User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 3

Pat Larter

Dear SwisterTwister - I am wondering what is your knowledge of the recent history of contemporary art from the 1960s onwards

also the sources that have been used include the Conversation which is an international journal of commentary on major cultural and political issues published in several countries and in several languages

and a website from the university of Western Australia and the Lomholt Mail Archive one of the world's best collections of mail art

for the importance of Mail Art see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_art

and Pat was globally renowned as one of the key women in the Mail Art Movement

I am a little concerned about the knowledge base from where your evaluations of notability come from - I am a curator and an art/design historian/theorist in Australia and I know the history of art in my country and globally very well

I will send these links through to the art portal too - as I think that the notability criteria could also be evaluated in that context too

Bebe Jumeau (talk) 14:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

gertsik

Dear SwisterTwister, thanks for looking at the submission of my article on filmproducer Els Vandevorst https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Els_Vandevorst. You have indicated that it is not clear whether Els Vandevorst meets the notability requirements in her field. Els Vandevorst has co-produced many internationally known and acclaimed films, and one of her films was nominated for an Oscar. That last fact alone establishes her as a very notable person in her field. I have included many third party references which prove this, and I'm kind of out of ideas on how to improve this article. Also you have indicated that there are not enough third party references. But other third party sources I can find are so industry specific it seems weird to include them here. I have seen many Wikipedia pages of notable figures that have way less references listed (for example the director of the film that Els Vandevorst produced that was nominated for an Oscar - Martin Koolhoven...). Could you tell me what else I could do to get my page approved?

Thanks allot in advance. Gertsik (talk) 10:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jvconrad14

Hi there-trying to improve the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kimberly_Ellis that was declined previously b/c there were not enough third party references. I added more references and took out unverifiable information. What else would you suggest I do/are there any specific references that are un-usable or any statements that need additional verification?

Best, Jewel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvconrad14 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jvconrad14 There simply needs to be any more available coverage for her to at least satisfy general notability and biographies notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

4imprint plc

Thanks for looking at my submission for 4imprint plc. you had declined the post stating: Some of these sources are not in-depth third-party coverage, please add any more good sources overall.
Can you point out specifically which sources you are worried about? I have a wide range of sources on this article and if I knew which area you were concerned with I can try to add even more. Any specifics would REALLY help. Thanks so much!
LeahVanRooy (talk) 16:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Underworld (novel)

Thank you for patrolling the article, renamed 'References' to 'General references', inspired by information from your page cause I did not use inline citations. All the tips and constructive criticism is welcomed, with emphasize on constructive :) Morfij.x (talk) 02:38, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Van_Robichaux

Hello, thank you for the advice on Draft: Van Robichaux. I would like to assert his notability and make the article better. Do we have to wait until Fist Fight comes out for that to be easier? I have many industry sources, but not many newspapers. Sonicfan1997 (talk) 23:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Jodcast Page

Hey TwistedSister, thanks for taking a look at the Jodcast draft. I took your comments into account and changed up some of the references from links to the jodcast webpage to journals (including astronomy and geophysics), magazines (astronomy magazine) and books. I also included a reference in a bbc news article. You were right, the primary links did take up a lot of the references. I hope the page is more suitable now, please could you tell me if you think it has been improved enough? Thanks Lupine Locus (talk) 22:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Beauvais entry

Hello there, I recently submitted a biog entry for poster artist Tom Beauvais and it was declined. I would like your help / advice in ensuring that it meets eligibility, would you have a moment to help me with the article? I am a poster collector myself and so am perhaps in a position where I overstate the importance of an individual because of my own personal interest. However with Tom Beauvais being one of Britain's best known poster artists and with a roll call of very high profile films that he worked on I was not anticipating that the entry might be rejected on non-notability grounds. The submission for artists requires meeting 1 of 4 criteria and I believe that the entry could be strongly considered under at least two of them.

1. "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors." Tom Beauvais is very well known amongst poster collectors, he has a number of red links already on Wikipedia and google search will reveal many more. The foremost scholarly text on the subject 'British Film Posters' published by the British Film Institute reveals that Beauvais is mentioned on 19 individual pages in the index at the back (the book covers 100 years of film poster art and only two other artists have more mentions).

3."The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Beauvais has created poster designs for many high profile and Oscar-winning films (Butch Cassidy And The Sundance Kid, Fantastic Voyage, Star Wars, Blade Runner, Mad Max) and he was also the resident artist for Stanley Kubrick for over ten years (working on Clockwork Orange, The Shining, Barry Lyndon, and Full Metal Jacket).

I hope you can help assess if this further clarification would make the individual notable. Aroundworld80days (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Submitting Version One Ventures with more citations

Hi SwisterTwister. Thanks for taking a look at my wikipage. I looked at the comments and doubled the amount of sources I have for this page. I think this makes it a more "notable" company that the general public can read about. I hope you understand that it's hard to find a wide variety of sources when a company is only a few years old and happens to be popular among those in the industry. This is the first of what I hope to be many startup-related posts, so hopefully I'll get the swing of this soon!

Thanks again,

Johnsonclaire770 (talk) 16:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Changes Barnstar

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		For the great and consistent work you do in patrolling newly developed pages on Wikipedia, I award you this barnstar. Your efforts have ensured that the editors who create redirects get notified when those redirects get expanded or discussed. Neelix (talk) 02:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Submitting Peter Lipman with a few more sources

SwisterTwister - Thanks for your review and for pushing for more sources. I added a few more including two computer science text books. Peter Lipman's biggest contribution to computing was at Digital Equipment Corporation - his operating system kernal and memory management work was fundamental and important to today's computing systems, which is why threads like this exist on USENET with people asking who he was. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.vms/c9_quls-Nc8/2VpapWb9hEcJ - I've done my best to answer that question, for example, I spoke with David Cutler - a man who is still alive in this world - and worked closely with Peter at DEC - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cutler - Peter is metioned in Culter's wiki. . Peter Lipman was not, however, the spotlight seeking type. There are no Steve Jobs style documentaries focused on him.. However, like the Walter Isaacson Book, "the innovators" attests to, Steve Jobs successes with Apple were built on the notable innovations of people like Peter Lipman. I should openly admit, the previous copyright violation was a mistake on my part. I added that text inappropriately. It was a copy and paste that I absolutely should not have done. Just a novice mistake from a new wiki contributor. Perhaps the added sources are enough for you to approve.

Thanks for all that you do! Cheers, etlipman Etlipman (talk) 08:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article Submission: Churchill Retirement Living

Apologies for the delay in responding. I was watching your Talk Page and didn't see that you had responded on the draft article page. I've included your comment for the sake of clarity -

"I simply wonder if there are any more good sources talking about them overall than the listed thirty (30). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)}}"[reply]

I think I understand. Do you mean reliable sources? I've gone back and done some more research and added in several additional sources. These include The Times and City A.M., as well as some regional and local newspapers. There are now 18 sources listed, which include national newspapers (Express, Telegraph, The Times, This Is Money/Daily Mail), Local/regional newspapers (Bournemouth Echo, Bucks Free Press, City A.M., Oxford Times, Salisbury Journal, Wetherby News), Local government (Adur & Worthing Council, Winchester Council), and Industry publications (Best Companies, Construction News, Estate Agent Today, Gazette Series, Housebuilder & Developer, and Seniors Housing). I have omitted additional sources like other local and regional publications because I feel that would just be duplicating the ones already listed, but they are available, if needs be. Perhaps you can give your thoughts when possible. Thank you Fbell74 (talk) 03:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you're quite busy with queries at the moment, so I'll just resubmit the revised article and see how it goes. However, if you get an opportunity, please do respond in any case. Thanks 112.205.196.224 (talk) 02:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply on the article page. I've responded there, but for clarity am including the response here as well -

"I could include more information on their property developments in various locations. Do you think that would speak to notability? I could try and put together a breakdown of their geographical spread in the UK as well. Would that help?" Fbell74 (talk) 04:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment on the article page. I agree with you that including additional sources that relate to the company's developments may not add to the article, as there are several of these already included. The company is mentioned in articles in such newspapers as the Times, Express, Telegraph and Guardian, and I've included these in the article already. So, source material isn't an issue, I would think. The company lies just outside the Top 250 privately held companies in the UK (about £8M less in turnover than the 250th, which has £147.7M in turnover [I can provide a source for this]). It's also been ranked as one of the top 50 small companies to work for in the UK by the Sunday Times. Would that not be sufficient in terms of notability? Fbell74 (talk) 07:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I noticed that a competitor (McCarthy & Stone) has had an article published. While the latter is a bigger organisation the two can be considered rivals and the other article also has far fewer sources and those that are included are from a much narrower range than the Churchill Retirement Living article. With this in mind, do you think the article merits approval? Thank you Fbell74 (talk) 06:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, and a tiny inquiry

Hello, sir.

First of all I'd like to thank you for patrolling my page Huzama Habayeb; I highly appreciate it.

I have an inquiry, too; and I hope you'll be able to help me out. After I had created the page in English, I joined the Arabic part of Wikipedia to create an Arabic counterpart of the English page. I saw a translation tool that would allow me to directly create the page, add the references, media, and every other component in the page automatically; and I simply needed to just translate the text. I started doing that, but I when I was finished and published the article, I found out that every time I needed to edit something it would have to be reviewed by someone to be published although the page is mine. I didn't face this problem while I was creating the English page. And now, there are numerous edits and tonnes of additions that I've already made in the Arabic page but they need to be reviewed. Unfortunately, however, the guys at the Arabic version of Wikipedia are not that active.

What I want to kindly ask you is: first, would it be possible for you to approve my edits or does it have to be someone from the Arabic Wikipedia staff? and second, why is this happening in the first place? It's me who created the page; I should be able to edit however I like and the changes should be instantaneous—and that was the case while I was creating the English page—and then eventually, some editor would go through the whole thing and patrol the page, right?

Thanks in advance, sir.

Abdallah a.k.a Angevilish (talk) 07:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an active member of Arabic Wiki nor am I an Arabic speaker so it would have to be one of the users there, yes. Cheers,

SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Creation Ramanananda Maharshi

Hi SwisterTwister, I have made fews edits in the article and added hindu news, metro india news, regional(Telugu) newspaper citations and other websites of World records as a resource for subjects notability. Please verify and publish the article

Thanks a Lot for your suggestion

I've already read your comment and added news citations to article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vcky92 (talk • contribs) 08:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Vcky92 (talk) 07:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07:32:28, 9 November 2015 review of submission by Venkateshburli

Venkateshburli (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Geophysical signal analysis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would firstly like to thank you for reviewing my submission. If you would please elaborate on the "article being more like a report" part, it would greatly help in editing my submission.

Also, since it is my first time article writing experience kindly suggest me the changes which will help in my submission being accepted.

Venkateshburli (talk) 07:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly Venkateshburli, the article looks more like something you would see in an academic journal rather than a formal encyclopedia article (honest, simply look at any other related subject). Feel welcome to continue to learn how editing works and please ask if you need any further help. SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:46:37, 9 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Venkateshburli

Venkateshburli (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Geophysical signal analysis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As this article had not been written previously, I wanted to introduce the concepts involved in geophysical signal processing. I would be grateful to you if suggest me improvements. Also, Can an analysis of a topic be on Wikipedia? If not, kindly help me in making this submission more like an article.

Thanks.

Venkateshburli (talk) 07:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like an interesting subject but it may need a better lead with better information for viewers unfamiliar with the subject. Consider seeing WP:Writing better articles and WP:Your first article. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:51:34, 9 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Sujith Aradhya

Sujith Aradhya (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Akhil rabindra (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Sujith Aradhya (talk) 07:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the content of Akhil Rabindra who is a sports person.

08:15:37, 9 November 2015 review of submission by Sujith Aradhya

Sujith Aradhya (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Akhil rabindra (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Sujith Aradhya (talk) 08:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)The Sports person must "Have been enshrined in any notable motorsports hall of fame." this is achieved by Akhil Rabindra as he has been the winner for the FIA Young Drivers Excellence Academy 2014. Akhil Rabindra with this achievement has been enshrined in a notable motorsports hall of fame at the FIA Academy.Sujith Aradhya (talk) 08:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gauss Lectures, resubmitting

Thank you for your comments on the Draft:Gauss Lectureship. As discussed, I added third-party sources for the last lectures (all lectures from 2015), using a mainstream newspaper, a more specialized (but general-public) news portal and the news services of two universities. At this point this draft has more references than the original (German) page https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gau%C3%9F-Vorlesung and also than the Portuguese version. Initially I planned only to translate! Thanks for your reviewing work. 178.197.235.140 (talk) 12:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bridges Ventures LLP

Hi Swister Twister,

Thanks for your message. Am working on it, will hopefully be able to get a redraft with you soon.

thanks! Aung2015

88.98.34.53 (talk) 12:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Medieval Women Mysticism

A tag has been placed on Medieval Women Mysticism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Speech Production

A tag has been placed on Speech Production requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:19:34, 9 November 2015 review of submission by Finfwaz

Finfwaz (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Pivotal Corporation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister - Can you provide examples of what you consider good coverage, or what you want to know about this company in order for the draft to be accepted? Thanks for the advice.

17:20:07, 9 November 2015 review of submission by Finfwaz

Finfwaz (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Pivotal Corporation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister - Can you provide examples of what you consider good coverage, or what you want to know about this company in order for the draft to be accepted? Thanks for the advice. Finfwaz (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Discovery and Development of Selective progesterone receptor modulators has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Discovery and Development of Selective progesterone receptor modulators. Thanks! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 03:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
Mouth full of sweets,
Home full of lamps,
And festival full of sweet memories...

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

St Michael's Rowing Club

I see you declined Draft:St Michael's Rowing Club a few days ago. I could only see on reliable third party source that seemed to indicate any true notability. In fact I think it fails WP:CLUB as many of the source only mention it in passing or are about individuals associated with it. Just my 2c worth. ww2censor (talk) 10:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had a thought

Like you, I see clear reasons for AFC acceptance or pushing material back, or even deleting it. Like you I am decisive. I'm not sure that makes me any good, of course, but that's for others to judge

The thought is that I believe you can be even more useful for the editors whose work you review, and without huge effort, perhaps with less effort.

Over the time I've been reviewing I have found I get the fewest questions about my reviews when I give detailed comments. The comments I use change for time to time. I use them as a selection of comments that I modify to suit the occasion and combine in many and mysterious ways. If they are any help to you please feel free to dip in. User:Timtrent/Reviewing contains the list. Fiddle Faddle 12:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:47:28, 10 November 2015 review of submission by Nyc229

Nyc229 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:PubMatic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to understand how I can provide more pieces of third party coverage in order to meet the Companies guidelines. Will the following pieces of coverage suffice?

http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20130918/TECHNOLOGY/130919875/pubmatic-to-move-add-20-employees http://www.beet.tv/2014/05/pubmatic-2.html http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/226139/pubmatic-puts-mobile-in-motion-acquires-ad-server.html http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/252582/pubmatic-partners-with-integral-to-roll-out-brand.html

Yannis Tseklenis draft

I have resubmitted this, after adding the references you suggested. What do you think? (Akouzi (talk) 16:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)) Akouzi (talk) 16:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:33:21, 10 November 2015 review of submission by Lisagranado

Lisagranado (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Gulf Coast Western (2) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing the page. I am wondering what I need to add? The oil and gas exploration industry has many different players and in order to understand the full picture it is important to be aware of the small players too--especially now while oil prices are low many small companies that are well leveraged are able to buy development acreage/wells that were disproportionately priced previously. That makes many small companies key players in the oil and gas industry, as well as key players in America's economy since they are providing investment opportunities and providing extra tax income to states. Also, in comparison to some other Wikipedia oil and gas company pages such as Vaalco Energy, the Gulf Coast Western page has many more references as well as links to other educational Wiki pages--proving it's activities and importance. Lisagranado (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:41:20, 10 November 2015 review of submission by Venkateshburli

Venkateshburli (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Geophysical signal analysis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Your suggestions were very valuable in my editing. I have made changes to the lead section.Kindly re-review the article.

Venkateshburli (talk) 22:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

00:23:57, 11 November 2015 review of submission by DrIsaiahRoy

DrIsaiahRoy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:International Society for Mountain Medicine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there. I'm not sure I understand the reason the article was declined. You wrote: "This still needs any more available coverage overall" Perhaps you could elaborate as I find the message of your suggestion is quite unclear to me (to the point of being nonsensical :S)

I appreciate your clarification. IR

Request on 01:27:55, 11 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mxx boss

Mxx boss (talk · contribs)
- Draft:FireFLY (LifeIsGood) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister,
Thanks for your review on the page "FireFLY (LifeIsGood)".
I have made several modifications to the page, I hope they gonna match your request.
The pictures are also on permission request to OTRS.
Let me know if I can improve the article in any way.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Best regards !
Mxx boss (talk) 01:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03:54:09, 11 November 2015 review of submission by Tom jowett

Tom jowett (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Reach Out Volunteers Charity (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for the review, I appreciate your feedback. I am in the process of updating the page. Just to confirm, where you have inserted "arrows" is that where you would like specific references.

Thank you again,

Request on 04:19:56, 11 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by LW1588

LW1588 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kirk Ke Wang (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for the review. I read the "Notability" guideline and thought that my article meets the criteria, including a national art competition winner (bronze medal out of 1.2 billion place), substantial coverage (newspapers, magazine, WEDU-Arts Plus, a PBS series, museum art shows, etc.) and a creative professional.

Please clarify third party sources. Your help is greatly appreciated!LW1588 (talk) 04:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LW1588 (talk) 04:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 04:38:57, 11 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Cluetrekk

Cluetrekk (talk · contribs)
- Draft:New Swears (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for the review SwisterTwister, I had tried to submit a page on the New Swears and it was rejected twice for the same reasoning despite ensuring that the criteria were met. Effort was made to capture the bands notability i.e. 2 albums on independent lables, independent reviews, performed in world renowned events, international concerts, etc. I tried to make every single statement verifiable by at least one entirely independent reference so that all references were verifiable and support the bands notability..

Can you please clarify where the page needs improvement. Thank you very much, Mark

Cluetrekk (talk) 04:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mika Toba notability

Hi, you turned down the Draft:Mika Toba with the following reason: "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia."

But... there's 5 references, including 3 articles specifically about her and her art in Japanese national dailies, plus the VietNamNet source (which isn't a source I'm familiar with) and the magazine in-depth interview. I don't see what more you could ask of when the notability article plainly states "they [should]have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." 126.59.94.42 (talk) 06:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

126.59.94.42 Yes but the current amount of sourcing is simply not enough to fully confirm it as an article and ensuring safety from deletion attempts by others who may question its notability. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 06:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:35:56, 11 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by ThalionSES

ThalionSES (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Verigreen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

We released Verigreen to promote the usage of gated check-in (commit) concept in the development industry. I'm struggling with which additional verifiable citations you require - I've added citations from Microsoft, JetBrains and Jenkins CI (CloudBees), all concerning the gated check-in concept. We're a tool promoting this way of developing code. How is that different from any other 3rd party tool (especially open-source ones) that are on Wikipedia? How is that different from Git, Jenkins, Docker or any other such tool already present in Wikipedia? I feel this is kind of a chicken and an egg - to raise awareness we need more sources. To get more sources, we need to raise awareness. I think Wikipedia is a good platform to raise the awareness and even a discussion (by editing) of the concepts.

I would really appreciate some pointers into which kind of citations would be acceptable.

Thanks in advance!

ThalionSES (talk) 06:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand ThalionSES but for the article to be fully confirmable as an article and safe from any deletion attempts questioning notability, the sourcing needs to be more adequate (six (6) is acceptable sometimes but in this case, it may need some more). Cheers,

SwisterTwister talk 06:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:50:14, 11 November 2015 review of submission by Sjscott80

Sjscott80 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Logz.io (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! I just wanted to say thank you for taking the time to review my draft of Logz.io. I'm sure you get a lot of angry messages from people asking, "Why was my draft rejected?!" -- this is definitely not one of them. :)

I was just curious because I looked at the Wikipedia page of Loggly, another company in the industry, and the length of the content and the number and quality of the sources were similar. So, is there another way that I could improve the article?

Thanks in advance for any guidance!

Quick question

I see you review a lot of the articles I create so thought I would check with you first for some advice. I was reviewing an article and thought it to be a content fork so I looked further. I discovered the article was created by an editor who also created two other articles that could also possibly be considered content forks as there is already an article they could be included in. Once thing that is common to all three articles is there is a link to the same website in all three. The website is a local business that is no where near a reliable source. Is it common for people to create articles simply to try to gain a backlink from Wikipedia or it more common that people go to articles already created to add a link? --CNMall41 (talk) 10:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Simply curious, what article is it CNMall41? SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thought it best to email. First, I don't want to make the user feel like they are being watched, if in fact they are good faith edits. Second, I don't trust editors who will read it here and destroy the articles just because of my "suspicion." --CNMall41 (talk) 17:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, SwisterTwister. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

11:22:55, 11 November 2015 review of submission by ThalionSES

ThalionSES (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Verigreen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

I've upped the references to twelve (12). Are those enough to make the re-review work and accepted?

Much appreciated,

ThalionSES (talk) 11:22, 11 November 2015 (UTC)ThalionSES[reply]

Thanks ThalionSES, however, I'm still concerned with its current how-to guide tone. Is there someway to change it to a more encyclopedia nature? Adding any more information about it aside from how to use would be welcome. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really struggling here. I've watched how Chef (software) or Puppet (software) pages are formatted (for example) and they look the same. I don't think I put a single 'how-to' reference in the article - this is not its intent. I'm merely explaining what it does, not how-to (that's what the external website is for). Would really appreciate specific pointers I can work with. Thanks! ThalionSES (talk) 09:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12:26:33, 11 November 2015 review of submission by Nmacs77

Nmacs77 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ronnie Woo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Thank you for the reply. There are other sources for this individual, such as some print magazine articles and mentions, but not sure how to site those sources. Also, could you be more specific about what kind of general "available coverage overall" you mean? I think I'm confused on what else needs to be included in order for this article to accepted. If you could tell me what other articles need to be included I could search for those specifically. Thank you for your help. :)

Nmacs77, you can list offline sources exactly like the others if the same information (titles, dates, etc.) are available. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:09:13, 11 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Eleda249

Eleda249 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sedona Canada Principles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This submission is not on the organization Sedona Conference. or the working group sedona canada 7. it is on the principles that are being introduced into the canadian legal system and referred to repeatedly in legal resources. Please reconsider. This is for a class project due 12.11.2015 Eleda249 (talk) 13:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)eleda249[reply]

Eleda249 (talk) 13:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eleda249, the article looks good but still needs any more available sources for weight and depth. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vital Danza rejection

Hi David,

I am very new to wikipedia and I would like to know why my article doesn't reach the general guidelines of notability. I was wondering how I could use my sources better as well. I don't have many sources in english, my subject has been covered more in finland, Japan and spain. I have a reference from a news programme in the Canary islands as well. Can I use citations from there? or do they have to be printed sources? Anyway, I just need some general advice for my article as there is so much information to swallow on the website. I feel a bit lost. I would really love for my first article to be on the wikipedia. Thank you so much for your help.

Marie.Michele.Tessier (talk) 13:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marie.Michele.Tessier, you can list non-English sources exactly like the English ones. The article simply needs any more available sources overall. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

How many more would I need? I've added one more. What would be a respectable amount of articles for it to fit the guidelines? I see other wikipedia articles with no more articles than mine. I'm sorry for having so many questions. Thanks so much for your help it is very appreciated!Marie.Michele.Tessier (talk) 15:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:46:55, 11 November 2015 review of submission by Mlnielson91

Mlnielson91 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Uptake (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I added additional references from article published in the Harvard Business Review, Chicago Tribune, Dow Jones Venturewire and Built in Chicago. I also added an award won by the company and references the award's winner's announcement.

The article looks good Mlnielson91 but I'm simply not convinced it meets companies notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:39:26, 11 November 2015 review of submission by LoveLarry1234

LoveLarry1234 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Christopher Bevans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not requesting a re-review, just need some direction :)

HI Swister Twister!

Thanks for helping. I included many citations, what else should I include? Are you saying I should cite more articles that directly correlate to Christopher Bevans and his work? Thanks!

Yes LoveLarry1234. SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:41:38, 11 November 2015 review of submission by RRamakr6

RRamakr6 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Wavelets for multidimensional signal analysis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I was asked as to why a separate article is necessary when there are pages on multidimensional signal processing and wavelets. I have a couple of things to say in this regard: From wikipedia, there are also different pages on all different types of wavelet transforms (CWT, DWT). I wanted to put them all together for the multidimensional case because they are more closely related and one is necessary to explain another. Also, there is the new technique of Hypercomplex wavelet transform for multidimensional signals. Research is still active in that field and there is not a lot I could write about it in the encyclopedic format in a totally other article.

I could also provide more sources for this but I do strongly believe that a new article is necessary.

Thank you for feedback regarding page for DBMaestro

i have added additional independent sources for coverage and further explained why what the company does is notable Nerminsaleemi (talk) 19:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm LaMona. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Classroom Assessment Techniques, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. LaMona (talk) 01:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 02:58:46, 12 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by LW1588

LW1588 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kirk Ke Wang (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Read your second comment. Will work on the references. Thank you for the help.LW1588 (talk) 02:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LW1588 (talk) 02:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussions at WP:NCOMPANY

Since I've noticed you are quite active in deletion discussions, including about companies, you may want to review some proposed changes at the talk of WP:NCOMPANY. More input is always welcome. Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

05:56:51, 12 November 2015 review of submission by 206.16.17.150

206.16.17.150 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:MuchTV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Could you help me finish this. How can I make it proper? 206.16.17.150 (talk) 05:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:20:06, 12 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Chirayu81

Chirayu81 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Daniel Fernandes (Comedian) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The person about whom the article is about is famous. I have cited various news paper articles about his work. He has done various shows for reputed companies and international festivals. I am unable to understand why is he not notifiable enough? Please help. Also this page was initially created and was up without any issues. But just because another user whose account was later blocked was associated with this page, this page was deleted. The second time i uploaded it, the reasons stated were that there were no references, now that there are references, the person is not notifiable enough.

Please help.

Chirayu81 (talk) 07:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12:45:42, 12 November 2015 review of submission by Marie.Michele.Tessier

Marie.Michele.Tessier (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Vital Danza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi!

I<ve added a direct citation from a magazine. These sources are the only ones I have, do you reckon it's not enough or would it be enough for me to just add some citations from the articles I have? Thanks for the help. Cheers.

Marie.Michele.Tessier (talk) 12:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:14:43, 12 November 2015 review of submission by VirginiaWagner

VirginiaWagner (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Andrew Ondrejcak (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, it's my first time editing and creating a page on Wikipedia and in response to the reasons for my page's decline I'm requesting help with wiki URLs: "note Wikipedia links are not used as references in themselves (instead, please use links about that with [[ ]] with the text in between those brackets, i.e. Arts)."

Currently I have this: ^[1]

Is it suppose to be this? ^[2]

or this? ^[3]

References

^ "Inigo Jones". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ [Inigo_Jones "Inigo Jones"]. {{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ {{Cite Inigo_Jones }}

19:49:32, 12 November 2015 review of submission by Tho2009

Tho2009 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Electric Jukebox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi David, Thanks for your feedback - I've now significantly and expanded the article and included references/citations to the Electric Jukebox articles in line with your last request. Let me know if this is now good to go.

Many thanks, Tim. Tho2009 (talk) 19:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Electric Jukebox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Electric Jukebox. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 20:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User:Revhall/sandbox

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Revhall/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 only applies to articles. G11 does not apply to userspace pages which have been blanked by the user. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Global Change Information System

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Global Change Information System, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:45:36, 13 November 2015 review of submission by MountainPleasure

MountainPleasure (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mountain Pleasure Horse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you tell me specifically which references you are referring to? There are no other references other than the ones I have used. Is it just that I need to list or name them differently?

01:51:44, 13 November 2015 review of submission by MountainPleasure

MountainPleasure (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mountain Pleasure Horse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

First, I would like to thank you for reviewing my entry. I am confused about what I need to do to correctly reference this article. I have included all available references so adding additional references is not an option. Is this just a matter of naming the references differently? Is it an issue of formatting? I have referenced the Mountain Pleasure Horse Association website several times. Should I instead repeat the same reference so that my current references 1-3 all be cited as reference 1? MountainPleasure (talk) 01:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 02:27:51, 13 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Whitenoise7633

Whitenoise7633 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Brainstems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The Brainstems band wiki I created was denied. How can I improve this article for submission? Is there a specific number of relevant news posts/press it would need?

Thanks. Whitenoise7633 (talk) 02:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aishwarya Trust Article

Hi SwisterTwister,

I have added all the references I had from the media coverage that Aishwarya Trust has received over the years. If you look at them, they are articles from reputed news outlets in India (The Times of India, The Hindu, Deccan Herald, Deccan Chronicle, Indian Express etc.) which back up the facts stated in the article. Could you please clarify exactly what you are looking for?

Vinod.chandrasekaran (talk) 03:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07:15:39, 13 November 2015 review of submission by Jimv391

Jimv391 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:FlightSite (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister. Could you tell me how many references I need for the article to be accepted? Which parts of the article lack references? Are there references that I am currently using that is not regarded as a good reference? Thanks.

Jimv391 Simply add any more available ones there are overall. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:26:11, 13 November 2015 review of submission by Webreaper

Webreaper (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Corran Purdon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, I've added a number of links to articles on Maj Gen Purdon, including BBC articles, the Times, and BBC Radio Ulster interviews. Maj Gen Purdon has a very long and notable life story, but I'm not a military historian - my intention is to get the basic page up and running and then engage with military historians to get the other details of his exploits documented. Is that a reasonable approach?

This is my first Wikipedia page, so if you have any other suggestions I'd gratefully accept them.

09:04:17, 13 November 2015 review of submission by 89.197.37.38

89.197.37.38 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Carspring (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

I was just wondering if there are any specific parts of the article that are in need of third party referencing.

Alternatively, could I just take certain sections out?

Request on 09:35:47, 13 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Sjscott80

Sjscott80 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Logz.io (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! At your request, I have added more authoritative third-party sources to Logz.io and will resubmit the article now. Thanks for the help!

Sjscott80 (talk) 09:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gill Fielding - Notability

Thank you for your attention to my proposed article for Gill Fielding. I have taken into consideration your comments and added a further two independent sources. One is from the Telegraph, featuring a preview of the television programme for which Gill is mainly known. I hope that, together with the existing Times and BBC references that this will be enough to establish notability. I have also added an additional reference from a local newspaper (The Worthing Herald). I hope that the fact that she is respected by that local news outlet as an expert in the field will add weight to my case for Gill's notability. I will resubmit shortly. If you feel this is still not enough, please would you give me some advice. If it is purely a case of numbers I'm sure I can trawl for a few more sources but if it's something else please let me know and I will address it. Thanks again. Neilho (talk) 12:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13:16:34, 13 November 2015 review of submission by 79.126.177.41

79.126.177.41 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Yane Sandanski and the Macedonian nationalism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Well, the article is sourced about every detail, and the sources are reliable, I believe. There are both primary and secondary, academic sources. Now, there are references in Macedonian, Greek and Bulgarian, but I believe that’s not the problem, is it? Because there are a few in English too, and links are provided. Can you tell me concretely what’s the problem? 79.126.177.41 (talk) 13:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC Barnstar

		The Articles for Creation barnstar
		For your tireless efforts at AfC. While we may not always see eye to eye, your work is noticed and appreciated. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Ya sh ! 15:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Accessible India Campaign submission

As you pointed out, I have added more information in the article that is relevant too. Please look into that and let me know if any new additions are required or the article is acceptable now? _Thanks. hey_pal (Friend.hey)^(talk) 14:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:54:28, 13 November 2015 review of submission by Hjohns89

Hjohns89 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Yvonne Healy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello there! I am hoping to get a better idea of what I'd need to do to provide enough sources for the page for Yvonne Healy I've been working on. My instinct is not to overwhelm the entry with a number of redundant articles, but I certainly can cite more articles that back up the information. (It is my first time working on Wikipedia so I appreciate all help/time/criticism very much)

Also, as a point of curiosity, this wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Rocha is the one that I started out using as a sample, given the shared profession, so I just wonder how that article passed but mine doesn't.

Thanks again! Hjohns89 (talk) 16:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Hjohns89[reply]

Concerning the submition of Max L. Lacayo page

I believe Max L. Lacayo is a notable writer because he has been featured in Newspaper article in the most prestigious Nicaraguan newspaper La Prensa. His books have been presented at the Nicaraguan Institute of Hispanic Culture Organization sponsored by the government of Spain. A video of that presentation was uploaded to youtube by a former president of Nicaragua Enrique Bolanos as you can see in reference number 7. The international journalist and writer María Lourdes Pallais has reviewed his book in La Prensa as you can see in reference number 8. In other references you can see article written about Max L. Lacayo and his work.

I appreciate you assistance.

Crystalnatalie Crystalnatalie (talk • contribs) 01:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Emile Rey

Hi David. Thanks for your efforts in reviewing articles, and for your feedback on my latest contribution via WP:AfC. As you'll have seen on the talk page, Emile Rey already has articles on Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and Spanish Wikipedia, albeit less well cited than this one. Following your concerns, I decided to delete those first ascents where I had myself added {{cn}} tags. With these temporarily removed, I suggest the article now better shows the WP:N of this person, and requires no further citations to support this. With a statue erected to his mountaineering achievements, and a major geographic feature in the Alps named after him, and with major first ascents of virgin alpine summits, he is far more significant than many lesser modern mountaineers who have articles based on just one or two new climbing routes. A search on his name within Wikipedia is itself quite revealing. I think the secondary sources I have cited do already demonstrate his wider recognition. The talk page also lists the further contributions I plan to make once this article goes into mainspace. I'd appreciate your further thoughts on this. Regards Parkywiki (talk) 01:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha looks like we tried patrolling at the same time

Right as I added a orphan tag to a page that was unpatrolled it said it was patrolled by you lol-just found that amusing! Wgolf (talk) 03:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfD rationales

Hi there,

In closing a bunch of backlogged AfDs, I've noticed that your "delete" rationales are usually something along the lines of "I don't see anything better". I'm not entirely sure what that means. I haven't encountered any discussions where one vote would have made the difference, but I think it might help the closing admins if you were to elaborate on your thoughts just a bit. Many thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Laursen

I have made suggested changes to the page for John Laursen (Sports), including more 3rd party references as suggested. Just wanted to touch base and see what else is needed in order to get my page published as you said in the last note that it "lmost satisfy sportspeople guidelines."

