User talk:SafariScribe

SafariScribe is currently experiencing significant stress that may affect their ability to work on Wikipedia. They may choose to work in quieter areas and avoid complicated tasks or areas prone to conflict. They may also respond to talk page or email messages more slowly than usual, and your patience is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

The world was created for all.
No one is perfect even AI's do mis fault. Stay cool, just alert me and I will see it off!
— SafariScribe

If you are here just to castigated me (I know there shouldn't be "d", so it's a mistake; fix it yourself), please don't come here. Find anywhere in your talk page, then ping me for opinion. Welcome to my talk page, and ask questions as you will answer when it's thrown to you. I have no other account and have never edited for any payment whatsoever.

Draft:Daniel Vorcaro

A month ago we talked about an article I wrote. I am a paid contributor. I'm trying to follow all the guidelines and you helped me with that. I added some part to make it more impartial, talking about criticism. This article has already been previously approved by @Qcne. Can you check and see if you can exit drafts again?

Is YouTube a source?

Hi SafariScribe, sorry to bother you, but I just wanted to ask, is YouTube a reliable source? Because I see it all over articles (especially music-related ones), and there's a whole template for it and everything. I also observed that for my King of Love article, the citation for Instagram was removed. I guess I kind of see why but I was just curious and wanted to double-check if YouTube was reliable. Cheers! OsigbemheEJB (talk) 03:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check WP:RSPYT. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Planning request

Hello SafariScribe. Do you have time to review an edit request I posted on the Creative Planning Talk page? You helped me with my previous request about updating the infobox so I thought you might be interested in the topic. No worries if you're busy, though! CreativePlanningAngela (talk) 14:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for not responding on time. Vanderwaaalforces seems to have....done the needful. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Vanderwaalforces was very helpful. Genuinely appreciate the assistance I've received so far from Wikipedia editors. CreativePlanningAngela (talk) 18:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for loving Wikipedia and her editors; don't forget you're one by all virtue. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links on Kraków Gate in Lublin page

Hello SafariScribe, could you please point out the external link issue on the Kraków Gate in Lublin page? I browsed the guidelines again, and nothing is clicking. There is one external link on the page, in the references, and it is a reliable source, I think, for the heritage designation alone. That is all it is used for currently. Please respond if it is convenient, and thanks for your help with the page. OldPolandUpdates (talk) 14:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't tag anything, please check the log. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I checked the history and an external links template was added here [1] by SafariScribe possibly in error I have removed it. Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry @OldPolandUpdates, that should have been "uncategorized" tag. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question about my AfC submission: Draft:Fuller GT Magnet Elementary

Hi. I recently have made a AfC submission that you recently declined- you left a reason that the school is not notable. I have heavily revamped and found references and added them to the text- Do you have any comment on what specifically needs to be added to the article and also what you think of what I recently added? Thanks, ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 18:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't have, thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 15:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pietro Sfair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lebanese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Albania

I think the consensus was to restore Kingdom of Albania (medieval), not make it the primary topic over the Zogist state. Srnec (talk) 21:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done thanks! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections in the article by Willfried Segebrecht

Hi SafariScribe, I have corrected the article according to your recommendations that we wrote about in the message, please check it if it is correct now. As I wrote earlier, I have written permission from the author of the website to use information from the website that I use as a reliable source. Please check, I hope that with your help the project will be accepted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Willfried_Segebrecht Best regards Grzegorz Gordonwg (talk) 09:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SafariScribe, please check my article, I have improved it according to your recommendations. Gordonwg (talk) 03:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
716	Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami (talk)	Add sources
39	Raul Manglapus (talk)	Add sources
110	Al-Badr (East Pakistan) (talk)	Add sources
162	Ghulam Azam (talk)	Add sources
21	2013 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence (talk)	Add sources
5	St Nicolas Church, Pevensey (talk)	Add sources
46	Ateneo de Naga University (talk)	Cleanup
298	Ateneo de Manila University (talk)	Cleanup
50	Emotional prosody (talk)	Cleanup
134	International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) (talk)	Expand
43	Újpest (talk)	Expand
20	Hajógyári Island (talk)	Expand
155	Soundscape (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19	Ateneo de Iloilo (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19	National Theatre (Budapest) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
48	Certified teacher (talk)	Merge
566	Chaldean Catholic Church (talk)	Merge
10	Searchlight (album) (talk)	Merge
86	Speech perception (talk)	Wikify
165	Sound localization (talk)	Wikify
47	Ferencváros (talk)	Wikify
8	Les inqualifiables (talk)	Orphan
6	Louis Carreon (talk)	Orphan
3	Mohamed Chrif Tribak (talk)	Orphan
10	Shahid (Algeria) (talk)	Stub
44	Kwassa kwassa (talk)	Stub
6	Abdul Khaleque Mondal (talk)	Stub
31	Mohammad Tajul Islam (talk)	Stub
3	Rose Shahfa (talk)	Stub
29	Daily Naya Diganta (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance for the Draft: Beadle Family Massacre (1782)

