Jump to content

User talk:JTtheOG

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!

[edit]

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), and Frostly (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Awards for 2023

[edit]

The New Page Reviewer's Platinum Award

For over 10,000 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: American Junior Red Cross

[edit]

Okay, I added a Ref. showing notability (Re: 22 million). Also stretched out the article a little to be more all-encompassing. I mean, to give a more complete picture of the organization. It's far more notable than an athlete appearing in one game in the pros, IMO. Thanks for hopefully putting it through. However, either way, I really didn't want to spend much time on this. I just wanted to start this worthy article. It was once a major branch of the Red Cross. JimPercy (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I added some more to give it completeness. JimPercy (talk) 13:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robelyn Garcia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cross country.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kimberly Remak has been accepted

[edit]
Kimberly Remak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca talk to me! 16:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome JTtheOG! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:38, 2 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2006 NFL Europe season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frankfurt Galaxy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

[edit]
The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia   
This award is given in recognition to JTtheOG for collecting more than 500 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Winner's award

[edit]
The Content Review Medal of Merit  
This award is given in recognition to JTtheOG for collecting the most points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your staggering 1,263 reviews (1,340 total points) played a huge part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!!! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

[edit]

Unnecessarily complicated Gears Award

This award is given in recognition to JTtheOG for collecting at least 150 points during each week of the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 23:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Re-reviews award

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
This award is given to JTtheOG for doing over 25 re-reviews, in the January 2024 NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Adam Hicks (American football)

[edit]

Hey @JTtheOG

Would you mind taking another review of Draft:Adam Hicks (American football) because I added a few sources that should be able to make it notable enough to be on the main space.

I submitted it for review and I would appreciate it if you could give it another look. ParkerLyme (talk) 15:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone got to it! Good work, JTtheOG (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Review Request

[edit]

Good day, Please take a look at this article "The Next Star Awards". I've been working on it for a while and it's unreviewed. Regards. TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter

[edit]

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FEB24 Drive

[edit]

Damn, you're on a roll with this one. Thank you so much for being a dedicated member of the drive. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

about Fabio Grossi (actor)

[edit]

Good morning from Campora San Giovanni, I'm writing to say hello and find out how you are, as well as telling you that I followed your advice, I was wondering if you could lend a helping hand now. Of course, if you need anything, count on me, in the meantime I thank you for the report and while waiting to hear from you, I greet you with respect and cordiality. Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino (talk) 11:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on surpassing 1k

[edit]

I want to give a personal thank you to you for your motivation towards improving articles' references. Though you have "only" dealed with ~1% articles in the backlog, your impact is much greater than you might imagine. You have help set a fire for future endeavors to make Wikipedia more complete and comprehensive. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you have well surpassed 750 articles cited, I would like to award you the level 10 badge early. Perhaps, a quote from one of our writers who has recently passed away would be the most appropriate here for the monumental work – citing all articles on Wikipedia – that we are dealing with. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only way Completion can and will be reached is through a Herculean amount of work. Completion will also require Completionists to be bold, but civil and patient, and to some extent charismatic. This is a collaborative project! It shall also require Completionists to be discerning and travel to many places to acquire what the Encyclopedia needs. But most of all, it must be repeated, it shall require us to work. As is said of the Swabians, "Schaffe, schaffe Häusle baue" — Let's work and work, and build a house.
From User:Vami IV/Completionism
- CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! I cannot even imagine how to find sources for hundreds of unsourced articles. But these awesome editors inspire me to work harder and smarter. Thanks.Oldsanfelipe2 (talk) 19:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CactiStaccingCrane:, @Oldsanfelipe2: Thank you both. :) Happy editing. JTtheOG (talk) 03:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review of new pages.

