User talk:Mahfuzur rahman shourov

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mahfuzur rahman shourov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Hanchos". The reason given for Hanchos's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Bbb23 (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: Already unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 23:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mahfuzur rahman shourov, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Mahfuzur rahman shourov!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:32, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Not sure why this change [1] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:21, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

to ensure a quicker attempt at getting that page edited to a higher quality standard.

Please do not do this [2]. This does not mean that more people will help improve the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

et

Please note

You have responses on my and Dmacks' talk pages. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Men in Black, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Government Agent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i messed up in the AFD process

admins please help clean it by deleting the project page or rearranging it or whatever they can.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits GSL

I am reverting your edits. Please see the Gun show loophole talk page before attempting further changes, and make sure to read through the information at the top regarding this article's current GA review, and the arbitration committee's permission to administrators regarding sanctions. Darknipples (talk) 22:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

Keep your warnings to yourself. Kⁿo_wl^ed_ge B^at_tl^e 16:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The way I observed it, you removed refs, and changed the language of the ref. If you want to fix references, that's fine. Kⁿo_wl^ed_ge B^at_tl^e 16:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages and warning messages

If someone deletes a warning messages that you added to their talk page, please don't undelete it or re-add the warning. Deleting a warning is taken as the user has read the warning messages. Your undelete here can be taken as disruptive editing. You've left the warning, they have read it and deleted it. Let it end there. See WP:REMOVED. Ravensfire (talk) 17:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Avijit Roy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Giant Snowman 19:25, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Avijit Roy, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Giant Snowman 15:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Avijit Roy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MarnetteD|Talk 16:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Avijit Roy. - You have received numerous previous warnings. Please be more careful with your edits. If you do not understand English, please stick to editing the Wikipedia in your own language. - David Biddulph (talk) 16:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:09, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 18:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Classless Inter-Domain Routing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Subnet and Router. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft moved

I moved your draft from main space to Draft:List of The Centurions episodes. When you think it's ready, feel free to submit it for review. Thanks. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 06:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of The Centurions episodes (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JMHamo was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of The Centurions episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JMHamo (talk) 19:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Your addition to Draft:List of The Centurions episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Anti Terrorism Raju Memorial Sculpture

By policy, proposed deletion may only be used against an article a single time. Anti Terrorism Raju Memorial Sculpture was proposed for deletion on 2015-05-21 by DGG and was deproded on 2015-05-26 by Christian75. So it may not be proposed for deletion again. It may only be deleted if it satisfies one of the criteria for speedy deletion, or through a deletion discussion. You started the latter process on 2015-10-06, but did not complete it, so the discussion was closed with no action.

A more productive approach to this article would be to merge it with University of Dhaka, where the well sourced paragraph about the sculpture could become a new "Public art" subsection of "Campus". A full-content paste merger could be performed boldly, by following the steps at WP:PROMERGE. Worldbruce (talk) 18:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on The Centurions (TV series). Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were adding information that is called "fancruft"; that is, it's important only to fans and not necessary for an encyclopedia. It's extensive original research of fiction. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sildenafil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CGMP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OP curious

Always be curious? OP curious - Supdiop (T🔹C) 15:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2015 October 19. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Editing an archive file in order to ping other editors is considered disruptive. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pages containing Anatomical terms

Before you created Category:Pages containing Anatomical terms, you clearly did not check for existing categories on that topic, such as Category:Anatomy and its many subcategories. Consequently, your new category adds no value, and will be deleted. Please be more careful, and stop making extra work for yourself and others. Given your history of disruptive edits, we are not inclined to take your bad edits as mistakes—and continued disruption will get you blocked for ever-longer stretches. —Swpb^talk 20:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

disruptive editting

I see from your talk page history you are not unaware of the often problematic nature of your editting. So, formally, be made aware of the discussion here of your editting the reference desk archives. Further disruption will be reported as possible sockpuppetry Alex Sazonov if justified and for administrative action without warning. μηδείς (talk) 20:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MRS - I don't care who you are or how you write. Just try to give references when you reply to questions at the ref desk, and don't try to stir up trouble with other users. Some people don't like to be pinged, while others appreciate it. The archives are usually not edited, but it is OK to do so if you have a good reason, like a new ref or something. If you want to talk to another user about an old question, you can also post at their talk page, though some of them may not want to discuss. Good luck :) SemanticMantis (talk) 23:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 05:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mahfuzur rahman shourov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i not do disruptive edit alltime, check contrib on terminator 2, end of days film, halo reach. yes me make mistake but not reason for indef block.i also notify ruleviolation like un-rs link on rakkhi bahini page, wp filehost user so on

Decline reason:

