Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2013/08

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2013

01 August 2013

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, edit-warring, miscellaneous disruption. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: IPs and new editors have been messing with the page layout, which really bugs AnomieBOT, who maintains the page. I can't really see a reason for a non-autoconfirmed editor to request bot approval, either. Theopolisme (talk) 17:00, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 19:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Attempted improvements to article seem to face a brickwall with a user who seems to exude "ownership" over this article and has no sense of compromise or conversation that does not appeal to their own sense of what it ought to be. The introduction needs to be broken into two parts and the second (and overly-long) paragraph is not an introduction to the article's content but subject matter on its own and ought to be in an appropriate headed section. JesseRafe (talk) 14:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only see a couple reverts in the past week. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:42, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:32, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over the last few days, despite an open RFC. kashmiri TALK 14:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. the unregistered users are making a disruptive edits about the facts of who has won the Diamond Award claiming that Justin Bieber has received it... please do lock it they have exhausted is.... :( Fidel 12:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:28, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The thing is that this article relates to a very prestigious Music Award that's only the Major Pop, R&B and Rock artists gained it... So I do suggest a longtime semi-protection would be very needed as its been badly edited Fidel 14:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Let me know if disruption continues upon expiry and I'll re-protect for longer. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:44, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – slow moving editwar with an IP introducing excessive dab-links. The Banner talk 14:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:35, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This article as its topic say attract rival IP editors from both sides making unsourced changes. Keeping it sourced and updated is really difficult. SMS Talk 13:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:33, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection for atleast 3-4 weeks: There's lots of IP vandalism going around the article.----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 13:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Intense flurry of IP vandalism due to recent current events. StAnselm (talk) 12:20, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 13:02, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated inclusion of speculation and edits without reliable sources by IP editors. Creativity-II (talk) 09:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 10:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extend the protection. There's some disruptive IP keep vandalising the lock. ✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎ 16:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you asked User:Lectonar if he's willing to extend it? Mark Arsten (talk) 16:14, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've gone ahead and semi-protected for a week, as the IP didn't seem to be bothered by the PC1. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 10:00, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

also need to have it removed from User:Nakon/cascade2. Frietjes (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Plastikspork has sorted out the cascading protection. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

also need to have it removed from User:Nakon/cascade2. Frietjes (talk) 18:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Plastikspork has sorted out the cascading protection. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

also need to have it removed from User:Nakon/cascade2. Frietjes (talk) 18:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:22, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

also need to have it removed from User:Nakon/cascade2 and User:Nakon/cascade3. Frietjes (talk) 18:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Plastikspork has sorted out the cascading protection. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template article link is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

also need to have it removed from User:Nakon/cascade2 and User:Nakon/cascade3. Frietjes (talk) 18:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Plastikspork has sorted out the cascading protection. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

also need to have it removed from User:Nakon/cascade2 and User:Nakon/cascade3. Frietjes (talk) 18:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:11, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

also need to have it removed from User:Nakon/cascade2 and User:Nakon/cascade3. Frietjes (talk) 18:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Plastikspork has sorted out the cascading protection. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template article link is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Frietjes (talk) 18:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Frietjes (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Frietjes (talk) 22:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Note, may also have cascade protection from another page. Frietjes (talk) 22:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Note, may also have cascade protection from another page. Frietjes (talk) 22:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Note, may also have cascade protection from another page. Frietjes (talk) 22:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Note, may also have cascade protection from another page. Frietjes (talk) 22:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Note, may also have cascade protection from another page. Frietjes (talk) 22:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reduce to semi-protection, template is currently broken, and not widely used (see User talk:Jimp#Convert/LoffAoffDbSoffImp. I would like to fix it. Note, may also have cascade protection from another page. Frietjes (talk) 22:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs persistently and selectively reverting content due to a talk page dispute, resulting in an unstable article. IPs seem to be SPAs. AussieLegend (✉) 02:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 00:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five days. Tiptoety talk 02:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This new template is split from (and used by) Template:Afc cleared which is indefinitely semi-protected as a high-risk template. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 03:12, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Highly used. Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 23:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 02:35, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Highly visible template. Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 21:58, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 02:32, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just came off of semi and vandalism resumed. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP adding unreliably sourced information that is beginning to cause an edit warring problem.Texas141 (talk) 21:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for five days by User:Bbb23. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:28, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:59, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 02:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Disruptive editing Anonymous IPs persistently change chart peaks into unsupported chart peaks. The disruption grew especially today.--Harout72 (talk) 20:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:25, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding unsourced information and vandalism. Beerest355 Talk 19:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I am requesting that all articles related in part to Jonas Brothers be protected, due one an IP address continuing to add bare URL's as sources, with many of which not even being credited under a WP:RELIABLE in order to give editors time to re-do pages and make proper sourcing. These pages are a mess, and don't hold up to the standards of Wikipedia at all. livelikemusic my talk page! 17:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Please add new sections for each article you want protected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

02 August 2013

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. BenisonPBaby 12:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Declined What on earth for? That's two weird requests you've made now. GedUK  12:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism prone page BenisonPBaby 12:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC). BenisonPBaby 12:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There were 2 edits in July, almost the entire month apart. THen it was a month before the previous edit in early June. Was this the right article? GedUK  12:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection' This page is currently being linked by an advertisement posted at the top of all Wikipedia pages. It was recently edited into a spam article. Such a high traffic page that virtually all visitors are likely to see should have some measure of protection applied to it. Banaticus (talk) 19:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that to sign up for the Visual Editor newsletter you have to edit the page. I'm very hesitant to fully protect it, since that would stop people from signing up. I'm not sure if semi-protection would be advisable, since there is a good reason for new users to be editing it, although they're a small portion of the newsletter signups at this point. Thoughts, anyone? Mark Arsten (talk) 19:35, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment)I don't see much vandalism given the level of activity, and I don't think a page linked by something highly visible deserves protection the same way a page transcluded by something does. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's not that bad, and any problesm are quickly reverted given the watcher number. GedUK  11:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This page has IP users who kept on adding unsourced biographies of a living people. Jianhui67 (talk) 13:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. For some reasons, multiple IP editors are changing the release date (obtained from Madonna's website) to another date citing Madonna fansites. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 07:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Psgm (talk) 06:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC) sky blues trust are attaching themselves to the Coventry city page with no formal connection. should have own separate page. They are in effect putting a biography as the reference is to their own wewbsite. Other longer existing fan groups exist, but are NOT included on this page - one of them has annual award yet is NOT included on the page. therefore any mention of the sky blues trust is a biography and breaks Wikipedia rules on biography. They constantly reinsert this info hence vandalism[reply]

To the admin, this editor is blatanty disrupting that page just refer to this sock. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator The Rambling Man.. GedUK  12:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP editor edit warring, resumed directly following temporary semi-protection. Binksternet (talk) 04:16, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent removal of spoilers by IP users. Pending Changes may also be an alternative. Cheers!  drewmunn  talk  12:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 07:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:38, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect for a few weeks.. IP changing the Infobox to include Europa League appearances and goals, when it's only Premier League stats here. I am sick of reverting. . JMHamo (talk) 00:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Σosthenes12 Talk 00:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, with as fast as the IPs and newly registered accounts are popping up (especially within seconds of each other), it's some kind of intricate WP:Sockpuppetry and/or WP:Meatpuppetry going on there. It's like an organized attack. Flyer22 (talk) 00:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Editors continue to submit unsourced content, specifically a future film release date, to the article in vio of WP:CRYSTALBALL. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent rash of IP vandalism. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Mark Arsten (talk) 01:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of content by multiple IPs. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:05, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Vandalism of article by 66.65.113.75 - changing name of park to false name w/out source just to annoy San Franciscans. IP lookout shows individual from same area as 173.63.176.93(sockpuppet of blocked user Thmc1) who keeps vandalizing "Chinatown, Manhattan", "Chinatown", "Chinatowns in the United States" and "London". Log of 66.65.13.75 shows edit of only 5 articles, but 3 of these articles(Dolores Park, Kate Murray and White Plains, NY") match those edited by 173.63.176.96/Thmc1/ and his other sockpuppets. Chances of this being a co-incidence is rare..Highly suspect person vandalizing this article also the vandal of page protected "Chinatown, Manhattan". I STRONGLY SUGGEST BLOCKING THESE IPs w/warning on Thmc1's SPI oage and 173.63.176.93's page.MBaxter1 (talk) 18:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism and addition of unsourced content. King Jakob C2 17:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only see a couple problematic edits in the past week. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:26, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continued edit warring over an image. ViperSnake151  Talk  14:55, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm now discussing this with the IP editor. If the problem is due to one person then a block is more logical than semiprotection. EdJohnston (talk) 15:06, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined - Let's wait and see if there is a response. EdJohnston (talk) 18:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

03 August 2013

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term non-autoconfirmed vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Articles are likely to become a high profile target after some recent news. Some BLP violations and vandalism so far. Яehevkor ✉ 19:21, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:47, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant removal of a category on this page. Requires temporary page protection. Razorflame 18:08, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP's suggesting a long-canceled teen show which ended with a burn-off on a low-tier network will get a second season, along with long-term vandalism and ship wars going back a year. First article taken to AfD, but protection should be a first step before WP:TNT'ing the article by far (how nobody in this article knew about RFP eludes me). Nate • (chatter) 06:18, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (the series) Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (the list of episodes) Mark Arsten (talk) 16:31, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Disruptive editing IPs constantly make unsupported changes including replacing Gold certification with not yet issued Platinum certification.--Harout72 (talk) 17:03, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is an edit war going on between pro-Indian Government and pro-Sikh editors. I have failed in trying to get them to compromise. My warnings don't seem to work either. SH 16:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs keep edit-warring in to the lede, without sourcing, that his films are "polarizing" based off an ORish interpretation of film reviews. The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 16:44, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:13, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP and new editors replacing sourced info with unsourced. NeilN talk to me 16:18, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:12, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and dubious unsourced additions/changes. STATic message me! 15:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit warring. Toccata quarta (talk) 11:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment)support temporary protection due to persistent edit warring by User:Aikatastrophe and I.P socks despite warning.Flat Out let's discuss it 12:18, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor repeatedly adding image that has been flagged as possible copyright vio on commons; that issue needs to be solved first before image appears here. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:26, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Already for a long time I have infrequent visits of Korean IP's and brand new accounts vandalising my user page and talk page, here and on the Dutch Wikipedia. Most likely due to an earlier clash about the "Rusk Papers" about a year ago. I can't do anything about the vandalism on my talk page (except referring the vandal for perm block) but I can request semi-protection for my user page to keep the vandals out... The Banner talk 12:43, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 16:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Longer block needed due to persistent addition of speculation and unconfirmed info by IP editors. Creativity-II (talk) 07:18, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:42, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 16:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Perennial vandalism from IPs. Regular editor traffic is low enough so that the lead paragraph had been missing for over a month. Additionally, IP vandalism immediately resumed after a 1 month block expired. 8ty3hree (talk) 05:19, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected —Tom Morris (talk) 06:17, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He's may be coming to an MLS team in the next few days. Lots of vandalism and unsubstantiated claims. OlYeller21Talktome 04:26, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 04:30, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dawnseeker2000 03:39, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism resumed after the previous protection expired. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:50, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and disruptive editing from multiple accounts. Into the Rift (talk) 03:10, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:45, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent dubious unsourced additions or factual inaccuracies being added. STATic message me! 22:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:18, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi: Previous/expected vandalism and propaganda - Subject reportedly came out as lesbian and people are itching to add that to the article, even though it's not fully proven yet. Abcdefg0 (talk) 20:28, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – PC level 1 protection would be fine due to short-term vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Mark Arsten (talk) 00:17, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Mass edit warring over whether one specific source is reliable. Temporary full protection should force them to the talk page to resolve the issue. . — Richard BB 14:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Just a tiff between User:Tarc, User:The Devil's Advocate, User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz, User:Mathsci, et al, Wikipedia and Wikipediocracy regulars. If it really gets out of hand, ping User:Alison - she'll sort those naughty boys out good and proper. Shirt58 (talk) 15:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring by autoconfirmed users – Also, some of the episode summaries repeatedly posted may be copyvios. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:38, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit warring by autoconfirmed users seems to have slowed down. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

04 August 2013

Semi-protection: Long history of IP vandalism and violations of the WP:BLP policy, which has been increasingly bad the last couple days. STATic message me! 21:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:49, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:52, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all edits since 17 June have been vandalism or reverts of vandalism. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:54, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:50, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – too much vandalism. 0alx0 (talk) 16:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I can see very little vandalism over the last week or so. A couple of small pieces, and a little edit war. GedUK  17:11, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has just been announced as 12th Doctor Who. Shearonink (talk) 18:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator SoWhy. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 19:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:43, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 15:00, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
Names previously withheld from the media by police due to privacy concerns have apparently become public knowledge through a blog. IPs are repeatedly adding the names, sometimes including unsourced speculation regarding their involvement in the death, despite no reliable sources existing that confirm the names. Wayne (talk) 06:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:19, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by a (changing) IP, who keeps promoting a barely notable chess player's analyses, as well as his own WP:OR. Toccata quarta (talk) 08:03, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there is also a WP:COI going on—see [1] and [2]. Toccata quarta (talk) 08:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Repeated IP vandalism, changing names of characters and links to other articles.--Dmol (talk) 07:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:21, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring and disruptive editing from multiple IP. Into the Rift (talk) 05:38, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mfield (Oi!) 05:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I posted this page's URL in his Facebook fanpage. It will generate high traffic and there could be a possible vandalization. Wintaburr (talk) 03:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:18, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:48, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: All recent IP/non autoconfirmed edits have been reverted; it is unlikely that a new editor will be familiar enough with this guideline to productively edit it. WP:N is indefinitely semi'd for similar reasons. VQuakr (talk) 04:27, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs within the last 24 hours. —MelbourneStar☆talk 04:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Slacka123 (talk) 04:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This person is in a fight tonight, and there has been quite a bit of vandalism on this page. It should be temporarily protected until the UFC fight is over and vandalism will stop. Razorflame 23:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and dubious unsourced/unreliably sourced content, violations of the WP:BLP policy. STATic message me! 23:21, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:19, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – 3RR violations going on here.. please lock until content dispute is resolved. JMHamo (talk) 18:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring has died down now and protection is no longer required. Thanks JMHamo (talk) 19:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Feel free to re-report if edit warring resumes. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Elle_Macpherson page is way out of date. She married someone else in the last few days. Can someone fix / update / correct the page please?

http://www.smh.com.au/national/elle-macpherson-marries-in-fiji-20130804-2r6yy.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noasshats (talk • contribs) 23:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done It looks like someone added something about this to the page today. If you have specific comments, I'd voice them at Talk:Elle Macpherson. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Constant additions of gossip concerning who she may or may not be dating, and the like. — Confession0791 talk 22:47, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Mark Arsten (talk) 23:00, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism... Razorflame 22:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:59, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent target for BLP related vandalism. A protection period of over a year ended just a few weeks ago. STATic message me! 22:19, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:56, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant dubious unsourced content additions or factual inaccuracies . STATic message me! 21:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:00, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:14, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

05 August 2013

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Announced Sunday as the latest Dr. Who - persistent/ongoing drive-by vandalism by IP-editors. Shearonink (talk) 19:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced and factually incorrect content additions by IP editors. STATic message me! 17:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It states that IPs can contribute in discussion, but the protection doesn't allow us to. -An upset IP.

