User talk:Doncram/Archive 31

Archive 25

←

Archive 29

Archive 30

Archive 31

Archive 32

it's happening. game over?

It seems to be happening to me now. I am being crushed at wp:ANI. I don't see anything I can do to stop it, or anything anyone else can do either. Now or ever. --Doncram (talk) 16:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

• Hang in there, friend. Your efforts are appreciated. In particular, your HHA campaign has turned up many notable historic properties that have been heretofore overlooked. All of that said, the community consensus is clear that (a) any further HHA articles need to be supported by independent sourcing, and (b) the HHA site is not considered independent. If you were to succinctly state that you understand and will comply with this consensus, it would likely go a long way in defusing the discussion. Cbl62 (talk) 20:43, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I nearly did say a and b. I could say those directly, I suppose, despite being furious about those being imposed at ANI instead of being determined civilly at Talk:Historic Hotels of America, say. But do you really think any one would move? I don't think anything can defuse the situation. --Doncram (talk) 22:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

I think it would help. Cbl62 (talk) 22:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

I like the HHA article. It did have two problems. (1) the notes to yourself. I think it should have been a draft until that was taken out. (2) I was taken back by the HHA website wanted to book you into the hotel, although it does seem to have good factual information - I don't doubt that. I hope to get to Savannah in the next few days for photos. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 01:46, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Doncram - No one can can crush the Truth! Your efforts count, without your standing up for the right thing to do - our message would be hidden in the chaos! You are a good man and we stand in witness to your work. Thank You - Wherever you do it, keep up the good/God Works! Best regards Michael S. Legions (talk) 04:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your post on the NRHP Project's talk page is perhaps the most blatant violation of WP:Canvassing that I've seen in 15 years of editing Wikipedia. I have deleted it. Policy allows you to post a neutral pointer to the AN/I discussion, and nothing more than that. You cannot plead your case, or indicate which way you want people to respond. Please read WP:Canvassing if you have any questions about the policy. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC) Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your replacement notice is perfect, thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:30, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Delgado Street Bridge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delgado Street Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delgado Street Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JTZegers (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

ANI Thread Closure

I have closed the ANI thread. You are now subject to an indefinite ban from creating new articles in mainspace or moving articles you have written to mainspace. You may submit draft articles to Articles for Creation for review by an independent editor. You are also warned that further creation of articles based on directory-style resource may lead to other sanctions. Barkeep49 (talk) 04:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes, noted. That is about this closing by Barkeep49 in two edits(, of ANI proceeding titled "Historic Hotels of America". I disagree with fairness and wisdom of that ANI proceeding. I deeply dislike ANI itself as a fundamentally unfair venue and its usage as a bludgeon to beat up productive, experienced content editors (me, in that case) and newbies often, alike. In my case, given a complicated past within Wikipedia, once that ANI proceeding was started and accepted, the editing career I have had in Wikipedia was basically ended. My career, such as it is, has been sustainable for me in terms of being adequately satisfying, personally, and has been highly productive for development of Wikipedia (especially in terms of my pioneering and developing large areas of networked content, and in terms of my participating constructively as a citizen in the community in a number of ways). Oh well. I may or may not explain further sometime.

It remains open to me to participate in Wikipedia say by restricting my involvement to non-mainspace venues like wp:AFD, wp:CFD, wp:ANI, arbitration proceedings, etc., which is a turn I have seen a number of editors take, when faced by a setback like this. For me, though, I have long had a balance, which is reflected in tool reports about which spaces I contributed to over time. I was willing to participate some in the overhead, non-mainspace venues and take on constructive longterm projects within them (not claiming to have had big successes, but I generally did have big projects in mind), but that was always balanced by my achieving some enjoyment by freely wielding my expertise and skills in content production, especially in pioneering new networks of information (in a new main topic article and related list-article and linked item articles and related articles addressing content voids that become apparent (like creating a needed architect article, which informs a bunch of the items, or like creating a new disambiguation page which has become needed). I am not now prohibited from editing in mainspace, but the ban now in place, besides being insulting and unjust in my view, would effectively hamstring me, directly preventing me from filling in, expeditiously, the obvious voids that need to be addressed in tackling any big project. Also the ANI judgement and ban firmly establish, or re-establish, a negative consensus about me, making me a lower-class Wikipedian, and more likely to be hit by further negative actions. So basically I do see my former career to be ended.

I may or may not find my way towards becoming involved in Wikipedia in some other constructive way. I think it would have further fueled outrage in the ANI if I explicitly stated that I would retire if the ANI were closed as it has been, and I did not say so directly there. I do think it is most likely that I will effectively retire, either by withdrawing completely and abruptly or perhaps by just fading away. Hmm, for either way of retiring, I am not immediately sure how to do that, like how I might try to close initiatives I have taken forward instead of simply abandoning them, and how I might want to convey some messages to friends and others. This posting is not my final goodbye.

I don't intend to have a discussion here, now, about any of this really; I am now in wiki-break mode and this is not the time for me and this public page is not the venue. Please don't anyone try to continue the ANI here; if there are comments made here along the same lines i expect I will delete them, as is my right. This is just a quick recording of some current views of mine, that I am willing to share to some friends and concerned others right now. --Doncram (talk) 01:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

DRN Volunteer Roll Call - Action Required

There has been no roll call since November 2017 so with that said, it is time to clean up the volunteer list. Please go to the Roll Call list and follow the instructions. If no response is received by May 30, 2020, it will be assumed that you no longer wish to participate and you will be removed as a DRN volunteer. Thank you for your attention to this and for helping Wikipedians in their dispute processes.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} at 12:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

NRHP articles

For the record, I always admired your dedication to the NRHP articles. I think that body of work is one of the most interesting corners of Wikipedia. I love browsing lists of historic buildings in small towns I've never visited. Zagalejo^^^ 04:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Hotels

Don't get discouraged about the hotels. A little work will fix them. The main article has already been moved to mainspace. I add new photos of the three Savannah hotels. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 04:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

I worked on the DeSoto some and moved it to mainspace. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 19:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

I wish you had spoken up at wp:ANI, where you could have made a difference. Perhaps you have a personal policy of not getting involved there, or perhaps you think worse of me than I knew. Anyhow your choosing not to, did hurt me. Your encouraging note here plus the gesture you mention are, well, too little too late not sufficient, oh well. --Doncram (talk) 09:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi Doncram, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

"Knickerbocker Building ( New Rochelle, New York)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Knickerbocker Building ( New Rochelle, New York). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Knickerbocker Building ( New Rochelle, New York) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

"Santa Rosa de Lima ( Abiquiu, New Mexico)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Santa Rosa de Lima ( Abiquiu, New Mexico). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Santa Rosa de Lima ( Abiquiu, New Mexico) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:18, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

"Todd County Courthouse ( Long Prairie, Minnesota)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Todd County Courthouse ( Long Prairie, Minnesota). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Todd County Courthouse ( Long Prairie, Minnesota) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:23, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Quality and continuous improvement organizations has been nominated for merging

Category:Quality and continuous improvement organizations has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mormon derricks

A tag has been placed on Category:Mormon derricks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Disambiguation-stop has been nominated for deletion

Category:Disambiguation-stop has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Trialpears (talk) 14:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello Doncram,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Hollywood District for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hollywood District is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood District until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Lake Merges - please use the merge proposal template

I know there are many lake stubs out there, but please before merging with a redirect apply the merge proposal process WP:MERGE to alert the project. We're working on a structure to make sure articles can be tracked if they are merged and still have potential. For example the redirect of Big Lake (Grant County, Minnesota). Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 10:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Carretera Central

Hello Doncram, in ref to this edit, I did a quick search at the NRHP DB for the months just before your edit, but was not able to verify the edit. Can you provide a cite that "A portion of the Carretera Central from partway through Caguas to the end of Juana Diaz was listed on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places in 2019"? I am also pinging Ipoellet as I believe I've seen him edit nrhp articles in Puerto Rico too and he might know about this. If we don't have a cite, it will probably be best to remove the info in question until a cite can be found. Thanks, Mercy11 (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2020 (UTC).

Mercy11, It is cited in National Register of Historic Places listings in central Puerto Rico. You can add a citation from there. The article should get a NRHP infobox as well. MB 22:53, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

MB, thanks. I have added what I think is a reasonable cite. Still, I was not able to locate the the nomination form for this entry. I understand it may not have been digitized yet (something I don't know for sure anyway), so the allegation that Juan Llanes-Santos authored the forms, as claimed at cite #10 here, is puzzling to me, so I have placed a FULL tag there instead.

As for the article getting a NRHP infobox as well, wouldn't that be create confusion since not the entire length of the road was designted for NRHP? It puzzles me why the endpoints (San Juan and Ponce) were not included. That, of course, is something that the nomination form would likely shed some light on. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 00:06, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Mercy11, I added the infobox. The text explains that the listing does not include the entire roadway so I think it will be clear. It looks like the central portion was listed because of engineering challenges in the mountains not present on the ends. The nom form would help explain this. MB 00:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Mercy11, I just found the nomination form and added the url to the reference. You can read it and expand the article if you would like, I'm not planning to work on this any further, at least in the immediate future. MB 00:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

WTF. Listen, if i said it was listed and that the nomination doc was written by Juan Llanes-Santos, i did not effing make that up. It should not be necessary to respond to accusations of fabrication/lying after developing so much of Wikipedia including extensive cooperation with Mercy11. Thanks MB i guess, but no one should have to get dragged in this way. Mercy11, your behavior here is pretty jerkish, IMHO. --Doncram (talk) 01:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

And/or, I was in a pretty crabby mood when I responded above. Sorry, User:Mercy11, about that; I am glad you are continuing to be active, while I have essentially withdrawn from Wikipedia, compared to my previous participation, following jerkish treatment by the Wikipedia community (not that the community is self-aware and can grok that) at wp:ANI proceeding to which i was dragged. Which was inappropriate setting for talking about the validity of one source, and which came down with an editing restriction upon me, insulting and deliberately so on the part of several participants there by my interpretation. And there's nothing i can do about it. --Doncram (talk) 19:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

@Doncram: No worries. Things here can be a bit crazy at times. I read much of the ANI behavior you alluded to. Hey, I am glad you are back, if are back to move on and, if not, as always I wish you the best. Mercy11 (talk) 19:33, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Buffalo Presbyterian Church (Montello, Wisconsin) concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Buffalo Presbyterian Church (Montello, Wisconsin), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Sure, about that, I believe it was a valid mainspace article, and should not have been moved to Draft space by MarkH21, with absurd and confrontational statements like "I'm not challenging the factual accuracy" but am moving it because I don't like it, more or less, on the Talk page. As I recall i looked into the issues they posed, which seemed manufactured IIRC, and IIRC found them to be wrong, but I did not then choose to fight their obstinacy in some dispute resolution process. I am in general not opposed to further developing things, though, and I worked out a source that would be helpful for this and for coverage of numerous other historic churches: I got in contact with a person at the American Presbyterian and Reformed Historic Sites and was prepared to spend $100 or so for them to copy and send a copy of the APRHS's documentation of the first 200 or some such number of the Presbyterian churches they listed. This would be an excellent source; probably many if not all of the churches documented by them might be individually notable in Wikipedia by dint of their listing and documentation. But I am less active, more or less resigned from active editing, due to other harassment (as I perceive it) involving at least one very well known bully and involving typically unfair practices in that pig-sty of wp:ANI. So i dunno when I might develop this, maybe soon, maybe not too soon. You evil bot, yourself: I moved it to my Userspace just now to take it out of your reach, hopefully for good. --Doncram (talk) 09:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

I did not move the article to draftspace because of the mentioned discussion, but because of the concerns here: the article is written about a church in Marquette County, Wisconsin whereas the cited American Presbyterian/Reformed Historic Sites Registry listing here is for a church in Winnebago County, Wisconsin. — MarkH₂₁^talk 09:27, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

You were ignorant, obstinate and obnoxious, that is the main message you conveyed. Please don't post here further. --Doncram (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

A hint as to the actual location is at Presbyterian Historical Society: Buffalo Presbyterian Church, Montello, Wisconsin. Given that it is described as being maintained by the Buffalo United Presbyterian Cemetery Association it is easy to locate it on Google Street View. Given the relative locations on the map, it seems to me to be clearly in Marquette County, of which Montello is the County Seat, suggesting the county heading in American Presbyterian/Reformed Historic Sites Registry is mistaken. --PeterR2 (talk) 23:24, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Jean Kirkpatrick (sociologist), date of birth and death

Are you sure that the sociologist Jean Kirkpatrick was born on 19 November 1926 and died on 07 December 2006? You gave an online reference but that one is dead now so I cannot check this. I just ask because these dates are the very same dates of birth and death of the politician Jeane Kirkpatrick which seems to me a very odd coincidence. Could this be some sort of mix-up? Originally the article about the sociologist stated that she was born c. 1923. --Proofreader (talk) 15:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

User:Proofreader, I am positive that what I wrote was in good faith and was accurate in drawing upon the source that I cited. I don't lie, and it would be very unusual for me to make a mistake like confusing the politician for the sociologist, and in fact I did not have any such confusion. You can verify that by seeing the Wayback Machine's archived copy of the webpage, here: https://web.archive.org/web/20190823001811/www.apkbooks.com/Dr_Jean_Kirkpatrick.html , which gives those 1926 and 2006 dates of birth and death and is explicitly about the sociologist. It is also possible that the source I relied upon was incorrect, as you suggest the politician of similar name has the same dates. Indeed the original article as written by me, before anyone else edited it, stated the sociologist was born c. 1923, based on the 1995 Morning Call source that I cited: https://www.mcall.com/news/mc-xpm-1995-04-13-3040809-story.html , in which there is statement that she was a 72-year-old at that time. I surmise that I perceived the statement in the APKBooks source to be more reliable, because it was more specific. However, the Morning Call article was written as an interview of her; she was there herself to state what her age was, and traditionally women are not likely to add years to their age. So, given the unlikely coincidence that you noticed, it now seems more likely to me that the 1926 and 2006 dates are incorrect, and c.1923 is more likely correct. I.e. that the unattributed author of the APKbooks source was themself convinced of the incorrect dates by some other source about Jeane rather than Jean. Perhaps many have confused the two, even perhaps in person during their lives, I can imagine an awkward conversation at a party or wherever happening sometimes. Thank you for your attention in identifying, in effect, the error in the source that I cited, and your polite inquiry. I wish you good luck in finding the actual dates. --Doncram (talk) 08:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

P.S. Found obituary here; she died 2000; seems to confirm c.1923 birth. Added that and a bit more to article. --Doncram (talk) 10:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Never intended to accuse you of any willful wrongdoing. Sometimes there are odd coincidences, like John Adams and Thomas Jefferson dying both on the same day, a 4th of July. But I suppose you are right and there has been a mistake in the original sources here. --Proofreader (talk) 22:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Central Business District

Your attention is called to the addition of this display to the article on the Central Business District, Los Angeles (1880s-1890s). Do you have any feelings, for or against? Discussion should take place on that article's Talk page. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Buffalo Gap Historic Village

I noticed that this was deleted as a copyvio created by User:Billy Hathorn. I have restored it as a stub, in case you would like to expand it. Cheers! BD2412 T 23:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

about Trestle bridges

I received polite offline inquiry from User:Dmwilliams(?) about my possibly having incorrectly added Category:Trestle bridges to many articles. Please see, comment at Category talk:Trestle bridges in the United States. --Doncram (talk) 14:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Lauren Lakis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauren Lakis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Lakis (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

You should be thanked more often

	So, thank you!
	TY for caring to get things right. I made one article today too for the NRHP project. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 02:53, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inn at Montchanin Village has been accepted

Inn at Montchanin Village, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, Bkissin, for expanding the article a bit and restoring it to mainspace. The article was moved to Draft space as part of an ANI mob attack upon myself and my judgment which has largely ended my participation in Wikipedia. Over many years I used to create and develop several articles a day; now I do not create any at all, and I edit only occasionally, mostly at AFD. I appreciate your verification that this article, like probably all the other ones disputed at the time, is indeed a Wikipedia-notable topic. --Doncram (talk) 18:41, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey Doncram. I remember seeing that come up at ANI, sorry you had to go through that. Wikipedia is not serious business, and we shouldn't take personal attacks and stuff to heart. From someone who helps with Article for Creation, I can tell you that your drafts had potential, but I always err more on the side that it's better to create an article that is properly fleshed out and cited rather than submit multiple stubs with 3-4 sentences. You didn't ask for my opinion, so I apologize if this brings up bad memories of your treatment at ANI, but you seem to do OK work and if you need help later, let me know. Bkissin (talk) 19:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Missing term: tapestry brick

(was "Missing term")

I just ran across "tapestry brick", used in over 30 articles, but no place to link this to. Searching doesn't result in much, so probably not enough for an article. Maybe a paragraph in Brickwork. MB 05:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

User:MB: I forgot about this note from you until just coming across it now. Separately, I recently came across the term again, for Draft:R.T. Frazier House, and I got puzzled what it meant there. I started Draft:Tapestry brick thinking it would be simple at first, but there are at least 3 quite distinct meanings! The most I could find was about simple 2-tone patterns, which did not apply to Frazier House. Finally got to only one source which defines "Tapestry brick is 'a brick having a rough, unscored, textured surface.'" which can make for an interesting looking brick surface when laid in simple running bond a wall is made from it, and seems to be what is meant at Frazier. A different meaning is for slightly complex brickwork (not rough, not two-toned) in Arts & Crafts style that I have seen myself I think in elaborate fireplaces in a Ward Wellington Ward-designed house in Syracuse NY, which I recognize from early 1900s book source showing a number of such designs. I bet that the fireplace I recall, in the basement level but opening out to the back of the house built on a slope in 1913, is exactly one of those designs in the 1909 book. This one is quite aggravating. I just figured it appears 40 times or so already in wikipedia, but I don't see how to make an article out of 3 or more different usages, where no source is aware of more than 1 usage, and there is hardly enough for an article on any single one. I wonder, could you possibly take a look at what I found and look again for sources? You always seem to find some sources that I don't.... --Doncram (talk) 17:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

I added some sources to the draft. I am not really seeing three different meaning. T.B is brick with a rough surface (or at least a common term in the early 20th century, we still have rough-faced brick but I've never heard it called T.B. in "modern times"). It doesn't matter what in what pattern it is laid. I saw there was that one source that said it was brick laid in an intricate art/crafts pattern. But that same source pointed to the Fiske fireplace book, which talks all about T.B., which it trademarked. It it showing-off fancy fireplaces built with it's T.B., and they happened to have intricate patterns as well, to make them more interesting/fancy/desirable. But the same fireplaces could have been built with smooth brick in the same fancy patterns. I think T.B. just refers to the not-smooth face and anyone who mixes it up with the pattern is wrong. Although the thesis says "characteristics of the Tapestry Brick phenomenon — panels of pattern-laid brick framed in decorative coursework; flat, sculpted parapets with stone details", but that was written in 2012 - but he was defining a new "style" in Brooklyn and named it "Tapestry Brick" but it clearly refers to more than just the brickwork - it's the whole facade with parapets, stone details, etc. Since the main component is T.B., that's what he choose to call this style of residential building in Brooklyn. I think if we just said T.B was a generic term for rough/scored brick there is still enough for an article about that. MB 20:11, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

User:MB, thanks! Right, for the T.B. defined to be just a single rough-edged brick, it doesn't matter how it is laid, it will always be T.B. I amended my statement above where i used term running bond, when i just meant that as a simple regular wall. That's one definition. I still see at least 2 more definitions. Haven't looked at your sources yet, will return later. Thanks again already. --Doncram (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

User:MB, i organized my thoughts a bit better over at Draft:Tapestry brick, and I developed out some of the references in the process. Your source which you labelled "good background" seemed good but maybe too blog-like at first, but my perception of its quality has grown. It is an article in an industry association magazine. I'm more organized with a list of potentially technically different meanings, but I am definitely not committed there on asserting whether there are truly different meanings for the term. You might take a browse there?