[edit]

Hello! Could you review of these pages: Aznaur Tavaev, Azamat Akhmedov, Dmitrii Adamov, Roman Tsarev and Ruslan Belkhoroev? Thank you! -- Ricco Baroni (talk) 15:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Mexican Softball League

[edit]

Hey, brother. I just created an article for the Mexican Softball League. I was wondering if you could take a look and let me know if the article could be improved in any way. I would really appreciate it. Cheers. Cocu15 (talk) 22:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Cocu15: Great work on the article, as always. Exciting stuff going on in Mexican sports right now. I don't see too much to contribute myself but I'll try to stay updated on the league and look out for any news, for sure. JTtheOG (talk) 01:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter

[edit]

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A citation barnstar for you

[edit]
The Citation Barnstar The Citation Barnstar
Amazing show! You deserve it!! For good work during WP: FEB24 drive!!! Davidindia (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Davidindia: Thank you; I appreciate your kind words. JTtheOG (talk) 03:11, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
You deserve it for all the effort you’ve put into both New Page Patrol and the FEB24 drive. Keep up the great work! – DreamRimmer (talk) 07:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer: I appreciate it very much! JTtheOG (talk) 03:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

[edit]

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to JTtheOG for achieving first place with 1431 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

[edit]

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to JTtheOG for collecting more than 750 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Belize men's under-20 international footballers

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Belize men's under-20 international footballers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftifying articles

[edit]

I see that you have just removed two of my recently created rugby union articles into draftspace on grounds of lack of references. The Royal Bassett article has now been improved and expanded, and the number of references has been increased from two to eight, and none are primary references from their website. Therefore, can you please reinstate it back to mainspace. I shall now look to do the same with Hammersmith and Fulham and I hope you won't relegate any more of my articles from Wikipedia.Rillington (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Rillington: Royal Wootton Bassett is the club in question, thus sources 1 and 2 cannot be used to establish notability. The Rugby Football Union is directly associated with the club, thus sources 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 cannot be used to establish notability. I am sure that Source 3 has plenty of in-depth coverage of the club, but I am unable to access the text. JTtheOG (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The RFU is not associated, even indirectly, with any club - it's the sport's governing body. Therefore its website is independent of the subject.Rillington (talk) 00:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rillington: It is generally agreed upon that sports governing bodies are not independent of the teams or athletes that compete under their jurisdiction. JTtheOG (talk) 00:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the first I've heard of this and I've been producing articles on English rugby union clubs for a decade. Plus it is also generally agreed that any club which has played at tier 5 of the English rugby league system is seen as notable. RWB played at this level for three seasons and H&F currently play at this level.Rillington (talk) 11:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draft:Royal Wootton Bassett RFC has multiple primary and secondary references, including both the RFU pages as well as Rothman's Rugby Union Yearbook. These are the gold standard for rugby union and are notable sources. Tier 5 clubs play in the 'National Leagues' so this should also be considered when it comes to notability. Recommend keeping pages with note on adding future sources to help with reinforcing validaty as opposed to removing pages. Jgjsmith006 (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey. As someone who also has also been creating sports articles for over a decade, it somewhat troubling that you would think this way. The RFU is simply not an independent source. At the time of draftification, the article had two sources: a link to the club's contacts page and a dead link to a results page from 8 years ago posted by the RFU. I hope we can all agree that this is nowhere near enough sources to meet notability guidelines, no matter which tier they are currently in, and it would be irresponsible of me to mark it as patrolled. Instead of deleting a page not ready for the mainspace, I draftified it to give you (or others) enough time to come up with better sourcing and re-submit it. I'm AGF that the Rothman's Yearbook has adequate in-depth coverage of the subject, but once again, this was not present in the originally published version of the article. JTtheOG (talk) 17:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gibraltarian taxi drivers has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Gibraltarian taxi drivers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to Become a Cult Leader

[edit]

Thanks for the redundancy catch! I missed it somehow! Rp2006 (talk) 02:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, happens to the best of us! Cheers mate. JTtheOG (talk) 02:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Audi Crooks

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Audi Crooks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Audi Crooks

[edit]

The article Audi Crooks you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Audi Crooks and Talk:Audi Crooks/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

""Don't Turn Around" (Album)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect "Don't Turn Around" (Album) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21 § "Don't Turn Around" (Album) until a consensus is reached. Nickps (talk) 22:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rationales

[edit]

Hello, JTtheOG,

I'd like to request that on any future articles you nominate for PRODs or AFDs, that you do not mention that the article was created by Lugnuts. The identify of the editor who created an article, unless they are a sockpuppet, is really irrelevant to whether or not we should keep or delete an article. Basically, I think you can make a strong argument for deletion without drawing attention to a fellow editor.