yo, earlier today you declined the submission of my article Draft: Beadle Family Massacre (1782) on the grounds of "references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published" I would like to ask you for some assistance on improving my article. Bdblakley29 (talk) 15:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read HELP:YFA. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you SO much for your help and skill

Thank you SO much, Safari Scribe, for reviewing my first article: Amikam Toren. I really appreciate you taking the time to do this. Also thank you for cleaning up - and improving - some of the text, and the technical edits you did. It's so great that experienced user's, like yourself, are helping beginners, like me. All the very best x 2025Newbie (talk) 11:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy too. Thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need advise regarding translated page

Hello! I need some advise on the following page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Urban_Diary_(Hong_Kong)

which is a translation of the Wiki_zh page: https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/%E5%9F%8E%E5%B8%82%E6%97%A5%E8%A8%98

It has been declined twice for citation issue, but I have checked the sources and they are from well known news sources and official (government) sources. I wonder what is wrong with them. Thank you. Arutoria (talk) 12:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia (s) of every language varies by their policy, e.t.c. That an article was accepted in its Chinese version doesn't mean it would, in English. YouTube is not a reliable source, and seeing your draft, it doesn't appear to meet WP:NORG. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted.

What a shame. I was planning to bring some niche pages from ZH to EN.

Looks like the plan is on hold now. Arutoria (talk) 14:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, if there are good articles that meets WP:GNG, you can easily translate them from any language to here. Don't be discouraged my dear. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:04, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Opera Orlando

Hey SafariScribe, I hope you are having a great day. I recently submitted an article for publication and wanted to follow up. I had been advised by Memer15151 that using the company website as a source was appropriate, and they confirmed that it would be considered reliable. However, I the article isn't published. Could you kindly advise me on the best course of action moving forward? Thank you for your time and assistance. Bluebox57 (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please link the draft. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Opera Orlando - Wikipedia Bluebox57 (talk) 21:37, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CNMall41's comment needs to be addressed, and it says: At the moment, the majority of the content in the draft is not supported by a reliable source. The information needs to be removed or sourced. See WP:INCITE which will also assist. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:01, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Rocky Reach AVA

Did you notice the PD-notice for the Federal Register references? I am aware of Wiki's copyright rules, but the Federal Register is public domain as notated and available for publishing its Wikipedia article.

From Federal Register site. "§ 2.6 Unrestricted use. Any person may reproduce or republish, without restriction, any material appearing in any regular or special edition of the Federal Register." Fb2002 (talk) 22:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please link the draft. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2024)

Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is:

Stationery

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Slow living • Space Age

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Advice on draft: Mary Beth Goodman bio

Hello there, as a new author who seemingly took on a bigger challenge than expected in drafting a living person’s bio, I would appreciate your advice.

What can I do to get this draft bio of Mary Beth Goodman ready for publication? You recently rejected it and in response I asked questions on the draft’s talk page about alternative sources and why the existing sources are insufficient. Perhaps you can give me more detailed feedback?

The person being profiled has mostly been a diplomat or civil servant so the sources to substantiate her bio are not diverse: they are government sources or other organizations citing the government ones—but it seems editors don’t find those credible. I don’t know how to proceed.

Your help is appreciated. 🙏 Lfdigests (talk) 20:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will look over, and get back to you. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir/ma'am! Lfdigests (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Your submission at Articles for creation: Orville Peck bibliography : November 11. 2024

