months, each time being speedily deleted. LavaBaron (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is that better? -- Orduin Discuss 20:54, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected NeilN talk to me 21:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 21:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit war/content dispute. BMK (talk) 04:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks to have died down. If it starts up again, please let me know. NeilN talk to me 13:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 17:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I'm not sure if this is the correct place to ask but I was wondering if this could be Unsalted so I can redirect it to Mia McKenna-Bruce, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 16:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Davey2010 Have at it. NeilN talk to me 17:21, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thanks NeilN :) –Davey2010Talk 17:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Why idenfinite? I don't even eit my page and I like it protected. And yes I know I won't be able to edit it either. Krett12 (talk) 15:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Krett12, you can edit semi-protected pages. NeilN talk to me 15:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Did I say semi? I meant full. But I guess semi is OK too. Krett12 (talk) 17:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MusikAnimal. NeilN talk to me 15:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The article Ashley Boettcher was deleted 4 times for providing unreferenced and it was protected from page creation, This Actress is notability for child-actress in involved in roles such as: Aliens in the Attic, Judy Moody and the Not Bummer Summer and Allen (Prison Break), She is also currently acting for Television Show Gortimer Gibbon's Life on Normal Street as second lead child-actress. The article's draft was submitted at Draft:Ashley Boettcher. I have successfully reviewed this article and it has met minimum criteria of WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER was successfully passed, I'm requesting for unprotection for page creation in order to move the draft into main space. MONARCH 09:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Per a request on my talk page. MONARCH, you might have gotten a faster response if you had pinged RHaworth, the protecting admin. NeilN talk to me 15:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
NeilN Thank you, I didn't know about RHaworth's role as page protecting admin, I will next time remember him in case of urgent request… MONARCH 15:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
MONARCH, in case you are unaware, each page has a log (example) which shows what admin added the current protection. --NeilN talk to me 15:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
NeilN – I'm aware of that log, I have seen it, but i don't know whether its useful to ping one of that admin because some of them are not active, So i decided to come here and ask for unprotection which is fast because most recent admins are active here, sadly my request was ignored which forced me to search for the one who has made recent edits here as an administrator and it came out that was you, since you made most recent edits less than 30 minutes ago here. Thanks for your cooperation! MONARCH 15:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. E. Feld talk 14:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Quiet little backwater of an article seems to be collecting a variety of idiots this week. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 11:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 15:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Over the last few days, an evidently IP-hopping editor has made the same or similar non-constructive edits, including hatnotes to redlinks, that at least three registered editors have had to revert. Shows no sign of stopping.--Tenebrae (talk) 18:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:29, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:38, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I am seeing a possible sockpuppetry. Someone is making the same recent edit as before. Or maybe I'm uncertain, but the trend is coming back. George Ho (talk) 20:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:39, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs pushing unsourced content changes against WP:CRYSTAL. 2 weeks should cure to become official (no longer CRYSTAL). UW Dawgs (talk) 23:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP has been insisting on measuring these two basketball players height and weight using strictly metrics, and I think they should be measured in American units, but another user came up with a compromise that has metrics in the lead paragraph and American units in the infobox, which I thought was a good idea, so I instituted it with these two players. A discussion was also started at this thread on the Basketball WikiProject, and I keep insisting that the IP go to that and discuss it in a mature way, but they just won't listen. --Miamiheat631Talk 02:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Seems to be some content dispute that isn't being solved here and it's spilling over to the affected user(s) talk pages. Melody 06:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 10:21, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent adding of unsourced info by various IP users. Areaseven (talk) 12:28, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant changing to wrong team. TropicAces (talk) 22:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Frosty 00:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection edit warring/content dispute. IP making personal attacks on editors. Possible sockpuppetry. Citydude1017 (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tobias Bergemann (talk) 11:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. NeilN talk to me 13:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – high level of IP vandalism. RF23 (talk) 13:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:54, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block-evading IP reverting the same edits with incoherent HTML comment threats, over the last week or two. McGeddon (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:19, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts, this time by an IP user, to add MessesaryMist Bulacan, in addition to five deletions of the article MessesaryMist Bulacan and one deletion of MessesaryMist bulacan. —Largo Plazo (talk) 09:54, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – pov editing by 2 IPs from Virginia followed by a new account, adding identical material such as " The Talmud, which is accepted by most "whites" of the world's Jewish community is blasphemous towards Yahshua" and other claims. I've given the account a 3RR warning and I'm not sure if protection is the best thing or just blocking this editor now or when they revert again. Doug Weller (talk) 10:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs, changing legitimate content and adding possibly general attacking content. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 10:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: going to be the main page soon, should probably be semiprotected. Krett12 (talk) 03:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Also, the code will be copied over to the main page, rather than the page itself being moved, so the protection won't move with it. And when the code is actually on the main page it will be cascade-protected anyway, so the current protection level doesn't really matter. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 04:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  04:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined TheRedPenOfDoom's edits are perfectly fine - your additions of copyrighted material and unsourced quotations are not. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sadly, all topics related to poo seem to be the subject of regular vandalism, e.g. people postings videos showing themselves or their friends defecating. It is such a waste of time to deal with those disruptive edits. EvM-Susana (talk) 06:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block-evading IP making edits with incoherent HTML comment threats, over the last week or two. McGeddon (talk) 09:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Unambiguous promotion. McGeddon (talk) 12:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 13:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I know it's only one edit today, but the page came off of a two-week protection a few hours ago. -Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 20:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – --. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also request blocking all the Red accounts that were used to vandalise the page over the last few minutes. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Many blocks also handed out. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Blocks also handed out. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from TACOELF27]], TacoElf31, and various IP addresses making the same same edits. Wikky Horse (talk) 21:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I went for indefinite protection as the vandalism goes back years, and you can have user pages protected on request anyway. @Wikky Horse: If you really want the protection to be temporary, just let me know and I'll alter it for you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 04:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Frosty 00:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 04:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The page has only recently came off of protection within the last few days, but the same IP address (as before) is continuing to persistenly vandalise the page. This can be seen from the edit history, and as a result, it is like a constant edit war in which the perpetrator continues to vandalise the page over and over. -Metal121 talk 01:27, 8 September 2015 (GMT)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Resumption of IP vandalism and infrequent SPA issues, after expiration of the prior 3-month protection on Aug 19. UW Dawgs (talk) 23:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 02:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Conifer (talk) 02:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Unprotection: I want people to edit this common.js but its automatically protected without a reason i think wikipedia should unprotect this. A8v (talk) 23:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined — 1. This would require technical modifications that are infeasible; 2., because of the power afforded to anyone editing someone else's site-wide javascript, this is akin to requesting your account be allowed to be compromised. --slakrtalk / 00:08, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Optakeover(Talk) 07:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after unprotection. Conifer (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is slow but steady. Let's see how PC protection works. MelanieN (talk) 00:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 21:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least make an attempt to contact the protecting admin, even if they are not that active. In this case Hannibal. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Very high transclusion count (>50k), contains important information that shouldn't be edited at random, and is/was used as part of a WMF outreach initiative. All good reasons that changes should be discussed and made through an admin. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. I agree with HJ Mitchell.//Hannibal (talk) 10:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@HJ Mitchell and Hannibal: Isn't this exactly the kind of thing TE status was invented for? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 16:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. KrakatoaKatie 18:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by editor using at least three accounts and two IPs. (3 of 5 are blocked; others pending.) Puppet and socks treat article and peripherals as if Wiki is a fan site with no evidence s/he cares about policies, especially those governing N, OR and SYNTH. (Someone with more knowledge than I should also ckeck Tiffany Evans for policy vios.) —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 🖖 19:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ATinySliver is there a SPI? Looked at the edits - same articles but I'm looking for a "smoking gun". NeilN talk to me 20:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just finished it. My thanks. —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 🖖 21:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been semi - protected since 19 January 2011. An unprotection request to the protecting administrator was archived without action. Please unprotect. 86.134.217.255 (talk) 19:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pingingi HJ Mitchell again but it's not likely to be unprotected, it's attracted more than its fair share of disruptive bored kids making unconstructive edits over the years and racked up a lot of semi-protection periods up until being protected indefinitely. Some articles are just too high a liability given the sheer amount of disruption and editor time wasted patrolling it unprotecting would allow, this is one of them. tutterMouse (talk) 19:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I very rarely use indefinite semi protection, but this is one of those articles that simply isn't suitable for unprotection. The signal to noise ratio will go up significantly, destabilising the article and leading to gradual degradation. I'll leave this here for another admin to weigh in if they want, but I oppose unprotection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per HJ Mitchell. KrakatoaKatie 18:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

09 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 15:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 15:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 15:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 15:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 15:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 15:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP user's "reasoning" makes no attempt to explain the content removal, only the clarification request. Mdrnpndr (talk) 15:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see the IP editor in question has gone to the talkpage to discuss it, why aren't you there too? tutterMouse (talk) 15:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No disruptive editing except by people such as "Mdrnpndr" reverting clearly explained edits for no reason. 201.220.242.199 (talk) 15:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 15:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Today's is the 8th attack in a fortnight by a "Dan and "Phil" vandal using different IPs and accounts. : Noyster (talk), 16:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 10 days, PC 2 months NeilN talk to me 16:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. An unknown user has changed correct information several times. Scheridon (talk) 16:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 96 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting an upgrade on this, as an IP was still able to make a pointless edit to the article and remove the pc tag. Hence, the article should be off-limits to IPs for a while. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 17:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until 1 October. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Had to refactor Rjd0060's response, bot wouldn't ever archive this thinking 21 days from now it'll be protected. tutterMouse (talk) 19:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

temporary semi a dynamic IP attempting to have the article inappropriately present that there is any part of mainstream academics that doesnt this Parapsychology is a sham in violation of WP:ASSERT -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All edits in the 12 or so hours since this was unprotected are vandalism and the reversion of said vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – I think four times is enough? Could we protect against recreation for, say, a year?. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Easy enough to unprotect if a good draft ever appears NeilN talk to me 16:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Unused. Alakzi (talk) 14:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ping Zzuuzz, since I'm supposed to do this. Alakzi (talk) 14:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected ping Alakzi. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for 1 year: Persistent vandalism. JayJ47 (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing on article and associated Talk page – The recent IP-hopping editor's "reasoning" makes no attempt to explain the content removal or unsourced insertions; the IP is also now resorting to editor attacks. Xenophrenic (talk) 16:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 15:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 15:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing For the last couple of months someone using only IP address just wont stop changing the articles to less quality articles. Not clear vandalism, but a lot of spelling errors and lots of untrue facts. --Suittheday (talk) 18:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: CambridgeBayWeather declined these earlier today NeilN talk to me 21:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: CambridgeBayWeather declined these earlier today NeilN talk to me 21:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
NeilN did you look at the articles. There has been nothing but IPs doing the editing, a few odd edits from Suittheday, and it is impossible to tell the good from the bad CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
CambridgeBayWeather, yes I looked at the initial request and came to the same conclusion you did. Decided to leave it for you senior admins :) --NeilN talk to me 23:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also an important Wikipedia page (with high visibility, such as originating from disputes of other users). Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 14:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 14:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 14:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 14:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 14:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 14:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 14:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: One mainspace transclusion; certainly not a WP:HRT. The protecting admin is banned. Alakzi (talk) 14:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected NeilN talk to me 14:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: One mainspace transclusion; certainly not a WP:HRT. The protecting admin is inactive. Alakzi (talk) 14:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected NeilN talk to me 14:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: One mainspace transclusion; certainly not a WP:HRT. The protecting admin is inactive. Alakzi (talk) 14:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected NeilN talk to me 14:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A highly visible redirect that had been vandalised many times by IPs and new users. 115.188.176.136 (talk) 08:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The page hasn't been touched for nearly a week. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Random IPs keep dropping the same vandalism into the article. . — Maile (talk) 12:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection (from full to semi): Article is fully protected for no apparent reason, I asked on the talk page but the protecting admin might have their pings turned off or for some other reason didn't answer. The reason given by the last admin was "Try FP again. Semi isn't working." but I really don't see how that's true. Recently (as "recent" as August is now) there has only been one editor making problematic edits on that article (the problem with that article is that some people want to add non-notable sites to that list). — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 13:38, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Jeraphine Gryphon, please post to the protecting admin's talk page, not the article's talk page. NeilN talk to me 15:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Competing agendas in edit war. BeowulfBrower (talk) 06:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection until 5:30 BST today before anyone else tries to jump the gun and say Elizabeth II has reigned for longer than Queen Victoria. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 8 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JayJ47 (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection for one week: I think a jump from no protection to indefinite full protection was a bit much. From the talk page conversation started yesterday, it looks as though the debate had already died down even before the page was protected. I've messaged the protecting admin and he said to come here with a link to both conversations.Cebr1979 (talk) 22:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested protection under the impression that the issue was still active; but it appears the protecting admin used indef instead of the temporary that was requested, not sure if there was a reason for that or just an honest mistake. Melody 01:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Unprotected. OK try having it unprotected. Indefinite was an error as it was supposed to be a week. The bot is fine as it was just say the article was protected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High risk image currently used in {{OW}}, which is under template protection due to its extensive usage. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SaməkTalk 05:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SaməkTalk 05:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous IP user(s) continuously reverting changes without discussion, despite requests to discuss on talk page. Lcmortensen (mailbox) 05:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 02:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Or WP:BLPN or WP:ANEW. Other editor is autoconfimed NeilN talk to me 03:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 02:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Or WP:BLPN or WP:ANEW. Other editor is autoconfimed NeilN talk to me 03:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: - I recently restored a passage on the lack of accreditation of this university in the United States. The deleted material is sourced to multiple government documents and websites that affirm it lacks U.S. accreditation. In investigating it further, I found that this information had been stripped out of the article multiple times before. The US accreditation issues are discussed on the talk page going back to 2007. Based on this pattern, I believe that persons affiliated with this university are sweeping the article of factual information that reflects negatively on its current lack of academic accreditation. There have been a number of problems with this article's quality in the past according to its talk page, including frequent observations that edits read like promotional materials for the school. I think it would be helpful and appropriate if a moderator would place this page under semi-protection to prevent it from being used as a promotional tool by the subject of the article. - Quelfie (talk) 21:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Quelfie: Self-promotional edits are of course a problem, but it doesn't look like there have been that many of them recently. If you see more problems, it might be a good idea to start a new thread at WP:COIN. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:07, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JDDJS (talk) 02:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals systematically erasing references to prior history of this network before rebranding. ViperSnake151  Talk  04:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The rate of vandalism/blanking isn't really high enough to justify semi-protection, but the page is well-suited to pending changes, in my opinion. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 04:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and new user vandalism associated with the New York Mets. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:39, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:39, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting gold lock for a minimum of three months. IP vandals are a serious and daily occurrence, and some editors with confirmed accounts come out to disrupt as soon as lock expires. Requesting three months so that discussion on TP reaches at least some consensus. . FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism right after pending changes expired. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Now that Washington Nationals and Bryce Harper are protected, the vandalism parade has moved here. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection - The stadium is currently subject to a naming rights deal, but that deal won't take effect until 1 January 2016. Therefore, no move should be implemented until at least that date. Even after that date, however, such a move will require discussion, as sponsored stadium names are not something that is currently endorsed by the rugby union, association football or cricket WikiProjects (i.e. the ones relating most to UK sport). – PeeJay 14:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well perhaps you'll reconsider in a couple of days. – PeeJay 19:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
PeeJay2K3 if it starts to be moved or there is editwarring over the 1 January name then protection could be used. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism from Bertrand101, adding several fake television and radio stations there. Israel's Son 23:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 00:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Philip J Fry (talk) 00:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Protection: Persistent vandalism unregistered users or vandalism users. TheBellaTwins1445 TheBellaTwins1445 3:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pokechu22 (talk) 22:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Virtually every day since Sept. 4, the same IP-hopping editor has been making the same unconfirmed tabloid-speculation edit. He is continually edit-warring with this WP:BLP and WP:NOTTABLOID vio. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism with unsourced genres. Anonpediann (talk) 16:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10 September 2015