There are many of us who worked with Lugnuts before he was blocked and while his editing was problematic, it just seems a bit mean-spirited to use his name as shorthand for an article that should be deleted. I respect the work that you do and I'm asking for this favor as a fellow editor, not an administrator who deletes a lot of PRODs and closes a lot of AFDs. For what it's worth, I think it might be appropriate to mention his participation while you are responding to other editors in AFD comments but just not in your deletion rationale, as the primary reason for an article's deletion. Thank you for considering this request. Liz Read! Talk! 01:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I certainly meant no ill will towards them and was simply attempting to provide context using a phrase I had seen others use in the past. I suppose I had not fully considered the implications of invoking their username. JTtheOG (talk) 01:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request new draft

[edit]

Will handle this page. You can help us in adding this page to Wikipedia.Draft:Ramkripalyadavge Muskang375 (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Símun Sólheim

[edit]

Why have you moved my article about a footballer into draft, refering to lack of cources. In fact there are a lot of sources, even uefa.com, wich is the most trustworthy of all sources regarding footballers. You have obviously done this by routine, and not checked the vaildy of the sources in the article. RonTho (talk) 03:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @RonTho: This was a deliberate draftification. In order to better establish notability of this footballer, you must demonstrate that there is significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Source 1 (worldfootball.net) is a database and is thus not significant coverage of the subject. Source 2 (in.fo) is a short transactional announcement and is thus not significant coverage of the subject. Source 3 (B36) is his employer and is thus not independent of the subject. I am unable to access Source 4 (faroesoccer.com), but judging by the URL it seems to be a match report, and is thus not significant coverage of the subject. I draftified your article instead of nominating for deletion in order to allow you the time to present sources that establish notability. Hope this helps and happy editing. JTtheOG (talk) 20:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You did not mention the most reliable source - uefa.com Is that not sufficient enough, regarding footballers? And what about soccerway.com?
I sincerely ask you to do a proper work, instead of what you are preforming here. RonTho (talk) 22:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RonTho: You are correct. This is not sufficient enough because stats databases do not contribute towards notability, as I mentioned in my previous comment. JTtheOG (talk) 22:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hans Werner Sokop

[edit]

Hi JTtheOG,

I've seen that you have tagged my article about Hans Werner Sokop (if this is not the case, please accept my apologies).

In the meantime, I've added a section with external links of libraries etc. that prove the literary production of Hans Werner Sokop.

Is there anything else that is necessary to prove that the content is correct and valuable?

Thanks in advance for your advice.

Uto (talk) 13:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JTtheOG,
I've added the citations and references needed, thus verifying the content of the last paragraph of the section "Life".
Therefore, I've removed the tag (also as there is no contentious and libelous content).
I hope this is OK for you.
Otherwise, please advise me what I can do to further improve the article.
Kind Regards,
Uto (talk) 09:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

[edit]

Hello JTtheOG,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Audi Crooks

[edit]

The article Audi Crooks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Audi Crooks for comments about the article, and Talk:Audi Crooks/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A question about page review

[edit]

Hello @JTtheOG,
A few days ago, I stumbled a think that I don't fully understand and I would appreciate your opinion. I have created some Wikipedia pages and all of them have received "reviewed" status. One didn't – Kurk Lietuvai. Ironically, it's the one that I happened to put the most effort in and wanted to do as good as I could. Even much newer pages that I created have already been reviewed, e.g. Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve. How come that my articles get reviewed, but one is "stuck" and doesn't? What difference on Wikipedia does it make if an article has been reviewed?

