User talk:Corsika

June 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Norwegian School of Economics has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Norwegian School of Economics was changed by Corsika (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905208 on 2013-06-24T05:01:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Norwegian School of Economics with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Eye snore Summer! (PC) 05:12, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:21, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Corsika (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

nhh to be recovered, will be done. Corsika (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.--jpgordon^{::==( o )} 05:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Corsika (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Read the following very carefully. More importantly, understand it. What you have done in the past few years is not providence or a validation of you or your tribes. It has been allowed, against my will, without my knowledge and consent. It stems from a weakness that saddens me. This does not finish well for you - wherever you are, your friends in Norway or in Argentina, name a place, you are marked. The very people who gave you these administrator rights don't want you. Do not let this game become dangerous. Let it be a game. I'm being called to eradicate. I will settle for withdrawal. This is not a movie, and your parents did not give you birth to rule the world. Be careful, very little is left of you, I suggest you cherish it, it won't hurt me to completely destroy you. I will take both these institutions, NHH and SPS, and more. I plead you to move away. What you think is 'good times' can turn when I want it to turn. You are not my sole threat, Wikipedia people are my slightest threat. I deal with more. You are little children. Don't make a war to become great. It is called being foolish. (Pawns move one square at a time. I'm not looking for you, I'm looking for The King.) Be good. Regards, Amanbir Singh. Corsika (talk) 06:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Here's a hint (read it carefully): even though Wikipedia is not a game, you still need to follow the rules. This is a private website, and you agreed to those very rules, and threats do not become you (✉→BWilkins←✎) 09:18, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.