Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 62

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

DannyS712 bot 62

Operator: DannyS712 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 06:29, Sunday, September 15, 2019 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Automatically tag talk pages that meet specific requirements as being within the `Maritime-task-force` and/or `Aviation-task-force` of wikiproject military history

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Bot proposal

Edit period(s): One time run, then as needed

Estimated number of pages affected: 134 at first for maritime, 514 for aviation

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: This is a follow up to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 60. If successful, I'll likely file a larger BRFA for more task forces, but for now I want to make sure I can scale the AWB rules properly.

Rules for tagging

Talk page transcludes a {{MILHIST}} template (or redirect);
It is tagged with {{WikiProject Ships}} / {{WikiProject Aviation}} (or a redirect to it)
Is not currently categorized in Category:Maritime_warfare_task_force_articles / Category:Military_aviation_task_force_articles

Discussion

Pings: @Peacemaker67, Hawkeye7, Tawker, and TomStar81: see brfa above --DannyS712 (talk) 06:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is what we need, the parameters are correct. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:36, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — MusikAnimal ^talk 02:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This will have to wait until AWB is working for logging in again DannyS712 (talk) 16:59, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyS712: Any updates? — MusikAnimal ^talk 01:16, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MusikAnimal: I haven't had a chance to run this yet, sorry. I'm going to have very sporadic time until the new year, but I'll try to get to this soon DannyS712 (talk) 01:17, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. - 50 edits made - no issues seen (I confirmed every edit before it was made) --DannyS712 (talk) 00:06, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Approved. As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 07:09, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.