Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FACBot 6
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 01:51, Tuesday, February 11, 2020 (UTC)
Function overview: Go through all the Featured Articles, and merge certain templates in the {{Article History}} template.
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised
Programming language(s): C#
Source code available: TBA
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates#Most supports ever garnered in a FAC? see also Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/GimmeBot 2 from 2007.
Edit period(s): A series of runs, doing more articles each time.
Estimated number of pages affected: There are 5,674 featured articles, but most should not require a change. FACBot has been performing this for featured articles upon promotion since 2014, but an error was found, under which not all peer review templates were merged.
Namespace(s): Talk
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: Go through the talk pages of featured articles and merge the {{DYK}}, {{featured article}}, {{peerreview}}, {{oldpeerreview}} and {{GA}} templates into the {{Article History}} template. If the article does not have an {{Article History}} template, then create one (but all FAs should already have one).
Discussion
[edit]Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Seems reasonable. Primefac (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Trial conducted with 50 edits. Pages updated are list here. All looks good. Some improvements were made to error handling. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Trial complete. --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hawkeye7: please remember to mark as {{BotTrialComplete}} when done, or we won't know that it isn't still in trial ;) --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Approved. Looks good to me. As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.