Best regards,
Frequently.by.train (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I wouldn't exactly be able to tell you, because it shows up as reviewed for me. Good work, though. JTtheOG (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Yorkshire pudding for you!

[edit]
Yorkshire Pud
Thank you for all your work on page reviews! ResonantDistortion 19:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

[edit]

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herbert Permillion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berkeley High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SusuGeo

[edit]

SusuGeo seems to have copy-pasted back all/some of the pages you moved to draft. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 14:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

let me look back it SusuGeo (talk) 14:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly recommend you utilize the Articles for creation process to create new articles. they generally give decent feedback for you to improve the article prior to it 'going live' in article space. and you especially cannot just copy the content back into the article. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 15:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the helpful feedback SusuGeo (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page mover granted

[edit]

Hello, JTtheOG. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
    is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

[edit]

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

[edit]
Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Hey man im josh submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate JTtheOG to be Editor of the Week for their ability to "crush" backlogs. They do very impressive work at NPP. Last year JTtheOG reviewed over 10,000 articles as part of new page patrolling, making this the fifth time they've done so in a single year. This also marks the (at least) seventh consecutive year that they've reviewed at least 5,000 articles. Due to this impressive and continued effort, they currently rank second all-time in article reviews. In addition, they recently won the 2024 January NPP backlog drive and the WP:FEB24 unreferenced backlog drive. I think it's time we give them some deserved recognition for the truly amazing amount of work they do. This nomination was seconded by Novem Linguae and Queen of Hearts.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: 

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
excellent new page reviewer
JTtheOG
 
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning May i, 2024
They do very impressive work at NPP. Last year JTtheOG reviewed over 10,000 articles as part of new page patrolling, making this the fifth time they have done so in a single year. It also marks the (at least) seventh consecutive year that they've reviewed a minumum of 5,000 articles. Due to this impressive and continued effort, they currently rank second all-time in article reviews. In addition, they recently won the 2024 January NPP backlog drive and the WP:FEB24 unreferenced backlog drive.
Recognized for
"crushing" backlogs at NPP
Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 12:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, thank you all so much! I'm honored that anyone would bring my (user)name up in the discussion. JTtheOG (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Greetings JG, thank you for reviewing the 1948-49 AC Milan season. Best regards.HugoAcosta9 (talk) 17:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suriname national futsal team

[edit]

Hi JTtheOG, I saw that your article on the Suriname national futsal team was put into the draft section. I have made some additions to it and the problems of the sources must be over. English is not my native language, so would you please do a last check on the text? and do a request to get it back to the main space? Thanks, regards, Ymnes (talk) 12:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

O, I see now that it is not your article. But may be you could look if it's okay for you now anyway? Thanks :-) Ymnes (talk) 12:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Frayles de Guasave logo.jpeg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frayles de Guasave logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santa Cruz Surf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Cruz County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2023 Portishead Town Council Election

[edit]

Was this draftification requested by anyone or is there an editor who has indicated they would be working on improving the draft? ~Kvng (talk) 13:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, not as far as I know. JTtheOG (talk) 21:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'd like to invoke WP:DRAFTOBJECT here. I agree with the notability concerns raised by User:Number 57 so once it is moved back to mainspace, I think it best to WP:BLAR it to North Somerset Council elections as an WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 22:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies. I missed the PROD. No problem with deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 22:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I don't like to see WP:DRAFTIFY used unless someone intends to work on the article. If it's "not ready for mainspace", it's not going to magically improve in draft space so let's delete it or find an WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 22:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Meck

[edit]

Hello, I nominated Warren Meck for deletion. You can give your opinion. GiladSeg (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skating PRODs

[edit]

Hello, JTtheOG,

It seems like you are taking issue with this glut of PRODs on junior competition skaters. If you want to see other articles tagged as PRODs, you can review User talk:Awartha since this editor created many of the articles that were tagged for deletion and you can look over User:DumbBOT/ProdSummary for upcoming PRODs. I think over the past three weeks, we've probably deleted 50 or 60 of these articles.

