Jump to content

User talk:Esculenta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I just finished reading the lead, and I must say, you have done well! I look forward to reading the entire article. It's hard to believe we didn't have one already! – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 01:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I was also surprised that we didn't have an article on this. I general, I think it would benefit the encyclopedia to have more articles on herbaria. Esculenta (talk) 14:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree! – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 04:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has led me to add another side project to my already massive to-do list, thanks :) ... ChatGPT has assured me that these are the ten most notable herbaria with sufficient existing literature to create substantial articles. Esculenta (talk) 05:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my. Umm, you're welcome?
Some of these might be embedded within the articles of their parent institutions.
These may help (or hurt): List of herbaria, List of herbaria in Europe, List of herbaria in Oceania, List of herbaria in North America, and List of herbaria in Turkey.
I'd like to see an article on TORCH – The Texas Oklahoma Regional Consortium of Herbaria. It has what I have found to be a very useful data portal. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 06:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Linnaean Herbarium

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Linnaean Herbarium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Linnaean Herbarium

[edit]

The article Linnaean Herbarium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Linnaean Herbarium for comments about the article, and Talk:Linnaean Herbarium/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kew Herbarium

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kew Herbarium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kew Herbarium

[edit]

The article Kew Herbarium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kew Herbarium for comments about the article, and Talk:Kew Herbarium/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:25, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Drepanolejeunea senticosa collection date

[edit]

Hi there! Excellent work on Drepanolejeunea senticosa, I hope you don't mind the formatting changes I've made. It's great to see another person interested in liverworts! I just wanted to reach out to discuss the collection date for the D. senticosa type specimen - you had it listed in the article as 1860, however, on reading Bischler's description I could find no mention of when the type was collected (she lists it as s.d., "without date"). I've removed it for now, but if you can remember where you found 1860 mentioned please feel free to put it back. Thanks for your hard work, looking forward to reading the other articles you've expanded :) Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 06:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I found the source I got that date from and added it back. I'm mostly a lichen person, but have recently decided I should learn more about the other cryptogams that are lurking when I'm looking for lichens. I'll be switching over to peat mosses for the next batch of plant stub expansions. Esculenta (talk) 06:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Graphis neeladriensis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only based on predatory publishers, not reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Plantae Barnstar
For all your excellent bryophyte work! I especially love what you've done with Trichocolea tomentella - such a common and widespread species certainly deserves a detailed article and you did a fantastic job expanding it. Reviewing your articles for WP:PLANTSSTS has been a lot of fun :) Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk

Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 02:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Given there are relatively few liverwort articles on Wikipedia compared to the overall 60,000+ plant stubs, I think this STS drive will have a particularly positive impact on this corner of Plantae. I think you'll also enjoy seeing the peat moss articles when you get to them - it's remarkable how stubby they were before, especially given the extensive literature available on them. Esculenta (talk) 03:06, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm very much looking forward to those! I'm not particularly familiar with Sphagnum (I've only encountered it in the wild once and never managed to key it out to species) so I'm excited to learn :) Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 03:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Graphis neeladriensis for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graphis neeladriensis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphis neeladriensis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Brodoa oroarctica

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brodoa oroarctica you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Just-a-can-of-beans -- Just-a-can-of-beans (talk) 20:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Brodoa oroarctica

[edit]

The article Brodoa oroarctica you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brodoa oroarctica for comments about the article, and Talk:Brodoa oroarctica/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Just-a-can-of-beans -- Just-a-can-of-beans (talk) 23:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]