User talk:Veera Dheera Sooran

Welcome

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ramesh Aravind filmography may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Veera Dheera Sooran, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Veera Dheera Sooran! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject IPL

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Indian Premier League, an collaborative group which aims to support development of Indian Premier League related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Joining us helps to improve the quality of Indian Premier League-related articles which are not in a good condition. I hope that you won't dismiss this request. We trust you, Veera Dheera Sooran, and we know that you have a lot of interest in this area. So why wait? Join fast! Thanks, and happy editing!

Hi Veera

I appreciate your good work. I'd like to give you a hint on how to provide references properly without showing only bare URLs. You can add citations by clicking in your editbox on "Cite" and then choose one of those templates and fill the info there. If you need help don't hesitate to contact me.-- Dravidian Hero 17:37, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Rasputin (2013 film), has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Rasputin (2013 film)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rituparna Sengupta may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to SIM (film)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to SIM (film) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you! bender235 (talk) 11:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thala 53

Is Aarambam the official title of the film? I can't find any source as yet. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thuppakki

I think there is some mess in the overseas box office section of Thuppakki. Can you please find it and fix? If yes, unsourced claims must be removed. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vadacurry

The piping was used to make the credits appear as it appears in the poster.

And when you cite reference, may I suggest you to provide titles and publishers etc? Coz The Times of India and The New Indian Express are not not just another entertainment portals. Its more than just that and I believe it adds weight-age to the reliability of the source.

Thank You. -- Sriram Vikram (talk) 12:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

At least some of this edit appears copy pasted from here and here.

Yours: "... Miss Uganda 2013 first runner up, Anita Kyalimpa, made her debut acting role in the film as the murdered daughter of an outspoken city mayor (played by Ebonies’ John Bagenda) while veteran Ugawood star, Micheal Wawuyo, played head of military intelligence. Typecast actor and real life cop, Wilberforce Mutete, maintained his day job in the film. Miss Uganda organiser Brenda Nanyonjo and Tricksters star, Carlos Ombonya, were also part of the cast...."'

Source: "...Miss Uganda 2013 first runner up, Anita Kyalimpa, makes her debut acting role in the film as the murdered daughter of an outspoken city mayor (played by Ebonies’ John Bagenda) while veteran Ugawood star, Micheal Wawuyo, plays head of military intelligence. Typecast actor and real life cop, Wilberforce Mutete, maintains his day job. Miss Uganda organiser Brenda Nanyonjo and Tricksters star, Carlos Ombonya, are also part of the predominant Ugandan cast..."'[1]

Could you please explain? Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More

At least some of this edit appears copy pasted from here. ("...1991 when, disillusioned with the slow progress his career was making, he decided to produce, direct and act in Sevagan, which went on to become a box office succes..."') Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At least some of this edit appears copy pasted from here. ("...with only his close associates like writer Prabanjan, artist Trotsky Maruthu , producer Mrs. Kameela Nasser, Actor Selvah and many others from the literary world attending the ceremony..."') Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At least some of this edit appears copy pasted from here. ("...Chaubey, who was initially slated to start shooting for the ...requested producer Vishal Bhardwaj to postpone the dates of filming even further...."') Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arjun Sarja

You are mistaken in your edit summary: "you can't remove a reliable source! I have rewritten it and this is fair now" This isn't about reliable sources. You didn't rewrite it. It still is verbatim "...he decided to produce, direct and act in Sevagan, which went on to become a box office success..."[2]

Now, please leave it out or rewrite it so it's completely different. Not close paraphrased, but completely different. I really don't think you understand yet that copyright violations are not allowed. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India invitation

Namaste! Veera Dheera Sooran,

Behalf of WikiProject India I am inviting you to join our WikiProject. To see what is happening now in WikiProject India, follow our noticeboard. If you are not a member already, you can add your name here. If are already a member, disregard this message. Thank you. -- Tito☸Dutta 22:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC). [reply]

If you have any question or comment you can post at my talk page clicking here. Best --Tito☸Dutta 22:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

I wasn't trying to be mean. I'm sorry if I upset you.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake

I made a mistake regarding copyright violation at articles that you are contributing to. I apologise for the error and hope that my mistake doesn't discourage you from contributing further. Best wishes Flat Out let's discuss it 08:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anu Hasan

