User talk:Guylaen

This is Guylaen's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: BRITTINI (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NCOMPANY, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BRITTINI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BRITTINI, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:36, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guylaen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 00:36, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:BRITTINI

Hello, Guylaen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BRITTINI, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:BRITTINI

Hello, Guylaen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BRITTINI".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:36, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yesmowit Cemetery (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yesmowit Cemetery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yesmowit Cemetery has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yesmowit Cemetery. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yesmowit Cemetery

Hello, Guylaen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yesmowit Cemetery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yesmowit Cemetery

Hello, Guylaen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yesmowit Cemetery".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Research and Analysis Branch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Journal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:27, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as OSS Maritime Unit. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! BTW, how do you sign a talk message???? Guylaen (talk) 18:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can sign a talk page message by using ~~~~ (four tildes). In fact, most of the times, you don’t need that if you’re using the reply button, for example, the one you used (and will probably use) in this message. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Oldfield moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Frank Oldfield. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has issues which include but not limited to WP:REFBOMB. Please clean up at draftspace undisturbed. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! When I got to the 30th source, I started wondering if adding that many cites without more information was... too much. I googled "how many cites for a wikipedia page," and the only results that came up on the top page were suggestions for minimums. Guylaen (talk) 18:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only one (or at most, two) citations to reliable, independent sources (based on WP:R, WP:INDEPENDENT) are needed to back up any claim in an article. Not dozens for a single (or no) statement. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good to know! It really sucks I can't use the source that everyone else uses though, because even though he's an archivist, and even though he worked with a journalist to write the book, he's still an Oldfield. I'm not sure how Wikipedians interpret this.

So I had to figure out all of the sources he used. Thankfully he had a bibliography in the back of the book - but I still dropped thirty or so of his sources. Guylaen (talk) 18:59, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don’t have to use his own sources, perhaps. You are the one writing this article, you’re responsible for finding sources to backup any claim you make, not Oldfield. Have you read WP:FIRSTARTICLE and maybe WP:How to write an article? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. I think I just rushed into it because I think the man is so damn important and the world immediately had to know about him. But I'll remember to breathe, and take it at library speed. He's important, but the article is more important. Guylaen (talk) 19:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, this graphic is the funniest thing I've seen in a while!

Metaphorical ref bombs being deployed on a Wikipedia article.

Guylaen (talk) 19:17, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed funny. It’s just a pictorial representation of what a refbomb is. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Guylaen! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:51, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Guylaen (talk) 20:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Grombach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Pond.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Guylaen. Thank you for your work on Hayes Adlai Kroner. Another editor, Classicwiki, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Classicwiki}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Classicwiki (talk) If you reply to me here, please ping me. 08:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Federal Bureau of Narcotics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drug Enforcement Agency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fixed Guylaen (talk) 21:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Frank Oldfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howard County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fixed Guylaen (talk) 21:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carlsbourg moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Carlsbourg. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry!!! I wasn't paying attention to the time when I published it and I was five minutes late for work this morning, haha. It should be ready for publishing in a few hours. Guylaen (talk) 20:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your recent creation of Jorge Villaverde. Biohistorian15 (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle meetup events in September and October

Thank you for coming or responding with regrets to the 2024 Seattle Wiknic.
We wanted to let you know about these upcoming events in Seattle. Please let us know if you plan to attend here.

Scheduled meetups in Seattle

September meetup, Tuesday 9/17 6pm – 8pm (PDT)
October meetup, Tuesday 10/15 6pm – 8pm (PDT)
Wikidata Day 2024

This mass message was sent at 22:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC) by using a one time list derived from the Wiknic page.
If you wish to continue getting messages for Seattle Wikipedia and Wikimedia events, please sign up here.
To sign up for the Cascadia Wikimedians email list, please subscribe here.

AfC notification: Draft:Benjamin Rivlin (professor) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Benjamin Rivlin (professor). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benjamin Rivlin (professor) (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benjamin Rivlin (professor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Finkelstein (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It seems highly unlikely to me that he doesn't meet notability guidelines, but I don't see sourcing here that shows a notability pass, either. Can you have another look at WP:NPROF and clarify which criteria he meets? Or find more WP:SIGCOV, so that he meets the standard guidelines at WP:NBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lawrence Finkelstein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Guylaen. Thank you for your work on El Fígaro. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article about a Cuban magazine as I love learning about historical and defunct magazines and newspapers.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 13:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Guylaen! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Request: Alerta move to disamb, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]