Jump to content

User talk:Rivertown

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1/4/2014 To me, the user 82.128...'s link in Netflix seems to be appropriate per Wikipedia's policy. The policy says that: 'Links to potentially revenue-generating web pages are not prohibited (...)' Furthermore, 'Links normally to be avoided' section does not seem to rule out such a link. You might have been too eager to interpret the user 82.128...'s link as spam; and you could probably consider close reading Wikipedia's policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schwarzencreutz (talkcontribs) 10:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia Schwarzencreutz. The link fails WP:ELNO #1, since the site being inserted into the article provides no real information that Netflix itself does not provide, and as Netflix is already linked at the Netflix article, it is unnecessary to include that external link on the article. - Aoidh (talk) 11:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for restoring the EL. It now works for me too. Who knows if it was a their end/my end or any of the other wonderful mysteries of using a PC. I am glad that it is working again and that you restored if. Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 19:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Roku#Wrap-up

[edit]

@Rivertown: i saw you objected earlier to Mdann52's drive-by-deletion of a useful comparison table and other content from the Roku page. A discussion over that is nearing an end, can you add your voice to the wrap-up? EnTerr (talk) 08:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]