User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 8

Archive

hi hi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Afsheen_(musician)

Hi Safari. You were the last one to decline by draft, but I do not agree with your decision. I had multiple independent sources there. I did no have a section for discography, so it was hard for you to understand and navigate it, but I had sources for it included in the article. I believe you should review all the sources, and you can see most of those were added upon your review. I do not think my article is any different from this article you reviewer above Ryan Trey.

I had a long discussion about it, some editor was complaining that I even get paid out of the blue. An editors helped me fix the issues with the draft and i made an entire new section. You can see yourself, I made about 3 articles in total, one deleted or not, I am not sure. I need a presentation about articles I made for school. I wrote about topics, or people whose work I know. I do not know what another article to make if this will be deleted. It takes time to find information. If you have time, do you think you can review it? I am not saying my article is more important than any.

I was thinking maybe i should finds a city to make an article about or some small village, so that would have 100% chance to be accepted. Or maybe can you suggest an underrepresented subject? J2009j (talk) 20:53, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

You've resubmitted right? I will check it later. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I re-submitted it, so please, take a look, I had those sources there, and added explanations in new section Discography, so you can see. J2009j (talk) 16:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

@J2009j, sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 aren't reliable. I think you need to read WP:RS and cite national newspapers/articles/magazines with a Wikipedia page. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

I tried to add all available on google. There are radios and charts. I do not know what category it fits. I added a discography section, like an editor told me, from the website of the national radio. I believe he also meets the WP:COMPOSER. He composed many songs, and some of those have separate pages on wikipedia. J2009j (talk) 18:51, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Nothing about the age or birthday is online, so I did not add it, because I do not know. Hope that is fine. J2009j (talk) 18:52, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

I will be waiting for your review. I believe the sources there are sufficient, i just had a wrong structure so you did not see. What do you think? I read about WP:COMPOSER too. J2009j (talk) 15:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

I will help you restructure and remove unreliable sources. Is that ok for you? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:45, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

@SafariScribe you can suggest, I don't mind. But those sourse provide important background information. For example, for the section about education. I agree with the comment of @Mr.choppers if the source if not false, then why should I remove it? For example you said source 1 is nor reliable. It is the official web site of the artist. Almost all pages of famous people include their official websites for general information.

source number 3 -the Festival Voice. An online news outlet. It does not contain any paid or promo notes. Based on your writing, it looks like it should only be articles at the new york times, or time magazine suitable for wikipedia. It is not true, many articles do not have publication at the new york times.

Or source 4 for example: https://atwoodmagazine.com/afsheen-interview-2021-music-happy-tunes/

An article, contains some elements of interviews and a summary of his work. Why is it nor "reliable". It does not say it is paid or is an ad. Provides important information about his music. J2009j (talk) 04:38, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

It would be good to clarify, because I am actually confused. 🫠 J2009j (talk) 15:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Dear @SafariScribe , what do you think about this? Does it make sense what I say based on the rules you know? J2009j (talk) 01:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

I also just checked. Source 5- it is a webpage of the Recording label. It is an old site, but it is not false information. It is a website of an old recording label in New York. with the bio of the person. So, yeah, I am confused. Would appreciate your opinion and thank you for taking time for this. J2009j (talk) 18:03, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I also want to add that multiple songs he composed have their own wikipedia pages. I think it meets WP:COMPOSER , otherwise I am genuinely confused. J2009j (talk) 18:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello friend, @J2009j

I noticed that you used an article I created as a reference in your argument. While I appreciate your engagement, I don't think it was necessary. I don't mean to trespass or cause any disagreement.

May I assist in restructuring the draft? I don't mind taking the time to contribute a bit. I believe that with input from other editors, we can help improve the draft together. would you like any more adjustments?

@SafariScribe @Mr.choppers

Thank you! Afro 📢Talk! 17:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate it. But I think structure is fine. I used your article as an example, and I think it is necessary.

For example there are sources like 4 "Ryan Trey Songs, Albums, Reviews, Bio & More |..." AllMusic. Retrieved July 29, 2024. or P, Milca (August 25, 2018). "Ryan Trey Previews "August" Album With "Mutual Butterflies"". HotNewHipHop. Retrieved July 29, 2024., or sources 8, 2, 3 - those all all interviews, or press releases. Those are not national magazines, but same sites with news online. Then all most of the sources from 13- to 24 are literally interviews on online news sites. All, except an article on Billboard. So why are those considered "reliable" sources, but the article I added are not?

While I appreciate the work you put into the article you made, I believe my comments are fair. So I asked @SafariScribe to review my article again, as it must have been confusing for them to read it without a proper discography. J2009j (talk) 17:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

@Mr.choppers Do you agree with me on this point? Because I am actually confused, and actually even tired improving article and it looks like something unfair to me. I could be wrong, I barely created 2 or so articles and do not know the rules. J2009j (talk) 23:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

There is absolutely no need to remove sources, unless they are blatantly false. This is not a GA application. The process of AFC is merely to decide whether an article should exist. From WP:AFCR:

AfC participants should follow the standards set by the standard policies and guidelines for what makes an acceptable article. Article submissions that are likely to survive an AfD nomination should be accepted and moved to mainspace.  Mr.choppers | ✎  02:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Don't be tired @J2009j. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

@Mr.choppers, I'd suggest you stay away from this. Wasn't I trying to help the editor? So, if a draft contains unreliable sources, we should go ahead and accept it. Really? Please hold to your back and stop all these. If you know all these rules and try expressing knowing them all, then, review drafts. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I have no interest in reviewing drafts. However, when I see you do things in direct contradiction of the guidelines, I get bothered - and since drafts are almost invariably submitted by new editors, they do not know how WP works and they do not know how to defend their articles nor (obviously) how to create a perfect article. That is also not the goal of AfC - the threshold is whether or not the article should exist.  Mr.choppers | ✎  03:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

@Mr.choppers WP:BLP. WP:V and WP:NPOV (policies) trump WP:N (a guideline). If a draft uses unreliable sources it violates at least one of those policies. As a fellow reviewer, I know Safari regularly improves drafts to try to get them into an acceptable state (or if already acceptable a better state), including adding sources which appears to be what they are offering to do and should be applauded. It is not uncommon for reviewers to remove unreliable sources and sometimes one has to to be able to see the wheat from the chaff. Sometimes after you do cleanup, search for sources and see what's there, you find the topic meets notability so accept but sometimes you still find it would not survive WP:AFD so end up declining. S0091 (talk) 15:26, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Sources https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Afsheen_(musician)

Hi Safari! You have many questions, so i am adding my reply here- I replied- "why is this website not reliable?https://rateyourmusic.com/artist/afsheen/credits/ or this https://www.allmusic.com/artist/afsheen-mn0002764358#credits It is public database, build on CDs and official records. When you look an other articles with the discography none of them have citation on every line for each song, but links to general credits available. I am not adding information about charts and rest, but just credits."

you can also see this-

A dded there https://www.allmusic.com/artist/afsheen-mn0002764358#credits https://www.musicmetricsvault.com/artists/afsheen/5iwLVxdLzgm1cLrZunXzWR

In addition to other sources in the article. Plus, on the article about the songs, the CD is also added. You can check , same goes for all. So isn't it pointless go adding this for every single songs if there are over 20?

