User talk:Alaney2k/Archive 14
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Alaney2k. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
New York Times
I don't dispute the name of the publication, but your (automated?) changes have a negative impact on readability, particularly when they produce the phrase "a The." Nobody except the Times is responsible for policing the Times' trademark. Please reconsider. 73.71.251.64 (talk) 06:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Spot of a mistake that's all. Another user has thanked me for a similar edit (without error of course). Alaney2k (talk) 19:25, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Just an anecdote: I once had a habit of hitting random articles and adding an extra space above the stub tag per WP:STUBSPACING. But it annoyed people, so I let it go. Brycehughes (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Let it go. Alaney2k (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Just an anecdote: I once had a habit of hitting random articles and adding an extra space above the stub tag per WP:STUBSPACING. But it annoyed people, so I let it go. Brycehughes (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Editing news 2020 #1 – Discussion tools
Read this in another language • Subscription list
The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.
The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.
- On 31 March 2020, the new reply tool was offered as a Beta Feature editors at four Wikipedias: Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian. If your community also wants early access to the new tool, contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF).
- The team is planning some upcoming changes. Please review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page. The team will test features such as:
- an easy way to mention another editor ("pinging"),
- a rich-text visual editing option, and
- other features identified through user testing or recommended by editors.
To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch 
these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.
– PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Overlinking
I notice that you have been linking Canadian in the nationality field in numerous infoboxes, with the summary, "wlink to Canadians not Canada per consensus at Cdn project, replaced: nationality = Canadian → nationality = Canadian". However, MOS:OVERLINK is clear that we should NOT be linking to "names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar. This generally includes major examples of ... countries ... nationalities". Could you please consider reverting all of your changes - Canada should not be linked to either Canada or Canadian, regardless of any consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada. And where is this consensus, as I am struggling to find it? Edwardx (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- It is Canadian that we agreed to link to Canadians. Back in the archives of wp:Canada. I have been removing links to Canada. I added a few in the nationality field or switched the wlink from the 1st sentence to the infobox. As discussed recently on wp:Canada, it is debatable whether Canadian people are a somewhat familiar subject to readers. For Canadians, or those nearby, yes, but still, a very small somewhat. Alaney2k (talk) 05:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- But I will stop adding. I think maybe that is still up for discussion. Alaney2k (talk) 05:28, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- I tried to find the discussion in the (extensive) WP:Canada archives, but searching for Canadian was just turning up too many possibilities - do you have a link to the precise thread? Most of our readers will know that Canada is a country and roughly where it is, and that a Canadian is someone from Canada. Of course, they could be better informed, especially some Americans who appear to be proud of their ignorance of the world outside their borders. But the key test as MOS:OVERLINK makes clear is what likelihood there is of one clicking on the link. If you think this is still up for discussion, where is this discussion? OMG, I have just realised that there is this very discussion where it should be at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Linking#MOS:OVERLINK:_nationality_in_bio_lead_sentence, and you contributed to it on 28 April. The clear consensus is against linking Canada or Canadian. Will you now revert your changes please? Edwardx (talk) 10:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- That discussion is about the linking in the first sentence. You have now brought up the infobox. Alaney2k (talk) 14:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- My position is that we discussed linking Canadians versus to Canada in the wp:Canada discussion. We as a group thought that linking to Canadians is better. So, I think I am okay in continuing to change those. I would prefer to have the wlink in the infobox, but I think I should take that back to wp:Canada. I understand that many editors feel it is overlinking to wlink to Canada or Canadians. But, however, many editors specifically added those links, and I think they may not be represented in the discussions that are led by people who want to remove them. I estimate there are anywhere up to 100,000 articles with Canadian linking. Alaney2k (talk) 14:25, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- You have still not provided a link to this discussion at WP:Canada. In any event, MOS:OVERLINK is an agreed policy, and takes precedence over any discussion at WP:Canada. Canada should not be linked in either the lead, the infobox, or anywhere else in almost all articles. Edwardx (talk) 12:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Project rules are not easily over-ridden. Example, the hockey project does not allow diacritics on hockey articles. Secondly, we don't go back and modify original authors' styles, e.g. cites and date styles. We live with them. Alaney2k (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- You have still not provided a link to this discussion at WP:Canada. In any event, MOS:OVERLINK is an agreed policy, and takes precedence over any discussion at WP:Canada. Canada should not be linked in either the lead, the infobox, or anywhere else in almost all articles. Edwardx (talk) 12:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- I tried to find the discussion in the (extensive) WP:Canada archives, but searching for Canadian was just turning up too many possibilities - do you have a link to the precise thread? Most of our readers will know that Canada is a country and roughly where it is, and that a Canadian is someone from Canada. Of course, they could be better informed, especially some Americans who appear to be proud of their ignorance of the world outside their borders. But the key test as MOS:OVERLINK makes clear is what likelihood there is of one clicking on the link. If you think this is still up for discussion, where is this discussion? OMG, I have just realised that there is this very discussion where it should be at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Linking#MOS:OVERLINK:_nationality_in_bio_lead_sentence, and you contributed to it on 28 April. The clear consensus is against linking Canada or Canadian. Will you now revert your changes please? Edwardx (talk) 10:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- But I will stop adding. I think maybe that is still up for discussion. Alaney2k (talk) 05:28, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Editing news 2020 #2 – Quick updates
Read this in another language • Subscription list
This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.