It shouldn't affect any of the actual RfA threads, and there are none present anyway at the moment. I don't see why this should be lifted. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:35, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Agreed, IPs can still comment on individual requests, but there's no reason for IPs and new users to be editing the main Rfa page. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:45, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism over some months. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:07, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow burning edit war between several registered users and one IP. The Banner talk 17:42, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:09, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: Persistent disruptive editing. This regards that a former living person has died recently. PrivateMasterHD (talk) 11:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I see that there's been an increase in activity, but I don't see the disruptive edits. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:20, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Rajaram Sarangapani (talk) 08:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) The last IP edit was three weeks ago and the last problematic IP edit four weeks ago. I don't think that's enough for protection. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:09, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. The same IP appears to do this periodically. Wolcott (talk) 14:42, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recurring, rampant vandalism by multiple IPs over the past couple of days.Ppt1973 (talk) 14:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:26, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:SWAT (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A bunch of shifting IP addresses (presumed to be this user) are repeatedly calling for a WP:NOTVOTE to overthrow consensus. Article was protected for three days last week, but they're back again now it's expired. McGeddon (talk) 12:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Repeated disruptive addition of channel list despite numerous reverts by editors. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:50, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There are many users who are adding dates without a definite source for them. i.e. Kesha's official website or her Twitter/Facebook pages. Rackshea (talk) 06:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rackshea, the problem seems to be with IPs misunderstanding our verifiability policy, not with the registered users involved, so I have opted for semi-protection. Also, we only use indefinite protection for pages with long-standing problems with vandalism, etc. If the IPs resume adding badly-sourced material after the week's protection is up, please request semi-protection again here. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: This athlete is non-notable per WP:ATHLETE however, Pmaster12 has added several non-notable articles recently aiming to having pages for the entire New York Jets roster template (recent non-notable articles include Patrick Scales and J. B. Shugarts). Protecting this through the month of August would be ideal until cut downs begin. The Writer 2.0 Talk 02:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. I've left a message on Pmaster12's talk page instead. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:03, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. Maybe PC protection would work, however there is just constant vandalism from multiple users. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent pushing of nationalist agenda by anon IP to call city by its Polish name in the article. Anon IP editing against consensus without edit summaries or initiating discussion on Talk Page. --Taivo (talk) 02:07, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:50, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Playing going on all day from what looks like someone using worldwide proxies. It's harmless, but disruptive. Dawnseeker2000 02:03, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Longstanding and popular name. No reason to move it to another name. . Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 23:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected Mark Arsten (talk) 00:16, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Mark. Best regards. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:26, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism to a WP:BLP after recent end of page protection. STATic message me! 22:46, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection. Upload war. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – New editors are incorrectly framing the article around OR and as a vanity page for the forums at this website, which is first a private company. Lev (talk) 17:52, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not sure that full protection is the best solution here. It might be a good idea to seek sanctions against the editors at WP:AN3 or WP:ANI. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – problems with IPs and visual editor. —Ryulong (琉竜) 20:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There is a WP:UNDUE amount of negative material being added to this individual's bio. The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 18:48, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:00, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

06 August 2013

Semi-protection: - Plenty of BLP violations and unsourced alterations have affected this article over the last few days; time to shut down the IP user's abuses. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. and page Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism to a WP:BLP. STATic message me! 20:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move-protection: This article has been move-warred a lot. It needs move protection for a couple of months. — ΛΧΣ21 20:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected Mark Arsten (talk) 20:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Violations of the BLP policy, two separate IP users have vandalised it in the last couple of days. One of them appears to be vandalizing various Birmingham City related articles, but is either dynamic, or is otherwise IP hopping, so requesting a block is pointless. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A person with an IP range of 108.128 keeps removing that heterosexuality may refer to a sexual orientation and how it may do so. The person was already blocked as IP 108.128.2.120. Flyer22 (talk) 18:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let me know if it shows up elsewhere and I'll look into a range block. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP issues. Koala15 (talk) 18:36, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There was a discussion on the talkpage where two reliable sources were presented to prove it was a single. unconfirmed editors and IPs keep changing this. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 21:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't perma-protect, but a month of full protection is needed. Bearian (talk) 19:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes (Reviewer). There's currently a revert war being waged, but this article has has a long history of content with verifiability problems being added. —Ruud 10:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I only see one revert in the past week, I'm not sure that's sufficient activity to justify further protection here. One of the parties appears ripe for a topic ban though. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by autoconfirmed users, disagreeing on what "consensus" is. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:23, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This is the second time I ask you guys to do this, b/c last time you only temporarily banned the IP and now he's back for more vandalism. PLEASE do indefinite semi-protection. Thanks. Moester101 (talk) 22:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A persistent IPv6 editor has been engaged in a long-term campaign to vandalize all the dates at this page (and others) Special:Contributions/2601:9:3300:7B:814:3E1E:5863:7E4 Special:Contributions/2601:9:3300:7B:167:F8EF:1796:727, Special:Contributions/2601:9:3300:7B:911A:E537:316F:F010. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: speedy deletion template removed three times today by logged-out editor(s) using multiple IP addresses —rybec 16:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP adding unsourced information. Shadow (talk) 16:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amounts of IP edits, adding unsourced material to the page, and section blanking. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Constant edit-war between Pro- and Anti- Morsi supporters. Facts are being changed to support agendas from both camps. Temporary requested as it may stop once the situation in Egypt calms down. GiggsIsLegend (talk) 15:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am not going to fully protect this, for the time needed for the issue to settle down, which may take months. However, I semi-protected it for a week, which is longer than the prior two iterations. I would need to see some consensus on the talk page, or a lot more vandalism, before unilaterally taking administrative action for such a visible page. Feel free to get a second opinion now, or in a week. Bearian (talk) 17:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP vandalism. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 15:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:25, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Slow motion IP section blanking. Suraj T 11:06, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 17:25, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Widr (talk) 09:53, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. An I.P has heavily edited the article about Persekam Metro FC, an Indonesian football club. This came to light when he suggested that Jim Magilton had been appointed their manager, despite his recent appointment as Technical Director to the Irish FA. I see that the same IP has been making similar edits to the club article on Indonesian Wikipedia. As most of the edits are dubious to say the least, can this article be protected? Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A country's article needs protection from vandalism edits (High level of IP vandalism). বিজয় চক্রবর্তী (Bijoy Chokroborti) ✉ 10:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. At this point, stopping the edit war is a greater priority. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-proection. There's currently an edit war there that just happened. Jianhui67 (talk) 13:25, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for one month by User:Future Perfect at Sunrise. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:25, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Adding of factual errors, non-notable people, and generic vandalism by multiple editors all throughout last month and this month. Few constructive contributions. Jackmcbarn (talk) 11:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request for at least 6 months of page protection. The article was also semi-protected before for three months, but had expired last June 19, 2013. Vandalism has been happening in the article before and has happen many times. This type of vandalism are coming from different unknown IPs (mostly coming from Israel). They were all given warnings but seemingly doesn't stop. There actions shows that they treat vandalism as a form of hobby (There is no week that they don't vandalize the articles). Other articles have already been semi-protected to six months to a year with some others semi-protected indefinitely (see records here: The Biggest Loser patrol page). AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 11:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:29, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

semi protection: Content dispute and vandalism by various users. Monterey Bay (talk) 02:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by Mark Arsten. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 09:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite sem-protection: This is a page plagued with a lot of issues. Primarily it has been a playground for some anonymous editor to insert and re-insert a big graft of WP:SYNTH, primarily without reference. I've repeatedly asked the anonymous editor to take it to the talk page, but they continue to revert, claiming "vandalism". This isn't a content dispute; this is about masses of texts without reference or synthesized references. It would appear that some anonymous user greatly values pushing their personal theories. There's an ongoing vote to just make it redirect to Dwarf (Germanic mythology). I request that the page gets protected until the vote is resolved. :bloodofox: (talk) 23:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined/ Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. This page may of be interest to new users and IPs, but everyone would probably agree that we are sick and tired of reviewing and reverting spam on this page. If new users want to add their name to the newsletter, they can ask and we can do it. Insulam Simia (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper adding false details both yesterday & today. Yesterday's IP blocked, but today the IP being reported at WP:AIV will probably be declined. Dawnseeker2000 01:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 01:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Razorflame 00:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There is some occasional vandalism, but it was fine for about two months before today and there seem to be a lot of good anon edits. There is only one IP vandalizing the article right now - I'd prefer to just block the IP if they continue rather than protect the page. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Razorflame 00:07, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. making protection unnecessary. Tiptoety talk 00:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Can we put pending changes protection on this for a month? IP has threatened to sock [3]. NeilN talk to me 00:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Highly visible template. Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 00:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 01:20, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be some kind of edit warring going on. Astros4477 (Talk) 14:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of User vandalism. Users that are members of this organization are attempting to control this article after multiple warnings. After many discussions, the user Kapil.xerox refuses to let any edits done. He does not help users and his intentions are not in favor for Wikipedia but rather for this organization.Swamifraud (talk) 14:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:24, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of dubious unsourced additions or vandalism by IP editors. STATic message me! 23:43, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A user called Flags-Chaser can't understand that all related league articles use the same color system for playoffs, he was told to bring this to WP:FOOTY but he refuse to do so, I ask for the article to be protected and restored to the reviosion that he didn't edited until there is a consensus in FOOTY talk.
  – HonorTheKing (talk) 22:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: User talk page archive which will never be edited again. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 23:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Doctor Who interest. Jamesx12345 20:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:George W. Bush (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated IP-hopping BLPvio vandalism. Fat&Happy (talk) 19:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was semi-protected indefinitely by Malinaccier (talk · contribs) (who is now mostly inactive) in 2009, perhaps it's time to try unprotection.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected. I've reduced the protection to PC1 instead of unprotecting altogether - let's see if the page still attracts any vandalism in that state. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 12:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

07 August 2013

Temporary full protection: Users blanking the article during a merger discussion. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I protected the current revision when I got to the page, not sure which was the wrong version Mark Arsten (talk) 19:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Current sports event, with a lot of IP users come in and edit score before games are finished. People "think" teams will win but no games finished. Has also been vandalized before. Same as 2013–14 UEFA Champions League qualifying phase and play-off round, 2013–14 UEFA Europa League and 2013–14 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round. The later two already semi-protected until end of October. QED237 (talk) 18:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP keeps changing a MOS guideline without discussion. Betty Logan (talk) 10:44, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by User:Black Kite. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated blanking of sourced and notable content without consensus by an anonymous editor. The IP won't respond to the discussion on the talk page, and as they keep ip-hopping I can't discuss it on their user talk page. Semi-protection would at least force them to login so that I could try to further engage the editor in discussion. TDL (talk) 17:56, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page is being vandalized by sockpuppets of the report's subject. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:51, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 16:54, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations. Previous request for protection resulted in pending changes. Request for full lock for confirmed users only. . SFK2 (talk) 14:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:43, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: There is a separatist movement in Andhra Pradesh for the creation of an ethno-linguistic state to be called Telangana. This article periodically attracts anons pushing that separatist agenda. Sitush (talk) 15:06, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving...

move-protected: Stop people renaming article during name discussion. Please protect for a minimum of several days or longer. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 13:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected Mark Arsten (talk) 14:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving...

Semi-protection: We've already had two T-Mobile IPs on the same range posting almost identical comments, which I strongly suspect to be the same person; given that the subject matter is controversial, and that both IPs have posted BLP violations, I suggest we get this locked down. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GB fan 10:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection. Persistent edit warring and refusal to discuss by a single-purpose account. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going vandalism by various IPs. . SummerPhD (talk) 04:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:23, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This is the second time I ask you guys to do this, b/c last time you only temporarily banned the IP and now he's back for more vandalism. PLEASE do indefinite semi-protection. Thanks.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The IP hasn't edited in four days. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: no need for IPs to edit this template. Qxukhgiels (talk) 20:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Unless I'm mistaken it doesn't seem to be widely used. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amounts of IP edits, adding unsourced material to the page, and section blanking. AlneltheGreat (talk) 00:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mark Arsten (talk) 17:29, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent adding of joke entries in article from various IPs. Article was previously protected for one week, vandals have returned after protection ended. AD (talk) 23:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Highly visible template – This is going to be the new main code page for WP:IGLOO, and as such I feel it should be protected from vandalism. I've already discussed this with Ale_jrb (the original creator of Igloo) and he agreed that now that Igloo is a collaborative project, it (and all its info) should be moved to the project namepace. Thanks. Kangaroopowah 23:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Mark Arsten (talk) 23:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – repeated recreation of an article redirected via AFD. Gaijin42 (talk) 23:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected I don't seen any move warring, but I do see failure to adhere to the outcome of the Afd. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Just came off of semi-protection, and the BLP violations resumed. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Try again in a week or so. Bearian (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

08 August 2013

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP editors keep inserting weaselly, out of guideline content and refuse to engage in dialogue about it. My postings are all that appear on the article talk page, where you will find the details of the latest rounds of this. I am at 3RR on this, so I would ask that the protecting admin roll it back to the last version prior to this one. Gtwfan52 (talk) 19:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (and you've only made two reverts today) Mark Arsten (talk) 19:31, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 19:10, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism and disruption . Qxukhgiels (talk) 14:57, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: GrandMasterEl (talk · contribs). Gamaliel (talk) 15:11, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Article is suffering persistent vandalism, vandlism is being bragged about on social media inspiring further vandalism. --Licourtrix (talk) 18:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:59, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated unsourced attribution of a particular actor a particular role, confirmed by no reliable sources. Evanh2008 (talk|contribs) 18:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: She seems to be (just) notable now, article is at Lucy fry and should be moved here. The-Pope (talk) 15:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 18:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 18:18, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:21, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blanking of sections / content by apparent IP hopper. — MusikAnimal talk 17:21, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:54, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive dubious unsourced content additions. STATic message me! 13:50, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Constant changes from multiple IP users despite requests to discuss such changes, becoming an WP:EDITWAR. Was temp semi-protected a month ago and as soon as lifted multiple IP user changes from multiple users resumed. RonSigPi (talk) 11:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP sockpuppets of Bertrand101. Areaseven (talk) 10:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salting: AfD result was delete; article was recreated under same name, deleted again, now recreated as Mark A Fischer —rybec 17:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 17:50, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salting if not already done: recreation of Mark A .Fischer —rybec 17:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 17:50, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the last days. Turgeis (talk) 17:23, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SMS Talk 12:21, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Gamaliel (talk) 15:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP editors from at least two different addresses are repeatedly adding a statement that Smith will substitute for Tony Stewart to the article. While this is in fact the most likely outcome, it has not been confirmed (indeed, it has been stated that the team is still considering candidates for the substitution). As there have been no other IP edits to the article in nearly two months, I believe that semi-protection for a week, with it being lifted if a decision is made (and reported in RS) sooner, would be appropriate here. The Bushranger One ping only 11:57, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Gamaliel (talk) 15:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection - IPs, new registered accounts and sockpuppets continually removing some content from this page for a long long time! I've requested temporary semi-protection to the page but to no avail on its expiry. Chris1636 (talk) 04:38, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Last protection was semi for 1 month, immediate resumption of disruptive edits upon expiry indicates longer period needed. Semi is appropriate here vs. a full lockdown. - The Bushranger One ping only 12:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Currently facing edit-warring edits from not-identical-but-related IP addresses to insert a phrase. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – This page keeps getting vandalized, sometimes accidentally due to copying/pasting. Paris1127 (talk) 00:01, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:34, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Continual reinsertion of pretty much meaningless sentence to lede. Hillbillyholiday talk 22:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, first time I've had to request page-protection, not sure if it's the right category. Thanks - Hillbillyholiday talk 22:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. by User:Monty845. Since it was only that one IP, the block should take care of it. Let me know if another IP/new user picks up the edit war and I'll protect. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Mark. Was it the correct category for future reference? -- Hillbillyholiday talk 23:20, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that was correct. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced content additions. STATic message me! 22:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:12, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect for a few weeks, unsourced speculation about a transfer away from Everton, Wikipedia is not a place for rumour. JMHamo (talk) 22:17, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:10, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the news, lots of interest, fairly contentious. Jamesx12345 22:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:05, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep inserting fringe claims into the stub. Previous RPP was denied due to insufficient IP activity, but there have been many revisions made over the past few weeks. Andrew327 20:05, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

09 August 2013

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:03, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated removal of sourced information by apparent IP-hopper. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:55, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:57, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Removing cited material and replacing with their own uncited content while ignoring calls to stop doing so from registered users. If possible, please extend to Aeroput article as well since there is a consistent pattern of this IP user/s editing on related articles. Buttons (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is getting vandalized with the name of Rahul Gandhi, an Indian politician. Harish / talk / Contributions 19:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Apollo 10 (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – an unknown being. kept on disrupting the talk page and wouldn't stop . SefBau :  msg  19:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:23, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please extend that to all Apollo Talk pages. An IP hopping, block evading vandal keeps adding German conspiracy spam to all of them. Yintan  19:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done I think I got them all, let me know if I missed any. Or feel free to add new sections here. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:37, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent IP edits in BLP. Rahat | ✉ 14:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It has only been vandalized twice in the past month. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:19, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been subject to lots of IP vandalism after recent news stories. Protection required until this dies down and vandalism and biased editing will stop. Adam4267 (talk) 18:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:35, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. and page Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive edits due to adding dubious unsourced content. STATic message me! 18:19, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:23, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated re-creation with copyright material by editor way after final warnings. Fiddle Faddle 13:36, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Just three re-creations in under half an hour. User blocked. On my watchlist.  —SMALLJIM  13:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Highly visible template. Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 13:12, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 16:23, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent acts of vandalism within 24 hours of being unprotected. VanguardScot 12:19, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Article is attracting massive IP vandalism today. Yintan  11:23, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for three days by User:JamesBWatson. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Ongoing edit warring by IP addresses which ignores sources cited and talk page consensus. HelenOnline 07:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Mark Arsten (talk) 15:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Rolling edit war. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:57, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Tentative protection request - a high-profile blogger has printed a serious accusation against this person today, and readers unfamiliar with policy are adding it to the article, sourced to that blog. (Per WP:SPS Wikipedia should never repeat a statement about a third party made only in a self-published blog.) Given the strong and potentially libellous nature of the accusation it may make sense to protect the article for a day or two, or until any mainstream coverage picks it up. McGeddon (talk) 15:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 15:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 09:34, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection at least until August 13: A lot of new users and IP vandals have keep on adding hoax information in this article since last Wednesday. -WayKurat (talk) 05:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP keeps adding a category about racism to character article without providing any sourcing to support this and has been reverted by multiple editors. The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 04:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:36, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated blanking by 69.105.137.218 (talk), 205.157.110.11 (talk), 69.108.51.169 (talk), Iran Love (talk · contribs), etc. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:11, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP user/s frequently adding unsourced content without explanation and no attempt to engage in discussion. Buttons (talk) 23:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP user/s persistently adding unsourced statements/original research despite requests to stop "simply reverting to a badly sourced, non-encyclopedic version" and "to improve the article". No attempt to use talk page to reach consensus.--Technopat (talk) 22:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:15, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Morning277 (or one of his employees) is perpetually removing a CSD tag from an article that they've created.. please either semi it, or just delete the thing. Kevin Gorman (talk) 02:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP user persists in making edits which introduce incorrect information. As per this edit the user has confirmed that they will persist in editing in this manner. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 00:12, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 Days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Come back if a week turns out not to be long enough. Monty845 02:43, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Maybe i'm over-reacting, but i removed what seems to me to be an unverified claim earlier, and it was put back; i've removed it again, but don't want to go anywhere near 3RR territory for any reason. If i'm wrong, tell me; if not, i think some temporary protection is required. Cheers, LindsayHello 20:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 7 Days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Also, BLP violations are a 3rr exception, the exact lines of that exception are vague, but I think your revert would be considered well within it. Monty845 02:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move-protection: TFA. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 00:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salting: User:Madi125/sandbox, about this subject, was deleted under CSD G11. User:Sangoku09/sandbox, about the same subject, popped up 18 hours later. —rybec 18:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'd prefer not to preemptively salt the article, since it hasn't been created in articlespace yet. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lady Lotus (talk) 11:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I only see three IPs in the past couple of weeks, and their edits seem constructive. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:31, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent attempts of adding unsourced statements by IP users who fail to use Talk page. Borsoka (talk) 20:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – almost 20 accounts within the last week. Stephreef (talk) 17:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I only see four accounts in the past week, and their edits seem constructive to me (unless I'm missing something). Mark Arsten (talk) 18:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant disruptive editing from one particular IP user, despite warnings about their behaviour. User has made similar edits to numerous other tennis related articles as well. JayJ47 (talk) 05:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: user warned. Rami R 07:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now, let's see if he heeds the warning. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