If you notice persistent vandalism like you did in Anu Hasan, please request for appropriate protection at WP:RPP instead of engaging in edit-war. You might have already known about WP:3RR, if not its a good read. I have requested WP:Pending Changes for the article. Thanks! Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand. Try requesting Pending Changes for articles that are not actively edited. Anu Hasan is now protected with PC. For others, we just have to live with it :( Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:53, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

Hey, thank you so much for you contributions, please consider filling the edit summary after editing a page. It'll be easier for others what changes you have made. Thanks -- L o g X 20:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Divya - Soundar

What do you think of yourself..? Removing my Identity is not up to you, Ok. Thank you for your edits.... Some one has even removed my signature.., So I used the space available, OK. My MObile NO: 9944536318. Call me.... --Soundar.105 (talk) 02:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.216.99.135 (talk) 02:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. See this too....

File:Screen shot me.jpg.png

OK

What's her Date Of Birth.....? I have given a reference..... Prove me wrong... Change..... Delete....... This is not improvement.. & nice name ya. Don't say MERELY... I'm the base of all in this chapter..

I accept you....The question is .... Do You.......? I'm a simple Human eager to show myself........& to be acknowledged........ Does this disturb you.? Your name doesn't scare me. I too can........MERELY , OK. I'm a student.., So if you want to phone me , do it in the evening.....OK ! Thank You !!! --Soundar.105 (talk) 13:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What about the word MERELY..! Ok. I thought you would understand if I do it in phrases, Sorry. If you have did the significant work, then give the D.O.B. And tell me all your inputs are from reliable sources. Thank You ! Soundar.105 (talk) 14:14, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arrambam CD cover.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arrambam CD cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For creating the article Arrambam (soundtrack) and developing it fast. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Your last edit to Niveda Thomas has been revert, because you added complex table, So i request you please first read WP:MOSTABLE policy.

Thank you! Chander|For|You 07:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 20:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Nazriya Nazim Edit summary

Regarding your edit summary of the article "the sources are below in the main sections. that is just the introduction text and a summary of the article and does not need to be sourced!".

According to my knowledge the lead must conform to verifiability and other policies. Even though the presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article but some material, including direct quotations and contentious material about living persons, must be provided with an inline citation every time it is mentioned, regardless of the level of generality or the location of the statement. Source :Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section

But I have never read a Wikipedia Policy or a manual with quote "the introduction text and a summary of the article and does not need to be sourced!" . Please reply if there is one. KAS^(talk) 03:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

VDS

Haha, obviously. But, it will be better to add a upcoming film with a source. Or else some other editors who are not familiar with Tamil film industry might challenge to do so. Sorry if i interuppted you! -- L o g X 21:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Dis)Encouragement of trivia

converting the column from something specific and non trivial "Awards" to the non-specific "Notes" give the impression that anyone should add any random trivial comments that they want.

A project that has not completed is not yet a "Film" to include in the "Filmography" - which is the list of films , not "works in progress that may or may not end up being completed as films". The not-yet-complete status requires context and is therefore better and appropriately covered as text in the body of the article. Duplicating coverage of something that is not (and may not ever be) done is giving it too much weight. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you actually read the policy.

WP:BALASPS "An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and impartial, but still disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic. This is a concern especially in relation to recent events that may be in the news. Note that undue weight can be given in several ways, including, but not limited to, depth of detail, quantity of text, prominence of placement, and juxtaposition of statements." The coverage of a not yet completed film should NOT be given the same weight as an actually completed project.
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Tables Tables "can be useful for a variety of content presentations on Wikipedia, though should be used only when appropriate; sometimes the information in a table may be better presented as prose paragraphs"
- Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Tables#Captions_and_headings "column/row headings should be succinct and self-explanatory." Notes is non-self explanatory except to be open to all kinds of trivia
- Wikipedia:WHENTABLE#Appropriate "Prose is preferred in articles as prose allows the presentation of detail and clarification of context, in a way that a table may not. Prose flows, like one person speaking to another, and is best suited to articles, because their purpose is to explain. ... In an article, significant items should normally be mentioned naturally within the text rather than merely tabulated."

What policies are you basing your position on? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMOGRAPHY "The notes field should not be allowed to get overly cluttered." "Notes: This field is to include optional, additional information such as medium, episode titles, or awards--when there is no separate "Awards" section in the given article." - no where in the guidance does it say Notes should be used for upcoming not completed projects. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

explicit prohibition of upcoming not completed films is not needed. the guidelines do not explicitly prohibit including ticket prices and theater showtimes, but they are not allowed either. I have provided half a dozen policies and guidelines that each individually and particularly collectively together show that it should not be included. You have not provided anything from policy or guidelines to support your position at all.