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:38, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 1 week by Mkdw. tutterMouse (talk) 19:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Relentless addition of unsourced and peacock language by multiple IPs. I suspect it's mostly from one user, who works on a number of articles in a similarly fancruft-y fashion. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B41B:4FC1:242D:5468 (talk) 18:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 20:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We have had long-term problems with this article being used as a platform for fringe 'mind-control' conspiracy theories, and now have an IP edit-warring to include such material - almost certainly User:Baphy93 editing in evasion of a block. The related [Electronic harassment]] article was recently semi-protected for 6 months for the same reason. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Floquenbeam. KrakatoaKatie 20:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User page of blocked user being used to link attacks on external websites. VQuakr (talk) 19:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Not convinced he doesn't have socks out there. If another admin wishes to lower to semi, it's okay with me, but I see no need for others to edit that page. KrakatoaKatie 20:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute by IP with the intention to get changelogs remove for claimed copyvio. Fighting and warring with other IPs about this (on multiple similar articles). Unsure to which revision the article should be reverted before protection. Denniss (talk) 22:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:42, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection for a month or so. One anonymous editor with a dynamic IP has edit-warred for weeks to reinsert their (deficient) version of the plot summary, without participating in the talk page discussion at Talk:Steven Universe#Plot summary changes. This may be the same person who has edited in a similar uncommunicative and slightly obsessive mode in other TV cartoon series articles. I'm an admin, but editorially involved, and therefore shouldn't make the protection myself.  Sandstein  08:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:50, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another week please? People jumping the gun and adding teams before they are qualified or seeded. Kante4 (talk) 15:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced controversial labelling by Manolvd1999 and SPA socks, despite several warnings. See also stale ANI thread. GermanJoe (talk) 17:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced controversial labelling by Manolvd1999 and SPA socks, despite several warnings. See also stale ANI thread. GermanJoe (talk) 17:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An anon-IP with a history of edit-warring, who already has been blocked once this summer, is edit-warring at this article. He keeps adding, as I've explained to him, highly fannish WP:TONE violations as well as hyperbolic language that WP:FILM consensus has long discouraged in movie articles. He doesn't discuss, and rather than edit-war in return, I thought it best to pursue page protection. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:38, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. KrakatoaKatie 14:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same reason as above. Although now that 50.5.214.147 is expanding his edit-warring to more than one article, perhaps another block for him may be in order. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. KrakatoaKatie 14:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. 333-blue 13:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only 41 transclusions. KrakatoaKatie 14:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Some administrator, probably unaware of the RM two years ago, de-disambiguated the title twice. I talked to the administrator about this, but he removed my post as if I was "scolding" him. George Ho (talk) 08:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done You were scolding him - if you'd put that on my talk page, I'd likely react in a similar way. Admins aren't omniscient. We're people too. That said, move protection doesn't affect admins anyway, and David Levy has backed out of the issue. KrakatoaKatie 13:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. KrakatoaKatie 13:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: I understand that protecting TFA articles is part of WP:PEREN and generally would not be implemented, but given the nature of this article, running this article as TFA on September 11 without any protection may create some risk for Wikipedia. I think that, at the very least, pending changes protection for when this article is on the main page would be appropriate. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 11:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done We run lots of articles like this as the TFA on the anniversaries of their occurrence or the birthday of the subject. There are always lots of eyes on the TFA. If it gets bad, we'll deal with it then. :-) KrakatoaKatie 13:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous semi-protection was for three months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Courcelles (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandal is inserting nonsense into the article [47]. Request semi-protection for a week. WCMemail 16:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Courcelles (talk) 17:27, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Rockypedia (talk) 19:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.  Sandstein  10:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of vandalism and edit warring (see [48]). Quis separabit? 19:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Edit-warring involves mostly registered editors. Issuing EW warnings to all.  Sandstein  10:40, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 14:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the past couple of days. DH85868993 (talk) 05:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 14:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hello admin, there have been five attempts by anonymous users to blank section of this article. Can you please protect this page for 30 days? Many thanks. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection : Declined
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 13:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:21, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Jenks24 KrakatoaKatie 13:43, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent addition of unsourced information, removal of relevant reliably sourced information, and edit warring by IPs. Attempted to find good sources for info IPs added, but found none.Katzenlibrary (talk) 18:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  Sandstein  10:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I am seeing reverts lately. I couldn't tell whether most of them are vandalism. George Ho (talk) 08:11, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one edit since September 7 (when protection may have been warranted). Cyclonebiskit (talk) 08:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There is vandalism and edit warring. As this is a certified good article, I feel this is needed to prevent the article's GA recognition from being put at risk and/or removed. Other users are also trying to prevent the vandalism being made to the article, but like myself, they are finding it very hard to have to constantly watch over the article to prevent any vandalism. Metal121 (talk) 07:16, 10 September 2015 (GMT)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  Sandstein  10:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Another spate of content removal from this controversial bio article, this time from a Government of Canada IP. A minor test edit was done yesterday Sept 8., and then blanking today. . Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 02:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User Veera dheera sooran repeatedly editing to his version . not considering other admins words .. . Calicutspecialist (talk) 22:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 02:51, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Reiterated vandalism by unregistered user/ users. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 5:10, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. TheBellaTwins1445, you have three requests for protection for the same page. One is enough. NeilN talk to me 00:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 01:43, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 02:48, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An unregistered editor is persistently adding unsourced (negative) information without any attempt at discussion in Talk. (I have not left him or her any User Talk messages because he or she frequently changes IP addresses.) ElKevbo (talk) 04:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Indefinitely. Fluctuating IP coming back over a period of months to add unsourced negative material. EdJohnston (talk) 05:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Targetted with persistent vandalism. Richard Harvey (talk) 23:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 00:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Continued vandalism after block. - Aoidh (talk) 02:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism related to his poor in game decisions. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Poor guy is even getting bashed in RFPP reports! NeilN talk to me 03:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More disruptive IP edits. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism today by several IP users. Donner60 (talk) 20:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I would recommend around 6 months, most IP editors are making unconstructive or vandalistic edits on the article, many ignoring invisible comments that tell them not to change his age without a proper source. AmaryllisGardener talk 21:07, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A very popular target in the past few days. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High traffic article. High level of vandalism from new accounts and IPs. -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:10, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A well known user from Malta which makes vandalized edits everyday in the same articles and with different Malta static IPs, and it's banned from 2 different IPs so it's making a block evasion. Now uses a Netherlands Proxy (there is full of them in the Chrome Web Store) to make those editions because his IPs are banned. This user now is using this IP: 188.166.8.88 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) but he is banned from this IP: 46.11.61.241 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and this IP: 78.133.27.179 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). HardstyleGB (talk) 20:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. NeilN talk to me 01:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A well known user from Malta which makes vandalized edits everyday in the same articles and with different Malta static IPs, and it's banned from 2 different IPs so it's making a block evasion. Now uses a Netherlands Proxy (there is full of them in the Chrome Web Store) to make those editions because his IPs are banned. This user now is using this IP: 188.166.8.88 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) but he is banned from this IP: 46.11.61.241 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and this IP: 78.133.27.179 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). HardstyleGB (talk) 20:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. NeilN talk to me 01:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IPs adding a non-existent daughter to this BLP. - MrX 22:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:43, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Almost constant vandalism and BLP violations since the article was created. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 00:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As soon as the previous protection expired the edit-warring and vandalism have started anew. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 23:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 00:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:38, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Was given PC during the 2010 trial, which was then changed to indefinite semi-protection afterwards. No prior history of protection. Conifer (talk) 17:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Let's see how this goes. Conifer, can you keep an eye on it? NeilN talk to me 22:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Put it on my watchlist. Conifer (talk) 00:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editor(s) disruptive adding then removing a correct category. Spshu (talk) 13:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This is a BLP for a Canadian politician. An IP has twice changed so a link points to an unofficial site. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:07, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:07, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is having problems with IPs either taking out sourced material, altering material that contradicts an IC in the article, or putting in unsourced material. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of rotating IP vandalism and edit warring. LuckyLouie (talk) 19:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A well known user from Malta which makes vandalized edits everyday in the same articles and with different Malta static IPs, and it's banned from 2 different IPs so it's making a block evasion. Now uses a Netherlands Proxy (there is full of them in the Chrome Web Store) to make those editions because his IPs are banned. This user now is using this IP: 188.166.8.88 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) but he is banned from this IP: 46.11.61.241 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and this IP: 78.133.27.179 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). HardstyleGB (talk) 20:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11 September 2015

Full protection: Restore permanent protection since template protection doesn't function on cascade-protected pages. Steel1943 (talk) 04:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Restore permanent protection since template protection doesn't function on cascade-protected pages. Steel1943 (talk) 04:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs adding "Unreliable Sources" template; failing to discuss at Talk page despite multiple requests to do so. DonIago (talk) 12:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – School-related subject, and with the start of the school year vandalism is up again. Altamel (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JayJ47 (talk) 08:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently multiple British school districts must be covering Lancastrian/Tudor history because various schoolchildren using school IPs and thinking that they are ohsoclever have vandalized this article. Multiple times. Over the past few days. Shearonink (talk) 14:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant disruptive edits from IP-editors and section blanking. The article is currently under Talk page discussion for GAR renomination preparations, and IP-editors have been getting more aggressive and making disruptive repeat edits without proper Talk page participation. Multiple notices on their Talk pages. Editors with sign-in accounts are fine, however, and should be allowed access to the article. Requesting two weeks semi-protection which should cover the GAR renomination preparations period for the constructive editors participating. MusicAngels (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MusicAngels has asked for protection of his own bad writing. There is robust talk page discussion about how bad MusicAngel's writing is. In the meantime I have deleted some of the more unclear paragraphs. When they are rewritten for clarity they can go back up. This is not a disruptive process. You don't "protect" a page that is really badly written that many editors have acknowledged is really badly written. 67.135.188.9 (talk) 15:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Whoever looks at this please go to the Birdman Talk page and look at the labor that MusicAngels is requiring of other editors to fix his writing. He cannot keep putting poor prose up unhindered. He cannot keep calling any editor who edits his work "disruptive." I think there is consensus that his work is poor.67.135.188.9 (talk)
IP-editor has been asked to idetify their sign-in account name and has been procrastinating for most of this morning. They claim to have a sign-in account and are refusing to indicate what it is. They claim, in this case, to have a regular sign-in account on their Talk page but are refusing to self-identify. At this point, there may be need for reporting this as a sock which can be evaluated during this protection request. Requesting two week page protection for the article since there are responsible editors applying good faith editing for the GAR renomination preparation now in process. MusicAngels (talk) 15:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected – 2 months. IP edit warring. Two registered editors have been negotiating properly on the talk page. The IP has commented there but never waits for consensus to be reached. Use the talk page to get support for any further changes that you think are desirable. EdJohnston (talk) 15:46, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent unexplained removal of sourced information by a new SPI account created specifically for editing this page. My very best wishes (talk) 03:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 04:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

indef protection - serial recreation of an article which the AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6th Filmsaaz concluded with a merge result.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:17, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: from indefinite semi-protection to indefinite pending changes. This page was indef semi-protected in March 2012, and I think pending changes should be sufficient for this article, after more than 3 years. Protecting admin has been inactive for a few months. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 09:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 03:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same reason as the user page. IP hopping to edit. VQuakr (talk) 05:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:38, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. '''tAD''' (talk) 08:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated hoax, there is no such language. McGeddon (talk) 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One Ip user is making disruptive editing . Action Hero 10:18, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Constant disruptive editing. LLArrow (talk) 06:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: Other Users reversing changes made on my User Page that I did.Punk4orchrist (talk) 23:34, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page deleted. Left explanation for editor. NeilN talk to me 02:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant changing info that goes against sources. TropicAces (talk) 00:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 03:45, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 04:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected. Courcelles (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Falcon8765 (TALK) 02:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism release date. Iknow23 (talk) 03:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 23:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected. Courcelles (talk) 02:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Prcc27 (talk) 18:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. KrakatoaKatie 20:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ABCDEFAD 21:42, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Courcelles (talk) 02:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B41B:4FC1:242D:5468 (talk) 22:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B41B:4FC1:242D:5468 (talk) 01:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as the subarticles, editors want to import FYROM and so on and just vandalism on other edits. 2 weeks would be good, tournament will be over by then. Kante4 (talk) 10:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I do see occasional edits by IPs which are problematic and getting reverted, but it looks as if the vast majority of IP and non-autoconfirmed edits are constructive. MelanieN (talk) 18:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful IP edits. JMHamo (talk) 15:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 18:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: A finished RfA is better to be protected. Mahdy Saffar (talk) 17:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. It's not our practice to protect old RFAs unless there's disruption. KrakatoaKatie 20:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He's a prez candidate, so there's constant vandalism. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 00:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is under pending-changes protection currently, but vandalism is too frequent for PC protection to be effective. MelanieN (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism by IPs from the Philippines. ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 13:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disputed figures reverted again and again. Wykx (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mojo Hand. NeilN talk to me 18:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 16:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection -- recurrent IP vandalism re year of birth. Quis separabit? 12:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Not sure what the request was supposed to be, but the last edit in the article was made on 30 August.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful edits due to first goal scored. JMHamo (talk) 15:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 11:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 14:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant High level of IP vandalism. All recent edits seem to be vandalism or reversion, article is a mess will attempt to fixPaul  Bradbury 13:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone is repeatedly trying to add, without a source, that Polunin is Russian. This has been going on for quite a while. Hergilei (talk) 13:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 6 months NeilN talk to me 14:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of "home wrecker" and similar. . Sjö (talk) 14:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 10:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 10:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:49, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of poorly sourced POV material against consensus by anon IPs. . Andyjsmith (talk) 10:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Andyjsmith, content dispute involving both IPs and veteran editors including yourself. And there's no consensus either way. NeilN talk to me 13:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection -- recurrent IP vandalism (see [49]). Quis separabit? 12:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism and section blanking. Mr.Bob.298 (talk) 23:24, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 02:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberpower678, the bot won't archive these types of responses? --NeilN talk to me 15:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
NeilN, maybe put in a "note" template? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 01:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 13:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Frankie talk 17:45, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Salamuddin S. Shaikh (talk) 10:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Salamuddin S. Shaikh, your request makes no sense as the article has been semi protected for quite some time. NeilN talk to me 13:46, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism due to a hat-trick scored. JMHamo (talk) 13:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism from probable sockpuppets. . GABHello! 00:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 04:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Vandalism and sometimes unnecessary changes. — 73.47.37.131 (talk) 00:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Becoming disruptive, IP. NeilN talk to me 03:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. ViperSnake151  Talk  01:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined ViperSnake151, I think the main dispute has been resolved? NeilN talk to me 03:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Episode list dispute. Gatordragon (talk) 22:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/disruption by sockpuppets of User:Kingshowman. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one vandalizing the page. Removing constructive edits out of personal animus is vandalism. FearlessTruthTeller (talk) 01:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FreeKnowledgeCreator: How exactly do you know that FearlessTruthTeller is a sockpuppet of Kingshowman? Kingshowman didn't appear to follow the same style of editing as FearlessTruthTeller. --Chevvin (talk) 01:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am very familiar with Kingshowman and his edits. You are making a serious mistake by restoring the edits of a persistently disruptive user who is evading a block. Respectfully, if you had bothered to look more carefully through the revision history of Sigmund Freud, you would have noticed that the edit by FearLessTruthTeller is essentially the same as this edit by TheParrhesiastRises. Aside from that, everything about this user down to the user name shows that it's Kingshowman. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I agree that FearlessTruthTeller is a sockpuppet. However, why were the edits worth reverting? They aren't vandalism or disruption, and they're simply explaining the Oedipus Complex in more detail. --Chevvin (talk) 01:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kingshowman has become a persistent, disruptive nuisance. He seems to be on some quest to show how important and "intellectually serious" he is by expanding the leads of articles about philosophers and other famous figures beyond all reason, making them so bloated that virtually no one would want to actually read them. It's wrong in principle to encourage this person by restoring any of his edits. If you really want to discuss the lead of the Freud article, the talk page of Sigmund Freud would be the right place to do it. 01:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

I am not "disruptive" or a vandal- the only reason I even got blocked is because I said you'd never read Heidegger and later you admitted I was right and you hadn't read Being and Time. What is the point of your grudge?FearlessTruthTeller (talk) 01:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, a de facto admission of sockpuppetry. Now can this disruptive nuisance be blocked and his edits reverted? (He was blocked for persistent personal attacks, socking, and the usual roster of things editors get blocked for, not the nonsense he mentions above). The user's continued editing of Sigmund Freud is disruptive in and of itself, since it's block evasion. The article needs protecting regardless of the quality of Kingshowman's edits, which, in my opinion, is poor. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 03:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple accounts. When I tried to clean this up I was persistently reverted and given warnings for the trouble. Let's just lock this for awhile, and avoid such wastes of time. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 02:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Situation seems to be in hand with blocks and trout-slaps. NeilN talk to me 03:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Philip J FryTalk 17:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is a frequent target of IPs and SPAs battling over whether the subject "belongs" to the Indian states of Bengal or Odisha (a real world dispute amongst partisans that has been imported to wikipedia). Long term semi-protection will help manage, though not eliminate, disruption due to this issue. Abecedare (talk) 18:55, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been persistent vandalism recently, all from fans. It's getting seriously annoying. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 19:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi: Low-level but chronic population inflation. An online source promoting the French language has an inflated estimate of the number of native speakers (by about 50%, from ~75M to 110M), contradicting published figures from the French govt. that agree with multiple linguistic sources and have been discussed on the talk page. It seems every other time I come back to this article, the online figures have been substituted again. (There's even a warning on the web site: AVIS : Les opinions exprimées dans ce site sont celles de l'auteur et n'engagent en rien ni la CEFAN ni l'Université Laval 'WARNING: The opinions expressed on this site are those of the author and do not represent CEFAN or Laval University'.) Population inflation is a perennial problem in language articles, but this one is worse than most. — kwami (talk) 20:56, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 1 month, PC 1 year NeilN talk to me 04:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indef semi-protection: Persistent long-term vandalism by multiple sockpuppets of indef banned Escoperloit. Richard Harvey (talk) 16:50, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently there's been a lot of IP vandalism. Chevvin (talk) 01:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BoboMeowCat (talk) 03:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We have an apparent IP attack on the Serena Williams article. I am One of Many (talk) 03:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP edits changing the operating status or otherwise speculating on the future of this roller coaster without citing reliable sources. Incidentally this is the same reason the page was recently under pending changes protection but it has expired. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This article has needed virtually continuous semi-protection since June. MelanieN (talk) 21:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user vandalizing their talk page. Wildthing61476 (talk) 21:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Someone had already done it. Courcelles (talk) 21:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13 September 2015