10 August 2013

Temporary semi-protection: repeated attempts by IP editors and by an editor using a new account to cleanse the article of information critical of the company —rybec 16:15, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism, especially addition of unconfirmed actors in the cast section. Requesting a long temporary protection period. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:00, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:20, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Addition of unsourced content. SMS Talk 15:50, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Switched from PC to semi per high volume of disruption. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:19, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IPs and newbies. Besides there is a edit war going on between some IPs. SMS Talk 15:49, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An edit was is in progress. Discussion should start on the article Talk page. Needs admin. intervention A.S.A.P.  –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|— 14:30, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. SMS Talk 13:48, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What type of protection you want? You want us to keep your edition, in which the sourced material has been removed? The same material that has been debated in Rfc? Capitals00 (talk) 14:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Could someone remind me to restore semi-protection when this expires? Mark Arsten (talk) 14:34, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. SMS Talk 13:34, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same as above, no need of further explanation. Capitals00 (talk) 14:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:34, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism by muliple Finland-based IPs. kashmiri TALK 09:55, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Black Kite (talk) 10:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salting: recreated repeatedly under same title —rybec 04:50, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 05:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring and persistent addition of channel listings by anons despite being reverted several times. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:49, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No vandalism in the past ten days. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:09, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – To facilitate discussion without editwar. The Banner talk 23:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection Continual trolling (probably Technoquat) Thanks, -- Hillbillyholiday talk 23:55, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mfield (Oi!) 02:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent edit warring by various IPs and SPAs attempting to insert a news story about the subject that consists of nothing more than allegations at this point. Discussed on WP:BLP/N and the article's talk page. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:34, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:11, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Page has been subject to multiple instances of vandalism as well as good-faith IP editors who do not understand BLP policy regarding self-published allegations directed at subject. Nmillerche (talk) 23:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mfield (Oi!) 02:15, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Resumption of same unsourced edit that caused previous PP. Escape Orbit (Talk) 23:11, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:14, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One editor warring to insert full text of source. Binksternet (talk) 21:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Persistent dynamic IP edits made to the results summary table, adding unsourced data which cannot be confirmed as authentic. These edits have continued despite multiple warnings. I suggest temporary semi-protection for 30 days to let things cool off. Robyn2000 (talk) 12:35, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Agreed. Mfield (Oi!) 02:18, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lady Lotus (talk) 11:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I don't see any recent vandalism, just attempts at making constructive edits. If the content the IP is adding is disputed then dispute resolution should be pursued. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Editors have been attempting to rename government's name for the metropolis. They shouldn't do this!. Student7 (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Florida resident here. I don't think anyone actually calls it that. This strikes me as more a matter for the talk page. I won't reject this request myself, as I'm about to become an involved party by leaving my opinion on the talk page. Gamaliel (talk) 16:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected the page at its current location, which may very well be the wrong version. Additional moves should go through WP:RM. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: edit warring by dynamic IP irrespective of on going talk page discussion. This page was early fully protected for 3 days. . Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 08:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. to allow for the talk page discussion, and any other WP:DR needed, to play out. The Bushranger One ping only 12:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to semi-protection after discussion. - The Bushranger One ping only 16:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

11 August 2013

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. STATic message me! 20:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  20:16, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced content additions. STATic message me! 17:06, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection:A IP inserting links, he or she already made over 4 reverts. OwnDealers (talk) 19:07, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Full protection not justified based on the edit history, since it's only IPs making the edits. Semi-protection or pending changes protection may be in order. —C.Fred (talk) 19:19, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea, just make it editable for registered users. OwnDealers (talk) 19:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  20:15, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The creating editor seems to be determined to create this article and removes useful guidance tags without engaging in conversation. Short term create protection should overcome this. The entity has notability, this is just the wrong way to create the article. Fiddle Faddle 14:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion.. GedUK  16:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jetstreamer Talk 13:16, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  16:16, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is an exercise in adding any unfounded claim imaginable, have tried redirecting it as film isn't filming yet but they undo it, so trying to manage it but a quick glance at the edit history shows how that is going. Needs protecting. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 11:19, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: lots of unfounded transfer speculation by IP's and new editors. --Jaellee (talk) 10:02, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  16:11, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Per last request, constant IP removal of WP:SPOILER material. Revisions were enabled at last request, but the issue continues.  drewmunn  talk  09:13, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  16:06, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs in past few weeks; large chunks of content removed, replacing with out-dated material. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  16:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. SMS Talk 05:32, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I've warned the users instead. Please report them to WP:ANEW if the edit warring continues. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit warring by the user named "Nikhilmn2002". OwnDealers (talk) 04:37, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit warring by "Nikhilm2002", removes discussion on his page. OwnDealers (talk) 04:37, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:45, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. STATic message me! 04:18, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandals attempting to introduce factual errors. Elizium23 (talk) 01:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:53, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Alexbandguy and his IP sockpuppets are causing a mess on this article. buffbills7701 01:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Tolly4bolly 18:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

12 August 2013

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 4chan users have persistently been changing all of the numbers to "dubs" (e.g., 44 or 33). This has been going on since 2012. --EstafetteSpurry (talk) 21:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Monty845 21:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism (See [4]) Quis separabit? 21:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Monty845 21:32, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeated IP/new vandalism of this BLP, sometimes personal and vicious - the most recent stood there for 4 hours which is really unacceptable. Page gets thousands of views a day - it is time for indef. Tvoz/talk 20:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism today. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:41, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SMS Talk 19:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – AndresHerutJaim sock active on this page. nableezy - 19:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 19:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: As soon as the previous full protection expired an edit war started. SMS Talk 09:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Consider the Edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – there are multiple teams with similar names (ASC Poli, ASU Politehnica) fighting for the records of the former FC Politehnica Timișoara, popularly known as Poli Timișoara. Since this is a different team, the acronym is important, but the fans of the team are making changes all the time. The Romanian sport magazines use the same method for distinction. Acornboy (talk) 09:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No edits for past two months. Consider WP:RFD Mark Arsten (talk) 15:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Current POV war between pro- and anti-[topic], really needs a time out. Equazcion (talk) 07:31, 12 Aug 2013 (UTC) 07:31, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't think the edit warring justifies full protection at this point, particularly since there are a lot of constructive edits occurring as well. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:53, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been created & deleted 5 times, Thanks . -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 19:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done by User:RHaworth. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:21, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Will no doubt be recreated & deleted repeatedly, Thanks . -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 19:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 19:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the article is a GA, but is very vulnerable to vandals because of the subject's popularity. plus I am not a 24x7 wikipedian, so some vandals might not be noticed. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another one, fanboy attack. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 18:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant disruptive editing by non-users. Please protect the page from editing by non-users. The Witty Warrior (talk) 18:28, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – History shows it all. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 18:05, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection: Target of constant vandalism. There are practically no useful contributions from unregistrered used and the article is a GA. mgeo talk 16:57, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection: The article is currently covered by pending changes, but the level of unhelpful IP edits is, at present, completely ridiculous. I'm requesting semi-protection so myself and other reviewers don't have to constantly keep rejecting the spam and unhelpfully biased edits that various IPs keep adding in. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:04, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant addition of unsourced original research by various IP address editors from the same source. Editor constantly reverts attempts to undo their work, bordering on vandalism, risking a revert war with myself. Warnings and attempts to discuss on talk page are unsuccessful. Has also been going on since November last year, thus a several week (3?) period may stop their disruption. Thanks. Siegfried Nugent (talk) 16:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors regularly adding Telangana as a state, despite the fact that it is not, and will not be for at least 2 more years. It was proposed by the ruling party, but no law has actually been passed yet. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Unprotection was probably not a good idea to begin with. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:08, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Wickey-nl (talk · contribs) refusing to respect WP:BRD and continues reverting without gaining consensus. Number 57 13:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can this happen soon. He's just reverted yet again, and I am unable to restore the original without breaking WP:3RR. Thanks, Number 57 14:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: unexplained removal of sourced information by new users and IP. Rahat | ✉ 10:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let me know if disruption continues upon expiry and I'll reprotect for longer. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request for at least 6 months of page protection. Vandalism are coming from different unknown IPs (mostly coming from Israel). They were all given warnings but seemingly doesn't stop. There actions shows that they treat vandalism as a form of hobby (There is no week that they don't vandalize the articles). Other articles have already been semi-protected to six months to a year with some others semi-protected indefinitely (see records here: The Biggest Loser patrol page). . AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 15:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let me know if disruption continues upon expiry and I'll reprotect for longer. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:50, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jahgro (talk) 15:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:42, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – too many disruptive edits because of the article's popularity. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Requesting temporary full protection. But in case if it takes a long time to attend this request, please see Talk:Bengal#Edits_by_User:AfricaTanz first, protection is not required if consensus is reached or editor(s) are blocked. . Tito☸Dutta 06:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is just another effort to preserve content in this article that has been challenged as unsourced and deleted. User:Dwaipayanc has edit warred to preserve a ton of problematic material, in direct violation of Wikipedia policy, and then this user recruited another editor to continue the edit war in his/her absence. This second editor then continued the edit war. Who is this second editor? None other than the person who has requested page protection. No effort has been made by User:Dwaipayanc to source the material. This user just keeps adding it back, in full with absolutely no sources. You can see the diffs here on User:Dwaipayanc's talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADwaipayanc&action=historysubmit&diff=568172202&oldid=568168195 AfricaTanz (talk) 06:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, in the talk page of the article, I already stated that yes, there are many statements in the article needing references. Lets tag those with citation needed, then give a reasonable time for those to be addressed, and then if not addressed, lets get those deleted. That's a reasonable approach for non-BLP articles, and statements that are not blatant hoax or vandalism. But AfricaTanz did not like that approach. Even though we mentioned WP:V and WP:PRESERVE and WP:BRD, he continues to repeatedly remove material (well, in hindsight, some of those material do need to be removed, but obviously not all, or, not as a blanket deletion). It's probably ok to protect he page, to avoid such warring, and also to let th regular editors provide references.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Have you deleted any of the material that you believe needs references or that needs to be deleted? Nope. You just keep adding it back. Typical edit warring strategy. It takes too much time to decide what unsourced material you want to keep and what you want to delete. So, you just keep everything. Protecting the article as it is now will preserve the article in its pathetic current state, with tons of unsourced material, just like Dwaipayan has sought with the assistance of Titodutta. AfricaTanz (talk) 06:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No I did not delete any material. I started tagging them with citation needed tags. Because that's a good collaborative approach, and is supported by policy.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:53, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Let's be totally clear about what you've done. You have repeatedly reinserted unsourced material that has been challenged and deleted. All of it. Every last character. You have done this despite your self-admitted view that some of the material needs to be removed. You also have refused to add even one source when reinserting the material. You have done no editing whatsoever except add a very limited number of citation-needed tags. When you didn't have time to continue your efforts, you recruited someone else as your replacement and was incivil about me to boot. This replacement did exactly what you wanted and then requested page protection to preserve what the two of you have done. AfricaTanz (talk) 06:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I protected the current version, don't know if that was the "wrong version" or not. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated by multiple accounts. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 15:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Userspace per user request. Jackson Peebles (talk) 14:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 15:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User space request. Jackson Peebles (talk) 14:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 15:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edits are being reverted by non-registered users and even when an explaination is given to them as to why their edits are being reverted back, they continue doing it over and over. Lady Lotus (talk) 13:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: with this version and this High level of vandalism by this user Acornboy. 86.126.19.99 (talk) 14:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected The template for three days and the article for one. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:32, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: repeated recreation, in 2011 after AfDs and recently with sock-puppet accounts (please see User:Imran771/sandbox) —rybec 14:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an anonymous editor changing this page to use "Republic of Ireland" instead of "Ireland". WP:IMOS and WP:IRE-IRL have guidelines for usage which are not being followed. Can we have a temporary protection please, perhaps with only registered editors to edit this page. HighKing (talk) 12:08, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring, despite numerous requests to go to the talk page, where a thread is already discussing the points in question. So far the registered users are discussing rather than warring: it is only IPs who are warring against the status quo. - SchroCat (talk) 07:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I notified the IP and explained at User talk:172.190.125.142#Peter Sellers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:56, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One user has been adding Original Research to the section titled "Boundaries of the proposed state" for quite some time now. In spite of repeated attempts to make him understand about the policies, he has not even tried to understand the same and has engaged in a slow-moving edit war. Shovon (talk) 06:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Full protection too severe for issue with one user. Am talking directly to user first. Mfield (Oi!) 06:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: multiple editors, high edit frequency, disregard for WP:MEDRS, WP:POVPUSH, edit-warring, etc. Slowing this down with page protection should help de-escalate the situation. Mentioned multiple times on WT:MED in the last few days as needing additional eyes, but there are apparently not enough yet. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 10:24, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salting: was speedily deleted twice. —rybec 03:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One of the deletions was a couple years ago, so I'm not sure there's a need for salting at this point. Let me know if it's recreated again though. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:47, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection Random vandalism. Checked IP, history of similar. -- Hillbillyholiday talk 02:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I'm going to hold on on protection for now since before this IP the page had been pretty calm for a few months. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has continuous vandalism, it has been going on for over a month now. The user who keeps adding the fictitious information had their accounts blocked but now IP hops to continue vandalizing. – Recollected • 23:06, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mfield (Oi!) 06:05, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: On Google. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:12, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment At the very least, it probably bears watching. Quite a burst of IP edits, all but a couple of have been in good faith, only a couple of vandalistic edits to this point, but the Google doodle is only two or three hours old. At this point, I would say just keep a watch on it for now. Safiel (talk) 05:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 14 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mfield (Oi!) 05:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs and unconfirmed accounts; vandalism and BLP violations - within last day. —MelbourneStar☆talk 04:50, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:05, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: recent deletion here and at Tom Dyson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) —rybec 04:28, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Mfield (Oi!) 06:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salting: was speedily deleted once, then recreated, then the recreator moved it out of main space. —rybec 04:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Mfield (Oi!) 06:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Was indefinitely semi-protected four years ago. Only semi-protection to date.