Dear SafariScribe: although you are an experienced wiki-editor, you misunderstand what constitutes reliable sources. The bibliography article about South African singer Orville Peck comprises citations from the most reliable databases: Scopus, EBSCO and ProQuest. I respectfully ask you to rescind your denial, and approve the bibliography article about Orville Peck. Please note, that there is a separate article about this singer Orville Peck. The criteria for approving Bibliographic articles are different from the criteria for regular articles. PLease see another biblio article, that I worked on before: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mearsheimer_bibliography . This should give you an example how bibliographic articles are different from regular articles. If you think, that "articles about" -unlike 'articles by"- do not belong to biblio-articles, you need to specify the exact wiki-policy, that state this. As far as I can see, you were wrong in making this distinction. If you understand my arguments, please approve my biblio-article about this amazing South African singer. Walter Tau (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Walter Tau, and welcome to my talk page. Unfortunately, I regret to say, "I am not going to accept that draft". Why? Its still a big mess, and most of the contents there aren't verifiable or would likely make a reader interested. To crown it all, another prominent editor has dropped a very important aspect of Wikipedia's "do not", where your draft applies. It is "Wikipedia is not a directory and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. If people want to know about him or works written about him, they can still browse those sources you've provided there. Thanks for your hardwork though. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prue Bird Article

I am very surprised that it was flagged for not worthy of a Wikipedia article when it's a very high profile case in Australia. My links prove that it was covered extensively in the Melbourne News. So I'm very surprised that was flagged. And considering I just reported on the murder of a teenage girl 30 years ago, I am surprised that it could be flagged as not neutral. A website that has long articles about silly memes for this to be flagged as not credible enough seems very surprising and hurtful. And I think I deserve a second chance before I change it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Prue_Bird_Disappearance 365scarlet (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and welcome. Try reading HELP:YFA. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Elayne Shapiro review

I really appreciate the quick review! The academic notability source was exactly what I needed, I'm sorry I didn't find it first. Still learning the ropes here, so I appreciate the clear guidance. I'll dig around a bit more to see if there's enough independent coverage to meet the requirements, and if not, try my hand somewhere else. Any other advice is welcome. Grepless (talk) 19:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Please try reading very very well, WP:NACADEMIC. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jayden Luker

Sorry but his was a bad mainspace move. He does not meet GNG. Giant Snowman 19:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Thank you. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 04:22:53, 14 November 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Postcinematicbodies

Postcinematicbodies (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Trust (German organization) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Draft article declined: This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article.

I noticed a key link broken so I updated - covers the organization in a paragraph and footnote. Also added award.

There several interviews (both primary and secondary) that mention the organization in several paragraphs. I saw on another article: "interviews are not inherently unreliable and can present a mix of independent secondary coverage and own statements, and all statements are verifiable consistent with WP:V and WP:RS"

Curious your thoughts on which sources are needed.

Had used wiki article as a guide for sourcing and can't tell how the sources are substantially different: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Segal

Thank you very much. Postcinematicbodies (talk) 04:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and welcome to Wikipedia. Sources should be reliable and may include newspapers and magazines (notable national and international), peer reviewed journals, e.t.c. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:44, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you!

I fixed a broken link to a peer review journal that covers the organization in a paragraph and a footnote and added a link to an award I found. I'm curious if this would help with the notability issues and I should resubmit or if I should continue collecting references?

In terms of in depth coverage - there's one peer reviewed journal, a leading digital arts magazine and a leading European fashion magazine in addition to a government award. Postcinematicbodies (talk) 15:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jorge Kurchan

Accpeting Draft:Jorge Kurchan? What were you thinking? Fram (talk) 08:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! You've draftified it. There is no problem. Thank you for this type of correction; it helps me alot. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is a problem, in that you are still making such basic errors. Fram (talk) 10:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Test edit speedy on User:SmartFootballNerd/sandbox

Hi SafariScribe -- I've declined this as test edits are permitted or even encouraged in userspace; G2 explicitly does not apply to this space. More generally, using speedy with "unspecified reason" is usually not the correct move; if it doesn't fit into one of the established categories then speedy is generally not appropriate. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 17:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soroush Saghafian

Hi there, can you explain your reasoning for declining this one as not meeting WP:NPROF? I wouldn't say I'm 100% confident it can't be deleted at AfD, but he certainly meets my "good enough for AfD to have a go at it" bar. -- asilvering (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:44:05, 15 November 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Facbgc

Facbgc (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Hugh Owen Medal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your time and comments on my Draft:Hugh_Owen_Medal article. I wanted to better understand the issues with reliability of sources for this national research medal. I have attempted to identify appropriate secondary sources, as it will largely be university/institutional news releases that will independently announce the annual award winners (alongside the Learned Society of Wales' own announcements). Would these not count as quality/reliable/independent secondary sources? I have also attempted to identify other independent sources, such as the British Educational Research Association, as well as from Senedd Cymru, the Welsh Parliament (national legislature).

