User talk:NoJin

Welcome!

Hello, NoJin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Adéla Matasová, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 23:36, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adéla Matasová

The article Adéla Matasová has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 23:36, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Equestrian statue may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Riemenschneider Hl Georg.jpg|Tilman Riemenschneider: Hl Georg (1490-95)]]
Prague_CZ_007.jpg|Equestrian statue at Vitkov Hill of [[Jan Žižka]] from of Trocnov and the Chalice) (c. 1360–1424), Czech general and Hussite leader, [[Prague]], [[Czech Republic]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St. Vitus Madonna, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Plague and Corpus Christi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Death of the Virgin Mary of Košátky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kolovrat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antonietta Brandeis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, NoJin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Hynek Martinec.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for bringing the article on Hynek Martinec to English Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 22:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OCAT

Please read and understand this - articles should normally only be categorized at the lowest, most precise, level of each applicable category tree. Johnbod (talk) 19:57, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have ment your re-use of an old article and new pictures.--NoJin (talk) 20:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry? Johnbod (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sekyra Foundation

Hello, NoJin,

Thank you for creating Sekyra Foundation.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 01:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abishe, I was not able to find any other relevant categories. What do you mean by "unclear citation style"? Should I remove references to sources in Czech language? Thanks. --NoJin (talk) 13:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge

Hi, feel free to add your entries to this! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ArtLib.cz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ArtLib.cz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArtLib.cz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spicy (talk) 02:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Sternberg Madonna, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Sternberg Madonna, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

re: Sternberg Madonna

Hello, NoJin. You have new messages at Piotrus's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A toast sandwich for you!

s Lehao98 (talk) 04:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Collections

What do I have to do to convince you to (please) when adding of the museum under Representation in collections to:

make sure the museum exists
make sure the museum has a collection
link to the Wikipedia (you can use {{Interlanguage link}} if there is no English article, but one exists in another language
provide a source that makes it possible for a reader to verify that the museum does indeed have work by the artist, preferably specifically WHICH work
include a link to the online collection of the museum, if they have one

Thanks, Vexations (talk) 16:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Refspam

Adding the same reference on multiple pages without this reference being required to support anything falls under wp:refspam. You are free to add reliable sources where relevant to support content. Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 20:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have obtained this book only recently and consider it a general reference to several topics. I will quote relevant information from it, including the pages where they are listed in the next few days.--NoJin (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add the source when you add information to the article body that cites it. Adding the source preemptively still falls under WP:REFSPAM. CentreLeftRight ✉ 20:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I still think, that general references (or further reading) are legitimate sources to the topic of the article.--NoJin (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then you can add it to Further reading, but still, only where you are sure that it significantly relevant, this is not an invitation to simply add it to Further reading instead in all those articles. As you may notice, I have left your edits untouched for the cases were you added it to the Further reading section. Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 21:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Your edit to Propaganda in China has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Mikulka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jan Mikulka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 It is not UPE/COI. It is an offical project. They create articles about famous Czech artists and artworks on Czech Wikipedia and then translate them to English. You can read more about in this English language article. Juandev (talk) 11:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have added text and references from sources in English and recent exhibitions. I believe I have refuted all objections and comments and would like to transfer the article to Wikipedia.--NoJin (talk) 15:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jan Mikulka has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jan Mikulka. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 01:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NoJin. Thank you for your work on Vladimír Kopecký. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NoJin. Thank you for your work on Zdeněk Beran. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SunDawn, I have translated the entire text of Zdeněk Beran from the Czech Wikipedia and did not abbreviate it, because this artist has a completely unique position in Czech art with his work and as a professor and vice rector at the Academy. I am open to any suggestions for improvement, but I wrote the original text over several weeks and carefully studied all sources. There is no research of my own in the text, it is a search of articles published by art historians and the text was peer reviewed before translation into English.--NoJin (talk) 21:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aleš Veselý, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rail and Normalization. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Studio of Classical Painting Techniques of Prof. Zdeněk Beran at the Academy of Fine Arts in Prague moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Studio of Classical Painting Techniques of Prof. Zdeněk Beran at the Academy of Fine Arts in Prague, is not suitable as written to remain published. There are questions about its notability, as well as being written like an advertisement, rather than an encyclopedia article. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pavel Brázda moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pavel Brázda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:38, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 Hi, it is not an UPE/COI, as I wrote you before. Juandev (talk) 11:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And the question in here is wich section is problematic, that the user can elaborate it. Juandev (talk) 11:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jan Mikulka (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jan Mikulka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NoJin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Akevsharma, are you kidding or did you intend to offend me with that Teehouse. I am fouder and creator of the biggest project on art in Czech Wikipedia [1] and editor with 11 years of experience [2]. Jan Mikulka is an outstanding and one of the most successful living Czech painters. It is you problem, that you are unable to judge it from his work or international awards. To my opinion, the article was referenced adequately and by sources in English. NoJin (talk) 15:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@NoJin Teahouse is a template. So @Akevsharma may used a tool, which have created for him this text including the invitation to a Teahouse page. So think there is no need to be offended.

@Akevsharma Here I should support NoJin. He is a part of the project translated to English Art Library. They are creating Wikipedia articles about Czech artists and artworks and translating them to English. You can read more about the project in this English blog post. And regarding to the citation problems. I can see, that the creator points out on the discussion page, that he thinks, that he had fullfiled all objections. So do you agree with him, or there are still some objections, which have to be addressed? Juandev (talk) 12:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Studio of Classical Painting Techniques of Prof. Zdeněk Beran at the Academy of Fine Arts in Prague

Hello, NoJin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Studio of Classical Painting Techniques of Prof. Zdeněk Beran at the Academy of Fine Arts in Prague, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pavel Brázda

Hello, NoJin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pavel Brázda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pavel Brázda

Hello, NoJin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pavel Brázda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz the system is wierd. From my perspective the create is awaiting a review. It is not clear, what is wrong with the articles, so how the creater can elaborate it? Juandev (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jan Mikulka

Hello, NoJin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jan Mikulka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jan Mikulka

Hello, NoJin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jan Mikulka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adolf Hoffmeister, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roland Garros, Jaroslav Ježek and Order of the Republic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pavel Brázda (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many unsourced statements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pavel Brázda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GraziePrego (talk) 03:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Figuration, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richard Hamilton and Allen Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jan Mikulka

Hello, NoJin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jan Mikulka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pavel Brázda (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is very close, but most of the the current citations are not possible to follow. "Arátor P, in: Pavel Brázda, The monster waits, the monster has time" What's that? Where is it listed in the Sources? Please read WP:REFB to get guidance on fixing the references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pavel Brázda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 18:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wooden sculptures in Bohemia has been nominated for splitting

Category:Wooden sculptures in Bohemia has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jan Mikulka has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jan Mikulka. Thanks! Spinster300 (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jan Mikulka has been accepted

Jan Mikulka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 20:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeromeenriquez, thank you for your help. I did not have problems with my previous contributions to English Wikipedia before.

https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedie:WikiProjekt_Knihovna_um%C4%9Bn%C3%AD#P%C5%99eklady_do_jin%C3%BDch_jazyk%C5%AF NoJin (talk) 20:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pavel Brázda has been accepted

Pavel Brázda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]