1. Evolution liner notes [CD] Hollywood Records (2016).

J2009j (talk) 15:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

@J2009j,forcing your own directive/belief /word to be true is a bit interesting and at same time confusing in a platform of guiding policies. I have given the reason why I declined your article and thus, any other question concerning your draft should go to WP:AFCHELP, where many editors will help you. I have tried my best and to be honest, Afsheen hasn't yet meet our guidelines here for notability. All music, rateyourartist, and Musicmetricsvault are considered unreliable (read WP:RS and see WP:TOI).

I know how discouraging this can be but that doesn't mean that "since SafariScribe has said so, so be it". No, Afsheen may come tomorrow and become notable. One of the very very ways of escaping this frustration is by browsing about the topic very well before writing. If possible ask questions including me, re-read the guidelines for musicians, actors, any writing, read other articles, e.t.c.

Also don't see the declining editor as a wicked person. Nobody on Wikipedia is wicked including you because you're a Wikipedian. Avoid using or saying against the user because they declined your draft; they saved you because when they accept, it may surely go to WP:AFD, and more trouble and frustration. I hope you understand me. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:56, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Dear Safari, I appreciate your reply, but I think you seem to be bias here, or maybe do you have some paid incentive? I gave you an example of the article you reviewer, just above mine. For example there are sources like 4 "Ryan Trey Songs, Albums, Reviews, Bio & More |..." AllMusic. Retrieved July 29, 2024. or P, Milca (August 25, 2018). "Ryan Trey Previews "August" Album With "Mutual Butterflies"". HotNewHipHop. Retrieved July 29, 2024., or sources 8, 2, 3 - those all all interviews, or press releases. Those are not national magazines, but same sites with news online. Then all most of the sources from 13- to 24 are literally interviews on online news sites. All, except an article on Billboard. So why are those considered "reliable" sources, but the article I added are not?

There are many articles mentioning the work credits for the article, you can open those and see. Moreover, I pointed out to you that songs are hyperlinked to the wikipedia articles about them, with also approved sources like CD's with names. In addition, this sources, if you pay attention, does not have any reviews or anything, but credits of the people https://tidal.com/browse/credits/4017874 Tidal is like Spotify, and artist publish their songs with credits there.

I may not have much experience, but having a good faith, do you believe this meets the "notability" criteria, while telling me entire table I made is imaginary or false? I commented on the sources you considered here.

Discography

[edit]

Mixtapes

[

edit

]

• EIGHT24 (2017)

Album

[

edit

]

• August (2018)
• A 64 East Saga
• Streets Say You Miss Me (2023)
• Streets Say You Still Miss Me - Deluxe Edition (2023)

J2009j (talk) 17:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Can you @CFA, editor who declined my article first time, to also look into this, please? I like it to be fair. J2009j (talk) 17:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

I am also adding this here. Does it look like I am "forcing my opinion". These are rules written here on Wikipedia, and I contacted you for objective review:

Criteria for composers and lyricists

• WP:COMPOSER

For the WikiProject, see Wikipedia:Composers.

Composers, songwriters, librettists or lyricists, may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria:

1. Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition. - "there are over 20 notable composition that even have their own WIKIPEDIA articles." Mentioned in over 23 sources I added to the article.
2. Has written musical theatre of some sort (e.g., musicals, operas) that was performed in a notable theatre that had a reasonable run, as such things are judged in their particular situation, context, and time.
3. Has had a work used as the basis for a later composition by a songwriter, composer, or lyricist who meets the above criteria.
4. Has written a composition that has won (or in some cases been given a second or other place) in a major music competition not established expressly for newcomers.
5. Has been listed as a major influence or teacher of a composer, songwriter, or lyricist that meets the above criteria.
6. Appears at reasonable length in standard reference books on their genre of music.

J2009j (talk) 17:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

 Declined with a long rationale given on the Draft. I realise you are passionate about having this accepted. Please use that passion to find far better references. Do not add them, but replace the poor ones with them. We need better, not more. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

To settle this on the basis that J2009j objects to any pushback for either work, I have Accepted it and sent it to AfD for community consensus to be formed. All comments from the review are on the article's talk page. I hope I am mistaken and that it is a valid article, and wish the creating editor success. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft: Prince Anahobe

Hello! You recently declined my draft page Draft:Prince Anahobe for "unreliable sources" and left no explanation. What was unreliable? Thanks! - Camillz (talk) 13:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean by "no explanation". Please read the decline box, which you may have done, that made you know it's about unreliable sourcing. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:16, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

@Camillz, when you cite book, you're required to fill the {{cite book}} template including the page (s) you got your information from; it will help the reviewer, and that, I can't see in your draft. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

ah thanks! Camillz (talk) 10:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi I have an update! I fixed the books, the book sources are properly filled out! Camillz (talk) 21:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Matador Network draft

Thanks for reviewing my update to this draft so quickly. I would love feedback from you on what it would need to meet the notability standard. Matador Network is one of the largest travel publishers in the world. It has more web traffic than Travel + Liesure. The sources include dedicated stories in major outlets with GuideGeek (one of Matador's main products) in the headline such as Fast Company, Forbes, Fox Business and I just added TechTimes today. I added a few more sources just now that I hope push it across the line. Any additional feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Caffrey, Neil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caffrey, Neil (talk • contribs)

@Caffrey, Neil, this should be Draft:Matador Network. I will take a look at it again and give feedback if it isn't accepted. Also I may leave it for another reviewer but a slight note: it has some unreliable sources. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Consider rewriting the draft ad "GuideGeek", which appears more notable. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

OK will do. Thank you. I also removed some lower quality sources from Draft:Matador Network. Would love any specifics on if there are still some you think are an issue. Caffrey, Neil (talk) 19:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Question from Ivijidata (19:34, 16 August 2024)

Hello, when i create a biography artice about a living person who is a public figure and spiritual leader, the article is getting rejected. Please help me adding the biography to wikipedia successfully.