Declined, The protecting admin (User:Wizardman) is active. You should contact him. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:50, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So there's no one else who can make this decision? On his page, (User:Wizardman) says "For the month of August I will concentrate solely on article work. Any administrative issues will have to be dealt with elsewhere." --72.64.251.152 (talk) 00:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Went ahead and unprotected it since it has been four years. Though I'll try to keep an eye on the page. Actually impressed someone took my note on my page seriously, thanks for that :) Wizardman 02:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected (for the bot.) tutterMouse (talk) 05:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 04:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:75.62.130.121 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:54, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, and posting of ads and competitors linking their sites. Cky2250 (talk) 22:57, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:47, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Anon IP is adding BLP violation on something that never got wide press coverage (in fact the so called source is non-existent) and the IP has threatened to continue to add the violation. Bidgee (talk) 02:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:28, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow burning edit war between IPs and registered users, with the IPs introducing promo and an excessive number of links to disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 22:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's only been vandalized a couple times in the past two weeks. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Don't know why, but high level of vandalism. Jamesx12345 22:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's only been vandalized a couple times in the past two weeks. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback protection: Too much "Free Minecraft code" spam lately (1 2 3 4), minimal if any genuinely useful feedback. 24.131.230.174 (talk) 03:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback protected Limited to autoconfirmed users. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:24, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: As per article history. A requested move on Talk:Whitebark_pine#Requested_move that was duly closed was summarily ignored a month later by an otherwise uninvolved admin (perhaps in response to a technical move request? not sure). I reverted as per the RM. I was re-reverted, so I re-re-reverted, and I feel silly. Please move-protect this until they actually make a move request (which may well pass--who knows!). Red Slash 02:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected Mark Arsten (talk) 03:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: As per article history. A requested move on Talk:Whitebark_pine#Requested_move that was duly closed was summarily ignored a month later by an otherwise uninvolved admin (perhaps in response to a technical move request? not sure). I reverted as per the RM. I was re-reverted, so I re-re-reverted, and I feel silly. Please move-protect this until they actually make a move request (which may well pass--who knows!). Red Slash 02:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected Mark Arsten (talk) 03:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: An IP recently edited my CSD log for no apparent reason. There's no real reason for anyone other than me to be editing it, and I'd rather not have to worry about making sure I notice any changes to it, so an indefinite semi would be appreciated. Kevin Gorman (talk) 01:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 03:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salting: speedily deleted twice, so far. Repairclinic.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is the most obvious variation. —rybec 00:04, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP making legal threats and blanking content they disagree with. Constructive IP edits are infrequent at best. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over contents of project page, not being discussed on talk page. Request page lock for a few days to work out differences on talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I can't see an edit war; a couple of large edits were reverted, nothing since. GedUK  20:19, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Adnan Januzaj played today in the 2013 Community Shield. Francium12 (talk) 15:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Page exists now GedUK  20:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salting: has been repeatedly recreated. Also Cvision Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), please. —rybec 21:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 23:24, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive IP vandalism. Rushton2010 (talk) 16:19, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and User(s) blocked. GedUK  16:23, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article was declined at AFC solely because it was Salted. Could you unsalt it? buffbills7701 21:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done It's been five years, so I think we can give it another shot. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:23, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

13 August 2013

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. STATic message me! 20:12, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:16, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Came off a semi a few days ago and changes to the (sourced) birth location immediately started again, probably because of some political issue. NeilN talk to me 18:45, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:54, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback unprotection: I don't see any reason feedback was disabled. I can't ask the protecting admin, because there's no log entry for it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Enabled feedback as I couldn't think of a reason not too. If anyone knows of one, please let me know. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple editors vandalizing article, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jenoskians. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. STATic message me! 17:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:44, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock of Фаиз Махмудов. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock of Фаиз Махмудов. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock of Фаиз Махмудов. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and dubious unsourced changes. STATic message me! 16:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:54, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – requesting pending changes. See this diff] for changes since the temporary page protection was lifted. No-one is engaging in the discussion I have tried to start. Gtwfan52 (talk) 15:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/108.249.22.222. SummerPhD (talk) 15:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – People - myself included - have been going back and forth about whether or not it is appropriate to include highly negative information about a living person sourced to tabloids in their biog. Temporary protection would force people to discuss whether or not there is actually a BLP issue, instead of just trying to editwar over it. (I know it's not normal to request a freeze at a particular version, but since there are WP:BLP concerns and BLP matters are normally left out until consensus is established to include them, I would highly suggest freezing the article at the stubbified version.). Kevin Gorman (talk) 16:40, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: repeated recreation; draft at User:Alucian1/sandbox resembles Morning277 version at [5]. —rybec 16:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 16:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: repeated recreation; recently deleted after AfD. Related to David Kiger. —rybec 15:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 16:40, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP vandalism and other disruption . Qxukhgiels (talk) 15:04, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Insulam Simia (talk) 14:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:22, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: 67.87.140.155's famous spree on adding false volumes. ACMEWikiNet (talk) 00:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:48, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and additions of unsourced content. The page has already been protected twice before due to the same issue. STATic message me! 14:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs keep adding unsourced and promotional content, and also claim to be Puder himself. If so, they're also breaching WP:COI and WP:SOCK. Poison Whiskey 14:04, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:30, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism and abusive edit summaries. Widefox; talk 10:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:23, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring. Will encourage IPs and single-edit users to join discussion on talk page instead of warring. Brycehughes (talk) 07:48, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One of the SPAs was autoconfirmed, so semi wouldn't stop him. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: has been repeatedly recreated; new draft in User:Pst9/sandbox —rybec 06:48, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update: the article was moved to Amvona (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) just before I made this request. I made a deletion request after it was moved. —rybec 08:25, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected. DGG protected Amvona for 3 years, and I protected Amvona (company) indefinitely. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:40, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edits wars going on over control of party. 128.250.0.70 (talk) 06:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:12, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Երևանցի talk 06:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That really isn't very high. Only one disruptive IP edit this month. GedUK  08:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism to a article covered under the biography of a living person policy. STATic message me! 04:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  08:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor replacing entire article with a personal essay . Darkness Shines (talk) 23:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by User:Floquenbeam. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism through edit wars, overuse of pictures, and nationalism. Yellowfiver2 (talk) 20:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent IP edits appear to be in good faith. Have you tried to resolve your concerns through discussion? Monty845 21:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I agree with Monty. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP/edit vandalism, I request at least for two months. Because there is minor/major, frequent distraction. (Gokulchandola (talk) 05:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  08:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: A user removing the years old sourced material, by alleging "linkvio" falsely, although i even replaced with other reliable sources. Open at talks too. OwnDealers (talk) 04:57, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw it's protected, but it should be reverted to the original version, like explained here[6]. OwnDealers (talk) 06:37, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Please ask the protecting admin directly on their page about any rollback. GedUK  08:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. STATic message me! 01:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anon who doesn't like the term "soccer" has been intentionally removing it. In some instances he simply changes it to "football (soccer)". Anon has been warned, but it might be easier to lock the article for a week or so to new & anon editor than block the IP. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And now that anon seems to have created User:Footballera to carry on the activities of the anon editor, it may be necessary. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I hardblocked the IP, so let's see if this stops the new guy too. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: 67.87.140.155's famous spree on adding false volumes. ACMEWikiNet (talk) 00:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: 67.87.140.155's famous spree on adding false volumes. ACMEWikiNet (talk) 00:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and recurring addition of copyvio from anons and SPAs, since 2009 based on page logs. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:29, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:45, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Probably shouldn't have been deleted G4. Since the AfD discussion, he has now appeared on the Arsenal First team (or so one of the recreations claimed, I didn't check sources) in a friendly match, also allegedly receiving positive press. In light of which, and the real prospect additional notability may occur in the near future, I don't think create protection is prudent. Really it needs a new AfD. Monty845 21:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jetstreamer Talk 20:23, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've warned the user who was edit warring, if he continues to revert you can report him to WP:AN3 for a 3RR violation. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent unsourced changed. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Nearly every IP or new user edit is vandalism. Personally I see no reason at all why anyone would object to the protection of this page. Ginsuloft (talk) 22:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant low-level IP/new user vandalism from 4chan / ED people. Related to https://encyclopedia dramatica.se/Topkek (remove space). Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 21:48, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Blocked a few too. Monty845 21:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Given that it's the same people as from the entry immediately below, I wonder if longer/indef wouldn't be appropriate. OTOH, we'll see how things go. Not like that page is unwatched. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 22:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Its a reasonable point, though this one doesn't have as long and persistent a history of vandalism. I have no objection if another admin wants to go longer now, but I would need to see a longer history before going long/indef personally. Monty845 22:04, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of biased content being added to the article by multiple new users/ip's recently. -Ryan 21:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

14 August 2013

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. STATic message me! 20:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and additions of unsourced content. The page has a long history of vandalism/dubious unsourced changes and protection periods. STATic message me! 20:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism throughout August and earlier. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:39, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:03, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: deleted in AfD last month, then recreated as Reza Ghorbani MD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Is a Morning277 topic: [7]. —rybec 17:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely by User:NawlinWiki. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected Got it, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: recreated after last month's G5 deletion of WorldEscape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). —rybec 18:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely by User:NawlinWiki. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I didn't think to check first. Sorry for the bother. —rybec 18:34, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Heavy IP vandalism. Ginsuloft (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:20, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP-hopping vandalism over past two months. Blocks did not have the desired deterrent effect (1, 2). Gun Powder Ma (talk) 14:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's been a couple weeks since there were any disruptive edits. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP editor repeatedly vandalizes the article by removing references etc. I suggest a temporary semi-protection of 2 weeks. KAMiKAZOW (talk) 12:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: G5 deletion last month, recreated as GroundWork, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) then G11 deletion today. Creator blocked by NawlinWiki as possible Morning277 puppet. —rybec 17:34, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely by User:NawlinWiki. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: G11 deletion last month, then again today. Creator blocked by NawlinWiki as possible Morning277 puppet. —rybec 17:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely by User:NawlinWiki. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: G5 deletion last month, then recreated as Table Topics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Sublimeharmony link: [8]. —rybec 17:17, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely by User:NawlinWiki. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User talk:96.248.15.44 is vandalizing and edit warring against the whole community. S/he is now temporarily blocked for a 3rd time and likely to resume edit-war once the block expires. AsceticRosé 05:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi Bouncing IP sock of Corsika (talk · contribs) Andy Dingley (talk) 15:31, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  15:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP repeatedly inserting fringe theories and giving them undue weight. Thomas.W talk to me 09:18, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

178.66.210.168 (talk · contribs) blocked by Bishonen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) Bishonen | talk 09:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
User(s) blocked. (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 11:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP repeatedly inserting fringe theories and giving them undue weight. Thomas.W talk to me 09:17, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

178.66.210.168 (talk · contribs) blocked by Bishonen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Bishonen | talk 09:45, 14 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
User(s) blocked. (for the bot). tutterMouse (talk) 11:32, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism throughout the month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:11, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and dubious unsourced additions . STATic message me! 15:11, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalisms by anonymous and new accounts. Have been protected before but the vandalism persists. . Zayeem (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:03, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism to a WP:BLP. STATic message me! 14:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations. Ginsuloft (talk) 13:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Dick Cheney (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated IP-hopping BLP vandalism. Fat&Happy (talk) 13:12, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: bouncing IP editor persistently removing image from infobox without valid reason. Could we protect it for few days until they get bored again. noq (talk) 11:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: High level of disruptive editing. Constant deletion and redirections by a user without valid reason.

The article was redirected, following an Articles for Deletion discussion. Therefore it shouldn't be recreated unless Pepper has recently done something significant outside of Big Brother (UK). Sionk (talk) 12:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done Mark Arsten (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of edits and non-constructive edits. This article was fully protected. Requesting a 2 week's protection. I hope after 2 weeks or so the initial craze will be over. Tito☸Dutta 10:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC) I have raised a paid editing concern too, see here Talk:Chennai_Express#Concerns --Tito☸Dutta 12:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:39, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect this page until I am back from holiday. Vandalism and BLP issues. Insulam Simia (talk) 10:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (not sure how long your holiday is) Mark Arsten (talk) 14:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow burning edit war with several IPs adding promo with excessive details and an excessive amount of links to disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 10:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple disruptive IP edits. Acornboy (talk) 10:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism to a frequently protected WP:BLP. STATic message me! 08:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Few reverts have been done recently. 15 August India's Independence day, requesting a 3 day semi protection . Tito☸Dutta 08:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Rhododendrites (talk) 06:13, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Several IPs (likely the same individual) persist in adding negative information without reliable sources. I am One of Many (talk) 05:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:14, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Jeffro77 seeks to initiate another edit war. Based on the article, Cyrus the Great and Jews, I sought to add the repatriation event discussed here on the 537 BC page only to have Jeffro77 maliciously remove it. Please rectify, thank you! —Maxximiliann talk 02:31, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:20, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: the editor in question is trying to insert his religious opinions at various articles. In reference to this article, various sources indicate 538 or 537 for the arrival of the Jews in their homeland. However, a comparison of Josephus and Ezra puts the return in 538. In any case, there is certainly no reason at all for dogmatically insisting on 537 (which is also unsourced at Persian Jews). And there is absolutely no reason to insist that it 'must' be 537 in order to prop up numerological beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses.--Jeffro77 (talk) 03:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've warned Maxximiliann for edit warring - I think ANI is going to be more likely than DRN. Dougweller (talk) 06:09, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ViktorC (talk) 00:10, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: As soon as the protection was lifted, an IP user started to edit the page, even that the the dispute for ACS Politehnica Timişoara short name wasn't resolved (see details here Template talk:Fb team ACS Poli Timişoara). Also, one section was removed without any good reason. Acornboy (talk) 20:40, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I only see one problematic IP since protection has been removed, so I'm not sure reprotection is merited yet. But feel free to ask again if disruption continues. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:23, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: recently speedily deleted due to abuse of multiple accounts. Different editor working up a draft at User:Jmahendran50/sandbox; please compare [9] (esp. access dates of citations).

Declined It's been deleted once and hasn't been recreated, so I'm not sure salting is merited at this point. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:58, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's now been replaced at David_Kiger_(business_executive) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). —rybec 21:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, salted one, but the other hasn't been deleted yet. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all edits for months have been either vandalism or reverts of vandalism. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:54, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection Gave it a month, but the usual cadre of IP's are still making the same annoying "prediction" edits for an awards show not back for eight months. Only one useful IP contrib this go-around. Nate • (chatter) 22:48, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term pending changes Persistent vandalism, predominantly to the box-office earnings, and almost always unsourced. I'd prefer semi-protection, but at least one of the blighters will be autoconfirmed soon, and others may be already. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 23:13, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 23:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and dubious unsourced additions. STATic message me! 20:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: recently speedily deleted, but new draft being worked up in User:Spankaj9852/sandbox looks to me like the work of the same people. —rybec 16:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's been deleted once and hasn't been recreated, so I'm not sure salting is merited at this point. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

15 August 2013

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jamesx12345 19:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  19:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Since mid July, there have been numerous additions of images that violate copyright by IPs and new accounts. Some IPs have contributed positively over this time, so I believe pending changes is more appropriate than semi protection. I am One of Many (talk) 18:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  19:35, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent sockpuppetry from IPs See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Chaosname. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:29, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Favonian.. GedUK  19:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced, mostly false, information about owners and staff of Indonesian football club by Indonesia-based IPs. Previous protection ended a couple of days ago and they've just noticed it's available to edit again. Don't know if a rangeblock would be feasible, or whether it's too wide a range. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 18:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  19:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ips and SPAs changing cited material of the band braking up in varying degrees of disruption. Murry1975 (talk) 18:12, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Changing of date of birth by IPs against the references without any other cite stated. Murry1975 (talk) 18:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes seemed to work last time, so let's try it again. GedUK  19:29, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive new user and IP edits to popular sports facility recently renamed with corporate sponsorship. --Esprqii (talk) 17:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  19:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Countless unsourced vandalism. Koala15 (talk) 16:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  19:22, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. smarojit HD 13:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There really isn't that much in there. Some, perhaps, many good faith though. GedUK  14:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. STATic message me! 16:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:35, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level Vandalism can occur because it is a new article . Please protect it for a short period.--Param Mudgal (talk) 13:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals use this page regularly as their 'playground'. Barry Shukla 12:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by anons. VictoriaGould (talk) 15:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Mark Arsten (talk) 15:22, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Additions of unsourced content or disruptive editing . STATic message me! 14:46, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism and edit warring by IPs. Deli nk (talk) 12:46, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, particularly from 86.172.130.164 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), who has also targetted various other pages relating to London Underground and other railways. Obviously the same IP-hopping vandal as identified at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/86.158.105.84. David Biddulph (talk) 12:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ken Lanci (edit | project page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection: AfC creator has repeatedly submitted this questionable BLP and begged for it to be promoted to article space after ignoring the well reasoned decline reasons including WP:CRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON. Page creator's efforts suggest they are attempting to use Wikipedia to promote the candidate rather than acutally building an encyclopedic article. Hasteur (talk) 12:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for one month. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated deletion of content with citation by IPs. simontcope 08:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism to a biography of a living person. STATic message me! 04:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  10:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback protection: This was just requested, and was marked as done, but was either not done or was undone ([10]). Please redo, this time setting it to a level high enough that regular editors can't re-enable it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback protected I'm not totally sure what went on since feedback changes aren't logged, but right now the protection screen is showing that it's disabled for all users. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: edit war between registered editors, insertion of hoax material —rybec 01:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recurring IP vandalism/an IP user who just can't understand he/she is alone in hisher view and should let the article be. Elliot Wing (talk) 22:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Two parties, only one autoconfirmed, both warring. Warned at each of their talk pages. Both are using article talk. I've reverted to last stable version. Will monitor. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and additions of unsourced content. The page has a very long history of vandalism, unsourced changes and addition of misinformation. Sourov0000 (talk) 01:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There have been quite a number of edits pertaining to changing the spelling of words to another variety of English. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protection Continual addition of non-RS cited personal information to BLP stretching back some time, current edit-warring by Telegraph Totter despite talk page explanation. Thanks. -- Hillbillyholiday talk 00:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please stop Hillybilly from reverting edits and edit-warring with refs that only he deems unfit despite talk page explanation. Thanks. --The Totter 00:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'll consider adding pending changes when full protection expires (if someone reminds me to). Mark Arsten (talk) 00:36, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers, Mark. As it is fully protected I can't remove the non-RS sourced DOB, so could you do that for me please? -- Hillbillyholiday talk 00:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rolled back to pre-edit war version just to be on the safe side as far as BLP is concerned. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow burning edit war with IP adding info with excessive links to disambiguation pages. But also adding copyvio from here what is now removed for the second time. The Banner talk 00:42, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:52, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, as related to unfolding events in Egypt. Plot Spoiler (talk) 00:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:50, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism being made, which serves no purpose. JMHamo (talk) 22:57, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. This was all sparked off by The Last Leg tonight (see also Adam Hills). Black Kite (talk) 23:09, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the past week. Cky2250 (talk) 22:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:09, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This needs to be protected again. Recurring IP vandalism/an IP user who just can't understand he/she is alone in hisher view and should let the article be. Started again as soon as the last protection of the page ended. Elliot Wing (talk) 22:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Attempt to persuade IP failed. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful IP vandalism, please protect . JMHamo (talk) 21:10, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Legoktm (talk) 21:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Currently the subject of a significant political controversy. Aaaccc (talk) , 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

