Talk:AlDub

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Attempt to delete the article contents

I searched this article and found out that it was empty; checking the history, I found out that some unsigned account deleted all the contents of AlDub. I tried to bring back the content as much as possible. Please help protect this article as this is open to any form of vandalism. Thanks. Geoffbits (talk) 13:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have now requested for the page to be protected. Chihciboy (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

Per WP:TRIVIA, please avoid creating lists of miscellaneous information (e.g. "Kalye's Angels", "Gasgas Abelgas" "Dora and Explorer"). Also, I don't see anything reasonable enough for these lists to be warranted for inclusion Chihciboy (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge AlDub with KalyeSerye

the rationale for merge proposal is because the concept and importance of AlDub cannot be separated out of context from KalyeSerye, the converse is also true: KalyeSerye CANNOT be discussed without AlDub because they are co-requisites, that is why a lot of duplicated material can be found in the two articles; KalyeSerye evolved out of the "Problem Solving" segment of Juan for All, All for Juan since AlDub became a phenomenon, with AlDub/KalyeSerye segment eventually replacing "Problem Solving" and all sources support this, can you find any article mentioning KalyeSerye without AlDub? or any article mentioning AlDub without KalyeSerye? that is impossible because they were born from the same womb at the same time and basically describing the same spontaneous phenomenon

therefore, AlDub deserves a prominent section in the KalyeSerye article (before the cast/characters) where both can be discussed with minimal duplication and repetition of the same material, I will be doing the integration of unique AlDub material and removing redundancies and maybe you can criticize later, this will be a very careful merge, I promise

—-— .:nimbosa:. (talk • contribs) 06:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I replied in the talk page of KalyeSerye. Chihciboy (talk) 14:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Chihciboy the discussion is not yet closed, this is a merge proposal and I have finished merging the contents to KalyeSerye article.. pending consensus, AlDub page will be a redirect to KalyeSerye page, but because you rejected this proposal that does not mean there is a unanimous decision in your favor, right now, we have one vote for the merge (me) and one vote against the merge (you), I am sorry if you were offended, but I was being BOLD when I did the merge just like when you create a page and maintain it without anyone's approval, it is always our own initiative on Wikipedia, and I only want to minimize the duplication and discussion of the same content on more than one article when we can discuss this as a distinct yet prominent portion / chapter / heading of another article that contains a more general discussion; now if you INSIST on consensus, you should seek consensus based on our arguments mentioned here, right now we're even.. ONE ALL —-— .:nimbosa:. (talk • contribs) 03:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I gave my opinion regarding the merging in the KalyeSerye's talk page. Please refer to it. Thanks. Geoffbits (talk) 09:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AlDub. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151105214822/http://www.pep.ph/news/pepalerts/1 to http://www.pep.ph/news/pepalerts/1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]