However, there really is not very much usage of the term; it might be considered mostly a marketing term for the company that attempted to trademark it. Perhaps better would be to create a new article at Face brick to cover the bigger topic of the "face brick" and the "face brick industry", and to cover the term "tapestry brick" within that. Julie M. Rosen's work (long abstract here) looks great about documenting a serious history, the development of an industry: "The rapid evolution of face brick production processes, terminology, and aesthetics over the course of approximately sixty years (1880-1940) created an ever-growing national face brick industry that was cemented by the 1912 establishment of the American Face Brick Association." That association is a real thing, while there is no Tapestry Brick Association. One publication of theirs is cited in Belt course article: "A Manual of Face Brick Construction" (1920).

References

And [https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Story_of_Brick_the_Permanence_Beauty/UzW2zgEACAAJ?hl=en this "Story of Brick..." is a 2021 reprint of a 1926 book now in the public domain (though I don't immediately see how/where to get it in PDF). And there are pattern books for 5-room and 6-room face brick houses. Only spent 2 minutes searching though.

Thanks again for your help on Anton Korn situation. I will plug on that and the Southwest Museum article but am done for a while now. --Doncram (talk) 05:54, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

This discussion was copied over to Draft talk:Tapestry brick (thanks User:MB for doing that, i thot that would be good to do) and continues there. --Doncram (talk) 22:22, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

"Santa Rosa de Lima ( Abiquiu, New Mexico)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Santa Rosa de Lima ( Abiquiu, New Mexico). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 20#Santa Rosa de Lima ( Abiquiu, New Mexico) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 17:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel Skyler has been accepted

Hotel Skyler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Bkissin for your development of this article and for returning it to mainspace. I just tried again to find a pic. Instead I just now added a pic and some info about nearly adjacent synagogue which is confusingly similar (same orientation, same street number 601, also on one of two streets for which Crouse-Irving Hospital is named, also with four engaged columns). --Doncram (talk) 20:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Need help with an NRHP infobox

I'm working on the draft User:Vchimpanzee/Magnolia House‎. I only have one source so far but I can probably find others. What I don't know is how nris works, or how to identify this building's number (Shober Bridge is 99000273).— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Vchimpanzee. Is your Magnolia House one of the North Carolina items that show up in this report querying for "Magnolia" in the so-called NRHP infobox generator system (a private person's system provided as a service to Wikipedia editors)? If so, you can just click on link to its prepared infobox. http://elkman.net/nrhp/ is the main index of that system. http://elkman.net/nrhp/infobox.php is a query which accepts either the NRIS number like "99000273", or the name "Shober" (to provide infoboxes for any and all places with "Shober" in the name). Does this give you what you need?

By the way, I am less active in Wikipedia now, and if I don't reply promptly here, you can always ask anything NRHP-related at wt:NRHP.

cheers, --Doncram (talk) 18:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. It did not show up, but ironically, one location on the list was in Greensboro, Alabama and the next was in another community in North Carolina but not Greensboro. — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

GAN co-nom?

I've recently done some expansion and work on Marais des Cygnes Massacre Site, an article you created awhile back. I think it meets the GA criteria now, and have nominated it for GAN. Would you be interested in doing a formal co-nomination, since you did a lot of the early work on the article? Hog Farm _Bacon 00:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Ping (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Ping and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Grace Ping, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Doncram! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 06:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Request for review recent edits to Church Of The Creator

This is about Church of the Creator, a benign organization which has suffered from misappropriation of its name by an evil white supremacist organization in the past. It has suffered from mistreatment by Wikipedia editors being evil too, having enforced association of the good church with the evil thing for many years, until being "fixed", sort of, by me and others, a few years ago --Doncram (talk) 02:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Doncram, I hope you are well and are finding a place of peace within the current circumstances of human refinement we are all experiencing. Also the "game over" saga within Wikipedia. If you can, recently an external link was added to the Church of the Creator Article, at the bottom:

External links *[http://www.churchofthecreator.com/ Church Of The Creator], official website {{Authority control}} [[Category:Christian new religious movements]] [[Category:Christian organizations established in 1969]] [[Category:1969 establishments in Oregon]] [[Category:Ashland, Oregon]]

It seems to me that this is an attempt to direct users to "creativity" and its history, not focused on TE-TA-MA/Church Of The Creator. If you would review, and remove if that is an accurate assessment, please remove.

If you can't do this, some comment, direction would be appreciated. Michael S. Legions (talk) 14:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi User:Michael S. Legions, doesn't that link go to the main official webpage of the Church of the Creator? If not, please explain.

Anyhow, it is very normal and appropriate in my view for an article about a specific person, place, organization, or other thing to include a clearly identified external link to the main official website of the thing. If a church building is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, for example, the church (meaning building and congregation/organization) will usually meet Wikipedia's requirements and a separate wikipedia article will be created about it. I would automatically add a link to the website of the current church organization occupying the building.

Browsing the history, that external link has been there a long time; I didn't track it down all the way but perhaps I added it. (You can search in history by the "Find addition/removal" tool at the top of what you see after selecting "View history".) In this edit you yourself added another external link to a subpage of the official website, adding to the already existing external link to the main webpage. That seems to indicate that back at that time, you thought an external link to the main page was fine.

I suspect you're just sorta panicking, sorta temporarily over-interpreting something there, because it looks fine to me. Do explain further if you like though. --Doncram (talk) 19:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Doncram, Thanks for taking a look. the External Link Church of the Creator going to http://www.churchofthecreator.com is the Official Site as you have determined. I am asking about the recent addition directly below "Authority control" and the links LCCN: n8208381 VIAF: 134890366 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n82083781 Sorry for not being more clear. I have no understanding of this entry, but, the links clearly go to the hate organization. Thank you. Michael S. Legions (talk) 13:45, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Okay, Michael S. Legions, now I see that indeed there is a bad problem. See Talk:Church of the Creator#Authority control / Library of Congress error, another horrible situation where i try to state the problem and ask User:Bellerophon5685 to help. However it seems to me that the problem is outside of Wikipedia, that it may be the Library of Congress's records which need to be corrected. But I don't really understand how authority control stuff works, besides that it is supposed to help clearly identify individuals, organizations etc. to avoid confusion. Here it seems to be the problem itself. Bellepheron5685 certainly is unaware of the issue, is not a malevolent actor here, and might or might not be able to help in any way. --Doncram (talk) 02:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Doncram Thank you for the clarifications. I will contact Bellepheron5685 and see if I can get some help. So appreciate your knowledge and assistance. Michael S. Legions (talk) 16:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Penn Wells Hotel has been accepted

Penn Wells Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Lauren Lakis

Hi Doncram! Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Lakis (2nd nomination) has been closed as Keep and improve. In the discussion you asked for any sources and reliable material from the original article deleted in 2012 to be moved over to the new article. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to have been any. The references are entirely from social media or blog posts so I'm not going to move any of the source material over. However, as per the discussion there should be enough material out there now to improve the article to the point where it won't get nominated again. Cheers, Aervanath (talk) 16:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Aervanath))), thanks, I guess, sort of, but I think it is unhelpful for you to comment about IMDB here if you are meaning to chide me; it would be better for you to comment in closing that others' statements about IMDB were stupid in fact (? is that too harsh, i don't really think so). As i clearly stated myself, IMDB can be reliable for what roles an actor has played, and complaining about the portions of IMDB where a person can contribute text about themselves is completely irrelevant. In that AFD and others people keep harping on one past mistake in IMDB or another, no doubt long ago resolved. As if Wikipedia and the New York Times and every source in the world has not had mistakes which were corrected later. And in this article and AFD there was not a single IMDB-supported assertion that anyone could call into question. So frankly, I think it is arrogant and unhelpful for people to simplisticly assert "imdb involved so delete". Thanks anyhow for closing the AFD correctly, and I do believe you mean well in coming here to communicate further with me. --Doncram (talk) 17:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Doncram, I certainly didn't mean the IMDb remark in my closing statement in any way that would cause personal offence, and I hope you take it as a general statement and not a personal one. I only posted on your talk page about the sources in the 2012 article (nothing there was from IMDb) since that's what you mentioned in the discussion. I also wouldn't cite Wikipedia as a reliable source for exactly the same reason as I wouldn't cite IMDb. I'm not saying that IMDb isn't highly valuable in its own way (it absolutely is, no question), but nothing there should be used to support notability on its own, and I wouldn't use information from there for an article unless I had another source for it. You are also correct, though, that the information there shouldn't be automatically disbelieved; my experience has also been that it's pretty reliable, and usually I can back up contested information from a different source. Cheers, Aervanath (talk) 17:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes, thanks, I should have said I do appreciate your responding to my request for an admin to review the 2012 article. --Doncram (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Articles and Talk:page comments

Hello, I'm Agljones. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Registered Buildings of the Isle of Man have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. agljones(talk)20:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Hey, Agljones, thanks maybe sort of, for your posting here. I'm a bit concerned that this implies notice that you may be about to try again to delete or refactor or otherwise change my edits at Talk:Registered Buildings of the Isle of Man. As you should have seen by now, I replied there in this diff to your last deletion/editing/movement of my comments, with my own assertion that I am kind of fed up, and I am inclined towards seeking action at wp:ANI to have you blocked or banned, temporarily or permanently, from Wikipedia.

Trying to assume good faith, though, I am willing to try to understand and consider what you might have to say now, here. Pray continue, please. I dunno, maybe we could talk in a basic way, exchanging views, about how article Talk pages are supposed to work. I mean this seriously, I am willing to try to exchange views civilly and allow for you to educate me about your perspectives, if you will likewise consider my views. --Doncram (talk) 22:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Registered Buildings of the Isle of Man. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. agljones(talk)Agljones (talk) 10:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as [[Talk:Registered Buildings of the Isle of Man]] are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages.

Addition of diffs is only an editor courtesy. Talk:Page procedures are only guidelines and not a policy. Requested clarifications may be seen by other editors as falling within the leeway of the guideline. Talk:page headers are clearly linked. Addition of date stamp is linked to different time zones and please request TEAHOUSE for recalling sections if there is an issue. The editor is requested not to create further sections as there is an active BRD discussion. There is saliently no issue of communication if the editor asks for a reversion, as it is a tacit admission the editor has read the different sections and diffs.(talk)11:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Registered Buildings of the Isle of Man for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. The editor USER:doncram should not introduce further talk:page sections after acknowledging a current BRD discussion or use the talk:page as a forum. The only consensus for the talk:page is that the discussion should be moved to this talk:page. Other editors may not consider team-tagging WP:TAGTEAM as a consensus from two different articles and a series of separate talk:page discussion. agljones(talk16:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Washington, Virginia; your edit of 29 October 220

You added the phrase "its historic district is 140 acres (57 ha)" with the explanation "historic district is much of the town but is not same. juxtapose sizes 140 acres vs. 182 acres". This is not correct. The entire town is considered to be the historic district. The figure of 140 acres comes from the 1975 application for the town to become a historic district; the acreage was only an estimate. A survey of the town boundaries was conducted in 1985 which found that the town contains 182 acres (Rappahannock County Plat Book 4, page 68)Harriswoodville (talk) 20:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

You sound like you know what you're talking about, very good. This is about the two articles Washington, Virginia (created 2002 by User:Ram-Man) and Washington Historic District (Washington, Virginia) (created in 2013 by User:Pubdog). If they are exactly the same area as you say, then the two topics should certainly be merged. And, okay, I just set up merger proposal. Thanks for your attention to this! --Doncram (talk) 21:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

There are now several entries in the discussion regarding merging Washington, Virginia and Washington (Virginia) Historic District. None of the entries supports your suggestion that these two Wikipedia entries be merged. Would you be willing to remove your proposal for merging these, as it is rather distracting to see this proposal when the entries are opened for reading.Harriswoodville (talk) 18:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Historic Hotels of America items

See Talk:Historic Hotels of America/Draft articles for list of 53 HHA articles that were removed to Draftspace after (evil) ANI proceeding. Status of each now indicated there; 5 other editors and myself have developed some of these, 12 have so far been restored to mainspace, and a few more are submitted at AFC. The removals to Draftspace en masse led to deletions and restorations of a bunch of them; 7 under request to be restored again now (showing in this 22 December version of Requests for Undeletion page). --Doncram (talk) 02:46, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Queensbury Hotel

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Queensbury Hotel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

As one of the Historic Hotels of America (a program of the National Trust for Historic Preservation), it's a notable topic. Speedy deletion tag removed. Minor development done. --Doncram (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Atherton Hotel at Oklahoma State University

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Atherton Hotel at Oklahoma State University".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

As one of the Historic Hotels of America (a program of the National Trust for Historic Preservation), it's a notable topic. Speedy deletion tag removed. Some development including coords, photo just done, and submitted under AFC. --Doncram (talk) 22:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Concord's Colonial Inn

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Concord's Colonial Inn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:NOPSI New Orleans

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NOPSI New Orleans".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

At 02:02, 22 November 2020 I requested to UnitedStatesian that they address Historic Hotels of America items in one group; they replied and advised to edit each of the ones which might come up for speedy deletion. Not sure how to catch all of those, but I found Category:Content moved from mainspace to draftspace from May 2020 and browsed that for items with "hotel" or "inn". By either substantial or not-very-substantial edit, I revised at:

1. Draft:Silver Birches (hotel)
2. Draft:The Queensbury Hotel
3. Draft:The Cotton Sail Hotel
4. Draft:Terrace Hotel (Lakeland, Florida)
5. Draft:The Saint Paul Hotel
6. Draft:Royal Palms Resort and Spa
7. Draft:Newport Beach Hotel & Suites
8. Draft:National Hotel (Miami Beach, Florida)
9. Draft:River Street Inn
10. Draft:Omni Bretton Arms Inn --Restored to mainspace, merged to Mount Washington Hotel. Omni Bretton Arms Inn now redirects to its section.
11. Draft:Norwich Inn
12. Draft:Partridge Inn
13. Draft:Napa River Inn
14. Draft:Jefferson Clinton Hotel
15. Draft:Greystone Hotel
16. Draft:Kendall Hotel
17. Draft:Hotel Viking (Newport, Rhode Island)
18. Draft:Hotel on Phillips
19. Draft:Hotel Lombardy
20. Draft:Hotel Brexton
21. Draft:Greystone Hotel
22. Draft:Kings Courtyard Inn
23. Draft:Georgetown Inn
24. Draft:Belleview Inn
25. Draft:Crockett Hotel
26. Draft:Admiral Hotel (Mobile, Alabama)
27. Draft:Concord's Colonial Inn

Perhaps there are some more without "hotel" or "inn" in their name; I noticed and revised just one of those. There were more originally in that group but others and I have edited and moved them to mainspace. As far as I know only NOPSI New Orleans was deleted, following UnitedStatesian's putting it into play.

User:UnitedStatesian, can you point me to any others? Or show me how to find them, perhaps in some category of AFC items eligible for speedy deletion because they have not been edited recently? --Doncram (talk) 22:29, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

I use that same category; I think there are 8 others that you may want to edit too:

1. Draft:The Edgewater (Madison, Wisconsin)
2. Draft:Wentworth Mansion Developed somewhat by me; restored to mainspace 2020-12-17. --Doncram (talk) 06:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
3. Draft:The Dewberry
4. Draft:The Sherman (Batesville, Indiana)
5. Draft:Hilton Orrington/Evanston
6. Draft:Casa Faena
7. Draft:Tubac Golf Resort and Spa
8. Draft:The Wigwam (Litchfield Park, Arizona)

UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks User:UnitedStatesian, i did edit at those including by this minor change at Casa Faena one, and that seems to have put off the recent forces/problem. By the way, I rather do think these are all Wikipedia-notable, based on my experience with the more-developed ones and general experience with similar historic sites, but substantial development of all the articles can require more digging than I'm immediately ready to do and/or local lit search access which is not currently convenient/available to me. --Doncram (talk) 02:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

There were 7 more that were missed and were deleted. Restorations requested; see summary linked from beginning of big section in which this is now a subsection. --Doncram (talk) 02:46, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your advice on Vitaliy Katsenelson’s article

Hi, please take a look at Draft:Vitaliy Katsenelson. It is a properly declared WP:COI contribution about a value investing book author. Since you are a member of WP:FINANCE and also have a profound experience of editing Wikipedia, I decided to ask for your advice. What do you think of this contribution, what can be improved? Thanks! Peter. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 14:01, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Registered Buildings of the Isle of Man

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.agljones(talk)10:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Umm, Agljones, by your statement here inviting me to leave a message on your Talk page mean that you rescind your previous request(s) that I do not leave messages on your Talk page? I hesitate to believe that; please clarify.

Agljones and others, please do comment at Talk:Registered Buildings of the Isle of Man#Request for comments on Kate's Cottage coverage (which I just opened). I am considering whether to list that discussion formally as a wp:RFC or not. I am afraid doing so would waste attention of hundreds of editors who then would consider commenting, because frankly it is so minor and it might seem to you, Agljones, that you were being beaten up about it, that you would be receiving too much feedback all at once. But I will take into consideration your opinion about that, if you would comment here: would you welcome, or would you be embarrassed by, wide feedback on that? --Doncram (talk) 14:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Registered Buildings and Conservations Areas of the Isle of Man

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Registered Buildings and Conservations Areas of the Isle of Man, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use your sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. The editor USER:doncram has received a warning in respect to "that further creation of articles based on directory-style resource may lead to other sanctions" by the editor User:Barkeep49 on the 14th May 2020. The previous warning content directive by editor USER:T. Canens of the 20 June 2011 (UTC) Wikipedia: Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive224 [[1]] applies to the removal of "Doncram created content" which may apply to this article. agljones(talk)09:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of bridges carrying buildings has been accepted

List of bridges carrying buildings, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 21:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Ohio Barnstar of Merit

I would like to award Doncram with the Ohio Barnstar of Merit.

		The Ohio Barnstar of Merit
		For his selfless work helping me create the page for the George and Christina Ealy House
		this WikiAward was given to Doncram by OSUBuckeyeFan (talk) on 14:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm glad you found my participation helpful! --Doncram (talk) 15:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

No. 117 Kate's Cottage, Isle of Man

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Registered Buildings and Conservations Areas of the Isle of Man, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.}agljones(talk)10:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Registered Buildings and Conservations Areas of the Isle of Man. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

In respect to also this article Kate's Cottage, Isle of Man there is no evidence of building identified as No 117 (Kates Cottage) being built or occupied in this form during the period 1800-1899. Building commissioned and built 1902-1905 and extended period 1905-1922. This has been discussed at this talk:page section with edit of the 21st April 2018 [2] , 28th November 2020 [3] and the 7th December [4].

Issues in respect to accuracy are highlighted by another editor in this edit of 10th April 2018 [5] in respect to checking with another source and this edit of 14th December 2020 [6] and any facts in any source are subject to the process of independent verifiability WP:V and burden of proof lies with any editor adding or removing text WP:BURDEN. There is no issue of edit warring in respect to "Doncram created content" in regard to the directive from T. Canens 20 June 2011 (UTC) Wikipedia: Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive224 [[7]] which also includes refactoring the name of the subject from Kate's Cottage to Kate's House in a link form in this edits 4th April 2015 [8] and this edit of the 27th October 2019 [9]].

There is no editor consensus in the incorrect use of a source or the use of team-tagging. The reason for the inclusion of No 117 is not actually due to the age of the building but as an area of scenic value and the edit box should be left blank (see edit 29 November 2020 [10]). The under-lying legislation actually protects No 117 without the need to be included on the register (see Eastern Area Planning (Isle of Man) policy for 2019/2020). The legislation also includes the protecting of the buildings in the Conservation Zones which are not registered and not subject to Registered Building Consent and the inclusion of the zones in this article may suggest Original Research WP:OR. agljones(talk)10:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Named corners of raceways has been nominated for renaming

Category:Named corners of raceways has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 12:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Doncram, this nomination was not intended to offend you or pour salt in an open wound. As soon as you let me know the category had been purged out of process, I struck the options to delete the categories and pinged the one "Delete" !vote to reconsider (which they just did). The remaining rename proposal is pretty routine and would keep both categories. Whether it passes or not, thank you for your contributions! - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:10, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, RevelationDirect, for your concern. No offense taken, no salt perceived. The Isle of Man subcategory was indeed deficient, with just one member, either because the category might have been removed or possibly because I never applied it properly (and actually now looking at one example, i see i had not added it, tho i am not studying it all out). And I do appreciate your responsiveness in changing your proposal, too. I'm sorry if my responding comes across as too curt or too strongly stated somehow, about the renaming aspect. I have to muse about your suggested use of word "individual" to get at the intended meaning. About past stuff I alluded to, that could be a factor in my state of mind; drama (entirely unrelated to you or anyone else in that CFD afaik) has reared up again at Registered Buildings and Conservations Areas of the Isle of Man, likely requiring wp:ANI unpleasantness. --Doncram (talk) 02:12, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the thoughtful reply. All the best. - RevelationDirect (talk) 02:18, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ortoire (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ortoire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ortoire, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:16, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Notes:

Draft:Ortoire created while partipating in CFD Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_December_13#Category:Archaeological_type_sites, which happens to appear just below CFD on "Category:Named corners of raceways" for which i received notice.