16 August 2013

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting protection for this season due to the infamous Brazilian IP hopping vandal taking their crap onto this season since it's the only one that is left unprotected. Continuous addition of fictitious content. – Recollected • 19:14, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 20:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jamesx12345 16:32, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:35, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued disruptive editing after end of recent protection period. STATic message me! 16:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: IP vandalism, over the last 2 days at least. And repetitive request for semi-protection over the past 2 years seen in the log.Cky2250 (talk) 15:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same exact edits that caused the last page protection started as soon as the protection ended, I suggest making the protectation a lot longer than a couple days. Lady Lotus (talk) 13:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Well, vandalism--disruptive, and edit warring, that's for sure. I've warned this "new" editor, and they'll be blocked if it continues. Drmies (talk) 14:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by IP addresses without talk. Section with citations repeatedly removed and replaced. Wevers2000 (talk) 05:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Wevers2000[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The article has seen 14 moves in the last couple of weeks. I tried to resolve the issue in the talk page but its still on. $oHƎM❊আড্ডা 11:35, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. GedUK  14:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks $oHƎM❊আড্ডা 14:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit warring over the lead sentence on and off since July 29, and which has heated up in the last few days. I think a week or so would be good. Arc de Ciel (talk) 10:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That'll get messy. GedUK  14:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IP (who has IP hopped) keeps vandalising the article. Bidgee (talk) 09:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  14:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated disruptive editing by a dynamic IP address in France for the past few days. Repeatedly adds unverifiable content whilst using Wikipedia and Youtube (both not WP:RS) as citations. Cannot leave a warning on the user's talk page and expect them to receive it, since their IP address keeps changing. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 08:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  14:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we protect this article for at least 6 months? Those IPs from Israel are only jumping from non-protected The Biggest Loser article to another non-protected The Biggest Loser article. They keep on using different IPs, giving them warnings are of no use. Believe me. I have been monitoring them since last year. The Wikipedia Community has done nothing to stop them, except for Drmies‎ who was responsible for protecting these vandalized pages for 6 months or indefinitely. I tried once to bring this up once to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, but no one bothered to answer.

Please hear my call. Short protection won't help. If we can protect other articles (except for the articles in the US version since almost all are being monitored by other users), I think we can stop them. If we can protect all the other articles now, we can't stop or at least halt their activity.

For more information on what article needs protection, see this: The Biggest Loser patrol page. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 13:08, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Drmies (talk) 14:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect due to the high level of IP vandalism caused by a pending transfer to Liverpool. JMHamo (talk) 11:35, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Already done. Drmies (talk) 14:21, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism by IP addresses without talk. Section with citations repeatedly removed and replaced.Nagarjuna198 (talk) 07:44, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  14:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection. Repeated insertion of unsourced content by recently autoconfirmed users. Article has been semiprotected nine times in less than two years. Clearly, this isn't working, and neither would pending changes. However, the most recent spate of problem edits began this month and is related to a flurry of tabloid-type media reports which likely will be limited in duration, so a few weeks of full may well do the trick. Rivertorch (talk) 06:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected I've put a temporary pending changes on as well. I don't see why this won't work assuming that the reviewers don't approve a statement like that without a source. I'd much rather try this first than fully protect, even for a short while. The semi protection is still on, so the edits should only be coming from accounts. Obviously if accounts persist then we can take action against them as individuals. GedUK  14:05, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection could be prudent. Might just be temporary, but Hirsch is asking people to vandalize his Wikipedia article over on Reddit (http://www.reddit.com/r/gravityfalls/comments/1kgq85/i_am_alex_hirsch_creator_of_gravity_falls_ask_me/cbot7p6?context=3). Gobōnobō + c 04:59, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mfield (Oi!) 05:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: two speedy deletions in the past 11 days, with confirmed and suspected sock/meatpuppet activity —rybec 03:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mark Arsten (talk) 04:11, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant and steady stream of unsourced and meaningless edits from IPs. This article has a long history of page protection, and IP vandalism resumes almost immediately after the last protection expires. LBM | TALK TO ME 03:38, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:12, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Article received increased attention, especially with tomorrow's Edit-a-thon. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 23:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent genre warring by IPs has been going on for a while now.

Kznn11 (talk) 20:55, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:33, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of vandalism by IPs and unconfirmed users. Deadbeef 00:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:29, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent unconstructive edits by one or more users using multiple IPs. Edits are pointless and a waste of genuine editor's time. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 00:25, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new accounts, within the past day. —MelbourneStar☆talk 00:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:25, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:50, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:22, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IP edits. —Ryulong (琉竜) 19:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, There's very little vandalism going on there. As far as I can see, the vast chunk are good faith GedUK  19:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Bookgoldentriangletour1 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Spaming even after being indef blocked. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, They've only done it once. Relist if it carries on, or contact the blocking admin and ask them to reblock with talk page access revoked. GedUK  19:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent insourced IP edits and even some (minor) vandalism. -- Lihaas (talk) 22:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:30, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term anon vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:31, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and unsourced content additions, but mostly violations of WP:LEAK (promoting the leak of the album). This article has been protected before, and vandalism shot right back up once the latest protection period ended. Even with PC before it received much more vandalism then positive edits. STATic message me! 19:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:35, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

17 August 2013

Indefinite semi-protection:, repeatedly recreated after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zim (Invader Zim) closed as redirect. Frietjes (talk) 16:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Mark Arsten (talk) 18:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs removing portions biased on POV. Request temporary semi-protect for a few days.Rivertown (talk) 14:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor changes IP and continues to remove portions per their POV. One week block may be needed to start.Rivertown (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent hoaxing by anons adding fluff on a supposed version of the show on Fox. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:17, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nationalist claims vandalism. Some two weeks would be great, currently article is under attack. WhiteWriterspeaks 11:01, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Requesting temporary move protection of last stable title until the dispute settles. . Tito☸Dutta 08:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: HighIntellectual (talk · contribs).. NW (Talk) 14:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jianhui67 Talk 07:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Single IP now blocked. Will monitor. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass amount of vandalism from new accounts and Anon IPs in just one day. Bidgee (talk) 05:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently some IPs have repeatedly replaced the word "dog" with "doge". And other edits were also vandal. Oda Mari (talk) 04:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Userspace to avoid accidental changes by new users in EP, noncontroverisal. Jackson Peebles (talk) 04:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Userspace to avoid accidental changes by new users in EP, noncontroverisal. Jackson Peebles (talk) 04:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Userspace to avoid accidental changes by new users in EP, noncontroverisal. Jackson Peebles (talk) 04:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Userspace to avoid accidental changes by new users in EP, noncontroverisal. Jackson Peebles (talk) 04:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Userspace to avoid accidental changes by new users in EP, noncontroverisal. Jackson Peebles (talk) 04:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Various IPs removing sections for unknown reason. Warnings given. Request 36 hour semi-protect block. Msw1002 (talk) 03:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalism relating to personal life, general BLP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:26, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Reception section is disputed. Many edit states the movie is mixed review, some say negative, some say positive reviews from critics. Either Temp. Pending Changes or Temp. Semi-Protection EuroCarGT 00:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:17, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. King Jakob C2 00:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute, edit warring over the same text by new editor User1481 and existing IP address 99.95.202.174. Binksternet (talk) 00:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring: IP editor 99.101.143.235 (talk · contribs) and new account Financeguy39 (talk · contribs) both edited out the same section [11][12] of the article. —rybec 22:49, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Constant, persistent vandalism has plagued the page. It has to be stopped please. ARTPOPist (talk) 00:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:04, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Page has been plagued by editing tests and vandalism of non-autoconfirmed origin since its creation nearly five years ago. SuperMarioMan 21:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 02:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: repeated recreation with sock-puppet activity. There have been two speedy deletions since June and a draft is being worked up in Airoli/sandbox/Alex Haditaghi (entrepreneur). —rybec 18:11, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No-one's tried to create this in almost a month; unless this is recreated again, protection doesn't seem necessary. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:95.35.61.197 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect this IP talk page. The IP was blocked for a month and is unable to edit any article due to this particular reason. But now the IP had vandalized his IP talk page. Please protect the talk page, or prevent the IP from editing his talk page until his block is lifted. See history of the talk page for details. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 17:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:32, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

18 August 2013

indefinite semi-protect, high-visiblity template which has been a recent spam link target (see this thread). Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 19:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive IP edits. STATic message me! 19:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. STATic message me! 18:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editor warring to include low quality sources to support controversial text. Binksternet (talk) 17:01, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:33, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Haris Abdagic (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 16:43, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. SMS Talk 09:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the edit warring has stopped now. Given that it is a FAC and is being improved, it should at least be watched by an admin. --SMS Talk 10:24, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I would suggest going to WP:AN3 if the reverting continues. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant reverting by IP hopper. Betty Logan (talk) 13:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Betty Logan (talk) 12:39, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 12:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kollision (talk) 08:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:58, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – People still making BLP violations, 2 days after page protection expired. Insulam Simia (talk) 06:18, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one editor made unreferenced edits after protection was lifted, and xe stopped after warnings. Let's see what happens over the next few days before we drop the hammer again. :-) KrakatoaKatie 07:47, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection IP adding unusual, unsourced contributions and edit-warring to keep them in. -- Hillbillyholiday talk

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 07:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopping editor is removing maintenance templates and (at least previously) adding POV material. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:36, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, they have been doing the same at Kumar Suresh Singh, who was an academic colleague, They claim to be a relative of Barun De (see this) and are seemingly B de2002 (talk · contribs) editing while logged out. - Sitush (talk) 07:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both articles were semi'd. KrakatoaKatie 07:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection Content dispute between 2 editors. Already warned of 3RR. 68.119.73.36 (talk) 02:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems pretty crazy to protect the whole article over a wikilink. I'd say blocks make more sense if it doesn't stop. Monty845 04:38, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Both editors have been warned; it's a very slow edit war if you can call it that. Dispute resolution is the next step. KrakatoaKatie 07:58, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced additions/promotional edits. STATic message me! 04:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:57, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection due to disruptive IP editor who has been blocked for bloating the plot summary and failing to engage in discussion. Erik (talk | contribs) 04:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 Week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Per the protection policy, PC isn't available for the sort of general disruption/edit warring/block evasion that is going on there, so had to semi-protect it instead. Monty845 04:43, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism from various IPs. 174.117.31.142 (talk) 22:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive IP hopping editor. STATic message me! 22:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Maybe a week. A changing IP keeps removing Palestine. CMD (talk) 21:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Highly used. Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 18:26, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent edit warring among editors. Jianhui67 Talk 07:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

19 August 2013

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent & Persistent IP Editor vandalism. Enfcer (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long-term vandalism magnet for IPs who constantly change the university's mascot. It goes quiet sometimes, but it's hugely disruptive, and there are only a handful of helpful IP edits. Semi-protection will prohibit the vandalism, and won't have any major drawbacks; it needs to be indefinite because the IP(s) will keep on doing this, as history has shown. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:25, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ok, indefinite it is. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized after again few days after the end of the one month protection. I suggest that the admins protect this for at least six months just like the other articles found here: The Biggest Loser vandalism patrol page. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 19:38, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:32, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. STATic message me! 19:12, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. His religion is constantly being changed from "None (Atheist)" to "Islam". Երևանցի talk 19:08, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Mark Arsten (talk) 20:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and WP:BLP violations right when the previous protection period ended less than a week ago. STATic message me! 18:41, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indef. semi-protection: Constant IP vandalism (see [13]). Quis separabit? 18:14, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, adding unsourced information. Artavasdes (talk) 15:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant IP vandalism, constant adding of unsourced information based on personal biased POV, in addition to personal abusive attacks on multiple editors. EkoGraf (talk) 16:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:32, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article is a biography of a famous actor. It should be semi-protected so that the aricle is safe from vandalism and the article is not tampered by any unregistered user. Also in compliance with biographies of living persons, this article should be protected indefinitely. --Param Mudgal (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)ɫ̩[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of sockpuppetry. Half of the edits since June 24 have been by registered and IP sockpuppets of AndresHerutJaim (Michael Zeev, Elirhann Oraz89, 83.63.236.132, 190.232.74.112, 190.235.229.204 and 83.60.254.71) Sean.hoyland - talk 12:58, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:12, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Very high level of IP, and unconfirmed user vandalism since June Cky2250 (talk) 12:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:09, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and dubious unsourced additions . STATic message me! 12:50, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:05, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IP user. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 10:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, It's only one IP. If it's vandalism report to WP:AIV, if it's edit warring, report to WP:3RRN GedUK  11:19, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term abuse . SFK2 (talk) 12:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user keeps vandalizing the page and had been reverted multiple times by several editors. The user was also blocked once for three days for edit warring. The page protection would help maintaining the page. - Vivvt (Talk) 11:57, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by newly registred users, probably socks of a blocked user. Jingiby (talk) 11:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I am requesting that you please overlook the usual protocol and protect this article indefinitely as it has been continually vandalised for the last couple of months by one or more IP users. This page has been semi-protected numerous times in the past couple of months and each the time the protection has expired, the vandalism has resumed so I am asking that you really consider protecting this page indefinitely. JayJ47 (talk) 08:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One last try before indef. Maybe in a year they'll have got bored/grown up. GedUK  11:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: recently created twice —rybec 08:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Looks like a notable topic might be created by some valid user Alex Bakharev (talk) 08:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP-heavy edit warring ([14][15][16][17]). Novangelis (talk) 04:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent edit warring after warning. Novangelis (talk) 05:46, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Alex Bakharev (talk) 07:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism due to talking about his WP page on his TV show.. please protect. JMHamo (talk) 08:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex Bakharev (talk) 08:21, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Probably best to protect it for a long time. Insulam Simia (talk) 07:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex Bakharev (talk) 07:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Someone is continually adding extra verses about suicide to the quoted nursery rhyme. Was reverted before, but an IP user simply reverted it. Kevin Corbett (talk) 23:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:50, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant dubious unsourced additions since end of recent protection period. STATic message me! 03:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continuing position-warring by socks. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 03:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:46, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and unsourced content additions . STATic message me! 03:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:50, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. STATic message me! 02:58, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations/vandalism right after the end of the recent protection. STATic message me! 02:58, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:44, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently being vandalized by two IPs'. I dream of horses (T) @ 02:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Downgrade to semi-protection: Only 4500 transclusions, so not that high-risk. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 14:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Seems we have a edit war going on about the track list on this page for a game that isn't even out yet. There have been 99 edits alone today. Whispering 21:37, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:25, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection constant addition by IPs of a modern fictional character (Rory Williams) to the article on ancient Roman centurions. Constantine ✍ 16:32, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:48, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:47, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
fixed comment. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:33, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