Note that further conversation should take place on the article talk page in the discussion I have begun there. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what has the ticket price got to do with the actor? Lol. No, an explicit prohibition is needed, else I will add it, simply because it has been the norm. You have provided a whole lot of stuff that has become totally irrelevant, after I showed you WP:FILMOGRAPHY. I have provided what I needed to provide, now it's your turn. I'm waiting. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 14:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thank you very much for expanding RJ Balaji. The article would have nearly been deleted, as admins would have thought he is just a regular RJ. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 13:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Balaji is certainly one of the most popular RJs and amongst the most notable personalities in Tamil Nadu. He deserves an article :) Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 14:08, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Tresa Wiki Page

Hi,

We are a team of Catherine Tresa and the information provided by us in her wiki page is fully authenticated by her. Please do not make any changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guruvara (talk • contribs) 15:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RJ Dheena

Hi, good work expanding RJ Ophelia. In case u r creating an article on RJ Dheena, I found these sources u could use:

A page you started (Scarlett Mellish Wilson) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Scarlett Mellish Wilson, Veera Dheera Sooran!

Wikipedia editor Tritario just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice job with this! One thing though, I would recommend adding a picture of the person described in this page.

To reply, leave a comment on Tritario's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mullum Malarum

I am planning to take the article to GA status. Pls have a look at it; any suggestions for improvement? ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 06:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uravugal thodarkathai

Hi brother. Even-though it is a dubbed version, the name of the characters and the channel which telecasts changes. And, to add some strength to my opinion, I have added many more things about the show in this article, which has not been described in the original version of the page. And moreover, is there any rule that 'a dubbed movie/show should not have its respective article'?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragavendaragul (talk • contribs) 13:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Tamil films of 2013

Hey dude! In this list, the section 'July-December' has been repeated. Since I don't wanna mess up the references (the 1st list has 28-55 and 2nd list has 28-66) I'm gonna ask you to take care of it. Thanks -- Sriram ^{speak up} 02:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Naveena Saraswathi Sabatham

Hi in case u r editing it, I found much useful content in today's Chennai Times, page 11. U can view it in epaper mode. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 05:49, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOS/TABLE

The overall style guideline for tables "[Tables] can be useful for a variety of content presentations on Wikipedia, though should be used only when appropriate; sometimes the information in a table may be better presented as prose paragraphs or as an embedded list." ... "If a list is simple, it is generally better to use one of the standard Wikipedia list formats instead of a table. Lists are easier to maintain than tables, and are often easier to read."

"Some filmographies are presented in a tabled format; however, you should make sure there is an obvious benefit to table format before creating a table for a filmography. Adding a table so that there can be "notes" column that pulls in trivial crap like "child artiste" is just WP:BEANS and instead of being an obvious benefit is an obvious detriment. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:48, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to sort! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please

I know the Red Pen of Doom is acting a bit crazy of late bcos he wants every article to exactly follow MOS, and may even remove important sections in the process. But I request u not to badmouth him bcos he may retaliate violently, and that may lead to either of u getting blocked. Instead u can report him to any admin. Since u r one of the few most active users editing articles on Kollywood, I would not like to see u getting blocked for a silly reason. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 18:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You know me

Hai. you are the one who edited Uravugal thodarkathai recently and forwarded the page to yeh rishta kya kehlata hai. Since the person whom you are talking about above disturbs me alot in updating the page, I need to complaint about him to someone. Those things which I add in that page, were deleted for no reason. I undid his version and so to show his power, that guy blocked me for 1 day. What can I do to stop that empty headed guy? He doesn't even know a single word about that show but he knows to edit the plot of it. If I don't have any chance to overrule that guy, I will end up from wikipedia by using the ugliest words on his talk page. waiting for your advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.221.232.138 (talk) 10:32, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. He probably has no idea of the show, but the reason he has given was that the additions you made were unsourced. I see that it's mainly the "Awards and nominations" sections that you have worked on. I know you must have spent a lot of time on that and while it's unfortunate that it's being removed, I have to say, that it doesn't have a single source. If you can add some references, reliable sources, then nobody can remove it. I will try to look into it too. But keep calm and be patient please. Don't do something silly and get blocked indefinitely. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 18:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sridevi filmography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Tamil films of 2013