Ortoire is currently (since 2007) a redirect to Ortoire River, whose drainage forms much of southeast Trinidad, and it is presumable that the archeological site is indeed on the river.

It should be an article, or perhaps Ortoire should be a redirect to coverage/mention of the site in Ortoiroid people article where I got the main source (but which i am unable to consult, myself). The Banwari Trace article mentions the "Ortoire assemblage", a set of artifacts presumably from the Ortoire site, and refers to it being "much later ca BC 1000, and located in southeast Trinidad." Also see/use this source, but it is oddly a black history month article, probably summarizing/repeating from elsewhere. And this academic article PDF about St Johns' Ortoiroid midden site in Trinidad (History in Action journal, title="Marine Subsistence at St. John Site in Trinidad: A Preliminary Study", by Zara Ali). --Doncram (talk) 01:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

I added several sources to demonstrate it is notable. I can't move it because of the redirect. You can resubmit for review, or I can do a copy/paste to Ortoire. Do you have a preference? MB 02:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

User:MB, thanks so much! I copied/edited notes above over to its Talk page, and I just revised the mainspace Ortoire to be a disambiguation page rather than a redirect to Ortoire River. If you approve of the draft article (presumably you do, and I agree it is good now, and I presume it would not be much improved by any more AFC reviewing) it would be great if you'd move it to Ortoire (archeological site). I did hit "submit" but presumably you can cancel that. There are now about 3 inbound links to Ortoire (archeological site). Thank you for watching and stepping in to help very substantially! --Doncram (talk) 19:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

You probably noticed this was done. I do agree you should have added more sources before submitting the original article - one source is not enough to show notability. But it was easy to find a few more so there is no doubt this site qualifies. You also created the dab before I had a chance to move the article, and that was quickly un-done. Again, it seems you are rushing a bit too much lately; you used to caution me about under-sourcing :) I restored the dab, but other editors have changed it so that the base title still redirects to the river and the dab is referenced in a hatnote there. I think it is plausible that the river is the PT, so I think that is OK.

I also found this government listing that says Ortoire is a village. It is written more like an essay, but since it is a Trinidad govt website it would appear enough to make an article on the village per GEOLAND. It could be linked from the dab and List of schools in Trinidad and Tobago. I found a county map that show the extent of Mayaro County, and the county articles says it is divided into two wards (neither called Ortoire) - so I would remove the ward entirely from the dab and replace it with the village. Do you want to create a village article or should I? MB 18:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

what, "you used to caution me about under-sourcing"? i don't recall. probably we all long remember criticisms about ourselves, explicit or implied, fair or not fair, much more reliably than we remember dishing them out; i'm sure that's the case for me. sorry! --Doncram (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Argh, i wrote a substantial response but lost it (my current computer seems unusually sensitive to static electricity, too often shuts partway off and loses any unsaved edit).

Briefly: User:MB, go ahead and create an Ortoire-as-an-area type article if you feel you're ready to do that. I don't yet see specific evidence Ortoire is a legal village. That account you found seems too informal to characterize the hamlet that exists on the south/east side of the river there to be a village. Google Maps, when you select "Ortoire, Trinidad and Tobago", highlights a larger area which must be an official administrative division of some type, which might be an official village. It includes the hamlet and more, including going out to the tip of Point Radix. That informal account suggests Point Radix is "adjoining" but not part of the village. (You are probably right, though, that there's enough evidence to create an article about the place at least as a hamlet or unincorporated area sometimes known as village of Ortoire....and, oh, there is this Facebook page of an "Ortoire Village Council", established 1952 or 1954 per its "About". [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBoF8Pjb8so this youtube video "Ortoire Village Mayaro" portrays locations on both sides of river, is not evidence about anything really, but might be included as an external link. --Doncram (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC))

About rushing or not, your suggestion is at least arguable, but I don't perceive much if any downside to hitting "submit" on any new Draft-space article, as that might round up AFC editor help developing the article, and there is a 3 month waiting list. It is unusual, even "weird" that an editor showed up there immediately and also was unhelpful. About creating the disambiguation page, I see the problem being User:Lithopsian's uninformed action. They could have questioned the likelihood of then-draft Ortoire (archeological site) getting to mainspace, instead by raising question at Talk page of the dab, and could have asked what "Ortoire" commonly means. From what I already knew, "Ortoire" in common usage seems most often to refers to an area, perhaps a village, and it does not refer to Ortoire River, which is what their action (erroneously in my view) reinstated. By the way an article where link to an area is needed is article on politician Franklin Khan, before and currently linking to the river when an area is intended instead.

Sorry if this may come across as grumpy to either MB or Lithopsian; i actually don't intend that or feel grumpy about anything besides having lost what I had more pleasantly explained out. Maybe i'll reconstruct/say more later. --Doncram (talk) 19:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Article created on the village. Very short, couldn't find much - most hits were for a seafood restaurant there. Added it to the dab, and it has four incoming links. Also added another link to the arch. site (in a history article). The "ward" is correct - it is one of five wards in Victoria county - named because the river originates there. The "counties" are just historical now - they have been replaced with "regions", but many WP articles refer to the counties in the present. There is also a Ortoire/Mayaro seat in the Parliament - but not sure if that is the whole county/region or what. I think I am done now, feel free to add anything you found. MB 05:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Found a bit more. The area highlighted on google maps is the Ortoire Municipal Corporation boundary which includes the village and surrounding area including Point Radix. It is one of subdivisions of the Mayaro–Rio Claro Regional Corporation which, in 1991, replaced Mayaro County as one of the political subdivisions of the county. Also added the census population. Definitely a real place. MB 15:05, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wentworth Mansion (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wentworth Mansion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wentworth Mansion, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 05:12, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

I replied with edits at the article and explanation at Talk:Wentworth Mansion. --Doncram (talk) 06:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Wentworth Mansion has been accepted

Wentworth Mansion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 06:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! --Doncram (talk) 06:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crockett Hotel has been accepted

Crockett Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

NRHP updates

Hi - not sure how much either of us will have responses to these update proposals... So far there hasn't been much? If you know people to direct the comments to that could help, or we could try some implementation as nearly the only interested parties... One other thought is that {{NRHP url}} and {{NHLS url}} need an option to extract from NARA instead of NPS, and also need a display option that just provides the refnum. ɱ (talk) 14:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Glerbo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Glerbo, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JTtheOG (talk) 01:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

This relates to Template talk:Db-meta#help end the madness 2. The contents at Glerbo are:

Editor/administrator: please do not delete this page.

This is a very temporary test page. Testing in User: space does not work, it seems this test needs to be in a mainspace page.

Please see discussion at Template talk:Db-meta#help end the madness 2

Of course it wasn't hurting anything, but I won't contest its deletion. Bureaucratic forces are what they are. --Doncram (talk) 01:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Walter Elmer Schofield, Across the River (1904), Carnegie Museum of Art.		Best wishes for a safe, healthy and prosperous 2021.
		Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 13:52, 26 December 2020 (UTC) Oneupsmanship: This painting turned the friendly rivalry between Edward Redfield and Elmer Schofield into a feud. Schofield was a frequent houseguest at Redfield's farm, upstream from New Hope, Pennsylvania, and the two would go out painting together, competing to capture the better view. Redfield served on the jury for the 1904 Annual Exhibition of the Carnegie Institute; at which, despite Redfield's opposition, Across the River was awarded the Gold Medal and $1,500 prize. It was not until a 1963 interview that the 93-year-old Redfield revealed the painting as the cause of the 40-year feud between them. Schofield may have painted it in England, but a blindsided Redfield knew that it was a view of the Delaware River, from his own front yard!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Newtown Elementary School has been accepted

Newtown Elementary School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 14:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey Doncram, its an honor to meet an NRHP article creator. I, myself work on nonexisting NRHP subjects. Check out my latest one - Draft:Benjamin F. Wade House, created it 30 mins ago. - Hatchens (talk) 14:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roswell Historic District (Roswell, Georgia) has been accepted

Roswell Historic District (Roswell, Georgia), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Terrell Homeplace has been accepted

William Terrell Homeplace, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glover-McLeod-Garrison House has been accepted

Glover-McLeod-Garrison House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Amkgp 💬 19:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walters-Davis House has been accepted

Walters-Davis House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eyebeller 23:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Candler Street School has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Candler Street School. Thanks! Eyebeller 23:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hall County Jail has been accepted

Hall County Jail, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eyebeller 23:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kirk Hotel (Tooele, Utah) has been accepted

Kirk Hotel (Tooele, Utah), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eyebeller 09:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fetz-Keller Ranch has been accepted

Fetz-Keller Ranch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~SS49~ {talk} 12:23, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clermont Residential Historic District has been accepted

Clermont Residential Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~SS49~ {talk} 12:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Candler Street School has been accepted

Candler Street School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Washington Virginia and Washington Historic District

Dear Doncram, I am writing to you today in regard to your recommendation that the Washington Historic District Wikipedia page be combined with the Washington, Virginia page. First, I would like to acknowledge all the work you have done on ensuring that National Historic Register sites are present in Wikipedia. I know this has entailed a great deal of effort on your part, and I am grateful to you for this. I am a new editor of Wikipedia and I have focused my efforts on improving the historical accuracy of Wikipedia pages that relate to Rappahannock County, Virginia. I am a historian living in this County, and I have 14 years of experience in researching the history of the County. In 2019, I published a book titled “Washington, Virginia, A History, 1735-2018” that has been accepted to be in the collections of the Library of Virginia and the Library of Congress. This is only one of my publications related to Rappahannock County. On 30 January 2020 and 6 February 2020 I rewrote the Wikipedia page on Washington, Virginia, documenting it with 24 references. To my consternation, I discovered that the editor Nyttend had completely deleted all my changes on 8 March 2020, because he/she believed that it was a “promotional brochure.” I appealed to Nyttend, but received no answer. Fortunately another editor, APK, saw my appeal, did not agree with Nyttend’s deletion, and reinserted my original text. Subsequently, other editors have changed my text, inserting inaccurate information that I had to correct. I also rewrote the Washington Historic District page and later found that other editors have also changed this page. Now, you have recommended that the Washington, Virginia page be combined with the Washington Historic District page. I hope you can understand my distress that my efforts to provide historically accurate content in Wikipedia have been very frustrating. I believe strongly that the Wikipedia page on the town of Washington Virginia should not be combined with the page on the Washington Historic District. I am hoping that you might withdraw your recommendation.Harriswoodville (talk) 20:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jarrett-Hayes House has been accepted

Jarrett-Hayes House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:53, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Healdsburg Carnegie Library has been accepted

Healdsburg Carnegie Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baker House (Sea Ranch, California) has been accepted

Baker House (Sea Ranch, California), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grey Columns has been accepted

Grey Columns, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atherton Hotel at Oklahoma State University has been accepted

Atherton Hotel at Oklahoma State University, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

List of historical landmarks in Healdsburg, California

Please check the talk on this. The City Code and the Healdsburg Tribune, Enterprise and Scimitar sources are identified. Thanks.MikeVdP (talk) 00:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

User:MikeVdP, at the ongoing AFD, it would be very appropriate to provide references that could be used in the article. It is okay to argue that valid references exist, e.g. a, b, c, etc., even if they are not yet used in the article.

I don't see, I don't know what you mean by those 3 or 4 sources you refer to here, so please clarify at the AFD. At the Talk page, there is a link to one 1985(?) source, from which I copy-paste:

"HISTORIC — Adopted on second reading an Historic Building Ordinance requiring permits for the construction, alteration or demolition of any designated historic building or of any building within a historic district. The ordinance named the Gobbi Building at 310-316 Center Street and the Carnegie library at 221 Matheson Street as historic buildings, and cited Johnson Street between Piper and Powell and Matheson Street between East and First streets as historic districts. The Design Review Commission was named as the Historic Committee, which will handle applications for the permits. DRC actions may be appealed to the City Council."

(Whatever that is might or might not be sufficient or reliable, maybe it could be explained what it is. I acknowledge it does seem to be helpful towards establishing there is or was a real government program which has real preservation effect, i.e. requires special permits before a building designated historic can be altered. (However, does that Historic Committee actually exist now, is it covered in current city code, I wonder?) Anyhow that is definitely more substantial than a local historical society naming properties onto a list of places they like, without having any specific preservation power. By all means, do state any of this at the AFD, including you can copy-paste the above quote if you like. I am in the position that I nominated it for deletion, though, and I am arguing for it to be deleted (or moved to Draftspace). --Doncram (talk) 00:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Loth Hall remove discussion

That was an excellent point. The person threw an insult that bounced right back at him. Thank you Rybkovich (talk) 05:22, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey Doncram, can I ask you for favor to do a quick look over the other Berkeley Student Cooperative house pages - Kingman Hall, Casa Zimbabwe, Cloyne Court Hotel, and Stebbins Hall (I lived in Stebbins), all but one (Kingman Hall that I resuscitated) are members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject California and Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperatives, is there any real chance that another editor may feel that one or two should be deleted? I was thinking of mentioning them in the Lothlorian Hall intro partially to show that having an article re individual house within the Berkeley co-op system is not that extraordinary as at might seem at first, but was hesitant of doing that because it may not be worth a chance of someone feeling that they should neither be up. I know that Cloyne is a US historic landmark so should be safe, but Casa Zimbabwe and Stebbins? Stebbins Claim to fame is that it is the first female coop, while CZ is one of the first coed housings and the first intentionally built co-op. Kingman Hall is only a Berkeley land mark so Im not sure that it can hold its own at this stage. Also I thought about what you said re joining a project and since Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperatives is inactive I'm now thinking of reviving it after I'm done with upgrading Berkeley co-ops. Thank you Rybkovich (talk) 23:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Green Shutters has been accepted

Green Shutters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Amkgp 💬 14:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James H. and Frances E. Laughlin House has been accepted

James H. and Frances E. Laughlin House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Logia Masónica Hijos de la Luz has been accepted

Logia Masónica Hijos de la Luz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 13:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cunningham-Hembree Estate has been accepted

Cunningham-Hembree Estate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thanks for your justice on Wikipedia. You found the best way of my problem. Phoela14 (talk) 21:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

If you weren't already aware, you should have a look here. Grandpallama (talk) 23:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Z Street for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Z Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Z Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of X Street (disambiguation)

Hello Doncram,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, X Street (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of W Street (disambiguation)

Hello Doncram,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, W Street (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Y Street (disambiguation)

Hello Doncram,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Y Street (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of V Street (disambiguation)

Hello Doncram,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, V Street (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of T Street (disambiguation)

Hello Doncram,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, T Street (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of S Street (disambiguation)

Hello Doncram,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, S Street (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of R Street (disambiguation)

Hello Doncram,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, R Street (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Q Street (disambiguation)

Hello Doncram,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Q Street (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of P Street (disambiguation)

Hello Doncram,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, P Street (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of O Street (disambiguation)

Hello Doncram,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, O Street (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

East Avenue

Hi Doncram. I see you recently turned East Avenue from a redirect to a disambiguation page. I wonder if it makes sense to have this page at all since we have no article about an East Avenue. A quick Google search finds plenty of East Avenues all over the world, none of which has been deemed notable enough for a standalone article so listing three of them seems pretty arbitrary. Thoughts? Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 22:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

• Well there is one direct link now (was omitted by editing error by me I guess, just fixed). It does seem useful to have a disambiguation page for this common term, and to add links. --Doncram (talk) 22:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
• Pichpich, now there are 3 bluelinks related to Rochester, New York, and also there is East Avenue, Quezon City. It is arguable, I grant, whether selected mentions of other East Avenues in other locales, without bluelinks, are very helpful, because it is a random selection. My intention was to convey it is a common term. --Doncram (talk) 22:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

  Doncram, I hadn't noticed East Avenue, Quezon City but I think this is sufficient for a dab page since there are actual articles that we can point to. I've removed the two East Avenues listed that do not have a corresponding article. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 22:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wascom House has been accepted

Wascom House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 05:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nichols House (Ponchatoula, Louisiana) has been accepted

Nichols House (Ponchatoula, Louisiana), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 06:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oaks Hotel has been accepted

Oaks Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 08:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Your work-related to NRHP places is simply awesome. Hatchens (talk) 08:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

"Z Street (Portland, Oregon)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Z Street (Portland, Oregon). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 6#Z Street (Portland, Oregon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. John B123 (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Two-room schoolhouse (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Two-room schoolhouse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Two-room schoolhouse, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lacombe School has been accepted

Lacombe School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick House (Covington, Louisiana) has been accepted

Frederick House (Covington, Louisiana), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Two-room schoolhouse has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Two-room schoolhouse. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bertus-Ducatel House has been accepted

Bertus-Ducatel House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Please help me

Dear, I’m now unhappy to create articles because user:CommanderWaterford, a vindictive user, have added negative tags on every articles that I created. Do justice to me? Please help me... Please. Taung Tan (talk) 15:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Church Of The Creator Reference - links fix or modify

--Doncram (talk) 02:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC) Thank you for adding the comments “Authority control / Library of Congress error, another horrible situation” As I read the References section on the Article Page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_the_Creator

I found links not working or needing modification in my opinion. Should not require any adjustment of placement [reference #] within the Article text. I logged into see if I could [edit] the References myself, but [edit] brings up a blank page, I realized I had no idea how to do this correctly.

Below is the numeric list and modifications that should help a user get to relevant information online. Pacer has recently changed their rules and the .pdf links no longer work. From your talk page I can see you have a lot of plates spinning. However, standing up to bullies, holding then accountable, in the USA, and around the world is on the agenda of every human being, what is the right thing to do? This example on our part, now 21 years, after filing the Complaint is more relevant than ever.

Below are the adjustments, modifications and links suggested for edit for someone who can do it correctly. Thank you for considering this request.

Content 3. - References [bottom of page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_the_Creator list by #]

1. Summary ® Trademark Litigation Cases, Circuit, Federal, and US Supreme Court. [best hyperlink: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/392/248/598168/ ]

2. Works correctly no change

3. Works correctly no change

4. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. TE-TA-MA TRUTH FOUNDATION-FAMILY OF URI, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORLD CHURCH OF THE CREATOR, Defendant-Appellee. No. 02-1381. Decided: July 25, 2002 [best hyperlink: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1260486.html ]

5. Ok as is.

6. Ok as is.

7. See Google books excerpt [ https://books.google.com/books?id=WA12nHRtmAwC&pg=PA91&lpg=PA91&dq=james+germain+uri&source=bl&ots=RL0fe3iWcL&sig=UzXYUQpVySQAFbd77epgesKOliE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_tugVMD6AYOaNoS5hPgH&ved=0CFsQ6AEwDQ#v=onepage&q=church%20of%20the%20creator&f=false ] George D. Chryssides (2001). Historical Dictionary of New Religious Movements

God Bless you and keep up the good works! Michael S. Legions (talk) 14:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

List of Historic Landmarks in Healdsburg, California

Is it Wikipedia policy that historic landmark buildings and districts in Healdsburg cannot be included on Wikipedia? There seem to be many international, federal, state, county and city designations and the listings for most do appear on Wikipedia articles. What makes Healdsburg (uniquely?) worthy of being cut? Please explain.MikeVdP (talk) 05:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

I am replying at User talk:MikeVdP#Nomination of List of historical landmarks in Healdsburg, California for deletion. --Doncram (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Sonoma County Historic Landmarks and Districts

Please see the talk page for this article. The listings for #178 to #192 were removed. I think this was your removal of those entries. Is that intentional? This article was created in March 2018 by Missvain. Is there a problem with it? MikeVdP (talk) 05:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Will you be fixing this? Thanks.MikeVdP (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Will be replying to your inquiry. Addressing Healdburg stuff and what I perceive to be some problematic practices of yours in Wikipedia in application there, first, as you are aware of. But I will reply substantially to this separate inquiry, soon. Gotta run now. --Doncram (talk) 17:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Avenue Z (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Avenue Z (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Natg 19 (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A Street (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A Street (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Natg 19 (talk) 01:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of C Street (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on C Street (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Natg 19 (talk) 05:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of G Street (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on G Street (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Natg 19 (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Calhoun Downtown Historic District has been accepted

Calhoun Downtown Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgia Marble Company and Tate Historic District has been accepted

Georgia Marble Company and Tate Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of R Street (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R Street (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R Street (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Natg 19 (talk) 06:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of P Street (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P Street (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P Street (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Natg 19 (talk) 06:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Tifton Commercial Historic District PDF

Tifton Commercial Historic District map

Tifton City Hall (former Myon Hotel), a really nice pic from 2005, contributed in 2008, maybe ur first?