20 August 2013

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. -- L o g X 19:14, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism and additions of dubious unsourced content. STATic message me! 18:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of sockpuppetry. A significant proportion of edits to the article have been by registered and IP sockpuppets of AndresHerutJaim (e.g. SILtmediaup, Elirhann Oraz89, Michael Zeev, IranitGreenberg, Beravildi, Cajollosok, 157.92.4.71, 190.235.84.198, Milwofull, Chaccaputoto and many more). The most recent edits are by a meatpuppet who left the instructions they had received in the edit (see User_talk:109.64.160.175#Meatpuppetry and User_talk:Elockid#checkuserblock-account). The last protection expired on 19 June 2013 and the sock/meat puppetry has continued. Sean.hoyland - talk 18:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. -- L o g X 18:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Fiddle Faddle 18:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mark Arsten (talk) 18:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:OR added repeatedly to controversial film releasing on August 23. Request semi-protection till August 26. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 18:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: The problem with this template is noted here: Template_talk:Upgradestiki#Changing_something. Everyone thinks the section is on their talk, but really it's in the template; 6 mistaken edits in 12 hours. If I could go back in time, I wouldn't have included the section in the template, but would have the included a new section along with template when used on the talk pages. But I think rather than going back and disturbing everyone's talk pages again with the change, it would be kinder just to fully protect page so that at least non-admins don't continue the mistake. Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 18:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Mark Arsten (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Mark. --Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 18:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit-warring by socks adding unsourced information. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 16:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much Mark. Best regards. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 17:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Sudden influx of persistent vandals. Kolbasz (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SmillanIsCanon for all of the diffs with regards to this request. MM (Report findings) (Past espionage) 16:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for three days by User:Floquenbeam. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Users who are being notified of stale AfC articles are attempting to write on the talk page of the Bot account that is notifying them. I request that this page be fully protected so that the users will read the instructions (and come to User talk:Hasteur) to ask the questions. Hasteur (talk) 15:54, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 17:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:HasteurBot (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: Users who are being notified of stale AfC articles are attempting to write on the talk page of the Bot account that is notifying them. I request that this page be fully protected so that the users will read the instructions (and come to User talk:Hasteur) to ask the questions. Hasteur (talk) 15:53, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 17:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. STATic message me! 15:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – high levels of IP vandalism. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 13:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – high levels of IP vandalism. SFK2 (talk) 13:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shirt58 (talk) 13:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced episode titles and dates by two Australian IPs who clearly do not understand WP:RS. Network has yet to release any episode details beyond premiere date, editor relying on unreliable source that is likely using "spoiler" sites for episode information. This is one IP using their home computer and cell phone to force edit. Show has a very active fan base in Australia. Needs long enough semi to protect until network releases episode details, probably around September 1. --Drmargi (talk) 11:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism since end of recent protection period . STATic message me! 05:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 06:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. SFK2 (talk) 10:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Mufka. KrakatoaKatie 11:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, started earlier today. Edgepedia (talk) 06:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 06:52, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of sockpuppetry. A significant proportion of edits to the article since May have been by registered and IP sockpuppets of AndresHerutJaim (190.225.184.10, 37.15.30.241, Asalkan, Cønffucius, Elirhann Oraz89, Sheilub and IranitGreenberg). Sean.hoyland - talk 06:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after recent protection has expired. Suggestion is to extend protection for 6 months like the other pages found here: User:Renzoy16/The Biggest Loser vandalism patrol page. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 05:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP, based edit war. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page has been repeatedly vandalized by Hog1983, who would not be able to edit it if it were semi protected since his account is too new. Jinkinson (talk) 00:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP editor will not wait for consensus on talk page discussion or other editors show up, basically showing ownership of article to the point of demand I create another article and other behavioral problems. Spshu (talk) 22:21, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have also requested other editors to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject American television#Tribune Entertainment/Studios. Spshu (talk) 22:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Consider the Edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:01, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of extraneous formatting and addition of unnecessary info. This article has been plagued since May by a dynamic IP in the 108.25 range who keeps making unnecessary edits of the same style. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will reprotect for longer if problems continue upon expiry. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – for presistant vandalism and/or unsourced info. Digifan23 (talk) 00:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for three months by User:Salvidrim!. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, didn't know this was at RfPP or I'd have tagged it as done myself! :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 02:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page gets vandalised on a daily basis by IPs. Samwalton9 (talk) 23:41, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 02:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spate of IP vandalism. Please revert unsourced crap and semi-protect. Andreas JN466 22:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have calmed down again; influx was related to a trending Twitter topic. Perhaps better to keep it open and just keep an eye on it. Andreas JN466 01:53, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Just to be on the safe side since there were a lot of problems today. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Constant vandalism over genre changes that change their genre to "deathcore" despite the fact that they're not a deathcore band at all and they're another genre known as "slam death metal". The sources on the article claim this and there's constant wars with the genre so please protect it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.134.199 (talk)

temporary PC1 or Semi. Looks like a few IP's edit warring as well. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 21:23, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Constantly vandalised by the IPs -- L o g X 20:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. given vandalism started so soon after protection lifting Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you increase the protection period? -- L o g X 20:32, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If that is necessary once the protection expires, place another request here. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:40, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remove protection: It is not a highly visible template. 76.226.127.190 (talk) 02:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you asked the protecting admin, User:JamesBWatson, if he's willing to unprotect? Mark Arsten (talk) 03:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, Per Mark Arsten above. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:41, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

21 August 2013

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock activity and continuing vandalism. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 20:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:50, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi - Protection: Sir/Maa'm, This article should be indefinitely Semi - Protected in compliance with the biography on living persons also It is a biography on the Life of the famous actor Akshay Kumar and there are high chances of Vandalism.--Param Mudgal (talk) 18:07, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Indefinite period. High level of IP vandalism. -- L o g X 15:05, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Some who would be blocked by semi are not vandalizing. Today's IP problem is same IP on many articles, handle as a user problem not article. DMacks (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:42, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:55, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection (or maybe full?). Edit-warring by several independent IPs who refused my invitation to discuss on talkpage against multiple named accounts over sourcing requirements vs obviousness. DMacks (talk) 06:53, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: has been indefinitely semi protected since June 2011. see no reason why this should continue. any vandals will be long gone.LibStar (talk) 04:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Mark Arsten (talk) 17:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – It is being recreated by a self identified employee. Fiddle Faddle 17:07, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Non-stop unconstructive IP edits/persistent vandalism. Having pending changes kind of makes it tedious to reject all of them. Better to just have it semi-protected and make them go through the edit request process. STATic message me! 16:05, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed PC Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:12, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Going with semi since I don't see too many helpful IP edits. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:50, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This is a WP:BLP problem. An anonymous editor roaming through a group of TMobile United Kingdom IP addresses is constantly re-inserting material without a source. I've tried discussing this on the talk page but the anon refuses to engage in a discussion. Each IP address is different but they're all coming from the same geographic location and same ISP. And here we are. AMFMUHFVHF90922 (talk) 06:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Frequency is still quite low, even if they're pretty well the only edits it's had recently. I'd rather try pending changes at this point. GedUK  11:12, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WP:ROUGH#Criteria_for_semi-protection says that, on average, only 5% of edits on Wikipedia are vandalism. But here, over the past few years, far more than 5% of IP edits to this page have been problematic. IPs have indulged in three harmful acts: vandalism, spamming, and COI editing. Since the problem began years ago, please semi-protect for at least a couple of years. P.S. The page also cites zero sources. I wonder if the subject is actually notable. Cheers, —Unforgettableid (talk) 02:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There hasn't been any vandalism this summer, so I'm not sure that protection is merited at this point. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:53, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The only good edits this summer were made by an autoconfirmed user. :) If a page is rarely edited, but many of the edits it does get are destructive, then why not semi-protect or pending-changes-protect? Cheers, —Unforgettableid (talk) 03:50, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. WadeSimMiser (talk) 23:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined As it's no longer TFA, I suspect the vandalism will drop off sharply. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:51, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Since I created the article over two years ago, there has been quite a large number of IP addresses vandalizing it, and this isn't going to ever stop. Just look through the history and you'll see cluebot alone has reverted vandalism quite a number of times, along with many reverts by various editors like me. Do to how many edits are vandalism and reverts of vandalism over a considerable period of time, please make the protection permanent. Dream Focus 02:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the past 50 edits, 17 have been reverts, 7 by a bot, 10 by people. Dream Focus 02:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's start with this and see how it goes. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:55, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Last time you protected it [18] didn't last that long. Look at the history of the past 500 or 1000 edits. Is there any way to automatically count how many times the word "revert" appears? Its quite a large percentage of all edits. Dream Focus 03:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just noticed this page after it was brought to WP:BLPN - you could fill a book with the amount of IP vandalism and unsourced statements going on here. It was protected for a week back in May, but when that protection ended the IP editors started messing around immediately, so I think a longer lock's in order this time. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 23:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 00:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes level 1 protection This page is already protected. It'll be better if it is changed to Pending changes level 1 protection -- L o g X 21:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you asked the protecting admin, Casliber (talk · contribs) if he's willing to modify it? Mark Arsten (talk) 23:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done ok, happy to give it a whirl. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. STATic message me! 22:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one wek, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jamesx12345 22:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Reddit's newest plaything. Here is the thread. A few levelheaded redditors always attempt to appeal to sanity, but it never works. --Moralis (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for three days by User:DragonflySixtyseven. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Looking at the last 500 edits, about half are vandalism/vandalism reverts. There is currently an editor who is vandalizing, and are bound to be more judging from the history. Severe long-term disruption. Surfer43_¿qué_pasa? 20:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's start with this and see how it goes. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The article may have validity, but a pause in repeated creation is needed to allow the creators time to think. Fiddle Faddle 21:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Redalert2fan (talk) 21:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Bookgoldentriangletour1 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – spaming even after being indef blocked. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

22 August 2013

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – vanity page. Fiddle Faddle 20:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Bishonen | talk 21:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jamesx12345 17:41, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 21:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – unsettled name. – S. Rich (talk) 14:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
User:David Gerard reverted me. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:Being Repeatedly edited by IP users. Rakhie.urs (talk) 11:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. STATic message me! 18:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Already previously requested and denied earlier today, but levels of edit warring have increased significantly since. —me_and 17:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for 3 days, to cover the weekend. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent re-addition of schoolcruft. editors won't talk . Gtwfan52 (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Sir/Ma'am, This page should be indefinitely semi protected in compliance with the biographies of living persons policy of wikipedia. There is a risk of persistent vandalism for this page as the article is of a famous bollywood actor. Also there is controversial information on this page. Param Mudgal (talk) 10:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)--[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. WP:BLP doesn't require a page to be protected. There's very little recent history of disruptive edits on this page. GedUK  12:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Some vandalism and/or dispute by IP and registered users alike. George Ho (talk) 07:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  12:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: There has been a lot of controversy surrounding Suburban Express and the page has repeatedly been edited by sockpuppets associated with Suburban Express.Gulugawa (talk) 06:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I can't see any evidence since the current protection started. GedUK  12:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Someone added back "The", violating the decision made in the talk page. George Ho (talk) 06:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined That was a decision based on one person's opinion. Now a second person is involved, the consensus process needs to start again. GedUK  11:27, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – While most of the "Controversy & criticism" section is properly sourced, IPs have repeatedly tried to put in certain content related a contestant's sarcasim about child pornography that is spun in such a way as to be a BLP violation. It is a pretty serious violation (trying to erroneously connect a living person to supporting child pornography) and the IPs seem to keep trying to add it. Need a protection for now to see if that will discontinue. Maybe for 48 or 72 hours?. Singularity42 (talk) 03:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I'm only requesting a short protection because the content on certain parts of this show are constantly being updated (due to the nature of the show), and some of the IPs have been helpful. So I'm hoping only a very short protection time is required. Singularity42 (talk) 03:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Regular additions of unsourced (and not consistent) future episode titles and similar information (appear to be from unreliable wikias and tumblrs) for about a week with no sign of stopping. Reliable sources will likely be available in a couple of weeks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High-visibility due to link from main page. —me_and 14:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from various IP editors. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 14:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Alex Bakharev (talk) 09:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandals keep blanking the page. --. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It took just 9 hours for the IP to return after the de-protection and add his promo again/continue his disruptive editing. The Banner talk 12:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP nonsensical edits. Jingiby 11:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Solely promotions, but created by different users. A little salt helps pizza taste better. Fiddle Faddle 10:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Oddly enough, I thought this was going to be about a politcal party. Kinda disappointed now. GedUK  12:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: IP edit warring - page was semi-protected for a week, but war restarted once this was removed. simontcope 10:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There seems to be too much traffic to article at the moment for PC protection to be very effective. The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 06:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. PC removed. GedUK  12:00, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Subject of article is currently a Google doodle and is drawing a spate of IP activity, predominantly nonconstructive. Safiel (talk) 04:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Return of persistent IP-hopping vandalism following expiration of previous protection. Fat&Happy (talk) 03:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move-unprotection: Consensus at Talk:Chris Brown (American entertainer) suggests that a move is to be performed, but since this page is move-protected, I am unable to do so. Regards. — ΛΧΣ21 03:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Will reprotect when you're done. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Armbrust The Homunculus 12:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent attempts to add unverifiable information to the article (example) despite requests from multiple users not too. At least on anon considerably in breach of 3RR. --Jasca Ducato (talk) 08:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Alex Bakharev (talk) 09:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 07:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Alex Bakharev (talk) 09:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP violations from multiple IPs. Gobōnobō + c 02:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Stumbled across this page, semi protected since 2011.. Perhaps it's time to unprotect or downgrade to PC1?. -Ryan 04:34, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Mark Arsten (talk) 18:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject recently wrote of experience with sexual harassment; anonymous editor(s) attempting to fill in gaps about third parties with information obtained through social media. Nmillerche (talk) 01:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. Surfer43_¿qué_pasa? 23:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Player is rumored to be transferring to Twente. An IP has already added the unconfirmed information and many will probably add more. GoPurple'nGold24 22:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The article on this troubled company is seeing incessant whitewashing attempts from IPs and new accounts belonging to the Morning227 paid editor / sockfarm. MrOllie (talk) 22:19, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for one month. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for two weeks by User:Connormah. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous edit warring. Transcendence (talk) 20:44, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Let me know if problems continue. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:53, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring initiated by User:Net cust, a possible sockpuppet of User:Dgenx 214 who also engage in re-adding his list of results in the article, even after being warned that he violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE several times and just being ignored. -WayKurat (talk) 13:15, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by User:ItsZippy. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:57, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Much like the 2 above. Is this a very controversial subjeect matter? i wouldn't have thought

Have you asked the protecting admin, Drmies (talk · contribs), if he's willing to unprotect early? Mark Arsten (talk) 18:05, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Given the continued activity of DavidYork71, I see no reason to. Drmies (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I agree. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:47, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

23 August 2013

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP's, semi protect/protect page to prevent vandalism.  A m i t  웃   18:39, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:39, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs keep adding unsourced/non-notable info to the page. Paris1127 (talk) 16:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer speculation. Hammer1980·talk 16:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by User:Mattythewhite for one week. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:34, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High levels of IP edits adding unconfirmed casting additions, when reliable sources have only attributed said actors as being in talks. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:34, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:09, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated anonymous IP personal attacks, and via sockpuppetry over the past few years on both User page and User Talk page.War (talk) 15:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 19:07, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism or additions of unsourced content. STATic message me! 15:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry attacks by a blocked POV warrior. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 15:21, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 19:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/English Patriot Man). Saddhiyama (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:57, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism over the past few days by supporters of a rival football team under numerous IP addresses, possibily an attack by a message board or forum. BillyBatty (talk) 14:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There have been so many changes to the plot summary in the last few days, it is hard to tell what is going on; article should be protected until consensus is reached on talk page; editing has been very contentious all week. The Old JacobiteThe '45 13:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like IPs are a big part of the problem, let me know if disruption continues without them. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:43, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Banning policy (edit | project page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry by a blocked IP, who has hopped to various other IPs. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 18:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Kiko4564 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Person is blocked for using an IP to vandalism at the same time an ip is posting pics on this page. semi protection needed to stop the fun. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 18:39, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP repeatedly adding names which have previously been suppressed because of privacy concerns. There is no reliable or verifiable source for this information. The innuendo directed at the relatives of the named person who is still living may be distressing to them.Donde1960 (talk) 14:07, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: This needs move-protection in the light of recent events. Also, its redirects, like List of charges against Bradley Manning and List of charges against Chelsea Manning, need move-protection. George Ho (talk) 05:19, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There's no history of move warring, and certainly nothing like the conflagration that's going on on the BLP. This moved from charges against Bradley, then Chelsea, and now Manning. No history of any of those being undone after the current position. GedUK  11:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect.. too much unsourced IP edits that need reverting being made. JMHamo (talk) 01:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, There's good faith, and good IP edits as well GedUK  11:33, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Attempted spamming of an external Web site by a series of IPs and throwaway accounts has continued for almost a month. I think a semi for about that long is in order, as the page gets very few constructive edits. Deor (talk) 13:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by IP-hopping editor. Toccata quarta (talk) 12:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: repeated recreation —rybec 07:09, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. GedUK  11:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This has already been temporarily protected a couple of times but every time the protection expires, the user comes in and inserts the attacks again. Recommend longer-term semiprotection to avoid letting such edits stand at a time when none of the page watchers are able to revert them. There aren't any productive non-autoconfirmed edits going on that long-term semiprotection would inhibit. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:43, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:54, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing/vandalism and dubious unsourced additions. STATic message me! 01:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:38, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same editor with multiple IPs has been adding bizarre, embarrassing, defamatory content about low visibility Canadian musician Kathryn Calder for years, sometimes with long distances in between. Kathryn Calder has been indefinitely protected - please do the same for her album article. Thank you [19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32]. CutOffTies (talk) 18:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm hesitant to protect since it has only been vandalized twice in the past two months. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

level 1 pending changes: Persistent editing, mostly by IPs, to remove the solution of this puzzle. Has been semi-prot before. Mangoe (talk) 21:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:57, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of POV editing from IPs. Forcing them to register would make it easier to track what is happening. Jamesx12345 21:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined That's not IPs as far as I can see, but one static IP, and it's just been blocked (I blocked it myself). I'm watching the article, but feel free to file another request if I should miss further IP disruption. Bishonen | talk 21:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated style changes in violation of WP:ERA (as confirmed in discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Request_for_rule_interpretation:_WP:ERA). . Hertz1888 (talk) 20:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. two weeks by User:Vsmith. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Has received repeated vandalism due to the theatrical release of the documentary Blackfish.