Thanks Viji --Ivijidata (talk) 19:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

It's declined or rejected based on out notability terms. Can I see the draft you're talking about? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:32, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

SP allegations

Hi, what do you think about this? Wikishovel (talk) 19:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikishovel, I can only see the deletion log. Was that what you are talking about? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:31, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

No, it was sockpuppet User:Miplast whining that it wasn't fair that their article was being speedy deleted G5, but Galactic Theme was still up, though created (they claimed) by a sock of User:TheChineseGroundnut. I was only pinging you because you moved Galactic Theme from draft to main space in good faith in AFC review. A discussion seems to be restarting on the possible connection between the two puppeteers over at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tochi Clement, if you're interested. Wikishovel (talk) 04:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

If it was G5ed, then it's appropriate because they were a block invader. It looks like Josh blocked them. Thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Is that IP associated with them? If it was submitted by User:Miplast, then it's likely they created it as an IP editor, considering the sockpuppetry related to the Johnel article and their musics. I only accepted it because it meets the known music criteria, but if the IP isn't linked to them, the article should remain. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:55, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Exactly. It will probably need closer evaluation by clerks and admins to answer that question, and I'm neither of those. Wikishovel (talk) 05:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Request for Retention of Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai Article

@SafariScribe:

Dear [Safari Scribe],

I hope this message finds you well.

I’m writing in response to the nomination for the deletion of the Wikipedia article on Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai. I appreciate the time and effort you’ve taken to review the article, and I would like to address the concerns raised regarding its notability.

Notability and Impact-

Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai is a prominent figure in political journalism, with a significant body of work published in respected newspapers across Jordan, Britain, and the United States. His contributions to political discourse have been influential, shaping public opinion and policy discussions on a broad scale.

In addition to his written work, Yazeed has also made a mark in the field of poetry, sharing his creative expression through videos on YouTube. These videos have garnered attention and appreciation, adding to his cultural impact and public presence.

Some of Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai’s key accomplishments include:

• Published Political Articles: Yazeed has written extensively on crucial political issues, with his articles appearing in major newspapers in Jordan, Britain, and the United States. His insights have been cited and discussed by fellow journalists and academics, further cementing his influence.

• Poetry on YouTube:

His poetry videos on YouTube have attracted a following, showcasing another dimension of his creative work and reaching a wider audience.

These achievements clearly demonstrate Yazeed’s notability in both political journalism and poetry, aligning with Wikipedia’s criteria for notable figures.

Reliable and Independent Sources-

The article is backed by several independent and reliable sources that document Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai’s contributions:

• Jordanian Newspapers:

His political articles have been featured in leading Jordanian publications, highlighting his influence in regional political thought.

• British and American Media:

His work has also been published in well-known British and American newspapers, underscoring his international significance.

• YouTube Poetry Videos:

Yazeed’s poetry videos on YouTube provide an additional source of public recognition and demonstrate his versatility as both a journalist and a poet.

These sources provide comprehensive and independent coverage of Yazeed’s work, meeting Wikipedia’s standards for verifiability and notability.

Article Improvements-

In light of the concerns raised, I have made several updates to the article to better align it with Wikipedia’s guidelines:

1. Enhanced Citations: Additional citations from reliable and independent sources have been included to bolster the article’s credibility.

2. Expanded Content: The article now offers a more detailed account of Yazeed’s contributions to both political journalism and poetry, providing a fuller understanding of his impact.

Request for Consideration-

Given the above points, I respectfully request that the article on Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai be retained.

His significant contributions to political journalism and poetry, supported by reliable sources, clearly establish his notability under Wikipedia’s guidelines.

I am open to any further suggestions or edits that could improve the article. Please let me know if there are specific areas where additional information or clarification is needed.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards, Khalid Al-Saud Khalid Al-Saud1 (talk) 23:24, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

@Khalid Al-Saud1, I don't know the person, hence I can only accept that when they may have appeared in multiple and verifiable news sites. That's our goal. If possible, declare your relationship with the said article you've written about. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

@SafariScribe:

Dear [SafariScribe],

Thank you for your prompt response regarding the article about Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai. I appreciate your diligence in ensuring the quality and notability of content on Wikipedia.

Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai is indeed a notable figure in the literary and political spheres. He has published numerous articles in various well-regarded newspapers across Jordan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. These publications have contributed significantly to political discourse and have been widely read and discussed.

In addition to his written work, Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai has made a substantial impact through his video poetry, which has been shared and appreciated on platforms like YouTube. His contributions to both written and visual media demonstrate a breadth of influence that meets the notability criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia.

As evidence of his published work, I have included links to a few of his articles:

1.

https://www.jordanzad.com/mobile/index.php?page=article&id=59700

2.

https://hkjtoday.com/2012/10/46882

Jordan ZadKingdom Today:

This website is affiliated with a well-known Jordanian media organization. Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai has been a credited official writer with this media agency for many years, further establishing his credibility and influence.

Regarding my connection to Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai, I have no personal relationship with him. My interest lies solely in ensuring that Wikipedia reflects notable contributors to literature and political thought, and I believe that the deletion of this article would result in the loss of valuable information that serves the public interest.

I also noticed that there are not many articles about Jordanian writers or poets on Wikipedia English, which was one of the main reasons that encouraged me to take the initiative to write about them. Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai is definitely one of them, and I believe this article could be an added value to Wikipedia English.

Given the evidence of his notability, I kindly request that the deletion note be removed and the article retained. I would be glad to receive your response and to assist further with the article if needed.

Thank you for your consideration.