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 3 days, PC 1 month. NeilN talk to me 17:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection talk page under heavy recent IP vandalism. LibStar (talk) 14:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created by the same user three times. Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 15:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 17:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Everymorning (talk) 16:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 17:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Sock puppets keep restoring this after "Combination Lock (game show)" was deleted and then salted due to lack of reliable sourcing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 17:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am requesting temporary semi-protection. If the page was semi-protected more than two times previously, then permanent semi-protection is best. As his novels are read by teens and kids, they will come here to vandalize. Action Hero Shoot! 17:16, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent page blanking. Babitaarora (talk/contribs) 08:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator The Earwig. Favonian (talk) 09:37, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Practically all edits these days are references to the 4chan meme. McGeddon (talk) 11:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:23, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all recent edits are vandalism/reverts of vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 15:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip editors keep changing date ranges despite airdates in list not corroborating those changes. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry by socks of Caidin-Productions; recently an IP editor added the non-existent bad faith "Caidin Red" color. --201.53.53.216 (talk) 23:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: requesting pending changes protection, current event of Bangladesh involving the subject. ~ Nahid Talk 06:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – an anon who appears to be IP hopping is adding unsourced promotional material about the band. If it returns, my next edit will be to tag the content but it would be better if the editor, who has admitted a COI, is prevented from edit warring over the content. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism due to scoring on debut. JMHamo (talk) 18:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:47, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A bunch of unconfirmed users seem to be edit-warring over the subject's religion. . Kautilya3 (talk) 19:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created three times and deleted those three times. Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not recreated after last create protection expired. NeilN talk to me 01:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IP editors stretching over months. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This article was semi-protected to prevent edit warring from an IP editor who was changing sourced content from "mixed reviews" to "positive reviews". A confirmed account has now taken up the same torch in edit warring to either remove the source or change it to "positive reviews". I have requested the editor discuss his changes on the talk page here, and he has refused. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I don't know what to say. The bot does the general fix, user reverts. I revert back to bot, get reverted under the same user who continues to edit under an IP. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 03:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Unprotection: The protection is a endorsement of the current version so it must be unprotected. A8v (talk) 23:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined A8v, suggest you re-read the protection message. And the message above highlighted in yellow. NeilN talk to me 01:23, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. 201.53.53.216 (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sock accounts blocked. MelanieN (talk) 18:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 1 week protection from due to high level of vandalism. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 19:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. I was just about to report it until I saw your post. Vandalism is substantial. Savvyjack23 (talk) 02:03, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Even though this particular article title has not been created before, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poison In The Grapes and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Middleamericajames indicate a history of disruptive editing and sock puppetry and I'd agree with the comment at the closed Afd that this be salted, just as Matthew Berdyck has been. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 01:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Edit warring/Vandalism - Ice-T is referred to as Water-T as a joke in a recent episode of the television show Rick and Morty. Water-T is a joke and not a name Ice-T is referred to by and should not be included in an Encyclopedic setting. It appears that the page was already under temporary protection at one point. This resolved the issue until it expired. This move is to make the protection permanent. UnbeatenFiddle (talk) 21:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. WadeSimMiser (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 207.62.246.202 (talk · contribs) blocked by KTC. -- KTC (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Favonian. -- KTC (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Longer semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in the TCM Remembers section by IP 76.99.80.177. User has been asked by User:Hotsushi-kun and myself to stop adding the info but he continues to do so without responding to our messages. Page was previously protected for two weeks; should be protected longer. This seems to be the only page he's vandalizing, but if he continues after the protection is lifted, I will request that the user be blocked. --ThylekShran (talk) 22:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 22:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment: It looks like I also see some sockpuppetry patterns, especially with the "waka waka waka" words. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – slow but steady vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This individual's Wikipedia article has been repeatedly edited by an IP user to include misleading and slanderous information. Ms. Young is a sitting university president, and this is a BLP issue— she has contacted OTRS asking for assistance (see VRTS ticket # 2015091110022091 for an explanation of her concerns and a detailed review of the edits in question). KDS4444Talk 23:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Posted to WP:BLPN. NeilN talk to me 01:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Almost nonstop BLP violations and vandalism since 2-3 weeks ago. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 01:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A twofer--students with too much free time on a Saturday night. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 01:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:44, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – In an episode of American Dad!, Steve Smith creates a Wikipedia article by this name. Should fully protect. Krett12 (talk) 20:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Krett12: This page has been fully protected since 2012 [50], and this request is in reduction in level of protection. Can you clarify what you mean? -- Orduin Discuss 23:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It can't be fully protected because I am able to edit it and I am not an admin Krett12 (talk) 00:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. Krett12, you are not able to create the article. NeilN talk to me 01:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. 201.53.53.216 (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sock accounts blocked. MelanieN (talk) 18:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. WadeSimMiser (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 207.62.246.202 (talk · contribs) blocked by KTC. -- KTC (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Favonian. -- KTC (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 22:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment: It looks like I also see some sockpuppetry patterns, especially with the "waka waka waka" words. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – slow but steady vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This individual's Wikipedia article has been repeatedly edited by an IP user to include misleading and slanderous information. Ms. Young is a sitting university president, and this is a BLP issue— she has contacted OTRS asking for assistance (see VRTS ticket # 2015091110022091 for an explanation of her concerns and a detailed review of the edits in question). KDS4444Talk 23:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Posted to WP:BLPN. NeilN talk to me 01:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Even though this particular article title has not been created before, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poison In The Grapes and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Middleamericajames indicate a history of disruptive editing and sock puppetry and I'd agree with the comment at the closed Afd that this be salted, just as Matthew Berdyck has been. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 01:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Edit warring/Vandalism - Ice-T is referred to as Water-T as a joke in a recent episode of the television show Rick and Morty. Water-T is a joke and not a name Ice-T is referred to by and should not be included in an Encyclopedic setting. It appears that the page was already under temporary protection at one point. This resolved the issue until it expired. This move is to make the protection permanent. UnbeatenFiddle (talk) 21:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Longer semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in the TCM Remembers section by IP 76.99.80.177. User has been asked by User:Hotsushi-kun and myself to stop adding the info but he continues to do so without responding to our messages. Page was previously protected for two weeks; should be protected longer. This seems to be the only page he's vandalizing, but if he continues after the protection is lifted, I will request that the user be blocked. --ThylekShran (talk) 22:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Almost nonstop BLP violations and vandalism since 2-3 weeks ago. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 01:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A twofer--students with too much free time on a Saturday night. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 01:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:44, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. 201.53.53.216 (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sock accounts blocked. MelanieN (talk) 18:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 22:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment: It looks like I also see some sockpuppetry patterns, especially with the "waka waka waka" words. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – slow but steady vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This individual's Wikipedia article has been repeatedly edited by an IP user to include misleading and slanderous information. Ms. Young is a sitting university president, and this is a BLP issue— she has contacted OTRS asking for assistance (see VRTS ticket # 2015091110022091 for an explanation of her concerns and a detailed review of the edits in question). KDS4444Talk 23:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Posted to WP:BLPN. NeilN talk to me 01:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – In an episode of American Dad!, Steve Smith creates a Wikipedia article by this name. Should fully protect. Krett12 (talk) 20:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Krett12: This page has been fully protected since 2012 [51], and this request is in reduction in level of protection. Can you clarify what you mean? -- Orduin Discuss 23:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It can't be fully protected because I am able to edit it and I am not an admin Krett12 (talk) 00:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. Krett12, you are not able to create the article. NeilN talk to me 01:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – quite a bit of non notable additions combatted by multiple editors . Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 18:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes. Fresh Sullivan (talk) 17:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Fresh Sullivan, any reason why you reverted all the useful edits? NeilN talk to me 17:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce to template-editor protection: Does not need full protection, and does need maintenance, which I can't do until this is fixed. Its protection level pre-dates the advent of the template-editor bit. {{Cquote}} ({{Pull quote}}) has TE protection, and is a much more used template (5× more), without incident.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  17:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done SMcCandlish, have at it. NeilN talk to me 17:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sankyu beddy mush.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  18:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

14 September 2015

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 15:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 16:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After Special:Contributions/Behnamvvv was blocked due to adding unsourced materials, someone started to use IP to do vandalism. Please read the contributions of 86.55.152.8, 89.199.208.18, 5.209.51.181, 178.131.143.244, 109.108.180.141 and 85.239.195.75, many users have cleared these unsourced materials many times. Thank you. Thomas.Lu (talk) 16:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent disruption since May by IPs seeking to remove or discredit reliable sources. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 year. EdJohnston (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection Persistent IP insertion of WP:CRYSTAL material. Barts1a / Talk to me / Help me improve 10:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lear's Fool. NeilN talk to me 14:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Persistent insertion of WP:CRYSTAL material. Full protection required to prevent edit-warring by both registered and IP users. As noted on the discussion page, the holder of the office remains Tony Abbott, not Malcolm Turnbull. No change will be effected until the Governor-General of Australia commissions the latter. Cyril Washbrook (talk) 12:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lear's Fool semied it for a few hours NeilN talk to me 13:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: - IP persistently changing sourced match timing to originally researched information recently. starship.paint ~ KO 14:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Starship.paint, that IP has a lot of edits.... NeilN talk to me 14:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Action Hero Shoot! 10:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User warned, if they do it again please report to AIV. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Created as some kind of copypaste move by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LAST_TIME_OF_EARTH, replaced with a typo/variant-spelling redirect by another editor. Should either be deleted and salted or locked as a redirect. McGeddon (talk) 10:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Page deleted, and semi'd. @McGeddon: Where should it redirect to? Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:CoffeeWithMarkets redirected it to Khowar language as a plausible typo of "Arniya". --McGeddon (talk) 10:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Mdrnpndr (talk) 13:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 13:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 9 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: - Continued edit dispute after article protection removed. Disrupting the article. Again. --BabbaQ (talk) 07:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeated creation of this and related articles (including Arina language) by sockpuppets of blocked user. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:14, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Redirected. NeilN talk to me 13:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Not a WP:HRT. No response by protecting admin when asked. Alakzi (talk) 22:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. 300 is enough for semi-protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article's subject is currently in the spotlight big-time, disruption from IPs and new editors has already begun and is likely to continue. IgnorantArmies (talk) 06:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 06:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ZephyrP (talk) 08:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of (anti-semitic, holocaust-denial) IP vandalism.  Volunteer Marek  23:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create-protection: Repeatedly recreated article on a non-notable person. --201.53.53.216 (talk) 01:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined at the moment. It's only one user so I've warned them, if they do it again I'll block them. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry by an IP giving WP:Not censored more weight than WP:Offensive material in a matter where that shouldn't be the case. The IP is the same IP range as a Cali11298 WP:Sock; see User talk:Flyer22/Archive 19#User:Cali11298 trying to brag about WP:Sockpuppeting for more detail. Given the persistent nature of this WP:Sock, I suggest that the Fingering (sexual act) article be semi-protected for two months. But one month is also fine. Semi-protecting it for days or a couple of weeks is too soon of an expiration date, per the persistent nature of this WP:Sock. Flyer22 (talk) 03:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And, yes, Cali11298 has used this IP range to sock elsewhere, including at the Assyria article; that the IP was a WP:Sock in that case was also reported. Flyer22 (talk) 04:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 06:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Pending changes doesn't seem to be helping prevent "Combination Lock"-inserting sock puppets from entering unsourced information. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please disucss it with the protecting admin (User:NeilN) first. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editing tests by various IP users and new users since a long time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: User request in userspace . Vacationlandman (talk) 01:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP continues to add unsourced content to article every few days, and will not take his concerns to the talk page or provide sources. Temporary semi protection (30 days?) may encourage him to use the talk page or move on.   — Jess· Δ 15:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; second request in two days. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 00:16, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll add my voice to this request to place Temporary semi-protection on this article. Vandalism has continued and the count is 37 edits within past five days, most of which have been vandalism and the reversal of same. This edit-war has spilled over to the point that ClueBot has twice restored what, to a human, would be obvious vandalism (and this has been brought up at Cluebot's talk page). It's time for the disruption to end, please protect the page. Etamni | ✉   00:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/D-Dog-16 as well. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:42, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Datbubblegumdoetalkcontribs 00:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term abuse from an IP who is avoiding block from nearly four years. MYS77 00:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: POV editors attempting to insert obvious BLP violating material (linking a living person to a murder via innuendo, with no proof provided), despite numerous explanations from at least three editors on the talk page -- one an admin -- of why the material is not appropriate. BMK (talk) 20:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Look, I don't really care about any of the NFL teams but since the season is upon us, maybe WP can keep the vandalism to a dull roar... Shearonink (talk) 21:23, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism for some reason. JMHamo (talk) 21:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long B-Class article about an important philosopher. I feel it deserves protection. Geodon93 (talk) 22:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please check the protection policy as well. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism (part of a mass attack?). Pokechu22 (talk) 00:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of IP abuse and personal attacks, BLP violation. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 17:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article keeps being vandalized by IP editors and new accounts. Gparyani (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: One IP (now with with self-declared inability to let go due to autism :/ ) keeps substituting unsourced opinions for sourced material. Multiply warned & discussed, but no sign of letup. A week or fortnight of semi-protection might sort this out. Elmidae (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 18:41, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't see that, sorry. Is it edit-warring if one party is factually vandalizing? It's not as if there's any doubt about which version should be there. -- Elmidae (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Elmidae, obvious vandalism should be reported to WP:AIV. I've made it clear to the IP that I will block them if the continue so if they do, please drop me a note on my talk page. --NeilN talk to me 19:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 20:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Packers fans are getting awfully cocky about an eight-point win right now. Zappa24Mati 20:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Action Hero Shoot! 17:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 23:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Major religious figure, Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of original research and unverifiable claims from unreliable sources - semi protection is usual in similar cases. --febycv (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 18:32, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Major religious figure, Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of original research and unverifiable claims from unreliable sources - semi protection is usual in similar cases. --febycv (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. febycv, semi-protection is decided on a case-by-case basis. NeilN talk to me 18:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Highly visible, as linked from the G8 section of WP:CSD. Gparyani (talk) 23:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 23:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of original research and unverifiable claims from a reliable source. livelikemusic my talk page! 12:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: major political figure, partisan vandalism is usual in such articles - semi protection is usual in similar cases. Govindaharihari (talk) 14:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC). Govindaharihari (talk) 14:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. KTC (talk) 20:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by various users-- ip and registered. Zortwort (talk) 17:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 17:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Silent IP edit warring over whether it's a chocolate bar or biscuit. McGeddon (talk) 17:59, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Request protection within own space. Jetstreamer Talk 20:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected MusikAnimal talk 20:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wildthing61476 (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Gogo Dodo. NeilN talk to me 20:41, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 19:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Very high level of IP vandalism. Jeppiz (talk) 19:58, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No reason anyone should edit this redirect, and it has gotten vandalized numerous times since it was created. Everymorning (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 20:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Three times already. Action Hero Shoot! 11:44, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It was actually only deleted once, then restored and moved to the userspace MusikAnimal talk 15:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One (or at most two) IP editor tries to force his view on the article, but did not engage in the Talk page discussion on the subject (since the two IPs use very similar edit tags, it is likely that only one editor is behind the edits). Because this has been going on for more than a month now (e.g., see my first Talk page comment about this), a protection may be due, in order to avoid edit warring. KœrteFa {ταλκ} 16:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:54, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – 09815132422 Call Girls % Escort Service Panchkula mohali zirakpur chandigarh and 09815132422 Pinjore Call Girls In Zirakpur Call me