- Reply tool: This is available as a Beta Feature at the four partner wikis (Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian Wikipedias). The Beta Feature will get new features soon. The new features include writing comments in a new visual editing mode and pinging other users by typing
@. You can test the new features on the Beta Cluster. Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months. - New requirements for user signatures: Soon, users will not be able to save invalid custom signatures in Special:Preferences. This will reduce signature spoofing, prevent page corruption, and make new talk page tools more reliable. Most editors will not be affected.
- New discussion tool: The Editing team is beginning work on a simpler process for starting new discussions. You can see the initial design on the project page.
- Research on the use of talk pages: The Editing team worked with the Wikimedia research team to study how talk pages help editors improve articles. We learned that new editors who use talk pages make more edits to the main namespace than new editors who don't use talk pages.
– Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
I was hoping one day to...
...see if the developers would consider (or have considered) creating an alert of some sort that would let editors know if one of their changes added an article to one of the subcategories of Category:CS1 errors. Over the last year or so I've been doing much more work on WP by volume (so my edit count has been skyrocketing) and with my experimentation and mistakes using AWB, my changes often show up in Category:Pages with citations having redundant parameters. It's been necessary to monitor that category (hence the daydream about some sort of alert) and I've begun noticing your username there as well. Take care, Dawnseeker2000 09:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hello again. Do you mind acknowledging what I was trying to say? Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 07:25, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
@Dawnseeker2000: Yeah, I'm not perfect and it would help. Probably very low on the priority list, though. Alaney2k (talk) 20:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Editing news 2020 #3
Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:
- The 50 millionth edit using the visual editor on desktop was made this year. More than 10 million edits have been made here at the English Wikipedia.
- More than 2 million new articles have been created in the visual editor. More than 600,000 of these new articles were created during 2019.
- Almost 5 million edits on the mobile site have been made with the visual editor. Most of these edits have been made since the Editing team started improving the mobile visual editor in 2018.
- The proportion of all edits made using the visual editor has been increasing every year.
- Editors have made more than 7 million edits in the 2017 wikitext editor, including starting 600,000 new articles in it. The 2017 wikitext editor is VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode. You can enable it in your preferences.
- On 17 November 2019, the first edit from outer space was made in the mobile visual editor.
- In 2019, 35% of the edits by newcomers, and half of their first edits, were made using the visual editor. This percentage has been increasing every year since the tool became available.
Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
please fix your script
With this edit, the script changed this:
{{cite web|last1=Kovaleski|first1=Serge F.|last2=Alter|first2=Alexandra|title=Harper Lee's Will, Unsealed, Only Adds More Mystery to Her Life|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/27/books/harper-lee-will.html|website=nytimes.com|publisher=The New York Times|date=February 27, 2018|access-date=May 31, 2019}}- Kovaleski, Serge F.; Alter, Alexandra (February 27, 2018). "Harper Lee's Will, Unsealed, Only Adds More Mystery to Her Life". nytimes.com. The New York Times. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
to this:
{{cite web|last1=Kovaleski|first1=Serge F.|last2=Alter|first2=Alexandra|title=Harper Lee's Will, Unsealed, Only Adds More Mystery to Her Life|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/27/books/harper-lee-will.html|website=nytimes.com|work=The New York Times|date=February 27, 2018|access-date=May 31, 2019}}- Kovaleski, Serge F.; Alter, Alexandra (February 27, 2018). "Harper Lee's Will, Unsealed, Only Adds More Mystery to Her Life". nytimes.com. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
{{cite web}}: More than one of|work=and|website=specified (help)
- Kovaleski, Serge F.; Alter, Alexandra (February 27, 2018). "Harper Lee's Will, Unsealed, Only Adds More Mystery to Her Life". nytimes.com. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
In cs1|2, |website= and |work= are aliases of each other. When more than one alias is present, cs1|2 can't know which should be used so it emits an error message. Before blindly changing |publisher= to |work= (better would be to |newpaper= and rename the template to {{cite news}}) the script should ensure that aliases of |work= are not already present. Please don't make work for others to clean up.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 13:15, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing it. Alaney2k (talk) 18:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Looks like your script is still broken. This edit broke this citation template. Please fix your script so that others don't have to clean up after you.