I created the Tifton Commercial Historic District pdf. Let me know if you think it needs to be changed. --Mjrmtg (talk) 23:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Mjrmtg, thank you for creating that map! And I think that means you also contributed a number of photos in the area. About the map, when I put it in I wasn't sure if it covered just the original Tifton Commercial Historic District or whether it also covered the expanded, boundary-increased area. But looking at the maps on the last pages of the two NRHP text documents, it seems to me that it is the combo, complete area, which is what is needed. It would be nice if the map's documentation at Commons stated which it was, clearly, maybe I can help edit there. It wouldn't hurt, but it also wouldn't help too very much, if the map also indicated which part was from the original listing vs. which was the increase. I am not familiar with how to create maps, I am glad that you and others do it. I think I have seen some created with outlines on OpenStreetMap backgrounds, which were pretty good.

Any which way you'd like, it would be great if you could create a map about the Tifton Residential Historic District, which you have probably seen me working on, currently at Draft:Tifton Residential Historic District. The last page of its text document has a sketch map which is poor in terms of its geography (compare to detailed map which is in the last page of the big National Archives-hosted 228 page document), but is interesting for using color-coding to indicate age by decade of various subareas. I dunno if you could do anything like that easily, or whether it is worth trying to indicate subareas at all.

Any which way, thank you so much for your contributions! --Doncram (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

I like the map! Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 00:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks - I'll see what I can do as far as maps for both Historic Districts. --Mjrmtg (talk) 02:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Mjrmtg, thanks for adding pics of the Tifton Coca-Cola building (taken on and/or uploaded 21 February 2021, I see) to the Tifton Residential HD article. I'm adding one of the pics also to the List of Coca-Cola buildings and structures, too! --Doncram (talk) 04:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Hebron Baptist Church has been accepted

New Hebron Baptist Church, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 23:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. James W. Daniel House (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. James W. Daniel House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dr. James W. Daniel House, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GeneralPoxter (talk) 04:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

GeneralPoxter, i think it was okay for mainspace, but, yeah, it was a bit minimalist. Thank you User:MB for developing it further about its specific significance and promoting it to mainspace. --Doncram (talk) 04:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitchell J. Green Plantation has been accepted

Mitchell J. Green Plantation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GeneralPoxter (talk) 20:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norbeck-Nicholson Carriage House has been accepted

Norbeck-Nicholson Carriage House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GeneralPoxter (talk) 16:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tifton Residential Historic District has been accepted

Tifton Residential Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GeneralPoxter (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donaldson-Bannister House and Cemetery has been accepted

Donaldson-Bannister House and Cemetery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GeneralPoxter (talk) 01:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crescent Farm has been accepted

Crescent Farm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GeneralPoxter (talk) 01:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davis-Felton Plantation has been accepted

I prematurely refreshed during the acceptance process, so a notification didn't make it here to your talk page. GeneralPoxter (talk) 01:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Casa Faena has been accepted

Casa Faena, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GeneralPoxter (talk) 19:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Griffin's Bakery has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Griffin's Bakery. Thanks! CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

CommanderWaterford, thank you for your careful attention paid to this submission and others. Your identifications of issues of fact and presentation help towards better development of articles. And keeps me on my toes a bit! I see you've now accepted it for AFC, thanks! --Doncram (talk) 20:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Doncram, thank you very much, this means a lot to me. Read your user page a minute ago - impressive work. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Griffin's Bakery has been accepted

Griffin's Bakery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

PDF Viewers ;)

PDF Viewer search was "Begins with..:" not "Contains" ... ;-) Thanks for the hint. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel Lombardy (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pahunkat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hotel Lombardy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hotel Lombardy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pahunkat (talk) 09:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madisonville Bank has been accepted

Madisonville Bank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Gap Bridge has been accepted

Black Gap Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claiborne Cottage Hotel has been accepted

Claiborne Cottage Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ashleyyoursmile! 09:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rex Mill has been accepted

Rex Mill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 18:15, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madisonville Town Hall has been accepted

Madisonville Town Hall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NYCLcolor

Template:NYCLcolor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barrio El Membrillo Historic District has been accepted

Barrio El Membrillo Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 11:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harvey Power Plant has been accepted

Harvey Power Plant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coronado Hotel has been accepted

Coronado Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Casa Juan Paisano has been accepted

Casa Juan Paisano, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morel-Nott House has been accepted

Morel-Nott House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cherie Quarters Cabins has been accepted

Cherie Quarters Cabins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 05:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pointe Coupee Parish Courthouse has been accepted

Pointe Coupee Parish Courthouse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 06:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samson House has been accepted

Samson House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 06:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Pointe Coupee Banner (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Pointe Coupee Banner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Pointe Coupee Banner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Satterfield Motor Company Building has been accepted

Satterfield Motor Company Building, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hypolite Bordelon House has been accepted

Hypolite Bordelon House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avoyelles High School has been accepted

Avoyelles High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

• Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

HD CP

Hey, I found one of your articles, Austin and Northwestern Railroad Historic District-Fairland to Llano is related to Antlers Hotel (Kingsland, Texas). It looks like the Antlers is the hotel in the district. The articles should link to each other, and the Antlers should have a NRHP CP infobox. I don't know how busy you are currently.... MB 04:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks User:MB for seeing the relatedness and letting me know. I have added the NRHP CP infobox and linked the two articles together. Probably the section titled "Antlers Historic Railroad District" could/should be edited down to only cover the NRHP historic district, because I see no info about any local or other historic district of that name, but I leave that to you or other future editors who may be able to sort it out more exactly. Both articles are definitely better now though. Thanks! --Doncram (talk) 02:24, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

OK, I merged what you wrote with what was there to make it a more cohesive description of the hotel in NRHP context. If it looks good to you, we can copy/paste that section (except maybe the last para on the Section Master house) to the district article. Go ahead and do that if you agree - it would double the size of the article. MB 04:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse (Reno, Nevada) has been accepted

Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse (Reno, Nevada), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bordelonville Floodgate has been accepted

Bordelonville Floodgate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noah ^💬 17:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dell Potter Ranch House has been accepted

Dell Potter Ranch House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 06:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hahns Peak Schoolhouse has been accepted

Hahns Peak Schoolhouse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benjamin F. Billingsley House has been accepted

Benjamin F. Billingsley House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:26, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Bell Mercantile has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bell Mercantile. Thanks! CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi User:CommanderWaterford, thank you for reviewing a number of my AFC submissions recently and many more in the past. About your comment, that the NPS digital search doesn't return anything for this place:

• At search screen here, I do see that searching on "Bell Mercantile" yields a "Bell House" and numerous other places with either "Bell" or "Mercantile" in their names are listed, in what appears to me to be a random order. But actually i do see the place down in the 20th position or so.
• Right now I don't see how to get the "geography restriction" to work to select "Colorado" to restrict the search to just this state, which you might have tried. But also perhaps you were at a different interface? Anyhow, the text and photos documents linked from the article, which I found differently, are located at the National Park Service. They're probably also available from the National Archives.
• On the interface linked above, if you click on "All words" rather than the default "Any words", the results are better, just two places with both words in their name.

Thanks again for your reviews and edits.--Doncram (talk) 16:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bell Mercantile has been accepted

Bell Mercantile, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:39, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bridge over Arkansas River has been accepted

Bridge over Arkansas River, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maysville School has been accepted

Maysville School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 04:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Maxwell Park School has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maxwell Park School. Thanks! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:06, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for notification. I replied there. --Doncram (talk) 04:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks CommanderWaterford for considering my comments there and, I guess, coming around to seeing the quote is okay, because you approved the article. The article was improved by your questioning it, I do believe, because it is better now giving some indication to the reader about who made the quoted statement (a Kelly, longtime resident and owner of the nearby Kelly Ranch, where many of the teachers at Maxwell School stayed, and which has a related building also constructed from the unusual cement blocks). So the quote is more interesting coming from her, which I had unconsciously felt but hadn't conveyed. Thanks! --Doncram (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gas Creek School has been accepted

Gas Creek School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poncha Springs Schoolhouse has been accepted

Poncha Springs Schoolhouse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Try for 3 sources

Hey Doncram! Thank you for all your hard work on NHRP articles! I would be happy to accept many of these drafts. Can I just as that you at least try to find WP:THREE sources for each article? That and reliable sources will save me grief from new-page patrollers who criticize us for accepting articles they don't believe are ready. Bkissin (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Bkissin, thanks for letting me know of that pressure. Sounds similar to missplaced concerns elsewhere that I have seen, which can have detrimental effects. I'll make an effort that way, and already did add a reference or two at a couple articles in draft format (like Manhattan Hotel (Salida, Colorado), which I see you just accepted, thanks!). cheers, --Doncram (talk) 02:20, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Doncram, I want to thank you for taking that advice to heart and making more of an effort for three sources. Happy to accept many of those drafts! Let me know when you've got other drafts and I'll either try to help or take a look at it in AfC. Bkissin (talk) 14:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manhattan Hotel (Salida, Colorado) has been accepted

Manhattan Hotel (Salida, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maxwell Park School has been accepted

Maxwell Park School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morley Bridge has been accepted

Morley Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Columbine (Clark, Colorado) has been accepted

Columbine (Clark, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:51, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fairplay Hotel has been accepted

Fairplay Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Como School has been accepted

Como School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarryall School has been accepted

Tarryall School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:07, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Estabrook Historic District has been accepted

Estabrook Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:46, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baca House and Outbuilding has been accepted

Baca House and Outbuilding, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:04, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salt Works Ranch has been accepted

Salt Works Ranch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:04, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sherman (Batesville, Indiana) has been accepted

The Sherman (Batesville, Indiana), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Old Trail School (Wiggins, Colorado) has been accepted

Old Trail School (Wiggins, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earl School has been accepted

Earl School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Federal buildings in Canada has been nominated for merging

Category:Federal buildings in Canada has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Peel (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Federal buildings in the United States has been nominated for merging

Category:Federal buildings in the United States has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:11, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Knearl School has been accepted

Knearl School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaffa Opera House has been accepted

Jaffa Opera House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

NRHP CP article

F.Y.I, Draft:F. H. Gillingham & Sons could use more work if you are interested. MB 14:36, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Korn (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anton Korn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anton Korn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Latuda House has been accepted

Frank Latuda House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:36, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: San Angelo National Bank Building has been accepted

San Angelo National Bank Building, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jared L. Brush Barn has been accepted

Jared L. Brush Barn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Luciapop (talk) 06:43, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: J. B. Blakeney House has been accepted

J. B. Blakeney House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Luciapop (talk) 07:00, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bridge over Burro Cañon has been accepted

Bridge over Burro Cañon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Belleview Inn

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Belleview Inn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Valid article. Modified slightly just now to put off the bot. Same done also for following items. --Doncram (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kings Courtyard Inn

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hotel on Phillips

Just now changed to a redirect to Hotel on Phillips mainspace article, created previously by moving an existing article. --Doncram (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hotel Viking (Newport, Rhode Island)

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kendall Hotel

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Greystone Hotel

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jefferson Clinton Hotel

Developing just now. Found National Archives copy of historic district NRHP document with detail about the hotel, under name "Dome Hotel". --Doncram (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Napa River Inn

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Partridge Inn

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Norwich Inn

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:National Hotel (Miami Beach, Florida)

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Newport Beach Hotel & Suites

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Royal Palms Resort and Spa

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Terrace Hotel (Lakeland, Florida)

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Cotton Sail Hotel

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Silver Birches (hotel)

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tubac Golf Resort and Spa

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 01:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Wigwam (Litchfield Park, Arizona)

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 01:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Dewberry

Valid article. Modified slightly to put off bot. --Doncram (talk) 01:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kendall Hotel (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kendall Hotel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kendall Hotel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:46, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

"Olympic Park Stadium" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Olympic Park Stadium. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 28#Olympic Park Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. SportingFlyer T·C 21:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hilton Orrington has been accepted

Hilton Orrington, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Queensbury Hotel has been accepted

The Queensbury Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jefferson Clinton Hotel has been accepted

Jefferson Clinton Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 00:36, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fort Morgan City Hall has been accepted

Fort Morgan City Hall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:24, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corazon de Trinidad has been accepted

Corazon de Trinidad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Castle Rock Depot has been accepted

Castle Rock Depot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Colorado Zoom meeting 05/12/2021

WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold a Zoom meeting at 7:30 PM MDT on Wednesday, May 12, 2021, for those interested in working on Colorado Wikipedia articles. Your suggestions and comments are appreciated. Information about some of the things we need to do is located at Colorado things to do and Requested Colorado articles.

Topic: WikiProject Colorado May 2021
Time: May 12, 2021 07:30 PM MDT

Join Zoom Meeting https://us04web.zoom.us/j/78055623422?pwd=VUtPQVZrZzU1ZWVhZ0F1MExIeUQ2UT09

Meeting ID: 780 5562 3422
Passcode: WP:CO MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roald Amundsen's Home (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roald Amundsen's Home and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Roald Amundsen's Home, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 19:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Bkissin, for what it's worth, you were really wrong on this one. It was where he outfitted his ship for the expedition to the south pole. A few favorite sled-pulling dogs which weren't eaten, got to live out their retirement here. It is simply charming. It is preserved as he left it on his last trip, a rescue operation from which he did not return. I pretty much had that in the draft, which i requested for undeletion, but have not gotten back yet. Further I knew it was very significant, and should be on Norway's heritage registry, and i think i said that, but I couldn't find it.

Turns out the Wikipedia list-article for its town, omitted it accidentally, i was just advised. And I added it to the NO list-article. But before finding this and its extensive-enough listing documentation, I already rounded up more coverage, by, now, searching and reading articles in Norwegian, which i wasn't doing before. I wasn't up to speed on how to get Google translate to help.

Nyah, or harumph, or something. --Doncram (talk) 01:23, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Saint Paul Hotel (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Saint Paul Hotel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Saint Paul Hotel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 16:11, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

The article has been extensively developed by User:MB (thanks!), i think prompted by their seeing this AFC decline notice, and it has been promoted to mainspace. Paul W, I don't mind, but I do believe the article was valid even at time you declined it. I had not submitted it myself, I would have developed it more probably, but it was submitted by another editor. However it would surely have survived an AFD, if it were in mainspace, anyhow, as in an AFD discussion others would easily see the importance of the topic and could verify that numerous sources are available (as proven by further development). Perhaps AFC standards are different than AFD, though. Thanks anyhow for your volunteer AFC participation in general and for your evaluating this one. --Doncram (talk) 00:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniels School has been accepted

Daniels School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Weld County Courthouse has been accepted

Weld County Courthouse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:08, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of Hindu temples in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram1751 (talk • contribs) 23:53, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Deleted template

I've nowiki'd a transclusion of a deleted template from one of your userspace pages, just thought you might want to know. jp×g 17:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Mark's, Isle of Man has been accepted

St. Mark's, Isle of Man, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marksville Commercial Historic District has been accepted

Marksville Commercial Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarto Bridge has been accepted

Sarto Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brinker Collegiate Institute has been accepted

Brinker Collegiate Institute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 08:29, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help copy edit. Thanks you. Vnosm (talk) 05:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi in 2015

Well, I am flattered. Less when I see about 40 other editors were similarly invited. Vnosm had just been advised to seek copyediting help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors, but I don't see where I am listed there. Hmm, 山口茜, born (1997-06-06) 6 June 1997, article is long but interesting, though short on references. Seems written by someone who knows her. Maybe I can help, not sure. Wonder why the push now? There is coverage in several languages; the French wikipedia version explains her significance: "En 2013, elle remporte également l'Open du Japon devenant la plus jeune joueuse à gagner un titre Super Series à l'âge de 16 ans, 3 mois et 14 jours." --Doncram (talk) 05:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Partridge Inn has been accepted

Partridge Inn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 07:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Admiral Hotel (Mobile, Alabama) has been accepted

Admiral Hotel (Mobile, Alabama), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anderson Barn (Johnstown, Colorado) has been accepted

Anderson Barn (Johnstown, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Deleting pages you've created

For future reference if you are the author and only substantial contributor to a page, you may facilitate the deletion process by placing {{db-author}} on the page see CSD WP:G7, these tend to process more easily than unspecified db's. In addition pages obviously created in error, by you or anyone else may be tagged with {{db-error}} see CSD WP:G6. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 02:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Campbell House (Lexington, Kentucky)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Campbell House (Lexington, Kentucky), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Valid article. Modified slightly just now to put off the bot. Same done also for following items, all Historic Hotels of America. --Doncram (talk) 02:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buckeye School has been accepted

Buckeye School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GirthSummit _(blether) 07:53, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arrowhead Lodge has been accepted

Arrowhead Lodge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 07:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avery House (Fort Collins, Colorado) has been accepted

Avery House (Fort Collins, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GirthSummit _(blether) 08:24, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rialto Theater (Loveland, Colorado) has been accepted

Rialto Theater (Loveland, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 18:05, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Downtown Loveland Historic District has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Downtown Loveland Historic District. Thanks! _signed, Iflaq ^(talk) 14:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Downtown Loveland Historic District has been accepted

Downtown Loveland Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amos H. Root Building has been accepted

Amos H. Root Building, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DanCherek (talk) 04:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Highland Park Historic District (Denver, Colorado)

I know this area as I had a friend who used to live there. Ping me when it's ready and I will push it to mainspace, it is definitely notable. --- Possibly (talk) 07:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dickinson Branch Library has been accepted

Dickinson Branch Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 12:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Botanical and Horticultural Laboratory has been accepted

Botanical and Horticultural Laboratory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Building at 1389 Stuart Street has been accepted

Building at 1389 Stuart Street, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Saint Paul Hotel

On 4 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Saint Paul Hotel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when The Saint Paul Hotel was built in 1908–1910, a rathskeller was carved into the sandstone beneath the building? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Saint Paul Hotel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Saint Paul Hotel), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Butler House (Pueblo, Colorado) has been accepted

Butler House (Pueblo, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Yeeno (talk) 🍁 23:39, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Schools at War

On 6 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Schools at War, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the American Schools at War program (promotional poster pictured) raised over $2 billion (over $28 trillion today) to help pay for World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Schools at War. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Schools at War), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Charles Bridge (Pueblo, Colorado) has been accepted

St. Charles Bridge (Pueblo, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:28, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black River Bridge (Carrizo, Arizona) has been accepted

Black River Bridge (Carrizo, Arizona), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:56, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Church/restaurant building

Hey, can you look into something. List of Anglican churches has a redlink to a supposed NRHP listed church in Colorado Springs, 217 E. Pikes Peak Ave. It does seem to have an interesting history - was the Grace Episcopal Church from 1880 to c. 1929, then became the first location of the Village Inn chain.[11]. In 2011, it was back to a church, St. George's Anglican. Maybe this should have an article. But I see no evidence it is NRHP. Looks like a mistake in List of Anglican churches. MB 06:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

User:MB, it is in fact an Anglican church: https://www.stgac.org/. What it says in its history page is consistent with what you say above; it took the building in 2009 and it was a former Grace Episcopal then a restaurant/nightclub, etc. It was added in this edit in 2016, in the one surviving edit of its contributor. Who apparently copied the row from another having "NRHP-listed", and included an external link to the www.stgac.org URL. I agree it is not NRHP-listed; it is not in the NRHP infobox generator tool. I found the edit by WikiBlame tool searching on "217 E. Pikes Peak Ave". Yes, it sounds interesting for an article from what you say. --Doncram (talk) 07:18, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