Salt these pages for obvious reason. All are call girl advertisement pages created by the same user User:Heenarani111. And if there is a tool, then any page with these phone numbers must be prevented from creation. These pages were created once but you understand the gravity of the situation. Action Hero Shoot! 16:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suggested that the phone number be blacklisted from article titles five days ago, to no response. None of these individual titles are being recreated, though, are they? --McGeddon (talk) 16:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator BD2412. though I don't see a reason to salt now that the user is blocked MusikAnimal talk 16:55, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
They've were already socking a lot last week to create the articles. But if no title is being reused more than once, there's no reason to salt anything. --McGeddon (talk) 16:59, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Salted anyway. It certainly can't hurt. I agree with blacklisting the phone number, without which the whole effort is pointless. bd2412 T 17:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, phone number is blacklisted with suggested regex at MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist#Escort service phone number. I've tested it and it seems to work. Let us know if new variations come up MusikAnimal talk 17:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 15:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:14, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP addition of unlikely series revival, citing a nonexistent source. Ignores talk page requests. . SummerPhDv2.0 15:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism and disruptive editing by an anonymous user. . Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:03, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 13:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See history of article. Persistent vandal has returned. Deli nk (talk) 14:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please make the current semi-protection indefinite. Thanks. I dream of horses (T) @ 06:42, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 14:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – one day, TFA being vandalised by IP. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 03:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And straight back they came after 3 hrs. Can I get 12 hrs please? Thanks, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 10:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this has now been extended to the end of today (Wikitime). Thank you. In my experience, TFAs should be semi'd for the day they are up, as a matter of course. There are always idiots who will delete swathes of text, change pics, etc etc. Thanks again, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 10:54, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People keep adding unsourced nonsense in the article, which has been leading the article to be reverted several times in the last days, weeks and months, as can be noticed if ones views the article's history. PMLF (talk) 04:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Keeps being edited by sockpuppets of blocked user Ezidishingali. Gparyani (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please stop this. He will come back. Two times created today. Don't wait for another attempt in recreating the page. Action Hero Shoot! 06:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit-warring without discussing on talk page. Scolaire (talk) 07:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 10 reverted edits over the last 7 hours. Inomyabcs (talk) 08:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Again. Just came off months-long semi two days ago, and every edit since has been either vandalism or its removal. This is a repeating pattern, wherein there's been longer and longer periods of semi-protection, only for the vandalism to be overwhelming the second it drops off. The article is a vandalism magnet, and needs to be permanently semi-protected. oknazevad (talk) 09:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: people keep saying mean things on my talk page. Krett12 (talk) 01:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Krett12, I suggest you take careful note of what we're saying. NeilN talk to me 01:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am. And I also want you to do the same. Krett12 (talk) 01:55, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: user request, possible edit request once protected?. ///Racer-Ωmegα 02:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there seems to be an issue with the List of WWE Divas Champions. There are constant disruptive editing where users are adding John Cena aswell as other inappropriate stuff as the Divas Champion. This is an ongoing issue with several IP Users.Is there anyway you could protect the page so only registered users can edit it to stop all the vandalism? regards 80.192.130.85 (talk) 03:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:41, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two redirects: Runningback U & Running Back U

Is there someone here who likes American Football and knows how to fix this problem? It seems that this is a fictional title (there seems to be no correct place to redirect to). People who believe that their local team is the best keep changing the redirects. Deleting the redirects and protecting them against recreation seems to be the way to go. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 20:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberpower678: Cyberbot, I love you, but you gotta change the formatting-rules because they seem to be incompatible with redirects. I pinged your owner. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 20:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The Quixotic Potato, I posted at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_College_football#Redirects NeilN talk to me 20:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: JohnInDC seems to agree. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 00:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Quixotic Potato, give it a day or two to see if anyone objects. --NeilN talk to me 00:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, sounds reasonable. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 00:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edits the mostly sock masters recently. Scots97 (talk) 00:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 00:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs after end of previous page protection. RA0808 talkcontribs 02:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. NeilN talk to me 04:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 02:44, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Shirik. NeilN talk to me 04:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Reverts by IP user who does not communicate on the Talk page. Borsoka (talk) 02:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. NeilN talk to me 04:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking resumed within six hours of the previous month-long protection ending. McGeddon (talk) 15:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sarah (talk) 21:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two redirects: Runningback U & Running Back U

Is there someone here who likes American Football and knows how to fix this problem? It seems that this is a fictional title (there seems to be no correct place to redirect to). People who believe that their local team is the best keep changing the redirects. Deleting the redirects and protecting them against recreation seems to be the way to go. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 20:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberpower678: Cyberbot, I love you, but you gotta change the formatting-rules because they seem to be incompatible with redirects. I pinged your owner. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 20:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The Quixotic Potato, I posted at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_College_football#Redirects NeilN talk to me 20:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: JohnInDC seems to agree. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 00:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Quixotic Potato, give it a day or two to see if anyone objects. --NeilN talk to me 00:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, sounds reasonable. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 00:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Edit disputes have been resolved. A8v (talk) 10:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I don't know why Drmies didn't follow-up as he was the one who protected it (or maybe I missed a response somewhere) but given that the protection ends in about 20 minutes, I will just leave it be and let it expire. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal, serious WP:BLP concerns. Shearonink (talk) 22:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced revival. Ignotrs talk requests Possibly a return of The UPN Vandal. SummerPhDv2.0 00:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is being vandalised by numerous IPs over a two week period . JAGUAR  00:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the subject of the article it will be prone to vandalism. Additionally, extremely obvious vandalism remained on the article for over a week before being noticed. . Pishcal 15:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I don't understand how this is vandalism. It might be badly formatted but looks a good faith on-topic edit. The other edits look like a content dispute; Talk:The Muppets (TV series) is thataway. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection; two months We just came off a full pp due to edit warring. Article is one of several at Arbcom. Same disruptive pattern as before. Please protect, probably for duration of Arbcom case. Thanks Jytdog (talk) 21:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16 September 2015

Indefinite semi-protection: To match the protection of its merge target, {{infobox rail line}}, per WP:TFDAI. BethNaught (talk) 06:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The talk page was semi protected for six months for persistent disruptions by IP hopping vandal; the protection expired yesterday and today the vandalism started again. It is identical to the vandalism six months ago. bonadea contributions talk 07:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It seems there is a minor disagreement between few IP users on the discography. A discussion was initiated at the talk page, but the reverts haven't ceased yet.--Retrohead (talk) 09:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection, since it's had to be protected twice already this year for the same issue; For months, this article has been under assault by anon-ips who, despite repeated calls for evidence, provide not and utter not a word of discussion about a specious claim that the billionaire article subject has four children, not two. The additional purported children cannot be documented, as it's beginning to appear as if parties with an agenda are trying to use Wikipedia as a basis of claiming paternity for two ostensible out-of-wedlock children who may or may not be his. Levering Wikipedia to press paternity claims is reprehensible, but the monetary stakes seem high enough for this iP-hopping editor to risk it. Wouldn't be the first timewe've seen people tty to manipulate Wikipedia to push a dubious claim.---Tenebrae (talk) 14:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This sockpuppet Mollywoodmonster of Azhar sulfikar and maybe a third one is creating this page repeatedly. See User talk:Azhar sulfikar and User talk:Mollywoodmonster .both are here to create nonsense pages. Administrators can find out who created this page on 21 August. Today this page was created as a page for Malayalam actor and then became of a Software professional (entire biography changed by Mollywood monster) . He used the IP to remove my deletion tag. . Action Hero Shoot! 16:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs blanking content without explanation or discussion. McGeddon (talk) 20:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Shifting IPs repeatedly blanking the name of a challenge winner on both this and Tube Challenge. McGeddon (talk) 20:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Anonymous user from Canada is making unsubstantiated edits to this page. We will revisit protection once the current federal election is over in Canada. Envirodefence (talk) 13:55, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 15:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A little respite for the page to put off more pop-up editors . Murry1975 (talk) 18:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Floquenbeam. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:49, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two pages plagued by persistent sock puppetry - BLP issue

Temporary full protection: Persistent sock puppetry by prolific sock puppeteer inserting material that is a WP:BLP violation. WCMemail 18:31, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected. Courcelles (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of unsourced POV by an anon. Sitush (talk) 08:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for one week by Bishonen. tutterMouse (talk) 16:51, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent reversion of editors made by a series of unregistered users with no justification. Latest IP is geo-located to the company itself, suggesting a conflict of interest. contaldo80 | Contaldo80 (talk) 08:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism today from several IP addresses. EricEnfermero (Talk) 17:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 15:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by anon users. ~ ScitDeiWanna talk? 05:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 15:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Subject just revealed in NYT he lied about surviving the WTC attacks on 9/11. Already a flurry of edits on a relatively quiet page, expect more. Many are of an unhelpful nature. Exacerbated by the fact the subject is a comedian, IPs/anons are more likely to try to be funny perhaps?. JesseRafe (talk) 14:51, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent fancrufting, continuing after expiration of recent protection. Perhaps a plethora of socks, but at any rate an obsessive fondness for peacock language and 'blockbusters'. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 01:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anon who travels primarily in the area of Southern Quebec and parts of Southern Ontario has decided that old references should be removed. Please lock the article either indefinitely or at least until April 2016. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Indef. The protection log shows concerns about vandalism dating back to 2012. EdJohnston (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism make by unregistered user. NovaPark | Talk:(NovaPark) 08:52, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant US chart position (Billboard 100) vandalism. Iknow23 (talk) 23:58, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism magnet.Crboyer (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment: Looks dead serious. NeilN had protected at July 2015 for a few days and yet still vandalism later on. Must have longer protection. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:12, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced and disruptive edits. Qed237 (talk) 11:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: IP-hopping vandals making the same hyperbolic, fannish, POV edits that their IP socks have been warned about multiple times by multiple editors. Two editors have had to spend time with these anon IPs over the last two days. Requesting indefinite such one such sock, 50.5.214.147, has been indefinitely blocked yet he keeps coming back under different IPs. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by new accounts has continued after expiration of the previous requested protection. —BarrelProof (talk) 01:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abnormally large amount of new editors for such an obscure article. NeilN talk to me 01:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Everymorning (talk) 03:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive IP continues nonsense about GSN closing and becoming SHN . Digifan23 (talk) 22:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and disruptive editing, which is no surprise given how controversial a topic this is. Everymorning (talk) 23:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some good IP edits there NeilN talk to me 00:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  23:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extended current PC protection by 1 more year. NeilN talk to me 00:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – created two times by same people and they might create again. Action Hero Shoot! 12:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Three times is my policy MusikAnimal talk 15:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Waiting for second opinion about this auto-biography created repeatedly.--Action Hero Shoot! 16:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I also use three times as a yardstick. NeilN talk to me 20:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 17:48, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have decided to "improve" the article [53] and they're still at it, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 21:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thank you :) –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 11:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Once again, this page was also created three times. Action Hero Shoot! 14:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Twice in 2010 and once now isn't really enough. Get three in a short period and OK. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People are using the page as though if it was Wikipedia:Sandbox. Please protect this page as if it was Sandbox, Test, or Swag, etc. Thanks!. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 14:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive activity resumed after protection expired - (diff). ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 16:59, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some short-term vandalism since early September. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 17:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Edgar181. NeilN talk to me 18:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The BLP vandalism started up shortly after the previous protection expired. This is a highly-visible BLP subject involved in a very controversial matter. . - MrX 17:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is a perennial magnet for vandals. Can you protect it indefinitely please?. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of defamatory content. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – OTRS request - page is being consistently vandalised again and incorrect information added. samtar (msg) 16:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 17:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Currently, an IP hopping editor placing in "Disney a Owned Governments" section and proclaiming Hong Kong is owned by Disney. But other disruptive edits too since beginning of the month. Spshu (talk) 17:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To prevent spoilers, whether true or false. Protection effective until the show's finale has aired in all U.S. time zones. Greggens (talk) 18:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive and unsourced edits. Qed237 (talk) 19:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Vandalism, although there were some good edits too. 115.188.198.32 (talk) 03:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:Disruptive editing and WP:Edit warring by 143.176.216.29 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Same person who used the 143.176.62.228 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) IP and was repeatedly blocked for WP:Disruptive editing and WP:Edit warring with regard to age disparity. Flyer22 (talk) 08:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I request full protection, because the 'editwar' is started by the person that made this request. So far there have been 2 reverts, so there is doubt that there is even an editwar at all. There is no WP:Disruptive editing by the IP, but the threats and false accustistions made by flyer (about sockpuppets) are disruptive.143.176.216.29 (talk) 08:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Callanecc. The edit history clearly shows that he was reverted by three different editors. I still feel that the article should be WP:Semi-protected for at least two months, though. This person does not give up, as his editing at the Age disparity in sexual relationships article and its talk page show. Also see past commentary at the User talk:143.176.62.228. Flyer22 (talk) 08:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Given it's just one person I'd rather focus on blocking the IP rather than protecting a page and preventing everyone else from editing it. The IP (given how long it took for it to change last time) is fairly stale so can be managed that way. I'd suggest disengaging from their talk page though. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created three times. Action Hero Shoot! 14:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 14:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created three times. Action Hero Shoot! 14:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 14:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I've been reverting again and again with a couple of IP's, pointing out to WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:VGSCOPE has not worked so far. Soetermans. T / C 10:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit-warring over birth year, which is 1982 per college yearbook source. Binksternet (talk) 04:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Full-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 12:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Anna Frodesiak. NeilN talk to me 14:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 11:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. —JAaron95 Talk 11:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No need for indef full, it's only new accounts we're trying to stop editing the page. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Callanec: One more please.. 985M. Regards—JAaron95 Talk 11:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent unverifiable claims by Abs2017. IP vandalism from 183.228.31.158.Qisq2 (talk) 12:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It was previously protected from June to September 2015 for persistent IP vandalism and once the protection was lifted a few days, it's been vandalism several times by IP editors again. Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tropicalkitty (talk) 03:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Courcelles. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vios. Influx of vandals. Nymf (talk) 04:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This page is getting vandalised frequently and we are some users who are tired of reverting the daily vandalism. Temporary semi-protection can hopefully help. --Ahmetyal (talk) 10:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes he's blocked but he'll be back after 24 years. --Ahmetyal (talk) 10:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.: Semi protection won't prevent the either of the blocked editors from editing the article, but if it continues after the block expires they can be reblocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive and unsourced edits, with IP only updating their favourite player and add incorrect numbers. Qed237 (talk) 13:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of properly sourced material with FALSE edit summary of "Fixed typo" or "Fixed error". Iknow23 (talk) 22:49, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Iknow23, there are some good IP edits. I've blocked the disruptive editor. If disruption continues please re-report here or drop me a note on my talk page. NeilN talk to me 22:56, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: There is no need for the protection. Look at the history and the talk page. Vandals don't want to discuss, they just revert my edits and then ask for protection! They don't want any change. For over a month, I have been waiting for the consensus! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mujaddid&oldid=680129958 BiKaz (talk) 20:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined BiKaz, on the contrary your talk page posts show full protection is still necessary. NeilN talk to me 23:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of misplaced/test edits by new users. Everymorning (talk) 17:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Heavily watched and keeping it unprotected so anyone can edit outweighs the need for a revert every couple days. NeilN talk to me 22:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To prevent spoilers, whether true or false. Greggens (talk) 17:56, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 22:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To prevent spoilers, whether true or false. Greggens (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 22:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To prevent spoilers, whether true or false. Greggens (talk) 17:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 22:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring - All reference to Gaia theory has been repeatedly removed from the Earth system science article, starting with Toby Tyrrell, perhaps the most prominent published critic of Gaia theory today and the author of a book that purported to disprove it, who himself removed some editor's inclusion of such material, in November, 2014. This was done without any discussion on the Talk page, and with a simple summary statement suggesting that such material was "irrelevant" to Earth system science. Since then, my own more recent reintroduction of similar material has been removed repeatedly and continuously by a few editors. Please note that I initiated lengthy discussions at the Talk page about the problem. Among the editors who have been engaged in this behavior lately, one had been blocked previously and cited for blocking evasion (Prokaryotes), and another seems to have been cited for vandalism (Isambard Kingdom) and edit warring. One of them sent me an edit warring warning, although I have tried to be careful not to remove other editors' work at all whenever possible, while all of my additions have been removed repeatedly. Thanks very much for your consideration of this matter. Terradactyl (talk) 06:09, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, full protection is not warranted in this case since this is a content dispute, and one side would just gain an advantage. Please try usual dispute resolution avenues.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection (indefinite or long term): Repeated edit warring, caused by one singular editor's repeated desire to add controversial material into the article, despite opposition from multiple other editors (myself included). This problem was not solved by a previous three day full protection introduced by User:NeilN on 9 November, thus indefinite or long term protection seems necessary. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined For now. More editors have shown up. NeilN talk to me 22:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very, very high profile article, so vandalism is very common, so long-term protection seems warranted. Everymorning (talk) 22:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 00:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Calidum 19:09, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – we seem to have a lot of IP's either reverting Denali or reverting McKinley... this right after a recent protection ran out. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: This article has been created a third time after it has been deleted twice. In the most recent creation's edit summary, the user has threatened to constantly recreate it even if it is deleted. Gparyani (talk) 23:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 23:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please lock the page for a full month till the actual season premiers. It is increasingly difficult to collaborate with one particular user, LLArrow, there. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 05:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please just block IndianBio, or both of us. The page shouldn't suffer from the constant squabbling between us. I would go through the proper channels but I am just swamped with work. The user is the defintion of disruptive (see here for a taste of their charm). LLArrow (talk) 05:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked User:LLArrow if he will voluntarily take a break from the article until October 7. At present I've no idea whether LLArrow or IndianBIO is more likely to be right about the content dispute. If the war continues, some admin action will be needed, and the article may suffer. EdJohnston (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – But both User:LLArrow and User:IndianBio are warned for edit warring. Any further reverts between now and October 7 on this article may lead to a block unless you have received consensus on the talk page in support of your change. EdJohnston (talk) 17:55, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 16:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This page was repeatedly recreated for the last couple of months. . Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 22:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all recent edits are vandalism by IPs/new accounts or reverts of such vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 21:49, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 22:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 21:56, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 21:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of unconstructive editing recently. Everymorning (talk) 22:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18 September 2015