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 19:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- Damn. I -will- get this right. Sorry about you having to do these fixes. I think I am probably going too fast and not double-checking enough. Alaney2k (talk) 20:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
please fix your script (2)
Continued from User talk:Alaney2k/Archive 14 § please fix your script
This edit at line 301. |website= is an equal alias of |work=; only one may exist in a cs1|2 template at any one time. In this case |website=timesofisrael.com should have been deleted.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 14:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
I've slowly been working on adding context and references for all the entries in this list. If you're adding new entries, can you please add a short sentence to each justifying their inclusion, and a reference to support it? Thanks! pburka (talk) 21:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Editing news 2020 #4
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
Reply tool
The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.
- More than 300 editors used the Reply tool at these four Wikipedias. They posted more than 7,400 replies during the study period.
- Of the people who posted a comment with the Reply tool, about 70% of them used the tool multiple times. About 60% of them used it on multiple days.
- Comments from Wikipedia editors are positive. One said, أعتقد أن الأداة تقدم فائدة ملحوظة؛ فهي تختصر الوقت لتقديم رد بدلًا من التنقل بالفأرة إلى وصلة تعديل القسم أو الصفحة، التي تكون بعيدة عن التعليق الأخير في الغالب، ويصل المساهم لصندوق التعديل بسرعة باستخدام الأداة. ("I think the tool has a significant impact; it saves time to reply while the classic way is to move with a mouse to the Edit link to edit the section or the page which is generally far away from the comment. And the user reaches to the edit box so quickly to use the Reply tool.")[1]
The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).
The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.
New requirements for user signatures
- The new requirements for custom user signatures began on 6 July 2020. If you try to create a custom signature that does not meet the requirements, you will get an error message.
- Existing custom signatures that do not meet the new requirements will be unaffected temporarily. Eventually, all custom signatures will need to meet the new requirements. You can check your signature and see lists of active editors whose custom signatures need to be corrected. Volunteers have been contacting editors who need to change their custom signatures. If you need to change your custom signature, then please read the help page.
Next: New discussion tool
Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.
Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Help me!
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... I am looking to engage editors on a topic on an article. Not a serious topic, really, but I have opened a topic at Talk:Godzilla (franchise) about the pronouns to use for Godzilla in the movie articles for the franchise. I am concerned that a silly edit war could break out about this, that is my real concern, I will go either way as long as we are consistent. So far, I have not seen any type of hatnote appropriate for this, and I don't know how to engage the related article editors. Thanks! Alaney2k (talk) 14:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Opening a talk page discussion is the way to engage editors, so you're on the right track. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 16:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
Greetings,
Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.
Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Question...
In this edit you converted a bunch of dates from yyyy-mm-dd format. I know some wikidocuments endorse doing this, but don't they explicitly exempt doing so for yyyy-mm-dd dates used in a context where brevity is desirable -- like tables and {{cite}} templates? Geo Swan (talk) 05:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Never heard of that. I use a script that sets the dates, so I believe it must follow policy or it would not be allowed. I have never had an admin correct me on the use of the script, either. The script used to have options for 'body only', but those don't exist anymore. There aren't options for y-m-d type dates, either. I think the idea is to be consistent within an article, following the first date format used in the article. Personally, I don't know why you would -want- to use an 'unfriendly' (less readable) format like that over everyday formats, though. As for the article, well that article was well over 90% month day year format, so it was obvious that a few recent edits were not following the date format standard established in the article. Alaney2k (talk) 06:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Women's Ice Hockey Task Force this month
 Though there are plenty of new articles to be created, current and former task force members have built up an incredible library of pages for conferences, programs, tournaments, and more, so there are plenty of ways to help – from small updates and cleanup to creating entirely new pages. Cross-Project Initiatives
Join the conversation: Women's Ice Hockey Task Force talkpage |
– Spitzmauskc (talk) 03:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
My editing repsonse to remove the Canada link per guidelines