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This article is the subject of heightened emotions at present. There are strong WP:BLPCRIME issues with the naming of arrested suspects, and a number of new and IP only editors at work in the article. Correctness is more important than being 100% up to date here. We are not a newspaper. Fiddle Faddle 21:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:49, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs, probably the same person who's known for destroying content in other articles as well[33], have repeatedly destroyed references, reference formatting, proper use of templates for dates, an entry in the version table, etc.. At least one of the used IP addresses were already blocked.[34]

Please protect the page for one or two weeks. I did a lot of work to improve the article by finding sources for unreferenced claims etc. and improve the article's style. Seeing that work repeatedly destroyed is demotivating. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 21:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many unhelpful IP edits which are purely vandalism. JMHamo (talk) 21:27, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism going on in the past 48 hours or so. TCN7JM 20:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs, probably the same person, have repeatedly pushed what it seems to be his/her dog's image. See Talk:Tosa (dog). Oda Mari (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ginsuloft (talk) 22:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:42, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism during periods of non-protection. I'd imagine it will only get worse as the NFL season begins. aqwfyj Talk/Contribs 22:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:43, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism following appearance on the front page of Reddit.

Already protected. for one week by User:Spencer. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism/dubious unsourced additions. . STATic message me! 21:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. —Ryulong (琉竜) 18:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect due to a high level of IP vandalism caused by his first goal for Tottenham Hotspur. JMHamo (talk) 16:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, What vandalism? He did score, finding a source and adding it would fix it. There's potential need to protect if the infobox goal count keeps being 'corrected', but that'snot happened much yet. GedUK  20:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

24 August 2013

Semi-protection: Continued BLP violations from ip's - part of a large-scale problem with related articles (Talk:Humaima_Malick#Note_on_the_edit-warring_by_the_ip.27s_and_new_accounts). I don't know how long we should go this time. I don't think that we need to make it permanent yet. --Ronz (talk) 19:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - ok, will give this a bit of time now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: part of large-scale BLP violations from ip's and new editors. (Talk:Humaima_Malick#Note_on_the_edit-warring_by_the_ip.27s_and_new_accounts) --Ronz (talk) 19:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. until 11 Aug 2014 Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Additions of unsourced content or blatant vandalism. STATic message me! 19:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. let's try this - editing from accounts so folks can discuss properly and see who wants what...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:55, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – The article just came off of semi-protection and one of the IPs again introduced content about a past criminal record for which no reliable sources are provided. Perhaps a longer period of pending changes might work better. I am One of Many (talk) 16:34, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ok, let's try PC and see if this leads to better collaboration. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The article has been semi-protected since August of 2008, except when it was part of the Pending Changes trial. In its protected form, it does not seem to have had any recent major disputes or edit warring. I think an unprotection on a trial basis is warranted; indefinite protection should be lifted from time to time to gauge whether protection is still necessary, and it seems to me that after five years and with no particular reason to indicate it is still required, the time is ripe. Knight of Truth (talk) 16:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected alright then...let's give this a go, but can folks please notify here if problems recur (which is not unlikely). Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Content issue, some addition of unsourced content. EuroCarGT 15:11, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It only seems to be one IP, I'd suggest seeking sanctions against it if disruption continues. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:16, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Today is the 50th anniversary, and I suspect that there will be some vandalism, just for today. buffbills7701 14:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:16, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've warned both of them as well. If they carry straight on again afterwards, let me know and I'll block. The quality of that lead paragraph is terrible, irregardless of the content. GedUK  16:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: editing war over a content dispute —rybec 07:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It seems to be one editor who's constantly removing the section. They've been warned, if they carry on, report them. Better to block them than the article. GedUK  16:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism and dubious unsourced additions after recent end of page protection period. . STATic message me! 16:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Tito☸Dutta 15:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP/vandalism. SFK2 (talk) 12:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi Protection: Apparently the 24 hour protection which was applied didn't convince our socker problem to back off. Two new accounts have shown up doing the same vandalism as before User:Floquenbeam protected it. We need longer protection to shut this socker down. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SmillanIsCanon for evidence. MM (Report findings) (Past espionage) 12:02, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi'd for a month. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected (for the bot). Mark Arsten (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 11:48, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 11:51, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP user (94.180.X.X) changes sourced content (falsification) and does not use talk page to discuss his/her changes and collaborate with other editors. A temporary protection will be helpful for this article, because IP user does not attend to our edit summaries. Zyma (talk) 03:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  16:05, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, new editors are constantly diminishing the article quality. 149.254.250.175 (talk) 12:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  16:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was semi-protected Feb-Aug 2013 for persistent IP vandalism. Protection was lifted Aug 4. Persistent IP vandalism has resumed. Page gets avg 1000-1500 views per day. — Maile (talk) 11:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 11:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized frequently since the last protection of this page expired.I suggest protecting it for a bit longer this time. Lsmll 10:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ChakaKongLet's talk about it 06:18, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Single IP now blocked. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:56, 24 August 2013 (UTC) Actually, another IP was making some bad edits. Due to nature of vandalism and BLP, 1 week. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive dubious unsourced additions, and vandalism to an article cover under the WP:BLP policy. . STATic message me! 05:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent addition of hoax and rumoured future works. Adabow (talk) 03:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection. There is a long-term problem on this article – going back several years – with one editor, Otto Placik (talk · contribs), adding and removing material in violation of WP:COI, several content policies and MEDRS. Full protection would be appreciated to stop the reverting and to encourage him to use the talk page. Discussion at Talk:Labiaplasty#A request (to which, at the time of writing this request, he has not responded). SlimVirgin (talk) 04:47, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected done - although indef, am happy for any other admin to unprotect if discussion productive. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:51, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continuing disruption. Powered by Tabloid Pulsa® (talk) 03:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 Months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Monty845 03:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and dubious unsourced additions along with BLP violations. STATic message me! 01:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. WadeSimMiser (talk) 23:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by User:Elockid. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent violations of the BLP policy upon end of previous protection period. STATic message me! 01:59, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Keeps inputting a link on hoax article, and continues to vandalize by this user via IP adresses. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 01:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs removing content w/o explanation, adding unsourced content in place. Paris1127 (talk) 21:42, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism as soon as previous protection period ended. STATic message me! 01:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, dubious unsourced additions and disruptive editing. . STATic message me! 01:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection, persistenly untagged by IPs. (Hairhorn (talk · contribs) editing while logged out) 67.230.146.50 (talk) 00:55, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: recent repeated recreation--see [35] —rybec 00:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 01:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism --Rushton2010 (talk) 00:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:47, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: recent recreation at Waterfield Group (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) —rybec 21:41, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 01:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Ethnically-motivated edits by IP and brand-new editor (probably same person) changing ethnic information with source, despite warnings from other editors. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, It's one IP, and one editor. Better to take action against them individually. Report to WP:3RRN for edit warring. GedUK  21:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: nasty and utterly unacceptable racist attacks from User:BlackApe, identified by blocking admin as User:Zapatancas contibs who is located in Madrid, same as this new racist ip, request 1 year protection. Nobody reverted in 2 hours and I cant be watchjing 24/7. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 23:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 01:40, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: recent repeated recreation —rybec 23:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Darian_Kovacs&action=info

Creation protected indefinitely. Bishonen | talk 23:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Following a newspaper report of a hoax edit in the article, IPs have been trying to keep the hoax. Request temporary protection for a week until this blows over. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:09, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 23:30, 23 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. tdkocher (talk) 19:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  21:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant dubious unsourced additions as soon as previous protection period ended. STATic message me! 19:19, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

25 August 2013

Semi-protection: Constant addition of unsourced or poorly-sourced information that also has some copyvio concerns. It isn't encyclopedic, or constructive. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:09, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Level 4

Early Adopter | Please advise who my mentor is for full protection. Kiwanis2015 (talk) 14:49, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done malformed request. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:58, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive activity by iP users. Rakhie.urs (talk)

Declined. Both URLs redirect to the same page. Stop edit warring over it. (It's also an unconventional way of sourcing something.)--Bbb23 (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous forging of statistics from the beginning of the month by IP user/users. Oleola (talk) 14:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected —Tom Morris (talk) 18:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Numerous occurrences of vandalism by unregistered users, could be prevented by using pending changes. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 13:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP edits removing large blocks of referenced information, claiming it is wrong without backing. Chubbles (talk) 03:58, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:16, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

'Indefinite semi-protection: In the last 50 edits made, 10 have been "revert"s and 5 "undid"s. Its a regular problem with vandalism there. If you look at the past history, this is a constant problem over a considerable period of time. Dream Focus 16:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This is impossible to control. So many socks blanking the lead section. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 15:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (by another administrator)--Bbb23 (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since its creation, only four edits have not been vandalism. The rest is my struggle with vandalism. . Codename Lisa (talk) 15:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 15:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – user recreates and just needs discouragement. Fiddle Faddle 12:34, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 12:41, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This place is an utter mess. Temporary protection won't work either; IPs will just continue adding non-notable/redlinked additions after it expires. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 11:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 12:41, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent inclusion of extraordinary claims by user with 2.186.x.x IPs. Frequently identified as vandalism by many reverting users due to the level of disruptiveness. A source for the claims has been requested many times. Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 06:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping copyvio spam. Elizium23 (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Inputting a link hoax article eventhe said article is suspected as a hoaxand is in proposed deletion. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 05:12, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gr8adithya. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 14:14, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There has been 106 edits to the track listing today, most is from IP's could we perhaps get a page protect until the game comes out on October 1st?. Whispering 02:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it's largely from IPs then only semi-protection should be necessary?--Launchballer 03:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My bad sorry let me edit that. Whispering 04:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of editors change the "from" information from Putney to Brixton despite reliable sources explicitly saying from Putney. I'm pretty sure a Brixton rapper is a type of rapper, and not any particular indication that the rapper is actually from Brixton. Launchballer 01:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. SMS Talk 22:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Being edited repeatedly by ip users. Rakhie.urs (talk) 18:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel (talk) 21:37, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:47, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel (talk) 21:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: was moved to Exosite (biology) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) when now-deleted article Exosite (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)/Exosite (organization) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was created —rybec 17:34, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - not sure why this needs protection? Never had a history of move-wars or anything such, and isn't a disputed topic. Daniel (talk) 21:43, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: recently created twice under the two different titles —rybec 17:28, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - it was created at one title, then moved by the author, then deleted at the second title. So it's only been created once. If it keeps re-occuring then feel free to relist. Daniel (talk) 21:40, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Various IP's and new editors adding unflattering nickname. NeilN talk to me 20:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the additions of non-encyclopedic content are from a large number of different IP's and new accounts, semi-protection is the only realistic option. Daniel (talk) 21:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:TTN (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Unprotection: It's currently move protected, and I'd like to archive it. TTN (talk) 23:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done no problemo. welcome back. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This template seems to have been protected back in 2008. I think five years should have been plenty for whatever the issue was to have resolved itself and I am requesting that the protection on this template be reduced to semi-protected so as I can edit it. I had started to put in an edit request when I noticed the extended duration of the protection for an infobox and figured I would try this route first so I can just edit it myself. Thanks. Technical 13 (talk) 15:40, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There are over 10,000 transclusions, so I think that this qualifies as a high-risk template. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking a moment to review my request Mark. Off to submit my edit request now. :) Technical 13 (talk) 17:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

26 August 2013

Semi-protection: High level of sockpuppetry/meatpuppetry. A significant proportion of edits to the article have been by IP sockpuppets and meatpuppets of AndresHerutJaim including the 109.64.160.175 meatpuppet who left the instructions they had received in the edit elsewhere (see User_talk:109.64.160.175#Meatpuppetry. Sean.hoyland - talk 20:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit-warring by IP socks of indef topic-banned user . Athenean (talk) 19:59, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – too many vandalism on this article, need a pending changes review. — иz нίpнόp ʜᴇʟᴘ! 19:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and dubious unsourced additions. The previous protection ended a few days ago. STATic message me! 17:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs promoting a weird very-fringe-POV Turkic agenda. Constantine ✍ 09:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for four days by User:Anna Frodesiak. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I didn't see this request. I have had the page watchlisted. The dynamic IP seems to be the problem, so maybe a range block is in order. I'll leave that to others to decide. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:51, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That might be a good idea, I'll look into it. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Mark Arsten (talk) 20:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The socks are back. Semiprotection of Insurgency in the Preševo Valley was effective but socks have just shifted their attention to a new article. bobrayner (talk) 15:51, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

semi repeated blanking of uncomplimentary, but relevant and well-sourced, content by a morphing IP. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:58, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Repeated insertion of poorly-sourced and/or subjective information regarding the subject. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:14, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – too many fans refusing to accept that Richie Sambora left the band. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 10:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 15:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent removal of well sourced content, especially about his son's suicide, by a number of editors over a period of time. This is not going to stop any time soon, I'm afraid. Yintan  10:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs promoting a weird very-fringe-POV Turkic agenda. Constantine ✍ 09:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Into the Rift (talk) 08:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Mark Arsten (talk) 15:33, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by numerous socks (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mig33_(It's_fun!_Are_you?) using article for promotional reasons. Flat Out let's discuss it 06:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:31, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. STATic message me! 06:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article, and its main article have been the target of a long-term and persistent campaign to corrupt episode airdates. If an indefinite page protection is not reasonable, I respectfully request a long-term page protection. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (edit | project page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Off-site canvassing has resulted in the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#Survey being derailed by meat puppetry. Some assistance is needed please. Betty Logan (talk) 02:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've not done this lightly, and I've created a page in my userspace for legitimate IP comments. But I agree that the IP !voting, whether being done by 1 user hopping addresses or multiple canvassed users, is disrupting our decision making process. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:Persistent vandalism – Page text is being consistently deleted by a non-confirmed user. Cap020570 (talk) 02:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - because it's one user, a better course of action would be to seek them being blocked, either now or when they break 3RR/edit warring policy. Daniel (talk) 08:14, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A seemingly endless chain of IPs pushing POV language and whitewashing info from the lead/infobox.  Mbinebri  talk ← 01:57, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:48, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being attacked by IPs' and non-confirmed users. I dream of horses (T) @ 02:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 Days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Monty845 02:51, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent IP vandalism. 1966batfan (talk) 01:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Persistent additions of unsourced claims that Vinter (who performs as Savant) has Aspergers and/or is a savant. This has been going on pretty much since the article was created. . Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:20, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Mark Arsten (talk) 01:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: Hello. Unfortunately, this page is vulnerable to many users who continue to add irrelevant and unsourced material persistently, even though it is removed. There aren't many editors on this page to watch out for the rogue edits, so I am thus requesting that in order to make the page stays reliable that a protection is added to this page. Thanks. C. Chip123456 21:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see only a few instances in the last month of unsourced info; plus, earlier, I see lots of constructive IP editing. As such, more harm than good would be done by restricting IP editors. If the problem gets worse, feel free to re-report. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Deliberate addition of hoaxed info about a supposed American version of the show on FOX. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Full protection seems unnecessary. Gamaliel (talk) 23:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 21:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Gamaliel (talk) 23:58, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All edits for the past two weeks have been IP vandalism or the reversion thereof. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – persistent new user section blanking and misleading edit summaries implying it was valid. Part of some sort of Canadian Cadet article whitewashing campaign?. Fiddle Faddle 17:29, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. You've reported this to SPI. The disruption has been minimal (IP already blocked). If it continues before the report is acted upon, re-report here or to my talk page. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – persistent new user section blanking and misleading edit summaries implying it was valid. Part of some sort of Canadian Cadet article whitewashing campaign?. Fiddle Faddle 17:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. You've reported this to SPI. The disruption has been minimal (IP already blocked). If it continues before the report is acted upon, re-report here or to my talk page. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP section blanking and misleading edit summaries implying it was valid. Fiddle Faddle 17:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. IP blocked one week.Bbb23 (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP section blanking and misleading edit summaries implying it was valid. Fiddle Faddle 17:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. IP blocked one week.Bbb23 (talk) 17:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

27 August 2013

Temporary semi-protection: For a period of one week. -- L o g X 15:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 20:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please see previous semi-protection logs. Persistent IP-hopping editor adding content against local consensus, not engaging in talk-page discussion -- deliberately disruptive. --EEMIV (talk) 14:55, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 20:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user keeps vandalizing the page and had been reverted multiple times by several editors. The user was also blocked once for three days for edit warring. Last page protection expired today and IP is again back with the revert. This time need a longer page protection. - Vivvt (Talk) 11:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. No need to protect as the IP has been blocked again. GedUK  12:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • IP is blocked for a week. Would you like to keep this request valid for a week to see user behavior after a week? I assume it would be the same and thus don't want to raise page protection request again. - Vivvt (Talk) 17:10, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mid-term semi-protection - Vandalism by a block evading, IP hopping editor. Has been going on for a few days now, with no productive edits in between. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 20:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Vandalism by a block evading, IP hopping editor. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 20:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Vandalism by a block evading, IP hopping editor. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 20:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Dispute whether the Corvette is a sports car or a grand tourer. Other general content disputes. EuroCarGT 02:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment)I'm pretty sure that PC is not usually for content disputes, but for vandalism, as reviewers patrolling pending changes may or may not know anything about the article's subject, or the edit history. try holding an RfC. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 14:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Additionally, as Aunva6 said, pending changes is only used to prevent defamation and vandalism, not to give one party the upper hand in a content dispute. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent Vandalism. Only allow Dominick Galauran and Miko Manalo to edit the Wikipedia Page as per company owner's instructions.

