User talk:Prasadkhhanna

This is Prasadkhhanna's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shahi Kabir (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please source the "Early life" section, so as not to be an original research.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shahi Kabir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:58, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shahi Kabir has been accepted

Shahi Kabir, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:25, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaveri (2024 film) (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources, thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaveri (2024 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 05:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Prasadkhhanna. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. C F A 💬 04:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaveri (2024 film) (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GrabUp was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaveri (2024 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 08:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @GrabUp, Thanks for reviewing my article. I have added reliable sources to the article Draft:Kaveri (2024 film). Can you please review it and move it article space? Prasadkhhanna (talk) 08:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaveri (2024 film) (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NEWSORGINDIA.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaveri (2024 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 20:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ojas joshi

Hello Prasadkhhanna,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ojas joshi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

--- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 11:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prasadkhhanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am using only one account and do not have any other Wikipedia accounts. As a legitimate contributor, I have created and edited public information articles that have been beneficial to many. I have not misused my account in any way. I kindly request that my account be unblocked so I can continue contributing to a reliable encyclopedia. Thank you in advance for your consideration.

Decline reason:

Based on checkuser technical data, this account is operating from a range blocked for creating spam articles. The exact sort of spam articles created by this user. Good block. Yamla (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Review my block

Hello @Bbb23, and @Yamla

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prasadkhhanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my account was blocked based on concerns about the IP range I am using and the type of articles I created. I want to clarify that I am operating only one account, and I was unaware of any issues related to the IP. If this IP range has been associated with problematic behavior, I will make efforts to change my access method to avoid this issue in the future.

The articles I submitted were intended to provide neutral, well-sourced information. If my contributions were flagged as promotional or spammy, this was unintentional. I am committed to following Wikipedia’s guidelines and would appreciate any specific feedback on how I can improve my articles to meet the platform’s standards.

I sincerely request reconsideration of my block and an opportunity to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and consideration. Prasadkhhanna (talk) 02:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You may very well only be operating a single account, that only makes this meat puppetry. I see various clues in your behavior that support the idea that you are here to write spam, never mind the private technical data brought up by the last reviewer. If you think language like "Transectra Global Diamond Marketplace is an e-commerce platform that is revolutionizing the diamond trading industry" and "KS Prasad Khanna is a dynamic Indian entrepreneur hailing from Hyderabad. A 26-year-old young man with a diverse business portfolio spanning marketing, software, surveillance, and private flights" is a effort to "provide neutral and well sourced information", quite frankly you failed miserably and you are too much of a marketer to be able to do so. You should concentrate your efforts on a "platform" designed to accomodate marketing speak. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

Hello @331dot, @Bbb23, and @Yamla

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prasadkhhanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I respectfully request the review of my account block. I acknowledge that some of the content I created may have unintentionally violated Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality and promotion, specifically regarding the articles on "Transectra Global Diamond Marketplace" and "KS Prasad Khanna."

I now understand that the language I used was promotional in nature, and I apologize for this. My intention was not to market or promote, but rather to share information. I am also willing to delete or revise the articles that were flagged as promotional to ensure they adhere to Wikipedia's standards of neutrality and verifiability.

I would also like to address the concern about sockpuppetry. To the best of my knowledge, I have only operated one account, and I have not intended to violate any policies regarding the use of multiple accounts. I assure you that I will adhere to all Wikipedia policies moving forward and will work to create neutral, well-sourced content that complies with Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Thank you for your consideration, and I hope for the opportunity to contribute constructively in the future. Prasadkhhanna (talk) 09:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Additionally, please don't use AI to communicate with us, and please don't tag us all in the next unblock request. Thanks. asilvering (talk) 02:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are addressing us; but someone else will review your request. "Sharing information" is promotion; Wikipedia does not merely share information. It shares information to tell you that Walmart has a sale on televisions or oranges, but that is not valid article content. I suggest that you describe how it could be that technical data would associate you with a source of spam if you have nothing to do with it. Again, you very well could be only operating a single account, that only makes this meat puppetry(you doing the same thing as other blocked users). For any chance at being unblocked, now is the time to be completely and fully honest. 331dot (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @331dot,

I wanted to follow up on my previous unblock request in light of new developments and actions I’ve taken. It appears my account has been tagged in a sockpuppetry investigation related to @CloudFarr3r, and I have been blocked indefinitely as a result.

I would like to clarify that I have no connection to that account or any other sockpuppet accounts. If there are any technical overlaps, such as shared IP addresses or similar editing patterns, I am more than willing to provide any clarifications needed to help resolve this matter.

Additionally, in response to the concerns about the promotional tone of some of the articles I created, I have already deleted those articles. I now fully understand the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view and am committed to ensuring that all future contributions meet Wikipedia's standards of neutrality and verifiability.

I value Wikipedia as a platform and have always intended to contribute in good faith. If there are any specific concerns or points of confusion, I would be happy to address them directly.

I kindly ask that you review my case again in light of this information, and I am fully committed to cooperating with any further investigation.

Thank you for your time and understanding. Prasadkhhanna (talk) 10:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We need to have a policy against AI-generated unblock requests... C F A 💬 12:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hear, hear! IIRC, I've already seen a couple of appeals being summarily dismissed because they were obviously generated by AI. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know that we need any kind of policy against AI unblock requests in specific, since the policy is "you have to convince an administrator that you ought to be unblocked", and, well... -- asilvering (talk) 02:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]