Talk:Kick (2014 film)

Kick (2014 film) was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 8, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. In addition, they should only briefly summarize the plot; detailed plot descriptions may constitute a derivative work. See Wikipedia's Copyright FAQ.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Shaddycrook (talk · contribs) has been paid by Digitrock. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Disclosed here

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Initial comments

Shaina first met Devi when she was trying to help her friend to elope with her lover to get married. Devi rescues them from goons and helps with the marriage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.100.87.148 (talk) 05:32, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

All Time Blockbuster film generally received positive reviews from critics, most of whom praised the performance of Salman Khan. Taran Adarsh ofBollywood Hungama gave it 4.5 out of 5 stars in his review and concluded, KICK is a paisa vasool, seeti-maar entertainer. Get ready for a Tsunami called KICK at the ticket window. It is sure to rewrite box-office records. Salman fans, rejoice. KICK is a sure-shot B-L-O-C-K-B-U-S-T-E-R. To quote a dialogue from the film: 'Woh apni Eidi lene zaroor aayega'. Komal Nahta said On the whole, Kick is a blockbuster of epic proportions! It entertains audiences of all kinds and classes. It is the kind of film which – to borrow from a dialogue mouthed by Salman Khan in the film – dil mein aati hai aur samajh mein bhi aati hai! With tremendous repeat value too, this one will shake the box-office, set cash registers ringing and ultimately emerge as one of the biggest blockbusters of Indian cinema. It could easily turn out to be the highest grosser of Salman’s career so far! KOIMOI mentioned Kick isn’t a pile-on, on Salman’s harebrained repertoire. Luckily, it has the thrill in its action parts and the fuzziness in its romantic ones. Salman sinks his teeth in a character that is a blend of his best roles, delivering a film that is a welcome change from his regular formulaic potboilers. Nawazuddin’s performance upped the bar of mainstream villain by manifolds and Jacqueline’s chemistry with Khan is sexy. Kick is no Ek Tha Tiger but it is an effectively enjoyable film that crackles enough to gives us bang for our buck! I am going with a generous 3/5. Raja Sen from rediff gave 3 stars and mentioned Kick is Salman's best film in a decade. In the world of harebrained Bhai films, Kick is the best made and the most fun. Kick, therefore, is the Dhoom 2 of the Salmaniverse. It looks good, moves fast, shows off its superstar. In the world of harebrained Bhai films -- Dabanng included -- Kick is the best made and the most fun. If you're a fan, you just hit the jackpot. Deccan Chronicle gave 3 stars and mentioned Seen purely in the context of its genre, Kick is an entertainer worth a couple of hours of your time on the weekend; more so if you seriously take to his dialogue 'dil main ata hoon, samajh main nahi'. The film is endearing in bits, but rational? We'll let you decide. Subhash k. Jha gave 4.5 stars and mentioned in his review “Kick toh banta hai, boss! The number of times the word ‘kick’ kicks into this heady cocktail of comedy and action, you’d think there’s no word in the dictionary that gives our hero a greater kick than…well, kick”. DNA newspaper gave 4 star mentioned in review “Kick is non-stop entertainment and Salman Khan at his best”. Zoom TV gave 3.5 stars these are small quibbles in a fun film. As Devi would say, "Dr. Psycho, chillati kaiko?" Just enjoy this cheese-Kick. Anupama Chopra from Hindustan Times gave the movie 2.5 out of 5.[32] Mohar Basu of Koimoi gave 3 stars out of 5 and noted that "Kick is no Ek Tha Tiger but it is an effectively enjoyable film that crackles enough to gives us bang for our buck!" [33] Rachit Gupta from Filmfare gave the movie 3 out of 5.[34] Shubha Shetty Saha from Mid Day gave the movie 2 out of 5.[35] Rajeev Masand from CNN-IBN gave the movie 2.5 out of 5. Glamsham gave 3 stars. Abhijitja (talk) 01:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - This is not a "spot the difference" competition.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to any article. - Arjayay (talk) 18:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

Rishabhgutgutia is trying to push his POV by removing positive reviews, and that without using any reliable sources. The good and the bad, both, should be there. That needs to stopped or the article will have to fully protected. Thanks. Fideliosr (talk) 09:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is true then I agree that all the positive and negative reviews must b there. Lets not forget that its wikipedia not a fan base site where one can do what he want for your favourite actor and leave negative impact of actors who you don´t like.201.220.215.11 (talk) 08:52, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deatle 171.50.145.128 (talk) 10:28, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Budget of the Film

I have noticed that the fogures of the Budget of the film has been changed several times. Please somone put the exact figures from a reliable source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.215.12 (talk) 08:53, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 11 August 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Sunil Pal as a drunkard at the party

61.12.7.236 (talk) 11:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 13:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 12 August 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add a space and capitalize "i" in this line-

"first four days at the box office.if Kick stays alive in second week then it will easily break Aamir Khan's Dhoom 3 record."

It's grammatical error. 101.63.105.35 (talk) 12:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done: I've removed the sentence, as we don't allow speculation like this in Wikipedia articles (see here for the policy). While I was at it, I also gave the entire section a copy edit. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 14:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 12 August 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

366.74 78.137.92.153 (talk) 14:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 14:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

unlock protected page

Please unlock the protected page Anita francis2504 (talk) 07:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. @Anita francis2504: you are welcome to propose specific changes here and someone who has the permission will handle it. But the article was suffering from a high level of vandalism and other unacceptable edits, making it hard for those who were trying to make valid edits get them accomplished either. DMacks (talk) 09:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 18 August 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The "Box office" section in the infobox should be updated. The same source (Koimoi.com) now says 374.50 crore. Therefore, please change:

gross = ₹354.24 crore (US$42 million) (Worldwide gross)

to

gross = {{INRConvert|374.50|c}} (Worldwide gross)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/kick-takes-4th-place-after-dhoom-3-chennai-exp-3-idiots-as-worldwide-grosser/|title=Kick Takes 4th Place, After Dhoom 3, Chennai Exp & 3 Idiots As Worldwide Grosser|publisher=Koimoi.com</ref>

Thanks.

Fideliosr (talk) 13:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The page's protection level and/or your user rights have changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 01:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 18 August 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

proposed sequel reports were coming that it will be a sequel for kick,but salman cleared that kick needs a script to make it once again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.96.184.43 (talk) 14:28, 18 August 2014‎

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 10 November 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

117.203.254.156 (talk) 12:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC) pls can i edit i hav the details abut the principal photoraphy of the film pls allow[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Final Worldwide Gross Of Kick

Box Office India has given the final worldwide gross of Kick. It's 355 crore. ^[1] Please update it. Thanks. Aryan.malik3 (talk) 07:30, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "What is the final worldwide gross of Kick?". Box Office India Trade Network. 12 November 2014.

Copy from Telgu movie

This movie is exact copy of Telgu movie Kick which is released in 2009. I inserted the fact on the page. Talk before removal with your arguments against this fact. I have seen both the movies. Searchpow (talk) 17:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kick (2014 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120117052827/http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/Angela-Jonsson-to-star-with-Salman-in-Kick/Article1-796473.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/Angela-Jonsson-to-star-with-Salman-in-Kick/Article1-796473.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "What is the final worldwide gross of Kick?". Box Office India Trade Network. 12 November 2014.

[1]