Declined, Wikipedia doesn't work like that. If you represent the company concerned please read Wikipedia:Contact us - Subjects for more information. GedUK  11:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – drop from Semi to PC1 please, I think some unregistered and newly registered users can make helpful contributions, however, the risk is still there. end date should probably be the same. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 18:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Please ask Ks0stm (talk · contribs) GedUK  11:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bradley Manning (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Unprotect the talk page for Bradley Manning. Why are you stifling debate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.148.184 (talk) 16:59, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I suspect the IP is referring to Talk:Chelsea Manning, since Talk:Bradley Manning isn't actually protected. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Please contact the protecting admin directly; Guerillero (talk · contribs). GedUK  12:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jianhui67 Talk 11:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - Constant addition of information copied from other websites and and use of unsourced material by IP editors. Lots of irrelevant information being copied into article by IP editors. Very poor editing by IP editors (ie grammar, spelling, punctuation is incorrect). IP editors are deleting verifiable references. Temporary protection earlier in August appeared to stop this kind of editing. Aeroput (talk) 10:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:58, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - Constant addition and removal of content based on poor sources, rumours and out-of-date references. At least five individual elements of the page are affected: the addition of Jenson Button and Daniel Ricciardo to the driver table, the addition of the Mexican Grand Prix and the removal of the Grand Prix of America in the list of races, and the change of Caterham's engine supplier from "TBA" to Renault in the driver table based on a misleading headline in the reference. Request semi-protection for two weeks, as announcements on the future of these items is expected on or before the next race on 8 September. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks. , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by Ips, including replacing the main image, with that of celebs or sexual acts . Finnegas (talk) 10:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Wifione.. GedUK  11:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - Constant addition of poorly sourced content that has happened a couple of times over the last few days, and the article has a long history of being vandalized every few weeks or so. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think pending changes is a better option. GedUK  11:54, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and dubious unsourced additions. STATic message me! 06:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To add on to this, I'd request it is protected until September 16th, one day after the event has taken place. — Richard BB 08:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected. To avoid timezone vagaries, I've gone for the 17th. GedUK  11:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute. --75.15.208.91 (talk) 05:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Qwyrxian.. GedUK  11:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Unexplained removal of info, no discussion. Blackknight12 (talk) 03:55, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Upcoming film with only a handful of confirmed cast members. Users have been, and will be, adding unconfirmed/rumored cast members in the weeks to come. Areaseven (talk) 02:38, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – This page has received long term violations of the biographies of living persons policy. . Webclient101talk 02:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'd like to give this a few months first to see how it goes before indef. GedUK  11:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – a few days and this should blow over. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by User:Materialscientist. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:80.5.114.243 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Eyesnore Summer! (PC) 00:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by IP users and dubious unsourced additions. STATic message me! 20:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism, disruptive editing and dubious unsourced additions. STATic message me! 20:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: we have a sockpuppet that keeps removing the sources and tags. We have tried to block the different IP's but the user is relentless. -- Moxy (talk) 23:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:55, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection and pending-changes level 2 protection: We have 8 test pages for PC1 only, 2 for PC2 only, but none yet for PC2 and semi together. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mark Arsten (talk) 00:58, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's adding episode synopsis before start date WP:Crystal, I admit something should've been done days ago so apologies, Anyway thanks. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 21:53, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I am not sure if it is at a high level yet, but there is an ongoing dispute and a discussion on the talk page that needs to be finished. United States Man (talk) 20:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 20:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

28 August 2013

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 14:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shirt58 (talk) 14:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new accounts/IPs, within past 24 hours. —MelbourneStar☆talk 10:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 12:16, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism, highly visible page (One Direction). SFK2 (talk) 05:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Zzuuzz (talk · contribs). MikeLynch (talk) 06:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit war, dozens of unhelpful edits, and high level of vandalism and less obviously incorrect information (i.e., the addition of "fiance" to the infobox). BlueMoonset (talk) 23:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The socks are back. Semiprotection worked on Insurgency in the Preševo Valley and Albania–Yugoslav border incident but now they've moved to NATO bombing of the Radio Television of Serbia. Blocking a couple of IP socks would also work... bobrayner (talk) 18:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. I only see one recent disruptive IP, 212.178.246.217. Blocked. Bishonen | talk 20:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing. SMS Talk 16:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

29 August 2013

Pending changes - more yawn-worthy IP-based vandalism. This is the same guy who caused three or more pages to be protected yesterday. There have been some good edits as well though, hence the PC request.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 21:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - more yawn-worthy IP-based vandalism. This is the same guy who caused three or more pages to be protected yesterday. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 21:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - more yawn-worthy IP-based vandalism. This is the same guy who caused three or more pages to be protected yesterday. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 21:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. SMS Talk 20:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 20:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – most recent edits on the page are vandalism and its removal. 1966batfan (talk) 15:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked most of the recent offenders. Not sure about the protection however, I'll leave it up to another admin to decide on. – Connormah (talk) 15:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  20:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like we have had an edit conflict there. The protection that went through was Semi-protected indefinitely. Rationale: the article is totally stable, other than the near daily vandalism. Diannaa (talk) 20:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've no problem with that. GedUK  20:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editwarring, with name-calling in the edit summary. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 19:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  19:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a vandalism campaign going on - multiple edits from a dozen different IPs and some new users. It is a BLP. Dawn Bard (talk) 16:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Connonmah.. GedUK  20:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:NCMAC violations, edit-warring, including IP socks of indeffed Nochoje. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 15:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. until the 12th of Sept by admin De728631. Diannaa (talk) 20:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Cky2250 (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  19:48, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

David Schwedel

Create protection: recent repeated recreation after 2012 AfD ending in "delete" —rybec 17:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. GedUK  19:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A large quantity of edits since about the 23rd have been vandalism. Thanks, Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 14:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 19:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs . Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 19:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: latest victim of anons adding false information. I was advised at WP:ANI#Indonesian vandal range block? that a range block wasn't desirable so I should seek protection when it happened again. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 19:42, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – In the 24 hours I have been incapacitated, there has been a massive age dispute along with other unsourced gossip added. This argument has been the subject of this Digital Spy forum thread, and I have apologised on behalf of the site.--Launchballer 21:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Things seem to have calmed down since your report, but 3 days to be sure, Diannaa (talk) 19:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced, WP:CRYSTAL content, predominantly by IPs. AussieLegend (✉) 16:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 19:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and dubious unsourced additions. STATic message me! 00:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 19:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple pages

List of Warner Bros. films, List of Paramount Pictures films, List of Columbia Pictures films, List of TriStar Pictures films, Sony Pictures Classics.

Semi-protection: Said pages are often disrupted by an IP hopper (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) who suffers from a lack of understanding the concept against the crystal ball method. List of Universal Pictures films was protected for similar reasons. Freshh (talk) 20:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Warner Bros, Paramount, Tristar for 3 days. Columbia is already protected for two more days and Sony does not appear to require protection at this time. Diannaa (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This is a very important article regarding a famous Indian singer and very often IP users make such disgusting edits which are not only humiliating but extremely offensive. More over this page has a good record of IP vandalism since the date it was created. That is why, I want permanent semi-protection of this page. Bubaikumar (talk) 07:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) It's not necessary to semi-protect the article which hasn't been vandalized. Tolly4bolly 11:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Into the Rift (talk) 03:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I've warned the IP.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Continues to input unecessary vandalized programs which is not aired by Cartoon Network Philippines by this IP address. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 01:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please warn the IP if they are making inappropriate edits.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, some sock puppetry Sopher99 (talk) 23:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Montesuma2012

See also the discussion here:[40].--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 00:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. This appears to be a problem with one IP and not one of the experienced editors has warned or even talked to the IP.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandals from the IPs. -- L o g X 19:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Found that the integrity of article is getting maliciously compromised over long term with well concealed patent non-sense that is setup to evade bot detection. See edit history. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 06:33, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent COI/IDIDNTHEARTHAT edits. ukexpat (talk) 00:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Seems to have quieted down. Also appears to be the work of one user editing as a registered account and as an IP. The IP has been warned, and the registered account has been talked to a bit. If this resurfaces, you might consider WP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The page Death of Sammy Yatim has been semi-protected, but one of the same IP's which were responsible for the vandalism is still able to vandalize the talk page. ChakaKongLet's talk about it 00:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. IP blocked for one week. Bbb23 (talk) 10:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and BLP violations. STATic message me! 13:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in past, now restarted following today's news of criminal charges and can only be expected to increase. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment)support protection, addition of defamatory content has re-commenced now that sexual offence charges have been laid. Flat Out let's discuss it 11:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. SFK2 (talk) 07:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Content is continuously being removed by multiple Iranian IPs throughout the past couple of weeks. —MelbourneStar☆talk 12:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP removal of content. Page also at WP:BLP/N. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:49, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 06:58, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edits by a potential sockpuppet (same addition, different IPs). (Loriendrew) talk 11:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Bbb23 (talk) 11:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism/POV pushing. The semi-protection expired a few days ago and the disruption has restarted. Sean.hoyland - talk 11:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:12, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: New film with a lot of buzz along with IP's & non-autoconfirmed users. $oHƎM❊আড্ডা 08:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  WikiProject India editor's observation This is a long-term issue, only in this article, but every newly released Bengali commercial films, specially the films of Dev, Jeet. We have multiple articles semi protected and took that few noticeboards. --Tito☸Dutta 22:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant spam by IP hopper (started in January and increased considerably in the last couple of months). Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 07:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A spiralling edit war and highly contentious talk page discussion indicate this article should be protected until consensus is reached; the situation is getting out of hand. The Old JacobiteThe '45 13:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 10:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Spammy articles about this company were created three times, and were speedily deleted three times. Please salt. If someone wants to try creating this article again, they should use Wikipedia:Articles for creation instead. Unforgettableid (talk) 06:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 06:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Ginsuloft (talk) 23:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Very high level of vandalism by IP editors. STATic message me! 19:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Connormah. Materialscientist (talk) 06:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page seems to be receiving a consistent amount of vandalism, and may benefit from semi-protection. {C  A S U K I T E  T} 23:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. VOAs also indeffed. – Connormah (talk) 23:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP editors and unregistered users (potential sockpuppets) who are changing the genre and main names to something offensive. -AngusWOOF (talk) 19:59, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WP:VOAs also indeffed. – Connormah (talk) 20:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Serious edit war going on with this article. One user is also using multiple accounts to achieve the way they want the article constructed. Article needs protection until a consensus can be reached. – Recollected • 02:52, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see that this request was made. Thanks. Also the multiple accounts, someone else has taken my name and added a 1 to it. That isn't me, its a mockery. You can see that person attacked me on the talk page, calling me a "criminal". The article should not be an advertisement for the subject of the article written by friends and employees in at least on circumstance of the subject of the article. You can see the repeated deletion of the "Controversy" section, and even quotations that are changed to eliminate direct responsibility for the actions of the subject of the article, trying to place the blame on "the industry".LuisDOrtega (talk) 12:24, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Sockpuppets and troll accounts blocked indefinitely, however. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

30 August 2013

Create protection: repeated recreation —rybec 01:49, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Materialscientist. GB fan 10:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: I requested protection a few days ago when one established editor kept removing the "Controversy" section from the article. Since then, at least two other accounts (which look to be new) have removed the section. Removal of the section is under discussion on the talk page, where there doesn't appear to be a consensus. —rybec 20:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Admin Kww has blocked the new accounts as sockpuppets and is watching events unfold. Protection is likely not necessary right now. Diannaa (talk) 01:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Not on the main page anymore, or alternatively add {{Featured picture|Moore tornado}} to the page. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Within the past year (the last ~50 edits), over 80% were vandalism and edits reverting vandalism. Vladimir (talk) 22:42, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GB fan 22:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Vandalism - IP 2.218.174.153 removing important information to the article. Pedro J. [talk] 16:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This looks like a content dispute. GedUK  19:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on a high-profiled artist releasing a VERY highly-profiled and anticipated studio album this fall, and is likely to fall victim of IP attacks and incorrect changes to article, especially due to the artist's public persona changes and high criticisms. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Good edits are also coming from IPs and new users. Pages like this help us attract new editors. Please re-report with sample diffs if/when the situation worsens. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection - Two editors duking it out deleting each other's edits, not talking on the the talk page, and filing complaints about each other on AN/I. Full protection to get them talking to each other to work out some compromises -- there's nothing so egregiously bad about either's version of the article that it will be a disservice to our readers. Once the protection runs out, if they start up again, some attention-getting blocks might be a good idea. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 22:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 02:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm just not seeing it. Please re-report with diffs if you disagree. Diannaa (talk) 19:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Just like Miley's twerking, the high amount of IP vandalism shows no signs of slowing down. There have been numerous instances of false track titles being added, in addition to the removal of sourced, relevant material. WikiRedactor (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Good edits are also coming from IPs and new users. Pages like this help us attract new editors. Please re-report with sample diffs if/when the situation worsens. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

31 August 2013

Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple IP vandalism. User was blocked, however changed IP. Article was recently protected for several days. Request another semi-block on article for two weeks. Msw1002 (talk) 05:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to another IP with same vandalism and comment. Might need a one month semi-protection. Msw1002 (talk) 14:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 21:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – ;Chelsea Manning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Recently, someone requested a rename to "Private Manning". Therefore, I expect an extension of move-protection right away. Also, along with the recent decision to revert back to "Bradley", the administrator requested waiting no less than 30 days to request re-renaming to Chelsea. George Ho (talk) 04:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. The indef move protection followed when the article was moved back to 'Bradley'. KrakatoaKatie 21:29, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - persistent vandalism and reversion by IP users.--Smerus (talk) 07:16, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Your IP users are sockpuppets. KrakatoaKatie 21:42, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This article has been indefinitely semi-protected since July 2010. Most of the things that triggered vandalism have likely gone away, and it's not currently a high-profile page. I think the page should be unprotected. Heymid (contribs) 13:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected KrakatoaKatie 21:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:29, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 20:56, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been nonstop Vandalism. Bobherry talk 14:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 21:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many, many unhelpful IP edits, please protect for a few days. JMHamo (talk) 12:07, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 21:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been continuously removing sourced contents. Tolly4bolly 07:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 21:07, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This article is currently getting a lot of attention from zealous editors who wish to insert spoiler warnings, but who may not yet be privy to WP:SPOILER or Wikipedia's WP:NOTCENSORED policy. It's not epidemic, but I'm requesting a temporary block of 2 weeks or so against IP editors and non-autoconfirmed users, assuming that's a reasonable request in this case. There is an active discussion going on about how to incorporate spoiler plot details into this article. Thanks! . Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:17, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 21:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term protection. Sockpuppetry resumed after unprotection. Nothing but addition of false information since 2010. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:19, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 20:30, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and sockpuppetry - Since the protection was removed, IPs and even auto-confirmed users (some of them are sockpuppets) are vandalising the article, and such disruptive activity is proving to be too hot to handle.----Jionpedia ✉ 17:05, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 20:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the protection has been removed, all the IPs have done is try to remove the killer from it. JDDJS (talk) 15:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 20:49, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article was protected and protection has recently been removed. There have been several edits in the last few hours, for instance changing 'dog' to 'doge'. After several edits to-ing and fro-ing, mainly by IPs, I reverted to most recent 'protected' version, which was promptly changed by another IP that (thankfully!) has just been reverted by by another editor. SagaciousPhil - Chat 20:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. KrakatoaKatie 20:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: For a long time now, a large percentage of the IP edits to this article have been time-wasting. Instead of semi-protection, pending changes would prevent the nonsense from going live.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 10:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if you change your mind and want to try semi-protection instead, as that would also be a good option here. Diannaa (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous IP jumping vandals. Nymf (talk) 08:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 19:04, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A dynamic IP, going through several different ranges, is insisting on reinstating an older image in the infobox. Any chances of this being in good faith were destroyed in this edit. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Dumbfuxxor4 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Protection or reblock. Vandalism. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:43, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Materialscientist (talk) 04:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Persistent unsourced speculation being added to the article as to the North American release date. Article was already semi-protected for this same reason earlier this month. - Aoidh (talk) (formerly User:SudoGhost) 23:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note there's no record of previous protection; you must be thinking of a different article. Diannaa (talk) 18:54, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evading user repeatedly posting inappropriate external video links. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 04:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite semiprotection isn't really an option here, since the problems only started a couple of hours ago and the article has never been semiprotected before. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Repeated vandalism from IP users [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] and one non-autoconfirmed account [47], due to controversies during the current high-profile England–Australia cricket series, which will continue until 17 September. I suggest semi-protection until February 2014, as England are about to travel to Australia for a return series. (Back-to-back series like this are unusual; on average, teams only play each other once every two years or so.) Dricherby (talk) 10:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., we do not proactively protect pages. GB fan 10:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Although vandalism has not been persistent yet, there have been vandal incidents. George Ho (talk) 00:24, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GB fan 10:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Archive/2013/08&oldid=1189888625"