Jump to content

Talk:Flitch beam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Where the article says "11.4 lbs for engineered wood vs. 25.2 lbs for flitch," should that be pounds per foot? --'Triskele Jim (talk) 20:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2018 and 14 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 3pedals. Peer reviewers: Wagram Qizhang Pimlico.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clarity

[edit]

Some points in the article are not clear to me:

  1. Under advantages, it lists "are much lighter than a steel beam of the same size". Surely this is irrelevant - what matters is the weight (and cost) of a steel beam of the same STRENGTH.
  2. Under advantages, it also lists "can still be attached (e.g. nailed) to the rest of a wooden structure". A steel beam can also be attached to a wooden structure, using bolts or proprietary connectors, so it seems this advantage is exaggarated.
  3. Given the two concerns above, it's not clear what advantage a flitch beam has over a steel beam.
  4. It states "two laminations of #2 SPF". What does SPF mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.85.79 (talk) 11:45, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]