Indefinite semi-protection. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 14:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, absolutely no reason for protection. NeilN talk to me 15:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is featured on the main page. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 19:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request in user space. Faizan (talk) 18:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Courcelles (talk) 19:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 16:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to its popularity, the film's article will be subject to rampant vandalism, that will make it unworthy of its FA status. A TFA for this article is also being planned for Oct 20 (not too far away), so it should be protected for that reason. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by IPs. Achayan (talk) 08:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 13:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editing tests by IP users affecting the article's reliability and stability big time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 houors, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 17:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Several IPs and new editors twiddling the start and end dates of the generation against sources. McGeddon (talk) 17:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent low-level sock-puppetry by one editor who is (or thinks he is) a member of this family (please see talk-page discussion). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. initial protection is rarely indefinite.kelapstick(bainuu) 17:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template upload protection High risk image currently used in template:OW, which is under template protection. This file is template protected from editing, but not uploads of new versions. However, please leave the template editing protection in place to avoid users tagging this image for transwiki to Commons. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is protected, but not correctly. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@DavidLeighEllis:, and particular reason not to move it to Commons and then I'd protect it over there? That would also keep anyone other than admins able to upload over it locally. Courcelles (talk) 21:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I uploaded the file to Commons and requested that it be fully protected there. If the Commons administration is willing to due this, I will tag the local image for speedy deletion. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, needs to be handled on Commons. tutterMouse (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent misguided IP editing. One reviewer declared a certain book was secretly by Pynchon, and multiple IPs have been adding this title to his list of works. Choor monster (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Re-created multiple times by a user for promotional purposes. --Non-Dropframe talk 15:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator NawlinWiki. NeilN talk to me 15:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 15:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of IP disruption. Qed237 (talk) 16:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: numerous disruptive edits from IP's and unconfirmed users in the wake of the debate last night.CFredkin (talk) 00:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As there is a federal election going on in Canada this page has been a magnet for vandals. Semi ed before, then expired, then vandalism returned.... Dbrodbeck (talk) 00:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 31 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., that should take it till the end of the election. Seems no constructive IP edits since unprotection. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: All new user edits here are mistaken attempts to create new articles by overwriting the content of this one. McGeddon (talk) 08:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 13:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP sockpuppet of 楊千呱 (talk · contribs) going on changing the same information for which the original master was blocked for WP:EW. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 11:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Also user vandalism being dealt with as sock-puppetry. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 11:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stephenb (Talk) 12:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 01:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Karl Dickman. NeilN talk to me 02:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extended from 3 hours NeilN talk to me 02:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steel1943 (talk) 01:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 02:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by one or more editors using new and unregistered accounts. ElKevbo (talk) 03:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 03:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuing socking immediately after expiry of last protection. Ref-spamming. GermanJoe (talk) 16:29, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-running vandalism problems. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:28, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 01:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The kids are back to school. The article always gets vandalized this time of year. McSly (talk) 01:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Vsmith. NeilN talk to me 02:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19 September 2015

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is some recent posterior-pertaining vandalism, and the past history includes some persistant IP editors with many reverts of such IPs. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 10:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 10:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extreme disruptive editing from IP's of concert tour from highly-popular pop group. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors are citing that this person is dead. But I verified that he is alive and the editors confused with Rashid bin Mohammed Al Maktoum who actually died recently. Please semi protect this page to prevent unsourced content from being added. Ayub407talk 16:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Allow template editors to edit this editnotice. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 13:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Courcelles (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Highly visible page – Also semi-protect for the same reason. Gparyani (talk) 16:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:13, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But only for move protection, semi-protection was requested too and seems necessary. tutterMouse (talk) 14:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated WP:BLP violations by multiple IP users. Epic Genius (talk) 02:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 10:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Persistent vandalism from AfterOtso06's sockpuppets. Israel's Son 08:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Upon immediate removal of page protection, IP's again picked up in addition of original research, unexplained removals and blanking, as well as addition of unverifiable information by reliable source. livelikemusic my talk page! 12:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 monbths, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stephenb (Talk) 13:29, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 13:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP user keeps on reverting edits regarding "Last Club Before Tournament" without discussing on Talk Page--Maku17 (talk) 22:54, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone going to look into this? (I only fixed up the request if that's what is bothering you.) -- Orduin Discuss 22:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To force discussion. NeilN talk to me 23:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of sourced material by IP who doesn't believe Everest is considered the third pole. Burninthruthesky (talk) 18:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is not considered the third pole. I've never met anyone before who didn't know that. Repeatedly inserting false information is disruptive; ignoring the talk page is disruptive. You should stop being disruptive. 186.9.131.187 (talk) 18:51, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Have you met everyone? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Sarah (talk) 20:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sarah, pretty sure this is Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, might want to check their other reverts. --NeilN talk to me 20:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – i.p. vandal continues to add deliberate factual errors this page . Digifan23 (talk) 21:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Courcelles (talk) 19:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit-warring by IP to insert/restore clearly inappropriate/misleading/promotional material. (IP geolocates to Fairfield, Iowa, where the TM movement is based). I have edited in this topic area in the past, so I'm requesting an uninvolved admin to review this. Thanks. MastCell Talk 19:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree a semi protect would be a good idea, and perhaps a warning to the IP. I reverted the IP once but apparently he added unencyclopedic content again.(Littleolive oil (talk) 20:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC))[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarah (talk) 20:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You.(Littleolive oil (talk) 20:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC))[reply]

    • And MastCell, if these edits were somehow associated with the TM movement or organization or whatever, they're pretty darned ignorant given the appparant lack of understanding first of Wikipedia, and second of the history of that article and its most contentious sentence. What would be the point? Fairfield is a town of 11,000 or so with a population of about 3,000 who claim to be TM meditators not including a small university. There are numerous other new agey kinds of groups. Think of Boulder but much smaller with the same kind of new age vibe. Anyone could have decided to edit this article TM meditator or otherwise... and again starting TM does not make anyone a member of some movement.(Littleolive oil (talk) 20:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 22:51, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 23:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: To stop edit warring by a Wikipedia user known as Nikko11. Blockheadcitydara (talk) 16:49, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 16:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This is a Harry Potter character whose page attracts regular slash-inspired vandalism on multiple IPs. Long-running problem. Mezigue (talk) 19:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has been deleted and recreated multiple times, despite an identical draft being created and abandoned. I have left multiple warnings to the user specifically, but IPs keep re-adding the information. Primefac (talk) 19:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a note, there are some socks associated with this account, but this particular user has not been blocked despite being the apparent master. Primefac (talk) 19:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by one or more unregistered editors. ElKevbo (talk) 20:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations and WP:Edit warring by this IP; has already been warned. Flyer22 (talk) 20:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seven days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:51, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 17:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that this page definitely needs to be protected. Vandalism is constant and never-ending.Funkatastic (talk) 19:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Conifer (talk) 18:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 210 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 19:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protecting admin pre-emptively protected the template the same day it was created. No vandalism, no edits to that template except the TfD nomination. TL22 (talk) 19:54, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fuhghettaboutit? --NeilN talk to me 02:46, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Template G7'ed. See the TfD.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done due to deletion. tutterMouse (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 06:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:11, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:13, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent additions of BLP violations. One IP is blocked and another takes its place. Stabila711 (talk) 18:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP trolling. JoeSperrazza (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC) by 199.7.159.125 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Hello admin, this page has been subjected to persistent edits issues since 2008. A set of people have persistently attempted to update the rapper origin as Pakistani and it has always been reverted. Can you please check the page history? Requesting permanent page protection since the issue has been going on for almost 7 years now. Thanks. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 15:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People changing the final ranking. Kante4 (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Indefinitely semi-protected since November 2011, though it appears to have only been protected once before that. Pinging @Anthony Appleyard:. Conifer (talk) 08:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – To stop edit warring by an IP user. Calidum 04:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 06:15, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Use in almost all tennis cup articles. 333-blue 13:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:14, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumed sockpuppetry immediately upon expiry of previous protection. (See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/036386536a for details.). Psychonaut (talk) 08:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 10:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 5 albert square (talk) 13:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 10:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. 5 albert square (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Subject to a false rumor about an upcoming event that IP's keep adding unsourced info on. RF23 (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection due to potential addition of malicious code. I'm not sure what the rules about protection in a user's own user space are, though. Rubbish computer 02:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • (Non-administrator comment) My understanding is that no one can edit anyone else's personal settings pages (common.css/common.js/etc.), so I don't think protection is needed here as you are already the only person who can edit this page, though I might be wrong about this. Everymorning (talk) 02:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined What Everymorning said. NeilN talk to me 02:43, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks, I didn't know that. Rubbish computer 02:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 03:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I dream of horses, a rangeblock was put in place. NeilN talk to me 03:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: Good to hear! --I dream of horses (T) @ 03:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Since the only IP edits on the article since it was unprotected have been vandalism. Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract00:51, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:53, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant attempts to vandalize page with references to Deflategate even though he was not involved; pending changes does not seem effective to prevent it. 331dot (talk) 01:51, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:51, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed shortly after previous protection expired. Everymorning (talk) 02:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 02:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism to file page, no need for new users to edit file page. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: This page has been created 3 times this year, with each creation being unambiguous advertising or promotion. There is no indication of notability. --Rubbish computer 16:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Favonian (talk) 16:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Highly visible. My past request was for both move and semi, and the request was marked as "already protected" since it was already move-protected. Another user commented that it wasn't semi-protected, but the discussion was archived by the bot before anyone responded. Gparyani (talk) 16:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruptive editing recurs at odd intervals, so PC protection seems like a good option. Not enough recent problems to justify semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:14, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Has been subjected to persistent vandalism by unregistered IPs in the last few weeks adding bogus or uncited information and removing references from cited information. Cwmxii (talk) 17:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring between new, single-use accounts over controversial material. I am bringing the editors to the talk page to discuss this, however there is concern for continued Edit Warring and 3R. Thanks. Tiggerjay (talk) 17:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going addition of mass-genre changing, original research and unverifiable claims from IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:30, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous edit warring on verified and referenced content and refusal to discuss the matter on Talk page. Lewismaster (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Since Feb 2010, there have been numerous attempts to term Dalal has a "terrorist" (this is one of the first instances). Please provide full and indefinite protection. Thanks. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 14:43, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AKS.9955, please read our protection policy. I've noticed a couple of unjustified full protection requests from you. NeilN talk to me 14:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello NeilN, your call on this and no issues. However, I am a bit surprised that you have seen "few unjustified" full requests from me when the only other full protection request I placed was for Mr. Capone-E. Other requests I placed were for semi-protection (including this page in discussion). Please check the article history and you will notice that the page has a big history of vandalism, edit warring and content dispute. As an admin and in the interest to keep Wikipedia vandal free, I am requesting you to exercise your judgement in this matter and take a call. Thanks, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 14:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello NeilN, as I said, your call. All I requested was for you to have a look at the article history - that will give you an idea. At the cost of sounding repetitive, I am requesting you to exercise your judgement in this matter and take a call (for the level of protection required). Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 15:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP user(s) are consistently removing and changing sourced content, and they have been notified to no avail -side note this would be the second time FOX 52 (talk) 17:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP, high level of vandalism from multiple IPs. Pyutk (talk) 19:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Tedder. NeilN talk to me 19:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:49, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 14:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 13:53, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 14:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 13:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblock. Not sure this is vandalism but IP hopper has had numerous concerns expressed to them and never once responded. NeilN talk to me 14:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: - a central help page for Wikipedia users should be stable. None of the IP- and new account-edits since 2012 have been constructive. Repeated large-scale blanking or spam. GermanJoe (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 17:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs and new accounts continuously inserting gibberish. KateWishing (talk) 15:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Courcelles (talk) 16:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All 19 IP edits since 12 February 2015, and most of the IP edits before 12 February 2015, have been vandalism, often of the sneaky variety (introducing typos or changing numbers with a missing or misleading edit summary). Note that the page was previously protected under a different name (see [54]) so this would not be the first protection. Please consider long-term (if not indefinite) semi-protection. Psychonaut (talk) 16:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: This page has a full history of vandalism and hoaxes from IPs. 174.113.217.132 (talk) 02:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Longterm Semi-protection: For the past 4.5 months this article has received continuous BLP violations from IP-hopping (and edit-warring) IPs. Softlavender (talk) 03:25, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:49, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. Garchy (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 03:21, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Previously banned IP user (see article history in May) has resumed relentless edit-warring.  Volunteer Marek  03:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Add: Apparently this is a ban evading sock puppet with a history of long term abuse [55]. Volunteer Marek  03:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Karl Dickman. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism to edit the first paragraph by editor/s using multiple IPs. LondonMan (talk) 04:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over a long period of time (changing the name of the founders, etc...). Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:53, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring by block-evading IP user. clpo13(talk) 07:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Karl Dickman. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:54, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring by block-evading IP user. clpo13(talk) 07:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flagrantly false accusation of vandalism. Nothing of the sort here, just an uncontroversial straightforward improvement to the article that this user has reverted 6 times without explanation. 186.9.134.92 (talk) 07:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Edit warring involves two sides. You've been warned about this before and you've blatantly evaded your block by using related IPs. clpo13(talk) 07:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:55, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some users have been trying to mention that Dalal is a "terrorist". This issue has been discussed at length on the article Talkpage. Page history demonstrates the frequent attempts to change description. Please protect this page. Thanks. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salting Test-page magnet, title exists in mainspace. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 21:27, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakrtalk / 02:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An episode of a British TV series, into which there is an irresistible impulse to inject a current British politician in place of the fictional one of the episode, given a current incident in the news. It's probably a good idea to protect or semiprotect it and its parent episode-list article. *Dan T.* (talk) 01:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakrtalk / 02:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The article is being vandalized by IP user(s), particularly blanking sourced sections, and they have been notified to no avail - FOX 52 (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. John from Idegon (talk) 03:09, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 01:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 01:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 01:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I dream of horses, not sure why this is here. Article should have been speedy-delete tagged as a copyvio NeilN talk to me 01:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: Whoops! --I dream of horses (T) @ 01:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 01:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblock. NeilN talk to me 01:38, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 01:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Same two vandals as on Abdelkhalek Torres NeilN talk to me 01:43, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – As a result of a recent merge, this template now has 20,000+ transclusions. ~ RobTalk 03:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected. Courcelles (talk) 04:25, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: persistent ip removal of years active and refusal to join in talkpage discussion . Hell in a Bucket (talk) 04:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 04:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Ched, IHTS had agreed to stop the back and forth here, and it's been fifteen hours since the last revert. I think we are fine here for now. Also pinging CambridgeBayWeather for good measure. --kelapstick(bainuu) 21:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. IHTS was blocked but said they would not revert so no real need to protect. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 01:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 02:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 02:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dispute over how the episode list should be made. Gatordragon (talk) 19:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Both users are autoconfirmed, semiprotection will have no effect. Mind the 3RR. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced content mostly occurs in the "Dance chart" section by adding future dances without sourcing at all. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 20:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: High level of IP and new user vandalism. Long term pending changes would better resolve this than short term semi-protection. Thank you. Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract22:38, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • User talk:Connormah (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  • User talk pages
  • User talk pages are rarely protected, and are semi-protected for short durations only in the most severe cases of vandalism from IP users. Users whose talk pages are semi-protected should have an unprotected user talk subpage linked conspicuously from their main talk page to allow good faith comments from non-autoconfirmed users.
  • A user's request to have his or her own talk page protected is not a sufficient rationale to protect the page.