Thanks for the ongoing help getting everything in order! Draft:John_Laursen

Spider19880128 (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

G2s on sandboxes

Heya, I noticed you tagged a few sandbox drafts as G2/tests. The sandbox is a place for making tests, so my advice in those situations would be to either decline the submission as a test or simply remove the submit tags. There's not much point in deleting it, and may be overly BITEy to some folks, causing them to not come back for fear of having their pages deleted. Cheers, Primefac (talk) 07:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haha I suppose Primefac but I've also seen some of these which were basicaly vandalism such as Draft:Lucas Fields, only containing that he was the awesomest ever. One way or another, these may be single purpose accounts and there's nothing much to suggest keeping that (aside from simple testing I suppose). Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 07:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:46:51, 14 November 2015 review of submission by Vectormaxx323

Vectormaxx323 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Blank Banshee (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am requesting a re-review because the article is perfectly legitimate and contains valid and credible sources, independent of the artist, for all information contained within it.

FYI: This is a sockpuppet whose been pushing his or her agenda in two separate articles here - the one given above in the daft and over at vaporwave if I recall correctly. I've axed the draft and blocked the account, if you have any questions you can scope out Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/0000001Ghost or drop me a line on my talk page. TomStar81 (Talk) 17:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan

You have declined my submission with a reason that "the references do not adequately show the subject's notability".

I am very frustrated.I dont know what type of notability is required on wikipedia.I have provided all the string references.

Example:

1). Mufti Muhammad Akhtar Raza Khan Qaadiri Al-Azhari themuslim500.com

2). http://timesofindia.com/city/bareilly/Barelvi-cleric-in-most-powerful-Muslims-list/articleshow/44890599.cms

Morever all the claims are supported by these references.

What type of notability I have to show?

He is regarded as the Grand Mufti of India by the Sunni-barelvi Muslims,^[1]^[2] the majority of Indian subcontinent Muslims.^[3]^[4]

^ Barelvi school views SC fatwa order with caution Mrigank Tiwari,TNN | Jul 8, 2014, 09.41PM "Ala Hazrat's descendent Maulana Akhtar Raza Khan is the head of muftis across the country."
^ Mufti Muhammad Akhtar Raza Khan Qaadiri Al-Azhari themuslim500.com
^ [1] "Of them Barelvis are estimated to constitute between 80 to 85 % against 15 to 20 % Deobandis, 4% Ahle Hadith and Jamaat-e-Islami."
^ [2] "By one estimate, in Pakistan, the Shias are 18%, ismailis 2%, Ahmediyas 2%, Barelvis 50%, Deobandis 20%, Ahle Hadith 4%, and other minorities 4%".

Ejaz92 (talk) 17:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: The Crown of Ptolemy

Hi SwisterTwister. You requested my comment on the draft submitted by user Methychroma? I think it is acceptable. "Plot" section's a little long for my tastes, but that's not reason to decline submission. The only reason to decline would be a lacking reception section, which was not lacking (though I'm a little biased here, so please decide for yourself) until user Tokyogirl79's recent edits to the draft page removed several unreliable sources. Please see my post on the draft's talk page containing a new "Reception" section with justification. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source

Is this website a reliable source?--Vin09 (talk) 07:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vin09 Frankly I'm not familiar with that at all but simply from the appearance, it likely wouldn't be acceptable unless it can be shown it can be safely used. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Vin09 (talk) 07:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

4HANA Article

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you so much for reviewing and approving the SAP S/4HANA article. I truly appreciate it. However the correct title should be SAP S/4HANA and currently the title is shown as 4HANA. Would you please make this important edit? Thanks again! Olivia0452 (talk) 10:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Olivia0452[reply]

Help on Draft:Sarah Ellen Hay

Anna.urukova (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sarah Ellen Hay (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister....I would like to ask your help on improving Sarah Ellen Hay draft. I am newcomer and really need help. So please, I would be very grateful if you can help me. I have a suggestion regarding your comments...what if we position her more as ballet dancer and less as actress, because her primary occupation is professional ballet dancer. Will it help my draft to move to published article? I read all the articles about the notability etc. Anna.urukova (talk) 12:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of governors of Erbil

Hi , can you see this article and help me List of governors of Erbil

Thank you

Kurdistantolive (talk) 13:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13:28:58, 15 November 2015 review of submission by Power Forward

Power Forward (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Robert Charles McMaster (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You stated that my subject, an engineer who was known as the "grandfather of Nondestructive testing" with 19 patents, 300 technical papers and many inventions that changed human history was not noteworty. If this guy doen't rise to Wikipedia's standards noteworty-ness, who does then? I'm sorry but that's ridiculous. Please explain your thinking on this. Next, you weren't happy with the references. Why? They are verifiable. Please explain in detail.

15:03:12, 15 November 2015 review of submission by Ywangupeica

Ywangupeica (talk · contribs)
- User:Ywangupeica/Dew Computing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

15:06:36, 15 November 2015 review of submission by Ywangupeica

Ywangupeica (talk · contribs)
- User:Ywangupeica/Dew Computing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for reviewing my submission. In my understanding, you are mainly concerned about no multiple third-party reliable sources. On top of the references listed in the draft, over 30 scientific media published such information. You can find them on dewcomputing.org. These are all third-part reliable sources. Another point I hope you can consider: This article is not about websites or web content, it is about a computer science structure. Please reconsider and tell me your decision. Thanks.

06:29:53, 16 November 2015 review of submission by Baratrod

Baratrod (talk · contribs)
- User:Baratrod/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I gather that my submission was rejected because the subject was not notable enough. What can be more notable for a British artist other than to have paintings accepted by the Royal Society of Portrait painters on two consecutive years, and also to have a painting reproduced in a book on British Marine Artists?

What higher achievements are possible?

What should I do to represent his life?

I can take photos of his work through his career and in fact intended including selected ones, particularly the entry in the book, but presumed that the text should be established first.

Please advise.

Well Baratrod, the article certainly needs any more available sources overall and I'm also simply not sure if it satisfies artists notability guidelines. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:58:21, 16 November 2015 review of submission by 198.182.52.26

198.182.52.26 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Aishwarya Trust (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thanks for taking the time to review the article.

Could you please let me know exactly what you are looking for in terms of third party sources? I have included plenty of references from newspaper/magazine articles. Could you point out which statements you think are not sufficiently sourced? Maybe for the first draft, I can take those parts out. I assure you that it is a completely legitimate organization, and getting this article published would be a great help to us in our mission to spread awareness about the cause.

Request on 10:31:49, 16 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Anna.urukova

Anna.urukova (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sarah Ellen Hay (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Swister Twister,

Could you please have a look at this existing article about ballerina Irina Dvorovenko (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irina_Dvorovenko)? If you have a look at the sources, they are not much different from mine (which you consider not reliable to comply with actors guidelines). And Sarah Hay in my eyes is as notable as Irina Dvorovenko. So why Irina Dvorovenko wiki page exists and Sarah Hay's is not? Also considering the sources in this article about the series themselves...I don't see how sources here are more reliable than mine? However, this article was given a green light...PLEASE, MAKE IT CLEAR FOR ME! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesh_and_Bone_(miniseries)Anna.urukova (talk) 10:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anna.urukova (talk) 10:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Need your help

Hi, I am new to Wikipedia and wrote an article draft Draft:Akshay_Agrawal which you rejected on grounds of being not notable enough. As I saw it, there were copious number of sources. Could you please help me understand what can be done to make it notable ?

Was it the quality of the sources or the quantity of the sources that was insufficient ?
Could you provide me a few examples incontext of person biographies that would make it notable ? Like would an article from a REALLY Famous blog do ?
Would something like a TEDx talk be counted notable? im really lost on what would count as notable in this SPECIFIC case.

Also, I wrote the article because there is another person named Siddharth_Shetty who has similar and almost comparable sources. So that is where i am not able to understand what was wrong. I think this is WP:Other Stuff Exists?

Looking forward to hearing from you and workin gto improve the article ? Cheers Agrawal.akshay98 (talk) 10:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SwisterTwister (talk · contribs), would appreciate if you could help me out. Cheers Agrawal.akshay98 (talk) 10:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:55:55, 16 November 2015 review of submission by Maddelamia

Maddelamia (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Osteoware (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, the draft for Osteoware has been denied again. It was denied on November 1st initially for only having two sources. I am confused as to why it was denied again, because it has 8 cited sources and 13 additional resources relevant to the subject. FORDISC is a related software used by biological anthropologists (specifically forensic anthropologists) and it has a Wikipedia page. Biological Anthropologists use both FORDISC and Osteoware together when studying skeletal remains. Osteoware is an essential software to the field of biological anthropology and is run by the Smithsonian. I am confused about why it wasn't accepted because the referencing is verifiable and has secondary sources. I really would like to get this topic approved by Wikipedia and have no personal involvement with Osteoware. This is the first article I have tried to create in Wikipedia. Please let me know exactly how I could improve this. Thank you, maddelamia

SAP S/4HANA article

Hi SwisterTwister, thank you for approving the SAP S/4HANA article. However, the article title is incorrect. It reads as "4HANA" The correct product name is "SAP S/4HANA" and I hope you can make this minor yet important edit. Thank you! Harper70 (talk) 17:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Harper70[reply]

17:21:11, 16 November 2015 review of submission by Xenith711

Xenith711 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Cloudcade (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, since your last comment, even more sources have been added to the references within the draft. Further, the game has now been released globally, accruing over 1million downloads worldwide. The Company as well as the Game have both won awards and contests in the gaming space since 2014 and have been building up a following across their social media channels. Given the latest info, I believe that both the Company as well as the Game are both Notable enough to meet the Wiki guidlines for warranting an article. The article is also very objectively, and clearly not meant for promotional purposes. Could you please kindly approve the article and make the draft live? Thanks!

18:31:42, 16 November 2015 review of submission by Hrboe

Hrboe (talk · contribs)
- Draft:BBGM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I've added some more significant references. I would also like some assistance if those do not turn out to be enough.

Hey David, Thanks for editing my BBGM draft. I was wondering if you could help me with some general issues I've been running into regarding displaying the company's noteworthiness? While I've edited some articles before, this is the first article I've ever created from scratch, so I'm still trying to get the hang of things. The biggest problem I've been experiencing is that even though the firm gets a large amount of coverage, most of it is about the company's architectural projects and not the company itself. For example, they were recently contracted to design the renovations for the Watergate Hotel. Obviously, the Watergate is a pretty a big deal, being both ultra high-luxury and historically significant, so they aren't just going to hire anyone to renovate it. They'd only hire a very well-known and highly-regarded company. All the news related to the topic, however, only focuses on how the Watergate is going to look when it's finished. And last year, Forbes dedicated an entire article to a suite they designed. Not even a hotel, a single suite! But unfortunately, other than trade journals, the news media isn't really all that interested in learning about the guys behind the scenes. BBGM is a big name in the architectural community, and their projects get a lot of media attention from big news sources like The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, etc.. It's just that the company itself isn't really in the public eye all that much. Because of this, it's not easy to fit news related to BBGM into a Wikipedia article about them. Any suggestions on ways I might be able to solve this problem? I'm thinking that maybe if I format the page differently, such as make the "significant projects" section paragraph-form instead of a list, I'll be able to make citations to articles about their projects work more easily within the context of the page. I thought I'd see if you had any suggestions before I tried it out though. Whatever the case, I've added a bunch more references to the page, including two references to Forbes and one to CNBC. I've also added a section about BBGM buildings that have been used as sets for movie. So please let me know if you think those would be enough. I now have more sources cited now than the pages of every other architecture firm in DC combined do. Literally.

Thanks,

Hrboe 18:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

PS: In case you haven't noticed already, it looks like someone mistakenly put a post at the very top of your User Talk page. Just thought I'd let you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrboe (talk • contribs) 20:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: After speaking to some other members at the Teahouse, I've come to realize that an architectural firm may be more suited to the notability guidelines of Creative Professionals (WP:AUTHOR), rather than those of organizations and companies (WP:CORP), as the "creative professionals" section directly mentions architects. Hrboe (talk) 22:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19:31:54, 16 November 2015 review of submission by Attichelper

Attichelper (talk · contribs)
- Draft:H. Lyman Saÿen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't know of any other sources that would be appropriate to cite at this time. Last week I went to Philadelphia to visit the Sketch Club. They may have more archival material and I have requested information from them. I am also going to verify that Jeannette Hope actually did work that was published in The North American...those materials are available at the Library of Congress. Once I get a chance to see these sources, I will add them.

Tasha Chiu speedy deletion

Hello,

I removed your CSD tag on Tasha Chiu. I think there is substantial doubt about whether this person is sufficiently notable to be in the encyclopedia, but it is not a clear-cut case - there is meaningful coverage of her by an independent source, and honestly even being a TV host in a significant market like Vancouver is probably a credible claim of significance in its own right. It therefore follows that the article is not appropriate for speedy deletion. I suggest taking it to AfD to find out what the community's view of local notability might be in a case such as this.

Cheers,

Thparkth (talk) 00:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasha Chiu DGG ( talk ) 17:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07:03:17, 17 November 2015 review of submission by MpMe2015

MpMe2015 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mauro Patricelli, musician (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE ERROR: [1] Cite error: A ^[1] (see the help page). [2][3][4] [5] [6] WHAT IS THIS I HAVE CHECKED THE BRACKETS.. they seemed to be closed..

MpMe2015 One of the first listed references at the top, the second one, was missing the last "/" with the <ref> (i.e. </ref> is used at the end for a reference). Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MpMe2015 Yes, what the article needs is better coverage meaning third-party sources such as news and magazine to at least satisfy musicians notability (or also general notability, basic and biographies (guidelines). Better third-party sources is especially important for establishing notability so add any available links. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MpMe2015 It's worth noting it's not necessary to resubmit another review at this page as I'll simply comment at the first one. The listed sources are not enough and needs any more available to satisfy general notability guidelines. If you need to respond, simply comment below here. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:54:05, 17 November 2015 review of submission by Pianogac

Pianogac (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Olga Jegunova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am left not really knowing what you want re the Olga Jegunova draft! Of the 12 references 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11 are 3rd part sources. Number 4 is YouTube but are you suggesting this is a fake video?! Number 9 is on her website but it does demonstrate that she had a master class with Andras Schiff, one of the most respected live classical pianists, unless you think this is a fake too! Number 12 is a YouTube video but is from a BBC production - surely the BBC can be accepted as an independent source?!

I really need detailed reasons why you reject this version or otherwise we are both wasting our time!

Help!

Thanks

Geoff Cox

Request on 11:04:12, 17 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Andershoghansen

Andershoghansen (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Eugene Haynes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SisterTwister. Thank you for your review of Eugene Haynes, a new entry by me (andershoghansen). You asked for more sources overall. However, it has over 10 sources already (and over 20 footnotes). Almost everything you can find on the internet plus additional material from the musuems and interview with curator has been used. The sources are also variedL; journalistic, museum-curatorial texts, letter and diary writing by Haynes himself, an obiturary, and other. I don't think the notability can be questioned. Can you be more specific about where you think sources are missings? Best wishes Anders

Andershoghansen (talk) 11:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:13:10, 17 November 2015 review of submission by Andershoghansen

Andershoghansen (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Eugene Haynes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi again SwisterTwister. I just wrote you and was curious about what other sources, for improving Eugene Haynes. Yet, I find some indications in the draft by you and others I think and have begun complementing the piece with further sources. So thanks again. Anders PS. I am not asking for a re-review or other reviewer, I will add sources and edit, resubmit and see what happens.

Request on 13:41:52, 17 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Ivan Mato

Ivan Mato (talk · contribs)
- Draft:NEXTEV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello SwisterTwister, thank you so much for your review of the NEXTEV Article. Still learning my way around wikipedia one step at at time! I have now looked at the guidelines for notability and properly referenced significant coverage in reliable, independent third party sources. I would be delighted to hear your feedback. Many thanks in advance. Ivan

Ivan Mato (talk) 13:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:25:49, 17 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Sonofpercy

Sonofpercy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:John Robert Wildman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for the feedback. I have read the Wikipedia advice that you have directed me to, but I am not sure that I can improve the article sufficiently to satisfy you from the sources currently available to me. I have used secondary sources – newspaper and magazine reviews and books – that are independent of the subject, but when you ask me to improve the submission’s referencing, I am not sure whether you are saying that there are insufficient secondary sources, or whether you are just saying that the citations are inadequate (or perhaps both). If the former, then I will try and find some more sources, but I don’t think that will be easy. If the latter then, having read the advice on citing sources, the only additions that appear to be needed are page numbers. These I can add, as I have copies of the relevant publications, but would that be sufficient? If it is not just page numbers, what more do the citations lack in order to make them verifiable? If the main reason for not accepting the article is that I have not demonstrated notability sufficiently, then – as I seem to have exhausted the reference sources available to me at the present time – I fear that I will have to abandon the submission for the time being. If so, what happens to the draft article? Does it get deleted, or does it remain on the Wikipedia web site as a draft article? If the latter, then I will carry on editing as new reference sources become available to me, although I will not resubmit unless substantial new sources appear. Sonofpercy (talk) 16:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC) Sonofpercy (talk) 16:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Barb Horse

Hi, I came across this article through WPEQ and I seriously doubt it's needed. We already have a fairly good article on Spanish Mustangs, which are basically the same thing. This kind of thing is ridiculously common in the horse world. Somebody likes a particular breed of horse but doesn't like the association that controls that breed, so they form their own association, changing the breed name to make it seem different... 😛 (See Kentucky Mountain Saddle Horse and Rocky Mountain Horse for a prime example.) Anyway, I was just going to say that even though I'm usually an inclusionist, I don't really want to see more articles like this because they are more trouble than they're worth. They get written by promoters who don't get that Wikipedia is not a commercial. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 20:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04:35:28, 18 November 2015 review of submission by Blessedtern2014

Blessedtern2014 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Alex Wyse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I'm confused about why nine third-party sources aren't enough to validate the page. This actor has appeared twice on Broadway, and is currently performing in the acclaimed Deaf West Spring Awakening Revival. What other references need to be added to validate this?

Blessedtern2014 I'm simply not sure if it satisfies actors and entertainers notability guidelines so please add any more available sources about him overall. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

If I need any help, I will be sure to ask here! Granolalover (talk) 07:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:11:21, 18 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by MpMe2015

MpMe2015 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mauro Patricelli, musician (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

THE ARTICLE HAS BEEN REJECTED - AND YET YOU WRITE IN THE GUIDELINES TAHT THE SUBJECT SHOULD MEET AT LEAST ONE of the following:

Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition- MAURO PATRICELLI HAS BEEN CREDITED AS HE RELEASED SEVERAL OPERAS, REFERENCES ON PAGE CONFRIM THIS! Has written musical theatre of some sort (includes musicals, operas, etc.) that was performed in a notable theatre that had a reasonable run as such things are judged in their particular situation and time. - MAURO PATRICELLI HAS RELEASED SEVERAL OPERAS, REFERENCES ON PAGE CONFRIM THIS!

MpMe2015 (talk) 08:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MpMe2015 Happenning to look in, one thing that would help is to remove the promotional language/ We describe, not praise. Another is to cite every item, as we do for bios of living people. A third is to remove the list of composers who have influenced him, unless there are third party sources for each one. And which ofhis works havereceived morethan a single performance? And which of his recordings have won prizes or even been reviewed? DGG ( talk ) 17:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:12:54, 18 November 2015 review of submission by Rkc1818

Rkc1818 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Yashar lachayal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi can you please give me a ballpark figure of how many more sources I need? And if there are any other issues with the page?

Rkc1818 Looking in, it's not just a question of how many , but that they need to be references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. What you have are mere listings. DGG ( talk ) 17:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:00:03, 18 November 2015 review of submission by Nittennair

Nittennair (talk · contribs)
- Draft:MuchTV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you for your review. It would be really helpful if you could let me know what more I can add to get this article approved. There are a few more articles for reference but they are in Arabic.Nittennair (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18 Nov 2015 review of submission by User:Sam Parsons 1981

Hello, I noticed that you declined the article Draft:Missrepresent for now on the grounds that it does not have enough independent sources. A user called YellowFig39 came into IRC asking about it, I assume it's the same person as User:Sam Parsons 1981. I decided to ask you to elaborate. Here are a list of domains where information is sourced from. The ones I regard as independent are marked in bold. The ones I doubt on sight I didn't mark as bold.

missrepresent.com
twitter.com (social network profile)
taipeitimes.com
soundcloud.com (music host of subject)
nicetalent.co.uk (booking site for artist among others)
mobygames.com
formationrecords.databeats.com (record label owned by others)
beatport.com (sells artist's music)
welovejungle.com
junodownload.com (currently malformed in the article, doesn't link to right search, does not back claim that subject runs Sliced Note Recordings)
dnbmuzik.com
facebook.com (National Drum and Bass Awards results 2012)
djmag.com
bbc.co.uk
scunthorpenights.co.uk
flavourmag.co.uk
pump-audio.com

Many of these also host interviews conducted and published by third party online newspapers and music enthusiast sites. It would be very helpful if you please elaborate on how many more independent sources this article needs. There seem to be a lot compared to the conventions on other articles. Thank you. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 11:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

pings

I don't bother with the ones whose result is obvious. I also try to find some that can be done via speedy. And since I was here , I decided to help a little. DGG ( talk ) 17:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:33:07, 18 November 2015 review of submission by P. Utopia

P. Utopia (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Women Help Women (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. The reason I am making this request is because if I compare the article I'm trying to submit to the article of Women On Web (that is an organisation that makes the exact same work as Women Help Women https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_on_Web) the page I'm trying to submit is more complete, with better citations and with more articles proving visibility. The used criteria doesn't seem to be the same. Thank you for your attention.

19:53:33, 18 November 2015 review of submission by 2601:480:8501:BA00:608A:5CAA:F471:B2F4

2601:480:8501:BA00:608A:5CAA:F471:B2F4 (talk · contribs)
- User:Matthewmbury/Steelism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey David, this is the first wikipedia page I've attempted to make so I'm hoping you can shed a little extra light for me. Has the page been rejected because I simply did not cite enough sources or is there a certain claim / language that needs to be revised? Any direction advice you can give me, would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance, 2601:480:8501:BA00:608A:5CAA:F471:B2F4 (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Connie Fournier Draft

Thanks for reviewing my submission at Draft:Connie_Fournier. I have cleaned up the draft so that the reference show better how she is notable. She is more of an activist than an author and I believe the references show she meets guidelines.

Some of these references have her by another name (Connie Wilkins). If it is possible to take a closer look at the article and let me know what, if anything, needs improved I would appreciate it. Thank you again for the original advice and I look forward to your comments. Thanks again. --Finnythedog (talk) 22:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Phillips (actress)

You may want to edit your remarks. You omitted a vital "non". Happens, I know! John from Idegon (talk) 22:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:25:17, 18 November 2015 review of submission by Avata666

Avata666 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Studienrat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Avata666 (talk) 22:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Thanks for you review and the comments![reply]

I made all the suggested changes and added a lot of official references. I got help from the live chat and got green light from there.

The title/rank of Studienrat is still a part of the Austrian and German Beamte System and a very important part of Austrian and German history. Even in movies or historic articles or official documents the rank/title of Studienrat is always mentioned.

A lot of foreign students get in contact with holders of the title/rank of Studienrat at University and trying to get informations about it. Adding this article will help understanding the German education system and history.

Stress measurement in aviation

You rejected it, the original author just moved it. I presume the next step would be an AFD?Naraht (talk) 22:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04:09:26, 19 November 2015 review of submission by APpagekeeper

APpagekeeper (talk · contribs)
- Draft:AP (Thailand) Plc. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Swister Twister. First of all, thank you for taking your time to review my article. However, I'm still not quite sure why my references are inadequate. I consider my cited sources are quite notable like Reuter, Bloomberg, Financial Times, and Bangkok Post (The most popular English newspaper in Thailand). Perhaps you can help clarify a bit more so that I can move forward in the right direction. Thank you so much.

APpagekeeper The article seems interesting and has potential but I'm simply not sure if there are enough sources to satisfy companies notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 04:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help with a Page Blanker

Sorry to disturb you, but we have been having some trouble with the Odinism page. The reasons are unclear, but one editor keeps trying to erase the entire page or make it disappear. (Also, she keeps attacking the people editing it). Any suggestions? Thanks. --Holtj (talk) 05:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am the editor in question, and must warn you that Holtj is being disingenous. I must point out that Holtj is under a sock puppet investigation, with one of their alleged socks, User:ThorLives, also being a persistent disruptive editor currently the subject of a community discussion regarding a topic ban. (Indeed, the Holtj account appears to have been re-activated to avoid the current scrutiny on the ThorLives account). This editor has created a travesty in the form of the Odinism article (replete with non-referenced information and non-reliably referenced information), all with the intent of creating a WP:Coatrack for the main Heathenry (new religious movement) article, which they are deeply unhappy with because it doesn't present the religion to which they subscribe in a way that they approve of. Their attempts to enlist you to their side in this debate reflects the fact that they have been unable to find support for their actions anywhere else. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Anyway, she keeps trying to blank the page (when she is not attacking editors.) Any suggestions? --Holtj (talk) 06:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Zpeopleheart. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Siege of Baghdad (1743), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Zpeopleheart (talk) 07:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review

@SwisterTwister:Chandrala, Mylavaram mandal you reviewed, but check its talk page once, it says Talk:Chandrala,_Near_Gudivada. It has some issues please wait for some time as it filed at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Chandrala.--Vin09 (talk) 08:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article mathdaybfmint.doc for review: I quote my another German source for my History form the Baden Wuerttemberg government: Quotation from the internet in http://www.landeswettbewerb-mathematik.de

email: hanspeter.eichhorn@landeswettbewerb-mathematik.de

https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Landeswettbewerb_Mathematik_Baden-W%C3%BCrttemberg&action=edit

Landeswettbewerb Mathematik Baden-Württemberg...

Geschichte

Die Struktur der Landeswettbewerbe richtet sich an den entsprechenden Bundeswettbewerben und an fachgebundenen Olympiaden für Schüler aus. Die Initiative zu den lokalen, süddeutschen Wettbewerben kam vom Tag der Mathematik, der seit 1985 in Baden-Württemberg an Universitäten stattfindet. Er wurde von MINT (Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften, Technik) an der Universität Ulm^[2] getragen, in Zusammenarbeit mit hessischen Veranstaltern. Außer dem eintägigen Wettbewerb werden in diesem Programm Sommerschulen oder Kurse^[3] mit Universitätsprofessoren oder -dozenten als Lehrer für Schüler aus der Region einer Universität angeboten. Die Schüler haben dabei die Möglichkeit, einen späteren Studienort kennenzulernen, ihr Talent mit Schülern anderer Schulen zu vergleichen und Freundschaften unter Gleichtalentierten zu schließen.

References

^ tag is missing the closing
^ Gudrun Kalmbach: Tag der Mathematik. Begleithefte, Universität Ulm, 1985–2002
^ Tagungsbände 1-27 zu MINT (Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften, Technik). (herausgegeben mit dem Editorial Board: O. Baumgärtner, R. Berger, W. Brübach, A. Dvurecenskij, M. Grimm, O. Grosek, W. Hauptvogel, P. Hitzler, F. Houdek, V. Janis, G. Kalmbach, F. J. Klingen, O. Lange, B. Riecan, Z. Riecanova), Aegis-Verlag, Ulm und MINT Verlag, Bad Wörishofen 1997–2013

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Swpb. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, List of WWE double champions, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. —Swpb^talk 15:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:27:16, 19 November 2015 review of submission by NMSWizard

NMSWizard (talk · contribs)
- Draft:CirrusPoint (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have added another reference for CirrusPoint from linked in and I noticed that it mentions no images found. but when I click on Cirruspoint I see the CirrusPoint logo shown multiple times?

Woodcraft Supply draft

Is there anything that can be added to help prove notability and make this draft page go live? WinCo Foods is a similar size chain to Draft:Woodcraft_Supply, however, there are many more sources referencing Woodcraft stores or magazine, including some larger publications such as The New York Times. In addition to the US stores, the magazine and catalog give Woodcraft an international footprint across 117 countries. Woodcraft is certainly notable within the woodworking industry and for hobbyists. In that context it seems odd that it is not already included in Wikipedia (I suppose there may not be a big cross-over of woodworking enthusiasts and Wikipedia contributors). Atsmith227 (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:42:35, 19 November 2015 review of submission by LG Brichetto

LG Brichetto (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Parables TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

SwisterTwister. I have improved the Parables TV Network article and added more sources and their logo. The logo was uploaded with Wikipedia's copywrite permission template completed and emailed to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. It may still be pending review. Can you please review the article and advise if it's good to go, or do you want me to do more work on it? Thanks very much. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Parables_TV LG Brichetto (talk) 22:42, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19 Nov review of submission by T McNellis on Kami Lyle

Thanks for the quick review, David, and I have spent some time looking through (again) the notability guidelines as well as the GNG. I'm admittedly a newbie when it comes to this, and the extensive thought that went into creating the guidelines is very interesting and thought provoking, but I readily welcome your help and guidance. Realizing now that notability is not merely a popularity contest (i.e. sheer number of references) I took a hard look at the quality of the references and am in the process of pulling out references that are weak, and adding more independent references. In general, is there a rule of thumb for a musician regarding selection of the type and quantity of references? Tmcnellis15 (talk) 02:44, 20 November 2015 (UTC) Tmcnellis15 (talk) 02:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tmcnellis15 Not particularly, simply bands and musicians notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 03:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... I've made the updates after spending some time reviewing additional sources. Let me know if you think I over-did it (i.e. too much quantity)! Tmcnellis15 (talk) 04:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you gave me an interesting challenge and in the process I was able to improve my skills in literature and new searches! I’ve included a bunch of additional third party references to give a more varied and global view of this artist. In keeping with the wikipedia guidelines, I’ve tried to include only reliable sources and have removed questionable ones like examiner.com. Overall for notability, here’s what I think I’m seeing for this artist: subject of multiple published works (Encyclopedia of Popular Music 4th Edition, numerous articles in Billboard, NPR, national press); plus two full length albums (although one is independently produced) but there are several others on significant labels where she is credited as composer and performer of one of the tracks; significant activity with national artists and national media on major networks; and won several awards in what I believe are national songwriting contests. Hope this helps…. Tmcnellis15 (talk) 07:28, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:26:19, 20 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Rburtonresearch

Rburtonresearch (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Elements of Sound (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi. The submission of my draft of "The Elements of Sound" has been declined with the message "This looks more like a journal report rather than a formal encyclopaedia article". I would appreciate it if you would advise me of how to turn it into an encyclopaedia article. Should I use the same format as "the elements of Art"? Is there a different model I should use?

Is there something wrong with the information? I can assure you it is well researched.

Perhaps the use of the expression of "the elements" needs to be elaborated and differentiated between definitions of rudimentary elements and perceptual elements. The intent is to identify a list of discrete elements of sound which are both comprehensive (make up all forms of sound) and can be independently manipulated.

Similar definitions can be found in a variety of areas:

law: element of a crime (or element of an offense) is one of a set of facts that must all be proven to convict a defendant of a crime

Chemical element, a pure substance consisting of one type of atom in mathematics, an element, or member, of a set is any one of the distinct objects that make up that set. in philosophy Classical elements, the ancient belief about the fundamental types of matter (usually four in number), expressed in their Aristotelian forms as fire, earth, air, and water Rburtonresearch (talk) 07:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rburtonresearch (talk) 07:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rburtonresearch If you want you can base it from elements of art but also feel welcome and encouraged to make even better than that, I would suggest seeing WP:Writing better articles and WP:Your first article which has some helpful information and also simply overall making the current draft better. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 07:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions. I will look at all of them and revise over the next couple of weeks. Rburtonresearch (talk) 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:07:56, 20 November 2015 review of submission by 192.77.239.241

192.77.239.241 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Michael Chou (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi David,

Just wanted to check in as I added several new sources. Please let me know if you can go ahead and approve. Thanks!

Best, Grace

08:22:19, 20 November 2015 review of submission by 192.77.239.241

192.77.239.241 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Michael Chou (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi David,

I've added several highly reputable sources including Bloomberg, Princeton University, Thomson Reuters, Fortune Magazine, and The Washington Post.

Best, Grace

08:25:43, 20 November 2015 review of submission by Jmsieber

Jmsieber (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Hans Danuser (artist) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello

Thank you for your review. I don't understand why the sources www.sikart.ch which is a scientific portal of the SIK-ISEA, the international recognized swiss institute for art research shouldn't be a reliable source. The same goes to the Fotostiftung Schweiz (www.fotostiftung.ch). Can you explain me that? I found several swiss photographers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Swiss_photographers) which do have the same reliable sources and are published since long ago in the EN-wikipedia. How could this happen? Did the criteria chance? Concerning the notability of the photographer: He won several times the Swiss Art Award (1974, 1976, 1983, 1985), did more than one Art Stipend in the States and elsewhere and got exhibitions in the States (like New Museum, NY), Germany, France, Belgium, Italy (Biennial of Venice), and Switzerland.

Thank you for your support.

Kind regards

Joachim

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule.

I wasn't actually emphasizing about that, I was emphasizing the need for any more available third-party sources overall. Cheers Jmsieber, SwisterTwister talk 08:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:08:13, 20 November 2015 review of submission by MountainPleasure

MountainPleasure (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mountain Pleasure Horse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing my article. I am asking that you accept the article with the references I have listed. I am quite certain that any other references I could possibly locate would be either unreliable in regards to accuracy or simply copied from the sources I have listed. I am referring to the MPHA website in particular as it is the official online site of the Mountain Pleasure Horse breed association and is maintained by individuals committed to accurately presenting historic and current events pertaining to the breed. The non-url references are taken from vintage publications which are few and difficult to come by. In writing this article, I have attempted to locate and reference all known documentation in order to write a complete and accurate article and I do hope Wikipedia will accept it as written. Thank you so much for your time and consideration.MountainPleasure (talk) 11:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hadyn Ellis

You declined the new page about the academic Draft:Hadyn Ellis on the grounds of not being a notable person. He was an academic and this is what the notable guidelines say about academics: Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Of the critieria listed he meets at least 4 of them.

Further: He even has a building named after him - surely that is a sufficient secondary source. He coined a term which is now a major sub discipline of psychology.