(I have also just updated the draft article with 2024 Medal winner, as well as some general tidying)

Facbgc (talk) 11:44, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Facbgc, you're doing great with the writing, however the draft doesn't meet WP:NAWARDS. The sources were a bit funny and from a look, they don't meet WP:SIGCOV. Source 1 is verifiable especially with giving information about the award, but because it is a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE, we couldn't use it to determine notability. The bbc article was all about "Dillwyn Medal", and fails to verify anything to where it was used as a source. The article from 'bera.ac.uk' is likely a paid publication, otherwise advert. Without leaning much on above, the YouTube links should be removed as they aren't reliable. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft page of Register.BG publication denial.

Hi SafariScribe.

Thank you for reviewing my page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Register.BG

Unfortunately I did not understand why exactly the publication was denied. I would like to ask for help publishing my article about "Register.BG". Can you please share your opinion what we can do to have this page published? The company "Register.BG" is popular in Bulgaria and it is the top level domain registry in the country. The company has its roots from the late 1980s and it has a rich history in contribution of the development the internet society. I added all possible references that I found online, however the page publication was denied. Some of the sources are very credible including the ones from ICANN - which is a well known non-profit organization selected by the US government to manage and develop the internet zone. Can you please give me an advice what else i can do to have this page accepted.

Kind Regards! Nick Nickpetersen2023 (talk) 15:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nickpetersen2023, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for the patience of waiting for my reply; I was indeed very very busy. Your draft doesn't appear to meet WP:NCORP. Although I have this feeling that it may be notable since it operates the Bulgarian National Internet Domain Registry, I also see the blatant lack of WP:SIGCOV perhaps sources doesn't equal WP:SIRS. Sources, as you should know, helps us in determining notablity, and I wonder why you would count these unreliable sources otherwise database entries as WP:RS: ruskov-law.eu, help.superhosting.bg, www.icann.org, e.t.c. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer.

I tried to find more information about the company.

Can you please take a look the following references and tell me if they are acceptable:

Position 1: "Register.BG - Registration and use of domain names at ccTLD registry"

Position 10: "Bulgaria Internet Company Launches Domain Names in Cyrillic - Novinite.com - Sofia News Agency".

Best Regards,

Nick Nickpetersen2023 (talk) 14:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
608	2011 Egyptian revolution (talk)	Add sources
9	Newton, New Zealand (talk)	Add sources
6	Balmoral, New Zealand (talk)	Add sources
42	Queen Street, Auckland (talk)	Add sources
10	Saint Marys Bay, New Zealand (talk)	Add sources
24	Downtown Victoria (talk)	Add sources
5	Trials and judicial hearings following the Egyptian revolution of 2011 (talk)	Cleanup
170	2012 Egyptian presidential election (talk)	Cleanup
21	Woolston, New Zealand (talk)	Cleanup
28	Afer echinatus (talk)	Expand
12	Timeline of the Egyptian Crisis under the SCAF (talk)	Expand
7	Human rights in Egypt under the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (talk)	Expand
243	Viral marketing (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
281	Anthem of the Sun (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
65	Cuban Liberation Army (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
5	Maymorning (talk)	Merge
25	Demographic history of the Vilnius region (talk)	Merge
23	Saranga Dariya (talk)	Merge
35	2012–2013 Egyptian protests (talk)	Wikify
8	Edouard Machery (talk)	Wikify
7	William Dale Phillips (talk)	Wikify
2	Rosemary Kerwegi (talk)	Orphan
12	Shatsi Musherure Kutesa (talk)	Orphan
2	Sarah Kiyingi Musoke (talk)	Orphan
5	Al-Badeel (talk)	Stub
13	5-Benzyloxytryptamine (talk)	Stub
16	5-Carboxamidotryptamine (talk)	Stub
7	Mała Wierzyca (talk)	Stub
12	National Police Day (Egypt) (talk)	Stub
27	8-OH-DPAT (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:32:03, 16 November 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Mabnola

Mabnola (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Michael A. Preston Four Ball Rally of 1984 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't think I understand the reason my article was rejected. Throughout the article, I linked news articles from across the country about the event. Can you please help me by being more specific about what sources are not acceptable?