Hi Alaney2k, Last time when you are removing the Canada link in the past, I was emotional and worried by removing the the Canada and some edits later I have restore the Canada link for the moment and I run away from Wikipedia. After a long month of my debating with Canadian Wikipedians for removing the Canada link. It was confirmed that Canada link is to remove the Canada article pro WP:OVERLINKING. After a long wait between 6 months and a year I have finally remove as many articles links of the Canada article as hard as I can. I would like to make an apology. I am sorry for restoring the Canada link in the past 6 months. This is my apology. Also two-tothree months later, I have carefully read the proposal at WP:CANADA for overlinking. I have already started removing Canada links as many as I can. I did remove Canada links as many as I can from January 2020. I'm just giving you some editing assistance. I know you remove Canada links already in the past, but I am removing Canada links as many as I can per WP:OVERLINKING. This is to help your editing assistance when you are not editing with Wikipedia. So, I have already apologize for restoring the Canada link in the past to you. Will you accept my apology for restoring the Canada link problem? And finally, will you thank me by removing some Canada links by myself for the overlinking guidelines for its assistance? I am happy to help you. Anyways, before I go, will you thank me by removing the Canada links by myself for the editing assistance when I take over from you. And finally, will you accept my apology by restoring the Canada link in the past. Currently, I am still removing some Canada links as many as I can per overlinking guidelines by myself. I hope you will respond to me for a positive reply very soon. Anyways, I thank you and please stay healthy and stay in one place for this difficult pandemic. Take care of yourself! 2001:569:74D2:A800:CCDD:EC60:A7AC:7923 (talk) 01:01, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Of course, apology accepted. Thank you! Believe me, we have many disagreements on Wikipedia and I have learned to not be hurt by differences of opinion. Best wishes to you! Alaney2k (talk) 02:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Changing citation parameters
Hi Alaney2k! I see that we both use AWB to fix citation parameters, and you recently fixed the Chris Dier article. Part of your fix changed |website=Chicago Tribune |publisher=Chicago Tribune to |website=Chicago Tribune |work=Chicago Tribune, which then caused the article to be included in Category:CS1 errors: redundant parameter. I've now fixed the article to removed it from the category. Could you please also check the maintenance category after you've made your AWB changes to see if any articles you've edited were accidentally added to the category? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 16:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
SWLJ
Sometimes you just have to kill 'em with kindness! That wears them out faster! --GoneIn60 (talk) 16:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- @GoneIn60: Bit of a thankless task the last two SW movie articles. Making the films themselves seems to have been also, what with all of the criticism from fans and critics and even the cast. Again, thanks for the smooth reply. Alaney2k (talk) 18:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Changing citation parameters
Hi Alaney2k! I see that we both use AWB to fix citation parameters, and you recently fixed the Chris Dier article. Part of your fix changed |website=Chicago Tribune |publisher=Chicago Tribune to |website=Chicago Tribune |work=Chicago Tribune, which then caused the article to be included in Category:CS1 errors: redundant parameter. I've now fixed the article to removed it from the category. Could you please also check the maintenance category after you've made your AWB changes to see if any articles you've edited were accidentally added to the category? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 16:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- @GoingBatty: Thanks for fixing that. Alaney2k (talk) 21:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi again! Found another instance in your edit to DaMarcus Beasley changing
|website=nytimes.com|publisher=The New York Times Companyto|website=nytimes.com|work=The New York Times Company. I've fixed this too. GoingBatty (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC)- @GoingBatty: Thanks again. I will be more careful. Alaney2k (talk) 19:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- If the people using reFill and Reflinks and other tools were more careful, then there'd be nothing for us to fix! Keep up the good work! GoingBatty (talk) 22:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- @GoingBatty: Thanks again. I will be more careful. Alaney2k (talk) 19:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi again! Found another instance in your edit to DaMarcus Beasley changing
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Six years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to QAI ;) - I have a FAC open, your eyes are appreciated! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Editing news 2021 #1
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
Reply tool
The Reply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.
- The Reply tool has been deployed as an opt-out preference to all editors at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
- It is also available as a Beta Feature at almost all Wikipedias except for the English, Russian, and German-language Wikipedias. If it is not available at your wiki, you can request it by following these simple instructions.
Research notes:
- As of January 2021, more than 3,500 editors have used the Reply tool to post about 70,000 comments.
- There is preliminary data from the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedia on the Reply tool. Junior Contributors who use the Reply tool are more likely to publish the comments that they start writing than those who use full-page wikitext editing.[2]
- The Editing and Parsing teams have significantly reduced the number of edits that affect other parts of the page. About 0.3% of edits did this during the last month.[3] Some of the remaining changes are automatic corrections for Special:LintErrors.
A large A/B test will start soon.[4] This is part of the process to offer the Reply tool to everyone. During this test, half of all editors at 24 Wikipedias (not including the English Wikipedia) will have the Reply tool automatically enabled, and half will not. Editors at those Wikipeedias can still turn it on or off for their own accounts in Special:Preferences.
New discussion tool
The new tool for starting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself.[5] You can leave feedback in this thread or on the talk page.
Next: Notifications
During Talk pages consultation 2019, editors said that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. The Notifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice at mw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications.