Does this make him sufficiently notable?Psy7k (talk) 11:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your constant page reviewing! :) RugbyXIII (talk) 12:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cenduit Page Review 11/20

Hi. Thank you for reviewing my submission for the Draft: Cenduit page. I was wondering what exactly needed to be done for the article to be published. Did you mean that there needed to be more sources for the article? Thank you Cenduitllc (talk) 17:54, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stress measurement in aviation

I think the fate of that article was the result of a series of misunderstandings and mistakes (as you can see from the article's history). I propose returning the article to the student's userspace, and making sure that they understand how they should proceed (ie, don't move it to mainspace in this state). I wanted to clear it with you, as the nominator, that userfying it was an acceptable outcome. Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Martineck

Hey, just wanted to follow up on the Sophia Martineck page. Was there one source in particular that should be replaced? I have a few more that I could substitute. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdhambro (talk • contribs) 17:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cloudcade

Hi! What else can I do on the Draft: Cloudcade to get a submission approval? There are no more additional sources at this time in English that I can find. The Company is mostly substantiated by its products which is notable and well referenced all across the internet. Can you please kindly approve this draft? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.212.36.2 (talk) 20:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Envision Energy Draft

Hi! Our company page has been declined again Draft: Envision Energy, in which you said we need more third-party sources. How many more do you need? There isn't a lot of media coverage online about our business, since we are in a traditional B2B industry with a lot of things happening offline. As our main operation is based in China, there are more sources in Chinese, but limited amount in English. Would it be alright if we include some sources in Chinese? Thank you. Windeditor123880 (talk) 21:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Windeditor123880, however many are there available including that they're enough for companies notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 21:54, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23:46:55, 20 November 2015 review of submission by Meafisher

Meafisher (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mea Fisher (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Just curious why i can't get my page published. This is the second time I have been denied, I have done everything i can think of to make this go live and i am completely stumped as to what the problem is. Please help! What do I need to do???

02:08:32, 21 November 2015 review of submission by Stormnews89

Stormnews89 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Life Matters Media (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I appreciate your feedback on my latest submission. I worked with other users to remedy the page and hopefully get it accepted. I like love for you to please take another look. I linked to mostly articles by major news organizations and took out "peacock" language.

Stormnews89 (talk) 02:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04:32:36, 21 November 2015 review of submission by C toney

C toney (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mongabay.org (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your comments and taking the time to review my submission. I added additional third party source to demonstrate notability. Mongabay's websites draw almost 3 million visitors a month, while the organization has over 200 correspondents, translators, and staff, so it significant entity. Thanks for reconsidering.

Mosaic451

Thank you for reviewing my article on Mosaic451. I am a little disappointed that it didn't make it this time especially since the company has achieved a top 10 rating by CSO Outlook magazine and has been recognized in The Channel Company's exclusive 2015 CRN[R] Next-Gen 250 list. Can you suggest further areas where it might achieve the notability required? Nmwalsh (talk) 12:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confused Regarding Rejection of Submission

Thank you for taking the time to read my submission for a Wikipedia article. The feedback I received for rejection was due to the subject not being notable enough for inclusion. The subject's bands are extremely popular, they are currently performing in sold out arenas, one of the subject's bands has their own Wikipedia article already, which references this subject. Another band member also has his own Wikipedia page. The subject is endorsed by a major drum manufacturing company, the subject's albums are available for download on iTunes, etc. Many other bands/band members related to the subject are also widely available on Wikipedia. All of this information has been referenced in the article I submitted. If the issue is improper referencing I'm happy to oblige if you would be more specific about what the concern is. Simply saying the subject is not notable enough doesn't quite seem to fit the bill. The subject is all over YouTube, has been interviewed for Natural High, performed at Warped Tour. The subject's achievements are more than notable. Less notable individuals have articles of their own. Would you please clarify further what is considered notable if this individual does not fit the bill?

ALLB0808123 (talk) 17:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC) ALLB0808123[reply]

Tenth Church draft

Thanks for the feedback on Draft: Tenth Church: The comment regarding "depth of coverage" crystallizes for me the issues with this entry about an otherwise notable organization, even with two major independent sources and national media coverage. I'll see what other third-party commentary on the organization exists, if any!

Columbiensis (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

journlists

I have no special expertise in this area. And in areas where I do, the optimal time for me to look is to help prevent a no-consensus or relisting, not at the start. ``

DGG I agree and understand but you know I always welcome you to comment at my AfDs (especially the ones with fields you're familiar with and since you can't keep track of all noms).

BTW, I noticed you edited Woolrich a few minutes, what lead you to that article? (I ask because I participated heavily with improving and regularly visit it to see if all is well). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had listed it for editing some time ago--possibly because you'd worked on it restoring some promotional cuts --I didn't remember what I intended, but I was trying to clear out some of my backlist & I made one of my usual improvements just to do something. DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also have to thank you again Dave for finally deleting some of these articles I'm speedying (all thanks to my voracious time at Special:RandomInCategory) and I've been spending all day tagging the most obvious for deletion (certainly saves AfD some time and efforts!). SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:10:58, 22 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Pianogac

Pianogac (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Olga Jegunova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello - you have rejected my efforts for the Olga Jegunova article - I posted a question to you asking for more detailed help as I have listed 12 references many of which are independent - but! My question has disappeared from your list and so I do not know if you replied! Can you repost your reply please?!

Pianogac (talk) 08:10, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm बिप्लब आनन्द. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Mahika Sharma, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Biplab Anand (Talk with me) 12:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isabel Sabogal

Dear David: Already it added five references and seven external links. Are not enough reliable sources? Unfortunately none of them is in English, but is that the author belongs to another cultural circle. Sorry if this message contains mistakes. English is not my language. talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC) Sorry. Thi's my signature: Orlandina) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.7.92.48 (talk) 18:56, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CSD A7 tags

Hi,

I notice you've been tagging articles CSD A7 on notability grounds, judging by your edit summaries. That's not what A7 is about; it's about there not being a credible claim of significance (not notability; they are not the same thing). The claim does not even need to be true to fail A7, nor does it need to be sourced or verifiable. Non-notablity alone is not a criterion for speedy deletion, and it doesn't matter how non-notable an article's subject is; if there is a credible claim of significance, it's not an A7. Although you're not the first person I've come across who evidently misunderstands A7, I'm surprised you didn't know this as you've been here for 7 years, whereas I've only been here for 7 months! Adam9007 (talk) 01:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I very much wish you hadn't declined Minerva Mendez though Adam9007 because I searched and she actually doesn't have any obvious "acting work" (therefore nothing "credible") and all I found was a 2016 planned movie. It seems she is active with social media but certainly nothing notable. Simply look at the history as well as and you'll see two IPs which seemed to have been the subject herself blanked the page twice. SwisterTwister talk 02:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SwisterTwister: I didn't decline it per se; I'm not an admin. We are, however, allowed to disagree and remove the tag. I thought the claim about Minerva Mendez gaining media attention is probably a credible claim of significance. If you think she, or any of the other articles are not notable, go ahead and nominate them (AfD or PROD) on those grounds. Adam9007 (talk) 02:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adam9007 Yes but the question is what "media attention" as I found nothing at all (all I find is her own primary websites). This seemed like an easy speedy rather than spending its time at AfD (although I may avidly consider PROD). SwisterTwister talk 02:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SwisterTwister:For the purposes of A7, it's irrelevant. If the claim is credible (and I think it is), it's not an A7. If you can't find anything to support it, it's either non-notable or a hoax. A7 is not about verifiability. Adam9007 (talk) 02:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DJ Montay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

09:27:19, 23 November 2015 review of submission by Omerh88

Omerh88 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Burn Advocates Network (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for the feedback. I added 2 third-party sources and now have 11. Is the problem in the sources or the content itself?

The sources currently include Channel 10 (one of two Commercial Broadcast Channels in Israel), Haaretz (Israel's oldest newspaper) and the Jewish Standard.

Thanks

09:44:15, 23 November 2015 review of submission by Mandymlall

Mandymlall (talk · contribs)
- Draft:New Media Vision (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you pleases explain how I might correct this mistake and have my article published please? I have been unsuccessful in my submissions thus far. Can you advise if it require more referencing as i've tried to reference every sentence, or what other steps I can do to ensure this article is successfully submitted to articles for creation.

Mandy Mandymlall (talk) 09:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Mike Steib

Hi David,

Thank you so much for taking the time to review Draft: Mike Steib twice now. I know you play an important role in maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia platform.

I am writing to follow up about the most recent rejection of this draft. Mike Steib is an expert in the internet business space. This has been noted on the Wikipedia draft by the thirteen high-profile news sources that have interviewed him for insight on the subject. I have included no less than 38 references from reputable sources, as defined by Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. This is far more than other pages of comparable executives, and also more than others on your talk page who complain about the number of sources you require. I would greatly appreciate your acceptance of this submission, or at least a more detailed response regarding steps that can be taken to ensure the publication of this biography. With sources already including The New York Times, CNN, Bloomberg and Fox News I am not sure what other sources you expect to be included.

Thank you again for your work to improve Wikipedia. I assure you that publishing Draft:Mike Steib will only benefit the Wikipedia community.

LJacobs2195 (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:38:44, 23 November 2015 review of submission by Ndecubas

Ndecubas (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Regenestem (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am requesting a re-review because I have taken out the press release articles and added more viable ones. I would also like to note that the company is a BBB Accredited business, if that helps the case in any way. Thank You, and let me know if there is anything else I can add.

Ndecubas (talk) 15:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:12:25, 23 November 2015 review of submission by 184.183.165.106

184.183.165.106 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Zesty.io (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! I thought this was a pretty credible and unbiased list of sources. Looking at comparable CMS wikis', my list of sources seems to be adequate. What exactly could I do to add to this so it meets Wikipedia's standards?

Draft:School of Journalism and Mass Communications - re-review request

Hey SwisterTwister, I believe I have corrected the notability issues by adding several more third-party sources, as well as additional content. Hopefully this is up to Wiki standards. Thank you - Cravennn (talk) 19:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew_Stevens_(musician) - request change of headline

Hello SwisterTwister, I would like to request to change the article title to Matthew Stevens (guitarist). Please advise how I can do this? Thanks so much for your help! - Ongaku+ongaku(Ongaku ongaku (talk) 20:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Well Ongaku ongaku, I added "musician" because there is no other musician article so there's no other likely article for that although if it's needed, I can change it (disambiguations are what is more relevant and likely). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 20:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

review of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:DBMaestro

Hi! I have changed the language quite a bit to make sure i describe and not praise. Also, there are many third party sources cited, all independent of the company. The company is notable because it is the first that has created this technology. any additional help/guidance would be much appreciated! Nerminsaleemi (talk) 21:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:21:19, 23 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mojobadshah

Mojobadshah (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Magic (religion) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister, kindly address what content needs to be improved upon specifically in order to improve the content in my article on "magic (religion)"Mojobadshah (talk) 22:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mojobadshah (talk) 22:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page you rejected was created separately

Hi, I saw on the talk page for the creator of Thamizhz Thiyagarajan that you'd rejected an AFC on it earlier today for lack of notability. Looks like it was then created separately with the same issues, thought I would bring it to your attention to review. JamesG5 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hello ST. I saw your edit here and I wanted to let you know that whoever this person is they have been trying to create a page about themselves for several days now. Both the article and its corresponding talk page have been deleted more than once. I am not quite sure how "Vinay rathi" comes into it but the edit history here shows several page moves that become odder as they go on. It is late where I am and I can't figure our whether any of them need to be undone or not. Also they might be just as confusing for you but I did want to let you know about this in case you can figure out what is happening. Cheers and enjoy the rest of your week. MarnetteD|Talk 04:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, MarnetteD (and removing the reflist) as I first encountered this when it happened and I hope they simply learn what the features are actually for and capable of.

Have a good night's sleep as it's only 10:50PM where I am and still plan to be awake from some hours. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 04:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding of more sources

Hi, SwisterSister! Added more high qualiry reference citations to BitX which you rejected earlier (BBC, Economist and local Nigeria, Indonesian, South African and Malaysian news sources. Hit me up if you think more are needed?? Werneravr (talk) 12:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability: Should I change topics, or find more articles?

Hi SwisterTwister!

Thanks for looking at my article again! I'm glad it's improving. Are you saying that this business just inherently ins't notable enough? I've looked at the wiki CORP Notability guidelines, and it seems that all my third-party sources are more in-depth than generic announcements or reviews; many are news articles, and in-depth interviews. I believe Version One Ventures in notable because they have spurred the growth for so many companies! Not to mention the startup world is slowly growing in popularity and size. However, I may have to start with a different startup/venture capitalist if these sources aren't strong enough. I can't find any more!

Thanks in advance for your help and advice. Johnsonclaire770 (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article was rejected and Article having all the references

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you for your review. I added more references about Draft: Kundan Srivastava. Thanks! Syd4tech (talk) 06:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HI

Jeffrey H Song (talk) 06:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC) Hi David, Thank you for taking the time to review my created article Draft: Fast Future Brands. I have checked the submission’s references with notability at all. As you can see the references in my article, I am sure that is notability. Even though I tried to rectify the references a lot of times, there are declined with simple message “This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability” I would appreciate if you could give me some advice with more detailed information. Cheers.[reply]

Jeffrey H Song This simply still needs any more avaialble in-depth third-party sources overall to fully satisfy notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:29:51, 24 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Petecampbell88

Petecampbell88 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Wink Bingo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, my page for WinkBingo was refused on the grounds of notability. However, I feel it has been adequately sourced and is no more or less notable than many other pages already published. For example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/888casino. Could you please advise what else I can do to meet criteria. Many thanks Petecampbell88 (talk) 10:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Petecampbell88 It currenntly has several sources, yes, but I'm simply not sure if they are enough to fully satisfy notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Mhee Noi

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mhee Noi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The Nation article is enough for A7. Maybe not for GNG. Take to AfD if necessary. . Thank you. Ged UK 13:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Mxi Technologies

Hello SwisterTwister, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mxi Technologies, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ged UK 13:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to page your reviewed

Hi there, Thanks for reviewing the page I created on the NGO the UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition. You suggested that the article used to many primary sources - ie citiations to documents etc created by the organization its self. To remedy this I have added several citations to media articles about the organization and resubmitted it for aproval. Thanks PaperGoldFish (talk) 14:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PaperGoldFish There simply are not enough in-depth thid-party sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:08:47, 24 November 2015 review of submission by Jaymini.m

Jaymini.m (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Poq (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

I have added additional references in support of the article but my issue is most of the information I have found are from online news publications. Will this be a problem as the company I am writing about is 4 years old so there isn't any other referneces I can find at the moment, although I am still looking?

I have also corrected the references but for one that is missing the authors name, the article doesn't actually state the authors name, instead it only has the publications name in place of the author. Please let me know your thoughts.

Look forward to hearing your feedback.

Many thanks!

Jaymini.m Hello! There are several listed sources but all of them seem like trade publications and such, so I'm not sure how notable the article is, so the article could also use any more available major news publications such as news, magazine and journals. DGG Would you care to weigh here? SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21:22:01, 24 November 2015 review of submission by LoveLarry1234

LoveLarry1234 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Christopher Bevans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

Can you please elaborate on your comments for the ["Christopher Bevans"] draft? You mentioned "This is getting closer, but still needs any more available sources about him and his work overall"

are you able to refer to certain lines/paragraphs that need rewriting or different sourcing? Your insight is appreciated.

Thanks.

A beer for you!

Thanks for greetings! FanisWiki (talk) 21:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:44:34, 24 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mbabco

Mbabco (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Susan Seddon Boulet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I guess I need clarification about a couple points.

1) "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule."

I've referenced several sources that cite the artist as either a founder or an important member of the visionary art movement. I also reference 4 books dedicated completely to her art as well as a number of books that she has illustrated, including one by a well-known author, Ursula K. Le Guin. I would think any of these would mark her as worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia.

2) Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Every paragraph in the article has references that could be looked at to verify the information. What is wrong with the references I have used?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Mbabco (talk) 22:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mbabco The article is acceptable but for enhancement, it simply still needs any more available sources than the currently listed ten (10). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your prompt review and acceptance of my article! It is much appreciated MontagsOnFire (talk) 23:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gill Fielding - Notability

Good evening. I have now added a further five independent third-party references in support of the subject's notability. These all have the subject as their central subject. I will resubmit for review now. Many Thanks Neilho (talk) 01:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article review - Notability

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for your prompt review of my article. I have added an Awards section complete with references to attest to the notability of the subject. I hope this meets the guidelines! Many thanks Izbukvic (talk) 01:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 02:32:22, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Jbsfsax

Jbsfsax (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Arthur Kudner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My motivation of creating an article about Arthur Kudner stems from finding his famous words on "big words" first, and later discovering that he himself had not just been the author of a single famous phrase, but had a decisive role in the development of the American dream and the American Way of Life which has both impressed and been detested by Europeans before and after World War II. As it is my first article on a person, I did not notice any Wikiquette about that particular kind of Wikipedia articles.

Unfortunately, I do not have enough time to thoroughly research his life and dig out some more "citeable" references for the things I found out by simple searching the web for pieces on him. I choose an extract of information from these sources and composed them to an article covering the Person Arthur Kudner, both father and son. The father, son and the sons first wife were definitely persons of public interest at their time, by being close friends of Grace Kelly, and by leaving footprints first in America and later worldwide in the way advertisement and marketing were becoming an essential part of public life in modern western society.

My conception of Wikipedia was that articles would start even if they are not yet perfect, fragmentary and erroneous, as long as the focused item or, in my case, person was relevant to the public. After reading the guidelines on notability, it is clear to me that Arthur Kudner, both junior and senior, had been creative professionals which made significant contributions to the marketing and advertisement industries in the developing 20th century, insofar fulfilling the second additional criterion on notability, namely "originating a significant new concept, theory or technique". It should not matter that Kudner's contributions were not in the pure artistic domain. Some of his ad slogans have even become common language, this alone should suffice to prove notability.

But I understand that all this needs references to reliable secondary sources and I guess that the sources I added to the first version do not meet all the necessary standards for reliability. My hope was and still is that other Wikipedia authors would close this gap after reading about the article and the famous citation, which also has not been covered in the wikipedia so far. I hope I could persuade you and would suggest to let the article start this way and invite corrections and completions, as I have seen with several Wiki articles before. Jbsfsax (talk) 02:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jbsfsax (talk) 02:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:05:06, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Kannadacinema

Kannadacinema (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Vandana (Kannada actress) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

      I don't find resources other than what used in the article Vandana(Kannada actress). Because she is a veteran actress active in 1960s decade. After her last film no one knows what she is doing. But she was a good actress who did many memorable roles in as many as 20 films in Kannada during her career spanning 8 years. You can watch her films on youtube

1.Post Master https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR5I5WBX8mk 2.Bhagyada Bagilu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc-CncWDino 3.Chinnari Puttanna https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L21EMMGZ7Ic and many more famous films

 I think the resources that are provided in the article are more than enough to create an article on artist.
 In this link http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12536/sandalwood/rajesh-stunner-on-silver-screen-exclusives-details one of the legendary actor of Kannada Rajesh says 
  "In the 1950 onwards Honnappa Bhagavathar, Rajakumar, Udayakumar, Kalyankumar, Panthulu, Ashwath, Narasimha raju, Balakrishna, Iyer, B Saroja Devi, Leelavathi, Pandari Bai, MV Rajamma, Mynavathi, "Vandhana", Kalpana, Jayanthi, Bharathi enriched the film industry."

  The Chiloka.com has created her profile (http://chiloka.com/celebrity/vandana) which will give the detailed filmography of her.
I don't why you are stopping this article from creating.  My intention is to respect this forgotten artist. If you are still not convinced and sticking to rules and regulations its ok.

Thank You!

Kannadacinema (talk) 05:05, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kannadacinema The article simply needs any more available sources for solid weight and depth. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:19:38, 25 November 2015 review of submission by 216.19.179.102

216.19.179.102 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Alexander Shorokhoff (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, thanks for re-reviewing. Please let me know specifically how many references are enough. The number of references seems to be excess of those provided for other watchmaker articles, as is the overall quality (3 of them are national newspapers). 216.19.179.102 (talk) 06:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

216.19.179.102 Simply however many there are that are in-depth and third-party. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:29:07, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Nittennair

Nittennair (talk · contribs)
- Draft:MuchTV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Resubmitted Article for muchTV

Hi David, Thank you very much for the help so far. I have added more references (This time from print media). Hopefully this will be enough for it to get approved.

Thank you once again.Nittennair (talk) 06:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Nittennair (talk) 06:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article Draft: Donati Salla Resubmitted by Abdulrahman1985

Dear David! Kindly receive a note of thanks from me due to the good job that you have done on my page particularly critiquing accordingly so that the article may become a notable one. So far I have edits on the article Draft:Donati Salla particularly in improving a sense of political figure in subject to politicians notability guidelines. Therefore kindly review the article and give me a feedback as well. Regards Abdulrahman1985 Thank you. --User:Abdulrahman1985 —Preceding undated comment added 06:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to comment on Draft:Jeremiah Texts from Qumran

Azureindignation (talk · contribs)

Hi SwisterTwister! Thanks for the comment on the draft.

I'm wondering if changing the draft to "Biblical Jeremiah Texts from Qumran" would be reasonable. In another conversation, I was informed that some of the Pseudo-Jeremiah texts were found on other Wikipedia pages, but I have seen a lack of representation of the Biblical Jeremiah scrolls found in other places on Wikipedia including the Letter of Jeremiah page, the Dead Sea Scrolls page, and the List of the Dead Sea Scrolls specifically in regards to Cave 4. If I focused more on the Biblical side of the Jeremiah Qumran texts, would that qualify as notable?

Thanks for the help. Azureindignation (talk) 07:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever makes the article seem like it's solidly notable and satisfying general notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article Draft: Jio Chat Resubmitted by Tejas Nair

Dear SwisterTwister, thanks for pointing out the scarcity of third-party sources. The draft now has a total of 20 citations of which some are in-depth about the topic. Please have a look if possible, and advice. Thanks Tejas Nair (talk) 07:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:29:01, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Keepsharingknowledge

Keepsharingknowledge (talk · contribs)
- Draft:West Suffolk Swimming Club (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

   I could do with some advice as the additional information required to have this page approved. You will have read the club has had world class swimmers train here with references backed up by external independent articles and other wiki pages. During my research i've found other swim clubs wiki pages with less heritage.
   As this is my first page I do require some specific guide nice

Thank you Andrew

Keepsharingknowledge (talk) 07:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keepsharingknowledge The amount of sourcing is acceptable but most of the sources seem focused with the past members of the club, rather than specific coverage about the club itself (the club needs to be independently notable for a solid separate article). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you. Will dig somemore! :) Probenciano (talk) 08:26, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

09:24:37, 25 November 2015 review of submission by Baron667

Baron667 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mark Clarke (Politician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for taking the time to review my article and for tidying it for me - my first wikiarticle so I've been on the help page to try and improve it a bit.

I got what you said about notability - yes, he hasn't held a position of office which would seem to be the requirement for notable politicians. I think therefore its fair to say I've probably mislabeled him. Should it say "Mark Clarke (Political Activist)" instead?

I have improved some of the sources, removed the weaker ones like Brietbart and replaced them with stronger ones, such as the BBC. I have removed the articles as the wiki helpers told me that it looked like CITEKILL and I was trying to hard to prove his notability. In fact I wasn't trying to do that, I was being careful to use a lot of sources because many of the newspaper articles about Clarke seem to be allegations at the moment, so I wanted to be sure it was clear it wasn't Wikipedia making the allegations. Even so - where one good source is necessary Ive kept it that way.

Also I have added a section where BBC Newsnight did a special feature on him this month, and also added a documentary about him which aired in 2007.

Can you suggest anything else to help me improve the article so it passes the notability guidelines? I've added lead articles and front page stories in the reference section with major newspapers - that might prove his notoriety but not sure about his notability.

Baron667 (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there David. Any update on approving this? You may have read that the UK International Decelopment Minister has resigned over this scandal now and its possible the Chairman of the Conservative Party in the UK will do as well - I will add this to the article. However what about changing it from (Politician) to (Political Activist)? Seems that would surmount the issue of having to be elected or hold office to assume notability. Baron667 (talk) 06:39, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Baron667 (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David

Have I met the requirements yet for this? Your two issues with it were:

notability: I have elaborated more, including documentary episodes on BBC on him, or special features, on national flagship shows: 3 in total (Newsnight x2 and BBC Radio 4), I have also elaborated more on his key involvement in the resignation of a uk government minister. If you can remove the politician handle then does this prove notability?

citations: I have furnished the article with many sources from UK's most respected newspapers and media outlets, including: BBC News, BBC Radio 4, BBC Newsnight, The Telegraph, The Times, The Guardian, THe Financial Times, The Independent, (Basically all the Broadsheets) and also the most widely read newspapers in the UK - Daily Mail, The Sun, The Mirror, and London's most listened to radio show LBC.

THe man is at the centre of the tatler tory scandal; he is at the centre of an investigation which has brought down a government minister, looks to bring down the Party Chairman, he's associated with the Prime Minister, national conferences have been cancelled, the entire executive of COnservative Party youth wing has been suspended; its been some of the biggest news in the UK over the last 3 months and an activist has even committed suicide over the scandal. MPs have allegedly been blackmailed. Is there anything else I can do to prove notability? If so please let me know David.

Thanks

Baron667 (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

09:27:34, 25 November 2015 review of submission by PalettePic

PalettePic (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Palette Pictures (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

First of all, thank you for taking your time revising my article.

However, I would like your help clarifying your comment about my submission, when you said "Simply not enough in-depth third-party sources overall".

In my view, I have backed every statement in that article with evidence, and the work presented there is notable (again, it's the first co-production show in a 1-billion-habitants country).

So, what else could I do to fix this article? What kind of information is missing?

Thank you, G

Request on 16:35:43, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by KarenFLI

KarenFLI (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Robert Rosenthal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. Thank you for reviewing my article about Robert Rosenthal. I am hoping you can help me understand what lead you to determine that he is not notable so that I can adjust the article appropriately. He is the CEO of a company he founded at a time when there were not many companies providing wealth management, he lead the IPO of a major corporations (Entenmann's), serves in leadership roles of a major university, Hofstra, a major health system, North Shore-Long Island Jewish, and at one time was an owner of the NY Islanders. Each of these are referenced with either article citations or website references. Please let me know what I can do to improve this article. Thanks! KarenFLI

KarenFLI (talk) 16:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: TECTERRA Draft

Hi there,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:TECTERRA

On November 8 you indicated that there needs to be more available sources on the work that this organization does. What can I do to make this page better?

Nxucgy (talk) 16:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COSMINA ENE Draft

Hello, Thank you for taking the time to review my submission for Cosmina Ene. I added several more references I found about this artist. She is a French artist and a lot of information published about her is in French, but I have been able to translate the articles. I have used both the guidelines for reliable sources and notability, as you suggested and I feel I have provided many sufficient sources to determine the subject's notability. Further direction is much appreciated. Thank you ! Hellosink (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)Amber - HelloSink[reply]

Football articles

Thanks, I'll take a look! Giant Snowman 18:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:19:21, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mkatz44

Mkatz44 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Dinitia Smith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

What sort of sources are you looking for? Nearly all the information is sourced online; everything else came from the primary source herself, Dinitia Smith—I am her assistant but she wrote the copy herself. Much of her work is pre-Internet. How can we expedite this? Mkatz44 (talk) 18:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:55:15, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Dsalazar6

Dsalazar6 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sexism in tabletop gaming (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Let me just say thanks for being so helpful with my article. I can accept that it needs work, and when I have more free time I want to try and verify some of those specific examples. I would however like it if you could give me any pointers about finding reports regarding harassment, as I had trouble finding many that weren't just mere anecdote. Do you have any tips for searching for news reports and other proper accounts? It's honestly been the hardest part of my research and I definitely needs some pointers. Any help you can provide is much appreciated.

Dsalazar6 (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Dsalazar6 (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DeafVideo.tv added more third party sources

Hi SwisterTwister, you've given me feedback on a draft page I'm working on. I've went in and added more third party references. How many are needed to make a page? I think I've found about as many as I'm going to find for a subculture like deafness. If the page is not now adequate then how can I delete the draft page? Feel free to do that for me if you don't think the page is now worthy of wikipedia. I've given it all I have. I do think this is an interesting topic that people who are interested in learning about ASL or Deaf culture should know about. It is a Deaf space that propogates the spread and influence of Deaf culture in the internet age. Thanks for considering my page and for the help making it possible. Djgriffin7 (talk) 05:44, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Intel Anti-Theft

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for taking the time to review this! Quite embarrassingly in my 7 years here I've only created 2 articles, so I'm trying to force myself to learn a little more about it. I'm pretty sure this could be notable as it was in the news for being cracked a couple of years ago, and Intel were the first to develop a hard/soft -ware suite such as this. I'll keep going forward and add some more content and references -- samtar ^whisper 06:52, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Took over Don Joint article

Hi SwisterTwister! I took over the Don Joint article after an IRL conversation with myrnaj about creating it. You had previously commented on it at [[5]], saying"This is good and I'm willing to accept but the article could use some more sources if available. SwisterTwister talk 17:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)". I've rewritten it and added further citations. Please feel free to review it as published and give me any notes. Thanks! Heyneff (talk) 07:03, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:15:29, 26 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by HastingsBella

HastingsBella (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mads Munk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Editor - Thanks for you review - please can you let us know why this piece has been rejected - we have four + independent editorial sources - all major reputable magazines and/or newspapers, all with interviews and/or major feature length coverage: Wallpaper, Square Mile, Financial Times and Scandinavian Traveller - plus quotes from Ad Week and various listings on third party websites includingIMDb - the last reviewer said we needed another editorial source - which we have now supplied (Square Mile interview) We believe we now have more than three independent editorial sources for this article - and enough to make this notable. Please could you tell me why this was rejected so we can rectify this as we are really at a loss to know what else to do here? Many thanks. HastingsBella.

HastingsBella (talk) 10:15, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Badsha

Hi SwisterTwister. I removed your speedy deletion tag from Omar Badsha because I thought I could improve it. I have removed the puffery and promotional tone and added some references. I don't think it meets the criteria for G11 now but if you still think TNT applies then feel free to nominate it for deletion. Sarah-Jane (talk) 11:27, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

politician notability criteria; unsure?

It really baffles me as to, how is it that you have chosen to reject my contribution by actually stating that, you are not sure whether 'it does or does not' fit the politician notability criteria! Being unsure does not give you that privilege for the encyclopedia is not meant for you alone. Some of the sources are certainly curated by me over the web and it is but obvious that one would notice that I have a verbatim surname to the one relating to the politician I am attempting to insert into the encyclopedia. Moreover, has it ever occurred to you that some vernacular sources from yore, although legitimately recorded on other mediums may have not yet been brought online? Moreover, it is for a certain that 'mmsajjan' was a bona fide elected representative representing a constituency of 2,00,000 voters even though most of them may not even be aware of 'wikipedia'! And this does fit the notability because pictures do not lie and do take note of the photograph therein of said politician greeting the most fiery Prime Minister of India; no less! Shivsajjan (talk) 21:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:20:25, 26 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mohd Sarim Ashrafi

Mohd Sarim Ashrafi (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Cultural Education Centre, AMU Aligarh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Draft:Cultural Education Centre, AMU Aligarh is a notable institute but i dont have much references to cite them. Tell me how can i make it better??

Mohd Sarim Ashrafi (talk) 13:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Society for Nutrition Education

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Society for Nutrition Education, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It's not that spammy really. That being said, I'm not sure it's notable either, so might be worth taking to AfD. Thank you. Ged UK 13:44, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Humphries

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you for reviewing my entry https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tony_Humphries_(musician)

I'm just starting out on Wikipedia and have some questions. This entry has since been flagged as requiring further citations.

I have read through your help page on citations but require more specific information. I'm unsure as to which statements need specific citations to improve the entry. Or is it perhaps that the sources themselves are fine but I've formatted them incorrectly.

Would appreciate your assistance and insight in order to get the article fully compliant with community standards.

Ppicker (talk) 15:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Thomas J. Carroll

Hi SwisterTwister,

  You declined my entry on Father Thomas Carroll. Draft:Thomas J. Carroll It's only my second article so please help point me in the right direction.  Apparently the primary problem is that the citations don't make it clear that the subject is notable.  On my first entry I ran into the problem of "peacock" and "puffery" so I went out of my way to avoid superlatives and the like. I've added additional citations and some new material to help make it clear.  Please take another look and give me some guidance on how to improve this. He really was a pioneer and a leading figure in the field of training people who became blind as adults.

thanks! RobSVA (talk) 19:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21:07:30, 26 November 2015 review of submission by Costanzaucd

Costanzaucd (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Frank Moss (labour leader) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

can I know specifically what i can do to improve it? thank you

Women in punk rock

Thank you for accepting my article for creation on Women in punk rock. I'll continue to work on it to improve it from start class. If you have have the time, I'd love to hear suggestions - especially for organizing the article.Netherzone (talk) 22:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23:24:15, 26 November 2015 review of submission by Caramelcarmela

Caramelcarmela (talk · contribs)
- User:Caramelcarmela/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am trying to submit a wiki article for my band Caramel Carmela. I don't understand why I can't use the description I have provided. As I stated, all of the band's information submitted are my own words. Our bio is the same on each web page, because use the same bio for all of our artist submission forms. I assure you nobody is going to ask for the information to be taken down. The only person who could possibly do that would be me.

Best regards, Sha Gipson Caramel Carmela

11:53:43, 27 November 2015 review of submission by Sjscott80

Sjscott80 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Logz.io (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! After further review, you said that the draft page Logz.io looked good and asked if I could add more sources. I added more sources a few weeks ago. So, could you let me know the status of the draft whenever you have a chance? :)

Sjscott80 (talk) 11:53, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:29:43, 27 November 2015 review of submission by CLynnC2015

CLynnC2015 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lori G. Beaman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Reviewer-

Could you give me more specifics about adding third party sources? Would direct links to all Journal articles, books, (publishers), ISBN numbers, etc. satisfy this? Could you provide me an example of what you are looking for?

Thank you.

Hello SwisterTwister, thank You for reviewing my article! Unfortunately it has been deleted. Is it possible to get it back as draft? I could not found how... I realy tried. I wish to follow Your suggestion and complete it with the third-part refereces (which are many too...) May I ask You to review my article once more then?

Thank You and best regards, Natasha Natashakhardina (talk) 23:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You unreviewed a page I curated

fcaram Hello there, you most recently left me this message:

Hi, I'm SwisterTwister. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, User:Lynnlindahl/sandbox, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 19:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

I was wondering why you might've unreviewed this page. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 02:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I hadn't noticed that Skyllfully and wasn't aware it had been reviewed. To be honest, about everyone who reviews pages gets one and I sure have so it's not to be taken seriously sometimes as two people may have clicked "review" without knowing.