Best regards,

Khalid Al-Saud1Khalid Al-Saud1 (talk) 05:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Its not left for me but the community as Wikipedia works with WP:CONSENSUS. Also always express your needs in your own English and stop using AI to ask questions. It's not bad for me, but it seems to be like a second class expression. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Dear SafariScribe,

Here is another link for a published article written by Yazeed Al Rashed Al Khuzai in another well-known Jordanian media and newspaper:

https://www.allofjo.net/index.php?page=article&id=28100

Best regards

Khalid Al-Saud1Khalid Al-Saud1 (talk) 01:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

John Oyler, CEO of BeiGene NEW draft

Hi SafariScribe. Nice to meet you. I am the new COI editor for BeiGene, the pharmaceutical company. I noticed your thoughtful and diligent review of new articles and saw that you had previously reviewed a draft for John Oyler in June.

I've been with the company since July 2024. In my role I have put together a completely new draft for Oyler, including a few new sources which I hope demonstrate his notability. I'd be grateful for your review of this new draft and assistance in publishing the article in main space Wikipedia. Thank you, SunshineWinter (talk) 14:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

I have reviewed the draft and it's not notable. Being the CEO of a notable company is not enough to be notable. In those cases, I normally WP:BLAR the draft/article. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, SafariScribe, for your review. I had hoped that the new sources I introduced, specifically the Forbes piece, the two pieces from The Pittsburgh Press, and the pieces from the New Jersey Business Magazine and ROI NJ might have been enough to reach notability. As more coverage about Mr. Oyler becomes available, I will modify the draft and revisit the possibility of publication. Thanks again, SunshineWinter (talk) 16:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Request on 21:46:25, 20 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Scrobum

• Scrobum (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Every Single Someone (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi @SafariScribe! Thanks for reviewing, this is my first Wikipedia article submission so bear with me. Think this meets all necessary criteria for notability, have found other existing pages for films with less of a footprint. Wondering if the issue is overuse of aggregate-style sources? If not, please let me know what I can change!

Scrobum (talk) 21:46, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

UPDATED @SafariScribe -- I took another look at the notability guidelines, believe this film still qualifies but can see that the references I included are insufficient. Question: I found some other reviews of this movie online, should I include all reviews in the article? feels like overkill on that front. Scrobum (talk) 10:51, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Just bumping this up @SafariScribe -- Thanks! Scrobum (talk) 14:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Bumping this up again. Thanks! @SafariScribe Scrobum (talk) 14:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

@Scrobum, you greatly updated the article. Here are few issues to note and correct to get accepted. Projected Figures, Midwest Film Journal, and Apple TV are not reliable. At least, three film reviews from a reputable and reliable publisher/newspaper/magazine is good . Remove the above I have listed, find two other good sources, which you can ask me before inputting. Good luck! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks @SafariScribe -- working on it now! Only thing that gets funky is the Projected Figures link -- not to challenge you at all, I took it out of the article for now! But looks like "Projected Figures" is the personal project of Anton Bitel, who is wrote a lot of other reviews referenced on Wikipedia, but for different sources. Also see "Projected Figures" referenced on this Arrow Films rerelease trailer of Hellraiser at 0:20. Again not to challenge, just to question for future reference, but seems like this would qualify as a reliable source?

Asking mostly to gauge what Wikipedia would consider reliable for film reviews in the future! Scrobum (talk) 03:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Reliable sources are sources with editorial guidelines. They include national newspapers and magazines and journals. For film reviews, we normally see Variety Magazine, The Hollywood report, e.t.c. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Sounds good, thanks for the clarification @SafariScribe! Scrobum (talk) 17:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2024)

Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Keygen Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Social experiment • Happiness Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

Fantastic Four-related

Hi. I heard you moved Reed Richards back to Mister Fantastic because the move was uncontested or something like that. I was wondering if you would be able to take a look at the Ben Grimm article and see if it should be moved back to Thing. Just making a suggestion here. --Rtkat3 (talk) 13:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

It will require a move request. Thanks for suggesting. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Women at the Table

You've declined this AFC submission as a copyvio. Can you explain the violation and/or remove the offending material. My searches show that the duplicated info from https://www.womenatthetable.net/our-story/ is pretty much all names of bodies and organisations. Nthep (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

I rechecked Earwig and confirmed this. I was wrong and I have corrected it. Thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:SpangaS op Survival

Hi, Thanks for reviewing my article on SpangaS op Survival. I will work on it further and find proper sources until the article is ready for re-submission. With that said, I want to ask about reliable sources in general and my experience finding them. Some of the sources I added were from the Dutch article about the film:https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpangaS_op_survival. and some of them are archive links. Most of the articles regarding the film (such as general information and reviews) are lost. I managed to find a review from Het Parool: https://www.parool.nl/nieuws/spangas-op-survival~b965a62c/, although I don't know if that counts as a reliable source, I removed the last 2 sources by your suggestion. If you got more advice about finding sources in general, that would be apperiacted. TheDutchArchivist (talk) 17:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi!

Unfortunately I can't find much sources as they are announcements. The review above you got is a press release duplicating Gelderlander. I searched but couldn't find any. Reliable sources are sometimes national newspapers, peer reviewed journals, national TV network, e.t.c. We appreciate mostly ones with bylines and able to mark advert as advert and news as news and press release as one. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:47, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

that's a bit disappointing, but Thanks for your help anyways, Hopefully, I would find them and add them to the article, I'll try to do my best. TheDutchArchivist (talk) 17:52, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined my article; Requesting breif

Hello @SafariScribe , I am writing to you about Article Draft:Kaveri (2024 film) and thanks for reviewing it. But I was surprised to know that the article was rejected even by well-cited media and journal sources. Could you please help me explain what else I need to add? Thanks in advance. Prasadkhhanna (talk) 02:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Cinemarangam, mirchi9, tollymoi, watch.plex.tv, TFPC and others are all unreliable. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:05, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Review

Thanks for your review of Draft:Detachment 1! I think I fixed it! Rcm07041989 (talk) 12:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Request on 06:54:59, 24 August 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Mrsanjeevyadav

• Mrsanjeevyadav (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Swami Brahmananda (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I have submitted New Page on Swami Brahmananda. There is already some information available on wikipedia on Swami Brahmanand on the Page: Disciples of Ramakrishna. My Idea for creating a new page for Swami Brahmananda was that, just as the pages of individual disciples are available on wikipedia, why not a separate page for Swami Brahmananda? After all he is the most prominent among all disciples and at par with the stature of Swami Vivekananda. As far as reference is concerned, I have referred to the most authentic book published by Ramakrishna Mission on Swami Brahmananda that has been mentioned in the reference list and Bhaktamalike which is again written by great swami Gambhiranand who was also the President of the Mission. I have not added a single word myself but put every information I have got from the books published by none other than Ramakrishna Mission. I am a Mantra initiated devotee of the Mission and Swami Brahmanand is the Guru of My Guru's Guru. Kindly reconsider my submission.