Per WP:CIR. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mahfuzur rahman shourov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

just cause use terse talk not mean incompetent, typing difficulty with wording not mean i sock or incompetent, CIR say no WP:BRICKS Mahfuzur rahman shourov (talk) 16:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It means exactly that; if you are unable to create a sensible, grammatical and coherent sentence requesting unblock then competence policy is very much involved.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WP:NOBRICKS doesn't say anything about unblocking editors who are not capable of putting together a coherent sentence in English. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mahfuzur rahman shourov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

contrib history, terminator 2 page, halo reach page, more https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=20160101000000&limit=500&tagfilter=&contribs=user&target=Mahfuzur+rahman+shourov&namespace=0 show if incompetent, mistake in avijit roy page understood past, understood mistake, OP only want ask que refdeskMahfuzur rahman shourov (talk) 06:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Listing your contributions is irrelevant. Please demonstrate, in your next unblock request, if you make one, that you are both willing and able to construct a complete, meaningful sentence in English. Further terse requests will only reinforce our opinion that competence is an issue here.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mahfuzur rahman shourov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

contrib very relevant, show english ability. if unblock, user try avoid articlespace, only ask que refdesk, user curious, why post ques ref

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, this is nowhere the level of English required to do even very basic contributions here. I've revoked your talk page access because this isn't getting anywhere. Max Semenik (talk) 08:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mahfuzur rahman shourov (talk) 06:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mahfuzur rahman shourov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

contrary to what the admins who blocked me thinks, this person does not have competency issues regarding the use of english language, which is evidenced by the contrib log of user in article space, as in, every edits made to wikipedia articles. other than the problem regarding cite book syntax usage in avijit roy page, other edits were CONTRARY to the signs of "broken english". but the problem actually started when after adding a new reply on an old question on refdesk archive, i the user was accused of being a sockpuppet of an unrelated person and was actually threatened that i will be mislabeled as that sock user. after posting this at WP:ANI with hopes that the admins in noticeboard will actually look into my contrib log and realize that the claims of incompetence are untrue and that my use of terse talk is only in specific areas where it is not of detrimental risk to wikipedia, example: talk page, refdesk. instead one admin blocked me saying that blocking me indefinitely thinking i am incompetent is "good faith" and that i should be happy because that admin did not assume bad faith, which according to that admin is "trolling". then i decide to post unblock requests in talk page, where i decided to directly link to my edits in article space, showing the number of characters, syntaxes added as well as my usage of semantics, in an effort to prove my "brokenness(!)" of language. this is a summary of the incident in my POV. for more neutral analysis, i am putting the related links https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Reference_desk/Archive_119#Editing_the_archives https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive903#not_know_how_describe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mahfuzur_rahman_shourov

Decline reason:

You seem unwilling or unable to communicate in normal English. I'm revoking talk page access. PhilKnight (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've looked through your contributions, and what I feel is the issue here are three things:

Your editing at the reference desk
Mass pings
Mobile device editing

Could you please inform us what you would do to resolve these issues? -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Requests

I am not an administrator, and cannot respond to your unblock requests. However, I would very strongly advise you that your next unblock request be one or two sentences in good syntactical and grammatical English. You have been blocked for two reasons. First, some of your edits were just generally disruptive, such as pinging other editors by editing an archive. However, second, this is the English Wikipedia, and you don't seem to be able to edit in English. If you want to be unblocked, please demonstrate that you can edit in English. Otherwise your talk page may also be blocked. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note to reviewing admins

I've re-allowed talkpage access for this user so that they may demonstrate their competence here. User says he was making above requests on a device on which typing was difficult. — foxj 16:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Let me get this straight; in the declined unblock request on November 7th from Anthony Bradbury, he requests that you "...Please demonstrate, in your next unblock request, if you make one, that you are both willing and able to construct a complete, meaningful sentence in English. Further terse requests will only reinforce our opinion that competence is an issue here." You decided that it was a good idea to respond with "contrib very relevant, show english ability. if unblock, user try avoid articlespace, only ask que refdesk, user curious, why post ques ref"? Now I'm wondering if you are just trolling us. Abbreviating words or missing some punctuation/capitalization here and there isn't a big deal, but flooding ref desks with caveman-speak questions [3] [4] [5] [6] is disruptive. (Most of these questions could be resolved much more quickly and easily with a simple Google search). Yes, it is more challenging to type on a mobile device, but if you can't be bothered to try a little harder, I see little point in unblocking you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: having just read this old ANI thread, now I'm nearly certain you are just wasting our time. Suggesting that talk page access be re-revoked and WP:DENY be resumed for this. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of The Centurions episodes

Hello, Mahfuzur rahman shourov. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of The Centurions episodes".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 02:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mahfuzur rahman shourov. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:User antipsychiatrysideeffect

Template:User antipsychiatrysideeffect, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User antipsychiatrysideeffect and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User antipsychiatrysideeffect during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sundostund (talk) 13:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]