SwisterTwister talk 02:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem, thanks for the explanation. It seemed kinda odd. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 15:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03:58:46, 28 November 2015 review of submission by Reenun

Reenun (talk · contribs)
- User:Reenun/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I want to ask David, the random patroller - When all the sources mentioned are of leading newspapers and agencies why more references are needed. The article is of interest because it talks about public speaking on Indian culture and Yoga represented at places of repute - University of Oxford, California, International Association of Yoga Therapists by DR. Radhika Nagrath. Also she has been the guest of honour to the government institutions like Consul General of India to Dubai. Reenun (talk) 03:58, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reenun First, please see Referencing for beginners to learn how to better format the listed sources and, second, the listed sources are simply not enough for the notability guidelines listed with my comment. All your claims and information may be accurate but it simply needs more sources overall. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 04:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: OWASP

Hello — I'm just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of OWASP, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. There are definitely issues with the article, however, including a serious lack of third party sources. Let me know if you have any questions. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 04:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With reference to the submitted article 'Adi Dharam' reviewed by you

Hi, As per your instructions I have added a few more references to the article on Adi Dharam (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Adi_Dharam). However, I had resubmitted the article after doing so, but this another reviewer rejected the submission saying that the article is already present on Wikipedia, which is not true. I wrote to him validating my point but till now I have not received any reply from him nor am I expecting one soon. Kindly help me out otherwise I have again to resubmit it and again agonizingly wait for another month for approval.

Thanks

Gimunda (talk) 10:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Adesua Etomi

Hi, As regards the article i submitted and your comment - Draft: Adesua Etomi The person in question is an actor not a musician. Thanks Msjazzyfed (talk) 17:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lilongwe Wildlife Trust

You just beat me tagging that page. It also has some copvio or close paraphrasing of http://www.lilongwewildlife.org/programmes/rescue-rehabilitation/lilongwe-wildlife-centre/ aee this Google search. 220 of ^Borg 06:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah haha 220 of Borg, I've actually been searching some random older articles and deleting the most obvious ones when I thought I would scan NPP as always. As someone who cares very much about conservation, environment and wildlife, it's unfortunate to delete but as mentioned with my edit summary, I simply found nothing better than some passing News mentions so it's a WP:TNT at best. Cheers,

SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My oswald article

just noticed your comments re reasons for declining. I understand from chat on the ships page that any warship over 100 tons is considered notable and I would point out that Oswalds five sister ships already have their own page Lyndaship (talk) 17:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PubNub article review follow up

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for taking the time to review PubNub on November 14, 2015!

I've added few dozen secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject and improved the PubNub submission's referencing. Anxiously waiting for a follow up review that the information is now verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the PubNub subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Thanks for considering PubNub article and for the help making it possible.

Yigal59 (talk) 19:48, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

Submission declined followup

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for reviewing my article on Christopher Anselmo!

I completely understand your reason behind the comment. What can I do to fix the problem? I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, so perhaps it was the way I inserted my references? (I believe there are enough credible third-party sources to support the notability guidelines, but there might easily be a more effective way to reference them). If not, what other sorts of sources do you suggest adding? Your help is much appreciated.

Thank you in advance for your assistance in bringing my article to life! --Adenburg (talk) 05:45, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adenburg Simply add any more available in-depth third-party sources overall to that it fully satisfies the listed notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've got an idea of where I need to go! But just so we're on the same page... Thinking that would involve, say, for the "Involvement at Northwestern" section: finding press releases for the various shows he's written and directed, and not quoting from his website or LinkedIn. Would that be enough, or should I go further (and if so, how much further would I have to go)? Thank you once again. --Adenburg (talk) 05:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adenburg Well to be honest press releases aren't always used unless they are the only available sources as they often simply published material by the entity (or entities) themselves so third-party sources (such as news, journals, magazines, etc.) are often used instead. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see! Quite a few of my sources are from various newspapers, both regional and college-based, and some electronic (see Broadwayworld.com, though a more widely used website for theatrical/Broadway-related news is Playbill.com, where I just found a source relating to my article). I'll try and find some more newspapers and interviews and will attempt to phase out all the "entity-published" references; will resubmit my article within the next couple of days. Thank you! --Adenburg (talk) 06:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07:31:09, 30 November 2015 review of submission by Anatha Gulati

Anatha Gulati (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Subrat Sahoo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Anatha Gulati (talk) 07:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC) I have added references in my article but as per reviewer that is not enough. So I want to know which type of third party references consider in my case. I have given news references but my draft was declined. I have also read the section of references for newbie and notability but I can't understand So please help me in my case.[reply]

Anatha Gulati (talk) 07:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)After that how to move my draft article to the main space of Wikipedia? or it will move automatically after approval of reviewer. So also help me in this case.[reply]

Anatha Gulati The article has information and sources which is a start but needs more to at least satisfy biographies notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Battle of Karbala#RFC for notability

Hi DGG, Can you please participate in this RFC and tell us your idea about the notability of some articles. Regards.--Seyyed(t-c) 07:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually not DGG, I'm SwisterTwister

, but frankly I would say some of them seem notable especially with the likelihood of archived sources so I'll comment there. Cheers, Sa.vakilian SwisterTwister talk 08:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I wrote the massage first for DGG and then copied it here. :-)--Seyyed(t-c) 08:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sa.vakilian It's natural and my name is David but not "GG", haha.

SwisterTwister talk 08:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12:26:07, 30 November 2015 review of submission by Spwbarton

Spwbarton (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Invest Europe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am keen to understand more clearly why the sources provided to show Invest Europe's notability are not sufficient, and what type of further article / link I could provide to allow the page to be published. Invest Europe is the European equivalent of the National Venture Capital Association in the United States, which seems to have little information to support its notability: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Venture_Capital_Association In the past week Invest Europe research has been referenced in the Financial Times - http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3a7d4ebe-78a4-11e5-a95a-27d368e1ddf7.html#axzz3sxtGHVMl In addition, an update to its professional standards, which acts as a code of conduct for the private equity and venture capital industry in Europe, has been reported widely in the European financial media (eg - Financial News - http://www.efinancialnews.com/story/2015-11-24/invest-europe-transparency-guidelines ) Would those additions help? Thank you,

Looking in, the Financial Times article is a mere mention in an article about a person unnconnected with the company. The Financial News article does show what you say, and if added to the article I'd accept it. DGG ( talk ) 19:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: RM Education

Hello SwisterTwister. Your proposal for speedy deletion of RM Education was declined on the grounds that RM is probably one of the largest educational IT providers in the UK, providing pretty much all of the broadband infrastructure for UK schools as well as email, software etc. Its notability can be confirmed by searching using its former name of Research Machines. The company is very significant in its own market - IT services for schools, colleges and universities - and was for many years the strongest competitor of Acorn Computers, until Acorn folded Guffydrawers (talk) 12:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:05:55, 30 November 2015 review of submission by 96.28.44.118

96.28.44.118 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Miratech (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

SwisterTwister: please review the edits I have made re. Miratech Group. The information stated herein is factual, and I have taken great pains to provide, in reference to your editorial comments, numerous independent, external references; I also have taken the step to provide, from those independent external references, the information they have given to Miratech supporting why Miratech is notable. This is the third time our submission has been declined, and we're getting quite frustrated. I would appreciate any further inputs should the submission this time not be satisfactory, and we appreciate your help in getting this information about Miratech on Wikipedia. It's all factual; it's all out there for public consumption, and the company deserves a place in Wikipedia - which I use constantly, btw, in my daily work and personal life.

Thank you. Happy Holidays. Kind regards, Lara

16:30:00, 30 November 2015 review of submission by Galitwolf

Galitwolf (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Tamar Eisenman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for your review! This is my first wiki page I am editing. I looked over your remarks. As you mentioned there wasn't enough in-depth third-party sources so I have added 18 new third party sources to the References subject.

I wanted to make sure I am in the right direction before saving my edit again for review.

Thank you so much, Galitwolf

Request on 16:38:37, 30 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Inga1976

Inga1976 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ardo Ran Varres (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. I was asked to create an article on composer Ardo Varres for the Estonian Vikipeedia and subsequently to create a page in the English Wikipedia. The article in Estonian has been up for a while but my attempts to post the English version have been denied many times already, despite my efforts to create the footnotes and references in the correct format, still the answer has been that the notoriety standard is not met. What am I to do? Thank you. Helen

Inga1976 (talk) 16:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:29:38, 30 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by 184.147.121.46

184.147.121.46 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Wilhelm Neumann-Torborg' (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, thanks for reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Wilhelm_Neumann-Torborg'. The German references do refer to him as a "well-known" sculptor, and if you look at the references you can see he is included in reference works about artists as well as in recent newspaper articles and scholarly papers. How would I assert this in the article itself to show you that this is a notable person? Thanks for your advice.184.147.121.46 (talk) 20:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC) 184.147.121.46 (talk) 20:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Thank you for the reply. I'm glad it passes the notability hurdle.

Re your request for "simply" more sources and more information, I'm a bit baffled how to fulfill this request.

Re sources, how many more does it need? At some point in the creation process, there was an auto-generated list called "Find sources for Wilhelm Neumann-Torborg" or similar. I promise I clicked on every link (except JSTOR, because I don't have a subscription) and put everything I found in the article.

Also, what do you mean by more information? Is there a minimum length I need to reach? One of the sources that I could access has a long description of how he was hired to make the Elberfelder Poor Relief Momument but I thought that was a bit too fine detail for an encyclopedia article. But I could add another sentence there and pad it out a bit.

Thanks again for your help!184.147.121.46 (talk) 21:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've added two more references, so it now has nine.184.147.121.46 (talk) 14:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:35:18, 1 December 2015 review of submission by Jing jsb

Jing jsb (talk · contribs)
- Draft:DigiPas USA LLC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, we tried to put in as many 3rd-party sources as we can, but we are not sure if we are doing the right thing. Can you tell us which parts do not fulfil the notability guidelines?

06:03:20, 1 December 2015 review of submission by Sunil~mlwiki

Sunil~mlwiki (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kalamandalam Gangadharan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

For notability I have provided Indian National Award link and a printed encyclopedia link with page number along with other two books in citation. Also provided the newspaper links Can u please suggest me what you want more? Regards,

Request on 08:30:32, 1 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Ybanezedward

Ybanezedward (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lindsay De Vera (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I saw you reviewing my article and I'm really having a hard time reaching your standards of notability. I knew some of her TV commercials, print ads and modeling career, if I can provide the info on list format with the links (like YouTube) provided in reference section, will it count as notability? I made some little changes on your previous review as of 20:37, 30 November 2015‎, please check it out if you have time. Thanks

What has to be included for third party sources in a draft

Dear SwisterTwister,

Draft link : -  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:IJSRD&redirect=no

I got following comment for declination of my draft on IJSRD "Comment: Simply needs in-depth third-party sources overall to at least satisfy journals notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:42, 1 December 2015 (UTC)"

Which third party sources should I include to satisfy the journals notability. As it is e-journal and working with academic Publishing. Please tell the third party sources names so we can include it. Also tell which references should be included. As we have included the external links giving notability of this Journal.

Please reply. IJSRD Editor (talk) 08:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)--IJSRD Editor (talk) 08:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @ISJRD Editor: Please read and understand WP:42, and recognise that the absence of sources meeting these simple but stern criteria mean that it is very unlikely that your journal, of which you seem to be the paid editor, is going to be accepted as an article. Please read WP:BURDEN. We will advise you, but we are very unlikely to find the sources for you. Fiddle Faddle 10:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:06:53, 1 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Chis Maxwell

Chis Maxwell (talk · contribs)
- Draft:James Chisholm (Senior) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The reviewer has rejected my article on James Chisholm (Senior) based on a lack of notability ["While most historical subjects are accepted, I'm simply not seeing the solid notability here"], suggesting the addition of more secondary sources and improvement of referencing. I have currently included some 40 primary sources in this article. With very few exceptions, the only major second source is the biography of the man's life that has just been published (The Merchant of Sydney). At the launch of this book last Saturday, Emeritus Professor Brian Fletcher, one of Australia's most distinguished historians of early colonial history, said it was extraordinary that such a prominent colonial identity had, to date, "slipped through the historian's net" and had "been sorely neglected for some two centuries". As Professor Fletcher says, James Chisholm has been largely ignored for more than 200 years, and yet he was the equal of many who already feature strongly in the articles of Wikipedia, and certainly exceeds many others in notability. He was a major early entrepreneur and merchant; responsible. possibly only secondary to Robert Campbell, for opening up significant trade with Bengal; he owned a large area of the early town of Sydney; he was selected by Governor Macquarie as a member of his Governor's Court; he owned the first Bank of New South Wales of which he was a founding shareholder and Director; and he was widely acclaimed as one of Sydney's most respected early citizens. He has been neglected by history because he was a modest man who did not promote himself. I have tried to avoid rhetoric and stuck to the facts. I am able to add many more primary sources to this article, if this is required. However, the only other secondary sources that mention him are already cited. Can you please advise on how I should proceed? With thanks Chis Maxwell Chis Maxwell (talk) 11:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:28:36, 1 December 2015 review of submission by Pracbrown

Pracbrown (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Instant Hedge (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am thinking whether my article on Instant Hedge would be better placed as a sub-section within the already existing Hedge (Hedgerow) definition. Your thoughts are welcome!

Dharmakeerthi Sri Ranjan

Hi. I've declined your U5 as it is in article space. However, I've prodded it. Thinking on, it might be worth an A7 as it tells us sweet FA about the man himself. A prod 2 would be welcome (to me, not the author...). Peridon (talk) 11:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

All I did was move the draft to draftspace. You don't leave the rejection message for me. I'm an admin, I know how to write articles without using draftspace. DS (talk) 12:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DragonflySixtyseven: The message that you received was automatically produced by the articles for creation helper script. Unfortunately, it's not an uncommon occurrence for the script to get confused and recognize the wrong person as the page-creator, and because you moved the page it seemed to think that you created the draft. I'm sure no offense was intended, just a flaw in a program. Kharkiv07 (T) 13:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

DragonflySixtyseven Yes, to be honest, AfC will not always let you know who it sends it to, and if you've noticed, I review several. For example, I've often resubmitted a draft for the user and I'll get the message.

SwisterTwister talk 18:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:13:39, 1 December 2015 review of submission by Blockergroup

Blockergroup (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Penny Drue Baird (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Good morning, based on your feedback as to why my article was declined, I increased the amount of verifiable references/citations for the Penny Drue Baird page. I have resubmitted a re-view and wanted to confirm this is what you need to accept the page for Penny Drue Baird.

==Ronnie Apteker

Hi SisterTwister Re your review of my page, I take your comments on board and hope to be able to provide a solution myself. But I feel bound to say, that a lack of consistency over how criteria are applied is one of the most confusing and maddening things about contributing to Wikipedia. I found it easier doing my university thesis! Take a look at David Frankel (entrepreneur) who was Ronnie Apteker's business partner. It reads like the dullest of CVs, largely written by David Frankel himself if the View History is anything to go by. So could your explain how he is able to get away with that, whereas Ronnie Apteker deserves recognition if only for his contribution to cinema. Doesn't Wiki say that films, books, music are evidence in themselves?

It seems a self-evident that unless criteria are applied equally, then the system must be flawed and consequently in danger of losing credibility Picknick99 (talk) 16:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article Resubmission (Tup Tup Palace)

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for reviewing my draft article and for your feedback (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Tup_Tup_Palace&redirect=no). I have added more in-depth third-party sources and made some amendments to the structure and content of the article.

In terms of depth of coverage, Tup Tup Palace has been the subject of verifiable significant coverage in many reliable, independent secondary sources spanning a period of some 8 years. There is no shortage of verifiable, objective evidence that it has attracted significant attention from numerous independent sources. The article now has 54 citations in total, of which approximately 1/3 constitute ‘significant’ coverage as opposed to ‘trivial / incidental’. I am aware that the trivial / incidental sources are not, in themselves, an argument for notability, but I feel that such citations can still provide useful background for the article as a whole, which I have tried to make as comprehensive as possible.

I feel that the audience of the sources is also relevant here; the coverage is not only limited to local news but features national and even some international coverage.

It is also my opinion that this venue has had a significant and demonstrable effect on Newcastle’s nightlife culture and national profile as a glamorous location. I say this because celebrities were simply not seen out in the city prior to it’s opening (a cursory internet search reveals this). The inference being that Newcastle as a city did not have a bar / nightclub of sufficient calibre to attract such celebrities.

I hope you agree there are now enough sources cited to demonstrate that the subject is genuinely notable, but I will of course take your guidance on that or any other improvements that you feel I could make. Laurahartley (talk) 17:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should I resubmit article

Hello sir, I need your help about this article, should I resubmit it or not yet ? are the non-English sources are not acceptable ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Oussama_Belhcen

Belisa Vranich Draft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Belisa_Vranich

Hi SwisterTwister, I'm confused by the repeated rejections – Vranich's class has been covered independently numerous times (well referenced by significant coverage in multiple secondary sources), she's a major media expert, she's been published by Wiley and Rayo, and is a leader in her field, which is a scientific one. What is lacking? Details on the individual breathing techniques themselves? ~ [Daveswallace] (talk) 20:28, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Monica Byrne

Hi SwisterTwister, I just resubmitted the article for review. I added more references, and also expanded on her work as playwright and non-fiction author. Is this now enough to support notability? If not, I would be grateful for suggestions. This is my first article from scratch, up to now I only edited and translated existing articles, so thanks for any help. Oefe (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

never mind, article has been accepted. Thanks anyway Oefe (talk) 21:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MassCEC article submission

Hi Sister Twister,

Thanks for your feedback. I want to let you know I spent a lot of time searching for sources outside of MassCEC, and was only able to find independent information primarily through the legislation that led to its inception, and content that partners and affiliated groups had put out. I used the NYSERDA, New York State Energy Research Development Authority, as a commensurate article and noticed they have similar sources and style of writing. While I can see why it appears to be written as an advertisement, this is what the organization does, as reported by them and every third party resource I could find.

Please let me know your thoughts on this and maybe provide a specific example of how I could fix it. Please feel free to edit yourself, as MassCEC has national and international recognition and certainly deserves an article. Side note, should it matter that MassCEC expressed opposition to a Wikipedia publication on them? Also something to consider.

Thank you for your time.

Alex Alsenal (talk) 22:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PubNub article declined follow up

Hi SwisterTwister,

I'm checking again on our PubNub article submission which was declined 16 days ago.

I've added since few dozen secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject and I improved the PubNub submission's referencing. I'm anxiously waiting for a follow up review to confirm that the information is now verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the PubNub subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia.

I'm grateful for your help in considering the PubNub article for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Yigal59 (talk) 23:10, December 1, 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 December 1#Opal Tometi

Your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opal Tometi was taken by 98.190.145.152 (talk · contribs) to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 December 1#Opal Tometi. Cunard (talk) 05:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Lawrence Byrd - Added Sources as per your suggestion

Hello! Thank you for your tips on improving the article on Lawrence Byrd. I have added a lot more sources, all from credible places. I have also included links to several books and papers that he was mentioned in. Do you think it needs anything else? Thank you so much for your time. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Lawrence_Byrd&redirect=no

Bridges Ventures

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thanks for your help. My page is still being rejected unfortunately, even though it has citations from respectable sources (Published non-fiction, government reports, UK Cabinet Office website, The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The Guardian, The Wharton School of Business (U.Penn), Businesweek - none of which publish anything other than their own opinion), plus many more. Do I need to add more?

Re the topic of my post not being notable, I am not sure why this is being cited as a reason for the post being rejected - Wikipedia has itself created a Category called 'Private equity firms of the United Kingdom', which has over 50 posts listed under it (many of which have 0 references), so this topic is notable by Wikipedia's own standards.

Would it help if I deleted some of the text from the post?

Cheers Aung2015

Aung2015 (talk) 15:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Aung2015 (talk) 15:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister,

I’d love to appeal for the Bridges Ventures post. I believe this post is a notable for the following reasons:

The organisation has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the firm (Times, Telegraph, Guardian, the UK Government, published non-fiction) – “Evidence of significant coverage by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability.”

Bridges plays a large role in the growth of the impact investment sector in the UK, in terms of both practice and research. Sustainable and impact investing is a growing financial sector which combines philanthropy and private equity. We are also at the forefront of the growth of sector in Latin America.

Bridges is an educational provider, the first in the world to offer global sustainable and impact investing training, in partnership with an American ivy league.

Are all of these reason not enough??

Thanks for all your help on this

Aung2015 (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister - hope you've had/are having a good holiday!! Just wanted to check up if the above made any sense/was possible? Thank you!

Aung2015 (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:30:09, 2 December 2015 review of submission by 69.200.224.107

69.200.224.107 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Michael Sweet (Photographer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Page is now updated with many additional third-party sources from credible publishers like The Village Voice, Leica Camera, Hyperallergic, Out Magazine, etc. Page matches photographer pages of his contemporaries such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siegfried_Hansen_%28photographer%29

articles added showing coverage of his work in various countries and languages Italy, France, Germany.

What specifically is still lacking to establish credibility as a photographer?

00:23:02, 3 December 2015 review of submission by Polentarion

Polentarion (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Andreas Anton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, you gave me some good advice and I made changes accordingly. Think the article is now good to go. Regards. Polentarion Talk 00:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you did reject the submission once, but you have not reacted since. I am not sure how to react. Polentarion Talk 16:47, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:07:04, 3 December 2015 review of submission by Kiaora1980

Kiaora1980 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Hernán Jiménez (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister -- Thank you for your review. I'm wondering why my submission was declined. Hernán Jiménez is one of the most notable Costa Rican entertainers, and all my references come from La Nación, which is Costa Rica's leading, most important and respectable newspaper. Could you please tell me how to improve the article in order to have it approved?

Many thanks! Kiaora1980

He may well-known locally but for a universal article here, it will need any more available information and sources for solid notability. Cheers Kiaora1980, SwisterTwister talk 01:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:59:11, 3 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Cmacsound

Cmacsound (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Curtis Macdonald (saxophonist) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your review. My article draft is also meant to help disambiguate between two artists of the same name—see Curtis Macdonald. In addition to referencing more verifiable 3rd party sources, is there anything else that will help to ultimately reduce confusion between two composers of same name? Cmacsound (talk) 09:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC) Cmacsound (talk) 09:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I have added several more references to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Robert_Schleip where authors refer to Robert Schleip in their books. So I will resubmit the article again. Thanks --Maharani303 (talk) 10:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation: International Fall Workshops on Geometry and Physics (November 27)

Dear SwisterTwister, A series of international conferences devoted to an important scientific interface (mathematics and physics), and with a track record of almost 25 years, would seem to be notable! The webpages of the meetings, where available, are provided. The only other references I could add are bibliographic references to the published proceedings volumes. Would the article then be acceptable? Thanks. Iberian15 Iberian15 (talk) 13:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added third party references for Florida Bureau of Braille and Talking Books Library entry

Thank you for pointing out the lack of third party sources on the Florida Bureau of Braille and Talking Books Library article. I added various third party sources, as well as additional information. Although, I considered the Florida Library History Project to be a third party source as it was written by subject-matter experts on regional library history. Various Table Manners (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:UK Shaolin Temple

--M Niven (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)</ M Niven> Hello David, Thanskyou for taking the time to relook at my article. It has taken me a couple of attempts as I not very technical person. I have resubmitted more third party references and put links in there too to other wiki pages and also included a biog too. Is there anything else that you can suggest. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:UK_Shaolin_Temple Many thanks for your time</ M NIven>[reply]

Afc: Etta Federn

Dear David, Thank you for reading my article. I'm sorry that you felt Etta Federn lacks notability, particularly given that Wiki has been making an effort to include more women, in order to correct the imbalance in its entries. Etta Federn published 25 books in Germany before World War II; she had a voice and a power that few women attained in that era. Please let me know what I can do to improve the article. Many thanks, Gecko990 Gecko990 (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just would refer to some of the German sources, including an entry in Salomon Winingers Jewish encyclopedia, a chapter in Heuer and Heid and various press entries and reviews. Noteable for sure. Polentarion Talk 20:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your advice, dear Polentarion! I will add more sources, as you suggest. Gecko990 (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Youre welcome. My article on Andreas Anton is two sections above, so I did some drive by shooting. I have brought various anarchists to the German DYK mainpage section, so thats a pleasure for me to be of help. Polentarion Talk 22:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Polentarion, That's the first time I've ever appreciated a drive-by shooting! I've added even more sources to Etta, in addition to the ones you so kindly put in, and I fleshed out the article more. I've resubmitted, and we'll see if it's good to go now. Vielen vielen Dank for your help! Gecko990 (talk) 11:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20:04:46, 3 December 2015 review of submission by Hjp3697

Hjp3697 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:USF Health (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The content of the page has been edited to meet Wikipedia guidelines. Specifically, the tone has been adjusted to read with neutrality. Please, note that all the content includes citations. Please, also see this Wikipedia page, as a reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_South_Florida.

20:23:51, 3 December 2015 review of submission by Agnes.Szabo.1

Agnes.Szabo.1 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Éberség Intelligencia (AQ) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, the below was approved by the Hungarian Wikipedia - as it is supported by topic-independent, still specialist sources -. This page is a translation of that. Or, would you please explain the difference between the HU and the EN Wikipedia rules? Many thanks, Agi

Agnes.Szabo.1 Well, to be honest, there's not even much currently with that draft and what there is simply looks like an advertisement complete with words such "our". Instead, add better information and in-depth third-party sources such as news, journals and magazines overall. Also, in case you're not aware of it, WP:Referencing for beginners shows you how to better format the listed sources. I'm not an active user at Hungarian Wiki but the English Wiki is known to be more active of course and have higher standards. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 20:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The 99 (TV series)

The information on it seems an improvement, but I can't figure out the warnings that it gives when I try to accept. The references section seems different, but I don't see the open one, or the one out of place. Any ideas?Naraht (talk) 01:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The People's Alliance (Durham, NC)

Hi SwisterTwister. I've done some copy edits on the above draft and wonder if you have time to take another look. -- Diannaa (talk) 03:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ~! --Diannaa (talk) 03:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The People's Alliance (Durham, NC) has been accepted

The People's Alliance (Durham, NC), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 03:41, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:22:28, 4 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Dinowin

Dinowin (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Moovah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My article on Moovah was not accepted. The reference that I have mentioned are not valid. Please help me to publish this article. I just have these references only.

Rajashree

Dinowin (talk) 05:22, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:22:26, 4 December 2015 review of submission by KaranChopra271

KaranChopra271 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ananya Soni (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The sources I have used are reliable news outlets and websites, including official websites for the pageants and official commentators.

Yes KaranChopra271 but there simply are not enough as mentioned with my comment. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any more available in-depth third-party sources overall as mentioned. By the way, there's no need to add another section for your comment, simply comment below my comment. SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Simply edit the last section where I commented like above KaranChopra271 and, as for the sources, it is because there simply are not enough to fully satisfy the notability guidelines I mentioned at the draft. SwisterTwister talk 07:09, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:17:29, 4 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Shyamw1

Shyamw1 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

The article I submitted yesterday was rejected - I don't understand the reason of "notability" and hence this note. I was merely adding to an article that already existed about the subject. I found additional material in secondary sources which I have included in the inline citations and references. Not sure what I need to do to improve it. Please help.

Shyamw1 (talk) 13:17, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Rocky Mountain Radar

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rocky Mountain Radar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not sure how a page can be promotional when half of it refers to official investigations saying it was worthless. May well not be notable, but there's enough for A7. Thank you. Ged UK 13:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:36:57, 4 December 2015 review of submission by Aparker42

Aparker42 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Joel Snyder (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister:

Thank you for your review of the proposed article on Dr. Joel Snyder. I would appreciate it if you could specify:

- what material suggested copyright violations, - how the article can further indicate Dr. Snyder's notability beyond the significant awards, accomplishments, and his position as a pioneer in the development of audio description, and its principal exponent internationally over the last 35 years (these items are noted within the submitted article).

Many thanks for your assistance. It would be important to the field of audio description and its consumers (over 21 million people in the United States alone) to have this article accepted by Wickipedia.

Cordially,

Anthony Parker Aparker42 (talk) 15:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wales Green Party

Hi, I see that you reviewed the page. This has been the subject of a heated discussion as to whether or not is should be merged into Green Party of England and Wales. What is really needed is a neutral senior editor to look at the arguments for and against and close the review so that it is not felt that any particular vested interest has 'won' by closing it (as has happened before). If you have the time to do this, that would be great. Thanks. Btljs (talk) 16:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:12:49, 4 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Etruscanpress

Etruscanpress (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Philip Brady (poet) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, it has come to my attention that my writing of this article is a conflict of interest. Is there a way that I can pass along the writing of this article to another person without losing the work I've done so far? Thanks for all your help, reviewers! Etruscanpress (talk) 21:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Etruscanpress (talk) 21:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:59:18, 4 December 2015 review of submission by Fanaticalglobe

Fanaticalglobe (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kieran Max Goodwin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

"Comment: Not sure if there's enough for a solidly independently notable article"

Added more information regarding the individual. Hope this helps.

Please let me know.

Sorry but I'm simply not seeing much for satisfying notability, Fanaticalglobe. SwisterTwister talk 23:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry, all very new at this. The article has since been adjusted and will most probably be declined again. Will seek more notable articles about the individual. But for now, I am struggling to find anymore. Fanaticalglobe (talk) 00:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:04:48, 5 December 2015 review of submission by W. Brry

W. Brry (talk · contribs)
- User:W. Brry/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like a Re-Review on my article. The original intent was not to be a recipe guide but to show how and where the Kool-Aid pie originated. There are several versions out there, that's why I included the ingredients. I could leave out how it's made. I looked at some other food articles and while they did not include how to prepare them, I do think I remember reference to ingredients. I would like some assist on how to improve my article so it is accepted into Wikipedia please. Thank you.W. Brry (talk) 01:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:27:31, 5 December 2015 review of submission by MMZANetworx

MMZANetworx (talk · contribs)
- User:MMZANetworx/sandbox/Conquerors Sporting Club (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, the Conquerors Sporting Club is a new first division team that was just established and as time goes on we will obviously add many references.

At this stage it is confirmed by the Ghana Rugby Football Union as per references, and very influential independent news media such as the Ghana News Agency, Peace FM and Modern Ghana has already reported on the Club.

It is just like Blue Bulls but just very new and in smaller rugby union country.

Can we please get it published on Wikipedia?

11:52:18, 5 December 2015 review of submission by 41.190.14.104

41.190.14.104 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Biafranedu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

how will i write some news to support my article: 41.190.14.104 (talk) 11:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

prods

When nominating a person for regular prod, it helps to give some indication of his field. That way people can check the ones they are likely to know about. DGG ( talk ) 21:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21:12:30, 5 December 2015 review of submission by Pianogac

Pianogac (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Olga Jegunova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello

I have made several additions to the references since you said that the Olga Jegunova draft article "was getting closer" on November 24. Have you had chance to look at the more recent version?

Cheers

Geoff (pianogac)

Articles Created in Mainspace

Hello SwisterTwister, how are you? Over the past few days you declined two drafts that I worked on as non-notable. I believe that those subjects are notable, which is why I created those drafts. Anyway, I have created those drafts as articles in main space. If you believe that they are not notable, please take them to AFD. Remitly and Francis Bitonti.

I would like to keep working in the AFC. For future, how about if you send over drafts to me of subjects that you think are really notable. My interest is in editing articles about Visual artists. Thanks.Susana Hodge (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:48:44, 6 December 2015 review of submission by JeanetteW407

JeanetteW407 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:David Ward (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, I have now fully sourced cited the first reference in this article: Dalton, Stephen. I was led to believe that once I did this my article would be complete. Please can you advise? Thank You. JeanetteW407 (talk) 10:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Pilsner Urquell"

Thanks for looking.

Pilsner - one of the best beer - from Pilsen (Czech). Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz (talk) 17:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Needs some help

Hi. I've created some pages. Two of them, I've choose and I want you help me in improving these pages; Javed Hayat Abdul Karim Karimi I will be very grateful to you for this favour.

Regards Khesrawkakakhail (talk) 19:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 November 30#Vu Digital

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vu Digital (2nd nomination), you wrote "Delete for now" and the AfD was closed as "delete". At Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 November 30#Vu Digital, I asked for the community's permission to restore the history under the redirect so I can merge material to C Spire Wireless, the parent company.

I will only merge material sourced to TechCrunch, Mississippi Business Journal, Broadcasting & Cable, and The Clarion-Ledger, which all pass Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. I will not merge any material sourced only to press releases or sources that fail Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Would you support this? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 19:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Cunard. SwisterTwister talk 19:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, SwisterTwister! Would you comment about your thoughts about my proposal at the DRV, so editors know that as a "delete" participant, you are open to undeleting the history to facilitate a merge? Cunard (talk) 19:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote, "Restore and merge if it is actually beneficial as a merge can be made even if the article will still be deleted." Per Wikipedia:Merge and delete, a merge requires that the attribution history of an article be preserved.

Do you mean "Restore and merge if it is actually beneficial as a merge can be made even if the article will still be redirected." instead? Cunard (talk) 19:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I suppose if the history is needed then, redirect yes. SwisterTwister talk 19:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you clarify your comment at the DRV regarding deletion/redirection? Thank you, Cunard (talk) 20:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:05:54, 6 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by 24.36.64.112

24.36.64.112 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Steve Sinnicks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

After adding countless citations, links to verifiable sources, etc. there still seems to be issue with this submission. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Steve_Sinnicks The artist has been featured on CBC (National News & Information), The Hamilton Spectator (major market newspaper, part of the national chain Metroland Media), won Hamilton Music Awards for "Recording Of The Year" twice, City of Hamilton Arts Award for "Established Artist", played and recorded with many other major artists - who also play and appear on his recordings, interviewed and reviewed in national music magazines (Exclaim! and Chart Attack), played at major events and festivals including the nationally noted NXNE and Canada Music Week and charted on independent radio stations across the country. These all fit the definitions and guidelines for both notability and "reputable sources, independent of the topic/subject".

What else am I possibly missing? --24.36.64.112 (talk) 22:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

24.36.64.112 (talk) 22:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Links in PROD nominations

Hi, thanks for improving Wikipedia by proposing deletion of unjustified articles. May I suggest that you link abbreviations such as AfD and WP:TNT, to be more friendly to newcomers? e.g. in [6] Keep up the good work! – Fayenatic London 10:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:39:51, 7 December 2015 review of submission by Clipfunu

Clipfunu (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Eyal ben-Moshe (Eyal B) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Please review since I place 14 References and they are all from major sites in Israel! thanks Clipfunu (talk) 11:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Clipfunu and SwisterTwister: It might be worth asking at WP:ISRAEL or similar to check the references - some of them look like they could be good but I can't tell myself. Sam Walton (talk) 08:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) @Clipfunu and SwisterTwister: Hi, accoring to Israel they are very good (They are used all the time) and Eyal has an Hebrew article on Hebrew wiki. Can you approve the draft or what should I do? Clipfunu (talk) 10:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Note

Thanks for the note on my talk page. Even though I rarely find the time to edit, I still browse as my logged in name, check my messages etc. Every now and then, I archive my talk page to get rid of all the automated messages that seem to pile up. Anyways, thanks for the note on my talk page, It is nice to know that somebody notices when you are there and when you are not. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 16:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:44:53, 7 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by VicFury

VicFury (talk · contribs)
- Draft:US Coast Guard Counterintelligence Service (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The info received was that the USCG Counterintelligence Service is not notable. it is a US government intelligence agency and that is notable enough. In addition, I provided the link and bio for the current Director of that agency.