–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Newspaper names
Why do you think that it is important to add "The" to a bunch of newspaper names? How does that improve the encyclopedia? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Cullen328: I have found in my 10+ years of editing that many of the citations are rather poorly done. My main purpose is to check on minor things, like italics, proper cite params (e.g. properly use work or newspaper instead of publisher). My search focuses on articles with misspellings of newspaper names, e.g. LA Times, NY Times, NYT as well as the missing The from many newspapers. I usually find that the citations have mistakes too. Such as inconsistent date formats, missing titles, etc. etc. When I update the article to use the 'The' it works partly as a checkmark that I have reviewed that article. There are articles with just missing 'The' strings but almost all have some minor thing I correct too. Are my edit summaries not clear? I am getting thanks from other editors for lots of these edits. Alaney2k (talk) 15:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Senators
Would you mind helping out with a stubborn mobile editor, who keeps adding diacritics to the Senators pages. GoodDay (talk) 15:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: No. The team uses the diacritics on the player's sweater, so I am fine with it. I'm tired of and don't care about wp:hockey policy and won't police it. Alaney2k (talk) 15:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- That's not the compromise agreement. But anyways, thanks for turning me down. GoodDay (talk) 16:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: It's one thing to turn down obscure diacritics from foreign language references on place names, but when a single diacritic is used on a single player and is accepted by its organization, I find the policy to not be a feasible compromise. Lots of references in English sources for Stützle. Flexibility = compromise, rigidity = authoritarianism. Alaney2k (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- I disagree with you. The compromise was put in place to halt a long-term dispute between pro- & anti- diacritics editors, on hockey related articles. GoodDay (talk) 16:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: I said no and explained why. There is nothing further to say. Alaney2k (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- If WP:HOCKEY agrees with you? I may have to change my position on birthplaces concerning Baltic players in the NHL, born between 1940 & 1991. GoodDay (talk) 16:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: I said no and explained why. There is nothing further to say. Alaney2k (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- I disagree with you. The compromise was put in place to halt a long-term dispute between pro- & anti- diacritics editors, on hockey related articles. GoodDay (talk) 16:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: It's one thing to turn down obscure diacritics from foreign language references on place names, but when a single diacritic is used on a single player and is accepted by its organization, I find the policy to not be a feasible compromise. Lots of references in English sources for Stützle. Flexibility = compromise, rigidity = authoritarianism. Alaney2k (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- That's not the compromise agreement. But anyways, thanks for turning me down. GoodDay (talk) 16:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Italics
Why did you italicize the title of Canadian federal legislation, like the Canadian Bill of Rights? Srnec (talk) 00:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Srnec: That is the standard bibliographic form in Canada. Like the title of a book or a lawsuit, court case, etc. I know it is not consistently used in the media, etc. If you think I am wrong, we could bring it up at wp:Canada I suppose. I don't have my reference on this handy, but I was taught that back in school. Alaney2k (talk) 03:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- At this web site: here, section 9.28, under statutes. Alaney2k (talk) 03:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- It strikes me as the kind of thing you would see in a law article or court decision rather than enyclopaedic prose. It does not seem to me that "Canadian Bill of Rights" is usually italicized, neither in Google Scholar results nor Google Books results. Srnec (talk) 18:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Srnec: The Canadian Encyclopedia does it: Canadian Bill of Rights. Alaney2k (talk) 18:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- It strikes me as the kind of thing you would see in a law article or court decision rather than enyclopaedic prose. It does not seem to me that "Canadian Bill of Rights" is usually italicized, neither in Google Scholar results nor Google Books results. Srnec (talk) 18:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- At this web site: here, section 9.28, under statutes. Alaney2k (talk) 03:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Ottawa Senators season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Connor Brown.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you ...
 |
... for improving articles in February! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Conventions?
WP:CANPLACE is not about infoboxes. Follow it yourself. If you don't self-revert, I will do so shortly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Walter Görlitz: If you look at all of the other actors from Canada, their birthplace includes the province. If you 3RR me, I will report it. Alaney2k (talk) 23:55, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Would you like me to fix them because they're wrong or are you really going to argue that they're right and CANPLACE is wrong? Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- You must be joking. 99% of all Canadian biographies have the province in the infobox. Like I said, if you 3RR me, I will report it. I will abide by independent admins if you want to go that route. Alaney2k (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Would you like me to fix them because they're wrong or are you really going to argue that they're right and CANPLACE is wrong? Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you ...
 |
... for improving articles in March! On Bach's birthday --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
WHOCKEY News – April 2021
|
Women's Ice Hockey Task Force Newsletter: April 2021 | ||||||||||||
 Finland‘s defensive stalwarts Jenni Hiirikoski and goaltender Noora Räty stifle a goal attempt by Elin Holmlöv of Sweden during the 2011 World Championship.
Happy Spring WHOCKEY editors! After more than a year without international women’s ice hockey, we’re finally just a month away from the 2021 IIHF Women's World Championship! The IIHF Worlds, in partnership with the Olympic Games, are the most watched annual women’s ice hockey tournaments in the world and spark more interest in the women’s game than any other events. We have a great opportunity to enrich the fan experience by offering up-to-date and informative articles about players, national teams, and other subjects related to the tournament. The only women's players included in WP:NHOCKEY are players who have competed in the Top Division of the World Championship – meaning a bevy of player bios will get to be created in the next month. Hungary is set to make its Top Division debut and Denmark is returning to the Top Division for the first time since 1992. What an exciting time to be editing! Articles related to the 2021 Worlds that are in need of creation, updates, or edits are collected at the National Teams & International Tournaments initiative page. Please add to the list if you find something in need of attention so we may collaborate and help one another in the coming weeks.
WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NHOCKEY (which only includes players on women's national teams at the highest tier of IIHF competition)? Often times there is enough media coverage to meet WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. Be sure to tag the task force on the talk page of new articles with: {{WikiProject Women's sport|icehockey=yes}}
What a wild ride the 2020–21 season has been! Many leagues were able to complete the season despite the need for alternations and amendments with respect to COVID-19. Hearty congratulations to all of the league champions – 2020–21 is definitely one for the history books.
Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement?
Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WHOCKEY editors? | ||||||||||||
|
Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's ice hockey (WHOCKEY)! | ||||||||||||
 Women's Ice Hockey Task Force |
Layout, design, and significant portions of content created by Hmlarson with additions from NHCLS and Spitzmauskc.
– Spitzmauskc (talk) 20:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you ...
 | |
| wild garlic |
|---|
... for improving articles in April! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Ottawa Senators season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Connor Brown.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
NHL game logs
I saw that on some teams' pages you changed the links of recaps in game logs from external links to references. Which part of MOS justifies your changes? – Sabbatino (talk) 18:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Sabbatino: WP:EL. pretty basic stuff. Alaney2k (talk) 23:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- I figure we don't need to update the current seasons until they are over. Then process each season's table with Refill. Because who wants to go to the trouble after every game? So I am working on 19-20 and will progressively go back in time for each team season article. It will take a while and be a bit tedious, but the articles should conform to the MOS. I did all of Ottawa because I pay special attention to Sens' articles. Alaney2k (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Editing news 2021 #2
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.
The key results were:
- Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
- The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.
These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.
Looking ahead
The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.
You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
June thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in June, with some impressions of places, flowers and music for you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Laird, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Mackenzie.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of Canadian history, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Port Royal.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
July corner
 |
On DYK today, two songs, a morning song that a cousin gave to me, about the many meanings of rising, and the other praying for the courage to take the necessary steps. The morning song is a GA, - I should write more given my initials, but I also want to care for articles of those who recently died (now Esther Béjarano). - Thank you for improving articles in July, - I come a few days earlier than normally because the bloom is fading already ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
please fix your script
Re: this edit broke this citation. |website= and |work= are exact aliases so may not both be in a single cs1|2 template at the same time.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 21:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Dang. Missed it. Alaney2k (talk) 21:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Typo in Royal Ontario Museum
From the first paragraph in the History section (with refs removed):
The Royal Ontario Museum was formally established on 16 April 1912 and was jointly governed by the Government of Ontario and the University of Toronto. Its first assets were transferred from the University and the Ontario Department of Education, coming from its predecessor the Museum of Natural History and Fine Arts at the Toronto Normal School. On 19 March 1914, the Duke of Connaught, also the Governor General of Canada, officially opened the Royal Ontario Museum to the public. The museum's location at the edge of Toronto's built-up area, far from the city's central business district, was selected mainly for its proximity to the University of Toronto. The original building was constructed on the western edge of the property along the university's Philosopher's Walk, with its main entrance facing out onto Bloor Street housing five separate museums of the following fields: Archaeology, Palaeontology, Mineralogy, Zoology, and Geology. It cost CA$400,00 to construct. This was the first phase of a two-part construction plan that intended to expand the museum towards Queen's Park Crescent, ultimately creating an H-shaped structure.
Did it cost $40,000 or $400,000 to construct? I have bolded the pertinent sentence as I don't have the Dickson ref myself. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
@Johnny Au: Thanks for pointing that out. It was 400,000. Alaney2k (talk) 15:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
NHL rosters
Howdy. Would you please stop changing back to hyphens in the NHL team rosters? GoodDay (talk) 22:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: just messin with you guys. I don't know why you care so much about one size or the other ... Alaney2k (talk) 15:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Optics. Not everyone has perfect eyesight. GoodDay (talk) 16:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- I had my fun. I will return to my mature mode now. Alaney2k (talk) 16:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Optics. Not everyone has perfect eyesight. GoodDay (talk) 16:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
August thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in August! I try, today DYK for a GA by a banned user. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
September thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in September, - a good harvest! On Peace Day, Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:27, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
October thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in October! - Today: see yourself, read about a hymn praying to not be on earth in vain, about a comics artist whose characters have character (another collaboration of the "perennial gang", broken by one of us banned), and in memory of the last prima donna assoluta, Edita Gruberová. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Today: memories in friendship --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Joseph Cattarinich
This Hall of Fame link you created doesn't work. I don't know how to fix it. I'll leave it in your hands. Thanks.Stretchrunner II (talk) 09:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC) 19:53, 4 April 2008 Alaney2k talk contribs 3,592 bytes +113 added hall of fame link undothank https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Cattarinich&diff=203358872&oldid=203357441
- Looks like you fixed it? I was away for a few days. Alaney2k (talk) 21:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
November thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in November! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:17, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December thanks
 |
Thank you for improving article quality in December. If you like Advent music, check this out. If you like Christmas music and wishes, watch my user talk until 27 December ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
ref=harv
You know, this hasn't been needed since nearly two years now. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:17, 1 January 2022 (UTC) - thanks, will keep that in mind~ Alaney2k (talk) 19:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Summit series 1972
Hi! My name is Mikhail. I don’t know how to edit texts in Wikipedia. And I see you can do it. I have found a mistake in the article about the 1972 Summit series (USSR - Canada, hockey).