I see you did some cleanup on that article. I see four more redlinks that also say NRHP-listed. These could be similary copy/paste errors. Or if they really are NRHP, we should be able to add address/coords. Just wondering if you were planning to look at those also? MB 16:50, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Walter House has been accepted

Martin Walter House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 11:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Detwiler House has been accepted

Detwiler House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 00:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dickens Opera House has been accepted

Dickens Opera House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crawford General Store (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tol was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crawford General Store and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crawford General Store, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol | talk | contribs 04:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crawford General Store has been accepted

Crawford General Store, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tol | talk | contribs 04:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Just so that you know, direct quotations are one of the statements requiring inline citations. While most of the article being quotations is fine, I generally prefer less than one third of the prose to be quotations. It doesn't impact the article (especially in this situation), though. Looking above on this talk page, you've submitted a lot of good work through AfC — I suggest that you just create articles yourself. Thanks for the article! Tol | talk | contribs 04:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes, Tol, pretty much of course direct quotations should have inline citations, as a matter of explicitly crediting wording to a given source (which, if not done, is one kind of plagiarism). I haven't heard of a one-third rule before, though it sounds like a decent general guideline, though I would be hard put to justify it specifically. Here, i dunno, i thought the quotes were fairly well-written and that I wouldn't improve upon them much by trying to put them into my own words. But that could be done, and I may revisit this article myself. I happen to be under an editing restriction so am using AFC for most new articles besides disambiguation pages, though. Thanks! --Doncram (talk) 05:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

You are welcome! I agree that the quotes were well-written, and especially in this article, they don't produce any negative impact — it's just that so much of the article is quoted text. I was unaware of the editing restriction; my apologies. Tol | talk | contribs 05:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Np, Tol. New Rossville Historic District (Rossville, Tennessee), by the way, has no quotes, and you accepted it while I was still figuring out that some photos at Commons were of buildings in the district, so now it is improved a bit further than you saw already. Pretty good quick article, I think. :) Thanks. --Doncram (talk) 06:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rossville Historic District (Rossville, Tennessee) has been accepted

Rossville Historic District (Rossville, Tennessee), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tol | talk | contribs 05:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Little Thompson River Bridge has been accepted

Little Thompson River Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Colorado and Southern Railway Depot has been accepted

Colorado and Southern Railway Depot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:55, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Ping has been accepted

Grace Ping, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Doric Loon (talk) 09:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boone Santa Fe Railroad Depot has been accepted

Boone Santa Fe Railroad Depot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:58, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Doncram:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1200 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathaniel W. Duke House has been accepted

Nathaniel W. Duke House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 08:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rialto Building

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rialto Building requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dan arndt (talk) 06:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Benjamin Bosworth Smith (architect)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benjamin Bosworth Smith (architect), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Colorado Summer Zoom Meeting

WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold a brief online meeting at 7:30 PM MDT on Tuesday, August 10, 2021. See what your fellow users have been up to and share your interests and suggestions. Some requests are listed at Colorado things to do and Requested Colorado articles.

Topic: WikiProject Colorado Summer Zoom Meeting
Time: August 10, 2021 07:30 PM MDT

Join Zoom Meeting https://us04web.zoom.us/j/74506020308?pwd=eTFPSlkzOUg0bTE2SVdXUnl2SVY4Zz09

Meeting ID: 745 0602 0308
Passcode: Colorado

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hotel Lombardy

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hotel Lombardy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Francis P. Smith (architect)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Francis P. Smith (architect), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:16, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:W.H. Over Museum

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:W.H. Over Museum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:19, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Moore House (Mandeville, Louisiana)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moore House (Mandeville, Louisiana), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Fannin-Cooper Farm

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fannin-Cooper Farm, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Williams Cemetery

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Williams Cemetery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Museum

Hello, I tried to improve the draft of this article mainly by adding more information and sources.-Seb { 💬 Talk + 📝 Edits } 07:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Seb, thanks for doing that! To me, the topic of the W.H. Over Museum was clearly Wikipedia-notable, but I guess i probably wanted to develop it a bit more before submitting to AFC or otherwise putting it into mainspace. Also maybe i went back to other edits/topics on South Dakota archeology and forgot about it. Glad you fixed it up more, and I have now submitted it. Tx, --Doncram (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

@Doncram: Apparently some references were not remarkable enough to be placed in the article, that do not comply with this rule, sorry, I will try to look for better reliable sources for this museum, for the moment I found different sources that are reliable, one is from South Dakota Magazine, the second one is from Sioux City Journal and the third one is from the University of South Dakota. I will try to improve the article and correct the mistakes it has, I will also try to find more information about this museum. For the moment, I just finished looking for information about a museum in Tunisia, which has just been accepted.-Seb { 💬 Talk + 📝 Edits } 01:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fannin-Cooper Farm has been accepted

Fannin-Cooper Farm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:11, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vickers House has been accepted

Vickers House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:11, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: W.H. Over Museum has been accepted

W.H. Over Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:18, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Nyeri Museum

Hi, Doncram, I have several questions regarding the structure of the Nyeri Museum Article, first I should add the name of museum in Swahili? second, could you check the spelling of the article, English is not my native language (I am from Latin America) and my writing in this language is sometimes not very good, third, the article could be considered as stub or start-class? -Seb { 💬 Talk + 📝 Edits } 13:15, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

@Doncram: I have also been working on the Meru Museum article, I was adding information, I don't know if it can still be considered as a stub...if you could review these Kenyan museum articles I would appreciate it very much.-Seb { 💬 Talk + 📝 Edits } 15:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Wongamat Tower

I replied to your comments over at that AfD. You could AGF a little more, there was nothing wrong with my edits as the deleting nominator in the least. I was mildly disheartened to hear so many baseless criticisms, to be honest. --- Possibly ☎ 02:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Draft:Gillespie-Selden Historic District

Hello Doncram. Since it's your belief that the text at https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/GetAsset/NRHP/97000336_text is not public domain, it's not appropriate to paste it into your draft. I see your edit summary says "quote", but there were no quotation marks or block quote template.— Diannaa (talk) 13:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Umm, User:Diannaa I think it is effing excessive of you to revdel on that draft. I knew where the quote started and stopped and if it wasn't clear to you, u could have added quote marks or asked me to. It is a Draft, in Draftspace. And, you are not familiar with these types of documents, but they are "nearly" public domain: the writers and everyone involved thought they were being put into the public domain, but they technically were not. There has never in the history of NRHP program ever been a case where a writer/copyright-owner of one of these documents wanted to assert ownership. You don't know what you're doing, IMHO, and it is a tad offensive for you to be revdelling me, a very experienced editor. Whatever. I don't care about this, but I hope you are not like some other editors over the many years I have been contributing in wikipedia who gets all excessive and righteous and engaging in what humans call harassment over long periods of time (about other kinds of "issues"). One misunderstanding or whatever this should be called does not constitute harassment at all, I am not saying that; it is just one minorly unpleasant incident. Cheers, --Doncram (talk) 00:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Note the copyright policy applies to all parts of Wikipedia, including drafts, sandboxes, and talk pages. We don't base copyright cleanup decisions on the likelihood of getting caught, but on Wikipedia policy. It's too long a quote to leave in a finished article, so it would have to be removed eventually regardless. If you need the material for work on the draft I suggest you copy it to a Word document or to Google docs. — Diannaa (talk) 02:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Z Street (organization)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Z Street (organization), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Pointe Coupee Banner

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Pointe Coupee Banner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:River Street Inn

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:River Street Inn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

2020 United States Census for Colorado

WikiProject Colorado

I've posted the results of the 2020 United States Census for Colorado at Wikipedia:WikiProject Colorado/2020 Census. You may wish to update your existing Colorado articles with this data.

Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 04:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Colorado at 11:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brannen-Devine House has been accepted

Brannen-Devine House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:52, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acadia Ranch has been accepted

Acadia Ranch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Downtown Boulder Historic District has been accepted

Downtown Boulder Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Dewberry has been accepted

The Dewberry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Olathe sweet corn

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olathe sweet corn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Bungalow photos

I'd be happy to take some images of the Bungalow Colony Historic District. I am not sure when I will be able to get to San Antonio, but I suspect it will be in the next few weeks. Regards Nv8200pa talk 09:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ginacci House has been accepted

Ginacci House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Could you give my new NRHP article a look?

Campbell Chapel African Methodist Episcopal Church (Bluffton, South Carolina). I haven't properly formatted the nomination correctly because I'm not seeing which template to use, especially since this April 2019 approval doesn't seem to be online just yet. Is there something obvious I'm missing? If you ever need to request an AFC review from me, feel invited to ask. BusterD (talk) 19:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Bungalow photos

I fell short of getting all the surviving buildings, but here are a few. Category:Bungalow Colony Historic District Regards, Nv8200pa talk 19:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Peter D. Easton moved to draftspace

An article created 06:16, 21 August 2010‎, Peter D. Easton, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of bank buildings (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of bank buildings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of bank buildings, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

• I'd suggest that maybe you start with a list of just major bank headquarters rather than unrealistically believing you are going to create a list of all the notable bank buildings in the world. Dan arndt (talk) 01:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia's notability guidelines apply equally to the creation of lists. Whether a list is notable or not is based on its notability as a group. It is generally accepted that a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Dan arndt (talk) 14:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Anton Korn

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anton Korn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:List of bank buildings has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of bank buildings. Thanks! – robertsky (talk) 10:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Railroad and Bank Building

I vaguely remember you left a comment somewhere about this article (when it was a stub within Lowertown Historic District (Saint Paul, Minnesota). I just turned it into a real article. I think this is one of those places you were helping me identify as it has had so many names over the years. MB 23:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

User:MB, yes, that sorting out was at Talk:The Saint Paul Hotel; it had been a redlink from Historic Hotels of America's The Saint Paul Hotel which you developed for DYK. Wow, this one is now quite a nice article. By the way about bank buildings, am developing Draft:List of bank buildings and encountering basic opposition about list-articles which is off-putting; it would be great if you saw fit to move it to mainspace. Bank buildings is a very substantial topic, so far neglected while much lesser things have world-wide list-articles. --Doncram (talk) 07:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't feel comfortable with this one. I'm not a big fan of list articles. MB 14:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wagon Wheel Gap Hot Springs Resort has been accepted

Wagon Wheel Gap Hot Springs Resort, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huerfano Bridge has been accepted

Huerfano Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:49, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Salt Museum (Liverpool, New York)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Salt Museum (Liverpool, New York), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Galligan House has been accepted

Galligan House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bull Pasture

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bull Pasture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Erskine P. Caldwell House

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Erskine P. Caldwell House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:De Luxe Florida

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:De Luxe Florida, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:23, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Alpine Pass

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alpine Pass, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Alfred H. Bordelon House

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alfred H. Bordelon House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Willis Adams Marean

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Willis Adams Marean, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Country Club Historic District (Denver, Colorado)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Country Club Historic District (Denver, Colorado), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:American Federation of Human Rights Headquarters

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:American Federation of Human Rights Headquarters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lincoln School (Erie, Colorado)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lincoln School (Erie, Colorado), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Three-part commercial

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Three-part commercial, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Land Utilization Program Headquarters

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Land Utilization Program Headquarters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Luis Muñoz Rivera School

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luis Muñoz Rivera School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:McCormick House (Trinidad, Colorado)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:McCormick House (Trinidad, Colorado), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boulder Creek Bridge (Boulder, Colorado) has been accepted

Boulder Creek Bridge (Boulder, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 10:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Longmont Carnegie Library has been accepted

Longmont Carnegie Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 10:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lincoln School (Erie, Colorado) has been accepted

Lincoln School (Erie, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:36, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for creating Boulder Creek Bridge (Boulder, Colorado). - Hatchens (talk) 15:09, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robinson House (Louisville, Colorado) has been accepted

Robinson House (Louisville, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bullion Plaza School has been accepted

Bullion Plaza School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	You're really something! Thanks! (BTW, I'm not ignoring you - am crazy busy this week). The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! This relates to Talk:List of lists of buildings and structures in Puerto Rico, where i'm occasionally plugging on more, e.g. calling for development on canneries in PR now, and where The Eloquent Peasant has taken inspiration to develop more, e.g. Cathedral of Rum.--Doncram (talk) 01:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: D.M. Francis House has been accepted

D.M. Francis House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boulder Post Office has been accepted

Boulder Post Office, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Ping me on your submissions

Hey Doncram! Feel free to ping me on your submissions and I'll take a look. You're usually good to accept. Bkissin (talk) 16:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dead Indian Canyon Bridge has been accepted

Dead Indian Canyon Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Women's clubs in Colorado

A tag has been placed on Category:Women's clubs in Colorado indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Michael Stenmark

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Stenmark, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Roald Amundsen's Home

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roald Amundsen's Home, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James R. Welker House has been accepted

James R. Welker House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:30, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bunce School has been accepted

Bunce School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:R.T. Frazier House

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:R.T. Frazier House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Belleview Inn

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Belleview Inn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Greystone Hotel

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Greystone Hotel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Norwich Inn

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Norwich Inn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:National Hotel (Miami Beach, Florida)

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "National Hotel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Newport Beach Hotel & Suites

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Newport Beach Hotel & Suites".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Royal Palms Resort and Spa

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Royal Palms Resort and Spa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Terrace Hotel (Lakeland, Florida)

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Terrace Hotel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tubac Golf Resort and Spa

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tubac Golf Resort and Spa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kings Courtyard Inn

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kings Courtyard Inn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhoades House has been accepted

Rhoades House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Bkissin, thanks. This other draft is good i think. I didn't want to change too much. Maybe you and/or i could develop more later, and provide further feedback later. --Doncram (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hoverhome and Hover Farmstead has been accepted

Hoverhome and Hover Farmstead, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Deb (talk) 12:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Historic registry ones

Thank you so much for your valuable links and guidance, I will try to follow all of that. Also, thank you for all the pictures you added.--Alfred Hanna (talk) 07:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome. This is about advice i offered about Draft:List of Eastern Orthodox churches in Australia, after finding my way there from browsing User:Deb's recent contributions, after Deb accepted an AFC submission of mine. Let's continue at Draft talk:List of Eastern Orthodox churches in Australia. --Doncram (talk) 14:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Salida Livestock Commission Company

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Salida Livestock Commission Company, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hugh M.G. Garden

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hugh M.G. Garden, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carrizo Bridges (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FormalDude was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carrizo Bridges and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Carrizo Bridges, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––FormalDude talk 07:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hotel Brexton

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hotel Brexton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ward School

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ward School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Church of Christ, Scientist, churches

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Church of Christ, Scientist, churches, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:J. Walter Stevens

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:J. Walter Stevens, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Brown Street Clock Company

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brown Street Clock Company, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel Viking (Newport, Rhode Island) has been accepted

Hotel Viking (Newport, Rhode Island), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Brief online meeting of WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject Colorado

What's up with Wikipedia and WikiProjectColorado? Join us for a brief online meeting at 7:30 PM MDT Tuesday evening, November 9, 2021 at https://meet.google.com/wyz-dfek-fdp

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

User:Buaidh must have organized this.

I stated elsewhere: I assume you are behind it, making it happen, thank you for doing that! By the way, there was a goal I believe i expressed to you and/or to the first meeting this year, which was to bring every Colorado county up to 50 percent coverage, in terms of there being articles, of National Register of Historic Places-listed places. I was originally hoping to get help working towards that, but have plugged along mostly by myself, no problem. And, by the way, the goal has pretty much been met: see this current map graphic of NRHP article percentage by county, U.S.-wide, and note that Colorado is now in the red shades, has no counties in the blue shades. (Well, at least if you don't zoom in on Denver.) Whereas, say, this version as of March 2020 had a bunch of blue counties. The big tabulation of all counties' stats in Colorado and everywhere else is at wp:NRHPPROGRESS. I feel this recent accomplishment was a result of the WikiProject Colorado meetings, which motivated me to work along on this! Cheers, --Doncram (talk) 02:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Granite Building (Denver) has been accepted

Granite Building (Denver), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jyoti Roy (talk) 11:16, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Marietta City Cemetery

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marietta City Cemetery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clark House (Prescott, Arizona) has been accepted

Clark House (Prescott, Arizona), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Florian Krammer

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Florian Krammer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:St. Charles River Bridge (Devine, Colorado)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:St. Charles River Bridge (Devine, Colorado), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brinkmeyer House (Prescott, Arizona) has been accepted

Brinkmeyer House (Prescott, Arizona), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Do you have a link for the Walking Prescott article? Bkissin (talk) 19:58, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Building at 400 East Third Street has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Building at 400 East Third Street. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 18:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Building at 400 East Third Street has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Building at 400 East Third Street. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harvey-Niemeyer House has been accepted

Harvey-Niemeyer House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hotel La Rose

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hotel La Rose".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:La Valencia Hotel

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "La Valencia Hotel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Stonepine Estate

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stonepine Estate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:53, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

"Thompson, Sanford, & Ginnochio" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Thompson, Sanford, & Ginnochio. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 30#Thompson, Sanford, & Ginnochio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 18:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:A-frame houses and buildings has been nominated for discussion

Category:A-frame houses and buildings has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Axos Financial page edits

I disclosed a conflict of interest and shared some proposed edits to the Axos Financial page a month ago. Editors addressed the overt BLP issues, but essentially said the page was too boring to look at the rest. I saw that you were a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Business/Accounting task force and thought the page may be less boring to you if you have an interest in finance/business. I was wondering if you would be willing to take a look at the proposed changes and implement whichever one(s) you feel would improve Wikipedia? Gfrostaxos (talk) 20:21, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of bank buildings (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Goldsztajn was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of bank buildings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of bank buildings, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Goldsztajn (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, December 2021

Bots Newsletter, December 2021

BRFA activity by month

Welcome to the eighth issue of the English Wikipedia's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Maintainers disappeared to parts unknown... bots awakening from the slumber of æons... hundreds of thousands of short descriptions... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Wikipedia's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

Our last issue was in August 2019, so there's quite a bit of catching up to do. Due to the vast quantity of things that have happened, the next few issues will only cover a few months at a time. This month, we'll go from September 2019 through the end of the year. I won't bore you with further introductions — instead, I'll bore you with a newsletter about bots.

Overall

• Between September and December 2019, there were 33 BRFAs. Of these, Y 25 were approved, and 8 were unsuccessful (N2 3 denied, ? 3 withdrawn, and 2 expired).

September 2019

Look! It's moving. It's alive. It's alive... It's alive, it's moving, it's alive, it's alive, it's alive, it's alive, IT'S ALIVE!

• Y Monkbot 16, DannyS712 bot 60, Ahechtbot 6, PearBOT 3, Qbugbot 3 · N2 DannyS712 bot 5, PkbwcgsBot 24 · ? DannyS712 bot 61, TheSandBot 4
• TParis goes away, UTRSBot goes kaput: Beeblebrox noted that the bot for maintaining on-wiki records of UTRS appeals stopped working a while ago. TParis, the semi-retired user who had previously run it, said they were "unlikely to return to actively editing Wikipedia", and the bot had been vanquished by trolls submitting bogus UTRS requests on behalf of real blocked users. While OAuth was a potential fix, neither maintainer had time to implement it. TParis offered to access to the UTRS WMFLabs account to any admin identified with the WMF: "I miss you guys a whole lot [...] but I've also moved on with my life. Good luck, let me know how I can help". Ultimately, SQL ended up in charge. Some progress was made, and the bot continued to work another couple months — but as of press time, UTRSBot has not edited since November 2019.
• Article-measuring contest resumed: The list of Wikipedians by article count, which had lain dead for several years, was triumphantly resurrected by GreenC following a bot request.

October 2019

• Y OAbot 3, DannyS712 bot 47, Pathbot 2, PearBOT 2, DannyS712 bot 59, DannyS712 bot 62, HasteurBot 14, PearBOT 4, WOSlinkerBot 4, MilHistBot 5
• Curb Safe Charmer adopts reFill: TAnthony pointed out that reFill 2's bug reports were going unanswered; creator Zhaofeng Li had retired from Wikipedia, and a maintainer was needed. As of June 2021, Curb Safe Charmer had taken up the mantle, saying: "Not that I have all the skills needed but better me than nobody! 'Maintainer' might be too strong a term though. Volunteers welcome!"
  