Please assist in helping to create this page as it is a known US agency within the USCG.

Thank you.

VicFury (talk) 16:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)==Ronnie[reply]

Ronnie Apteker

Hi Sister Twister

I have made a few amendments to the Ronnie Apteker - removed perceived promotional tone and added two good refs from Forbes magazine and Cape Times. I am still a little perturbed regarding your comments re Internet Solutions and R.A - the former is a piece of corporate promotional tripe with little merit, whereas Ronnie Apteker has surely a much greater claim to notability. See also his former partner's page - David Frankel - another piece of self-promotion that seems to have escaped the editor's attention. Surely this idea of one rule for one and another rule for another is not only unfair to contributors but damages Wikipedia's credibility? Picknick99 (talk) 19:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

00:58:44, 8 December 2015 review of submission by Entroporium

Entroporium (talk · contribs)
- Draft:WideOrbit (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

SisterTwister, I am miffed!

I believe I have offered everything you asked for and been true to the golden rule.

Significance: 36 references in a 370 word entry; I challenge any other business's wikipedia entry to match that rate of links to words. Software that runs 70%+ of US TV stations. Four funding rounds.
Reliable and Independent Sources: My 36 citations come from 18 discrete and totally legitimate media sources.

In addition, I have avoided marketing fluff, provided a whole lot of internal wiki links, and avoided the usual business rathole of trying to get in every last bit of history of product development, executive hires and so forth. Like these guys: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janrain or this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KIT_Digital

I look forward to hearing from you :- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Entroporium (talk • contribs) 00:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13:27:06, 8 December 2015 review of submission by Petpan089

Petpan089 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Yachtico (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, aren't Floridas three largest newspapers Suns Sentinel, Palm Beach Post and the Florida Business Journal very valid sources? If you google the five year old company you will find a lot about them all over the news: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22yachtico%22&tbm=nws since the beginning in 2011. What further sources would you recommend for citiation? There is also on of the founders and key people who has his own Wikipedia page.

Denny Somach

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Denny Somach, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! --Moonriddengirl ^(talk)

Request on 13:46:56, 8 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Eaprins

Eaprins (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Onno Greiner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister, Thanks for your review. The first reviewer told me: 'Please provide more references. This is a good draft, but it needs more sources.' So I did, and you wrote, 'Not entirely commenting about its notability but this will need any more available sources overall.'

Maybe you could say more directly what you are missing? Or is it an option to make the article shorter (just mention data and the most important projects)? I would really like to complete this article about an inspiring Dutch architect.

Best regards, Eaprins (talk) 13:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eaprins (talk) 13:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:34:57, 8 December 2015 review of submission by PoorRicardo

PoorRicardo (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Astor Hotel (Tianjin) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have added a reference from a CNN article. This is a George Washington slept here type of place in China. On the disambiguation page, it is notably unlinked to an article among the many Astor Hotels that are linked. This is my first ever article for Wikipedia and I would love to chat with you more about how to do a good job. Thanks, PoorRicardo (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:44:30, 8 December 2015 review of submission by Wodnikprasowy

Wodnikprasowy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:International Sailing Schools Association (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your review SwisterTwister. I do understand the purpose of wikipedia and have no intention to making an advertisement there. Yet somehow I cannot understand the difference between my submission and for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Yachting_Association, which is basically very similar organization. I can delete some adjectives like „successfully”, but this will only steal information from the submission. Where does advertisement start? I’m not telling there that the organization is super, extra, wonderful and beautiful. But I do want to mention achievements and describe the scope of activity. What kind of reliable, published sources can you find on the RYA entry, apart for the material produced by the creator? Mine submission has at least some sources other than that. Regards Wodnikprasowy (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for reviewing all of the articles that my students finished this semester! I appreciate your help. --RichardMcCoy (talk) 17:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:04:04, 8 December 2015 review of submission by Swelch12

Swelch12 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Carbon Engineering (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi - my submission was rejected due to references, however, I included reputable sources including Fast Company, NPR, CBC News, Nature, Toronto Star, New York Times and FORTUNE. I talked to the live desk and they were stumped on the rejection due to sources. Would it be possible to get some advice on what can be added to help get approval?

Swelch12 (talk) 18:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)swelch12[reply]

04:23:26, 9 December 2015 review of submission by Sergem1

Sergem1 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Waterstart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

Could you please elaborate what is exactly wrong with the draft: reference source quality (I was trying to get something that could be verified online, not by hunting Windsurifng Magazine archives) or whether waterstart is a notable windsurfing maneuver (It is an essential skills for sailing high winds, it would be safe to say that half of all windsurfers in the world do it several times during their sessions)?

Thank you! Sergem1 (talk) 04:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please help! Sergem1 (talk) 03:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Found your comment, thanks Sergem1 (talk) 03:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability: Agarwal Packers and Movers

Hi Swister Twister, I wanted to get your advice after your review of the article. Am I flogging a dead horse here? I thought I had enough to get the article over the line but I guess that wasn't your take on it. I know the removalist industry is not that exciting a starting point for creating a Wikipedia career and I've spent so much time learning about it and reading articles about it that I'm reluctant to give up on it....I think there are cruddier less deserving articles that have been accepted into Wikipedia (though admitted I haven't seen one for a while). But there does reach a point where I may need to be told if the subject matter is inherently un-notable and is never going to make it, so that I can find a new hobby to write about. Anyway, your feedback would be great. Where am I going wrong? Or is because the topic is salted due to previous puff pieces being done? (not sure if you knew this, but I found some of the history...and this topic has had some really crap articles written for it). Cheers Alokibees (talk) 05:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:09:35, 9 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Gaur07

Gaur07 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Winjit Technologies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, I have made the changes in my draft..I have added the notable resources..can you please have a look.

Gaur07 (talk) 06:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:29:16, 9 December 2015 review of submission by 14.99.101.177

14.99.101.177 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sumana Mukherjee (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

please let me know why it has not been published, where are the loops and what i need to do to improve it.

06:30:36, 9 December 2015 review of submission by Gaur07

Gaur07 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Winjit Technologies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

SwisterTwister..I have added reliable resources to the text. I tried to balance out my text and resources for the page. I will add content gradually with proper citations. Can you please now review the text? Let me know if I have to make any changes to the drafts.

06:50:14, 9 December 2015 review of submission by Ekvastra

Ekvastra (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Hindu Economic System (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can I add references to the article in draft space or should I move it to userspace, improve and then submit again? --Ekvastra (talk) 06:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

9 December 2015 - notability requirements for AfC by Kentunderstand

Hi SwisterTwister - thanks for taking another look at my submission. I'm puzzled about the notability requirements. As there are four separate articles from TechCrunch, and another from Bloomberg Business, I'm not sure what kind of coverage would be better - any advice?

Kentunderstand (talk) 13:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:06:12, 9 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by ForeitN

ForeitN (talk · contribs)
- Draft:William J. Perry Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm sending this message trying to figure out why my submission for wikipedia was declined. It was cited for lack of notability. I am somewhat confused, as the four other Defense Security Cooperation Agency (Part of US Dept of Defense) regional centers (George C. Marshall Center for European Security Studies, Near East South Asia Center for Security Studies, Africa Center for Security Studies, and the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies have entries in wikipedia, and some of them have even less reference material that is even valid.

Would adding more references to the entry help with the submission? If so, what sort of references would be suggested?

Thank you for your help.

ForeitN (talk) 14:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:21:30, 9 December 2015 review of submission by Jgreene1333

Jgreene1333 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ken Seiff (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Added substantial new content, including WSJ blog, NY Times, 2 books, trade publications, and NY Post articles

Jgreene1333 (talk) 16:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)jgreene1333[reply]

Request on 16:22:17, 9 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mds43

Mds43 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Catapult Chicago (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have submitted the Catapult Chicago page several times. I have cited sources and referenced articles to make the entry both "notable" and "objective". I do not understand how/why it keeps getting rejected. Mds43 (talk) 16:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Teller and the Truth

Thank you for taking the time to review the page I created. In your comments you asked that I "Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia." The film I have created the page for premiered at the Austin Film Festival, has been picked up for distribution, and will be available on iTunes, Amazon, and Netflix, starting in February. I have several more sources of information I can include for references but because the film has not yet premiered widely I do not have national critic reviews just yet. I can link to the film's website and imdb page, would that help? My main question is what I do now to get the page created?

Thank you for your time!

paintbynumberss

Paintbynumberss (talk) 21:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Altered States declined

Thank you for taking the time to review my article at Draft:Altered States: a cyberpunk sci-fi anthology. WendigoUK (talk) 21:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:47:43, 10 December 2015 review of submission by Chis Maxwell

Chis Maxwell (talk · contribs)
- Draft:James Chisholm (Senior) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I note my article on James Chisholm (Senior) has been rejected based on a lack of notability ["While most historical subjects are accepted, I'm simply not seeing the solid notability here"], suggesting the addition of more (independent) secondary sources and improvement of referencing. I have currently included some 40 primary sources in this article. With very few exceptions, the only major second source is the biography of the man's life that has just been published (The Merchant of Sydney). At the launch of this book, Emeritus Professor Brian Fletcher, one of Australia's most distinguished historians of early colonial history, said it was extraordinary that such a prominent colonial identity had, to date, "slipped through the historian's net" and had "been sorely neglected for some two centuries". As Professor Fletcher says, James Chisholm has been largely ignored for more than 200 years, and yet he was the equal of many who already feature strongly in the articles of Wikipedia, and certainly exceeds many others in notability. He was a major early entrepreneur and merchant; responsible. possibly only secondary to Robert Campbell, for opening up significant trade with Bengal; he owned a large area of the early town of Sydney; he was selected by Governor Macquarie as a member of his Governor's Court (apart from the Judge Advocate, there was only one other member); he owned the first Bank of New South Wales of which he was a founding shareholder and Director; and he was widely acclaimed as one of Sydney's most respected early citizens. He has been neglected by history because he was a modest man who did not promote himself, and did not leave a collection of documents. I have tried to avoid rhetoric and stuck to the facts. I am able to add many more primary sources to this article, if this is required. However, the only other secondary sources that mention him are already cited. Can you please advise on how I should proceed? With thanks Chis Maxwell

Marek Piwowski

This person is IMHO certainly notable, as a director of major movies (see The Cruise (1970 film), the red links in the article need some redirects). Also, note the entry at [7]. It is my opinion that for biographies of Polish artist, having an article about oneself at culture.pl is a sufficient criteria for being notable (reliable in-depth coverage); culure.pl IMHO is akin to an online encyclopedia of Polish culture. If there are any other bios by that editor you'd like me to review, let me know, I looked at one more and it appears notable. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:57:51, 10 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by ProSOSeng

ProSOSeng (talk · contribs)
- Draft:StarOfService (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, Thank you for reviewing my article. I have put a lot of newspapers references (french like les echos, or english like Techcrunch or Entrepreneur India). the articles are about either the globalisation of the companies or the annual survey who's doing the media buzz each year with the top three regions for entrepreneurship in France. I don't really know which kind of articles more i can find on this startup. Could you help me on this ? Thanks a lot (ProSOSeng (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2015 (UTC) ProSOSeng (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:52:36, 10 December 2015 review of submission by Renglish00

Renglish00 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Insight Global (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I am completely new to making Wikipedia articles and would like some guidance. I read your comments but would like to know exactly what was not sufficient about the sources referenced. I used the article for Allegis Group as an example while writing this article and felt they had met similar standards. If you could please advise which sources are not in-depth enough, I would appreciate it.

Corporate Brain

For your information, Corporate Brain, which you accepted, has been nominated for deletion and is now being discussed at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

02:09:33, 11 December 2015 review of submission by Carll253

Carll253 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Conversica (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you give more insight on why you feel the entry is not notable? I read the guidelines on notable, and feel that the third party awards that the company has received give the company the notability that is required. Thanks Carll253 (talk) 02:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admiral Markets article resubmission

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you for your comment that you left on the Admiral Markets page. I have updated the references now. Can you please check and approve? If there is any issue then please let me know. Thanks. Ifr ko (talk) 12:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please suggest how we can improve his page & make him a part of the wikipedia. Thanks Anubhav Anubhav (talk) 11:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SwisterTwister, Happy new years. It has been a long time now, can you please check the article? Thanks. Ifr ko (talk) 08:34, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

re: Seoul Independent Film Festival

This article is written by a student of mine, and I think it's a notable topic - the article already cites three newspapers (one in English) that focus on the festival. GNews search also brings up [8]. Google shows it has an entry on English language Korean government official tourism site, [9]. There is stuff like [10]. I think the topic is notable enough for a "recurring event" (Wikipedia:Notability (events), and although I am a bit biased (my student), you know I am also not the one to promote spam... so could you reconsider your decline here? We could take it to AfD, if you'd insist. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Piotrus, I agree with you that it's notable, but perhaps you can get the student to rewrite it in sentences, not bullet points. DGG ( talk ) 23:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DGG She did it at Draft:Seoul Independent Film Festival. I didn't realize there was another worse copy of the draft in mainspace... was it deleted and restored? It's a bit ironic we have a poor article in mainspace and her attempts to move her better draft out there have been rejected. PS. SwisterTwister, would you mind telling me why are you ignoring this thread? Tomorrow is the last day of the class and I still can't tell her that her article is fine. Sigh. Wikipedia is NOT friendly to newbies - case in point. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Piotrus, I've been busy around here and frankly I also haven't been motivated as usual here (because of some uncomfortable events recently), but I would say it's best to work and make the current article better before we take it to AfD (unless you want others to comment, for that matter). I would also say drafting and userfying is an option for now. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sam, could you do me a favor and move it to the mainspace (merging article histories), and if you want, take it to AfD then? I think it's notable as it is, and I don't think more work is needed here (for proving notability). The only problem I see is that the student, without asking, worked on it in the annoying draft userspace, rather then in Sandboxes. I find drafts very bad - they let through a ton of spam, and then add a layer of bureaucracy on the good articles like this. If I knew how that damn system works, I'd have approved it myself, but I am stuck having to ask somebody familiar with this (you or DGG) to mainspace the article. Once it is there, again, feel free to AfD it if you feel this needs further review. Thanks, PS. Don't let the wikistress get to you. In the past the best remedy for me was to ignore flamewars and just write some new content. DYK something and you'll feel better. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who's "Sam"?

I'm now userfying it, yes. Cheers Piotrus and what always makes me feel better is simply knowing there are still amicable and beneficial users here.

SwisterTwister talk 07:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, for some reason I was thinking of you as SamTwister; maybe your username run into my semi-automated pun detection and destruction system. Wikipedia can be a grueling experience sometimes; but writing content helped me survive my darker days here, even when I felt that most of the "community" wanted to crucify me, I kept writing for the general public. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:31:03, 11 December 2015 review of submission by Dshargrett

Dshargrett (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Jamison Ross (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

I have added a line at the end of the article that should establish notability. Please advise.

Thanks,

David

Trove and AustLit

I removed the deletion notice at Goldie Alexander because I found a detailled biography of her and reviews of her work at Trove and a different biography and information on her awards at AustLit. While AustLit focuses on Australian authors, Trove might be more broadly useful when assessing pages for deletion. In particular, Trove's 'people' search allows you to find works about a person, not just by them. Please consider adding these sources to your pre-deletion search when appropriate. Thank you. --211.30.17.74 (talk) 01:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Simpel-Fonetik Method of Writing

Hi SwisterTwister, I have removed the child lit project from the above talkpage as i don't think the article is under the purview of the project. But, i have also added a couple of projects which appear more appropriate, hope this is okay? ps. you do awesome work!

Coolabahapple (talk) 02:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Oussama_Belhcen

Hi SwisterTwister. I've done some edits on the draft Draft:Oussama_Belhcen and wonder if you have time to take a look at it. -- Othmanebenjelloun (talk) thank you. —Preceding undated comment added 10:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Anil Gupta

Hi SwisterTwister. Thanks on your previous reviews of the article. I've added more links to primary sources as well as a section, with links, on discussions of Gupta's work.

I feel I need to add that the notability of contemporary authors who work in technical fields such as logic often does not correspond with a high online presence or linkable articles in news outlets. In all honesty, I really think that, within the discipline in which Gupta works, the article in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy on the Revision Theory suffices to show his notability: he developed an original theory of truth which is a rival of theories proposed by people like Kripke. That alone is a major contribution achieved by very few people who work in the discipline. I recognize the importance of Wikipedia's notability criteria, however, and hope that I have now done enough to show Gupta's notability. I hope you'll have time to look over the draft again; I look forward to your feedback.

Many thanks, 44 DFW (talk) 17:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Proposed deletion

Ta for the Thanks but really, you shouldn't encourage me. Prod-2 is - at best - a good babysteps exercise for wannabe serious deleters; for me its a notorious timewaster and a terrible temptation to exercise the sort of concise honesty that pisses the admins right off. I just held back from this (an SPA about his aristocratic name, who'll write an article on every family member that ever had a job if we let it) because its 4 days ago and its all of course entirely pointless. Just amusing myself for the risk of the getting told off by the po-faced twat doing the deletion. But then, if I did make you smile, it was worth it. All the best. Plutonium27 (talk) 22:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peter von Puttkamer

Considering the awards, Isuggesafd, not prod. Personally, I have no opinion one way or another. DGG ( talk ) 23:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:23:18, 14 December 2015 review of submission by Otherbin

Otherbin (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Samuel Colman (Publisher) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for looking at my article on Samuel Colman. This is my first article. I don't quite understand about the citations. It seems as if I have plenty of references/links. Could you pick out a specific sentence or paragraph and tell me what kind of citation it needs? Thanks. I really appreciate your help. Otherbin (talk) 06:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Otherbin Simply needs any more available sources as mentioned as I'm simply not convinced all of the listed ones fully satisfy and suggest notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ODNB

I noticed [11]. But a full article in DNB has been regarded in many AfD decisions as proof of notability, even without anything else--and in fact we have many bio articles based on it alone. The same is true for similarly selective national bibliographies of other countries. DGG ( talk ) 17:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review Request

Kindly review another page that I created two days back: Śrāvaka (Jainism). Thank you-जैन (talk) 03:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) -जैन (talk) 03:34, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Cloudcade Re-Review and Update

Hi Swister, since you last reviewed the article, I've managed to isolate more sources that are as recent as Dec regarding the notoriety of the Company. Please take a look at the source from PocketGamer as this should now meet the criterias you mentioned with the missing of current sources. Please re-view and help me publish the article, thanks!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cloudcade

The Miracles Sing Modern

Please see all references included with article. At least four different albums by The Miracles refer to this album's existence...(including two of them by Official Miracles biographer Stu Hackel) in Motown Records' liner notes in those albums. Many Thanks, Willgee (talk) 05:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reviewing Liam Zammit an article I wrote. Xender Lourdes (talk) 13:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:40:16, 16 December 2015 review of submission by 74.205.144.26

74.205.144.26 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Group Publishing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Additional references and information added.

How to get resolve the 'not enough sources' feedback on Article for Creation

Hi, I've noticed there's a draft for Ennismore, with the comment that there isn't enough sources. I'm interested in writing about this topic. How many sources/ what type of sources would be required? Can you give any examples of what you feel would be appropriate?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alicetate (talk • contribs) 16:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Check

Hello , you are an exprienced editor, I think this band Arsames is not notable enough. please check. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 17:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re-review article

Hi SwisterTwister,

In reference to the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zesty.io, I've taken your suggestions into consideration and added several more credible sources over the past month or so. I think this is what you were looking for... If you wouldn't mind reviewing and providing more feedback, that would be much appreciated!

Best,

D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.183.165.106 (talk) 17:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What facts have I to refer with which kind of sources?

Hi Dear! I am working at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Form . I just deleted all refs to make them again. Please, explain in several words, which facts i can refer with official program website, for example, and what with third-party articles, and etc... have i to refer simply each sentence? i am trying to do it in the way like other programs are described. I have a lot of information about what i write, but don't understand which one to use in the certain sentence... Also, could I rename Draft:Form to Draft:QForm, because the program i write about is QForm, not Form - i didnt name it so. Also, can i use russian sources to refer? Thank you a lot. Glad to hear from you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mskpetrov (talk • contribs) 08:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, whatever available solid in-depth third-party sources overall there are Mskpetrov. SwisterTwister talk 08:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

From what I understand the problem is that you consider the page to be advertising and it contains no references. While I do work in the marketing department of the company I should point out the pages were not meant as advertising, and apologize if it seemed that way. They were written just to offer people a simpler way to get information about the subjects. While we are trying to provide people with a service to reduce invisible lost time the page doesn’t refer to our product, nor does it point to it since there is quite a few companies with similar products. It only points out that it was first developed and used by Statoil and TDE, which is understandable since our managing director has a doctorate in petroleum engineering and has researched it extensively, the main page for the TDE Group is a brief description of the company and the companies within it.

If you could please just write me what needs to be added/Removed from/to the pages I can do it.

Thank you

Josko wk (talk) 09:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have a WP:COI, please follow the suggestions here. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 09:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subject's notability not adequate

Hi SwisterTwister!

Thank you for reviewing my Draft:The 120 Media Collective. I've read the rules and added references from legitimate news websites and press sources to add to the subject's notability. Have deleted a bunch of it due to previous declined submissions. Please could you help suggest what to add to in terms of notability? Have mentioned awards won and the sources are all verifiable too. Would a table of awards work?

Thank you in advance. Roshni3423 (talk) 10:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Query

My page for 'Texas Studies in Literature and Language' was declined owing to lack of notability. I am genuinely puzzled by this rationale, as the journal had a vacant link on the entry for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Texas_Press (where 5 of 11 similar journals already have Wikipedia pages). The journal is one of the oldest continually-published academic journals in the States, and is indexed in all the major places. It is difficult to understand (sincerely) how TSLL is less notable than hundreds of other academic journals that currently have Wikipedia pages.

For the record, here are the other journals that currently possess pages just from this press alone:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinema_Journal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_%26_Culture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_the_History_of_Sexuality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Latin_American_Geography [[12]]

Please let me know how I can highlight TSLL's notability in a manner that equates to the entries above. Thank you! B802818827 (talk) 01:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03:23:14, 18 December 2015 review of submission by Rasmussene

Rasmussene (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Linton Wells II (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister,

I need, please, a little help in determining how this entry for Lin Wells lacks third-party validation. He's a former Assistant Secretary of Defense, the first Department of Defense CIO, author of several definitive works in defense and humanitarian assistance, and created entire sections of the disaster relief policies that the US Department of Defense now uses in places like the Banda Aceh tsunami, Supertyphoon Haiyan, and Katrina. He lectures governments all over the world and is a personal advisor to Ashraf Ghani, the President of Afghanistan (though we won't mention that in the article), and your Elonka Dunin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elonka_Dunin) asked him at DEFCON in Las Vegas why he didn't have an entry. She has volunteered to talk with anyone about a submission for him but I rather just get it right on my own. I've admired him for years and took this on voluntarily as a gesture of respect, but I seem to be messing it up. Based on the September rejection I've contributed quite a few third-party references. What's missing that might help?

To be clear, I'm not objecting to the rejection - I'm trying to accept your critique. But it seems I need a little help. Thanks for your advice.

Eric Eric Rasmussen, MD, MDM, FACP (talk) 03:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold page

Hello SwisterTwister,

Thank you very much for posting the article I submitted, Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold.

I want to note that I am an employee of Manifest, a marketing agency representing Abbott Vascular. I have made some edit requests on the Talk pages of other stent-related Wikipedia pages, and a disclaimer has appeared with those requests (see, for example, Talk:Percutaneous coronary intervention). There is a mention of my affiliation on the talk page of the new Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold article (somehow this was copied over from a posting I made on "Wikipedia talk: WikiProject Medicine").

But please let me know if you advise that I should add any specific disclaimer information on the new Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold article. We want to ensure that we are compliant with Wikipedia requirements.

Thank you again.

Tom at Manifest (talk) 22:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnie Apteker

Hello SisterTwister. I have tried to make contact a couple of times to ask for help and advice, but so far no response. I wanted to tell you that a) I added some further refs to the page and b), more surprisingly, I see that a Ronnie Apteker page was created as long ago as 2010 and voted a 'Keep' after someone questioned notability. It seems unusual that a page would be deemed ok five years ago, but not today when so many improvements have been made to it. Can't we all stick by the rules and the decisions? I am puzzled as to why the Ronnie Apteker page was turned into a Redirect to Internet Solutions, and yet no mention is made on Apteker on that page, which seems a pretty dumb use of a redirect. Picknick99 (talk) 22:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for

reviewing my new article, Aiyangiyang! -Darouet (talk) 00:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not logged in user

Are you affiliated with any of the following users?

MB298 (talk) 01:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I was actually about to send you a message as well MB298, I am absolutely not and it seems they're not even registered accounts! I am even convinced they may've started all of these new accounts (see these new "userpages"). SwisterTwister talk 01:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had noticed Notloggedin had started over a dozen userpages; each copying the exact content of your own userpage (including the two above). At first I thought that they had clicked on several redlinked userpages and copy-pasted the data into them, but then it appeared the users had no talk page and no contributions. MB298 (talk) 01:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MB298 Yes and fortunately both Diannaa and Mike V have cleaned all of the troubles, it's worth noting they stated copying and pasting Diannaa's userpage as well so you may've been the next one.

Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 02:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Log

Yeah I know. Maybe it's tiredness but I found myself laughing at Not Log's silliness and thought I'd make a joke with Diannaa. I do that sometimes.

Oh and while I'm here, my best wishes to you for Christmas. I've seen you around since I've been here. Slight Smile 02:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD for User:Aleuuhhmsc/sandbox

Hi. I removed all the unnecessary content from my sandbox, User:Aleuuhhmsc/sandbox, so this issue should be resolved. So then, I'd like to get the MfD thing removed from it, please. It's starting to piss me off now. Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 03:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag on Maryann Krieglstein Comment

Thank you for taking the time to review this article and publish it out of Articles for Creation. I'm curious about your interpretation of the COI tag. Specifically, if you think the peer review from the Articles for Creation process is sufficient to remove it or if further peer review is necessary. Or if it should remain indefinably.

On a side note: I think this process worked great for COI publishing and we should recommend anyone trying to push a COI article to go to AFC for support and peer review. I've already started doing so with new editors. Of course, only after pointing them to the COI literature about what is appropriate.

Cheers. --Dkriegls (talk to me!) 11:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki page for Dr. Ramaswamy

Hi my username is anubhavsingh1987. I am writing about the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hosahalli_S._Ramaswamy. For Dr. Ramaswamy, criteria 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) are satisfied. He has 400 research papers, is author of several books, his work has been cited >6000 times, has been awarded Life Time achievement awards & is a fellow of many international societies, & is the editor of Journal of Food Engineering, best journal in food engineering. I am sure he deserves a wikipedia entry according to criteria 2, 3, 4, 5, 8.

Thanks for patrolling my page

Hello David, Thanks for patrolling my page. Patrolled to me means approved for creation the page for public. Am I right? If not can you help me to improve it based on your experience. ThanksAlireza.niakani (talk) 15:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alireza.niakani For User:Alireza.niakani/Rebis Academy of Technology, it unfortunately is not solidly acceptable yet as it needs in-depth third-party sources overall from places such as news, journals and magazines. also consider seeing schools notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my draft

I have thoroughly researched and checked and found that all NCache articles are completely different from the one I added. This NCache is a Distributed_cache for .NET applications. Thanks :)Jaimie_daz (talk) 00:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

James Bethel Gresham Review

Thanks for the review, I am fairly new to creating pages, but I noticed that Thomas Enright and Merle Hay were both copied verbatim from Find a Grave. I cleaned up Enright's page, but I haven't figured out what I want to do with Hay's. I am still trying to track down more information on his early life. If you could review both of those pages, that would help out a lot. Feickus (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brighton Festival Chorus

Hi David, Thanks for reviewing my draft submission. Regarding the notability of the subject, I've checked the Wikipedia:Notability (music) guidelines, and I think Brighton Festival Chorus meets the criteria for musicians and ensembles, specifically meeting the following criteria:

5. Has released two or more albums on a major record label
- As you'll see from the selected discography, BFC has released albums on many major labels
7. Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city
- I've added a reference to a newspaper article concerning BFC's place in the music scene of Brighton
8 Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award.
- Recordings featuring BFC has been nominated for 2 Grammy awards (references provided)

I hope this helps. I'll have a look to see if I can find any other relevant references, and then I'll resubmit. Thanks, Kevin Callagkm (talk) 13:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:08:00, 21 December 2015 review of submission by Alby27

Alby27 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ontario Games (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for the review!

Type of information about the Ontario Games is very similar to the Canada Games. To understand what is required is it just more information and links to things about the Ontario Games? The Games are in the process of transition, the rights holder of the Games - Sport Alliance Ontario went bankrupt in April - there are news articles about that can be referenced. Current rights holders - the Government of Ontario does not have information listed on their website about the Games so it is hard to reference it. Additionally, information about past Ontario Games can be difficult to find since websites usually shut down shortly after the Games complete.

If it is simply getting more references, I can do a complete search but want to know I am close.

Thanks for all the help!

Request on 19:59:40, 21 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by VicFury

VicFury (talk · contribs)
- Draft:US Coast Guard Counterintelligence Service (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I received a message that the subject could not be created because the topic was not notable even though it is a US government agency tasked with national security as part of the Intelligence Community (IC). I provided several references but I am confused as to what I need to complete this report. Any assistance is appreciated.

Also, I created a previous entry, the Massachusetts Probation Service (MPS) and I have some clipart that I wanted to add tot he page but don't know how to add photos?

Thank you.

VicFury (talk) 19:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

VicFury, the problem is not that it isn't notable, but, as the notice says, that it didn't have sufficient references to show notability. Yoou need to find and add references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements or anything published by the agency. DGG ( talk ) 19:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceann Hai

Be careful, someone wants to put words in your mouth: [13] [14] Timmyshin (talk) 23:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahaha

I noticed that Timmyshin and it's certainly not the first time. Aside from your ping and message, I always watch my voted AfDs so I would've likely seen it immediately as well. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 23:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could I double check the astronomy articles you've reviewed for anything you might've missed?

User:JHRock put the hoax template on an erroneous article that he created 6 minutes earlier and never came back. He also changed 2 correct letters in an infobox which changed it from okay to tens of billions of times too bright. He put KKR 25's (dimmer) blue magnitude in an infobox that doesn't accept absmag_b. I don't know what the heck he's doing. Both of those articles you reviewed had numerical errors you didn't notice so maybe there's more out there? Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 04:19, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sagittarian Milky Way I looked through all of his contributions quite fast as there aren't many to begin with but the current articles, whether entirely accurate or not, seem notable and acceptable. I found the article because of the tag and I've encountered a few other new astronomy articles but they all seem acceptable as well. Feel welcome to make any changes you feel are necessary. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 04:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They're fine now because I fixed them. Apparent magnitude -10 is about the brightness of the half moon so if a galaxy had that brightness it would cast shadows at night. If you saw any other recently born articles of galaxies over several hundred thousand light years wide or apparent magnitudes smaller than 10 (like -10) then those are likely fake. Absolute magnitudes however should be negative because those are how bright they'd look if every star were 10 parsecs away — far, far closer than any galaxy. If you didn't then I guess it might be okay now. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 04:56, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know User:Yimingguo and his socks User:JHRock, User:AndromedaTwister and User:SreewGalaxy were indefinitely blocked today. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 20:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The TEAK Fellowship

Hello! Thank you for reviewing my article. Your comment was: "Simply still not enough in-depth third-party sources overall." I have four newspaper sources, which are articles written expressly about the fellowship. They include New York Times and People. I'm sure tens of thousands of accepted Wikipedia articles don't have such strong sources. I appreciate your hard work and I know you are doing your best to be objective. But I can't help thinking an injustice has been made and I can't do anything about it any more. I have great sources. I can't provide any better. Please help. --Judtrap (talk) 11:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the main problem is now the tone--see my comment of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Pepper draft

I have to say, your reason for why you declined my submission at AfC was the one I was least expecting. I tried my best to cite as many sources as I can to prove that the subject was notable. Would you mind elaborating on why you don't think that draft meets WP:GNG? Your comment on the draft says that there's not much to suggest notability "aside from getting some expected coverage for controversies". What I would like to know is why the controversies have to be tossed aside when considering his notability. Those incidents are what he is most notable for, so is there a reason why those can't be taken into account? I'd love to hear your thoughts. Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 16:43, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:09:54, 22 December 2015 review of submission by Josh.Nickell

Josh.Nickell (talk · contribs)
- Draft:American Rental Association (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

00:53:06, 23 December 2015 review of submission by NicholasReedy

NicholasReedy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Xodus (magazine) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As requested, further citations and links to help cite the Notability requirements have now been added. Please check number 7, 22, and 23.

Also, you will note that the text has been also updated to include the comments published by ""Your Essential Guide to Queer Pop Culture" " which includes information on Xodus Magazine that should help fulfill another verification of the Notability for the Magazine.

Fort Worth, Texas magazine declined again

You declined my post at the below link saying that it doesn't meet the notability guidelines for a journal, but it's not a journal. It is a monthly magazine. Please advise. I have a lot of sources.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Fort_Worth,_Texas_magazine

Also, how are my sources any different than what is provided on a similar page. See here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_Magazine

Fwtxmag (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review of submission by Swelch12 - Reference Question

Hi - my submission was rejected due to references, however, I included reputable sources including NBC News, Forbes, Live Science and Campus Technology. Would it be possible to get some advice on what can be added to help get approval?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Artec_3D

Submission declined on 21 December 2015 by SwisterTwister

Hello, dear! I can't understand what now wrong with the citations. I provided sources on which i was based when writing the article. Also, i did it in the similar way as another software article close to QForm - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceClaim I really don't see the difference. Please, provide with the detailed answer. Thanks a lot! Wish you a merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mskpetrov (talk • contribs) 11:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DLA Piper

Just an FYI I left you a note over at Talk:DLA Piper. I look forward to your input. Thanks. NinaSpezz (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at some of your recent AfC acceptances

An example is Big Grrrl Small World where you used the AFCH script to accept it, but, somehow, it has not been cleaned properly and is thus in Category:Pending AfC submissions in article space.

I have seen this happen when the reviewer works faster than the software. It usually happens when we close the window/tab with the draft in it before the script has finished.