In the table with statistic of the players Starshinov has the number 18, but he had the number 8. Vikulov in that table has the number 8, but he had the number 18. Please, edit that table if you can.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summit_Series
English is not my native language. So I’m sorry for my mistakes. 174.203.128.176 (talk) 01:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
I need a source to cite for this change. I got the jersey numbers from The Globe and Mail newspaper. We need another source to change this. Alaney2k (talk) 14:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
January thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in January! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| Seven years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
30 January means 10 years of Precious. It's also the birthday of a friend, - I'm so happy I mentioned his DYK on his 90th birthday when he was still alive. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
March thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in March. Music if you like. Prayer for Ukraine. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The Prayer is on the Main page, finally + new flowers --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:47, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
May thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in May! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Editing newsletter 2022 – #1
Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list
The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.
23:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
June songs
 |
Thank you for improving articles in June! My song collection is especially rich, look, and the hall where I first heard DFD, Pierre Boulez and Murray Perahia. Do you find the baby deer in the meadow (last row)? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 Ottawa Senators season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Tierney.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
July thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in July. - I was away, for hiking in the Swiss Alps and a funeral, more on my talk. Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Editing news 2022 #2
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.
–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
August thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in August! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Look at the church where I heard VOCES8. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:8TeamBracket-NHL
Template:8TeamBracket-NHL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
At this edit you replaced:
| newspaper = [[Financial Times]]with| newspaper = ''[[Financial Times]]''| newspaper = [[The Wall Street Journal]]with| newspaper = ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]''
Please don't do that. The cs1|2 templates, in this case {{cite news}}, are responsible for proper formatting of newspaper names. Adding italic markup in an attempt to undo that formatting causes cs1|2 to ignore the markup and to emit an error message:
{{cite news | title = Bookshelf: 'Farsighted' Review: How to Make Up Your Mind | first = David | last = Shaywitz | date = 12 September 2018 | url = https://www.wsj.com/articles/farsighted-review-how-to-make-up-your-mind-1536705001 | newspaper = ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' | access-date = 11 January 2019}}- Shaywitz, David (12 September 2018). "Bookshelf: 'Farsighted' Review: How to Make Up Your Mind". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 11 January 2019.
{{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|newspaper=(help)
- Shaywitz, David (12 September 2018). "Bookshelf: 'Farsighted' Review: How to Make Up Your Mind". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 11 January 2019.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 15:25, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:16TeamBracket-Two-Reseeds
Template:16TeamBracket-Two-Reseeds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
September music
 |
Thank you for improving articles in September! Yesterday, we sang old music for two choirs at church, pictured, scroll to the image of the organ of the month of the Diocese of Limburg (my perspective), and if you have time, watch the video about it. And today I wrote an article about music premiered today, Like as the hart. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:08, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1897 in Canadian law
A tag has been placed on Category:1897 in Canadian law indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
It's gonna be brutal, but...
Feeling up for DVP version 2.0? - Floydian τ ¢ 01:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Just now looked at the article. That's a lot of citations needed. Alaney2k (talk) 02:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Boseko Lokombo
- added a link pointing to Congolese
- Carmen Barillaro
- added a link pointing to Italian
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jorge Camarotti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
October thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in October! - Look for mine: two favourite concerts were on DYK, and too many on RD (three yesterday). -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
2 new pieces --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amer el-Maati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuwaiti.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
November thanks
 |
Thank you for improving articles in November while I was on vacation. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Creation of an article on Wikipedia
Hello!
I really like the articles you create, publish or edit on Wikipedia. I’m not a Wikipedia specialist, so I would like to collaborate with a professional who has experience in this field. I would like to publish an article about Oskar Hartmann, entrepreneur, business angel and international investor, on the German or English version of Wikipedia.
I see it as a text about his professional career, investments and philosophy of life. Not PR or advertising articles. My name is Emma Rogers
Let me know if you are interested in describing Hartmann's biography as an author, please. I can give you more information RogEmma (talk) 08:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Emma,
- At this time, and through the holiday period, I won't be doing very much editing, so I won't be of any help. But don't let that discourage you, there are lots of resources here on Wikipedia. It's not that hard to write up an article. Here are my suggestions.
- As a start, I suggest reading the WP:HELP page. There are people who have volunteered to help new editors. Also, read the Help:Your first article page.
- Start your article as Draft:Oskar Hartmann or as User:RogEmma/Oskar Hartmann. You can work freely in either of these two locations, so go ahead and start it. It is preferred to start your article in either of those locations, then when it's ready for what we call "main space", you can move the article to Oskar Hartmann. That is when you feel comfortable about its content. (has references, infobox, sections, etc.)
- Since it is a biographical article, you could read the WP:Biography project page also. That project can help with peer review of your article. Biographical articles can get more scrutiny, so it's important to be objective when writing about a person. If there are any controversies, of course include them, but back them up with references. Read up on the Template:Citation references template. Also, avoid using information from Hartmann himself that does not have a reference elsewhere in a book, online media, etc.