The only editor who has raised concerns thus far is User:Kvng who is the only editor I know of who regularly reviews the PROD list to see if the proposed deletions are appropriate. I just thought I'd pass along this information. To be honest, I'm not well-versed on WP:NSKATE which is the primary argument for the deletion of all of these articles. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Hi Liz, I appreciate you reaching out. I fear that I don't trust that this editor does any WP:BEFORE searches at all, so I've reverted all his PRODs from the past week. He predictably responded with this temper tantrum -- irresponsible to say the very least. Is there anything that can be done about that? There is no way the community can parse through sources for this many BLPs. JTtheOG (talk) 03:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for slowing this roll. I've posted elsewhere that I don't think we're equipped to responsibly review these proposals at the rate they have been arriving and I haven't been able summon any help on it so they've been rolling to deletion. There are at least a few of these currently working their way through AfD, and at this point it doesn't look to be easy to predict, just by looking at the article, which ones will be deleted. ~Kvng (talk) 13:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For my part, I think it's irresponsible to just revert PRODs when it's apparent that you've not attempted to find sources yourself. In the case of the AfD I've just run into on one, the article was created over seventeen years ago -- the community plainly has HAD time to parse through sources for it, and demonstrably doesn't give a damn. Ravenswing 00:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The burden of finding sources in deletion proposals (both prod and AfD AFAIC) is on the proposer (WP:BEFORE). The fact that an article has not been significantly worked on in x years is not a valid reason to delete it (WP:DEL-REASON). ~Kvng (talk) 13:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Klub Kosova Hamburg moved to draftspace

[edit]

Hello JTtheOG, How are you? I am new to wikipedia and am still getting used to how things work around here. I was wondering why this article was moved to draftspace. When I categorize it as a stub, isn't it okay to put it in mainspace. Also, is there anything wrong with the references I added that takes away this topic's notability? All the best,

MintyFresh201 (talk) 23:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MintyFresh201: Hi there and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm doing good and I hope that you are as well. In order to establish notability of people or organizations, you must demonstrate that there is significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. You can read more about what this means at Wikipedia:Notability. In the meantime, I draftified the article to give you or others time to come up with references from independent sources that cover the subject (in this case the club) "directly and in detail." JTtheOG (talk) 23:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I think I understand. However, how is this different than for example NKK SC, which has no references which is still in mainspace. MintyFresh201 (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well yes, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. "Plenty of articles exist that probably should not. Equally, because articles must wait for someone who is interested in the subject to notice they are missing before they are created, a lot of articles do not exist that probably should. So just pointing out that an article on a similar subject exists does not prove that the article in question should also exist; it is quite possible that the other article should also be deleted but nobody has noticed it and listed it for deletion yet." You are welcome to nominate NKK SC for deletion, but I am highly doubtful that sources do not exist considering the club played in the top-flight Japan Soccer League for almost three decades. JTtheOG (talk) 00:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're right, thanks for clarifying. MintyFresh201 (talk) 00:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DavidLofgren1996

[edit]

I don't think it's a good idea to pursue inquiries on their talkpage - they talked themselves into an indefinite block at AN by making egregious personal attacks, and it's really not appropriate or kind to them under the circumstances to use their talkpage for general inquiries or discussion. Acroterion (talk) 19:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reasonable enough. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 19:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Category:Canoeists by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Canoeists by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Curlers by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Curlers by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fencers by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Fencers by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Figure skaters by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Figure skaters by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Golfers by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Golfers by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gymnasts by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Gymnasts by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Handball players by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Handball players by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ice hockey people by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Ice hockey people by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Racing drivers by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Racing drivers by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sport shooters by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Sport shooters by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:03, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Speed skaters by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Speed skaters by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Water polo players by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Water polo players by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sport wrestlers by city or town has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Sport wrestlers by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Progress Chapter Two: The March Of Progress deletion nomination

[edit]