The talk page of this admin has been semiprotected since 2010, following what appears to have been a brief incidence of vandalism. Admins need to have unprotected talk pages to respond to user requests. The policy clearly prohibits permanent protection of active talk pages. Obviously, I can't inform Connormah about this request. --2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:1EF:5767:E7FB:31F9 (talk) 20:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There is an unprotected talk page (as required) located at User talk:Connormah/Unprotected Talk, which you may leave a message at. There is a link on Connormah's user talk page header. I will leave the ultimate decision to unprotect to Connormah. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That link does not appear in my browser's view of the talk page. Note that the policy is unequivocal about the requirement that semiprotection is for "short duration" only. I would hope that admins would be àble to enforce routine policy issues like this. Or is there some ambiguity I'm missing? --2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:1EF:5767:E7FB:31F9 (talk) 20:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Did you click on view source? I just tried it while logged out, and it shows up for me. I have also suggested a link to the unprotected page be placed in a more prominent location. Regardless, I have notified Connormah of this discussion. --kelapstick(bainuu) 20:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why would I click on view source? That's not something anyone would do as part of leaving a talk page message. If you and the other admin do not believe this policy is still in force than we either need to change the policy or find out why it isn't being enforced. Which do you suggest? --2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:1EF:5767:E7FB:31F9 (talk) 20:57, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I presumed that you hadn't, because it's not an intuitive thing to do. That is why I requested the link be placed in a more obvious location. I suggest you wait for a response here from Connormah, which is exactly what I intend to do. --kelapstick(bainuu) 21:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I see that Connormah is active. Can I leave it to you to see that the policy is enforced or changed, or do I need to pursue this myself? --2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:1EF:5767:E7FB:31F9 (talk) 21:14, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The user has made a dozen edits in the hour since you posted the notification on his talk page. It looks like he does not intend to make a reply. Since this involves admins failing to enforce unambiguous policy, it seems like the next venue is WP:ANI. --108.91.78.61 (talk) 21:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been linked to the page where you can communicate with this admin. If you actually have something to talk about there is a place for you to go. Are you trying to communicate with this admin or are you just trying to enforce the letter of some rule when the spirit is being followed? Chillum 00:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The admin is ignoring both my request to discuss the unprotection, and the comment/request left by Kelapstick. No one is offering any policy reason why this user talkpage is still semi-protected. Does the policy no longer exists as written? If so, I'll go propose some text to bring it into conformity with actual practice. --2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:1EF:5767:E7FB:31F9 (talk) 01:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the place, if an andmin ignores posts to their protected talkpage? Isn't this the place to get pages unprotected? --2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:1EF:5767:E7FB:31F9 (talk) 01:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Really a bad case of vandalism while the tournament was going on. –HTD 21:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. After unexpected win in the Rugby World Cup 2015 Johanvanl (talk) 21:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:51, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article was semi-protected before for the same reason, but as the protection ended, the edit warring IP editors returned. Unfortunately, it seems that they still do not want to discuss the issue on the Talk page, thus, another (probably longer) protection might be a solution. KœrteFa {ταλκ} 22:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 16:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Continual addition of unrealistic proposals (United States of Europe, U.S.-Canada unification, etc.).Nick Mitchell 98 (talk) 20:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Mind-numbingly juvenile IP vandalism, likely by blocked Smallphins (talk · contribs). Or possibly Norco is full of nitwits. Permanent pending changes if appropriate. DPRoberts534 (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The article has been created here, with "The" in the title, only once, but it's a continuation of the repetitive creation that has led to Zhejiang Circuit being protected. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by IP's who insist on adding an unsourced claim into the article's lead section. Rebecca1990 (talk) 17:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent long term disruption, in the form of unsourced content added by multiple accounts over an extended period. COI appears to be a motivating factor, with the addition of non notable persons apparently related to the article's creator. 2601:188:0:ABE6:517E:290E:27C2:A07A (talk) 17:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Piggate has been attracting quite a bit of vandalism to this page. Brustopher (talk) 18:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by socks of Najaf ali bhayo‎ - see SPI. General Ization Talk 02:42, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gparyani (talk) 03:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Requesting indefinite salting as this page has already been created twice and the creator has shown the willingness to use socks (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AllwynImmanuel) to interfere with deletion. --Non-Dropframe talk 15:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gogo Dodo. NeilN talk to me 16:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: New article being attacked for BLP violation edits from anon IPs. WayKurat (talk) 06:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – After User:AstroPanditji got a final warning for refspamming here a few days ago, three IP editors have tried to add the same link. McGeddon (talk) 09:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  09:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – See the Talk:Milla Jovovich for some history. To avoid edit warring, Kww suggested that we remove any references to the ethnicity of Jovovich's parents, which we did, but Serbian IPs are still popping up to edit war these things. The last suggestion was indefinite semi-protection. Nymf (talk) 11:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hell of vandalism on that article. Kante4 (talk) 12:43, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel (talk) 12:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by a 14.2 IP that is shifting around. Many edits over the last two days. Rangeblock likely impractical due to collateral damage. Recommend semi protection for two weeks to a month. Footy Freak7 (talk) 07:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Footy Freak7, if it starts up again straight away just flick me a talk page message and I'll deal with for longer. Daniel (talk) 12:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to remember that. Thanks. Footy Freak7 (talk) 12:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jc3s5h (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 13:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP repeatedly adding various unsourced, sometimes dubious content. Tried to engage on usertalk, but he/she is unresponsive. Requesting temporary semiprotection. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 17:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A single anon IP insists on adding non-notable information ["The University is not in the top 10 of X list"] despite requests to desist and has not responded to an explanation of wp:notability.
As of 21 September 2015, the article (at University of Buckingham#Reputation and rankings contains the non-notable 'information' because I see no point in continuing to revert while this IP can soapbox without sanction.

Not done John Maynard Friedman, those edits are disruptive and I've warned the editor making them again will result in a block. NeilN talk to me 23:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP6 vandalism. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 01:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel (talk) 12:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired 3 days ago and vandalism resumed soon afterward. Everymorning (talk) 02:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Double or nothing, I guess... Daniel (talk) 12:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistently targeted by socks of ROXELANA22. General Ization Talk 18:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Evidently a bug in Twinkle, as I chose "Request page protection", Reason: "Sockpuppetry (semi)" and Duration: "Temporary" and that's where it put it. General Ization Talk 19:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, semi doesn't seem to be doing the job, so I'm looking for an increase to any protection that will. General Ization Talk 19:41, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: SONDERRADAR (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:21, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent target for vandalism and general disruptive edits from IP users . Calidum 23:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recently announced as taking control of 4chan. There will be a lot of vandalism for the next few weeks at least. There has already been some. I'd recommend a 3 month semi-protection (that's the one that requires auto-confirmed users, right?) and go from there. 97.90.151.30 (talk) 00:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary and possibly indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Many anon IP test edits reverted automatically. Semi is probably too much work. PC would be better. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 17:38, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism on a weekly basis for several months, anonymous posters likely VMI grads are routinely changing existing information and data, also posting taunting messages on the article talk page as well as on my personal talk page. Bob80q (talk) 17:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption over the last few hours after a tough Eagles loss last night. EricEnfermero (Talk) 20:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 21:09, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is subject to vandalism in general, and seems to be the object of particular attention today. Prof. Mc (talk) 15:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 15:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I'm requesting that my user page be indefinitely semi-protected (or semi-protected for as long a length of time as possible) due to persistent vandalism. The page just came off a two week period of semi-protection, and it has been vandalized within 48 hours. That vandalism is ongoing now. I do counter-vandalism on a semi-regular basis, so it's likely that my page will remain a target. ~ RobTalk 20:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 20:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: AfterOtso06, through the use of sockpuppets, keeps on recreating Ej Santos. The other three seems to be plausible, so they should not be exempted. Israel's Son 20:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Ej Santos only NeilN talk to me 22:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 23:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See edit history. ukexpat (talk) 13:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: High traffic page. 333-blue 13:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. NeilN talk to me 13:55, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 17:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP disruption suddenly. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 11:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 12:15, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. DVdm (talk) 16:08, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 16:37, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 17:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:28, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This guy (Borcker, throwaway accounts, various IPs) is not letting up. GABHello! 13:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors over the last few weeks. . Chamith (talk) 14:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:55, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unprotected recently, this page is witnessing editing tests and removal of content. Requires protection for a reasonably longer period. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Dispute has been discussed on talk page of article and user. Gal777 has rejected all discussion and warnings to continue reverting the page to his or her preferred version. clpo13(talk) 08:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Gal is blocked so that should be fine, but if the edit war continues feel free to re-request protection. Swarm 08:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Redirect war continuing after expiry of previous 3-day protection. : Noyster (talk), 11:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Subject is facing a criminal trial for allegations of a serious crime which I'd rather not mention here. This has led to vandals editing his page with crude affirmations of guilt. '''tAD''' (talk) 11:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One of the editors is displaying ownership and reverting major edits wholesale. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Promotional info being re-added by probable undisclosed COI. Violation of three revert. . Variation 25.2 (talk) 06:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Swarm 07:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP-hopping POV pusher who fills his edit comments with racist slurs. -Zanhe (talk) 07:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 07:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There is a slow edit war going on between a number of IP and new editors about the caste of the subject for more than a year now. If not protection need admin attention at least. SMS Talk 08:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 08:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: THIS IS FOR THE SPANISH VERSION ONLY. Other languages are ok. Persistent vandalism. Marcos Aguinis is a public figure, best selling writer in Argentina. Page is being vandalized, content erased on a regular basis. Unregistered users delete content and add their political views to the biography.73.205.228.80 (talk) 22:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined — This is the English site. The Spanish site has its own place for requesting page protection. --slakrtalk / 01:42, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 05:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 07:38, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism as a result of recent controversy. Azealia911 talk 06:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 07:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unregistered users TheBellaTwins1445 (TheBellaTwins1445) 9:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 07:37, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The page is already under an edit filter which stops all edits from users whose accounts are under a month old and have less than 500 edits from posting, per discretionary sanctions. The article is still semi-protected on top of this because (in the protecting admin's words) "editing and then not being able to save would just be annoying so I will save new users and IPs this hassle." Quite a lot of IPs have been caught in the filter since semi-protection expired. Can the page be semi-protected again, so they don't have to go through the annoyance of writing a long post and then seeing it blocked by the filter?. Brustopher (talk) 00:19, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done by another admin --slakrtalk / 01:37, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing dispute on unreferenced content - will attempt to resolve in the morning but it's currently nearing an edit war. Apologies it's late, reviewing the dates, I mean to say it could well descend into an edit war again soon. samtar (msg) 01:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 02:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost continuous stream of vandalism by new/IP editors. Everymorning (talk) 02:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 03:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant promotional linkfarming from SPA accounts. McGeddon (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Every edit by an IP since this came off temporary (three-month) semi-protection 10 days ago has been vandalism. Except for LBJ and Ford, I believe the articles for every US President since Kennedy has indefinite semi-protection. Thanks! - Location (talk) 22:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 22:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of a breaking NFL trade. Vandalism related to the player he is replacing. EricEnfermero (Talk) 23:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

24 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – If you're going to salt Davison Electrical, salt this title, too. I dream of horses (T) @ 19:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've indef blocked the creator NeilN talk to me 19:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected indefinitely. Per this NeilN talk to me 19:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Might want to salt this one, too. I dream of horses (T) @ 19:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've indef blocked the creator NeilN talk to me 19:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected indefinitely. Per this NeilN talk to me 19:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Block evasion. McGeddon (talk) 19:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 19:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – List constantly sees inclusion of non-notable individuals; likely people adding themselves or acquaintances. Is nearly a daily occurrence and a majority of such edits come from IPs or accounts with no other edits, with minority of IP edits being constructive (have been a few of latter). -- dsprc [talk] 15:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of vandalism today from apparent meat or sock puppets. Shearonink (talk) 17:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. Elizium23 (talk) 18:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. If consensus forms, please get an admin to do the move. NeilN talk to me 19:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Like other Call of Duty video games, notably Call of Duty: Black Ops II and Call of Duty: Black Ops III, this page has near constant vandalism. Please set a long term semiprot. -- ferret (talk) 19:07, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been recreated three times, is now a candidate for CSD...again. I dream of horses (T) @ 19:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 19:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent and ongoing slow burning edit war/content dispute with socks attempting to add hoax/unsourced information. Judging by today's actions the dispute seems to be picking up again with a new sock. Requesting semi- but would like to propose pending changes to discourage the edit war but allow unconfirmed users to constructively contribute. Thanks. samtar (msg) 13:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined samtar, the link should be treated as spam. Blocked the registered account. If the IP shows up, it should be blocked as well. NeilN talk to me 13:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Understood - thanks for jumping on that block.samtar (msg) 13:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 17:07, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.Caerus612 (talk) 17:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some anon user on dynamic IP range doing disruptive edits. SMS Talk 18:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:27, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Virtually all IP contributions here revolve around sexual innuendos about some individual or another being gay. You can implement various levels of temporary semi-protection, but the problem will remain endemic and will return as soon as the protection time-frame is up. I realize I cannot request indefinite page semi-protection, but I can pretty much guarantee that's where this is going to lead eventually (see faggot and gay). KDS4444Talk 00:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 08:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  11:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 13:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism returns after previous 1 month block (July – August). Suggest a 3 months protection allowing only autoconfirmed users to edit. Wolbo (talk) 14:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP singularly focused on this article keeps making unsourced and unsubstantiated changes, with no attempts at discussion. Semi-protection will hopefully elicit discussion from IP. --IJBall (contribstalk) 18:59, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 22:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a flood of POV-pushing edits from IPs, probably the result of a TV show or something. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: for the last couple days the article has been subject to vandalism including blanking of sections and/or the entire article. Hopefully a few days protection will shoo them off. MarnetteD|Talk 14:05, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:09, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. An unknown user has modified correct information several times. And this user is modifying it again, after the end of the last semi-protection. Scheridon (talk) 17:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 22:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nutter going on for 1+ month about subject being pregnant. . -- Sam Sailor Talk! 23:04, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 23:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Was indefinitely semi-protected in March 2009 with no prior history of protection. The protecting admin has since been desysopped. Conifer (talk) 02:26, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 03:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 23:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That article... wasn't what I was expecting. NeilN talk to me 23:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.--MASHAUNIX 23:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Long-term persistent vandalism by IPs and new users.--MASHAUNIX 23:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 1 week, PC 3 months NeilN talk to me 23:16, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 23:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:33, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated nonsensical edits and vandalism in a short amount of time. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 21:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP edits in the past day. clpo13(talk) 21:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NawlinWiki. NeilN talk to me 22:33, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: IP users sometimes do good thing in current tournaments. 333-blue 13:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done When I semied it, there was an awful lot of unhelpful IP edits. Registered editors seem to be keeping the article up to date. BTW Orduin, for some reason I never got a notification. NeilN talk to me 17:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection. Blisspop (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: your userpage is not protected and creating a false response in the name of an unused username borders on disruptive editing. Nthep (talk) 17:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined For bot NeilN talk to me 18:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

25 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – School article with the usual vandalism. Coretheapple (talk) 14:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:04, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits made for two months, most recent edits were pure vandalism by anon users. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 17:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:58, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 18:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I request protection in order to avoid vandal edits by random IPs and unconfirmed users. Arjann (talk) 12:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Could you link to a few of the vandalistic edits? MusikAnimal talk 22:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  13:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit warring - Several accounts, registered within recent weeks of each other, have resumed the continued edit war Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. There appear to be longterm puppetry issues as well, but I am not familiar with those details and will defer to another administrator on that. I am respectfully requesting that this page be fully protected for a short period so that this may be sorted. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 17:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I will place a note on the corresponding article talk page in the hopes of encouraging a discussion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 17:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous semi-protection expired yesterday. Disruptive editing resumed today. Times of India quoted an expert in the area calling "attempts [on wikipedia] to establish that Feroze Gandhi was Muslim", common. I agree. Long term semi-protection seems warranted. Abecedare (talk) 17:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ips are reverting edits which were made through consensus. 115ash→(☏) 10:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Consensus really isn't clear; as far as I can see, two users have agreed it, and IPs were involved in the discussion. GedUK  12:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is consistently being attacked by the i.p.s. MahenSingha (Talk) 11:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  12:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: an IP editor is currently engaged in an edit war over the "controversy" section. Claims to be restoring balance to the article, but appears to be an attempt to remove criticism of the game. Page has quickly become unstable. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 13:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 13:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly recreated. I dream of horses (T) @ 17:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected kelapstick(bainuu) 17:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly recreated. I dream of horses (T) @ 17:06, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected kelapstick(bainuu) 17:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 08:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Only one vandalizer who is set to be blocked if they vandalize again. Airplaneman 09:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Every IP edit in the last five days has either changed information to make it incorrect (dates of matches), changed names in the squads, or just blanked sections. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Geraldo Perez (talk) 12:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - the vandalism started up immediately after the previous protection expired, and I would suggest if further vandalism occurs after this protection, it may be worth considering putting it in place indefinitely. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection, to protect against the recent recurring edits adding silly refs by two or three IP users. IP users have added the same material five times,and it has been reverted four times by genuine users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by New Media Theorist (talkcontribs) 21:21, 24 September 2015