Mrsanjeevyadav (talk) 06:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

We need to verify the books you used as sources per WP:OFFLINE, hence should come with the full bibliographical details like ISBN, OCLC, name, title (other details can be viewed from Cite book. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2024)

Director Sergio Leone (right) and actor Enzo Santaniello on the set of the film Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Once Upon a Time in the West Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Keygen • Social experiment Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

August thanks

story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in August! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Big big appreciation. Thank you Gerda for this recognition. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! More appreciation below. The images of 4 August - now under "places" - shoe a spiritual place, hopefully a tiny bit lessening the stress you announce above. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Precious

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

Thank you for quality articles such as Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Lalita Tademy and 2Baba, adding to quality content about minorities, for caring about articles for creation, for using the image of a white cat scribing up at night, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2950 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt, Thank you for recognizing my efforts to this amazing project. You are the best also. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Romance: Fontaines D.C - Draft Declined / Resubmission.

Hi, you declined my Draft for the upcoming Fontaines DC album citing insufficient references / citations almost a month back.

And also advised me to wait till the album is out - I'm aware it isn't, we still have 5 days - but I have greatly updated it since then and added, what I'd definitely considered recognized magazines, such as the NME, Guardian, Record Collector and the like, and have worked a great deal on the page and new sections itself - too with citations and links. I am well aware that my draft is currently missing a citation to the UNCUT review, however I do assure you - it exists - I'm unable to find a 'normal' linkable/citable alternative to it at the moment, but I am looking for it everywhere I can. Sometimes, If I've had the magazine myself, I upload it to a Public domain and get it there.

The other thing we're naturally lacking at the moment is Top Charts - well the album isn't out - and the album cover itself. That's about it really. But I'd love for it to be approved as I believe the large chunk of the heavy ends have been lifted myself, and any other information or editing from this point onwards could be done by the rest of the community or Fontaines D.C. fans like me.

Please let me know if there's anything I'm still missing, and if it would still take till the 23rd to be approved (when it releases.)

Thanks a bunch :) BulletToTheGullet (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

You should declare your COI relationship with what you've written following the guidelines at WP:COI. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Looking for your decision

thank you so much and I really appreciate your response.

I wish it's possible to remove the deletion note from that page

I did mention many sources in Yazeed's page with different articles too

Best regards Khalid Al-Saud1Khalid Al-Saud1 (talk) 05:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Wishing you the best also. I hope it doesn't affect your editing here on Wikipedia. It's a normal so-and-so process. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft Review

Hi SafariScribe,

i request you to review this Draft:Omkar Palav !!! it has various notable sources

and happy my last contribution on Country of Blind , was approved by you ! thank you Vakanada Putin (talk) 13:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Jonathan Shank review

Hello and thanks for your review of my Jonathan Shank submission. I have now noted on the article talk page the top 3 citations, stripped out many of the duplicative or tangential citations, and resubmitted. Thank you and I hope you will be able to take another look soon! PSPazW (talk) 18:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hello! Thank you for reveiwing my draft on Rui-Siang Lin so fast! Based on the declination for BLP notability, do you think it would be worth reworking it and submitted it as a draft on the Incognito site? Also, I love your page notice that pops up when I go to create a new topic on your talk page, I think I will do a similar thing on mine :) -- NotCharizard ^🗨 18:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Is not about reworking, the draft is fine but am afraid it's a WP:BLP1E, which we should avoid creating on Wikipedia except in cases where the subject is very very notable for the notable event (instance: Thomas Matthew Crooks that attempted assassinating Donald Trump).

P.S. Thank you for liking my page notice. It possibly can be created by a page mover but you can list what to input for you there, that I will create it for you. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Draft: Film Afrika

An article that you have been involved in editing—Draft: Film Afrika—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Karinvanderlaag (talk) 11:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

==

Good Day

As per advice I would like to start the discussion around merging the Draft: Film Afrika page into the David Wicht page.

Hope I am doing this the right way? I will then follow the other instructions in the template you showed me.

Thanks

Karin Karinvanderlaag (talk) 11:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Programme name

Hi. Even if "RAI" hasn't been changed (Talk:RAI/Archive 1#Requested move 16 July 2024), Non è la Rai (Talk:Non è la RAI#Programme name) was the name of a programme and, therefore, it's mandatory to write the original name; see, for example: https://www.nssgclub.com/en/lifestyle/16739/non-e-la-rai-history-tv-show-italian. JacktheBrown (talk) 20:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Safari

Good day Safari, was wondering if you saw this, you accepted it to mainspace because it passes WP:NALBUM. 102.88.68.119 (talk) 07:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for accepting my submission Fakim Wildlife Sanctuary

Cltr (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello Sir, Safari Scribe. Question about my submission declination.

Hello Sir, Hope you are doing quite alright, Im Guillermo Guzmán, the author of the Spaniard Dominicans article. Just wondering, what do I need to change in terms of sources and citations for my article to be accepted, what mistakes have I made, Please excuse my mistakes, As I am new to wikipedia, Thank you. Have a nice day sir and im looking foward to you're response. Guillermo Guzmán Peña (talk) 03:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Please can I get the link? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Spaniard Dominicans Guillermo Guzmán Peña (talk) 15:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft is promotional and likely to bear what's already or should be added to Dominicans in Spain. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Respectfully sir, I disagree. Dominicans in Spain is an article that focuses on Dominican immigration and connection to mainland Spain. There is a significant Old Stock/Recent immigrant population in the Dominican Republic with connections to Spain. I was trying to go for the style already present in similar articles like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Dominicans. Basically the article is about Dominicans of Spanish heritage or descent. I see your point for the article having a promotional point of view, Which parts could I reform or eliminate, or should I make a new draft entirely? But again, The article im writing does not fit in Dominicans in Spain, as it is the opposite of the topic. Thank you sir, Waiting on you're response. Guillermo Guzmán Peña (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Im sorry if this adds to your stress, But whenever you are available, Id like to discuss what we could reform and fix on this article, Thank you Safari Scribe, I appreciate your work. Guillermo Guzmán Peña (talk) 12:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

@Guillermo Guzmán Peña (talk page watcher) I have given this a skim read. Everywhere I see the word 'notable' I cringe. Notability cannot be stated, but it can be shown.