- If you would like me to review your article, I could take a look next month.
- Cheers, Alaney2k (talk) 13:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hamilton Tigers (CPHL), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syracuse Stars.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Good job ! Supertoff (talk) 14:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- I translated it from english to french : Tigers de Hamilton (1926-1930). Supertoff (talk) 16:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Alaney2k!
Alaney2k,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:50, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:50, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Glen Park, Toronto for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Park, Toronto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by FortUser (talk • contribs) 05:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| Eight years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 | |
| happy new year |
|---|
and January thanks --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:36, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
back from vacation, see songs - Melitta Muszely died, RIP --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report
Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report
 Our 2022 Annual Report is now ready for review.
Highlights:
– Your Guild coordinators:
Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Editing news 2023 #1
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:
- The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
- They are beginning a new project, Edit check.
Talk pages project
The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.
It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.
An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.
New Project: Edit Check
The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.
–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
February stories
 | |
| my daily stories |
Thank you for improving articles in February! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:42, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:25, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter
Election results: In our December 2022 coordinator election, Reidgreg and Tenryuu stepped down as coordinators; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo were returned as coordinators until 1 July. For the second time, no lead coordinator was chosen. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators open on 1 June (UTC). Drive: 21 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive, 14 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 170 articles totaling 389,737 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Our February Copy Editing Blitz focused on October and November 2022 requests, and the March and April 2022 backlogs. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine claimed at least one copy-edit; and between them, they copy-edited 39,150 words in 22 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: Sign up now for our month-long March Backlog Elimination Drive. Barnstars awarded will be posted here after the drive closes. Progress report: As of 12:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 73 requests since 1 January 2023, all but five of them from 2022, and the backlog stands at 1,872 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
March flowers
 | |
| my story today |
Thank you for improving articles in March! - Today we remember the 150th birthday of Max Reger, who saw the horrors of a world war right when it began in 1914, while others were still in high patriotic moods -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
sharing impressions from vacation on Madeira 20-30 March, pics now at 24 Mar from the peaks --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Year in ice hockey category header
Template:Year in ice hockey category header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 12:57, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
April songs
 | |
| my story today |
Thank you for improving articles in April! - Today is the 80th birthday of John Eliot Gardiner. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
May thanks
 | |
| my story today |
|---|
Thank you for improving articles in May. - I had a good story on coronation day: the Te Deum we sang that day. And the following day we sang it for the composer ;)
I nominated Soňa Červená for GA just to give her a bit more exposure, and I took some pics of bright scenery - click on songs. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:32, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
WP:WHOCKEY News – October 2020
|
Women's Ice Hockey Task Force Newsletter: October 2020 | ||||||||||||
,_goalie_Katie_Fitzgerald_(35)_and_Minnesota_Whitecaps_Kate_Schipper_(6).jpg) Kelsey Koelzer and Katie Fitzgerald of the Metropolitan Riveters (in red) and Kate Schipper (in blue) of the Minnesota Whitecaps, 2018.
Hello WHOCKEY editors! The Women's Football/Soccer Task Force uses periodic newsletters to keep its members looped in on task force happenings and adopting the practice may serve useful for WP:WHOCKEY – let’s give it a try! If you have any feedback or ideas regarding the WP:WHOCKEY newsletter, please post on the news talk page. This newsletter is sourced and minimally altered from the WOSO April 2018 newsletter created by our own Hmlarson. Drawing further inspiration from WP:WOSO, work has begun on a few initiatives that will emphasize making more WHOCKEY links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles. The hope is that the initiatives will make it easier for editors to find the pages and topics of most interest to them. Initiative pages are currently in the works and will be fully functional by the second week of the month. If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, once the initiatives are up and running, you’ll be able to sign up on an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles. If there is a subject that you feel ought to have an initiative of it’s own, creating your own initiative is welcomed and encouraged.
WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NHOCKEY (which only includes players on women's national teams at the highest tier of IIHF competition)? Often times there is enough media coverage to meet WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. Be sure to tag the task force on the talk page of new articles with: {{WikiProject Women's sport|icehockey=yes}}
During the spotlight on diversity, editors are encouraged to celebrate the array of identities represented within the sport by improving or creating bio pages for ice hockey people of various cultures, ethnicities, heritages, religious beliefs, sexual orientations, gender identities, abilities, and other diverse characteristics. Next month kicks off the NOV-DEC-JAN spotlight on Collegiate Leagues!
Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WHOCKEY editors? | ||||||||||||
|
Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's ice hockey (WHOCKEY)! | ||||||||||||
|
Women's Ice Hockey Task Force |
Layout, design, and significant portions of content created by Hmlarson with additions from NHCLS and spitzmauskc.
Sent by: Spitzmauskc (talk) 20:46, 1 October 2020 (UTC); Updated by: Spitzmauskc (talk) 02:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