November 2019

Now you're thinking with portals.

• Y BHGbot 4, YiFeiBot 2, DannyS712 bot III 64 · ? PearBOT
• Old bots do new tricks: DannyS712 bot III 64 prowled redirects, YiFeiBot 2 archived GoCE requests, and BHGbot 4 removed links to portals deleted at MfD (until its authorization was revoked in January at operator BrownHairedGirl's request).

December 2019

• Y DemonDays64 Bot, DannyS712 bot III 66, Bot1058 6, Monkbot 15, MilHistBot 6, PearBOT 5, DannyS712 bot IV 65 · N2 SportsStatsBot · Xinbenlv bot, SteveBot 8
• Redirects to be autopatrolled: A RfC took place at WP:NPP, closing with unanimous consensus that new redirects should be automatically marked as patrolled by bot. DannyS712 wasted no time, and submitted DannyS712 bot III 66 the next day; it passed two days after that.
• 200,000 bios get short descs: Along a similar vein, Bot1058 6 was approved to remove disambiguation pages from Category:Monitored short pages and a new bot (DemonDays64 Bot) changed lots of http links to https using JavaScript Wiki Browser. One particularly neat task, PearBOT 5, automatically generated short descriptions for more than 200,000 biographies.

In the next issue of Bots Newsletter:
What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?

• What happens when two bots want to clerk the same page?
• What happens when an adminbot goes hog wild?
• Will reFill ever get fixed?
• What's up with ListeriaBot, anyway?
• Python 3.4 deprecation? In my PyWikiBot? (It's more likely than you think!)

These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the January 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!

Signing off... jp×g 04:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

---

(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

A somewhat premature New Year's greeting

John Vanderlyn, Ariadne Asleep on the Island of Naxos (c.1812), Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts		Best wishes for a safe, healthy and prosperous 2022.
		Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 20:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC) Moral lesson: John Vanderlyn was an American painter who studied in Paris, and his life-sized Ariadne Asleep on the Island of Naxos was one of the first large nudes exhibited in the United States. Peddling the poison as well as the cure, this overtly sensuous work was presented to the public as a moral lesson on the consequences of lascivious behavior. Visible in the distance is the ship of Princess Ariadne's secret lover, Theseus, for whom she has betrayed her people by helping him to escape the Labyrinth and slay the Minotaur. Ariadne's bliss will come to an end when she awakens from her post-coital reverie, only to discover that the faithless Theseus has sailed away without her.

Happy New Year, Doncram!

Happy New Year!

Doncram,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 13:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Concern regarding Draft:Highland Park Historic District (Denver, Colorado)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Highland Park Historic District (Denver, Colorado), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Daniels Park

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniels Park, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Santa Fe Railway Water Tank

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Santa Fe Railway Water Tank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Wishing you a happy 2022!

• 
• 
• 

Happy New Year!

• 
  MMXXII Lunar Calendar

Doncram,
Have a great 2022 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

---

   – Background color is Very Peri (#6868ab), Pantone's 2022 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2022}} to user talk pages.

– North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:California Cracker Company

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "California Cracker Company".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Highland Park Historic District (Denver, Colorado) has been accepted

Highland Park Historic District (Denver, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:08, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Santa Fe Railway Water Tank has been accepted

Santa Fe Railway Water Tank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniels Park has been accepted

Daniels Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Leon Gleckman

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leon Gleckman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Needlework Guild of America

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Needlework Guild of America, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lavalizard101 (talk) 21:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leon Gleckman has been accepted

Leon Gleckman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marsh Hall

The article Marsh Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one notable topic by this name, so no need for a disambiguation page here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Congregational Church (Osawatomie, Kansas) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Congregational Church (Osawatomie, Kansas). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Congregational Church (Osawatomie, Kansas) has been accepted

Congregational Church (Osawatomie, Kansas), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big John Farm Limestone Bank Barn has been accepted

Big John Farm Limestone Bank Barn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:15, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stonepine Estate has been accepted

Stonepine Estate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winona Consolidated School has been accepted

Winona Consolidated School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Edgewater (Madison, Wisconsin)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Edgewater (Madison, Wisconsin), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Edgewater (Madison, Wisconsin) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Edgewater (Madison, Wisconsin). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federal Building and U.S. Post Office (Fargo, North Dakota) has been accepted

Federal Building and U.S. Post Office (Fargo, North Dakota), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Edgewater (Madison, Wisconsin) has been accepted

The Edgewater (Madison, Wisconsin), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Cats on drafts

What do you think you were doing here?. You should know better. Fram (talk) 08:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:City and town halls in Kansas

A tag has been placed on Category:City and town halls in Kansas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lone Star School, District 64 has been accepted

Lone Star School, District 64, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norton Downtown Historic District has been accepted

Norton Downtown Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: La Valencia Hotel has been accepted

La Valencia Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgetown Inn has been accepted

Georgetown Inn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for St. George's Episcopal Memorial Church

On 22 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article St. George's Episcopal Memorial Church, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the windows of St. George's Episcopal Memorial Church in Bismarck, North Dakota, contain stained glass fragments collected from English churches damaged during World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St. George's Episcopal Memorial Church. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, St. George's Episcopal Memorial Church), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Building at 400 East Third Street

Happened upon this draft. Casa Grande's newspaper is scanned and available, full-run, through an Advantage Preservation portal. I turned up not only that the church was a Church of Christ but that it was completed in 1943, not 1950 as the nomination lists. It looks like the current church (which has gone through some name changes) has been a tenant since shortly after the Church of Christ built a new building. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:47, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hoff School District No. 42 has been accepted

Hoff School District No. 42, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Cotton Sail Hotel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Cotton Sail Hotel. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 17:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:La Grande Princesse School

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:La Grande Princesse School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Temple Emanuel (Pueblo, Colorado)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Temple Emanuel (Pueblo, Colorado), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Emil Frei and Associates

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Emil Frei and Associates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:EM Ranch

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EM Ranch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jefferson High School (Jefferson, Wisconsin)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jefferson High School (Jefferson, Wisconsin), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hay hood

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hay hood, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Highland Park (Denver, Colorado)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Highland Park (Denver, Colorado), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:First Baptist Church of Boulder

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Baptist Church of Boulder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:South Main and South Elm Streets Historic District

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:South Main and South Elm Streets Historic District, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Gillespie-Selden Historic District

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gillespie-Selden Historic District, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lawrence Monberg

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lawrence Monberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

• Special report: WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment

• News and notes: Feedback for Board of Trustees election

• Interview: CEO Maryana Iskander "four weeks in"

• Black History Month: What are you doing for Black History Month?

• Deletion report: Ringing in the new year: Subject notability guideline under discussion

• WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured

• Arbitration report: New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2021

• Gallery: No Spanish municipality without a photograph

• Obituary: Twofingered Typist

• Op-Ed: Identifying and rooting out climate change denial

• Essay: The prime directive

• Opinion: Should the Wikimedia Foundation continue to accept cryptocurrency donations?

• In the media: Fuzzy-headed government editing

• Recent research: Articles with higher quality ratings have fewer "knowledge gaps"

• Serendipity: Pooh entered the Public Domain – but Tigger has to wait two more years

• Crossword: Cross swords with a crossword

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perry Hodgden House has been accepted

Perry Hodgden House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, January 2022

Bots Newsletter, January 2022

BRFA activity by month

Welcome to the ninth issue of the English Wikipedia's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Vicious bot-on-bot edit warring... superseded tasks... policy proposals... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Wikipedia's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

After a long hiatus between August 2019 and December 2021, there's quite a bit of ground to cover. Due to the vastness, I decided in December to split the coverage up into a few installments that covered six months each. Some people thought this was a good idea, since covering an entire year in a single issue would make it unmanageably large. Others thought this was stupid, since they were getting talk page messages about crap from almost three years ago. Ultimately, the question of whether each issue covers six months or a year is only relevant for a couple more of them, and then the problem will be behind us forever.

Of course, you can also look on the bright side – we are making progress, and this issue will only be about crap from almost two years ago. Today we will pick up where we left off in December, and go through the first half of 2020.

Overall
In the first half of 2020, there were 71 BRFAs. Of these, Y 59 were approved, and 12 were unsuccessful (with N2 8 denied, ? 2 withdrawn, and 2 expired).

January 2020

Yeah, you're not gonna be able to get away with this anymore.

• Y ST47Bot, Seppi333Bot, Qbugbot 4 · N2 PkbwcgsBot 25, PkbwcgsBot 26
• A new Pywikibot release dropped support for Python 3.4, and it was expected that support for Python 2.7 would be removed in coming updates. Toolforge itself planned to drop Python 2 support in 2022.
• Two new bots dropped in January 2020: ST47Bot, the successor to STBot, and Seppi333Bot, whose task was to perform a weekly update of four "massive" wikitables for WikiProject Molecular Biology.
• Cydebot, an adminbot operated by Cyde since 2006, was blocked after going berserk on categories that hadn't yet been CfD'd.

February 2020

Speaking of WikiProject Molecular Biology, Listeria went wild in February

• Y AnomieBOT 78, Cewbot 2, DannyS712 bot 67, DannyS712 bot III 63, PearBOT 6, DemonDays64 Bot 2 · N2 PearBOT
• On February 1, some concerns were raised about ListeriaBot performing "nonsense" edits. Semi-active operator Magnus Manske (who originally coded the Phase II software|precursor of MediaWiki) was pinged. Meanwhile, the bot was temporarily blocked for several hours until the issue was diagnosed and resolved.
• On February 18, ST47Bot got into a tussle with Amalthea (bot), and had to be partially-blocked from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cases/Overview.

March 2020

• Y MajavahBot, SDZeroBot, TheSandBot 6, TheSandBot 7, Bitbotje, FACBot 6, TheSandBot 8, Qbugbot 5, Cewbot 3, SDZeroBot 2, PrimeBOT 31, WikiCleanerBot 12 · AntiCompositeBot
• In March, a long discussion was started at Wikipedia talk:Bot policy by Skdb about the troubling trend of bots "expiring" without explanation after their owners became inactive. This can happen for a variety of reasons -- API changes break code, hosting providers' software updates break code, hosting accounts lapse, software changes make bots' edits unnecessary, and policy changes make bots' edits unwanted. The most promising solution seemed to be Toolforge hosting (although it has some problems of its own, like the occasional necessity of refactoring code).
• Some of the twelve bot tasks approved this month were TheSandBot 6 (removing blocked users from Category:Wikipedia usernames with possible policy issues), and TheSandBot 7 (removing unblocked users from Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for promotional user names). SDZeroBot 2 was approved to refine geographic stub tags. New bots approved this month were MajavahBot (to patrol WP:EFFPR), SDZeroBot (to merge stub tags), and Bitbotje (fixing DISPLAYTITLE modifications, DEFAULTSORT errors and broken behavior switches in draftspace).

April 2020

Listeria being examined

• Y TheSandBot 9, BHGbot 5, DannyS712 bot 69, SDZeroBot 3, ST47ProxyBot, WugBot 4, SDZeroBot 4, DatBot 10, WikiCleanerBot 11, WikiCleanerBot 13, WikiCleanerBot 14, AntiCompositeBot 2, Cewbot 4 · N2 DaedanBot 1 · Creffbot
• A discussion on the bot noticeboard, "Re-examination of ListeriaBot", was started by Barkeep49, who pointed out repeated operation outside the scope of its BRFA (i.e. editing pages in mainspace, and adding non-free images to others). Some said it was doing good work, and others said it was operating beyond its remit. It was blocked on April 10; the next day it was unblocked, reblocked from article space, reblocked "for specified non-editing actions", unblocked, and indeffed. The next week, several safeguards were implemented in its code by Magnus; the bot was allowed to roam free once more on April 18.
• ST47ProxyBot joined the stable in April, after a BRFA started in December was finally completed. As an adminbot, it was authorized to block IP addresses belonging to open proxies, public VPN services, and web hosts. New tasks approved for existing bots included BHGbot 5 (diffusing categories), TheSandBot 9 (taking over some tasks from the inactive RonBot), and WugBot 4 (updating data at {{Interactive COVID-19 maps}}). Also, DatBot 10 was approved to scale down non-free SVGs — I didn't even know that was a thing.
• A discussion at Wikipedia talk:Bot policy was started by Thryduulf about whether WP:BOTCOMM should explicitly specify that bot operators must be responsive to concerns raised on English Wikipedia specifically (as opposed to Phabricator, SourceForge, Toolforge, et cetera). Eventually, the policy was amended to its current form:

Issues and enquiries are typically expected to be handled on the English Wikipedia. Pages reachable via unified login, like a talk page at Commons or at Italian Wikipedia could also be acceptable [...] External sites like Phabricator or GitHub (which require separate registration or do not allow for IP comments) and email (which can compromise anonymity) can supplement on-wiki communication, but do not replace it.

May 2020

We heard you like bots, so we made a bot that reports the status of your bots, so now you can use bots while you use bots

• Y MajavahBot 3, DannyS712 bot 70, CitationCleanerBot 5, Dreamy Jazz Bot 4, QEDKbot, William Avery Bot 2, DannyS712 bot 68, PrimeBOT 32, TheSandBot 10, Bot1058 7, BHGbot 6, EaglesBot 2, Cewbot 5, WikiCleanerBot 17 · N2 MDanielsBot, PhuzBot 3, Gedimon · ? PearBOT 7
• MajavahBot 3, an impressively meta bot task, was approved this month for maintaining a list of bots running on the English Wikipedia. The page, located at User:MajavahBot/Bot status report, is updated every 24 hours; it contains a list of all accounts with the bot flag, as well as their operator, edit count, last activity date, last edit date, last logged action date, user groups and block status.
• Other approvals for this month were William Avery Bot 2 (processing redirects in {{R from scientific name}}), DannyS712 bot 68 (allowing users to schedule bot reminders for themselves), TheSandBot 10 (removing blocked/locked users from Category:User talk pages with conflict of interest notices), Bot1058 7 (updating Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests/Permalink), Dreamy Jazz Bot 4 (adding {{WikiProject Biography|living=no}} to talk pages where their associated article is in a year of death category), and QEDKbot (deleting and nominating empty categories).
• General syntax fixing tasks were approved for DannyS712 bot 70, CitationCleanerBot 5, PrimeBOT 32, BHGbot 6, Cewbot 5, and EaglesBot 2, as well as WikiCleanerBot 15, 16, and 17.
• Seven bots who fell below activity requirements (with neither the bots nor their operators having any edits or logged actions in two years) had their bot flags removed. They were NekoBot, Robert SkyBot, DASHBotAV, VoxelBot, JackieBot, ReferenceBot, and CensusBot.
• On May 12, EmausBot was blocked.

June 2020

A partial block averted at the eleventh hour for the robot that makes Legos

• Y QEDKbot 2, AnomieBOT 79, WOSlinkerBot 6, Yapperbot 2, Yapperbot, AnomieBOT 80, Dreamy Jazz Bot 5, WikiCleanerBot 18, HasteurBot 15, MusikBot II 4, NoSandboxesHere · N2 RedWarn · ? Seppi333Bot 2
• In July 2017, Headbomb made a proposal that a section of the Wikipedia:Dashboard be devoted to bots and technical issues. In November 2019, Lua code was written superseding Legobot's tasks on that page, and operator Legoktm was asked to stop them so that the new code could be deployed. After no response to pings, a partial-block of Legobot for the dashboard was proposed. Some months later, on June 16, Headbomb said: "A full block serves nothing. A partial block solves all current issues [...] Just fucking do it. It's been 3 years now." The next day, however, Legoktm disabled the task, and the dashboard was successfully refactored.
• On June 7, RexxS blocked Citation bot for disruptive editing, saying it was "still removing links after request to stop". A couple weeks later, a discussion on the bots noticeboard was opened, saying "it is a widely-used and useful bot, but it has one of the longest block logs for any recently-operating bot on Wikipedia". While its last BRFA approval was in 2011, its code and functionality had changed dramatically since then, and AntiCompositeNumber requested that BAG require a new BRFA. Maintainer AManWithNoPlan responded that most blocks were from years ago (when it lacked a proper test suite), and problems since then had mostly been one-off errors (like a June 2019 incident in which a LTA had "weaponized" the bot to harass editors).
• David Tornheim opened a discussion about whether bots based on closed-source code should be permitted, and proposed that they not. He cited a recent case in which a maintainer had said "I can only suppose that the code that is available on GitHub is not the actual code that was running on [the bot]". Some disagreed: Naypta said that "I like free software as much as the next person, and I strongly believe that bot operators should make their bot code public, but I don't think it should be that they must do so".
• Two new bots had their first BRFAs approved: Yapperbot, to replace Legobot for handling the Feedback Request Service, and NoSandboxesHere, to remove {{user sandbox}} from articles in draftspace using Category:Non-userspace pages using User sandbox.

Conclusion

• What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?

• Will Citation bot ever be set free to roam the project?
• What's the deal with all those book links that InternetArchiveBot is adding to articles?
• Should we keep using Gerrit for MediaWiki?
• What if we had a day for bots to make cosmetic edits?

These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the February 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!

Signing off... jp×g 23:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

---

(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

DYK nomination of Albert L. Harris

Hello! Your submission of Albert L. Harris at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gwillhickers (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pine Creek Baptist Church has been accepted

Pine Creek Baptist Church, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ouray Historic District has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ouray Historic District. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 15:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to discussion: FAC 4 nomination of nonmetal

Please accept this note as an invitation to participate in the discussion of this latest FAC nomination for the nonmetal article.

The context is that you were involved in the FAC 3 discussion for the article (which was not prompted) or you are an editor who made a recent edit to the nonmetal article.