I'm puzzled. You've deleted Malini 22 Palayamkottai, Rummy, and Velmurugan Borewells again, with the edit summary "Sorry, those 3 films didn't release, check the source update for releases of 27 December please". But the reference lists all three of them with December release dates. So why have you removed them please? Thanks, Ruby Murray 15:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Bright Year Ahead

	A Bright Year Ahead
	Wishing you a happy new year 2014! Let the new year be bright and positive for us editors! -- Kailash29792 (talk) 06:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anjaan (film)

Do you have a reference that this is the film's actual title? If so, please add it to the article. If not, please undo the move immediately. DMacks (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added now, takes some time till sources are available. You can trust me. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 18:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt fix! Unfortunately, due to a long-term problem with rumor-mongering across many Indian/Tamil movie and actor pages, we really cannot wait for these sorts of refs. DMacks (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (7th Day (film)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 7th Day (film), Veera Dheera Sooran!

Wikipedia editor Missionedit just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Missionedit's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

X (upcoming film)

I am impressed. Good work. Keep it up! – Soham (talk) 09:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Poovarasam Peepee

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Poovarasam Peepee, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Prof. Mc (talk) 13:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Poovarasam Peepee

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Poovarasam Peepee, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Prof. Mc (talk) 13:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Poovarasam Peepee

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Poovarasam Peepee should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poovarasam Peepee .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Prof. Mc (talk) 14:01, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clearup

Vishnuvardhan (actor) by --Sunuraju (talk) 11:56, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 9 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Meera Nandan page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 3 (2012 Indian film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

"]. ''[[The Gulf Today]]''. 23 October 2012. Retrieved 11 November 2012.</ref> This Kolaveri Di")

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kaththi

The comment you wrote while editing, "And Anirudh is saying every album is his best!" LMAO bro. Nice one there. Thx :D Ssven2 (User talk:Ssven2)

Anjaan

Would Anjaan make it to GA articles? Ssven2 (User talk:Ssven2)

(talk page stalker) Yes it has the potential, but it needs to be expanded with more content, have a better prose, have a complete plot, and must have ended its theatrical run (that is when the box office collections are stable). Kailash29792 (talk) 12:32, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it surely can. As Kailash said, it has the potential. The content is there and a lot more can be added easily, but it needs massive copyediting. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:54, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

VIP

Bro, u wanna help make VIP (Velaiyilla Pattathari) a GA? :D. Ssven2 (talk)

Thx 4 trimming d plot, bro :D. U can make it as big as Gemini's plot, maybe. Ssven2 (talk)

If that's the case, then I'd better listen to you, bro. :D Thx again and continue to help me. Ssven2 (talk)

Done as per u mentioned. Removed the "casting" section and put it in the "cast" section. The page does look better ha ha :D. Kailash29792 added the editor's name as per Wikipedia:FILMCAST. Ssven2 (talk)

Ada pavi. "Look at the infobox" haha nice one. :D. Ssven2 (talk)

A kitten for you!

Now that you explained to me about the editor, I understand your reason behind the removal of his name from the "Top" section. :D

Ssven2 (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Content requires appropriate sourcing

Please stop reinserting content without providing inline citations to reliably published sources that verify the claims made as you are required to by policy. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:56, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed content for which you had not provided an inline citation to a reliably published source which verified the claim made in the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:47, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit [3] for example reintroduces the POV commentary. It reenters multiple awards for which there is no inline citation, it reintroduces multiple awards for which you have sources that dont meet our reliably published source standards and it reintroduces claims about the status of upcoming film projects where the source only states that an upcoming film project has been announced. Revert your edit now.

In addition your claim of ", DON'T you undo my edits with one click!!!" is incorrect, there were multiple removals done with careful edit summaries explaining why.

Revert yourself or provide the necessary sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:55, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nayantara. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amortias (T)(C) 19:32, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about your edits at WP:AN3

Do you want to reply to WP:AN3#User:Veera Dheera Sooran and User:TheRedPenOfDoom reported by User:Amortias (Result: )? It is a claim of edit warring at Nayantara. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:19, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Ok, bro and thanks . BTW most of them are IP editors who write unwanted things, therefore are not valid. So, their edits are reverted. (Ssven2 - talk)

October 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Bobby Simha, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 20:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

False warnings

re your message [4] you should actually look and see that there were in fact policy based reasons for the removal

meaningless hogdoodle even if sourced has no place. WP:TRIVIA / WP:ONUS.