Would you mind double checking for your next few acceptances and also going back over some of your recent ones, please? Fiddle Faddle 17:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Moti Kahana

I did some work on Draft:Moti Kahana today. I was surprised that you had declined this article with "Although it seems he's gotten coverage for his activities, there's simply not enough in-depth third-party solid sources to suggest fully satisfying notability guidelines." There are 16 references in the article, almost all renominated American or Israeli newspapers, that establish his notable involvement in notable companies and events. Might I ask you to review the article once more? If you still find the article lacking, please give me some specific clues, as to what you feel the problem is. Debresser (talk) 18:53, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you have been around on Wikipedia, but have found the time to reply. I think that I'll take my chances with moving this draft to article mainspace in a few days. If so, please don't take it personal. Debresser (talk) 13:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:40:17, 24 December 2015 review of submission by Retengineer

Retengineer (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Anna Ciddor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you very much for your help improving the article. I have now included many more third party sources as you suggested and I can see how this has improved the article. I hope this article is now acceptable. Thank you again.Retengineer (talk) 06:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:25:45, 24 December 2015 review of submission by Zeitwerk

Zeitwerk (talk · contribs)
- Draft:EZA Watches (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your comments on the piece. It is my first time on wiki and I would like to get more information about small watch brands in wikipedia. What should I do and how could I improve the first article about Eza Watches? I tried to find extra sources, but this is all there is according to me. Thanks in advance. Warm regards.

Koloff article

I want to see what you think of Kolby Koloff?The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup needed.

The following pages appear to have been accepted by you from AFC and moved to mainspace, but somehow not finished, could you please check?

Naraht (talk) 13:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:59:13, 26 December 2015 review of submission by Olympiclin

Olympiclin (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Steven Jastrabek (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi. Olympiclin here. I am a hairdresser with links to the Olympic movement for the last 20 years. I have many newspaper and magazine articles that have been written on the subject. Any advice?Olympiclin (talk) 11:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Howard Barnes

Hi David,

Thankyou for your assistance with the Andrew Howard Barnes Page. Would be grateful if you would be able to direct me further. I now have 24 high quality third party (media) links and proof points and meta data which mainly illustrate the entrepreneur and philanthropy innovations, plus illustrating how he is innovating / redefining the old fashioned paper based "will creation" into digital to make wills make more accessible. regards

Please let me know where I should make alterations

PS. Now have 31 !

Dwayne

DwayneJAlexander (talk) 03:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lisa Goodrich

Heyo SwisterTwister and Merry Christmas :) I hope everything is well. The draft clearly meets #5 of WP:PROF which states: Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. Goodrich is a professor at Harvard Medical School and the sources (including the official Harvard website) confirm it. Even if any article contains only primary sources (which isn't the case here), there is no need of additional sources as long as facts like that are established and I would appreciate if you would reconsider. Happy holidays BTW :) Ya sh ! 06:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12:50:42, 27 December 2015 review of submission by EefeG0hi

EefeG0hi (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Voter Surveillance (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is a developing topic with few scientific references yet. Bennett's article has been well received: E.g. https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2015/11/voter_surveilla.html More information can be found in Schneier's book. https://www.schneier.com/books/data_and_goliath/ I could add that reference.

Bennett has at least two more papers on this topic specifically: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2605183 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2279920 I haven't read them, so, I'd prefer others to add these references later.

As for notability, there is already an article on voter databases. Voter surveillance takes this to a new level. Here are some press outlets reporting on the issue. I left these reference out to avoid controversy, as it directly relates to the upcoming elections in the US. Would you prefer me to put them in? Cruz: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cruz-campaign-credits-psychological-data-and-analytics-for-its-rising-success/2015/12/13/4cb0baf8-9dc5-11e5-bce4-708fe33e3288_story.html http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/428480/ted-cruzs-big-data-collection-can-it-really-help-him-win http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/11/senator-ted-cruz-president-campaign-facebook-user-data

Obama: https://www.propublica.org/article/is-your-neighbor-a-democrat-obama-has-an-app-for-that

13:14:40, 27 December 2015 review of submission by ReubenSandwichNYC

ReubenSandwichNYC (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Cynthia Mailman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm curious as to how many reference one needs for an artist's listing... Ms Mailman was involved in the Sister Chapel a significant women's art event of the 70's, as well as being a founder of SoHo20, both referenced here on Wiki.... Also had major work destroy in WTC attack, also referenced right here on Wiki.... You advice on how to improve this will be appreciated. RS

Kian Lawley

Unprotected now. I'm not an expert on the notability of YouTubers, but it shouldn't be a candidate for the speedy deletion that befell its predecessors, could be AfDed i suppose, but looks OK to me Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy (disambiguation)

You accepted this AfC despite it having been declined twice [15][16] and the IP editor tendentiously removing prior declined reviews four times [17][18][19][20] with no change in the article prior to doing so. Were you aware of this? Since you accepted the article, it has been tagged for AfD, which of course the IP editor is edit warring to remove [21]. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

S. Srikanta Sastri

It looks like you approved this article at AfC but perhaps didn't remove the main template from the article? (Not sure if you wanted to tag the talk page or notify the submitter either) czar 16:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed article on Yehuda Atai

Hi David, Following your decline and suggestions of the draft for the proposed page 'Yehuda Atai', we have added links to further evidence the reception of Dr. Atai's books in the Israeli media, and for some of the participants in the recent symposium on his philosophical writing, who are themselves well established in Israel's cultural and intellectual life. We have also added more references about the reception and discussion of his political work. There are quite a lot of links to Dr. Atai's appearances on radio and TV relating to his poetry and to his activism. I hope the improvements are sufficient for you to accept it: I am resubmitting it. Many thanks and happy new year. Very best, (Mark Joseph (talk) 18:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Request on 19:35:33, 27 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by BChezzHuman

BChezzHuman (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Daniel N. Baker (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you clarify notability requirements for Draft:Daniel_N._Baker?

Per the cited official source, he holds the Distinguished Professor title at University of Colorado Boulder, and therefore should qualify under WP:PROF, unless Wikipedia don't consider UCB to be a "major university". Is the latter the issue? UCB is in the top-50 in the respected Shanghai Index of universities internationally, and also in the Wikipedia list of US research institutions. Did UCB not make the "major university" cut, or was there another issue? If UCB is considered not a "major university" despite its Shanghai Index ranking, can WP provide guidance on where the cut-off it, approximately?

If WP doesn't accept that he hold Distinguished Prof title at major research university, then he should qualify based on his h-index. He has a lot of Google scholar publications, but hasn't set up a profile. Google scholar searches should not be cited (probably because Google doesn't allow archiving). There are non-profiles on ResearchGate that could be used to establish his h-index & citation count. Judging from the number of citations on Wikipedia alone, it will be very high. Will adding a citation to one of these sources be helpful, or is it a separate issue?

BChezzHuman (talk) 19:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Random AfD question...

Hello! I've got a random question for you – do you have any idea why this isn't showing up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Television, etc.? I'm trying to figure out if I'm doing something wrong with my use of the {{Delsort}} template... Thanks in advance! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So, do listings have to be done manually then? – using {{Delsort}} doesn't list it for you automatically? (TIA...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IJBall Often it will be listed (automatically, that is, I myself always list it automatically) but at times and I suspect when it never went through completely, it may not be listed. I've also been noticing a few more timing troubles here at WP recently (particularly at AfC). Cheers,

SwisterTwister talk

03:07:19, 28 December 2015 review of submission by Gast2011

Gast2011 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Stefan Gandler (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister: I included several in-depth third-party sources and made, in general, the text more precise. If you have any other question, please ask me. Gast2011 (talk) 03:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your AFC Accept process

Hi SwisterTwister, I've noticed quite a few new article acceptances by you, using the AFCH script, have been incomplete. The Accept routine of the script seems to fail - it doesn't add WikiProject banners to the Talk page and it doesn't clean up the AFC templates and related bits and pieces from the article page itself nor does it add any article categories. Here are a couple of examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dimini%C4%87i&oldid=696958645 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_NWA_Smoky_Mountain_Wrestling_alumni&oldid=696399468 - The result is that some (all?) of your "Accepts" are ending up in Category:Pending AfC submissions in article space where I find them and then try to clean them up. Are you definitely using the current version of the script? Does it never give you an error message when accepting a submission? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Dodger67: several of us have tried to draw ST's attention to this. My hypothesis is that they run too fast, not allowing the process to complete before closing the tab with the script running in it. I have seen this happen before when a reviewer is working very quickly and becomes impatient to get to the next draft. The script declares its own version and they seem to be using the current version. Fiddle Faddle 12:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Dodger67:, @Timtrent: yup. Put me in that list of people as well.Naraht (talk) 17:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dodger67 Timtrent I never get any "error" message and everything seems to work aside from that. I've also noticed the reviewing bar will not work with some and I have to wait until later or if someone else reviews that particular draft. I've noticed it definitely seems I'm not the only one experiencing this. SwisterTwister talk 18:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed you are not the only one. You simply seem to suffer it most often. There are no error messages shown when this happens. This is why I am suggesting that you may close the window or tab in which you are reviewing too quickly. It appears that the helper script requires the tab to be open for the entirety of the processing it needs to perform, or the processing is truncated.

If you notice a repeatable issue with the script it would be a kindness to report it on the relevant discussion page, though. Such issues are 'not working' Fiddle Faddle 18:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Franziskus Hennemann

New Notes William Eric Brown, Philippe Denis, Mark James. It's ok? --91.16.146.83 (talk) 16:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03:05:58, 29 December 2015 review of submission by DwayneJAlexander

DwayneJAlexander (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Andrew Howard Barnes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Happy Holidays SwisterTwister, Thanks for the pointer. I have now upgraded the independent references significantly . Please let me know if its moved in teh right direction.

All the best DwayneJAlexander (talk) 03:05, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04:46:16, 29 December 2015 review of submission by Rachita188

Rachita188 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Spykar Lifestyle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

RE: Roswell Artist-in-Residence Program I am unconvinced by your determination that our residency is not "notable". I listed 38 references to our program in my recent submission and they all appear to reliable. The Santa Fe New Mexican, The Albuquerque Journal, Art in America are all long established publications of very credible reputations. There is a book published regarding our history listed in the Library of Congress. Any Artist-in-Residence Program that has been offering all-expense paid, one-year residencies for fifty years is, by definition "notable". How many times does a subject need to be referenced in Wikipedia before there needs to be a page on that subject? Because we are referenced in Wikipedia many times. Does it have something to do with our program only serving visual artists? I noticed that other residencies who support writers get far more attention from your editors. Could it be that editors lean towards words rather than images? Also, what do we make of entries like: Surel’s Place, Ucross, or Village of the Arts? Anyone in the visual arts would hardly consider these as more notable than the Roswell Artist-in-Residence Program. Ask any authority within the Visual Arts if you need convincing. Another odd example is Djerassi. A fine residency yes, but this is the only "reference" for their entry: "Kendzulak, Susan. "Fine Art: The Djerassi Artists Residency". About.com". Come on, About.com? One web reference and that's it? Yet we list many references and you insist that we are not "notable" enough. Is it that you don't believe that our area of the southwest and its publications are credible? Perhaps you need to pass me on to someone with a background in the "visual arts". Also, I noticed there is something called WikiProjects United States and that New Mexico is one of those states. Are we more notable in that context? I notice that you have a nice entry for the Roswell Museum and Art Center which is our original parent institution. Their list of references actually uses our website as a reference for their notability! (see #3)If we are not notable, how can they use us as a reference for their notability? "^ "Roswell Museum and Art Center". Currents New Media. Retrieved February 20, 2015. 2.Jump up ^ "Roswell Astronomy Club". Roswellastronomyclub.com. Retrieved February 20, 2015. 3.Jump up ^ "Roswell Artist-in-Residence Program Home Page rair.org. Roswell Artists-in-Residence Foundation. Retrieved February 20, 2015. 4.Jump up ^ Bragg, Terry A. "Register to the papers of Robert H. & Esther C. Goddard". Gordonlibrary.wpi.edu. WPI Gordon Library. Retrieved February 20, 2015. 5.Jump up ^ Ebie, Teresa H. "Remarkable Women of Taos New Mexico: Barbara Latham". Taos.org. Retrieved February 21, 2015."

And, I can't help pointing out, that their references are, by your standards, remarkably thin. I mean, the Roswellastronomyclub.com ? Really? Also the article references the Roswell Artist-in-Residence Program by name: "In 1967, the Roswell Artist-in-Residence program was established through the support of local artist and philanthropist Donald B. Anderson. The first Artist-in-Residence was American painter and Taos resident, Howard Cook" But there is no link to us because you say we are not notable. Rather than take up more of your time with other examples, of which there are many, I'm asking that you reconsider you decision to reject our page. Swalworthfleming (talk) 22:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Swalworthfleming (talk) 22:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)"[reply]

I think I understand. Do you mean reliable sources? I've gone back and done some more research and added in several additional sources. These include The Times and City A.M., as well as some regional and local newspapers. There are now 18 sources listed, which include national newspapers (Express, Telegraph, The Times, This Is Money/Daily Mail), Local/regional newspapers (Bournemouth Echo, Bucks Free Press, City A.M., Oxford Times, Salisbury Journal, Wetherby News), Local government (Adur & Worthing Council, Winchester Council), and Industry publications (Best Companies, Construction News, Estate Agent Today, Gazette Series, Housebuilder & Developer, and Seniors Housing). I have omitted additional sources like other local and regional publications because I feel that would just be duplicating the ones already listed, but they are available, if needs be. Perhaps you can give your thoughts when possible. Thank you Fbell74 (talk) 03:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you're quite busy with queries at the moment, so I'll just resubmit the revised article and see how it goes. However, if you get an opportunity, please do respond in any case. Thanks 112.205.196.224 (talk) 02:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply on the article page. I've responded there, but for clarity am including the response here as well -

"I could include more information on their property developments in various locations. Do you think that would speak to notability? I could try and put together a breakdown of their geographical spread in the UK as well. Would that help?" Fbell74 (talk) 04:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment on the article page. I agree with you that including additional sources that relate to the company's developments may not add to the article, as there are several of these already included. The company is mentioned in articles in such newspapers as the Times, Express, Telegraph and Guardian, and I've included these in the article already. So, source material isn't an issue, I would think. The company lies just outside the Top 250 privately held companies in the UK (about £8M less in turnover than the 250th, which has £147.7M in turnover [I can provide a source for this]). It's also been ranked as one of the top 50 small companies to work for in the UK by the Sunday Times. Would that not be sufficient in terms of notability? Fbell74 (talk) 07:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I noticed that a competitor (McCarthy & Stone) has had an article published. While the latter is a bigger organisation the two can be considered rivals and the other article also has far fewer sources and those that are included are from a much narrower range than the Churchill Retirement Living article. With this in mind, do you think the article merits approval? Thank you Fbell74 (talk) 06:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, and a tiny inquiry

Hello, sir.

First of all I'd like to thank you for patrolling my page Huzama Habayeb; I highly appreciate it.

I have an inquiry, too; and I hope you'll be able to help me out. After I had created the page in English, I joined the Arabic part of Wikipedia to create an Arabic counterpart of the English page. I saw a translation tool that would allow me to directly create the page, add the references, media, and every other component in the page automatically; and I simply needed to just translate the text. I started doing that, but I when I was finished and published the article, I found out that every time I needed to edit something it would have to be reviewed by someone to be published although the page is mine. I didn't face this problem while I was creating the English page. And now, there are numerous edits and tonnes of additions that I've already made in the Arabic page but they need to be reviewed. Unfortunately, however, the guys at the Arabic version of Wikipedia are not that active.

What I want to kindly ask you is: first, would it be possible for you to approve my edits or does it have to be someone from the Arabic Wikipedia staff? and second, why is this happening in the first place? It's me who created the page; I should be able to edit however I like and the changes should be instantaneous—and that was the case while I was creating the English page—and then eventually, some editor would go through the whole thing and patrol the page, right?

Thanks in advance, sir.

Abdallah a.k.a Angevilish (talk) 07:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an active member of Arabic Wiki nor am I an Arabic speaker so it would have to be one of the users there, yes. Cheers,

SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Creation Ramanananda Maharshi

Hi SwisterTwister, I have made fews edits in the article and added hindu news, metro india news, regional(Telugu) newspaper citations and other websites of World records as a resource for subjects notability. Please verify and publish the article

Thanks a Lot for your suggestion

I've already read your comment and added news citations to article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vcky92 (talk • contribs) 08:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Vcky92 (talk) 07:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07:32:28, 9 November 2015 review of submission by Venkateshburli

Venkateshburli (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Geophysical signal analysis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would firstly like to thank you for reviewing my submission. If you would please elaborate on the "article being more like a report" part, it would greatly help in editing my submission.

Also, since it is my first time article writing experience kindly suggest me the changes which will help in my submission being accepted.

Venkateshburli (talk) 07:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly Venkateshburli, the article looks more like something you would see in an academic journal rather than a formal encyclopedia article (honest, simply look at any other related subject). Feel welcome to continue to learn how editing works and please ask if you need any further help. SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:46:37, 9 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Venkateshburli

Venkateshburli (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Geophysical signal analysis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As this article had not been written previously, I wanted to introduce the concepts involved in geophysical signal processing. I would be grateful to you if suggest me improvements. Also, Can an analysis of a topic be on Wikipedia? If not, kindly help me in making this submission more like an article.

Thanks.

Venkateshburli (talk) 07:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like an interesting subject but it may need a better lead with better information for viewers unfamiliar with the subject. Consider seeing WP:Writing better articles and WP:Your first article. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:51:34, 9 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Sujith Aradhya

Sujith Aradhya (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Akhil rabindra (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Sujith Aradhya (talk) 07:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the content of Akhil Rabindra who is a sports person.

08:15:37, 9 November 2015 review of submission by Sujith Aradhya

Sujith Aradhya (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Akhil rabindra (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Sujith Aradhya (talk) 08:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)The Sports person must "Have been enshrined in any notable motorsports hall of fame." this is achieved by Akhil Rabindra as he has been the winner for the FIA Young Drivers Excellence Academy 2014. Akhil Rabindra with this achievement has been enshrined in a notable motorsports hall of fame at the FIA Academy.Sujith Aradhya (talk) 08:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gauss Lectures, resubmitting

Thank you for your comments on the Draft:Gauss Lectureship. As discussed, I added third-party sources for the last lectures (all lectures from 2015), using a mainstream newspaper, a more specialized (but general-public) news portal and the news services of two universities. At this point this draft has more references than the original (German) page https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gau%C3%9F-Vorlesung and also than the Portuguese version. Initially I planned only to translate! Thanks for your reviewing work. 178.197.235.140 (talk) 12:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bridges Ventures LLP

Hi Swister Twister,

Thanks for your message. Am working on it, will hopefully be able to get a redraft with you soon.

thanks! Aung2015

88.98.34.53 (talk) 12:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Medieval Women Mysticism

A tag has been placed on Medieval Women Mysticism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Speech Production

A tag has been placed on Speech Production requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:19:34, 9 November 2015 review of submission by Finfwaz

Finfwaz (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Pivotal Corporation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister - Can you provide examples of what you consider good coverage, or what you want to know about this company in order for the draft to be accepted? Thanks for the advice.

17:20:07, 9 November 2015 review of submission by Finfwaz

Finfwaz (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Pivotal Corporation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister - Can you provide examples of what you consider good coverage, or what you want to know about this company in order for the draft to be accepted? Thanks for the advice. Finfwaz (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Discovery and Development of Selective progesterone receptor modulators has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Discovery and Development of Selective progesterone receptor modulators. Thanks! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 03:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
Mouth full of sweets,
Home full of lamps,
And festival full of sweet memories...

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

St Michael's Rowing Club

I see you declined Draft:St Michael's Rowing Club a few days ago. I could only see on reliable third party source that seemed to indicate any true notability. In fact I think it fails WP:CLUB as many of the source only mention it in passing or are about individuals associated with it. Just my 2c worth. ww2censor (talk) 10:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had a thought

Like you, I see clear reasons for AFC acceptance or pushing material back, or even deleting it. Like you I am decisive. I'm not sure that makes me any good, of course, but that's for others to judge

The thought is that I believe you can be even more useful for the editors whose work you review, and without huge effort, perhaps with less effort.

Over the time I've been reviewing I have found I get the fewest questions about my reviews when I give detailed comments. The comments I use change for time to time. I use them as a selection of comments that I modify to suit the occasion and combine in many and mysterious ways. If they are any help to you please feel free to dip in. User:Timtrent/Reviewing contains the list. Fiddle Faddle 12:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:47:28, 10 November 2015 review of submission by Nyc229

Nyc229 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:PubMatic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to understand how I can provide more pieces of third party coverage in order to meet the Companies guidelines. Will the following pieces of coverage suffice?

http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20130918/TECHNOLOGY/130919875/pubmatic-to-move-add-20-employees http://www.beet.tv/2014/05/pubmatic-2.html http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/226139/pubmatic-puts-mobile-in-motion-acquires-ad-server.html http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/252582/pubmatic-partners-with-integral-to-roll-out-brand.html

Yannis Tseklenis draft

I have resubmitted this, after adding the references you suggested. What do you think? (Akouzi (talk) 16:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)) Akouzi (talk) 16:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:33:21, 10 November 2015 review of submission by Lisagranado

Lisagranado (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Gulf Coast Western (2) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing the page. I am wondering what I need to add? The oil and gas exploration industry has many different players and in order to understand the full picture it is important to be aware of the small players too--especially now while oil prices are low many small companies that are well leveraged are able to buy development acreage/wells that were disproportionately priced previously. That makes many small companies key players in the oil and gas industry, as well as key players in America's economy since they are providing investment opportunities and providing extra tax income to states. Also, in comparison to some other Wikipedia oil and gas company pages such as Vaalco Energy, the Gulf Coast Western page has many more references as well as links to other educational Wiki pages--proving it's activities and importance. Lisagranado (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:41:20, 10 November 2015 review of submission by Venkateshburli

Venkateshburli (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Geophysical signal analysis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Your suggestions were very valuable in my editing. I have made changes to the lead section.Kindly re-review the article.

Venkateshburli (talk) 22:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

00:23:57, 11 November 2015 review of submission by DrIsaiahRoy

DrIsaiahRoy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:International Society for Mountain Medicine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there. I'm not sure I understand the reason the article was declined. You wrote: "This still needs any more available coverage overall" Perhaps you could elaborate as I find the message of your suggestion is quite unclear to me (to the point of being nonsensical :S)

I appreciate your clarification. IR

Request on 01:27:55, 11 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mxx boss

Mxx boss (talk · contribs)
- Draft:FireFLY (LifeIsGood) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister,
Thanks for your review on the page "FireFLY (LifeIsGood)".
I have made several modifications to the page, I hope they gonna match your request.
The pictures are also on permission request to OTRS.
Let me know if I can improve the article in any way.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Best regards !
Mxx boss (talk) 01:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03:54:09, 11 November 2015 review of submission by Tom jowett

Tom jowett (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Reach Out Volunteers Charity (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for the review, I appreciate your feedback. I am in the process of updating the page. Just to confirm, where you have inserted "arrows" is that where you would like specific references.

Thank you again,

Request on 04:19:56, 11 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by LW1588

LW1588 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kirk Ke Wang (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for the review. I read the "Notability" guideline and thought that my article meets the criteria, including a national art competition winner (bronze medal out of 1.2 billion place), substantial coverage (newspapers, magazine, WEDU-Arts Plus, a PBS series, museum art shows, etc.) and a creative professional.

Please clarify third party sources. Your help is greatly appreciated!LW1588 (talk) 04:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LW1588 (talk) 04:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 04:38:57, 11 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Cluetrekk

Cluetrekk (talk · contribs)
- Draft:New Swears (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for the review SwisterTwister, I had tried to submit a page on the New Swears and it was rejected twice for the same reasoning despite ensuring that the criteria were met. Effort was made to capture the bands notability i.e. 2 albums on independent lables, independent reviews, performed in world renowned events, international concerts, etc. I tried to make every single statement verifiable by at least one entirely independent reference so that all references were verifiable and support the bands notability..

Can you please clarify where the page needs improvement. Thank you very much, Mark

Cluetrekk (talk) 04:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mika Toba notability

Hi, you turned down the Draft:Mika Toba with the following reason: "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia."

But... there's 5 references, including 3 articles specifically about her and her art in Japanese national dailies, plus the VietNamNet source (which isn't a source I'm familiar with) and the magazine in-depth interview. I don't see what more you could ask of when the notability article plainly states "they [should]have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." 126.59.94.42 (talk) 06:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

126.59.94.42 Yes but the current amount of sourcing is simply not enough to fully confirm it as an article and ensuring safety from deletion attempts by others who may question its notability. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 06:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:35:56, 11 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by ThalionSES

ThalionSES (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Verigreen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

We released Verigreen to promote the usage of gated check-in (commit) concept in the development industry. I'm struggling with which additional verifiable citations you require - I've added citations from Microsoft, JetBrains and Jenkins CI (CloudBees), all concerning the gated check-in concept. We're a tool promoting this way of developing code. How is that different from any other 3rd party tool (especially open-source ones) that are on Wikipedia? How is that different from Git, Jenkins, Docker or any other such tool already present in Wikipedia? I feel this is kind of a chicken and an egg - to raise awareness we need more sources. To get more sources, we need to raise awareness. I think Wikipedia is a good platform to raise the awareness and even a discussion (by editing) of the concepts.

I would really appreciate some pointers into which kind of citations would be acceptable.

Thanks in advance!

ThalionSES (talk) 06:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand ThalionSES but for the article to be fully confirmable as an article and safe from any deletion attempts questioning notability, the sourcing needs to be more adequate (six (6) is acceptable sometimes but in this case, it may need some more). Cheers,

SwisterTwister talk 06:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:50:14, 11 November 2015 review of submission by Sjscott80

Sjscott80 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Logz.io (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! I just wanted to say thank you for taking the time to review my draft of Logz.io. I'm sure you get a lot of angry messages from people asking, "Why was my draft rejected?!" -- this is definitely not one of them. :)

I was just curious because I looked at the Wikipedia page of Loggly, another company in the industry, and the length of the content and the number and quality of the sources were similar. So, is there another way that I could improve the article?

Thanks in advance for any guidance!

Quick question

I see you review a lot of the articles I create so thought I would check with you first for some advice. I was reviewing an article and thought it to be a content fork so I looked further. I discovered the article was created by an editor who also created two other articles that could also possibly be considered content forks as there is already an article they could be included in. Once thing that is common to all three articles is there is a link to the same website in all three. The website is a local business that is no where near a reliable source. Is it common for people to create articles simply to try to gain a backlink from Wikipedia or it more common that people go to articles already created to add a link? --CNMall41 (talk) 10:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Simply curious, what article is it CNMall41? SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thought it best to email. First, I don't want to make the user feel like they are being watched, if in fact they are good faith edits. Second, I don't trust editors who will read it here and destroy the articles just because of my "suspicion." --CNMall41 (talk) 17:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, SwisterTwister. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

11:22:55, 11 November 2015 review of submission by ThalionSES

ThalionSES (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Verigreen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

I've upped the references to twelve (12). Are those enough to make the re-review work and accepted?

Much appreciated,

ThalionSES (talk) 11:22, 11 November 2015 (UTC)ThalionSES[reply]

Thanks ThalionSES, however, I'm still concerned with its current how-to guide tone. Is there someway to change it to a more encyclopedia nature? Adding any more information about it aside from how to use would be welcome. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really struggling here. I've watched how Chef (software) or Puppet (software) pages are formatted (for example) and they look the same. I don't think I put a single 'how-to' reference in the article - this is not its intent. I'm merely explaining what it does, not how-to (that's what the external website is for). Would really appreciate specific pointers I can work with. Thanks! ThalionSES (talk) 09:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12:26:33, 11 November 2015 review of submission by Nmacs77

Nmacs77 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ronnie Woo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Thank you for the reply. There are other sources for this individual, such as some print magazine articles and mentions, but not sure how to site those sources. Also, could you be more specific about what kind of general "available coverage overall" you mean? I think I'm confused on what else needs to be included in order for this article to accepted. If you could tell me what other articles need to be included I could search for those specifically. Thank you for your help. :)

Nmacs77, you can list offline sources exactly like the others if the same information (titles, dates, etc.) are available. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:09:13, 11 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Eleda249

Eleda249 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sedona Canada Principles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This submission is not on the organization Sedona Conference. or the working group sedona canada 7. it is on the principles that are being introduced into the canadian legal system and referred to repeatedly in legal resources. Please reconsider. This is for a class project due 12.11.2015 Eleda249 (talk) 13:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)eleda249[reply]

Eleda249 (talk) 13:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eleda249, the article looks good but still needs any more available sources for weight and depth. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vital Danza rejection

Hi David,

I am very new to wikipedia and I would like to know why my article doesn't reach the general guidelines of notability. I was wondering how I could use my sources better as well. I don't have many sources in english, my subject has been covered more in finland, Japan and spain. I have a reference from a news programme in the Canary islands as well. Can I use citations from there? or do they have to be printed sources? Anyway, I just need some general advice for my article as there is so much information to swallow on the website. I feel a bit lost. I would really love for my first article to be on the wikipedia. Thank you so much for your help.

Marie.Michele.Tessier (talk) 13:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marie.Michele.Tessier, you can list non-English sources exactly like the English ones. The article simply needs any more available sources overall. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

How many more would I need? I've added one more. What would be a respectable amount of articles for it to fit the guidelines? I see other wikipedia articles with no more articles than mine. I'm sorry for having so many questions. Thanks so much for your help it is very appreciated!Marie.Michele.Tessier (talk) 15:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:46:55, 11 November 2015 review of submission by Mlnielson91

Mlnielson91 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Uptake (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I added additional references from article published in the Harvard Business Review, Chicago Tribune, Dow Jones Venturewire and Built in Chicago. I also added an award won by the company and references the award's winner's announcement.

The article looks good Mlnielson91 but I'm simply not convinced it meets companies notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:39:26, 11 November 2015 review of submission by LoveLarry1234

LoveLarry1234 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Christopher Bevans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not requesting a re-review, just need some direction :)

HI Swister Twister!

Thanks for helping. I included many citations, what else should I include? Are you saying I should cite more articles that directly correlate to Christopher Bevans and his work? Thanks!

Yes LoveLarry1234. SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:41:38, 11 November 2015 review of submission by RRamakr6

RRamakr6 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Wavelets for multidimensional signal analysis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I was asked as to why a separate article is necessary when there are pages on multidimensional signal processing and wavelets. I have a couple of things to say in this regard: From wikipedia, there are also different pages on all different types of wavelet transforms (CWT, DWT). I wanted to put them all together for the multidimensional case because they are more closely related and one is necessary to explain another. Also, there is the new technique of Hypercomplex wavelet transform for multidimensional signals. Research is still active in that field and there is not a lot I could write about it in the encyclopedic format in a totally other article.

I could also provide more sources for this but I do strongly believe that a new article is necessary.

Thank you for feedback regarding page for DBMaestro

i have added additional independent sources for coverage and further explained why what the company does is notable Nerminsaleemi (talk) 19:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm LaMona. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Classroom Assessment Techniques, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. LaMona (talk) 01:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 02:58:46, 12 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by LW1588

LW1588 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kirk Ke Wang (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Read your second comment. Will work on the references. Thank you for the help.LW1588 (talk) 02:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LW1588 (talk) 02:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussions at WP:NCOMPANY

Since I've noticed you are quite active in deletion discussions, including about companies, you may want to review some proposed changes at the talk of WP:NCOMPANY. More input is always welcome. Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

05:56:51, 12 November 2015 review of submission by 206.16.17.150

206.16.17.150 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:MuchTV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Could you help me finish this. How can I make it proper? 206.16.17.150 (talk) 05:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:20:06, 12 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Chirayu81

Chirayu81 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Daniel Fernandes (Comedian) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The person about whom the article is about is famous. I have cited various news paper articles about his work. He has done various shows for reputed companies and international festivals. I am unable to understand why is he not notifiable enough? Please help. Also this page was initially created and was up without any issues. But just because another user whose account was later blocked was associated with this page, this page was deleted. The second time i uploaded it, the reasons stated were that there were no references, now that there are references, the person is not notifiable enough.

Please help.

Chirayu81 (talk) 07:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12:45:42, 12 November 2015 review of submission by Marie.Michele.Tessier

Marie.Michele.Tessier (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Vital Danza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi!

I<ve added a direct citation from a magazine. These sources are the only ones I have, do you reckon it's not enough or would it be enough for me to just add some citations from the articles I have? Thanks for the help. Cheers.

Marie.Michele.Tessier (talk) 12:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:14:43, 12 November 2015 review of submission by VirginiaWagner

VirginiaWagner (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Andrew Ondrejcak (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, it's my first time editing and creating a page on Wikipedia and in response to the reasons for my page's decline I'm requesting help with wiki URLs: "note Wikipedia links are not used as references in themselves (instead, please use links about that with [[ ]] with the text in between those brackets, i.e. Arts)."

Currently I have this: ^[1]

Is it suppose to be this? ^[2]

or this? ^[3]

References

^ "Inigo Jones". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ [Inigo_Jones "Inigo Jones"]. {{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ {{Cite Inigo_Jones }}

19:49:32, 12 November 2015 review of submission by Tho2009

Tho2009 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Electric Jukebox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi David, Thanks for your feedback - I've now significantly and expanded the article and included references/citations to the Electric Jukebox articles in line with your last request. Let me know if this is now good to go.

Many thanks, Tim. Tho2009 (talk) 19:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Electric Jukebox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Electric Jukebox. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 20:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User:Revhall/sandbox

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Revhall/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 only applies to articles. G11 does not apply to userspace pages which have been blanked by the user. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Global Change Information System

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Global Change Information System, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:45:36, 13 November 2015 review of submission by MountainPleasure

MountainPleasure (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mountain Pleasure Horse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you tell me specifically which references you are referring to? There are no other references other than the ones I have used. Is it just that I need to list or name them differently?

01:51:44, 13 November 2015 review of submission by MountainPleasure

MountainPleasure (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mountain Pleasure Horse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

First, I would like to thank you for reviewing my entry. I am confused about what I need to do to correctly reference this article. I have included all available references so adding additional references is not an option. Is this just a matter of naming the references differently? Is it an issue of formatting? I have referenced the Mountain Pleasure Horse Association website several times. Should I instead repeat the same reference so that my current references 1-3 all be cited as reference 1? MountainPleasure (talk) 01:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 02:27:51, 13 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Whitenoise7633

Whitenoise7633 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Brainstems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The Brainstems band wiki I created was denied. How can I improve this article for submission? Is there a specific number of relevant news posts/press it would need?

