User talk:Gatordragon

Welcome!

Hello, Gatordragon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to List of Mighty Med episodes. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Amaury (talk) 15:45, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Kirby Buckets page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 17 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Miles from Tomorrowland page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign Air Dates

As has been previously mentioned, if the foreign airings of a show are notable enough then they should be added to the Broadcast section of the article or main article show of the show (if it's a show with two or more seasons that has a separate article for the episodes). The air dates on TV show articles should be the air dates of the show on its original channel. Amaury (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gravity Falls (season 2). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. nyuszika7h (talk) 22:18, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Viewers

We should only be using the viewers from an episode's original channel and original airing. Reruns are not counted, and even if they are simulcast, that is still not counted because we only include viewers from the original channel as mentioned. However, if you feel these should be included, please start a discussion on the relevant talk pages and reach a consensus. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Get Blake!

When you edited and improved the Get Blake! page, what country are those air dates from cause there seems to be duplicate episodes such as Get Boots! premiering in March 17, 2015 and September 9, 2015 which means that either the September or October premieres are fake or they premiered in another country. We can't have like the UK and Germany airdates at the same time. Nutshells4TheWin (talk) 8:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Get Blake!, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 00:06, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Get Blake!. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhD^v2.0 00:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fresh Beat Band of Spies

Hello, I am here to inform you that your recent edits to Fresh Beat Band of Spies were reverted because you purposefully made it seem as if the series never aired on Nickelodeon. The references we have on the page clearly show that it has aired on both Nickelodeon and Nick Jr., and since Nickelodeon was used for first-run premieres, that is its original channel. Squiddaddy (talk) 04:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to same page

Thank you so much for taking into account that Fresh Beat Band of Spies aired on Nickelodeon, too, but Nickelodeon is the main channel here and Nick Jr. is just another broadcaster. Therefore Nick Jr. should not be listed on the page anywhere except for in the Broadcast section. Squiddaddy (talk) 21:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Nickelodeon is the main channel no matter what, since it has aired on it and is the more well-known of the two. However, I will keep Nick Jr. under the original channel section; Nickelodeon is to be used in the first sentence. Nick Jr. can be mentioned in the broadcast section. The Nick Jr. name is in use for the Nickelodeon preschool programming block that it was part of for a few days, so simply saying Nickelodeon will allow for less confusion. Squiddaddy (talk) 21:46, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the series was said to be produced for Nickelodeon and not Nick Jr. in a press release: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140313005909/en/Nickelodeon-Debut-100-Episodes-Brand-New-Educational-Preschool#.VgsJcxNViko in 2014. Since there is conflicting information, it is best to go with Nickelodeon as it is stated on the most sources. Sorry if this is confusing! Squiddaddy (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for yet another point, but I would like to inform you that since the series is Canadian/American, the original channel in Canada counts as original channel too. This was Nickelodeon Canada (there is no Nick Jr. Canada), and since Nickelodeon is a worldwide broadcaster for it, it seems best to go with it. Squiddaddy (talk) 22:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Splits

See WP:SPLIT#How to properly split an article if that is what you are intending. Don't forget the required by wiki policy attributions required. See also WP:CWW. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the required attributions are somewhat automatic if you give complete descriptions of what you are doing and why in the edit summaries for the edits you make. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that not giving the required attributions when you copy content from one place to another on wiki is a violation of the licence terms and is a WP:COPYVIO. I don't understand your refusal to do the basically minor use of edit summaries required to explain where stuff is going and where it came from. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:48, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Nick Jr.. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Diff: [1] Even if you are correct, which I think you generally are in this edit, you cannot add your personal evaluations into Wikipedia. These analyses need to come from reliable published sources that have a reputation for fact-checking and a clear editorial oversight. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:04, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason to have US viewer counts for a Japanese TV show just because it's recently been broadcast in the US. Why are you so obsessed with children's television shows nielson ratings? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:140:8200:DE:955E:11:191:C546 (talk) 05:14, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minimus is Missing

Hi Gatordragon, regarding this edit at Sofia the First, if the episode number is 223, why did you put it in S3? Feel free to reply here. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second notice: Whatever references you have to support the position of "Minimus is Missing" in this edit, please bring to the article's talk page to discuss. We cannot have the article be disrupted by conflicting editors who refuse to discuss. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:21, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Little Charmers, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. If you have a reason for removing sources and changing details claimed to be in these sources, please explain it somewhere. McGeddon (talk) 21:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon, you may be blocked from editing. Your edit to the page seemed like you purposefully made it look like those shows never aired on Nick. You have been warned about this in the past. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 22:05, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gatordragon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]