Talk:Polyamory: Married & Dating

Television: Episode coverage / Reality Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Reality television task force.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Names, episodes, etc.

Episode numbers are based on how many have aired, not how many are ordered or projected. The members of the cast, also known as the stars of the show, have made their full names and association with the show public all over the Internet. If they believe their privacy is violated despite appearing on a nationally televised program under their own names and with full faces faces visible then it is up to the individuals in question to assert the privacy violation, not you. Continuing to remove valid information will be considered vandalism. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 23:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Season indicators

Per Wikipedia style guidelines, the tenure of current cast members on shows still airing is to be open ended. (Season 1— ) is correct. (Season 1—2) is not. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 03:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting edit

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

hi there, we would like to ask admin to please make the following edits: update the number of episodes to 10 , since 10 have aired. and to please add the following article to external links, http://gawker.com/more-merrier-showtimes-polyamory-married-and-dating-1150047848 . User Jerry Pepsi repeatedly removed this article for no reason. it is the latest article review of season 2. thanks. (Tvfanatics (talk) 18:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Not done: because you are one of the parties involved in the recent edit-war --Redrose64 (talk) 19:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So when?

so when is the page going to be open for edits? we are the ones that requested the page to be closed because we were being harrassed by user jerry pepsi. and our edits are completely reasonable, why are they being denied? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvfanatics (talk • contribs) 02:15, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, actually, I requested that the page be protected in order to strongly encourage you to discuss your differences with Jerry Pepsi, which you have not done, while he has tried to do so. In light of your unwillingness to discuss the editing of the article with another editor and your personal attacks on that editor on his talk page, if you continue your behavior once the page is unprotected, I will stongly be recommending that an admin block you. If I were you, I would start discussing the article with Jerry Pepsi, calmly and civilly, and stop accusing him of "harrassment" and other sins he is not guilty of. Making such allegations without evidence is a violation of our policy against personal attacks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:13, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, who is "we"? Are you a group of people using one account? Do you represent a group? If so, what is the relationship of that group to the TV program in question? Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:13, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[:@Beyondmyken: Just saw this. My wife and I are fans, that is the collective "we". We are fans and we are polyamorous and excited there is a show about US. That is who "us" is.And no, jerry pepsi did not try to talk to us/me once when the page was locked, I don't know why you are saying that. He continues to undo edits without taking heed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvfanatics (talk • contribs) 19:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You should know that among Wikipedias many many rules is one that say that if you both wan´t to edit, you should have separate usernames, see WP:NOSHARE. All the best. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:48, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

needs a coroner

Some authority NEEDS to be cited to declare that the series is either alive or dead, rather than in some sort of Zombie Limbo Purgatory. To be encyclopedic, the page CANNOT simply go on forever declaring (a bit defensively perhaps) that

The show is currently on hiatus … but has not been definitively canceled

in the lede, seeing as its last new ep aired SIX years ago.

As that claim is in no way supported in the article, I declare it gone. Let us know when the contract gets picked up.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 17:08, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]