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. A talk page post explaining the issues would be helpful. NeilN talk to me 22:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
sorry but I count three registered users and two IP's, which makes 4-5 users, not 1-2 users. You revert also missed the main content the IP editors are so insistently adding.New Media Theorist (talk) 00:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
New Media Theorist, my revert did not miss anything. I only intended to revert the obvious test edit. As for the other content, edit summaries aren't really enough to explain to uninvolved editors why the sources should be disregarded. --NeilN talk to me 00:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent target of various IP editors adding material from non-RS and disruption. Given the recent news on the subject, it would be best to semi protect for a few days. - Cwobeel (talk) 22:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 06:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 19:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - seems like it has stopped. AlexiusHoratius 03:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JayJ47 (talk) 08:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 09:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war regarding whether non-notable radio presenters should be included on the page. clpo13(talk) 09:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 09:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted at AfD, and recreated by socks after the original author was blocked. McGeddon (talk) 18:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent target of WP:BLP vandalism by various IP editors, watchlisting the article has proven insufficient. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 22:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 01:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring of a single bit in the lede, no talk page action, shifting IPV6 editors. John from Idegon (talk) 03:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Take a quick gander at the page history. —DangerousJXD (talk) 04:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Again and again, 4th or 5th time this month, 3 IPs with various vandalisms...Ashur (talk) 07:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC) One more unexplanied edit by an IP reverted.Ashur (talk) 15:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:27, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:15, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 16:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unconstructive edits. Kayser491 (talk) 14:46, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Kayser491: How are the edits unconstructive? MusikAnimal talk 22:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The information is deleted from the Template by IP. Please see the editis history. Kayser491 (talk) 00:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry, I misread it as the other way around. Going with one month as that might be all it takes to force discussion MusikAnimal talk 04:48, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Current news. As soon as protection expired page started getting vandalized. Volunteer Marek  01:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:06, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attracts BLP vandalism from IP editors and new accounts as this is a well-known, high-profile person. Gparyani (talk) 02:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war between two IP users. clpo13(talk) 04:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done due to an3 closure --slakrtalk / 05:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring over whether or not to insert an image. The image itself (File:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali interviewing MNA chitral for Khyber News TV Khowar Programme Chhetraro Hawaz voice of chitral.jpg) is subject to copyright concerns at Commons but that's not an excuse to edit war. I'd say a day or two as the image should either be deleted or someone will provide the explanation by then. Thanks! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Quietened down, I think. NeilN talk to me 20:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This page will become a high-risk page due to the coup d'état of 2015 (just last week)

This page may start to be vandalised due to the protests and more possible coup d'états. Fdizile (developer) 19:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. NeilN talk to me 19:20, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aristophanes68 (talk) 22:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long history of vandalism, unsourced POV additions, and disruption. GABHello! 00:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Quite a bit of IP vandalism. Page is linked from the front page via WP:ITN. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Somehow, some people are disturbed by the corpse photo enough to remove it. Currently, RM is ongoing, and there will be changes. George Ho (talk) 04:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs petty deliberate misspelling of article title. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 18:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Near-daily unsourced trivia by IPs and disruptive editing. ArcticGriffin (talk) 19:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.Some IPs are continously adding wrong info so Protect it so that only Autoconfirmed users can edit in it, 2.89.217.66 (talk) 17:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – between two sides with reverts spread across a period of more than 24 hours, so not an AN3 case. Its time for admin intervention of some kind, if not full protection on a page that is under the purview of Standard Discretionary sanctions. . SMS Talk 15:19, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Posted on talk page NeilN talk to me 18:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism by registered users. Vandalism continues with multiple warning. Ilovechristianmusic (talk) 17:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 18:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting protection for 1 month. Vandalism, unsourced edits following ongoing departure from Chelsea football club and pending lawsuit. Shreerajtheauthor (talk) 18:09, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. UnBiased Editing (talk) 21:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of vandalism today . Aristophanes68 (talk) 22:27, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

26 September 2015

Full Protection: Edit War. Koonter (talk) 20:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The editor in question, Koonter, has been constantly, without any explanation: removing sourced information (along with its sources) making full reverts of my own edits (not just the controversial issue), inserting information that is not per the sources he is citing (violation of WP: OR), and ignores what his own sources are saying. Attempt at sourced compromise wording was made (removed again) as well as a civil discussion at his talk page, with him ignoring most of what I said and even making accusations of bias (not per WP: Assuming good faith), while continuing with his own narrative. I have stopped myself from reverting him further because I reverted him already 3 times, while he himself has reverted me 3 times already. Thus the latest version of the article is with the information not being per the sources cited and other chunks of sourced info being removed. If the article should be fully protected than an administrator should revert it before that to the last good edit, before the edit war started. Which was this one [58]. Regards! EkoGraf (talk) 20:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Not that out of hand. How about giving the talk page a try? It looks very lonely MusikAnimal talk 15:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP editor continues to edit war on the page. Attempts at dispute resolution are ongoing on the talk page, but edit war in article continues. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 22:27, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Other constructive edits coming from unconfirmed users. Not fair to semi-protect because of a single editor. I've warned them about edit warring MusikAnimal talk 16:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi-protection of my user talk page due to repeated instances of vandalism and personal attacks from IPs. Thank you. — Cirt (talk) 22:48, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 16:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 21:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 15:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from various IP editors. Please note that this article was recently semi-protected on 4 September 2015 by Callanecc due to WP:BLP violations [59] which has since expired. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 22:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 15:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level of protional contents are being added by undisclosed COI and ip. After the coi editor was blocked, same highly spammy contents have been added by ip. Needs revertiom of the spammy contents and full protection of the article. 37.46.75.70 (talk) 08:10, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-Protection: Pertinent information that is well sourced and cited at constant risk of vandalism or removal, especially pertaining to "Notable Events". Bend Oregon (Bend Oregon) —Preceding undated comment added 10:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 15:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-Protection: Pertinent information that is well sourced and cited at constant risk of vandalism or removal, especially pertaining to "Notable Events". Bend Oregon (Bend Oregon) —Preceding undated comment added 10:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 15:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 16:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A few IP editors have been adding schedules of radio presenters and reverting removal of that information. clpo13(talk) 16:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I just came here to add more or less the same request but then saw that this request was already here. I am not sure if there are several IP editors or it is one person hopping their IPs, either deliberately or incidentally. Either way, I support this request for protection and hope that it will be enough to persuade the IP editor that we have the tools necessary to prevent disruption and that there is no point in continuing this foolishness. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – new editors adding BLP violations . Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 17:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 17:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and adding of unsourced/unverifiable information by IPs. LLArrow (talk) 02:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:10, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Amaury (talk) 03:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article has been subject to vandalism from anonymous users who are adding hoaxes, saying that the station will go all K-pop by next year. Israel's Son 04:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 21:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism to filmography since release of Adult Swim Rick and Morty parody https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLB4dU3Yc6M perhaps a pop culture reference, but not a filmography item. --Dual Freq (talk) 02:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection to nip teen-age vandalism, name-checks and such in the bud. BMK (talk) 04:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persistent IP vandalism due to a reported, yet not official, sports transaction. --Miamiheat631Talk 04:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: - Constant addition of trivia and fan cruft material. This article has bascially turned into a TV Guide. I only came across it when editors done the same to Good Morning Britain. Which got semiprotected and resolved. WP:NOTTVGUIDE WP:IINFO WP:FANCRUFT This is one of the edits containing the fan cruft material which kept getting reverted. [60]. Thank You -- JohnGormleyJG () 13:00, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 14:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 15:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of MfD template. KH-1 (talk) 14:06, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. MusikAnimal talk 20:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism threatened from forum sites. Threats coming from LGBT and anti-semetic discrimination against the makers and actors of upcoming webseries GEN ZED.4.16.25.131 (talk) 20:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. If I understand you correctly, that is. Otherwise it's been over 24 hours since the last edit, and I don't see much blatant disruption MusikAnimal talk 21:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP sock of LanguageXpert edit warring. SMS Talk 09:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same request for Punjab, Pakistan also. -- SMS Talk 09:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —SpacemanSpiff 14:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On this page regularly added false flag. No authorized sources that can confirm the correctness of the flag. I encountered such a situation for the first time. As a rule, people do not have flags . It is not a state or a region of a state. Please, protect the page. --Bolgarhistory (talk)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 17:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – If it's possible to have semi-protection and pending changes applied to an article, consider this a request for it. (Article is targetted by a long-term sock using sleeper accounts to write gibberish.) If it's not, never mind; semi-protection alone saves more effort than pending changes alone would. McGeddon (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done McGeddon, PC level 2 would be useful here as Reviewers must accept changes. However level 2 is not used on English Wikipedia. Level 1 (any autoconfirmed editor's changes are accepted) is useless if semi-protect is on. NeilN talk to me 17:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, wasn't sure what the deal was. --McGeddon (talk) 17:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aristophanes68 (talk) 18:27, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @Aristophanes68: Vandalism by one user should be reported to WP:AIV. NeilN talk to me 18:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

27 September 2015

Icarus (film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection

Persistent vandalism by an unknown IP address. Request is made because editors cannot spend their time manually reverting the edits on a daily basis. - Metal121 (talk) 15:53, 27 September 2015 (GMT)

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 15:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Dispute over the citing of particular sources. GABHello! 15:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pretty low key right now. Posted on talk page. Feel free to re-report if edit warring heats up. NeilN talk to me 15:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. GABHello! 15:26, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry by editor who disputes that Afghanis are considered Persian. clpo13(talk) 21:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protection against new accounts because of sockpuppeting. --Qualitatis (talk) 14:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 14:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: There's an ongoing campaign by an IP on this page to remove any references that show a diagnoses of Asperger syndrome. The subject is a biography of a spree killer. Hundr (talk) 05:40, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Discussion is ongoing and the IP's points are not without merit. Plus, WP:BLPPRIMARY. NeilN talk to me 14:26, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A large amount of recent vandalism from IP adresses. -- haminoon (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page was recently full-protected due to recent controversial news items. Contentious edits were made by an IP soon after the protection lifted. The topic is still "hot." I suggest it be put under indefinite semi-protection. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding the request. And similar protection will surely be needed at Death of Subhas Chandra Bose; the current protection is scheduled to expire in a few hours. Abecedare (talk) 21:00, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected MusikAnimal talk 16:52, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: As to the strict correctness of this article, I have started a discussion on AMD official forum, https://community.amd.com/message/2673567. I wish AMD engineers or fans would evaluate this article carefully, so I require this article to be protected until some proper changes or suggestions would be put on it. Thank you! 175.17.63.201 (talk) 13:11, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. And its talk page also protected, please! Stop modifying or archiving for all the related talks, please! 175.17.63.201 (talk) 13:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please read our protection policy. Articles are not protected until they are "evaluated". NeilN talk to me 13:57, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – We have an IP hopping editor who keeps on trying to replace the real singer with this band with the unreferenced claim that it is somebody else, presumably herself. A period of semi-protection should help. The band is not active and so this article would not be expected to get much editing under normal circumstances anyway so maybe a few weeks of protection would not upset anybody?. DanielRigal (talk) 13:33, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Will keep an eye out for socks NeilN talk to me 13:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of fan edits of highly popular release by mega-popular boy band by IP's and anonymous users. Page should at least be protected until its 13 November 2015 release date. livelikemusic my talk page! 12:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Elockid for 24 hours. tutterMouse (talk) 16:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Philip J Fry (talk) 11:17, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:30, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of hoaxes from anonymous users, saying that the channel, which is a local franchise, is also broadcasting in Canada. That's ironic, though. Israel's Son 14:59, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Upgrade from pending changes to semi-protection; for those occasional new editors undeterred by a massive "Do not create your first article on this page!" warning when editing here, we may as well save their time and ours by not allowing them to enter and submit any content. McGeddon (talk) 13:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: As NeilN protected this, and is around, I'll ping him for comment. GedUK  13:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ged UK: I extended your PC to indefinite :-) No objection to turning it into a semi. --NeilN talk to me 13:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
NeilN, are you meant to put in that plus RfPP icon template? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:00, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I put an indefinite PC on the article about a week ago, following McGeddon's lead. I'm on the fence about turning it into a semi but certainly won't object if another admin semi's it (or declines to). --NeilN talk to me 15:50, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected - New editors are not coming to this page with bad intentions; they just don't know they are in the wrong place. Semiprotection will reduce the wasted time for all parties. EdJohnston (talk) 13:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: There's a slow edit-war by a pro-Russian government IP-hopping editor to remove negative statements about the nature of Ruptly‎, even though they are sourced in accordance with Wikipedia policy. The editor has been warned about edit-warring - see User talk:178.164.253.214 and User talk:94.21.149.246. Given the nature of the topic, it is likely that the editor edits as an IP because their accounts have been blocked.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:09, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article persistently being vandalized. . Ayub407talk 13:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users(possibly just one user using proxies to change their address) have never quite left this page alone since semiprotection was last placed, mostly with inane arguments on the talk page. Could perhaps use a longer stint of protection that outlasts their attention span. Cannolis (talk) 19:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The same user has also refactored the talk page to remove previous discussions about his or her behavior. clpo13(talk) 22:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Thanks for pointing that out, clpo13. I think there's only one disruptive IP address involved with the article? NeilN talk to me 22:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. 185.93.35.151 (talk · contribs) has added comments to the talk page that sound like 98.208.27.208 (talk · contribs) but hasn't touched the article page. 185.93.35.186 (talk · contribs) has made some disruptive edits on the article. clpo13(talk) 22:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: I'm pretty sure that blocked IP user is back. There appears to be a very obvious sock-fest on the talk page right now. clpo13(talk) 03:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:28, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content added by multiple IPs. Coretheapple (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Obviously same user. Warned for edit warring and will block if further reverts occur. NeilN talk to me 22:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Important philosopher - Well written article up to this point. Geodon93 (talk) 01:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Geodon93, no policy based reason to protect. NeilN talk to me 02:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Currently has semi protection, and this is not keeping editors from edit warring/adding unsourced information. An attempt to discuss this is ongoing on the talk page, but requesting pending changes until this is resolved. samtar (msg) 07:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done samtar, semi-protection is more restrictive than pending changes. NeilN talk to me 18:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
trout Self-trout NeilN, well now I feel a bit silly.. samtar (msg) 23:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from different editors. Kante4 (talk) 09:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The main disruptive IP has been blocked. I see some constructive IP edits. NeilN talk to me 22:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:06, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Dispute resolved. NeilN talk to me 07:04, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP with likely a previous history (see edits from early June on a different yet related article) is snap-reverting/undoing a stable revision of the article, falsely claiming vandalism but in turn reinstating a previously poorly written revision. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 20:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 22:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Appears to be related to recent Mecca tragedy. Coretheapple (talk) 18:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 22:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of MfD template. Needs to be protected due to sockpuppetry. KH-1 (talk) 02:31, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Because it's been deleted Cyberbot, because it's been deleted. NeilN talk to me 02:52, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Philip J Fry (talk) 05:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: - Long term problem with IP's coming to the page and making unexplained changes. I assume at least part of the reason for this is that the article is a ranking of countries and some people want to see their country ranked higher than it officially was. I've had the page protected previously [61] but it only lasted 3 months so I needed to come here and request this. Thanks. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 12:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake; the above diff is for another time the article was protected. An earlier protection which I initiated took place here [62] and lasted for 1 month. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 19:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stronger semi-protection: Vandal's edits to the TCM Remembers section continue despite the page being pending-change protected. Will next request the user and his or her IP be blocked. --ThylekShran (talk) 18:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined PC seems to be adequate. NeilN talk to me 18:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. Okay. :) --ThylekShran (talk) 18:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated addition of biased and/or irrelevant content by anonymous editors. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 19:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. NeilN talk to me 22:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