Please read WP:ONUS, simply having a source does not guarantee that the material is appropriate for the article or that a meaningless flapdoodle version of the contents from a source are appropriate. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the centralized discussion at Talk:Bobby_Simha#Descriptions -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjjanaa

I'm not going to protect that page right now. However, unless a more reliable source can be found her birthday should be left out. Pleas discuss this at Talk:Sanjjanaa#DOB. There are problems with Twitter as a source. The account does not have the blue checkmark that is associated with a verified account. Compare that with Stephen Fry. It could be Sanjjanaa or it could be someone posing as her. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it is actually her but you're probably right, then we should remove it altogether. On the other hand, this User:Truesideofyou has been adding/changing the date of birth on several pages without adding any reference or adding very poor sources. Just wanted to bring it your knowledge. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage

I think its high time you start clearing your talkpage of finished discussions, maybe you could even archive them. And did you know that newcomer Ssven (actually, he's only been here since the last year) has already made quite a few GA's over here? Not bad for a newcomer. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I should but too lazy to do that. Mostly I have these Disambiguation link notifications on my page, I will clean them up some day. And that's great. He learns fast, I was expecting him to make some good contributions. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, bro. I have nominated Imsai Arasan 23am Pulikesi and Puthiya Paravai for GA. Moondram Pirai is due to be copyedited at the GOCE requests page, and I am currently expanding Padayappa.

—Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 15:56, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For your contributions which help made VIP a GA. —Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 15:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!!

Hello Veera Dheera Sooran, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015.
Happy editing,
—Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 04:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Thank you for the wishes and congratulations on your successive GA successes, way to go! Btw, regarding VIP, I came across this article, which explicitly states the budget and gross figures of the film. It may be a better source than the one currently in VIP's page. Have a look at it and decide yourself! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:37, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Puthiya Paravai

My nomination of the film for GA has passed. This is the fifth Sivaji Ganesan film to get GA status! —Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 04:21, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

	Have a bright year ahead!
	Do hope to see you contribute to at least a few GAs this time. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year! All I can say is that I'll contribute wherever whenever I can. :) Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 13:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nakshatra (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Carmel College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enthiran - First Superstar FA!

Great news! Enthiran is promoted! My first FA success! Hooray! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some facts

Although Jai's role in Raja Rani was indeed a supporting one, he yet got the second billing in the credits. And we list according to the credits. We should also refrain from adding rumours here as per WP:RUMOUR. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, is it? Didn't know that. I usually check the credits first before I make changes, didn't check this one though. Very silly this is. And where did I add rumours?? I am, in fact, removing all rumours added by fanboys. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 12:50, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yennai Arindhaal still has many rumours which need deleting. And I don't think Amy Jackson was ever considered for it. The source mentions only Trisha. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:05, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh oops. I was just undoing the edit by a fanboy, didn't check the source. I can't go through the whole article and all links and check whether everything is true. I reverted back to the last good version, so I assumed it would be true. Sorry about that. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 13:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16 Vayathinile

16 Vayathinile, which you had expanded once upon a time, has now passed its GA review. I thank you for those edits. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, went through the article, it's superbly written. I don't think I have contributed much to it, it's now a totally different (and far far better) article. Congrats to you and the main contributor, excellent job! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 13:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. :-) Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 01:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pathala Bhairavi

Pathala Bhairavi turns a GA! Excluding Kalidas (1931), Pathala Bhairavi is the second non-21st century Telugu film to become a GA after Mayabazar, both being my GAs. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Missamma

Hi. I'm here with a small request. That is, can you please translate the Tamil language references available here and add them at the article, which i am trying to take it to GA status? Please help me. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:29, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hey, sorry for the late response, I was absent for a week. I don't know if you still require my help. I glanced through the articles, they are quite long and I'm not sure whether I can spend enough time to fully translate them. If nobody else is willing to translate the texts I can do that but you would have to wait for some time. In any case, all the best! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 16:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done with it, bro! All the article requires now is a thorough copy-edit for grammar, style, cohesion, tone and/or spelling. Currently the gates for GOCE are closed and i placed the c/e tag on the top upon Baffle gab1978's suggestion. Can you c/e the article? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will have a look at it. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, have done some editing. I have not seen the film and I felt the plot was hard to comprehend. Some context is missing and some clairification is needed. I have made some notes and hidden the text, so please have a look. I tried my best but I think it would be good if other editors could also go through the article and help improve it. Again all the best! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the c/e. I've resolved those hidden comments just now. Now i believe the plot is better and clean. And, surely i shall ask another editors to give a c/e upon your suggestion.

Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:45, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Sri Divya page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radhika Apte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lion (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Parvathy Nair. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Calicutspecialist (talk) 01:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception of Paayum Puli (2015 film)

Hi bro! I've been working on Paayum Puli (2015 film) in the recent past and i think, the critical recpetion section has enough content. However, i am unsure of my work's accuracy. Hence, i request you to take a glance at it and copy-edit the section. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:20, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the article and as I said before, it looks really good to me. I've just rearranged the critical reception section, moving the more positive to the top and the more negative ones to the end, but it's difficult since almost all reviews are very mixed. Overall, the article looks very fine, in my opinion :) Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot bro! I may take it to GA status in the future, that's why i developed it now to such extent (to avoid loss of potential info which usually die). I imagined it to be definitely better than Pandiya Naadu and just like any other Vishal and Suseenthiran's film in the near past, the female lead role is horribly written. Period! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So is this Pavan's first attempt at making a non-Telugu film a GA? Then good luck with it! Veera, I think even you have the potential to make a GA some day. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This can't be confirmed as my first non-Telugu GA attempt Kailash. If this film is as bad as the reviewers claim, i shall execute plan-B. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kailash, you want to know a secret? In the past (under a different name) I have taken some articles to GA status (in collaboration with other editors). I find the whole process too strenuous so I don't do that anymore. I'm perfectly happy with cleaning up, copy-editing and expanding here and there. Maybe some day I will do that again. Maybe... :) Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 16:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't tell me you follow sockpuppetry. But new accounts created due to loss of passwords may be acceptable. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh god, no! I didn't log in for a long time and had forgotten the password. I never wanted to create a new account actually but once you edited here it's hard to not come back. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala and Kailash29792: Happened to notice Pavan mentioning " I imagined it to be definitely better than Pandiya Naadu and just like any other Vishal and Suseenthiran's film in the near past, the female lead role is horribly written. Period!" I would personally say that the female lead role might have been written like that due to the ability of the actress to perform. Kajal is alright but still needs to work on her language. Knowledge of the language makes it easier for the director to give a meaty role to the actress. Pity that we hardly get a proper-Tamil speaking heroine in the industry among the current bunch as that creates a setback in the film's story/script. Its time filmmakers looked past glamour in case of actresses and focused more on their performance and dubbing. Take Sruthi Haasan for example. A half-Tamil (Sarika's from Delhi), her dubbing in Poojai (snippets from Adithya Channel) was horrible to say the least and lead me to think that she was better in 7aum Arivu. Why did they choose her for Best Actress at Filmfare when Samantha was better in Manam? Samantha has some potential (only some) but she needs to be more versatile than just submit herself to "Girl-next-door" roles. Hansika tries hard but still her voice would never suit her acting (see Puli's audio launch for further details). So its only right that her voice is dubbed. Its about time Nayanthara dubbed in her own voice for her roles. Trisha's trying something new with Nayagi. Glad to see Jo back. Looking forward to seeing her in more films in the future.

— Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The main reason why I think Tamil producers typically choose non-Tamil actresses (mostly those from Bombay) for their films is because of their glamour quotient, that could be a salvaging moment. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Right you are, Kailash. BTW, on Lakshmi Menon, she's more of what one would call a "Good luck charm" instead of an actress as all the films that she featured in so far were successful. She needs to choose roles which offer her more scope (which she most probably would do after her education). As I said, its time filmmakers looked past glamour in case of actresses and focused more on their performance and dubbing (especially the latter!). — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naanum Rowdydhaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited D. Imman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pokkiri Raja. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mayabazar

I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. If interested, please leave your comments here. All constructive comments are welcomed. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nerukku Ner (2015 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nerukku Ner (2015 film). Since you had some involvement with the Nerukku Ner (2015 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 96 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sun TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Iruvar Ullam (2017 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Iruvar Ullam (2017 film). Since you had some involvement with the Iruvar Ullam (2017 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:21, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scarlett Wilson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scarlett Wilson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarlett Wilson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 08:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Avantika Mohan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Avantika Mohan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sippai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sippai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sippai (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Your edits may be far and few, but your expansions are legendary.DareshMohan (talk) 02:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]