User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:SafariScribe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

January 2024

Hello, Otuọcha. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Linus Unah, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 20:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for that Dax. I have read and digested Wikipedia so much that I can edit very well. But seeing the article again. I don't see any ads on it and all information was cited. Otuọcha (talk) 10:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William de Curtorim. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 15:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:Lalita Tademy, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 13:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Elizabeth Shown Mills moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Elizabeth Shown Mills. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. In addition, an article by the same name was previously deleted under A7. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheBritinator (talk) 16:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Great. I was about moving it to draft before I saw it has been moved. Will cite it and write to am encyclopaediac tone. Thanks so much!!! Otuọcha (talk) 17:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

No problem. I can re-review it when you are ready. TheBritinator (talk) 17:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dick Young (producer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Bhoj Raj Seth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhoj Raj Seth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhoj Raj Seth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

nearlyevil 665 14:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Theresa Onuorah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Theresa Onuorah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theresa Onuorah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BoraVoro (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

WMT Digital

I appreciate you contributing to the page but some of the edits you made to the page are simply false. WMT is not a social app as you changed the page to. I would ask that you please either revert the edits you made or fix the parts where you started providing incorrect information.Sportsfanlegend (talk) 19:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

I fixed it mÿself but please be careful to only make changes that are correct. Sportsfanlegend (talk) 19:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great inspection on Recent Changes and new articles. Kudos! TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 20:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of E. Nolue Emenanjo

The article E. Nolue Emenanjo you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:E. Nolue Emenanjo for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TompaDompa -- TompaDompa (talk) 18:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Enter the dojo/Matt Page

Hello, what do you mean by vanity and self promotion? It is a confusing reason to delete a page based on a real web series and the actor in it. The Cruentus (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beth E. Meyerson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Elias Mohammadi

Generally, articles should not be tagged with A7 tags less than one hour after the creator has stopped editing them. This is to give the creator time to expand the article. Mach61 (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

@Mach61, but you see there is clearly no importance. May be I used the tag at late. I will wait for some time but rest assured it will end up as CSD. I just researched and there is neither a source for the article. Otuọcha (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

We have other deletion methods, no need to rush things is all. Mach61 (talk) 16:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

No probs. Well, thanks too Otuọcha (talk) 16:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Geoff H Flavelle, GH Flavelle

A tag has been placed on Geoff H Flavelle, GH Flavelle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Okeke Chika Jerry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Okeke Chika Jerry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okeke Chika Jerry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 16:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Added as a courtesy because the user raising the matter at ANI hasn't done it. Neiltonks (talk) 11:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Neiltonks. I appreciate that. Otuọcha (talk) 12:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Doug Van Gundy on Who wants to be a millionaire.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Doug Van Gundy on Who wants to be a millionaire.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Good article reviews

Hello! I noticed that you are currently the reviewer for 14 good article nominations. It's unusual for someone to be the reviewer for this many nominations at once. It's unfair to the nominators because they will have to wait for you to go through all of these reviews one at a time. Based on your edits, I get the impression that you're still working on becoming fluent in English, and it's important that reviewers are able to proofread with English proficiency to make sure that the articles are clear and concise. You might want to consider applying {{db-g7}} to the review pages, which will have them deleted and reset it so another reviewer can work on them. I really appreciate that you're trying t