28 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 14:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this article has been redirected to its school district article per school article notability guidelines and AfD outcomes. John from Idegon (talk) 14:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done As it was redirected and disruption may cease as a result, but the target page has been semi-protected for a period of 3 days MusikAnimal talk 16:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Greater level of protection needed as there's continuous edit warring without talk page discussion. 217.44.219.201 (talk) 18:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 19:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created, This article needs indefinite recreation protection.  MONARCH Talk to me 16:43, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator NawlinWiki. NeilN talk to me 17:47, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of sourced content in favor of unsourced. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 17:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism, Troll edit this page always and make fun of Adnan's Nationality, it is highly sensitive issue. vaibhavthedestroyer--- 12:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 12:47, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 13:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 13:59, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and vandalizing the article by IPs. Achayan (talk) 07:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 11:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: temporary protection due to high level of IP vandalism due to recent event. Melcous (talk) 13:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Could it be semi-protected so that only established users can edit the article? Each time it has been unprotected, IP Addresses would vandalize the article by removing content without explaining why. It was semi-protected for a while, and, since the semi-protection was lifted, IP Addresses have once again come back and vandalized the article. Claudia Kishi (talk) 13:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Lots of libellous bantery jokes; presumably the DJs told all their breakfast show listeners an hour ago that they should have their own Wikipedia page. McGeddon (talk) 08:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated BLP vios by hopping IP. Nymf (talk) 10:38, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 1 week, PC 1 month NeilN talk to me 11:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: Repeated removal of cited content by registered and IP editors who only edit this page. Edwardx (talk) 11:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly recreated, including on 25 November 2013, 1 February 2014, 20 March 2014, 27 March 2014, 29 June 2014, and more recently, 7 June 2015, 17 September 2015. As a result of these repeated recreations, three AfD discussions were carried out: AfD 1, AfD 2, AfD 3. Each AfD resulted in a consensus to either redirect or merge to Alpha and Omega (film)#Sequels, and none of the recreations provide significant new information that would justify recreation. Mz7 (talk) 22:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:32, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No protection request has been made since protection expired last year. George Ho (talk) 17:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection, along with creation protection of all variations of this name: Created by an Orangemoody SPA sock, could be created again by new socks. --Rubbish computer 20:33, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After it is deleted, I mean. --Rubbish computer 21:00, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:39, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi-protection due to vandalism and disruption from multiple different IP sources. — Cirt (talk) 03:34, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Can an admin SALT this page until the issues with RMCD bot are resolved?. Avicennasis @ 04:06, 15 Tishrei 5776 / 04:06, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Can an admin SALT this page until the issues with RMCD bot are resolved?. Avicennasis @ 04:07, 15 Tishrei 5776 / 04:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:59, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep simplifying dates to just years without giving a valid reason in the edit summary. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:41, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Two issues. 1) Removal of sourced negative material with misleading edit summaries 2) Straightforward BLP violations. I protected last time but restored material since then. NeilN talk to me 21:15, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:43, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP user is edit warring over the genre without providing reliable sources or discussing on talk page. Calidum 00:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued removal of valid revert of song that fails notability for music songs. livelikemusic my talk page! 00:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-level of test edits and disruptive edits by IP's and anonymous editors, continuing to add the same information over-and-over again. livelikemusic my talk page! 00:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persitent vandalism for at least the past month, and it won't stop. Please semi-protect this article for the remainder of the NFL season (i.e., until February 2016). --bender235 (talk) 01:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going vandalism and disruptive editing patterns from IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic my talk page! 01:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Not sure what to do about an IP hopper who is using the page to attack editors, bringing in their edits on other pages as part of his/her attack. . Doug Weller (talk) 13:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Within a week of expiry of protection, editing tests have been resumed. . Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking block evasion by User:Fuckturnip. McGeddon (talk) 12:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The TV series has supposedly ended, with the last episode airing on Friday (September 25). However, various users, many IP or newly registered, have been indicating in series overview table that September 25 is the date of the last aired, but either without a source or with one considered self-published [63], which may not satisfy the requirements for reliable sourcing. As a result, a disputed tag has been added to the series overview entry, alerting concerned editors to go to the talk page to discuss the matter and perhaps come up with a reliable source indicating the official end of the series. Despite that, at least one IP user is removing this disputed tag, which needs to be present so a reliable source can eventually be found. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:

There is persistent edit warring going on, and its origins go back 10 months now: For a long time, the article had a section called "Inspiration in the Gaia theory." I noticed this past spring that it had been removed by Toby Tyrrell himself, perhaps the most prominent critic of Gaia theory at this time, with only the following note:

10:32, 14 November 2014‎ Tobytyrrell (talk | contribs)‎ . . (3,596 bytes) (-5,916)‎ . . (removed section of little relevance (about the Gaia hypothesis rather than Earth system science)) (undo | thank)

There was no Talk page to speak of then, but I started an active conversation there, complaining about this removal as an extreme COI, as the reputation of the Tyrrell, his book with Princeton University Press, etc, was dependent on these things - Earth system science and Gaia theory - seeming unrelated, although even he had come close to equating the two in at least one passage of his book. I then tried to rework the concept of the prior editor, adding more about the history of the interrelationship of these two fields, well-cited statements from prominent figures and academic textbooks about their relationship, etc. The material has been continuously removed by three highly aggressive editors ever since.

Terradactyl (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Terradactyl, this protection is probably saving you from a block for edit warring. I strongly suggest you use the talk page and wait for discussion. NeilN talk to me 02:38, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are constantly removing the sourced information that she married Ben Koldyke. JDDJS (talk) 01:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Four IP editors have vandalized over the past few hours. ~ RobTalk 03:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 20:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. A couple days ago. NeilN talk to me 20:42, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:14, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator JohnCD. NeilN talk to me 00:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple instances of IP vandalism today, probably because the subject has been in the news. A few days of semi-protection would be helpful. MelanieN alt (talk) 00:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Abuse of privileges, personal attack comments. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined ViperSnake151, removing talk page access from the account is what is usually done and I've done so. NeilN talk to me 19:58, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. clpo13(talk) 21:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Undiscussed page move, multiple changes against WP:GNL policy and suspected self-promotion by suspected sock of User:Outdoorsmen2000, who has used a number of of previous socks to edit this article since blocked in 2014. SPI opened at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Outdoorsmen2000. General Ization Talk 22:48, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Semi won't be effective against autoconfirmed sock who I have blocked NeilN talk to me 22:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page has been protected for ages and I'd like to edit it, thanks! Craig87x (talk) 18:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Elockid --NeilN talk to me 18:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OP has been blocked as a sockpuppet, so request is void. BMK (talk) 19:52, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Blocked by me. NeilN talk to me 19:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

29 September 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chamith (talk) 12:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The IP edits all appear to be one-off tests, and even if they weren't, there are still some other good-faith edits in the last week that were kept. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Godsy(TALKCONT) 16:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Bgwhite for one month. KrakatoaKatie 19:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newsworthy, attracting people with something unencyclopaedic to say about this unfortunate gentleman ... becoming a bit of a drag for other editors. . DBaK (talk) 17:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 18:57, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. Mahfuzur rahman shourov (talk) 07:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I assume you meant the target, 2015 Mina disaster. Too many good edits by IPs and new editors that would get shut down. NeilN talk to me 11:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:59, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: This article has been attempted to move three times by same user, a user that also has a habbit of cut and past moves and must be stopped. . Qed237 (talk) 14:29, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Moved page back to Gevorgian Seminary and protected. NeilN talk to me 15:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Original protecting admin added PC1 after request, but forgot to remove semi-protection. Conifer (talk) 21:53, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 13:49, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Request indefinite pending changes application due to BLP violations. — Cirt (talk) 23:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Boxingmojo (talk · contribs) blocked by CambridgeBayWeather (talk · contribs) CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:51, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. NewMutants (talk) 09:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. NeilN talk to me 11:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent spamming by IP-hopping editor. Deli nk (talk) 11:53, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Weatherboxes keep being added by the same IP despite consensus not have them, The IP's returned under a new IP just to insert the box so I'm guessing he's not going to give up, Anyway thanks. –Davey2010Talk 20:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:45, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated insertion of promotional material, unrelated to the original content, by an unregistered editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:13, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. It's been several days since the last disruptive edit, and all of them have been by the same IP editor. Report him if he continues to AIV, but blocking isn't necessary here.--Slon02 (talk) 02:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (C) @ 04:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Slon02 (talk) 04:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant disruptive edits done on this page since i have reverted the edits. DerevationGive Me Five 12:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 01:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Website shutdown today. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 22:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Bobherry, I don't see much in the way of disruption? NeilN talk to me 01:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Once again, we have an SPA trying to whitewash history. This keeps on happening, which is why I'm requesting indefinite protection. Primefac (talk) 00:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Not frequent enough disruptive editing to justify protection.--Slon02 (talk) 02:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP's - Persistent addition of unsourced content. Iknow23 (talk) 21:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 02:07, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 02:10, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Renewed edit war over the mountain's names. Consensus on the talk page appeared to settle on Denali (also known as Mount McKinley), but the renewed dispute has led to editors repeatedly changing it to Denali (previously known as Mount McKinley) and other editors reverting it. clpo13(talk) 01:34, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 02:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I'm afraid it's being vandalised by numerous IPs again. I have no idea why, seeing as it receives the least amount of traffic in the Banjo-Kazooie series. JAGUAR  19:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @Jaguar: I'm a little reluctant to protect as there were significant contributions by an IP recently. NeilN talk to me 20:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah it's OK, I think the net of positive contributions from IPs lately have been even so far. As long as the troublemaker IP is blocked, then it should be fine to leave it unprotected. If it gets vandalised more frequently, I'll put in another request. JAGUAR  21:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. '''tAD''' (talk) 21:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:50, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Ensure restoration of last stable version (15:35, 24 September 2015), per WP:NOCON, and protect from persistent edit-warring. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 22:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:57, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Not seeing any reason for full protection of this page. Should be unprotected so image deletion notices, etc. can be left. Even though Ryulong is banned, others can act on any notices left on his page. Kelly hi! 12:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. Ryulong doesn't want to, and there is no reason to. A banned user's talk page should not be used by others for coordination purposes. If you want to be notified about what happens to Ryulong's uploads, watchlist them.  · Salvidrim! ·  13:26, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

30 September 2015

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent non-constructive edits by IP editors.
60 days after the last spate of changes, 104.228.168.70 (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfa · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) shows up with the same editing pattern as

Question: @Useddenim: Is there an long-term abuse case for this? I see that there have been similar protection periods applied before, but some of these pages have not been edited in many moons. Also the edits from anonymous users have not been reverted, and otherwise appear constructive MusikAnimal talk 05:57, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WRT WP:LTA, probably, but given the pushback/apathy I received in the past, I thought this would be the easier path to follow. Where I can tell for certain I have made reverts, but in many cases the changes have been small and/or difficult to very if they are correct or not. My area of expertise is primarily with route diagrams; I can check the other transportation articles to a lesser degree, but as far as his other areas of interest (the Buffalo area, and television shows) I know little (and it seems that other editors don't care too much). I know that Allamericanbear was trying to clean up after this IP, but quit out of fustration. Useddenim (talk) 10:23, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging HJ Mitchell as he might be more familiar with this case MusikAnimal talk 19:46, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I vaguely remember this, but it was year ago. I'm not sure I can be of much use. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:35, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Going to go by the book with Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 17:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-vandalism of BLP-article. Huldra (talk) 20:48, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Addition of unsourced content and violation of WP:CRYSTAL is becoming out of hand, and with registered editors. Request full protection until after event is complete, or at least until more matches are officially announced. Lord Laitinen (talk) 20:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We will likely need to restore semi after that. In the meantime please use the talk page to discuss disputed content MusikAnimal talk 21:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iași International Airport (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent non-constructive IP edits (returning after previously protected sessions). Thank you, (Rgvis (talk) 12:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 19:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuing unsourced PoV pushing after last semi-protection expired. GermanJoe (talk) 12:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 19:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; being vandalized by similar IP addresses. Dan56 (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 19:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – dynamic ipv6 range intent on vandalising the page. Amortias (T)(C) 18:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 19:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as page protection was removed, vandalism recommenced. . Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:06, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:09, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:09, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent WP:sockpuppetry relating to the Landi family – please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/036386536a. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 19:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Advertising, already deleted twice today. shoy (reactions) 18:37, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NawlinWiki. NeilN talk to me 19:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same old thing. New school year, new spate of IP vandalism to this page. Legitimate edits are relatively rare. Please protect as previously; preferably longer. Hertz1888 (talk) 19:02, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC protected 14 months. NeilN talk to me 19:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent addition of improperly sourced content. ViperSnake151  Talk  02:39, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined In a perfect world, I'd love it if you were to approach the user in question on their talk page and see if you can't come to some sort of agreement or understanding that doesn't require page protection. Failing that, report through AIV so that we can keep the page unprotected, rather than protecting to deal with a single user. -Philippe (talk) 11:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly recreated talk page with no article. Avicennasis @ 07:55, 17 Tishrei 5776 / 07:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:06, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of original research without citing said-research with verifiable reliable sources. livelikemusic my talk page! 15:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:02, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from unregistered editors. . Robert McClenon (talk) 16:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent fancrufting, addition of promotional and unsourced. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:18, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Let's see if they lose interest.... -Philippe (talk) 11:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 03:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Pending changes doesn't seem to be slowing the rate of bad ip edits, a spate of semi may give them the idea. Amortias (T)(C) 05:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:34, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Either marketing company or fans continue to remove "Christian" from the band's article. The changes have been increasing lately. They are generally anons or new accounts so a long or indefinite lock should help prevent the changes. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 04:45, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: I think you must be involved in this. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 06:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 06:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 06:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing, numerous entries of persistent vandalism. Stephreef (talk) 08:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of sockpuppets of banned user Wikidawg11 as well as IP vandalism on BLP. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:58, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

create-protection: indefinite create protection. 112.79.35.207 (talk) 10:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection (or reduce to semi-protection): Page currently template-protected for page moves, but not protected for editing. When I asked the protecting admin if a different protection level was intended, the reply was I think I wanted to semiprotect from editing and misclicked. There is no activity since then, so I don't see a need for correction. [64]. Template-protection is only meant to be used for templates, modules, or other highly transcluded pages (per WP:TPROT) so it should at least be downgraded to semi, if not unprotected. Evad37 [talk] 09:12, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:51, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 09:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.--112.79.35.207 (talk) 10:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jevansen (talk) 00:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Slon02 (talk) 00:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP Vandalism related to blocked user VeritasVincitUSA. Recent changes to revert content here [[65]]. Original material insertion here [[66]]. Other IP's have added here [[67]] and here [[68]]. Admin verifying the IP as related to blocked user here [[69]] Springee (talk) 02:23, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Slon02 (talk) 02:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 06:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – I.P. vandal with a long history of disruptive edits continues to add unsourced info about current show that don't air on Sky 1. Digifan23 (talk) 21:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Digifan23, there's 1 IP, right? I blocked them for six months. NeilN talk to me 21:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – I.P. vandal with a long history of disruptive edits continues to add unsourced info about current show that don't air on Sky Living. Digifan23 (talk) 21:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 21:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since August 29, every edit has been Vandalism or the reversion of it. SMP0328. (talk) 02:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 02:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: There is a long standing consensus to use the word 'myth' in the lead section of this article. It has been challenged many times, and each time the challenge fell through. Despite this, and despite a comment embedded within the lead warning against doing so, it is regularly changed by IP and new editors. A handful of users, including (marginally) myself, and (more prominently) Isambard Kingdom have been reverting these changes, but to no long-term avail. I believe that permanently semi-protecting this page will solve the problem, or at the very least, reduce it to a more manageable level. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 17:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support: The article is frequently vandalized. Protection that requires a wiki-editor account to make change makes sense and would, I think, promote responsible editing of this important article. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article has been edited eight times this month, which isn't 'frequently' for protection purposes. KrakatoaKatie 18:59, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I understand your reasoning here. Would you mind expounding? My concern is that there have been 15 edits in September, out of which 10 were disruptive in this manner (or raw vandalism). That's 2/3 of all edits to the page. If one looks back to the prior 31 days, you get 16 out of 21 edits being disruptive, which is greater than 75% of all the edits. I understand that this isn't a heavily edited article compared to some others, but since there are no hard minimum numbers of disruptive edits given in the relevant policy, shouldn't the categorization of "heavy and persistent" be relative? From where I sit, greater than 3/4 of all edits being either disruptive or corrective of that disruption certainly qualifies as "heavy", and I don't think anyone doubts that it's persistent. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 20:06, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
While I won't overrule a decision of a fellow administrator, I do think both of you have valid points. It seems as though pending changes would actually be appropriate in this case, since the article isn't edited very frequently (and hence wouldn't be ideal for semiprotection), but most of the edits it does receive are disruptive (which would be filtered out through pending changes).--Slon02 (talk) 20:11, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I can do that. Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 01:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Greater level of protection needed: although pending changes is making it easier to counter the vandalism ultimately it's not deterring it. 86.132.206.228 (talk) 00:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 00:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 00:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 00:57, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 16:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. KrakatoaKatie 19:01, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:. Long ago, in the Template:Ethnicity in Louisiana, I included a parenthesis next to the word " Creoles" to placing in it to "Cajuns" and "Isleños in Louisiana," because both peoples are Louisiana Creole people. However, a anonymous user is removing this parenthesis. I put the parenthesis several times and the user removed it in all of them, without even indicate why eliminated the parenthesis in the summary editing. Even I indicated, in the talk page of the user, that he should not remove the brackets and that if he did that he should indicate why eliminated. The user not only did not answer, but he returned to remove the parenthesis that I put.--Isinbill (talk) 20:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully the IP starts to communicate. NeilN talk to me 21:35, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:58, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC extended to 1 year NeilN talk to me 23:10, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]