Hello, thank you for reviewing the Progress Chapter Two: The March Of Progress article. However, I noticed some other user tagged it with a deletion nomination. Which decision has priority in this case? Your review or his tag? I suppose I'm not allowed to remove his tag until a potential discussion is over. The thing is that it might never occur and the article might get deleted senselessly. I just started the Progress Chapters project as they must be categorized, documented and sorted out. What can be done in order for the article to be kept on the mainspace? Thanks! JeyReydar97 (talk) 21:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If other editors decide that it doesn't meet the notability guidelines, I'm afraid there is nothing that can be done to keep it in the mainspace. You could argue for the article to be draftified in order to not lose your work and allow you to find more sources to show notability. JTtheOG (talk) 21:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bataconcica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Locality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

[edit]
The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia   
This award is given in recognition to JTtheOG for accumulating at least 500 points during the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

[edit]

Unnecessarily complicated Gears Award

This award is given in recognition to JTtheOG for accumulating at least 150 points during each week of the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


May 2024 NPP backlog drive – Re-reviews award

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
This award is given to JTtheOG for doing over 25 re-reviews, in the May 2024 NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

For your effort in patrolling and reviewing new film articles! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 14:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JTtheOG! Thanks for reviewing my articles over the past few months. I have just been granted autopatrolled rights, so hopefully you will not come across my articles again while patrolling new pages. Here is a barnstar for your contributions in reviewing new film articles. Keep up the great work!! — Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 14:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

Thank you for reviewing Noa Cochva so quickly. I created 2 pages a while ago via AFC and they're both still awaiting review, would you mind taking a look at them? Draft:Rivka Bayech is pretty straight forward. Then there's Draft:Logan_Levkoff that was originally created and deleted over 10 years ago or something like that so it's a bit more complicated. MaskedSinger (talk) 19:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aimee Aikenhead

[edit]

You've nominated the aforementioned page I created for deletion but I don't understand why. It ha sources including BBC, Jersey Evening Post and ESPNcricinfo and links to several other pages on Wikipedia. I also don't understand how to fight my case. Shrug02 (talk) 22:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shrug02: Hello there. Biographies of living people require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Both BBC articles have exactly one mention of her while the Evening Post seems to have three sentences covering her. I hope you can see how this is not enough in-depth coverage to warrant a stand-alone article. JTtheOG (talk) 23:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are dozens of pages I've seen with one source and one fact on like Joe Blogs went to the Olympics for Tunisia in 2016 etc. I appreciate this subject does not have huge amounts of coverage but it is more than those sort of articles plus the subject is likely to increase in notability bearing in mind how young she is and how much more international cricket she is likely to play. Shrug02 (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. "Plenty of articles exist that probably should not. Equally, because articles must wait for someone who is interested in the subject to notice they are missing before they are created, a lot of articles do not exist that probably should. So just pointing out that an article on a similar subject exists does not prove that the article in question should also exist; it is quite possible that the other article should also be deleted but nobody has noticed it and listed it for deletion yet." You are welcome to nominate those for deletion. If Aikenhead becomes notable in the future, you will have access to the article history in order to recreate the page. Until then, unless you can present better sources, it is up to the discretion of the discussion. JTtheOG (talk) 23:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have added further content and citations since you asked for its deletion. But I give up. I was trying to make a full set of pages for all the Jersey women's national cricket team that have done anything but I'll abandon it. Shrug02 (talk) 23:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Da Rocha

[edit]

