User talk:Calicutspecialist

Calicutspecialist, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Calicutspecialist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Parvathy Nair

Your addition to Parvathy Nair has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:34, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Parvathy Nair red.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Parvathy Nair red.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Vensatry _(ping) 15:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Parvathy Nair. You have been repeatedly removing SOURCED content from her page, without proper explanation. That surely warrants warnings! Do not remove the films from her page! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some clarification! Suggestion Suggestion

1) My account is being used only for promotional purposes? Have you gone through my contributions first? Do you know what promotional purposes means?
2) How am I degrading an actress by adding a film she WAS part of to her filmography? Logic much? It's absolutely irrelevant in how many scenes she appeared in that film, she was there and she was also credited, that's what matters, ergo it belongs into a filmography. You can't choose which films to add in her filmography and which not. You don't own her site! Every other editor is going to add that anyway.
3) No, no other editor is against it, you're the only one repeatedly removing the films!
4) You're not an admin!
5) You can't report me to admins before warning me CORRECTLY!
6) Talk to me first, before you try to report me!
7) Apply common sense dude!

Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 18:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Josu4u (talk) 14:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Parvathy Nair

Hi, I am incredibly confused as to why you continue to remove Parvathy's work. If you are a so-called fan, I assure you her work in those films were pretty good. If you were only "removing guest appearances", you may as well go ahead and remove half her work - including Uttama Villain - considering how little her screen time was. There's little we can do to improve the article, if you keep on removing some key information. Therefore, I request you to stop making such changes - I'm sure everyone else who looks up Parvathy - including the actress herself - would like to see a comprehensive list of films. Thanks. Editor 2050 (talk) 02:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - Wikipedia does not work like that. Now tell me. Would it be acceptable if I remove Kuselan or Ra.One from Rajini's filmography or English Vinglish from Ajith/Amitabh Bachchan's filmography? No, right? The list needs to be as comprehensive as possible. Plus, it clearly says "guest appearance". Furthermore. Nimirndhu Nil is a prestigious project - I don't see why she would deny it. Editor 2050 (talk) 03:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Stop removing those films. Nirmindhu Nil and it's Telugu version are prestigious projects, and she played the lead role in Dolls. We have spoken about this before. Editor 2050 (talk) 14:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Editor 2050 (talk) 16:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Who are you to implement your own ideas to a standard Wikipedia filmography? If that's the case, I suggest you go about removing all cameo/guest appearances from films from all actors. Sigh, you won't will you? Editor 2050 (talk) 15:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing films is certainly not improving it. Look at Angelina Jolie, Kajal Aggarwal, Vikram etc. These are good articles - and having a complete filmography is essential. Editor 2050 (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parvathy Nair

You appear to be edit warring at this article. Disruptive editing can get you blocked by WP:Administrators. Please take it to the article talk page. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:22, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]