Thanks. Whitenoise7633 (talk) 02:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aishwarya Trust Article

Hi SwisterTwister,

I have added all the references I had from the media coverage that Aishwarya Trust has received over the years. If you look at them, they are articles from reputed news outlets in India (The Times of India, The Hindu, Deccan Herald, Deccan Chronicle, Indian Express etc.) which back up the facts stated in the article. Could you please clarify exactly what you are looking for?

Vinod.chandrasekaran (talk) 03:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07:15:39, 13 November 2015 review of submission by Jimv391

Jimv391 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:FlightSite (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister. Could you tell me how many references I need for the article to be accepted? Which parts of the article lack references? Are there references that I am currently using that is not regarded as a good reference? Thanks.

Jimv391 Simply add any more available ones there are overall. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 08:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:26:11, 13 November 2015 review of submission by Webreaper

Webreaper (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Corran Purdon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, I've added a number of links to articles on Maj Gen Purdon, including BBC articles, the Times, and BBC Radio Ulster interviews. Maj Gen Purdon has a very long and notable life story, but I'm not a military historian - my intention is to get the basic page up and running and then engage with military historians to get the other details of his exploits documented. Is that a reasonable approach?

This is my first Wikipedia page, so if you have any other suggestions I'd gratefully accept them.

09:04:17, 13 November 2015 review of submission by 89.197.37.38

89.197.37.38 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Carspring (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

I was just wondering if there are any specific parts of the article that are in need of third party referencing.

Alternatively, could I just take certain sections out?

Request on 09:35:47, 13 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Sjscott80

Sjscott80 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Logz.io (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! At your request, I have added more authoritative third-party sources to Logz.io and will resubmit the article now. Thanks for the help!

Sjscott80 (talk) 09:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gill Fielding - Notability

Thank you for your attention to my proposed article for Gill Fielding. I have taken into consideration your comments and added a further two independent sources. One is from the Telegraph, featuring a preview of the television programme for which Gill is mainly known. I hope that, together with the existing Times and BBC references that this will be enough to establish notability. I have also added an additional reference from a local newspaper (The Worthing Herald). I hope that the fact that she is respected by that local news outlet as an expert in the field will add weight to my case for Gill's notability. I will resubmit shortly. If you feel this is still not enough, please would you give me some advice. If it is purely a case of numbers I'm sure I can trawl for a few more sources but if it's something else please let me know and I will address it. Thanks again. Neilho (talk) 12:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13:16:34, 13 November 2015 review of submission by 79.126.177.41

79.126.177.41 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Yane Sandanski and the Macedonian nationalism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Well, the article is sourced about every detail, and the sources are reliable, I believe. There are both primary and secondary, academic sources. Now, there are references in Macedonian, Greek and Bulgarian, but I believe that’s not the problem, is it? Because there are a few in English too, and links are provided. Can you tell me concretely what’s the problem? 79.126.177.41 (talk) 13:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC Barnstar

		The Articles for Creation barnstar
		For your tireless efforts at AfC. While we may not always see eye to eye, your work is noticed and appreciated. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Ya sh ! 15:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Accessible India Campaign submission

As you pointed out, I have added more information in the article that is relevant too. Please look into that and let me know if any new additions are required or the article is acceptable now? _Thanks. hey_pal (Friend.hey)^(talk) 14:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:54:28, 13 November 2015 review of submission by Hjohns89

Hjohns89 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Yvonne Healy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello there! I am hoping to get a better idea of what I'd need to do to provide enough sources for the page for Yvonne Healy I've been working on. My instinct is not to overwhelm the entry with a number of redundant articles, but I certainly can cite more articles that back up the information. (It is my first time working on Wikipedia so I appreciate all help/time/criticism very much)

Also, as a point of curiosity, this wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Rocha is the one that I started out using as a sample, given the shared profession, so I just wonder how that article passed but mine doesn't.

Thanks again! Hjohns89 (talk) 16:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Hjohns89[reply]

Concerning the submition of Max L. Lacayo page

I believe Max L. Lacayo is a notable writer because he has been featured in Newspaper article in the most prestigious Nicaraguan newspaper La Prensa. His books have been presented at the Nicaraguan Institute of Hispanic Culture Organization sponsored by the government of Spain. A video of that presentation was uploaded to youtube by a former president of Nicaragua Enrique Bolanos as you can see in reference number 7. The international journalist and writer María Lourdes Pallais has reviewed his book in La Prensa as you can see in reference number 8. In other references you can see article written about Max L. Lacayo and his work.

I appreciate you assistance.

Crystalnatalie Crystalnatalie (talk • contribs) 01:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Emile Rey

Hi David. Thanks for your efforts in reviewing articles, and for your feedback on my latest contribution via WP:AfC. As you'll have seen on the talk page, Emile Rey already has articles on Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and Spanish Wikipedia, albeit less well cited than this one. Following your concerns, I decided to delete those first ascents where I had myself added {{cn}} tags. With these temporarily removed, I suggest the article now better shows the WP:N of this person, and requires no further citations to support this. With a statue erected to his mountaineering achievements, and a major geographic feature in the Alps named after him, and with major first ascents of virgin alpine summits, he is far more significant than many lesser modern mountaineers who have articles based on just one or two new climbing routes. A search on his name within Wikipedia is itself quite revealing. I think the secondary sources I have cited do already demonstrate his wider recognition. The talk page also lists the further contributions I plan to make once this article goes into mainspace. I'd appreciate your further thoughts on this. Regards Parkywiki (talk) 01:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha looks like we tried patrolling at the same time

Right as I added a orphan tag to a page that was unpatrolled it said it was patrolled by you lol-just found that amusing! Wgolf (talk) 03:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfD rationales

Hi there,

In closing a bunch of backlogged AfDs, I've noticed that your "delete" rationales are usually something along the lines of "I don't see anything better". I'm not entirely sure what that means. I haven't encountered any discussions where one vote would have made the difference, but I think it might help the closing admins if you were to elaborate on your thoughts just a bit. Many thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Laursen

I have made suggested changes to the page for John Laursen (Sports), including more 3rd party references as suggested. Just wanted to touch base and see what else is needed in order to get my page published as you said in the last note that it "lmost satisfy sportspeople guidelines."

Thanks for the ongoing help getting everything in order! Draft:John_Laursen

Spider19880128 (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

G2s on sandboxes

Heya, I noticed you tagged a few sandbox drafts as G2/tests. The sandbox is a place for making tests, so my advice in those situations would be to either decline the submission as a test or simply remove the submit tags. There's not much point in deleting it, and may be overly BITEy to some folks, causing them to not come back for fear of having their pages deleted. Cheers, Primefac (talk) 07:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haha I suppose Primefac but I've also seen some of these which were basicaly vandalism such as Draft:Lucas Fields, only containing that he was the awesomest ever. One way or another, these may be single purpose accounts and there's nothing much to suggest keeping that (aside from simple testing I suppose). Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 07:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:46:51, 14 November 2015 review of submission by Vectormaxx323

Vectormaxx323 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Blank Banshee (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am requesting a re-review because the article is perfectly legitimate and contains valid and credible sources, independent of the artist, for all information contained within it.

FYI: This is a sockpuppet whose been pushing his or her agenda in two separate articles here - the one given above in the daft and over at vaporwave if I recall correctly. I've axed the draft and blocked the account, if you have any questions you can scope out Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/0000001Ghost or drop me a line on my talk page. TomStar81 (Talk) 17:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan

You have declined my submission with a reason that "the references do not adequately show the subject's notability".

I am very frustrated.I dont know what type of notability is required on wikipedia.I have provided all the string references.

Example:

1). Mufti Muhammad Akhtar Raza Khan Qaadiri Al-Azhari themuslim500.com

2). http://timesofindia.com/city/bareilly/Barelvi-cleric-in-most-powerful-Muslims-list/articleshow/44890599.cms

Morever all the claims are supported by these references.

What type of notability I have to show?

He is regarded as the Grand Mufti of India by the Sunni-barelvi Muslims,^[1]^[2] the majority of Indian subcontinent Muslims.^[3]^[4]

^ Barelvi school views SC fatwa order with caution Mrigank Tiwari,TNN | Jul 8, 2014, 09.41PM "Ala Hazrat's descendent Maulana Akhtar Raza Khan is the head of muftis across the country."
^ Mufti Muhammad Akhtar Raza Khan Qaadiri Al-Azhari themuslim500.com
^ [3] "Of them Barelvis are estimated to constitute between 80 to 85 % against 15 to 20 % Deobandis, 4% Ahle Hadith and Jamaat-e-Islami."
^ [4] "By one estimate, in Pakistan, the Shias are 18%, ismailis 2%, Ahmediyas 2%, Barelvis 50%, Deobandis 20%, Ahle Hadith 4%, and other minorities 4%".

Ejaz92 (talk) 17:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: The Crown of Ptolemy

Hi SwisterTwister. You requested my comment on the draft submitted by user Methychroma? I think it is acceptable. "Plot" section's a little long for my tastes, but that's not reason to decline submission. The only reason to decline would be a lacking reception section, which was not lacking (though I'm a little biased here, so please decide for yourself) until user Tokyogirl79's recent edits to the draft page removed several unreliable sources. Please see my post on the draft's talk page containing a new "Reception" section with justification. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source

Is this website a reliable source?--Vin09 (talk) 07:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vin09 Frankly I'm not familiar with that at all but simply from the appearance, it likely wouldn't be acceptable unless it can be shown it can be safely used. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Vin09 (talk) 07:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

4HANA Article

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you so much for reviewing and approving the SAP S/4HANA article. I truly appreciate it. However the correct title should be SAP S/4HANA and currently the title is shown as 4HANA. Would you please make this important edit? Thanks again! Olivia0452 (talk) 10:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Olivia0452[reply]

Help on Draft:Sarah Ellen Hay

Anna.urukova (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sarah Ellen Hay (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister....I would like to ask your help on improving Sarah Ellen Hay draft. I am newcomer and really need help. So please, I would be very grateful if you can help me. I have a suggestion regarding your comments...what if we position her more as ballet dancer and less as actress, because her primary occupation is professional ballet dancer. Will it help my draft to move to published article? I read all the articles about the notability etc. Anna.urukova (talk) 12:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of governors of Erbil

Hi , can you see this article and help me List of governors of Erbil

Thank you

Kurdistantolive (talk) 13:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13:28:58, 15 November 2015 review of submission by Power Forward

Power Forward (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Robert Charles McMaster (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You stated that my subject, an engineer who was known as the "grandfather of Nondestructive testing" with 19 patents, 300 technical papers and many inventions that changed human history was not noteworty. If this guy doen't rise to Wikipedia's standards noteworty-ness, who does then? I'm sorry but that's ridiculous. Please explain your thinking on this. Next, you weren't happy with the references. Why? They are verifiable. Please explain in detail.

15:03:12, 15 November 2015 review of submission by Ywangupeica

Ywangupeica (talk · contribs)
- User:Ywangupeica/Dew Computing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

15:06:36, 15 November 2015 review of submission by Ywangupeica

Ywangupeica (talk · contribs)
- User:Ywangupeica/Dew Computing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for reviewing my submission. In my understanding, you are mainly concerned about no multiple third-party reliable sources. On top of the references listed in the draft, over 30 scientific media published such information. You can find them on dewcomputing.org. These are all third-part reliable sources. Another point I hope you can consider: This article is not about websites or web content, it is about a computer science structure. Please reconsider and tell me your decision. Thanks.

06:29:53, 16 November 2015 review of submission by Baratrod

Baratrod (talk · contribs)
- User:Baratrod/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I gather that my submission was rejected because the subject was not notable enough. What can be more notable for a British artist other than to have paintings accepted by the Royal Society of Portrait painters on two consecutive years, and also to have a painting reproduced in a book on British Marine Artists?

What higher achievements are possible?

What should I do to represent his life?

I can take photos of his work through his career and in fact intended including selected ones, particularly the entry in the book, but presumed that the text should be established first.

Please advise.

Well Baratrod, the article certainly needs any more available sources overall and I'm also simply not sure if it satisfies artists notability guidelines. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:58:21, 16 November 2015 review of submission by 198.182.52.26

198.182.52.26 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Aishwarya Trust (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thanks for taking the time to review the article.

Could you please let me know exactly what you are looking for in terms of third party sources? I have included plenty of references from newspaper/magazine articles. Could you point out which statements you think are not sufficiently sourced? Maybe for the first draft, I can take those parts out. I assure you that it is a completely legitimate organization, and getting this article published would be a great help to us in our mission to spread awareness about the cause.

Request on 10:31:49, 16 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Anna.urukova

Anna.urukova (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sarah Ellen Hay (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Swister Twister,

Could you please have a look at this existing article about ballerina Irina Dvorovenko (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irina_Dvorovenko)? If you have a look at the sources, they are not much different from mine (which you consider not reliable to comply with actors guidelines). And Sarah Hay in my eyes is as notable as Irina Dvorovenko. So why Irina Dvorovenko wiki page exists and Sarah Hay's is not? Also considering the sources in this article about the series themselves...I don't see how sources here are more reliable than mine? However, this article was given a green light...PLEASE, MAKE IT CLEAR FOR ME! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesh_and_Bone_(miniseries)Anna.urukova (talk) 10:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anna.urukova (talk) 10:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Need your help

Hi, I am new to Wikipedia and wrote an article draft Draft:Akshay_Agrawal which you rejected on grounds of being not notable enough. As I saw it, there were copious number of sources. Could you please help me understand what can be done to make it notable ?

Was it the quality of the sources or the quantity of the sources that was insufficient ?
Could you provide me a few examples incontext of person biographies that would make it notable ? Like would an article from a REALLY Famous blog do ?
Would something like a TEDx talk be counted notable? im really lost on what would count as notable in this SPECIFIC case.

Also, I wrote the article because there is another person named Siddharth_Shetty who has similar and almost comparable sources. So that is where i am not able to understand what was wrong. I think this is WP:Other Stuff Exists?

Looking forward to hearing from you and workin gto improve the article ? Cheers Agrawal.akshay98 (talk) 10:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SwisterTwister (talk · contribs), would appreciate if you could help me out. Cheers Agrawal.akshay98 (talk) 10:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:55:55, 16 November 2015 review of submission by Maddelamia

Maddelamia (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Osteoware (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, the draft for Osteoware has been denied again. It was denied on November 1st initially for only having two sources. I am confused as to why it was denied again, because it has 8 cited sources and 13 additional resources relevant to the subject. FORDISC is a related software used by biological anthropologists (specifically forensic anthropologists) and it has a Wikipedia page. Biological Anthropologists use both FORDISC and Osteoware together when studying skeletal remains. Osteoware is an essential software to the field of biological anthropology and is run by the Smithsonian. I am confused about why it wasn't accepted because the referencing is verifiable and has secondary sources. I really would like to get this topic approved by Wikipedia and have no personal involvement with Osteoware. This is the first article I have tried to create in Wikipedia. Please let me know exactly how I could improve this. Thank you, maddelamia

SAP S/4HANA article

Hi SwisterTwister, thank you for approving the SAP S/4HANA article. However, the article title is incorrect. It reads as "4HANA" The correct product name is "SAP S/4HANA" and I hope you can make this minor yet important edit. Thank you! Harper70 (talk) 17:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Harper70[reply]

17:21:11, 16 November 2015 review of submission by Xenith711

Xenith711 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Cloudcade (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, since your last comment, even more sources have been added to the references within the draft. Further, the game has now been released globally, accruing over 1million downloads worldwide. The Company as well as the Game have both won awards and contests in the gaming space since 2014 and have been building up a following across their social media channels. Given the latest info, I believe that both the Company as well as the Game are both Notable enough to meet the Wiki guidlines for warranting an article. The article is also very objectively, and clearly not meant for promotional purposes. Could you please kindly approve the article and make the draft live? Thanks!

18:31:42, 16 November 2015 review of submission by Hrboe

Hrboe (talk · contribs)
- Draft:BBGM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I've added some more significant references. I would also like some assistance if those do not turn out to be enough.

Hey David, Thanks for editing my BBGM draft. I was wondering if you could help me with some general issues I've been running into regarding displaying the company's noteworthiness? While I've edited some articles before, this is the first article I've ever created from scratch, so I'm still trying to get the hang of things. The biggest problem I've been experiencing is that even though the firm gets a large amount of coverage, most of it is about the company's architectural projects and not the company itself. For example, they were recently contracted to design the renovations for the Watergate Hotel. Obviously, the Watergate is a pretty a big deal, being both ultra high-luxury and historically significant, so they aren't just going to hire anyone to renovate it. They'd only hire a very well-known and highly-regarded company. All the news related to the topic, however, only focuses on how the Watergate is going to look when it's finished. And last year, Forbes dedicated an entire article to a suite they designed. Not even a hotel, a single suite! But unfortunately, other than trade journals, the news media isn't really all that interested in learning about the guys behind the scenes. BBGM is a big name in the architectural community, and their projects get a lot of media attention from big news sources like The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, etc.. It's just that the company itself isn't really in the public eye all that much. Because of this, it's not easy to fit news related to BBGM into a Wikipedia article about them. Any suggestions on ways I might be able to solve this problem? I'm thinking that maybe if I format the page differently, such as make the "significant projects" section paragraph-form instead of a list, I'll be able to make citations to articles about their projects work more easily within the context of the page. I thought I'd see if you had any suggestions before I tried it out though. Whatever the case, I've added a bunch more references to the page, including two references to Forbes and one to CNBC. I've also added a section about BBGM buildings that have been used as sets for movie. So please let me know if you think those would be enough. I now have more sources cited now than the pages of every other architecture firm in DC combined do. Literally.

Thanks,

Hrboe 18:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

PS: In case you haven't noticed already, it looks like someone mistakenly put a post at the very top of your User Talk page. Just thought I'd let you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrboe (talk • contribs) 20:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: After speaking to some other members at the Teahouse, I've come to realize that an architectural firm may be more suited to the notability guidelines of Creative Professionals (WP:AUTHOR), rather than those of organizations and companies (WP:CORP), as the "creative professionals" section directly mentions architects. Hrboe (talk) 22:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19:31:54, 16 November 2015 review of submission by Attichelper

Attichelper (talk · contribs)
- Draft:H. Lyman Saÿen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't know of any other sources that would be appropriate to cite at this time. Last week I went to Philadelphia to visit the Sketch Club. They may have more archival material and I have requested information from them. I am also going to verify that Jeannette Hope actually did work that was published in The North American...those materials are available at the Library of Congress. Once I get a chance to see these sources, I will add them.

Tasha Chiu speedy deletion

Hello,

I removed your CSD tag on Tasha Chiu. I think there is substantial doubt about whether this person is sufficiently notable to be in the encyclopedia, but it is not a clear-cut case - there is meaningful coverage of her by an independent source, and honestly even being a TV host in a significant market like Vancouver is probably a credible claim of significance in its own right. It therefore follows that the article is not appropriate for speedy deletion. I suggest taking it to AfD to find out what the community's view of local notability might be in a case such as this.

Cheers,

Thparkth (talk) 00:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasha Chiu DGG ( talk ) 17:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07:03:17, 17 November 2015 review of submission by MpMe2015

MpMe2015 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mauro Patricelli, musician (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE ERROR: [1] Cite error: A ^[1] (see the help page). [2][3][4] [5] [6] WHAT IS THIS I HAVE CHECKED THE BRACKETS.. they seemed to be closed..

MpMe2015 One of the first listed references at the top, the second one, was missing the last "/" with the <ref> (i.e. </ref> is used at the end for a reference). Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MpMe2015 Yes, what the article needs is better coverage meaning third-party sources such as news and magazine to at least satisfy musicians notability (or also general notability, basic and biographies (guidelines). Better third-party sources is especially important for establishing notability so add any available links. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MpMe2015 It's worth noting it's not necessary to resubmit another review at this page as I'll simply comment at the first one. The listed sources are not enough and needs any more available to satisfy general notability guidelines. If you need to respond, simply comment below here. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:54:05, 17 November 2015 review of submission by Pianogac

Pianogac (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Olga Jegunova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am left not really knowing what you want re the Olga Jegunova draft! Of the 12 references 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11 are 3rd part sources. Number 4 is YouTube but are you suggesting this is a fake video?! Number 9 is on her website but it does demonstrate that she had a master class with Andras Schiff, one of the most respected live classical pianists, unless you think this is a fake too! Number 12 is a YouTube video but is from a BBC production - surely the BBC can be accepted as an independent source?!

I really need detailed reasons why you reject this version or otherwise we are both wasting our time!

Help!

Thanks

Geoff Cox

Request on 11:04:12, 17 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Andershoghansen

Andershoghansen (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Eugene Haynes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SisterTwister. Thank you for your review of Eugene Haynes, a new entry by me (andershoghansen). You asked for more sources overall. However, it has over 10 sources already (and over 20 footnotes). Almost everything you can find on the internet plus additional material from the musuems and interview with curator has been used. The sources are also variedL; journalistic, museum-curatorial texts, letter and diary writing by Haynes himself, an obiturary, and other. I don't think the notability can be questioned. Can you be more specific about where you think sources are missings? Best wishes Anders

Andershoghansen (talk) 11:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:13:10, 17 November 2015 review of submission by Andershoghansen

Andershoghansen (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Eugene Haynes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi again SwisterTwister. I just wrote you and was curious about what other sources, for improving Eugene Haynes. Yet, I find some indications in the draft by you and others I think and have begun complementing the piece with further sources. So thanks again. Anders PS. I am not asking for a re-review or other reviewer, I will add sources and edit, resubmit and see what happens.

Request on 13:41:52, 17 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Ivan Mato

Ivan Mato (talk · contribs)
- Draft:NEXTEV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello SwisterTwister, thank you so much for your review of the NEXTEV Article. Still learning my way around wikipedia one step at at time! I have now looked at the guidelines for notability and properly referenced significant coverage in reliable, independent third party sources. I would be delighted to hear your feedback. Many thanks in advance. Ivan

Ivan Mato (talk) 13:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:25:49, 17 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Sonofpercy

Sonofpercy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:John Robert Wildman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for the feedback. I have read the Wikipedia advice that you have directed me to, but I am not sure that I can improve the article sufficiently to satisfy you from the sources currently available to me. I have used secondary sources – newspaper and magazine reviews and books – that are independent of the subject, but when you ask me to improve the submission’s referencing, I am not sure whether you are saying that there are insufficient secondary sources, or whether you are just saying that the citations are inadequate (or perhaps both). If the former, then I will try and find some more sources, but I don’t think that will be easy. If the latter then, having read the advice on citing sources, the only additions that appear to be needed are page numbers. These I can add, as I have copies of the relevant publications, but would that be sufficient? If it is not just page numbers, what more do the citations lack in order to make them verifiable? If the main reason for not accepting the article is that I have not demonstrated notability sufficiently, then – as I seem to have exhausted the reference sources available to me at the present time – I fear that I will have to abandon the submission for the time being. If so, what happens to the draft article? Does it get deleted, or does it remain on the Wikipedia web site as a draft article? If the latter, then I will carry on editing as new reference sources become available to me, although I will not resubmit unless substantial new sources appear. Sonofpercy (talk) 16:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC) Sonofpercy (talk) 16:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Barb Horse

Hi, I came across this article through WPEQ and I seriously doubt it's needed. We already have a fairly good article on Spanish Mustangs, which are basically the same thing. This kind of thing is ridiculously common in the horse world. Somebody likes a particular breed of horse but doesn't like the association that controls that breed, so they form their own association, changing the breed name to make it seem different... 😛 (See Kentucky Mountain Saddle Horse and Rocky Mountain Horse for a prime example.) Anyway, I was just going to say that even though I'm usually an inclusionist, I don't really want to see more articles like this because they are more trouble than they're worth. They get written by promoters who don't get that Wikipedia is not a commercial. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 20:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04:35:28, 18 November 2015 review of submission by Blessedtern2014

Blessedtern2014 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Alex Wyse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I'm confused about why nine third-party sources aren't enough to validate the page. This actor has appeared twice on Broadway, and is currently performing in the acclaimed Deaf West Spring Awakening Revival. What other references need to be added to validate this?

Blessedtern2014 I'm simply not sure if it satisfies actors and entertainers notability guidelines so please add any more available sources about him overall. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

If I need any help, I will be sure to ask here! Granolalover (talk) 07:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:11:21, 18 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by MpMe2015

MpMe2015 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mauro Patricelli, musician (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

THE ARTICLE HAS BEEN REJECTED - AND YET YOU WRITE IN THE GUIDELINES TAHT THE SUBJECT SHOULD MEET AT LEAST ONE of the following:

Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition- MAURO PATRICELLI HAS BEEN CREDITED AS HE RELEASED SEVERAL OPERAS, REFERENCES ON PAGE CONFRIM THIS! Has written musical theatre of some sort (includes musicals, operas, etc.) that was performed in a notable theatre that had a reasonable run as such things are judged in their particular situation and time. - MAURO PATRICELLI HAS RELEASED SEVERAL OPERAS, REFERENCES ON PAGE CONFRIM THIS!

MpMe2015 (talk) 08:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MpMe2015 Happenning to look in, one thing that would help is to remove the promotional language/ We describe, not praise. Another is to cite every item, as we do for bios of living people. A third is to remove the list of composers who have influenced him, unless there are third party sources for each one. And which ofhis works havereceived morethan a single performance? And which of his recordings have won prizes or even been reviewed? DGG ( talk ) 17:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:12:54, 18 November 2015 review of submission by Rkc1818

Rkc1818 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Yashar lachayal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi can you please give me a ballpark figure of how many more sources I need? And if there are any other issues with the page?

Rkc1818 Looking in, it's not just a question of how many , but that they need to be references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. What you have are mere listings. DGG ( talk ) 17:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:00:03, 18 November 2015 review of submission by Nittennair

Nittennair (talk · contribs)
- Draft:MuchTV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you for your review. It would be really helpful if you could let me know what more I can add to get this article approved. There are a few more articles for reference but they are in Arabic.Nittennair (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18 Nov 2015 review of submission by User:Sam Parsons 1981

Hello, I noticed that you declined the article Draft:Missrepresent for now on the grounds that it does not have enough independent sources. A user called YellowFig39 came into IRC asking about it, I assume it's the same person as User:Sam Parsons 1981. I decided to ask you to elaborate. Here are a list of domains where information is sourced from. The ones I regard as independent are marked in bold. The ones I doubt on sight I didn't mark as bold.

missrepresent.com
twitter.com (social network profile)
taipeitimes.com
soundcloud.com (music host of subject)
nicetalent.co.uk (booking site for artist among others)
mobygames.com
formationrecords.databeats.com (record label owned by others)
beatport.com (sells artist's music)
welovejungle.com
junodownload.com (currently malformed in the article, doesn't link to right search, does not back claim that subject runs Sliced Note Recordings)
dnbmuzik.com
facebook.com (National Drum and Bass Awards results 2012)
djmag.com
bbc.co.uk
scunthorpenights.co.uk
flavourmag.co.uk
pump-audio.com

Many of these also host interviews conducted and published by third party online newspapers and music enthusiast sites. It would be very helpful if you please elaborate on how many more independent sources this article needs. There seem to be a lot compared to the conventions on other articles. Thank you. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 11:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

pings

I don't bother with the ones whose result is obvious. I also try to find some that can be done via speedy. And since I was here , I decided to help a little. DGG ( talk ) 17:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:33:07, 18 November 2015 review of submission by P. Utopia

P. Utopia (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Women Help Women (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. The reason I am making this request is because if I compare the article I'm trying to submit to the article of Women On Web (that is an organisation that makes the exact same work as Women Help Women https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_on_Web) the page I'm trying to submit is more complete, with better citations and with more articles proving visibility. The used criteria doesn't seem to be the same. Thank you for your attention.

19:53:33, 18 November 2015 review of submission by 2601:480:8501:BA00:608A:5CAA:F471:B2F4

2601:480:8501:BA00:608A:5CAA:F471:B2F4 (talk · contribs)
- User:Matthewmbury/Steelism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey David, this is the first wikipedia page I've attempted to make so I'm hoping you can shed a little extra light for me. Has the page been rejected because I simply did not cite enough sources or is there a certain claim / language that needs to be revised? Any direction advice you can give me, would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance, 2601:480:8501:BA00:608A:5CAA:F471:B2F4 (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Connie Fournier Draft

Thanks for reviewing my submission at Draft:Connie_Fournier. I have cleaned up the draft so that the reference show better how she is notable. She is more of an activist than an author and I believe the references show she meets guidelines.

Some of these references have her by another name (Connie Wilkins). If it is possible to take a closer look at the article and let me know what, if anything, needs improved I would appreciate it. Thank you again for the original advice and I look forward to your comments. Thanks again. --Finnythedog (talk) 22:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Phillips (actress)

You may want to edit your remarks. You omitted a vital "non". Happens, I know! John from Idegon (talk) 22:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:25:17, 18 November 2015 review of submission by Avata666

Avata666 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Studienrat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Avata666 (talk) 22:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Thanks for you review and the comments![reply]

I made all the suggested changes and added a lot of official references. I got help from the live chat and got green light from there.

The title/rank of Studienrat is still a part of the Austrian and German Beamte System and a very important part of Austrian and German history. Even in movies or historic articles or official documents the rank/title of Studienrat is always mentioned.

A lot of foreign students get in contact with holders of the title/rank of Studienrat at University and trying to get informations about it. Adding this article will help understanding the German education system and history.

Stress measurement in aviation

You rejected it, the original author just moved it. I presume the next step would be an AFD?Naraht (talk) 22:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04:09:26, 19 November 2015 review of submission by APpagekeeper

APpagekeeper (talk · contribs)
- Draft:AP (Thailand) Plc. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Swister Twister. First of all, thank you for taking your time to review my article. However, I'm still not quite sure why my references are inadequate. I consider my cited sources are quite notable like Reuter, Bloomberg, Financial Times, and Bangkok Post (The most popular English newspaper in Thailand). Perhaps you can help clarify a bit more so that I can move forward in the right direction. Thank you so much.

APpagekeeper The article seems interesting and has potential but I'm simply not sure if there are enough sources to satisfy companies notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 04:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help with a Page Blanker

Sorry to disturb you, but we have been having some trouble with the Odinism page. The reasons are unclear, but one editor keeps trying to erase the entire page or make it disappear. (Also, she keeps attacking the people editing it). Any suggestions? Thanks. --Holtj (talk) 05:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am the editor in question, and must warn you that Holtj is being disingenous. I must point out that Holtj is under a sock puppet investigation, with one of their alleged socks, User:ThorLives, also being a persistent disruptive editor currently the subject of a community discussion regarding a topic ban. (Indeed, the Holtj account appears to have been re-activated to avoid the current scrutiny on the ThorLives account). This editor has created a travesty in the form of the Odinism article (replete with non-referenced information and non-reliably referenced information), all with the intent of creating a WP:Coatrack for the main Heathenry (new religious movement) article, which they are deeply unhappy with because it doesn't present the religion to which they subscribe in a way that they approve of. Their attempts to enlist you to their side in this debate reflects the fact that they have been unable to find support for their actions anywhere else. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Anyway, she keeps trying to blank the page (when she is not attacking editors.) Any suggestions? --Holtj (talk) 06:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Zpeopleheart. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Siege of Baghdad (1743), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Zpeopleheart (talk) 07:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review

@SwisterTwister:Chandrala, Mylavaram mandal you reviewed, but check its talk page once, it says Talk:Chandrala,_Near_Gudivada. It has some issues please wait for some time as it filed at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Chandrala.--Vin09 (talk) 08:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article mathdaybfmint.doc for review: I quote my another German source for my History form the Baden Wuerttemberg government: Quotation from the internet in http://www.landeswettbewerb-mathematik.de

email: hanspeter.eichhorn@landeswettbewerb-mathematik.de

https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Landeswettbewerb_Mathematik_Baden-W%C3%BCrttemberg&action=edit

Landeswettbewerb Mathematik Baden-Württemberg...

Geschichte

Die Struktur der Landeswettbewerbe richtet sich an den entsprechenden Bundeswettbewerben und an fachgebundenen Olympiaden für Schüler aus. Die Initiative zu den lokalen, süddeutschen Wettbewerben kam vom Tag der Mathematik, der seit 1985 in Baden-Württemberg an Universitäten stattfindet. Er wurde von MINT (Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften, Technik) an der Universität Ulm^[2] getragen, in Zusammenarbeit mit hessischen Veranstaltern. Außer dem eintägigen Wettbewerb werden in diesem Programm Sommerschulen oder Kurse^[3] mit Universitätsprofessoren oder -dozenten als Lehrer für Schüler aus der Region einer Universität angeboten. Die Schüler haben dabei die Möglichkeit, einen späteren Studienort kennenzulernen, ihr Talent mit Schülern anderer Schulen zu vergleichen und Freundschaften unter Gleichtalentierten zu schließen.

References

^ tag is missing the closing
^ Gudrun Kalmbach: Tag der Mathematik. Begleithefte, Universität Ulm, 1985–2002
^ Tagungsbände 1-27 zu MINT (Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften, Technik). (herausgegeben mit dem Editorial Board: O. Baumgärtner, R. Berger, W. Brübach, A. Dvurecenskij, M. Grimm, O. Grosek, W. Hauptvogel, P. Hitzler, F. Houdek, V. Janis, G. Kalmbach, F. J. Klingen, O. Lange, B. Riecan, Z. Riecanova), Aegis-Verlag, Ulm und MINT Verlag, Bad Wörishofen 1997–2013

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Swpb. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, List of WWE double champions, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. —Swpb^talk 15:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:27:16, 19 November 2015 review of submission by NMSWizard

NMSWizard (talk · contribs)
- Draft:CirrusPoint (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have added another reference for CirrusPoint from linked in and I noticed that it mentions no images found. but when I click on Cirruspoint I see the CirrusPoint logo shown multiple times?