I don't understand the message regarding this page. This has all gone from being a fun and, I thought, helpful activity to being some sort of online battle. I'm jacking it all in. I've created 60 plus pages and done 2000 plus edits all in good faith in the last three months but I don't need the hassle. Shrug02 (talk) 23:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shrug02: The message is the same as for the last article. I am unable to find enough coverage that covers the subject directly and in-depth, as is required of all biographies. JTtheOG (talk) 23:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Delete it and all the rest of my project. Shrug02 (talk) 23:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not have that ability. It is up for a community discussion. JTtheOG (talk) 23:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure the discussion will go your way as you are the authority figure and I am a nobody. I just don't get it. I can't even find where to object to this deleting. You had no problems with my earlier Jersey Cricket articles but now there's an issue when I'm using the same sources. Shrug02 (talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am no more an authority figure than you are. I am just a nobody on the internet. You are encouraged to contribute to the discussion here, as you already have. If you are referring to Sally Barton, she has clearly received multiple pieces of in-depth coverage, which are missing from both Aikenhead and Da Rocha's articles. JTtheOG (talk) 23:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not referring to Sally Barton. I am referring to the half a dozen Jersey player articles that were reviewed and approved today. Shrug02 (talk) 23:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe I was involved in reviewing those. JTtheOG (talk) 23:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i have no idea who reviewed them but no doubt you intend to seek them out and have them deleted too. You have approved many of my previous articles over the last 3 months. Also I can't find the discussion page for Da Rocha Shrug02 (talk) 23:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, once again, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument to keep this article. There is, as you have acknowledged, a serious lack of sourcing. The Da Rocha discussion can be found here. JTtheOG (talk) 23:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sovenfire3982 Page Reviews

[edit]

Hey there JTtheOG! I'd love to thank you for reviewing multiple new pages of mine (Queen Degenerate, Girlie Pop, etc.) If you don't have too much on your plate, could I possibly ask you to review two of my new ones that are stuck in the queue? Drew Louis & Heatwave (Bronze Avery album). No worries if you have too much on your plate- just thought I'd ask. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sovenfire3982 (talk • contribs) 01:47, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! Sovenfire3982 (talk) 02:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

[edit]

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Wikipedia.
    Check the guidelines before you start.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar
Thank you for reviewing most of my wrestling-related created articles. Best wishes to you!

JeyReydar97 (talk) 20:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you please help me?

[edit]

Hello, I hope all is well. Could you take a look at an article I created - The Country Club of Farmington, 1892-1995? Do you have any suggestions? JoeK2033 (talk) 20:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there; nice work. My immediate suggestion would be to take a look at WP:OVERLINK and WP:LINKONCE. JTtheOG (talk) 20:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New article - Bahishkarana

[edit]

Hi

I have worked on this new article Bahishkarana.

Request you to look into this and suggest how I can make it better. This is a new Telugu web series. Filmy World (talk) 17:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cookie Brinkman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 21:07, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald C. Carlson (July 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, JTtheOG! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald C. Carlson has been accepted

[edit]
Donald C. Carlson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pages Reviewed Request

[edit]

Hello, can you review the article I wrote this: The Haunted House Special: The Vampire of Light and the Child of Darkness? Do you think my article was okay? Shockingman173223 (talk) 15:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I forgot to tell you, here: The Haunted House season 1 Shockingman173223 (talk) 05:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The article Cookie Brinkman you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cookie Brinkman and Talk:Cookie Brinkman/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 19:24, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

[edit]

Thank you very much for reviewing my page on the Timurnama so quickly. Much appreciated!

WatkynBassett (talk) 20:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The article Cookie Brinkman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cookie Brinkman for comments about the article, and Talk:Cookie Brinkman/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 23:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles reviewed request

[edit]

Hi again, can you review this page please? here: The Haunted House Special: Joseon Exorcism Annals Shockingman173223 (talk) 08:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fatmir Prengaj for deletion

[edit]

Proposed deletion of Fatmir Prengaj

[edit]
Notice

The article Fatmir Prengaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

failure to meet WP:GNG. Couldn't find notable coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UncleTupelo1 (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gonzalo González (footballer, born 1995) for deletion

[edit]

Proposed deletion of Gonzalo González (footballer, born 1995)

[edit]
Notice

The article Gonzalo González (footballer, born 1995) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet WP:GNG. Sources no longer maintained

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UncleTupelo1 (talk) 13:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mirko Tomianovic

[edit]
Notice

The article Mirko Tomianovic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Dead links on sources and Soccerway used as source

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • TBD

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Review request

[edit]

