User talk:Novangelis

Archives

Up to Wikipedia's Tenth anniversary
(January 15, 2011)

From Wikipedia's Tenth to Thirteenth anniversaries
(January 16, 2011 – January 15, 2014)

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

GA nomination of Recurrent laryngeal nerve

Hello Novangelis! I have nominated the above article for GA status, and as you've been the main contributor, I thought I'd just leave a note to let you know. Best, --LT910001 (talk) 03:13, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It was your interest in the article that gave me the push to focus on it. Without it, the edits would have trickled in over the next year or two.Novangelis (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday: NYC Art And Feminism Wikipedia Editathon

Please join Wikipedia "Art and Feminism Editathon" @ Eyebeam on Saturday February 1, 2014,
an event aimed at collaboratively expanding Wikipedia articles covering Art and Feminism, and the biographies of women artists!

There are also regional events that day in Brooklyn, Westchester County, and the Hudson Valley.
--Pharos (talk)

Your GA nomination of Recurrent laryngeal nerve

The article Recurrent laryngeal nerve you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Recurrent laryngeal nerve for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seppi333 -- Seppi333 (talk) 01:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hurray! (copied from my wall, although I nominated this really applied to us both) LT910001 (talk) 02:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS given any thought to archiving your talk page...? LT910001 (talk) 02:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @LT910001: that archive was overdue. Unless I get more active again (and not just scattered bad weather days), a long talk page is inappropriate. I just pushed myself to source the existing content and generate accurate content based on reliable sources. You took my heaps of material and made it into an article. I'm proud of it. Wikipedia probably has the best general encyclopedia article on the subject. I'll see what I can do about that one sentence you couldn't source--I'm sure I had a source I couldn't find, but I didn't have time for a real search. I wish I gotten to it during the review, but (for better or worse) on Wikipedia, there is always time.Novangelis (talk) 03:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming Saturday events - March 1: Harlem History Editathon and March 8: NYU Law Editathon

You are invited to join upcoming Wikipedia "Editathons", where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on a selected theme, on the following two Saturdays in March:

Saturday March 1: Harlem History Editathon (RSVP), focusing on Harlem history, landmarks and biographies
Saturday March 8: NYU Law Editathon (RSVP), focusing on innovation law and intellectual property (with social dinner afterward)

I hope to see you there! Pharos (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Why have you removed my "external link" under "knee replacement" at: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knee_replacement"

The external link refers to an article written by a US trained board certified orthopaedic surgeon who summarizes the all of the current peer reviewed literature related to bilateral versus unilateral knee replacements. The article also includes unique x-rays images and links to the American Academy of Orthopaedic surgeons official comments on the subject. The article is not judgmental and provides a very balanced review.

Additionally, you left the other external links on the "knee replacement" page of Wiki that refer to articles written by lay people who do not have any expertise on the subjects. I request that you comment and/or remove your "undo" from our material.

MD at My Knee Guide (talk) 22:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It has been 10 days and I have not heard a response.

MD at My Knee Guide (talk) 23:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EYE Magazine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EYE Magazine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EYE Magazine (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:12, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral notice

There is an RfC at an article you have edited, to which you may wish to add your input: Talk:American Flagg!#Request for comment. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]