I think you need to give close attention the phraseology you have used. Please look for areas where you have drawn conclusions. These are original research, which is an easy trap to fall into. An example is this paean of praise: "Overall the Spanish legacy in the Dominican Republic is vibrant and makes up a very significant part of Dominican culture and heritage as a Hispanic nation." which screams of PR style material

You should only be summarising in your own words what is said in independent reliable sources about the topic.

In summary, I believe you need a far shorter draft, written more tightly, avoiding OR and praise. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Fair point Sir, I admit I did commit OR and the article had a praising tone in some sections. I didnt mean for it to sound this way, but at the end of the day when writing articles, I guess your not evaluating information, Just presenting it. I will avoid any "Showcasing" statements like the praise you pointed out, thats completely fair, Thank you for pointing that out. Any recommendations on how to source better? I think im thinking of removing certain portions entirely and rewriting them for better wording and accuracy. I Appreciate your help. Guillermo Guzmán Peña (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

@Guillermo Guzmán Peña May I suggest that you read WP:REFB and WP:CITE. Before taking any action, though, I commend this essay to you. It has the process that is ,most likely to create success for a notable topic.

Many people mistake Wikipedia for a blog or magazine. It is not. We may only record what is said about a subject in multiple reliable secondary independent sources, and im our own words. Wikipedia is a Tertiary Source.

We may not evaluate, not form nor draw conclusions. If, for example, there are two or more conflicting (referenced) statements about something, our job is to record that they each exist, not to choose which we record.

By the way, none of us here is "sir!"

Tough learning curve, isn't it? 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Is it improper Wikipedia etiquette to call someone "Sir"? Apologizes if so. Guillermo Guzmán Peña (talk) 16:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

I will look at it again @Guillermo Guzmán Peña. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

All of the pictures decorating it appear to be improperly licenced on Commons. They need to add value, not simple be decorative. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

What do you mean by them not adding value? In similar articles there are pictures of notable people who have heritage or descent, like for example celebrities, politicans, and public figures. As for the images of Churches, Cathedrals, Squares, etc, These are places that have been founded by and/or created by Spanish Dominicans during the Spanish colonial era, Using Spanish architecture and style, so it is a component of Spanish culture in the Dominican Republic. Could you be a bit more specific on what you mean? Also the pictures went through and were accepted on commons, and are not copywritted. Sorry if I am misunderstanding what you want to say. Guillermo Guzmán Peña (talk) 16:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

@Guillermo Guzmán Peña You probably mistake what I mean by 'value'.

We add pictures when they enhance the meaning of an article, or illustrate a key point. We do not use them to beautify it.

You need to look at c:User talk:Guillermo Guzmán Peña. Commons is moderated by editors, not by software. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

I have come to the conclusion that Its best to start from scratch. Are all the images going to be deleted automatically? I think I will delete my submission. Guillermo Guzmán Peña (talk) 12:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Alright sir, I appreciate this, Will rewrite and reform many sections of the article and submit a better draft, as well as look over my sources to verify them, also removing any tone or OR I might have committed. Thank your sir, Hope you are feeling ok. Guillermo Guzmán Peña (talk) 16:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Request on 16:44:21, 29 August 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Brooklyn315

• Brooklyn315 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Lucy Heavens (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SafariScribe! Thank you so much for taking the time to review my draft page for Lucy Heavens. I would love to get some insight please on the decision to decline the page as her fellow co-creator Nic Smal (who is mentioned on her page) was recently published that I also wrote. He has a similar amount of references, and in fact a few less than Lucy Heavens.

I believe Lucy Heavens does have significant coverage especially compared to other wiki pages that I have read. I would be happy to do another round of edits/looking for more sources but would that make a difference? I have already exhausted most of the possibilities. I could also dive deeper into her lengthy podcast interview for more nuances about her upbringing but again, not sure if these efforts would yield different results so I'm a bit lost and frustrated since I've been tweaking this page for several months.

Please advise! How rewarding that you work with children and young adults as a clergy.

warmly, Vivien

Brooklyn315 (talk) 16:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

I have helped out there. However, more sources are needed and I will find them; it's a matter of time. Thanks! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:37, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

While not usual, this practice is acceptable

We may accept a draft when under pressure from a creating editor, and then, with policy based rationale, send it for the community's verdict at WP:AfD. We need to state why we have done this in the deletion rationale in my opinion.

Actions like this should never become the norm, they are exceptional actions, but they allow us to resolve a difficult, probably circular, conversation by handing the decision off to the community. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

I know that, @Timtrent, but I wouldn't want to stress the editor especially newbies. I often like to do such with a stubborn one especially in cases of WP:POINT. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Declined draft - follow up question?

Hello @SafariScribe, I hope you’re well. You declined my draft here, and I was wondering whether you have read the discussion linked on the talk page here, and I you would be willing to elaborate on why it (particularly with the new sources) does not meet the notability requirements. It’s my opinion that we are significantly above what I have been approved for on my other account when writing about an org, but WP:Other does of course apply.

Would you be willing to either approve the draft or help me look for sources that establish notability?

Please note that I have a (mild, but still) non-financial COI in relation with the subject.

Thank you!

Sincerly, HelixUnwinding (talk) 09:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

I will look at it again and look for any available source. I am not assuring. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much! HelixUnwinding (talk) 09:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Hey, did you have the opportunity to look at it? HelixUnwinding (talk) 14:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

@SafariScribe hello, I wanted to ask you please, is my page correct or incorrect, is there something I should put on the page? Abu yusuf Iacoub (talk) 13:52, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Woops. Posted in the wrong thread. Thanks HelixUnwinding for pointing that out. Fixing now.

I am confused. Did you open this thread? Why posting herein? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

@SafariScribe I mean my new page called Capture of Madrid 1196 Abu yusuf Iacoub (talk) 14:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Update on your review

Hi SafariScribe

Many thanks for your detailed comments and clarifications on my talk page at User talk:Klighed.

I replied to you there with some suggestions a couple of weeks ago but I'm not sure if you get notified of replies on my talk page?? Just to let you know that there's a reply waiting for you there in case you didn't get a notification. Klighed (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Asking explanation for declining drafts

Hi, I saw you declined my drafts for Premium Crime and Dlife (TV channel, 2012–2020). What is the problem with these drafts? How can I get them published?