Can you reviewed this article already? here: Goblin Hill. Shockingman173223 (talk) 10:57, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Getting removed by some user

[edit]

Hello, I recently spent a lot of time adding the official olympic circle symbol into the infoboxes of various recently crowned olympic medalists. However there is a certain user who keeps reverting them without giving me a palpable explanation of why he's doing it. For example, take the article of Julien Alfred. If you have time, please check the article's talk page, you will see there what I mean. Tell me what you think about this aspect. Thanks a lot! JeyReydar97 (talk) 20:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

[edit]
From, BloxyColaSweet
From, BloxyColaSweet

BloxyColaSweet (talk) 02:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2018–19 Point Loma Nazarene Sea Lions men's basketball team

[edit]

The article 2018–19 Point Loma Nazarene Sea Lions men's basketball team you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2018–19 Point Loma Nazarene Sea Lions men's basketball team for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 10:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

[edit]

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Derrick Anderson (Politician)

[edit]

Hi there please don't delete it he's a lawyer and US Military Officer, thank you. Fredwebb17 (talk) 04:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fredwebb17: Hi there. Thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, politicians need to be elected to at least a state-wide office to warrant their own Wikipedia page. Anderson has not yet been elected to office. A workaround is by meeting the general notability guidelines, but that requires significant in-depth coverage of the subject from multiple independent sources. The first two sources are a couple mentions and quotes (not in-depth) and the last two are from Georgetown and the military, both of which he has an affiliation with (not independent). JTtheOG (talk) 06:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brandon Prichard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Above the Law.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Derrick Anderson (politician)

[edit]

Hi there I'm sorry but please enlighten me I'm just a new editor but why is it not allowed? Joe Kent is also political candidate and former green Beret same as Anderson but he has one? Please tell me what can I do to fix it, Thank you. Fredwebb17 (talk) 17:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, @Fredwebb17:. Welcome to Wikipedia. As I stated in my last reply to you, biographies must meet the general notability guidelines, which require significant in-depth coverage of the subject from multiple independent sources. Joe Kent is a fairly notable figure in national politics, and this is reflected in the fact that there is in fact significant in-depth coverage of him in multiple independent sources. The second one I clicked, this piece from Mother Jones, is probably 2 or 3 thousand words dedicated exclusively to Mr. Kent. Probably close to 2,000 words in this piece from The Seattle Times, also solely about him. Safe to say he meets the GNG. Anderson's article, on the other hand, has exactly three independent sources: this piece from InsideNoVa with a half-dozen sentences of coverage about him, this piece from CBS News which is mostly quotes from him, and this piece from Fox News about Trump endorsing him with another half-dozen sentences specifically about him. The coverage that has been shown of these two are not comparable at the moment.
P.S. There is also a community consensus that Fox News is generally an unreliable source, particularly in the topic areas of politics and science (see WP:FOXNEWSPOLITICS). JTtheOG (talk) 19:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Bacerac Municipality

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Bacerac Municipality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 07:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

[edit]
The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia   
This award is given in recognition to JTtheOG for accumulating at least 500 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

[edit]

Unnecessarily complicated Gears Award

This award is given in recognition to JTtheOG for accumulating at least 150 points during each week of the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Re-reviews award

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
This award is given to JTtheOG for doing over 25 re-reviews, in the September 2024 NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your prompt review of the page Mark Monmonier bibliography I created. I can see that you do a lot of good work on New Page Patrol, so thank you for contributing to Wikipedia overall. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 01:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Juliet

[edit]

Thanks for the quick review. I need help linking to Dutch language article on same topic at Juliet (televisieserie)].Didier Landner (talk) 04:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Solved it, ignore request.Didier Landner (talk) 20:49, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fungi of Tajikistan

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Fungi of Tajikistan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fungi of Kyrgyzstan

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Fungi of Kyrgyzstan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fungi of Uzbekistan

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Fungi of Uzbekistan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome JTtheOG! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 12:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

[edit]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Canada Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and Christmas Island AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JTtheOG&oldid=1254748702"