Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/September 2011
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kept
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by Dabomb87 16:28, 17 September 2011 [1].
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it's been around for around four years and is showing its age, but moreover it recently had around 10% of the content removed through a copyvio. It looks at a quick glance to need tidying up to our new criteria including alt text for the rating insignia, MOS compliance, dead link etc. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per outstanding comments, article doesn't show activity. Albacore (talk) 15:16, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - simply is not anywhere near the FLC criteria.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - Sadly agree. BTW, is about.com a RS for wiki purposes? PumpkinSky talk 23:22, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe it is reliable, I personally use it. However, there are editors that have issues with it for FA-level articles.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:25, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.