I have to say something: I titled the second page Dlife (TV channel, 2012–2020) and not just Dlife, beacuse I want to distinguish this Dlife channel to another Japanese TV channel with the same name, which replaced Fox in Japan on 1st March 2024. What can I do about this? Filippo.g204 (talk) 13:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

The reasons for declining your submission are explicitly written therein. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

I don't know why these sources are not reliable. That's the problem Filippo.g204 (talk) 13:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

For Premium Crime: MovieTele.it, TvBlog, tvprofil.com (this is used in many place). Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

• For Premium Crime: is digital-news.it a reliable source? I found many news about the channel on this website.
• For Dlife: I took the sources from a Japanese Wikipedia page: which of these are not reliable? Filippo.g204 (talk) 14:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

  [1] is not reliable. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:37, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

  Why is this site unreliable? What's the matter? Italian wikipedia always uses it. Filippo.g204 (talk) 10:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

  @Filippo.g204 (talk page watcher) What is not commonly understood is that every languagee version of Wikipedia is independent of every other version. The English Language Wikipedia has the most robust criteria for referencing and for standards for articles.

  You have great swathes of references in these drafts, but, when I skim them, I do not see any that stand out as passing WP:RS (except this one which we rate positively). There are no red flags, though.

  There is no harm in accepting these drafts, and allowi9ng the community as a whole to determine whether they should have a place here. However, that carries a risk. An article, once deleted by the WP:AFD process, is hard to re-create. We look at it very carefully.

  If you wish to take that risk please ask SafariScribe if they are willing to accept them or you can ask me.

  I feel a better approach is to have better references. Please do not add more. Replace existing references with better ones. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

  @SafariScribe @Timtrent What about this website? Is it reliable? If it's not reliable, I don' know which sites I should use Filippo.g204 (talk) 11:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

  No. @Filippo.g204, Sei parli Italiano? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

  @Filippo.g204, I'd recommend newspapers,.magazines, peer reviewed journals, and television stations that have a Wikipedia article about them. Also, if you see their description as 'blog', then, skip it as unreliable. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

  ITA: Io sono italiano, ma non capisco quali fonti italiane potrei usare. Se qualcuno mi aiutasse mi farebbe un favore

  ENG: I am Italian, but I don't understand which Italian sources I could use. If someone could help me, it could be great favor for me. Filippo.g204 (talk) 11:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

  @Filippo.g204 I will leave this to my learned friend. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:10, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

@Filippo.g204, List of newspapers in Italy. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2024)

Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is: Cancel culture Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Once Upon a Time in the West • Keygen Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI •

Draft: Chilai Howard (RESUBMIT advices)

Hi there, @SafariScribe, I am new to the wiki community and 5 months ago, I have created a new wiki for Draft: Chilai Howard and recently got declined. As per suggestions and helpful advices from the help chat box @Qcne, beside those Design Award Bodies, Hong Kong government, International festival/museums references, I have found more independent sources such art critics/art magazine/cultural news outlets towards Chilai Howard and/or his works. I’m writing to seek your advices if the following links will work before adding to the Draft, some of them are in Traditional Chinese though, my apologise.

(1) https://www.para-site.art/publications/this-is-hong-kong-15-video-artists/ page 20, review of my work, written by Robin Peckham, arts writer and Co-Director of Taipei Dangdai (台北當代)

(2) https://www.scm.cityu.edu.hk/events/chilai-howard-received-3rd-scm-distinguished-alumni-award

(3) https://issuu.com/prismcreation/docs/03/44?ff art magazine 三角志 page 44-45

(4) https://www.hk01.com/藝文/911338/香港藝術發展獎-認識當代後起之秀-延續本地藝術發展

(5) https://www.oneaspace.org.hk/art-critics-aug (art critics Grace Tsang under 《身在空間中的喘息》)

(6) https://www.oneaspace.org.hk/art-critics-july (art critics under 喘息空間：香港當代藝術展 by 許軒琳)

(7) https://www.cityu.edu.hk/aro/alumnistories/140.htm

(8) https://collection.news/thestandnews/articles/89635 (standnews review on Howard video work “O”)

(9) https://www.cityu.edu.hk/cityutoday/en/ct-55/reshaping-brain-and-eye-creativity

(10) https://www.frieze.com/article/critics-guide-hong-kong (art critic magazine Frieze on Howard’s video work “O”)

(11) https://m.hkej.com/landing/mobarticle2?id=1540016 (newspaper HKEJ 香港信報 on Howard’s 鄭智禮 work “ųm”)

apologise for the long paragraph and the language differences on the links, thank you so much for kind assistances and time for reviewing my draft. Hoping I could work on more of other hong kong artists in the future in this community 🙏🏻 Hongkongart (talk) 08:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Merge of Draft: Film Afrika into David Wicht

Good Day safariScribe

I hope you are well. I have merged the two pages as far as I can tell, and just wanted your advice on a new headline. I have proposed David Wicht and Film Afrika.

I am not sure if this is correct. It will now be a page about a living person and the company he created, so I am not sure how to tag it. Karinvanderlaag (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined Draft - follow up

Hi @SafariScribe, You have declined my draft The Earth Saviours Foundation. The reason for decline was the tonality of the article. Now I have changed that and according to me it seems neutral now, can you please help me further improve it? And to resubmit my article. "wikiog777" (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

 Declined I have replied on your talk page/the draft's. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason for rejecting

Hello SafariScribe, I just wanted to know before I resubmitted Draft:1971 Canadian census, did it get rejected because the links in references didn’t work or because the sources in said references are really not reliable. WikiPhil012 (talk) 15:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

I haven't been to Canada and will love to, if anyone is gonna make it work (hilarious), and I don't know about the Canadian census in 1971, and so with people who may come across it. Given above reason, my decline was because of sources; we need to see significant coverage in multiple reliable sources at least WP:THREE. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for replying so fast! I added newspapers articles to the references section. Which I guess may be called reliable sources. So in short, (or as we say in French “bref”), I’m filled with gratitude for the good reply you sent me. WikiPhil012 (talk) 20:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Mikheil Lomtadze

Hello. I deleted some phrases and sources, and also supplemented the article with encyclopedic information. Please take a look. I am ready to correct the comments. 195.49.205.27 (talk) 11:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

hi

hi, can you be my mentor.? Mysteriouslucifer (talk) 05:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia.