Mabnola (talk) 16:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and welcome. I don't know how you had expected an editor to know that this source from NY Times was really about the event, because it used "a clandestine coast-to-coast race in record time." Therefore another source should be placed to confirm your content. The 11th source is a book with low bibliographical details. Following the need for WP:OFFLINESOURCES, it would be appreciative to include the page numbers in the book where you got your information. Reviewing the newspaper archive, I saw that you failed to include a clipping of the particular headline as was seen in "The Journal 5 June 1984 — The NYS Historic Newspapers". Also, there was same problem with the overused source "NewspaperArchive 1700s - 2024 | NewspaperArchive". Having this little coverage doesn't impress our rule for WP:NEVENT and WP:SIGCOV. Events can exist but they may not be notable for a standalone article. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:28:43, 16 November 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Frans van Zandvoort

Frans van Zandvoort (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Noord Nederlandsche P&I Club (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SafariScribe,

You recently rejected the page I made, which I'll link here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Noord_Nederlandsche_P%26I_Club

It was declined earlier on account of an overabundance of references that weren't of solid enough quality -- so I weeded out the weak ones until only the better remained. I also took care to write the article in a neutral tone of voice, without any "peacock language". I believe the article speaks for itself in how factual it is.

Just to be clear on my position here: I've creating this page as a professional assignment by the company NNPC itself. Despite this, I understand and support the nature of Wikipedia!

If you could clarify for me what exactly it is that made you decline the page and how I could improve it for publication, I'd be very grateful. Thanks for taking the time to help!

Best wishes, Roderick Frans van Zandvoort (talk) 18:28, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would get back to this. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:22:14, 18 November 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Ecbmlc

Ecbmlc (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Salima Suswell (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, hope you are well. I appreciate your edits on this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Salima_Suswell You left me this comment: Merge important details into Black Muslim Leadership Council.

Can you confirm that you mean you want me to fully merge the Salima Suswell page onto the BMLC page, instead of having a standalone Salima Suswell page? Thank you for your time.

Ecbmlc (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending thoughts. I will check the possibility. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

	Greetings, SafariScribe. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: Gerda Arendt
Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow. To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

Tol Bot (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kate Abdo

Hi, thank you for acting as closer in this discussion.

I urge you to reopen the discussion, as this title is a clear violation of the policy at WP:NAMECHANGES. Recent secondary source articles all use "Kate Scott"[2] and her blue-check Insta is @katescott. See also WP:SPNC. 162 etc. (talk) 22:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@162 etc., thank you for the messages. My closure equally matches the obvious consensus of that discussion. Since you didn't vote, you may want to open a new RM. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment here makes me curious, are you aware of WP:RMNOMIN?

If no one has objected, go ahead and perform the move as requested unless it is out of keeping with naming conventions or is otherwise in conflict with applicable guidelines or policy. Further, any move request that is out of keeping with naming conventions or is otherwise in conflict with applicable guideline and policy, unless there is a very good reason to ignore rules, should be closed without moving regardless of how many of the participants support it. (emphasis mine)

I'm as yet undecided on whether or not this particular RM should have been closed as moved or not, but the fact that you did not attempt to question the alleged violation of policy, while justifying your closure of the move on the basis of consensus, makes it unclear if you are aware of this particular aspect of closing RMs. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 14:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual recent RM closes

You recently closed Talk:Chuck Smith (sprinter) and other RMs concerning WP:NCSP as "WP:SNOW close per 2 !vote consensus." This seems odd, as the closes were not early (all 7 days after being posted), the "2 !vote[s]" includes the nominator, and I believe SNOW would not apply with so few !votes. In fact, you could have closed that as uncontested technical requests (WP:RMNOMIN), which is quite different from SNOW. Alternatively, you could have just closed them as "moved," which perhaps would have been the best option. Sorry in advance if there's something I'm missing here. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 13:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @JJPMaster, and thank you for your concerns. I expressed cautious care while moving this pages as WP:SNOW since it's obviously going to be moved. We do that sometimes, but not always, to save the community's time. That may be what you are missing hahah.Thanks though. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aziz Ullah Khan Article

Hello! I was surprised you Rejected And they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources. He is an elected Chairman, hence, notable per This also applies to persons who have Verified Media Coverage. 103.82.253.30 (talk) 14:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. Could you link the draft here? Also, a chairman is likely going to fail WP:NPOL. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for correction it's Mayor like Mpa's https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aziz_Ullah_Khan_Marwat 103.82.253.30 (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Xxps" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Xxps has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 20 § Xxps until a consensus is reached. 65.92.246.77 (talk) 18:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is an edit request at Talk:Hamis Kiggundu

I believe it may be valid to accept, but wish neither to accept nor decline this on. I have left a comment. Since you edited it so tightly I thought you might wish to consider it 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November thanks

Thank you for improving articles in November! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]