Thank you. Sandbh (talk) 07:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Colorado online meeting 02/08/2022

WikiProject Colorado

What's up with Wikipedia and WikiProject Colorado? Join us for an online meeting from 7:30 to 8:30 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 8, 2022, at meet.google.com/ksx-wksh-eba

If you don't want to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.
Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Francis P. Smith (architect)

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Francis P. Smith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Albert L. Harris

On 8 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Albert L. Harris, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as municipal architect, Albert L. Harris led the design of all city buildings in Washington, D.C., from 1921 until his sudden death in 1934? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Albert L. Harris. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Albert L. Harris), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Federal Building and U.S. Court House

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Federal Building and U.S. Court House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Williams Cemetery

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Williams Cemetery".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:31, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Benjamin Bosworth Smith (architect)

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Benjamin Bosworth Smith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Henry and Ida Owen Mays House has been accepted

James Henry and Ida Owen Mays House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauderdale High School has been accepted

Lauderdale High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 09:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bungalow Colony Historic District

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bungalow Colony Historic District, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Building at 400 East Third Street has been accepted

Building at 400 East Third Street, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 20:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dr. Martin G. Brumbaugh Graded School

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dr. Martin G. Brumbaugh Graded School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Water Street Historic District (Clifton, Tennessee) has been accepted

Water Street Historic District (Clifton, Tennessee), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:20, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for St. John's Episcopal Church (Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands)

On 22 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article St. John's Episcopal Church (Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alexander Hamilton, a future United States Founding Father, attended St. John's Episcopal Church in his youth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St. John's Episcopal Church (Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, St. John's Episcopal Church (Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Discussion on WT:USRD

There is a discussion on WP:USRD that you may be interested in since you recently undid a redirection at County Route 236 (Onondaga County, New York). It's about good articles that may not meet the GNG. –Fredddie™ 00:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CHICL color

Template:CHICL color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:USMS color

Template:USMS color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Gillespie-Selden Historic District

Hi, can you please fix reference 1, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lapham Field House

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lapham Field House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lapham Field House (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lapham Field House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lapham Field House, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 22:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Please revert your closure

Please revert your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Route 236 (Onondaga County, New York) (2nd nomination). Not only has it not been the required 7 days, but you are not an uninvolved editor in the matter. --Rschen7754 04:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

User:Rschen7754: You and me and everyone else who actually considered the 2012 discussion wants the article merged, per 2012 decision. There is no point besides having drama to dragging something out. Or do you want to punish me somehow? I am simply trying to carry out the 2012 decision. I don't ever invoke "wp:IAR", but that rather seems to apply, if you are wanting to invoke some rule to simply make some non-productive point. --Doncram (talk) 05:04, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Merged is not the same as redirected. --Rschen7754 05:12, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

[edit conflict] Alternatively, you could just redirect the article like it was for 10 entire years and we could consider the matter resolved.--Rschen7754 05:12, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

[edit conflict] You and everyone else in 2012 Talk:County Route 236 (Onondaga County, New York)/GA2 chose "Merge". That is the obvious consensus. It was not implmented, as I happened to notice recently when the old AFD was edited. I sorry if I have offended you somehow, if that is what has happened, by my objecting to your opening a new AFD. Indeed I think your action was unnecessary and unhelpful and was and is just causing drama. The right thing to do is just to close it. What could you possibly want now? Do you just want to chastise me or humiliate me or the like? Please just drop it. --Doncram (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Deletion review for County Route 236 (Onondaga County, New York)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of County Route 236 (Onondaga County, New York). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Rschen7754 05:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Pursuant to WP:DPR#NAC, I have vacated your closure of this AFD and reopened it to allow for the customary 7 day debate period. Remember that it is almost never appropriate to close a deletion discussion in which you have yourself expressed a view. Stifle (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Architect

Can you please archive this page, it's getting so long! I happened across Leon B. Senter in draftspace recently and rewrote/expanded it. It is now linked from around a dozen articles related to Oklahoma architecture. You might find the paragraph on the Tulsa Coliseum interesting (it has details missing from Tulsa Coliseum). As usual, fixes welcome. MB 05:20, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justus Bissing Jr. Historic District has been accepted

Justus Bissing Jr. Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:29, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Rock Site has been accepted

Black Rock Site, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 02:23, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plaza Theater (Burlington, Kansas) has been accepted

Plaza Theater (Burlington, Kansas), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 15:49, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

• From the team: Selection of a new Signpost Editor-in-Chief

• News and notes: Impacts of Russian invasion of Ukraine

• Opinion: Why student editors are good for Wikipedia

• Special report: A presidential candidate's team takes on Wikipedia

• In the media: Wiki-drama in the UK House of Commons

• Serendipity: War photographers: from Crimea (1850s) to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022)

• Technology report: Community Wishlist Survey results

• WikiProject report: 10 years of tea

• Featured content: Featured Content returns

• Deletion report: The 10 most SHOCKING deletion discussions of February

• Recent research: How editors and readers may be emotionally affected by disasters and terrorist attacks

• Arbitration report: Parties remonstrate, arbs contemplate, skeptics coordinate

• By the numbers: Does birthplace affect the frequency of Wikipedia biography articles?

• Gallery: The vintage exhibit

• Traffic report: Euphoria, Pamela Anderson, lies and Netflix

• News from Diff: The Wikimania 2022 Core Organizing Team

• Crossword: A Crossword, featuring Featured Articles

• Humour: Notability of mailboxes

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: First National Bank Building (Smith Center, Kansas) has been accepted

First National Bank Building (Smith Center, Kansas), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:48, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Library color

Template:Library color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis Werner Barn has been accepted

Louis Werner Barn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Lustron Homes

Hello,

The Wisconsin Historical Society is a great resource for information on Lustrons, including photographs. Here are the ones for Dane County (Madison, Monona, Verona): https://wisconsinhistory.org/Records?&terms=lustron&facets=County%3a%22Dane%22. I live in the neighborhood where most of them are located in Madison, and we have a walking tour website: https://www.cityofmadison.com/dpced/planning/documents/Westmorland%20Walking%20Tour.pdf. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuggernautMapper (talk • contribs) 23:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Olathe sweet corn

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Olathe sweet corn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Help

Hello, Doncram !. You can help me ? I can't find some article in English Wikipedia. I mean Central Lowland. Please, look at this map, you'll see Central Lowland. But, i can't find this article in English Wikipedia. Please, help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.151.136.237 (talk) 06:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi there. The map you link to is an interesting one in showing US geography in a good way, but the term "Central Lowland" is not commonly used to describe that area. The general area is called the Midwest (which links to Midwestern United States). Hope this helps. --Doncram (talk) 16:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lion Block has been accepted

Lion Block, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Levin Bates House has been accepted

Levin Bates House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:08, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Pointe Coupee Banner

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Pointe Coupee Banner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Simpson's Rest

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simpson's Rest, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Downtown Longmont Historic District

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Downtown Longmont Historic District, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Empson Cannery

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Empson Cannery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:09, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:T.M. Callahan House

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:T.M. Callahan House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Gold Miner Hotel

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gold Miner Hotel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bisbee Residential Historic District

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bisbee Residential Historic District, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bisbee Historic District

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bisbee Historic District, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

• From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine

• News and notes: Of safety and anonymity

• Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera

• Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary

• Eyewitness Wikimedian, Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps

• Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks

• In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff

• Recent research: Top scholarly citers, lack of open access references, predicting editor departures

• Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond

• Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now

• Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon

• Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors

• Traffic report: War, what is it good for?

• Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine

• Gallery: "All we are saying is, give peace a chance..."

• From the archives: Burn, baby burn

• Essay: Yes, the sky is blue

• Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja

• On the bright side: The bright side of news

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:49, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Ice House (Flagstaff, Arizona)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Ice House (Flagstaff, Arizona), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022 WikiProject Finance & Investment Newsletter

WikiProject Finance & Investment April 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the April newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our first regular newsletter and has plenty of exciting announcements. You have received this because you added yourself as a participant to the project, but will only receive future newsletters if you sign up for the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to do so. April Drive: The month-long April Content-creation Drive is now underway. The drive's target is to improve Wikipedia's coverage of financial markets. Awards will be given to everyone who improves or creates at least one article in the topic area. Sign up here! New layout: The layout of the WikiProject has been greatly improved, with a navigation bar being added to the top of every page and separate pages for assessment and edit requests, templates, resources, and news. Come take a look! Signing up for the newsletter: To sign up for future newsletters about upcoming drives, recent promotions, and other miscellaneous topics, add yourself to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance & Investment/Mailing list. You will then receive them in your talk page regularly. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 22:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC) To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rice, Arizona

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rice, Arizona, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Central School (Peoria, Arizona)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Central School (Peoria, Arizona), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Grant Road (Los Alamos, New Mexico)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Grant Road (Los Alamos, New Mexico), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ouray Historic District has been accepted

Ouray Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Downtown Longmont Historic District has been accepted

Downtown Longmont Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gold Miner Hotel has been accepted

Gold Miner Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Central School (Peoria, Arizona) has been accepted

Central School (Peoria, Arizona), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: T.M. Callahan House has been accepted

T.M. Callahan House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Osborne Public Carnegie Library has been accepted

Osborne Public Carnegie Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 01:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Downs Carnegie Library has been accepted

Downs Carnegie Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bull Pasture

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bull Pasture".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:De Luxe Florida

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "De Luxe Florida".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alpine Pass

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alpine Pass".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alfred H. Bordelon House

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alfred H. Bordelon House".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Willis Adams Marean

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Willis Adams Marean".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Country Club Historic District (Denver, Colorado)

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Country Club Historic District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:American Federation of Human Rights Headquarters

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "American Federation of Human Rights Headquarters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Three-part commercial

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Three-part commercial".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Land Utilization Program Headquarters

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Land Utilization Program Headquarters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Luis Muñoz Rivera School

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Luis Muñoz Rivera School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:McCormick House (Trinidad, Colorado)

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "McCormick House".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Naco Border Station

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naco Border Station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oxley Barn has been accepted

Oxley Barn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 03:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naco Border Station has been accepted

Naco Border Station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bowie School District No. 14

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bowie School District No. 14, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Keith Barn has been accepted

Harry Keith Barn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bowie School District No. 14 has been accepted

Bowie School District No. 14, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: North Fork Solomon River Lattice Truss Bridge has been accepted

North Fork Solomon River Lattice Truss Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:53, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Michael Stenmark

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael Stenmark".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Roald Amundsen's Home

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roald Amundsen's Home".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Prescott Armory Historic District

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prescott Armory Historic District, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuhrt Ranch has been accepted

Kuhrt Ranch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miller Farmstead (La Crosse, Kansas) has been accepted

Miller Farmstead (La Crosse, Kansas), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 01:27, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

• News and notes: Double trouble

• In the media: The battlegrounds outside and inside Wikipedia

• Special report: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war

• Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (Part 2)

• Technology report: 8-year-old attribution issues in Media Viewer

• Featured content: Wikipedia's best content from March

• In focus: Editing difficulties on Russian Wikipedia

• Gallery: A voyage around the world with WLM winners

• Interview: On a war and a map

• Serendipity: Wikipedia loves photographs, but hates photographers

• Traffic report: Justice Jackson, the Smiths, and an invasion

• Recent research: Student edits as "civic engagement"; how Wikipedia readers interact with images

• News from the WMF: How Smart is the SMART Copyright Act?

• Essay: The problem with elegant variation

• Humour: Really huge message boxes

• From the archives: Wales resigned WMF board chair in 2006 reorganization

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Concord's Colonial Inn

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Concord's Colonial Inn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Farmers National Bank (Stafford, Kansas) has been accepted

Farmers National Bank (Stafford, Kansas), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022 WikiProject Finance & Investment Newsletter

WikiProject Finance & Investment May 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the May newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our second regular newsletter. You have received this because you have been added to the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to unsubscribe. April Drive finished: The month-long April Content-creation Drive has now concluded. Our first content drive was a great start for what will be a regular feature of our Wikiproject. We will be doing them every other month, so there's none for May, but I look forward to seeing you sign up for the June edition. The drive's target was to improve Wikipedia's coverage of financial markets. Awards were given to those who participated. June Drive topic for discussion: We're currently brainstorming topics for our June Content-creation Drive. Join the discussion here. Content work: Two articles in our purview have received DYK nominations. Real Estate Bank of Arkansas was created and nominated by Hog Farm and Ranchlander National Bank was created and nominated by Sammi Brie. They're currently running in the WikiCup, so good luck to them! UBS has been nominated for a Good article reassessment. If you wish to help, leave comments in the nomination. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 10:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC) To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Florence Townsite Historic District

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Florence Townsite Historic District, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry K. and Mary E. Shaffer House has been accepted

Henry K. and Mary E. Shaffer House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 09:12, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valley View Leasing and Mining Company Mill has been accepted

Valley View Leasing and Mining Company Mill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:43, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Doncram! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Set preferences or what for vertical quotes and apostrophes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of bank buildings

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of bank buildings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Behrman Ranch has been accepted

Behrman Ranch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 00:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of bank buildings has been accepted

List of bank buildings, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 00:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Church of Christ, Scientist, churches

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Church of Christ".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:52, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:J. Walter Stevens

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "J. Walter Stevens".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Campbell House (Lexington, Kentucky)

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Campbell House".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AXA Building has been accepted

AXA Building, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Altamaha Apartments has been accepted

Altamaha Apartments, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 01:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Atlantic306, thanks for accepting this and another article just now. I see you added template:Refimprove tags, though I don't exactly understand, because everything in the (admittedly short) articles are well-referenced IMHO. I do understand you might think the articles could be improved by expanding them, perhaps with additional sources, but that is a different matter than saying the articles' referencing needs to be improved to support what the articles say. Anyhow, thanks for your contributing in AFC. sincerely, Doncram (talk) 01:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

The problem is reference 1 which only goes to a search page here regards Atlantic306 (talk) 01:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Atlantic306, thanks for your quick reply. Ah, I see that is about the widely used template:NRISref, a reference to NRIS database. I do agree the reference should be improved, have worked to improve it, don't recall exact status but I believe I was stymied at its Talk page. If you want to re-start anything there, please ping me from there. --Doncram (talk) 01:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: First National Bank of Douglas County has been accepted

First National Bank of Douglas County, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AviationFreak💬 02:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Colorado online meeting 05/17/2022

WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold a short online meeting from 7:30 to 8:30 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 17, 2022, at meet.google.com/zwd-ojag-enp

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Salida Livestock Commission Company

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Salida Livestock Commission Company".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:St. Charles River Bridge (Devine, Colorado)

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "St. Charles River Bridge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:R.T. Frazier House

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "R.T. Frazier House".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Hay hood

On 17 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hay hood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some barns have hoods? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hay hood. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hay hood), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Virginia Tillery Round Barn, with a hay hood, in Illinois

Thanks, User:MB, for including me in that, I didn't know it was going to DYK. I like its brief hook, and your choice of photo of Virginia Tillery Round Barn in Illinois as an illustration of hay hood upon a round barn. It was nice to be surprised by that a few days ago! --Doncram (talk) 18:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Did you see the merge proposal with Catshead? MB 18:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ward School (Ward, Colorado) has been accepted

Ward School (Ward, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, User:DGG, and I have further edited the article to add info and clean it up in regards to some stray notes I had left in it as a draft.--Doncram (talk) 18:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Pence House has been accepted

Adam Pence House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, User:Bkissin. Hey, I also set up a redirect at Adam Pence to go to Adam Pence House#Adam Pence, and I just added WikiProject Biography with its parameters to its Talk page, which also appear now at Talk:Adam Pence House. (BTW I think you might have added WikiProject Biography there, and I already had added it there, before the redirect was set up.) Probably it should not appear in both places. What do you think is correct protocol for this? sincerely, Doncram (talk) 17:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Kings Courtyard Inn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kings Courtyard Inn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings Courtyard Inn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Cotton Sail Hotel has been accepted

The Cotton Sail Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 15:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Shell Gas Station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shell Gas Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shell Gas Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dr vulpes (talk) 04:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Colburn Hotel

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Colburn Hotel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

• From the team: A changing of the guard

• News and notes: 2022 Wikimedia Board elections

• Community view: Have your say in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board elections

• Opinion: The Wikimedia Endowment – a lack of transparency

• In the media: Putin, Jimbo, Musk and more

• Special report: Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war

• In focus: Measuring gender diversity in Wikipedia articles

• Discussion report: Portals, April Fools, admin activity requirements and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19 revisited

• Technology report: A new video player for Wikimedia wikis

• Featured content: Featured content of April

• Interview: Wikipedia's pride

• Serendipity: Those thieving image farms

• Recent research: 35 million Twitter links analysed

• Tips and tricks: The reference desks of Wikipedia

• Traffic report: Strange highs and strange lows

• News from Diff: Winners of the Human rights and Environment special nomination by Wiki Loves Earth announced

• News from the WMF: The EU Digital Services Act: What’s the Deal with the Deal?

• Video: How the entire country of Qatar was blocked from editing

• Gallery: Diving under the sea for World Oceans Day

• From the archives: The Onion and Wikipedia

• Essay: How not to write a Wikipedia article

• Humour: A new crossword

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Finance & Investment June 2022 Newsletter

WikiProject Finance & Investment June 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the June newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our third regular newsletter. You have received this because you have been added to the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to unsubscribe. June Drive: The month-long June Content-creation Drive is now underway. The drive's target is to improve Wikipedia's coverage of stock exchanges. Awards will be given to everyone who improves or creates at least one article in the topic area. Sign up here! Content work: Two articles in our purview have received DYK nominations. Google Wallet was created and nominated by InfiniteNexus and George D. Gould was created and nominated by Ktin. Ktin is currently running in the WikiCup, so good luck to him! UBS's Good Article Reassessment is still ongoing. If you wish to help, leave comments in the nomination. Cheque was selected as an Article for improvement on May 16 for one week. You can see the improvement during that period here. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. — — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 07:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC) To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list page.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Florence Townsite Historic District

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Florence Townsite Historic District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Francis de Sales Church (Geneva, New York) has been accepted

St. Francis de Sales Church (Geneva, New York), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

June 8: NYBG Environment of The Bronx - Editing Wikipedia for Beginners

Wednesday June 8, 11am-5pm: New York Botanical Garden - Environment of the Bronx - Editing Wikipedia for Beginners

Hello Doncram! The LuEsther T. Mertz Library of the New York Botanical Garden and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you and the general public of all experience levels to come to the Mertz Library in person and learn how to use Wikipedia and write about the environment of the Bronx! All skill levels welcome at the event! Experienced Wikipedia editors from the Wikimedia New York City chapter will be in attendance and available to help. A one hour training session will be offered at the start of this event covering introductory topics. Attendees familiar with editing Wikipedia can edit off of a worklist focused on the environment of New York City; as well as, a sub-list focused on the environment of the Bronx. The Mertz Library will pull topical media from their collection to assist the editing. --Wikimedia New York City Team via Wil540 art (talk) 02:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cruz Trading Post

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cruz Trading Post, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cruz Trading Post has been accepted

Cruz Trading Post, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Monberg (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Lawrence Monberg may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Main and South Elm Streets Historic District has been accepted

South Main and South Elm Streets Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woodstock (Trenton, Kentucky) has been accepted

Woodstock (Trenton, Kentucky), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:06, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gila River Bridge has been accepted

Gila River Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 05:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hackberry Creek Bridge has been accepted

Hackberry Creek Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 00:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Juana Rodríguez Morales House

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Juana Rodríguez Morales House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darwin Ranch has been accepted

Darwin Ranch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:46, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur Larkin House has been accepted

Arthur Larkin House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:44, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tina Peters

The article Tina Peters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation pages are used when there are multiple notable topics associated with a name, which isn't the case here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:19, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

• News and notes: WMF inks new rules on government-ordered takedowns, blasts Russian feds' censor demands, spends big bucks

• In the media: Editor given three-year sentence, big RfA makes news, Guy Standing takes it sitting down

• Special report: "Wikipedia's independence" or "Wikimedia's pile of dosh"?

• Discussion report: MoS rules on CCP name mulled, XRV axe plea nulled, BLPPROD drafting bid pulled

• Opinion: Picture of the Day – how Adam plans to ru(i)n it

• Featured content: Articles on Scots' clash, Yank's tux, Austrian's action flick deemed brilliant prose

• Essay: RfA trend line haruspicy: fact or fancy?

• Recent research: Wikipedia versus academia (again), tables' "immortality" probed

• Serendipity: Was she really a Swiss lesbian automobile racer?

• News from the WMF: Wikimedia Enterprise signs first deals

• Traffic report: Top view counts for shows, movies, and celeb lawsuit that keeps on giving

• Gallery: Celebration of summer, winter

• Humour: Shortcuts, screwballers, Simon & Garfunkel

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Charles E. Shepard

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charles E. Shepard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

John Ross Farm page

Hello, I am writing to you because of the content you left on the page Talk:John Ross Farm. I think this is just normal for all pages, but I wanted to be sure I hadn't made a mistake. I not a part of the Wikiprojects you listed. I also created Gary Public Schools Memorial Auditorium, Griffith State Bank and Henry and Caroline Schrage House recently. If I have made an error, I will probably need to correct those pages as well. They are short but I will work on them over time.

I hope the page won't be deleted. Reading what you have experienced depresses me, but I learned a few things. I don't know why someone would start deleting pages about historical sites and communities. I noticed serveral Indiana pages being deleted and I tried to stop it but they did it again in a different place. XZae (talk) 22:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi XZae, i think your new articles on John Ross Farm and those others you mention are all fine contributions. You didn't make any "mistakes" ad far as i know. What i added at Talk:John Ross Farm was routine, just adding banners for two WikiProjects which should be interested, if/when they are actively engaging in any drive to improve articles in their topic area. You could add similar banners at the other ones. I am a member of WikiProject NRHP and invite you to join, which is done simply by your adding your username at the relevant section on wp:NRHP (shortcut to the project). Whether u do that or not, you are welcome to post at the wikiproject's Talk page wt:NRHP. I myself mostly work on historic sites articles, and i add other WikiProject banners like WikiProject Trains on articles about historic locomotives or train stations, WikiProject Lighthousrs for those, etc.

I'm not aware of the Indiana articles you mention being deleted; I'd be happy if you could point me to their AFD processes to review, and in the future for u also notify me here (or all NRHP editors at wt:NRHP if it's an NRHP historic site article at stake) on any new deletion attempts. Almost always being NRHP-listed means effective immunity from deletion though. You may have noted on this page that I experienced different treatment regarding Historic Hotels of America sites, which is different.