Sure, I will be willing to help, @Mysteriouslucifer. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Cathedral of the Protection of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Radom moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cathedral of the Protection of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Radom. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Theroadislong (talk) 20:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

@Theroadislong, so that user moved that to mainspace? You could have tagged for AFD because I don't see notability coming any time soon . Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi sorry about the generic message, I thought there was a chance of the building being notable per WP:NBUILDING but the creator took this to mean it would survive an WP:AFD and moved it. I had hoped to find better sources as most cathedrals do appear to be notable, I've not had much luck though so far! Theroadislong (talk) 21:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Request on 04:21:13, 4 September 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by TTTEMLPBrony

• TTTEMLPBrony (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Spiro Razatos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

About Mr. Razatos, he didn't actually direct those films. He was only second unit director on those films. Also, he didn't direct second unit on all of these films, a good chunk of them is only dedicated to his stuntwork on those films. Come on, man, clue me what to do please so we can get this done and over with and we can do on our merry ways.

TTTEMLPBrony (talk) 04:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

You see, that is exactly the problem. If he wasn't the major director, I don't think he'd pass WP:NDIRECTOR. We follow Wikipedia guidelines (WP:GNG) and it isn't in our hands to accept or define drafts anyhow. While we need more articles, we also don't need one that doesn't meet our criteria. I am sorry, but I can't do anything. You may do maintenance works and when experienced, like in the next month or two, you may begin writing drafts again. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Request on 14:01:54, 4 September 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Andrew Macklin

• Andrew Macklin (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Logan Henderson (engineer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Good day, SafariScribe --

Please see my follow-up comment. It may provide additional context that explains why Logan Henderson meets the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. Very glad to engage further if you like -- AM

Andrew Macklin (talk) 14:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Request on 23:36:53, 3 September 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Brooklyn315

• Brooklyn315 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Lucy Heavens (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there Safariscribe! Did you get my previous message about asking for help understanding why Lucy's page was declined when Nic Smal's page got verified? I'm really hoping to add back in many of the sources that you deleted from Lucy's page as I've sent on many wikipedia pages that are interviews are accepted.

I'm not able to see my previous message to you....so not sure if it went through. Thank you so much!

Brooklyn315 (talk) 23:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

It's not a problem, @Brooklyn315. You can go ahead and revert my help and stressful impact to help your draft. However, remember that we don't just look at other articles because they may have satisfied a certain criteria and the few sources are there to place more emphasis. From my view, I do see rejection or another decline if submitted since you've decided not to follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines for notability. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Got it, thanks so much @SafariScribe. Understood that looking at other articles/similar ones doesn't impact the criteria/Wikipedia guidelines for notability. I will revert the draft but also see what else I can add to bolster my chances for my next review! Cheers! Brooklyn315 (talk) 18:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Feedback on article rejection

Hi SafariScribe! I hope you are doing well. Thank you for taking the time to review my draft page for the artist collective Keiken. You rejected the article for "lack of reliable sources," which I don't fully understand.

Keiken are one of the most well-known worldbuilding artists working today. They have done numerous museum shows and regularly work internationally. They are included in every major worldbuilding exhibition that has happened in recent years, and I've seen numerous artists with a much "smaller" career be featured on Wikipedia, so I don't understand what the lack of reliable sources is. Could you kindly advise?

Is it because I have included direct links to museum websites where the shows have taken place? Would you prefer me to link news clippings and articles about said shows?

Thank you! WorldbuildingArtists (talk) 08:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

It isn't about seeing small featured articles. Read WP:NMUSICBIO to get familiar with our requirements for musician's notability. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you. I've read through the article you sent; but Keiken are not musicians or ensembles; they are artists (visual artists); their medium just happens to be XR/new media/video/gaming. It's the same thing as if they were painters basically, but their chosen medium is different and more tech-focused. So I am not sure how the music article applies to this case.

There are some bits from this article that do apply, such as: "Thus, notability is not determined by what the article says, it is determined by how well the article does or does not support the things it says by referencing them to independent verification in reliable sources;" and "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published," which again I have done as none of the references I used are in any way connected with materials that Keiken themselves have published... it's all independent museums, galleries or/and art magazines.

Generally, I've seen countless artists - who are way more junior than Keiken - having Wikipedia pages, so I am still unclear on how I can improve this article so that it gets accepted. Can you kindly advise? WorldbuildingArtists (talk) 09:52, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for the error, I should have cited WP:NARTIST. However, your draft seems notable, but I need to see more reliable sources that meets WP:RS and provides meaningful analysis of theor work, not just primary sources or gallery listings, to meet WP:SIGCOV criteria. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:25, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi again! I have read the articles that you listed, thank you for sharing them. Do you think that the article I've written should stay as is, it its entirety, but the thing that needs to change is to reference more independent and reliable sources analysing Keiken's work and the concepts behind it? WorldbuildingArtists (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi hi! Just checking in about this. WorldbuildingArtists (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Dominic Ferris – reliable sources?

Hello! With respect to my Dominic Ferris submission here, might you be able to offer some guidance as to whether it simply needs to have certain sources that aren't "reliable" removed, or whether additional sources that are more "reliable" should be added? I have included pretty much all the sources available, and I think they more than adequately demonstrate notability. Thanks! PSPazW (talk) 15:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

You should remove all unreliable sources from the draft. To know what we call unreliable, see WP:RS. For me, I normally recommend newspapers, articles, journals (peer reviewed), e.t.c. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I've removed the extraneous "unreliable" sources, keeping only the newspapers and the major industry press like Broadway World and Pianist Magazine. Hope you'll take another look! PSPazW (talk) 14:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

The Articles for Creation Barnstar

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar
		You know say my own no dey hard :) I like your contributions to AfC, no be small work you don do dia. I see am, plenty pipo don see am, as I like am na so dem like am. Try rest anytime you feel like say your brain wan fry, den come back with full force. I still like am as I see say you don dey learn plenty things already from the mistakes wey you bin make before. No looseguard, keep the good work up. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

This landed me above the earth. Thank you @Vanderwaalforces. Ná you be the papa of NPP:). Keep going high! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

"Blue Origin landing platform" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Blue Origin landing platform has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 8 § Blue Origin landing platform until a consensus is reached. 64.229.88.34 (talk) 10:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)