Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/July 2019

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 08:32:33 15 July 2019 (UTC) [1].

---

List of uncrewed NASA missions

Nominator(s): DannyS712 (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the criteria. It was recently peer reviewed (see Wikipedia:Peer review/List of uncrewed NASA missions/archive1) with the only feedback being that it should be nominated. Ideally, I'd like to run it as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Space 2019. Thanks, -- DannyS712 (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Comments

• The most immediate thing that jumps out is that the lead is far far too short. It should have three good-sized paragraphs, not three sentences.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:17, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Comments by Kees08

At a glance I am confused as to what the inclusion criteria is. For example, I suppose there is Landsat 7 mentioned in the EOS section, but no mention of the Landsat program. What have you done to ensure all the uncrewed NASA missions are included here, and if not all of them are included, what is the inclusion criteria? Kees08 (Talk) 17:24, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Also, there are multiple uncited paragraphs. Once those are properly cited and the above addressed I can continue the review. Kees08 (Talk) 17:25, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

• I'm going to firm up an oppose. The lead is woefully inadequate, and in nearly a fortnight since I highlighted that, nothing has done to address it. I also concur with Kees08's comment that there is a lot of unreferenced content -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose – It's a shame because this is a great topic for an FL, but the lead remains way too short and uncited content is still sprinkled throughout the body of the article. If those issues aren't resolved, this FLC is unlikely to be successful. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:08, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose – per ChrisTheDude and Giants2008. – zmbro _(talk) 03:00, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Multiple opposes, with no work done to address after 3 weeks- closing. --PresN 08:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:36:38 14 July 2019 (UTC) [2].

---

List of accolades received by 2001: A Space Odyssey (film)

Nominator(s): ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:45, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

This is the list of awards received by 2001: A Space Odyssey (film).___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:45, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Comment - the list has now been merged into the main article on the film..........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

• It appears the list was merged back into the main article because there is not enough accolades to justify a separate list. I agree with the assessment, but I would advise the nominator to replace the table currently used in the film's article with the one that they made in the old list seen here. The table currently used in the film's article does not use any references while the newer one does. Apologies to the nominator as I can tell they put in work, but at least, it would not go to waste. I think that the FLC should be withdrawn since an independent list no longer exists. Aoba47 (talk) 22:04, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

• Comment – I noticed the same thing. I also checked back from before it was merged and it wasn't near FL status anyways. I suggest withdrawing it as well. – zmbro _(talk) 15:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Request withdrawn after looking at the comments I withdrew the request.___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

• Good luck with your future Wikipedia work though! Aoba47 (talk) 22:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:36, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.