Thanks for contributing those articles, and keep it up, please! I may comment at your tal page with some tips. I hope you do welcome my additions to the John Ross Farm page, including link to big NRHP nomination document. Which i hope you and/or i might use to add more info to the article. Cheers, --Doncram (talk) 11:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Category:Central hall plan architecture has been nominated for merging and renaming

Category:Central hall plan architecture has been nominated for merging and renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:35, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prescott Armory Historic District has been accepted

Prescott Armory Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 15:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Administration Building for the City of Grand Forks at the Grand Forks Airport

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Administration Building for the City of Grand Forks at the Grand Forks Airport, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wabash Plain Dealer

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wabash Plain Dealer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Insurance Building (Ellsworth, Kansas)

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Insurance Building (Ellsworth, Kansas), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:08, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Miner's Hat

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miner's Hat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cozad Downtown Historic District has been accepted

Cozad Downtown Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Drafts that need taken care of

Someone has been making all these drafts about steam locomotives without adding links citations or any in-depth info. Just brief descriptions. For example: Draft:Hampton & Branchville 44, Draft:Cherokee Brick & Tile 1, Draft:Hillcrest Lumber Company 9, Draft:Hillcrest Lumber Company 10, Draft:Phenix Marble Company 1, Draft:Polson Logging Co. 2, Draft:Lowville and Beaver River Railroad 8, Draft:Wilmington and Western 58, and Draft:Canadian Pacific 2839 If you would take care of at least some or one of these drafts, that would be great. 23.169.64.51 (talk) 18:57, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Okay, i have commented at each of those pages similarly and in general suggest working together on the draft list-article instead. Please see my statement at User talk:70.189.24.158#Something about your pages., including where I am asking you to participate using your username, too. Either way, though, thanks for your attention to this area. Sincerely, --Doncram (talk) 21:38, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: West High School (Auburn, New York) has been accepted

West High School (Auburn, New York), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: North Central Historic District (Alexander City, Alabama) has been accepted

North Central Historic District (Alexander City, Alabama), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 02:57, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juana Rodríguez Morales House has been accepted

Juana Rodríguez Morales House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atmore Commercial Historic District has been accepted

Atmore Commercial Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Napa River Inn has been accepted

Napa River Inn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:NOPSI New Orleans

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NOPSI New Orleans".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Hiestand House has been accepted

Jacob Hiestand House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Slywriter (talk) 03:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kendall Hotel has been accepted

Kendall Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:56, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mount Barbara

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mount Barbara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ezra A. Huntingon House has been accepted

Ezra A. Huntingon House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 04:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenwood Cemetery (Homer, New York) has been accepted

Glenwood Cemetery (Homer, New York), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 22:43, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Preserved engine drafts

Out of curiosity, are you using visual edits to create your drafts on preserved locomotives in the United States and Canada? Because if you’re using source editing, then the final product might not be as good, if you delete certain important text. 2600:100C:B21B:B7BB:98B5:847D:87C5:4896 (talk) 15:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

No, I don't know about "visual edits" and assume that is a new thing. I have been using old-fashioned source editing in my ongoing, slow development of list-articles at Draft:Preserved locomotives in the United States and Draft:Preserved locomotives in Canada, and maybe possibly separate drafts about some individual locomotives. To the non-logged-in editor, could you possibly please advise me more on what I have been missing? Thanks for contacting me. I don't think i can ping you in this reply or otherwise contact you (please inform me if there is some way). --Doncram (talk) 15:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:La Grande Princesse School

Hello, Doncram. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "La Grande Princesse School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Goodnight House has been accepted

Goodnight House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 00:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel Lindo has been accepted

Hotel Lindo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garfield Historic District (Poplar Bluff, Missouri) has been accepted

Garfield Historic District (Poplar Bluff, Missouri), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

• From the editors: Rise of the machines, or something

• News and notes: Information considered harmful

• In the media: Censorship, medieval hoaxes, "pathetic supervillains", FB-WMF AI TL bid, dirty duchess deeds done dirt cheap

• Op-Ed: The "recession" affair

• Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (part 3)

• Election guide: The chosen six: 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections

• Community view: Youth culture and notability

• Opinion: Criminals among us

• Arbitration report: Winds of change blow for cyclone editors, deletion dustup draws toward denouement

• Deletion report: This is Gonzo Country

• Discussion report: Notability for train stations, notices for mobile editors, noticeboards for the rest of us

• Traffic report: US TV, JP ex-PM, outer space, and politics of IN, US, UK top charts for July

• Featured content: A little list with surprisingly few lists

• Tips and tricks: Cleaning up awful citations with Citation bot

• In focus: Wikidata insights from a handy little tool

• On the bright side: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war — three (more) stories

• Essay: How to research an image

• Recent research: A century of rulemaking on Wikipedia analyzed

• Serendipity: Don't cite Wikipedia

• Gallery: A backstage pass

• From the archives: 2012 Russian Wikipedia shutdown as it happened

• Humour: Why did the chicken cross the road?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lake Andes Carnegie Library has been accepted

Lake Andes Carnegie Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Coolidge Octagon House (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Coolidge Octagon House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:07, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Colorado online meeting 08/16/2022

WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 16, 2022, at meet.google.com/bqn-jhaw-ewc. Anyone interested in Colorado is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

El Dorado Apartments

Doncram, I think that both of your versions of the hatnote are better than what I put there. Thanks for the improvement. Leschnei (talk) 11:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prairie Museum has been accepted

Prairie Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magnolia Springs Historic District has been accepted

Magnolia Springs Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 19:09, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brunell House (Jessamine St., Magnolia Springs, Alabama) has been accepted

Brunell House (Jessamine St., Magnolia Springs, Alabama), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 14:37, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John C. Brown House has been accepted

John C. Brown House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 09:48, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: White Stallion Ranch has been accepted

White Stallion Ranch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 22:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Central Historic District has been accepted

South Central Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 22:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel La Rose has been accepted

Hotel La Rose, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 10:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Bates Log House has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bates Log House. Thanks! KylieTastic (talk) 11:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Downtown Morehead Historic District has been accepted

Downtown Morehead Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Spa at Norwich Inn has been accepted

The Spa at Norwich Inn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:National Hotel (Miami Beach, Florida) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:National Hotel (Miami Beach, Florida). Thanks! Storchy (talk) 06:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

• News and notes: Admins wanted on English Wikipedia, IP editors not wanted on Farsi Wiki, donations wanted everywhere

• Special report: Wikimania 2022: no show, no show up?

• In the media: Truth or consequences? A tough month for truth

• Discussion report: Boarding the Trustees

• News from Wiki Education: 18 years a Wikipedian: what it means to me

• In focus: Thinking inside the box

• Tips and tricks: The unexpected rabbit hole of typo fixing in citations...

• Technology report: Vector (2022) deployment discussions happening now

• Serendipity: Two photos of every library on earth

• Featured content: Our man drills are safe for work, but our Labia is Fausta.

• Recent research: The dollar value of "official" external links

• Traffic report: What dreams (and heavily trafficked articles) may come

• Essay: Delete the junk!

• Gallery: A Fringe Affair (but not the show by Edward W. Feery that was on this year)

• Humour: CommonsComix No. 1

• From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stradal House has been accepted

Stradal House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greystone Miami Beach has been accepted

Greystone Miami Beach, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 09:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Tina Peters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tina Peters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Peters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cactus Tour

A tag has been placed on Category:Cactus Tour indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Go ahead. Congratulations. There does exist Draft:Cactus Tour which would be in it, and various golf clubs / hotels / resorts that are regularly on the tour, that will be in it. Maybe you could just promote the Cactus Tour article? But sure, the category can be deleted and re-created, perhaps multiple times. --Doncram (talk) 01:14, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Van B. Snook House has been accepted

Van B. Snook House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Calloway House (Eminence, Kentucky) has been accepted

Calloway House (Eminence, Kentucky), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 10:16, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Old Town Fort Collins has been accepted

Old Town Fort Collins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben Moran House has been accepted

Ben Moran House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 09:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Italian Cultural Register and Draft:Casa Ferrario

Hi Doncram! I have been doing some additional research and it looks like I found something which somewhat resembles a national register for historic places in Italy. Well, it is more like a catalog, and also comprises cultural objects which are not actual buildings and places. Moreover, I've looked at it a bit more in detail and definitely looks incomplete. Here is the link [12]. I also take advantage from this message to ask you if you could provide some help in editing and publishing the draft for Casa Ferrario, a historic Art Nouveau building in Milan. Thank you in advance! Plumbago Capensis (talk) 08:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stoker House has been accepted

Stoker House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Pending AfC submissions by Doncram

Hello, Doncram,

This category has popped up on the Empty categories list and should be tagged for CSD C1 speedy deletion. But I wanted to ask you if you expected it to remain empty? If you could assign a draft to this category, it would be safe from deletion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Liz, thanks for letting me know. Not sure if this is the right way forward, but I created the category as has existed before, and there should be five Draft articles in it right now. But the DannyS712 bot disables them, emptying the category, quite promptly. Making the category "hidden" did not change anything. I have a request at User talk:DannyS712#request exclusion of a user-type category from those disabled by bot.

For the moment, I put template:Possibly empty category in the category; do you think that will take it off of whatever worklist you see?

Thanks, --Doncram (talk) 01:30, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

I found my way to seeing that AfC's categories by date have template:Maintenance category, and cross my fingers hope that will work to deter the bot. --Doncram (talk) 01:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cactus Tour has been accepted

Cactus Tour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nosebagbear (talk) 15:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TexasHistoricalCommissionNote

Template:TexasHistoricalCommissionNote has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tina Peters (Colorado) has been accepted

Tina Peters (Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SWinxy (talk) 19:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Hotel (Miami Beach, Florida) has been accepted

National Hotel (Miami Beach, Florida), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 08:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

• News and notes: Board vote results, bot's big GET, crat chat gives new mop, WMF seeks "sound logo" and "organizer lab"

• In focus: NPP: Still heaven or hell for new users – and for the reviewers

• In the media: A few complaints and mild disagreements

• Special report: Decentralized Fundraising, Centralized Distribution

• Discussion report: Much ado about Fox News

• Interview: ScottishFinnishRadish's Request for Adminship

• Opinion: Are we ever going to reach consensus?

• Serendipity: Removing watermarks, copyright signs and cigarettes from photos

• Recent research: How readers assess Wikipedia's trustworthiness, and how they could in the future

• Traffic report: Kings and queens and VIPs

• Featured content: Farm-fresh content

• Gallery: A Festival Descends on the City: The Edinburgh Fringe, Pt. 2

• CommonsComix: CommonsComix 2: Paulus Moreelse

• From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 Years ago: September 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Doncram. Thank you for creating Washington Monument and Mount Vernon Place. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 21:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel H. Atwater House has been accepted

Samuel H. Atwater House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Young's Park (Overland Park, Kansas)

The article Young's Park (Overland Park, Kansas) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a regular non-notable city park in a suburb of Kansas City. Unliked to have in depth third party coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Grey Wanderer (talk) 07:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:American election deniers has been nominated for deletion

Category:American election deniers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Endwise (talk) 18:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Crocheron–McDowall House

Hi there! I saw your question at Crocheron–McDowall House. English is not my first language so I appreciate you helping out. Any edits or suggestions are welcomed so feel free to make more if you'd like! MX (✉ • ✎) 17:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steamboat Springs Downtown Historic District has been accepted

Steamboat Springs Downtown Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Water Board Building

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Water Board Building requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Waddles 🗩 🖉 22:48, 22 October 2022 (UTC) And I was also templated by Dan arndt (talk) 23:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC) which had effect of posting exactly the same big message. There's already been discussion at Talk:Water Board Building about the topic.

User:Dan arndt and User:WaddlesJP13, could you please cease using Twinkle to make postings like this, if Twinkle is what you are doing, or otherwise change what you're doing so as not post a defective message. The message directs me to go to a certain page and to press a button that is supposed to be there, if I want to contest the speedy deletion. I do contest the speedy. But there is no button there. If there is a problem with Twinkle you should work to get Twinkle fixed. I think I do recall there being a red button that worked, in the past, which was good. It allowed editors to know that in fact any reviewing admin would know that the deletion was contested. Now I don't know if a 3rd, 4th, 5th patroller or reviewer is going to come by and not see the discussion at Talk, and not be informed.

Please let me know what actions you are taking to address this. --Doncram (talk) 23:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Martin G. Brumbaugh Graded School has been accepted

Dr. Martin G. Brumbaugh Graded School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 17:40, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bates Log House has been accepted

Bates Log House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! And thanks for reading and considering (and then removing as needed) my comment about quoting and copyright stuff. I guess you agreed or at least didn't terribly mind the longish quote. And reviewing it myself now, I think the longish quote serves well in the article. Thanks again for doing what you do in AFC! Doncram (talk,contribs) 22:50, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

I had no issue with the longish quote. Had the body of the article been longer it would not have stood out as particularly long. An alternative technique might have been to use the |quote= parameter in the citation, something I've often done when wishing to include lomg(ish) quotes in short(ish) articles

AFC is a bit of fun, though it can result in burnout! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:54, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

• From the team: A new goose on the roost

• News and notes: Wikipedians question Wikimedia fundraising ethics after "somewhat-viral" tweet

• News from the WMF: Governance updates from, and for, the Wikimedia Endowment

• In the media: Scribing, searching, soliciting, spying, and systemic bias

• Disinformation report: From Russia with WikiLove

• Recent research: Disinformatsiya: Much research, but what will actually help Wikipedia editors?

• Interview: Isabelle Belato on their Request for Adminship

• Featured content: Topics, lists, submarines and Gurl.com

• Serendipity: We all make mistakes – don’t we?

• Traffic report: Mama, they're in love with a criminal

• From the archives: Paid advocacy, a lawsuit over spelling mistakes, deleting Jimbo's article, and the death of Toolserver

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Guglielmo Pugi questions

Hello. Thanks for this original article. Guglielmo Pugi was my cousin Paolo's (no Wikipedia acct) great grandfather. Paolo asks: What led you to create the article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ccirulli 11:30pm CST, 10-31-22

Hmm, that's a great question. Here is a long reply.

By the way I am just an amateur, volunteer editor in Wikipedia. It has been a hobby of mine to develop articles about historic buildings and other historic sites, most often ones listed on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places, and on the way I have created a good number of articles about buildings' architects whose designs led to the buildings being recognized for their architecture. And sometimes about architects who randomly happened to be the architect who designed a building where some important event happened later which made the place notable. And sometimes, but less frequently, about sculptors whose works are at the historic place, or perhaps made the place notable.

I created the article Guglielmo Pugi and brought it up to this version on 27 June 2016. I didn't have much to go on, but it clarifies relationship of Pugi to firms involving his sons. (Did I get it right? Please say if you have any corrections!)

Just looking at the article and its edit history alone, I see no great clue to remind me why or how I got there in particular. But I have a very faint recollection of creating that article as a pleasant detour, and feeling self-satisfied, a bit proud, because i felt i did a good job. Usually self-satisfaction is the only reward we get here; it is uncommon to get any recognition at all for most articles, really. (Although I am gratified that some fellow editors sometimes comment kindly, and in the past I accumulated a number of "barnstars".) But it is extremely rare to hear from a relative of the subject of an article, particularly one who lived so long ago!

What i did first, just now, was figure out how to see my own contributions around 27 June 2016 (note to myself: on my contributions page, select drop-down "search for contributions" at top, then select a date range). Then I see that just previously i was editing at C.J.A. Ericson (about an American businessman and legislator) and before that at Ericson Public Library (building listed on the National Register, which CJA Ericson funded).

And I see what probably brought me there, my making this edit adding NRHP reference to Ericson Public Library like I often do to facilitate further development of National Register topics. (In fact, from that time I also see this diff, where I mention to editor Farragutful that I was then working through a list of 65 Iowa NRHP articles needing improvement. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 06:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)) )

And in that edit of 27 June 2016, I happened to try wikilinking C.J.A. Ericson's name, as I probably wondered if there was already an article about him, given what the article already said about him being a legislator and all. Apparently there was not an article, and I felt I had enough info to start one, and I did: I created it and brought it up to this version on 27 June 2016. And I felt it was okay to mention there exists a bust of C.J.A. Ericson that was created by Guglielmo Pugi. And I wikilinked that name, wondering if there was already an article... perhaps he was a sculptor in the U.S., or if he was in Italy then perhaps he could be a major sculptor there, I certainly wouldn't know! There was no article, but I searched and found at least the two sources I cited. Now, and maybe back then, there are numerous mentions of him at art gallery webpages which suggest he is important, that he created works that are valued today. For example this one at Mayfair Gallery gives a short biography about him, with maybe some new bits of information.

How would he have gotten connected to CJA Ericson? Perhaps at one of those international shows the Mayfair Gallery page mentions?

(Hmm, maybe i could have started instead by looking up "what links here" for the article. It is, alas, linked from only one article, C.J.A. Ericson. I would have expected it to get linked from more articles over these years!)

My creation of the article was, in effect, identifying Pugi as probably an interesting person with a body of work worth being recognized in the encyclopedia. I would be very interested to find more biographical information, or about his body of work, and it would be great to find out about photos might perhaps be obtained. What kinds of information do you happen to have about him, I wonder? Hmm, it is your cousin whose great grandfather is G. Pugi, who might have info.

Maybe i will reply even a bit further, tomorrow or another day, but I am tired now, and it is late for me now, past midnight. Thank you for writing! Feel free to say more, or to pass on more to/from your cousin! You or your cousin could send an email by using "Email this user" link on my User page. Good night. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 06:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Ccirulli, G. Pugi is now also listed at List of sculptors from Italy along with very famous others. And earlier i made some clarifications, additions to above long statement. Cheerios! Doncram (talk,contribs) 02:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

@Doncram

Thanks for your generous reply.

I will see to it that cousin Paolo is in touch by email. We are related on his paternal side. His mothers's maiden name is Pugi.

Your Wikipedia work is impressive. I can appreciate it because I also am a contributor, with over 1000 edits and a handful of original articles.

A while back I did some google searches on G. Pugi and, as i recall, i mainly found galleries selling pieces on the secondary market. Some of those links may be useful in the Wiki article. I perhaps came close to creating an article, but i guess i didn't get back to it.

You did very well with the article. I agree it would be lovely to assemble some material and photos from the family archives.

Standby for more Ccirulli (talk) 13:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

@Doncram

i am aware that Wikipedia has a reference format for being told something from a reliable source.

is that an option if Paolo tells you something that cannot be otherwise corroborated ? Ccirulli (talk) 17:48, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Colorado online meeting 11/15/2022

WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 15, 2022, at meet.google.com/yoe-aphc-wey. Anyone interested in Colorado articles, history, or photographs is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Election deniers has been nominated for deletion

Category:Election deniers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 01:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Also nominated: Category:2020 United States presidential election deniers

Your submission at Articles for creation: C.B. Power Bungalow has been accepted

C.B. Power Bungalow, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mays Lick Consolidated School has been accepted

Mays Lick Consolidated School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Passengerpigeon (talk) 12:21, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

• News and notes: English Wikipedia editors: "We don't need no stinking banners"

• In the media: "The most beautiful story on the Internet"

• Interview: Lisa Seitz-Gruwell on WMF fundraising in the wake of big banner ad RfC

• Opinion: Privacy on Wikipedia in the cyberpunk future

• Disinformation report: Missed and Dissed

• Op-Ed: Diminishing returns for article quality

• Book review: Writing the Revolution

• Technology report: Galactic dreams, encyclopedic reality

• Essay: The Six Million FP Man

• Tips and tricks: (Wiki)break stuff

• Recent research: Study deems COVID-19 editors smart and cool, questions of clarity and utility for WMF's proposed "Knowledge Integrity Risk Observatory"

• Featured content: A great month for featured articles

• Obituary: A tribute to Michael Gäbler

• Concept: The relevance of legal certainty to the English Wikipedia

• Traffic report: Musical deaths, murders, Princess Di's nominative determinism, and sports

• From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago

• CommonsComix: Joker's trick

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Fargo-Moorhead YMCA Sign

Hello, Doncram. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fargo-Moorhead YMCA Sign, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deer Lodge Central Business Historic District has been accepted

Deer Lodge Central Business Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MB 17:57, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Insurance Building (Ellsworth, Kansas) has been accepted

Insurance Building (Ellsworth, Kansas), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NOPSI New Orleans has been accepted

NOPSI New Orleans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:19, 25 December 2022 (UTC)