Woodcraft Supply draft

Is there anything that can be added to help prove notability and make this draft page go live? WinCo Foods is a similar size chain to Draft:Woodcraft_Supply, however, there are many more sources referencing Woodcraft stores or magazine, including some larger publications such as The New York Times. In addition to the US stores, the magazine and catalog give Woodcraft an international footprint across 117 countries. Woodcraft is certainly notable within the woodworking industry and for hobbyists. In that context it seems odd that it is not already included in Wikipedia (I suppose there may not be a big cross-over of woodworking enthusiasts and Wikipedia contributors). Atsmith227 (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:42:35, 19 November 2015 review of submission by LG Brichetto

LG Brichetto (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Parables TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

SwisterTwister. I have improved the Parables TV Network article and added more sources and their logo. The logo was uploaded with Wikipedia's copywrite permission template completed and emailed to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. It may still be pending review. Can you please review the article and advise if it's good to go, or do you want me to do more work on it? Thanks very much. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Parables_TV LG Brichetto (talk) 22:42, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19 Nov review of submission by T McNellis on Kami Lyle

Thanks for the quick review, David, and I have spent some time looking through (again) the notability guidelines as well as the GNG. I'm admittedly a newbie when it comes to this, and the extensive thought that went into creating the guidelines is very interesting and thought provoking, but I readily welcome your help and guidance. Realizing now that notability is not merely a popularity contest (i.e. sheer number of references) I took a hard look at the quality of the references and am in the process of pulling out references that are weak, and adding more independent references. In general, is there a rule of thumb for a musician regarding selection of the type and quantity of references? Tmcnellis15 (talk) 02:44, 20 November 2015 (UTC) Tmcnellis15 (talk) 02:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tmcnellis15 Not particularly, simply bands and musicians notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 03:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... I've made the updates after spending some time reviewing additional sources. Let me know if you think I over-did it (i.e. too much quantity)! Tmcnellis15 (talk) 04:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you gave me an interesting challenge and in the process I was able to improve my skills in literature and new searches! I’ve included a bunch of additional third party references to give a more varied and global view of this artist. In keeping with the wikipedia guidelines, I’ve tried to include only reliable sources and have removed questionable ones like examiner.com. Overall for notability, here’s what I think I’m seeing for this artist: subject of multiple published works (Encyclopedia of Popular Music 4th Edition, numerous articles in Billboard, NPR, national press); plus two full length albums (although one is independently produced) but there are several others on significant labels where she is credited as composer and performer of one of the tracks; significant activity with national artists and national media on major networks; and won several awards in what I believe are national songwriting contests. Hope this helps…. Tmcnellis15 (talk) 07:28, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:26:19, 20 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Rburtonresearch

Rburtonresearch (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Elements of Sound (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi. The submission of my draft of "The Elements of Sound" has been declined with the message "This looks more like a journal report rather than a formal encyclopaedia article". I would appreciate it if you would advise me of how to turn it into an encyclopaedia article. Should I use the same format as "the elements of Art"? Is there a different model I should use?

Is there something wrong with the information? I can assure you it is well researched.

Perhaps the use of the expression of "the elements" needs to be elaborated and differentiated between definitions of rudimentary elements and perceptual elements. The intent is to identify a list of discrete elements of sound which are both comprehensive (make up all forms of sound) and can be independently manipulated.

Similar definitions can be found in a variety of areas:

law: element of a crime (or element of an offense) is one of a set of facts that must all be proven to convict a defendant of a crime

Chemical element, a pure substance consisting of one type of atom in mathematics, an element, or member, of a set is any one of the distinct objects that make up that set. in philosophy Classical elements, the ancient belief about the fundamental types of matter (usually four in number), expressed in their Aristotelian forms as fire, earth, air, and water Rburtonresearch (talk) 07:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rburtonresearch (talk) 07:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rburtonresearch If you want you can base it from elements of art but also feel welcome and encouraged to make even better than that, I would suggest seeing WP:Writing better articles and WP:Your first article which has some helpful information and also simply overall making the current draft better. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 07:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions. I will look at all of them and revise over the next couple of weeks. Rburtonresearch (talk) 08:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:07:56, 20 November 2015 review of submission by 192.77.239.241

192.77.239.241 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Michael Chou (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi David,

Just wanted to check in as I added several new sources. Please let me know if you can go ahead and approve. Thanks!

Best, Grace

08:22:19, 20 November 2015 review of submission by 192.77.239.241

192.77.239.241 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Michael Chou (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi David,

I've added several highly reputable sources including Bloomberg, Princeton University, Thomson Reuters, Fortune Magazine, and The Washington Post.

Best, Grace

08:25:43, 20 November 2015 review of submission by Jmsieber

Jmsieber (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Hans Danuser (artist) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello

Thank you for your review. I don't understand why the sources www.sikart.ch which is a scientific portal of the SIK-ISEA, the international recognized swiss institute for art research shouldn't be a reliable source. The same goes to the Fotostiftung Schweiz (www.fotostiftung.ch). Can you explain me that? I found several swiss photographers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Swiss_photographers) which do have the same reliable sources and are published since long ago in the EN-wikipedia. How could this happen? Did the criteria chance? Concerning the notability of the photographer: He won several times the Swiss Art Award (1974, 1976, 1983, 1985), did more than one Art Stipend in the States and elsewhere and got exhibitions in the States (like New Museum, NY), Germany, France, Belgium, Italy (Biennial of Venice), and Switzerland.

Thank you for your support.

Kind regards

Joachim

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule.

I wasn't actually emphasizing about that, I was emphasizing the need for any more available third-party sources overall. Cheers Jmsieber, SwisterTwister talk 08:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:08:13, 20 November 2015 review of submission by MountainPleasure

MountainPleasure (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mountain Pleasure Horse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing my article. I am asking that you accept the article with the references I have listed. I am quite certain that any other references I could possibly locate would be either unreliable in regards to accuracy or simply copied from the sources I have listed. I am referring to the MPHA website in particular as it is the official online site of the Mountain Pleasure Horse breed association and is maintained by individuals committed to accurately presenting historic and current events pertaining to the breed. The non-url references are taken from vintage publications which are few and difficult to come by. In writing this article, I have attempted to locate and reference all known documentation in order to write a complete and accurate article and I do hope Wikipedia will accept it as written. Thank you so much for your time and consideration.MountainPleasure (talk) 11:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hadyn Ellis

You declined the new page about the academic Draft:Hadyn Ellis on the grounds of not being a notable person. He was an academic and this is what the notable guidelines say about academics: Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Of the critieria listed he meets at least 4 of them.

Further: He even has a building named after him - surely that is a sufficient secondary source. He coined a term which is now a major sub discipline of psychology.

Does this make him sufficiently notable?Psy7k (talk) 11:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your constant page reviewing! :) RugbyXIII (talk) 12:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cenduit Page Review 11/20

Hi. Thank you for reviewing my submission for the Draft: Cenduit page. I was wondering what exactly needed to be done for the article to be published. Did you mean that there needed to be more sources for the article? Thank you Cenduitllc (talk) 17:54, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stress measurement in aviation

I think the fate of that article was the result of a series of misunderstandings and mistakes (as you can see from the article's history). I propose returning the article to the student's userspace, and making sure that they understand how they should proceed (ie, don't move it to mainspace in this state). I wanted to clear it with you, as the nominator, that userfying it was an acceptable outcome. Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Martineck

Hey, just wanted to follow up on the Sophia Martineck page. Was there one source in particular that should be replaced? I have a few more that I could substitute. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdhambro (talk • contribs) 17:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cloudcade

Hi! What else can I do on the Draft: Cloudcade to get a submission approval? There are no more additional sources at this time in English that I can find. The Company is mostly substantiated by its products which is notable and well referenced all across the internet. Can you please kindly approve this draft? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.212.36.2 (talk) 20:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Envision Energy Draft

Hi! Our company page has been declined again Draft: Envision Energy, in which you said we need more third-party sources. How many more do you need? There isn't a lot of media coverage online about our business, since we are in a traditional B2B industry with a lot of things happening offline. As our main operation is based in China, there are more sources in Chinese, but limited amount in English. Would it be alright if we include some sources in Chinese? Thank you. Windeditor123880 (talk) 21:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Windeditor123880, however many are there available including that they're enough for companies notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 21:54, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23:46:55, 20 November 2015 review of submission by Meafisher

Meafisher (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mea Fisher (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Just curious why i can't get my page published. This is the second time I have been denied, I have done everything i can think of to make this go live and i am completely stumped as to what the problem is. Please help! What do I need to do???

02:08:32, 21 November 2015 review of submission by Stormnews89

Stormnews89 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Life Matters Media (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I appreciate your feedback on my latest submission. I worked with other users to remedy the page and hopefully get it accepted. I like love for you to please take another look. I linked to mostly articles by major news organizations and took out "peacock" language.

Stormnews89 (talk) 02:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04:32:36, 21 November 2015 review of submission by C toney

C toney (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mongabay.org (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your comments and taking the time to review my submission. I added additional third party source to demonstrate notability. Mongabay's websites draw almost 3 million visitors a month, while the organization has over 200 correspondents, translators, and staff, so it significant entity. Thanks for reconsidering.

Mosaic451

Thank you for reviewing my article on Mosaic451. I am a little disappointed that it didn't make it this time especially since the company has achieved a top 10 rating by CSO Outlook magazine and has been recognized in The Channel Company's exclusive 2015 CRN[R] Next-Gen 250 list. Can you suggest further areas where it might achieve the notability required? Nmwalsh (talk) 12:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confused Regarding Rejection of Submission

Thank you for taking the time to read my submission for a Wikipedia article. The feedback I received for rejection was due to the subject not being notable enough for inclusion. The subject's bands are extremely popular, they are currently performing in sold out arenas, one of the subject's bands has their own Wikipedia article already, which references this subject. Another band member also has his own Wikipedia page. The subject is endorsed by a major drum manufacturing company, the subject's albums are available for download on iTunes, etc. Many other bands/band members related to the subject are also widely available on Wikipedia. All of this information has been referenced in the article I submitted. If the issue is improper referencing I'm happy to oblige if you would be more specific about what the concern is. Simply saying the subject is not notable enough doesn't quite seem to fit the bill. The subject is all over YouTube, has been interviewed for Natural High, performed at Warped Tour. The subject's achievements are more than notable. Less notable individuals have articles of their own. Would you please clarify further what is considered notable if this individual does not fit the bill?

ALLB0808123 (talk) 17:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC) ALLB0808123[reply]

Tenth Church draft

Thanks for the feedback on Draft: Tenth Church: The comment regarding "depth of coverage" crystallizes for me the issues with this entry about an otherwise notable organization, even with two major independent sources and national media coverage. I'll see what other third-party commentary on the organization exists, if any!

Columbiensis (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

journlists

I have no special expertise in this area. And in areas where I do, the optimal time for me to look is to help prevent a no-consensus or relisting, not at the start. ``

DGG I agree and understand but you know I always welcome you to comment at my AfDs (especially the ones with fields you're familiar with and since you can't keep track of all noms).

BTW, I noticed you edited Woolrich a few minutes, what lead you to that article? (I ask because I participated heavily with improving and regularly visit it to see if all is well). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had listed it for editing some time ago--possibly because you'd worked on it restoring some promotional cuts --I didn't remember what I intended, but I was trying to clear out some of my backlist & I made one of my usual improvements just to do something. DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also have to thank you again Dave for finally deleting some of these articles I'm speedying (all thanks to my voracious time at Special:RandomInCategory) and I've been spending all day tagging the most obvious for deletion (certainly saves AfD some time and efforts!). SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:10:58, 22 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Pianogac

Pianogac (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Olga Jegunova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello - you have rejected my efforts for the Olga Jegunova article - I posted a question to you asking for more detailed help as I have listed 12 references many of which are independent - but! My question has disappeared from your list and so I do not know if you replied! Can you repost your reply please?!

Pianogac (talk) 08:10, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm बिप्लब आनन्द. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Mahika Sharma, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Biplab Anand (Talk with me) 12:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isabel Sabogal

Dear David: Already it added five references and seven external links. Are not enough reliable sources? Unfortunately none of them is in English, but is that the author belongs to another cultural circle. Sorry if this message contains mistakes. English is not my language. talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC) Sorry. Thi's my signature: Orlandina) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.7.92.48 (talk) 18:56, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CSD A7 tags

Hi,

I notice you've been tagging articles CSD A7 on notability grounds, judging by your edit summaries. That's not what A7 is about; it's about there not being a credible claim of significance (not notability; they are not the same thing). The claim does not even need to be true to fail A7, nor does it need to be sourced or verifiable. Non-notablity alone is not a criterion for speedy deletion, and it doesn't matter how non-notable an article's subject is; if there is a credible claim of significance, it's not an A7. Although you're not the first person I've come across who evidently misunderstands A7, I'm surprised you didn't know this as you've been here for 7 years, whereas I've only been here for 7 months! Adam9007 (talk) 01:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I very much wish you hadn't declined Minerva Mendez though Adam9007 because I searched and she actually doesn't have any obvious "acting work" (therefore nothing "credible") and all I found was a 2016 planned movie. It seems she is active with social media but certainly nothing notable. Simply look at the history as well as and you'll see two IPs which seemed to have been the subject herself blanked the page twice. SwisterTwister talk 02:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SwisterTwister: I didn't decline it per se; I'm not an admin. We are, however, allowed to disagree and remove the tag. I thought the claim about Minerva Mendez gaining media attention is probably a credible claim of significance. If you think she, or any of the other articles are not notable, go ahead and nominate them (AfD or PROD) on those grounds. Adam9007 (talk) 02:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adam9007 Yes but the question is what "media attention" as I found nothing at all (all I find is her own primary websites). This seemed like an easy speedy rather than spending its time at AfD (although I may avidly consider PROD). SwisterTwister talk 02:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SwisterTwister:For the purposes of A7, it's irrelevant. If the claim is credible (and I think it is), it's not an A7. If you can't find anything to support it, it's either non-notable or a hoax. A7 is not about verifiability. Adam9007 (talk) 02:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DJ Montay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

09:27:19, 23 November 2015 review of submission by Omerh88

Omerh88 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Burn Advocates Network (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for the feedback. I added 2 third-party sources and now have 11. Is the problem in the sources or the content itself?

The sources currently include Channel 10 (one of two Commercial Broadcast Channels in Israel), Haaretz (Israel's oldest newspaper) and the Jewish Standard.

Thanks

09:44:15, 23 November 2015 review of submission by Mandymlall

Mandymlall (talk · contribs)
- Draft:New Media Vision (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you pleases explain how I might correct this mistake and have my article published please? I have been unsuccessful in my submissions thus far. Can you advise if it require more referencing as i've tried to reference every sentence, or what other steps I can do to ensure this article is successfully submitted to articles for creation.

Mandy Mandymlall (talk) 09:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Mike Steib

Hi David,

Thank you so much for taking the time to review Draft: Mike Steib twice now. I know you play an important role in maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia platform.

I am writing to follow up about the most recent rejection of this draft. Mike Steib is an expert in the internet business space. This has been noted on the Wikipedia draft by the thirteen high-profile news sources that have interviewed him for insight on the subject. I have included no less than 38 references from reputable sources, as defined by Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. This is far more than other pages of comparable executives, and also more than others on your talk page who complain about the number of sources you require. I would greatly appreciate your acceptance of this submission, or at least a more detailed response regarding steps that can be taken to ensure the publication of this biography. With sources already including The New York Times, CNN, Bloomberg and Fox News I am not sure what other sources you expect to be included.

Thank you again for your work to improve Wikipedia. I assure you that publishing Draft:Mike Steib will only benefit the Wikipedia community.

LJacobs2195 (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:38:44, 23 November 2015 review of submission by Ndecubas

Ndecubas (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Regenestem (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am requesting a re-review because I have taken out the press release articles and added more viable ones. I would also like to note that the company is a BBB Accredited business, if that helps the case in any way. Thank You, and let me know if there is anything else I can add.

Ndecubas (talk) 15:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:12:25, 23 November 2015 review of submission by 184.183.165.106

184.183.165.106 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Zesty.io (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! I thought this was a pretty credible and unbiased list of sources. Looking at comparable CMS wikis', my list of sources seems to be adequate. What exactly could I do to add to this so it meets Wikipedia's standards?

Draft:School of Journalism and Mass Communications - re-review request

Hey SwisterTwister, I believe I have corrected the notability issues by adding several more third-party sources, as well as additional content. Hopefully this is up to Wiki standards. Thank you - Cravennn (talk) 19:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew_Stevens_(musician) - request change of headline

Hello SwisterTwister, I would like to request to change the article title to Matthew Stevens (guitarist). Please advise how I can do this? Thanks so much for your help! - Ongaku+ongaku(Ongaku ongaku (talk) 20:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Well Ongaku ongaku, I added "musician" because there is no other musician article so there's no other likely article for that although if it's needed, I can change it (disambiguations are what is more relevant and likely). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 20:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

review of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:DBMaestro

Hi! I have changed the language quite a bit to make sure i describe and not praise. Also, there are many third party sources cited, all independent of the company. The company is notable because it is the first that has created this technology. any additional help/guidance would be much appreciated! Nerminsaleemi (talk) 21:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:21:19, 23 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mojobadshah

Mojobadshah (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Magic (religion) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister, kindly address what content needs to be improved upon specifically in order to improve the content in my article on "magic (religion)"Mojobadshah (talk) 22:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mojobadshah (talk) 22:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page you rejected was created separately

Hi, I saw on the talk page for the creator of Thamizhz Thiyagarajan that you'd rejected an AFC on it earlier today for lack of notability. Looks like it was then created separately with the same issues, thought I would bring it to your attention to review. JamesG5 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hello ST. I saw your edit here and I wanted to let you know that whoever this person is they have been trying to create a page about themselves for several days now. Both the article and its corresponding talk page have been deleted more than once. I am not quite sure how "Vinay rathi" comes into it but the edit history here shows several page moves that become odder as they go on. It is late where I am and I can't figure our whether any of them need to be undone or not. Also they might be just as confusing for you but I did want to let you know about this in case you can figure out what is happening. Cheers and enjoy the rest of your week. MarnetteD|Talk 04:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, MarnetteD (and removing the reflist) as I first encountered this when it happened and I hope they simply learn what the features are actually for and capable of.

Have a good night's sleep as it's only 10:50PM where I am and still plan to be awake from some hours. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 04:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding of more sources

Hi, SwisterSister! Added more high qualiry reference citations to BitX which you rejected earlier (BBC, Economist and local Nigeria, Indonesian, South African and Malaysian news sources. Hit me up if you think more are needed?? Werneravr (talk) 12:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability: Should I change topics, or find more articles?

Hi SwisterTwister!

Thanks for looking at my article again! I'm glad it's improving. Are you saying that this business just inherently ins't notable enough? I've looked at the wiki CORP Notability guidelines, and it seems that all my third-party sources are more in-depth than generic announcements or reviews; many are news articles, and in-depth interviews. I believe Version One Ventures in notable because they have spurred the growth for so many companies! Not to mention the startup world is slowly growing in popularity and size. However, I may have to start with a different startup/venture capitalist if these sources aren't strong enough. I can't find any more!

Thanks in advance for your help and advice. Johnsonclaire770 (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article was rejected and Article having all the references

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you for your review. I added more references about Draft: Kundan Srivastava. Thanks! Syd4tech (talk) 06:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HI

Jeffrey H Song (talk) 06:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC) Hi David, Thank you for taking the time to review my created article Draft: Fast Future Brands. I have checked the submission’s references with notability at all. As you can see the references in my article, I am sure that is notability. Even though I tried to rectify the references a lot of times, there are declined with simple message “This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability” I would appreciate if you could give me some advice with more detailed information. Cheers.[reply]

Jeffrey H Song This simply still needs any more avaialble in-depth third-party sources overall to fully satisfy notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:29:51, 24 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Petecampbell88

Petecampbell88 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Wink Bingo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, my page for WinkBingo was refused on the grounds of notability. However, I feel it has been adequately sourced and is no more or less notable than many other pages already published. For example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/888casino. Could you please advise what else I can do to meet criteria. Many thanks Petecampbell88 (talk) 10:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Petecampbell88 It currenntly has several sources, yes, but I'm simply not sure if they are enough to fully satisfy notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Mhee Noi

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mhee Noi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The Nation article is enough for A7. Maybe not for GNG. Take to AfD if necessary. . Thank you. Ged UK 13:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Mxi Technologies

Hello SwisterTwister, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mxi Technologies, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ged UK 13:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to page your reviewed

Hi there, Thanks for reviewing the page I created on the NGO the UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition. You suggested that the article used to many primary sources - ie citiations to documents etc created by the organization its self. To remedy this I have added several citations to media articles about the organization and resubmitted it for aproval. Thanks PaperGoldFish (talk) 14:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PaperGoldFish There simply are not enough in-depth thid-party sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:08:47, 24 November 2015 review of submission by Jaymini.m

Jaymini.m (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Poq (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

I have added additional references in support of the article but my issue is most of the information I have found are from online news publications. Will this be a problem as the company I am writing about is 4 years old so there isn't any other referneces I can find at the moment, although I am still looking?

I have also corrected the references but for one that is missing the authors name, the article doesn't actually state the authors name, instead it only has the publications name in place of the author. Please let me know your thoughts.

Look forward to hearing your feedback.

Many thanks!

Jaymini.m Hello! There are several listed sources but all of them seem like trade publications and such, so I'm not sure how notable the article is, so the article could also use any more available major news publications such as news, magazine and journals. DGG Would you care to weigh here? SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21:22:01, 24 November 2015 review of submission by LoveLarry1234

LoveLarry1234 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Christopher Bevans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

Can you please elaborate on your comments for the ["Christopher Bevans"] draft? You mentioned "This is getting closer, but still needs any more available sources about him and his work overall"

are you able to refer to certain lines/paragraphs that need rewriting or different sourcing? Your insight is appreciated.

Thanks.

A beer for you!

Thanks for greetings! FanisWiki (talk) 21:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:44:34, 24 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mbabco

Mbabco (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Susan Seddon Boulet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I guess I need clarification about a couple points.

1) "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule."

I've referenced several sources that cite the artist as either a founder or an important member of the visionary art movement. I also reference 4 books dedicated completely to her art as well as a number of books that she has illustrated, including one by a well-known author, Ursula K. Le Guin. I would think any of these would mark her as worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia.

2) Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Every paragraph in the article has references that could be looked at to verify the information. What is wrong with the references I have used?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Mbabco (talk) 22:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mbabco The article is acceptable but for enhancement, it simply still needs any more available sources than the currently listed ten (10). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your prompt review and acceptance of my article! It is much appreciated MontagsOnFire (talk) 23:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gill Fielding - Notability

Good evening. I have now added a further five independent third-party references in support of the subject's notability. These all have the subject as their central subject. I will resubmit for review now. Many Thanks Neilho (talk) 01:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article review - Notability

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for your prompt review of my article. I have added an Awards section complete with references to attest to the notability of the subject. I hope this meets the guidelines! Many thanks Izbukvic (talk) 01:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 02:32:22, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Jbsfsax

Jbsfsax (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Arthur Kudner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My motivation of creating an article about Arthur Kudner stems from finding his famous words on "big words" first, and later discovering that he himself had not just been the author of a single famous phrase, but had a decisive role in the development of the American dream and the American Way of Life which has both impressed and been detested by Europeans before and after World War II. As it is my first article on a person, I did not notice any Wikiquette about that particular kind of Wikipedia articles.

Unfortunately, I do not have enough time to thoroughly research his life and dig out some more "citeable" references for the things I found out by simple searching the web for pieces on him. I choose an extract of information from these sources and composed them to an article covering the Person Arthur Kudner, both father and son. The father, son and the sons first wife were definitely persons of public interest at their time, by being close friends of Grace Kelly, and by leaving footprints first in America and later worldwide in the way advertisement and marketing were becoming an essential part of public life in modern western society.

My conception of Wikipedia was that articles would start even if they are not yet perfect, fragmentary and erroneous, as long as the focused item or, in my case, person was relevant to the public. After reading the guidelines on notability, it is clear to me that Arthur Kudner, both junior and senior, had been creative professionals which made significant contributions to the marketing and advertisement industries in the developing 20th century, insofar fulfilling the second additional criterion on notability, namely "originating a significant new concept, theory or technique". It should not matter that Kudner's contributions were not in the pure artistic domain. Some of his ad slogans have even become common language, this alone should suffice to prove notability.

But I understand that all this needs references to reliable secondary sources and I guess that the sources I added to the first version do not meet all the necessary standards for reliability. My hope was and still is that other Wikipedia authors would close this gap after reading about the article and the famous citation, which also has not been covered in the wikipedia so far. I hope I could persuade you and would suggest to let the article start this way and invite corrections and completions, as I have seen with several Wiki articles before. Jbsfsax (talk) 02:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jbsfsax (talk) 02:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:05:06, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Kannadacinema

Kannadacinema (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Vandana (Kannada actress) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

      I don't find resources other than what used in the article Vandana(Kannada actress). Because she is a veteran actress active in 1960s decade. After her last film no one knows what she is doing. But she was a good actress who did many memorable roles in as many as 20 films in Kannada during her career spanning 8 years. You can watch her films on youtube

1.Post Master https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR5I5WBX8mk 2.Bhagyada Bagilu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc-CncWDino 3.Chinnari Puttanna https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L21EMMGZ7Ic and many more famous films

 I think the resources that are provided in the article are more than enough to create an article on artist.
 In this link http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12536/sandalwood/rajesh-stunner-on-silver-screen-exclusives-details one of the legendary actor of Kannada Rajesh says 
  "In the 1950 onwards Honnappa Bhagavathar, Rajakumar, Udayakumar, Kalyankumar, Panthulu, Ashwath, Narasimha raju, Balakrishna, Iyer, B Saroja Devi, Leelavathi, Pandari Bai, MV Rajamma, Mynavathi, "Vandhana", Kalpana, Jayanthi, Bharathi enriched the film industry."

  The Chiloka.com has created her profile (http://chiloka.com/celebrity/vandana) which will give the detailed filmography of her.
I don't why you are stopping this article from creating.  My intention is to respect this forgotten artist. If you are still not convinced and sticking to rules and regulations its ok.

Thank You!

Kannadacinema (talk) 05:05, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kannadacinema The article simply needs any more available sources for solid weight and depth. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:19:38, 25 November 2015 review of submission by 216.19.179.102

216.19.179.102 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Alexander Shorokhoff (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, thanks for re-reviewing. Please let me know specifically how many references are enough. The number of references seems to be excess of those provided for other watchmaker articles, as is the overall quality (3 of them are national newspapers). 216.19.179.102 (talk) 06:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

216.19.179.102 Simply however many there are that are in-depth and third-party. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:29:07, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Nittennair

Nittennair (talk · contribs)
- Draft:MuchTV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Resubmitted Article for muchTV

Hi David, Thank you very much for the help so far. I have added more references (This time from print media). Hopefully this will be enough for it to get approved.

Thank you once again.Nittennair (talk) 06:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Nittennair (talk) 06:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article Draft: Donati Salla Resubmitted by Abdulrahman1985

Dear David! Kindly receive a note of thanks from me due to the good job that you have done on my page particularly critiquing accordingly so that the article may become a notable one. So far I have edits on the article Draft:Donati Salla particularly in improving a sense of political figure in subject to politicians notability guidelines. Therefore kindly review the article and give me a feedback as well. Regards Abdulrahman1985 Thank you. --User:Abdulrahman1985 —Preceding undated comment added 06:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to comment on Draft:Jeremiah Texts from Qumran

Azureindignation (talk · contribs)

Hi SwisterTwister! Thanks for the comment on the draft.

I'm wondering if changing the draft to "Biblical Jeremiah Texts from Qumran" would be reasonable. In another conversation, I was informed that some of the Pseudo-Jeremiah texts were found on other Wikipedia pages, but I have seen a lack of representation of the Biblical Jeremiah scrolls found in other places on Wikipedia including the Letter of Jeremiah page, the Dead Sea Scrolls page, and the List of the Dead Sea Scrolls specifically in regards to Cave 4. If I focused more on the Biblical side of the Jeremiah Qumran texts, would that qualify as notable?

Thanks for the help. Azureindignation (talk) 07:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever makes the article seem like it's solidly notable and satisfying general notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article Draft: Jio Chat Resubmitted by Tejas Nair

Dear SwisterTwister, thanks for pointing out the scarcity of third-party sources. The draft now has a total of 20 citations of which some are in-depth about the topic. Please have a look if possible, and advice. Thanks Tejas Nair (talk) 07:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:29:01, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Keepsharingknowledge

Keepsharingknowledge (talk · contribs)
- Draft:West Suffolk Swimming Club (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

   I could do with some advice as the additional information required to have this page approved. You will have read the club has had world class swimmers train here with references backed up by external independent articles and other wiki pages. During my research i've found other swim clubs wiki pages with less heritage.
   As this is my first page I do require some specific guide nice

Thank you Andrew

Keepsharingknowledge (talk) 07:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keepsharingknowledge The amount of sourcing is acceptable but most of the sources seem focused with the past members of the club, rather than specific coverage about the club itself (the club needs to be independently notable for a solid separate article). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you. Will dig somemore! :) Probenciano (talk) 08:26, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

09:24:37, 25 November 2015 review of submission by Baron667

Baron667 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mark Clarke (Politician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for taking the time to review my article and for tidying it for me - my first wikiarticle so I've been on the help page to try and improve it a bit.

I got what you said about notability - yes, he hasn't held a position of office which would seem to be the requirement for notable politicians. I think therefore its fair to say I've probably mislabeled him. Should it say "Mark Clarke (Political Activist)" instead?

I have improved some of the sources, removed the weaker ones like Brietbart and replaced them with stronger ones, such as the BBC. I have removed the articles as the wiki helpers told me that it looked like CITEKILL and I was trying to hard to prove his notability. In fact I wasn't trying to do that, I was being careful to use a lot of sources because many of the newspaper articles about Clarke seem to be allegations at the moment, so I wanted to be sure it was clear it wasn't Wikipedia making the allegations. Even so - where one good source is necessary Ive kept it that way.

Also I have added a section where BBC Newsnight did a special feature on him this month, and also added a documentary about him which aired in 2007.

Can you suggest anything else to help me improve the article so it passes the notability guidelines? I've added lead articles and front page stories in the reference section with major newspapers - that might prove his notoriety but not sure about his notability.

Baron667 (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there David. Any update on approving this? You may have read that the UK International Decelopment Minister has resigned over this scandal now and its possible the Chairman of the Conservative Party in the UK will do as well - I will add this to the article. However what about changing it from (Politician) to (Political Activist)? Seems that would surmount the issue of having to be elected or hold office to assume notability. Baron667 (talk) 06:39, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Baron667 (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David

Have I met the requirements yet for this? Your two issues with it were:

notability: I have elaborated more, including documentary episodes on BBC on him, or special features, on national flagship shows: 3 in total (Newsnight x2 and BBC Radio 4), I have also elaborated more on his key involvement in the resignation of a uk government minister. If you can remove the politician handle then does this prove notability?

citations: I have furnished the article with many sources from UK's most respected newspapers and media outlets, including: BBC News, BBC Radio 4, BBC Newsnight, The Telegraph, The Times, The Guardian, THe Financial Times, The Independent, (Basically all the Broadsheets) and also the most widely read newspapers in the UK - Daily Mail, The Sun, The Mirror, and London's most listened to radio show LBC.

THe man is at the centre of the tatler tory scandal; he is at the centre of an investigation which has brought down a government minister, looks to bring down the Party Chairman, he's associated with the Prime Minister, national conferences have been cancelled, the entire executive of COnservative Party youth wing has been suspended; its been some of the biggest news in the UK over the last 3 months and an activist has even committed suicide over the scandal. MPs have allegedly been blackmailed. Is there anything else I can do to prove notability? If so please let me know David.

Thanks

Baron667 (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

09:27:34, 25 November 2015 review of submission by PalettePic

PalettePic (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Palette Pictures (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

First of all, thank you for taking your time revising my article.

However, I would like your help clarifying your comment about my submission, when you said "Simply not enough in-depth third-party sources overall".

In my view, I have backed every statement in that article with evidence, and the work presented there is notable (again, it's the first co-production show in a 1-billion-habitants country).

So, what else could I do to fix this article? What kind of information is missing?

Thank you, G

Request on 16:35:43, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by KarenFLI

KarenFLI (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Robert Rosenthal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. Thank you for reviewing my article about Robert Rosenthal. I am hoping you can help me understand what lead you to determine that he is not notable so that I can adjust the article appropriately. He is the CEO of a company he founded at a time when there were not many companies providing wealth management, he lead the IPO of a major corporations (Entenmann's), serves in leadership roles of a major university, Hofstra, a major health system, North Shore-Long Island Jewish, and at one time was an owner of the NY Islanders. Each of these are referenced with either article citations or website references. Please let me know what I can do to improve this article. Thanks! KarenFLI

KarenFLI (talk) 16:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: TECTERRA Draft

Hi there,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:TECTERRA

On November 8 you indicated that there needs to be more available sources on the work that this organization does. What can I do to make this page better?

Nxucgy (talk) 16:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COSMINA ENE Draft

Hello, Thank you for taking the time to review my submission for Cosmina Ene. I added several more references I found about this artist. She is a French artist and a lot of information published about her is in French, but I have been able to translate the articles. I have used both the guidelines for reliable sources and notability, as you suggested and I feel I have provided many sufficient sources to determine the subject's notability. Further direction is much appreciated. Thank you ! Hellosink (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)Amber - HelloSink[reply]

Football articles

Thanks, I'll take a look! Giant Snowman 18:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:19:21, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mkatz44

Mkatz44 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Dinitia Smith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

What sort of sources are you looking for? Nearly all the information is sourced online; everything else came from the primary source herself, Dinitia Smith—I am her assistant but she wrote the copy herself. Much of her work is pre-Internet. How can we expedite this? Mkatz44 (talk) 18:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:55:15, 25 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Dsalazar6

Dsalazar6 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sexism in tabletop gaming (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Let me just say thanks for being so helpful with my article. I can accept that it needs work, and when I have more free time I want to try and verify some of those specific examples. I would however like it if you could give me any pointers about finding reports regarding harassment, as I had trouble finding many that weren't just mere anecdote. Do you have any tips for searching for news reports and other proper accounts? It's honestly been the hardest part of my research and I definitely needs some pointers. Any help you can provide is much appreciated.

Dsalazar6 (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Dsalazar6 (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DeafVideo.tv added more third party sources

Hi SwisterTwister, you've given me feedback on a draft page I'm working on. I've went in and added more third party references. How many are needed to make a page? I think I've found about as many as I'm going to find for a subculture like deafness. If the page is not now adequate then how can I delete the draft page? Feel free to do that for me if you don't think the page is now worthy of wikipedia. I've given it all I have. I do think this is an interesting topic that people who are interested in learning about ASL or Deaf culture should know about. It is a Deaf space that propogates the spread and influence of Deaf culture in the internet age. Thanks for considering my page and for the help making it possible. Djgriffin7 (talk) 05:44, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Intel Anti-Theft

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for taking the time to review this! Quite embarrassingly in my 7 years here I've only created 2 articles, so I'm trying to force myself to learn a little more about it. I'm pretty sure this could be notable as it was in the news for being cracked a couple of years ago, and Intel were the first to develop a hard/soft -ware suite such as this. I'll keep going forward and add some more content and references -- samtar ^whisper 06:52, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Took over Don Joint article

Hi SwisterTwister! I took over the Don Joint article after an IRL conversation with myrnaj about creating it. You had previously commented on it at [[22]], saying"This is good and I'm willing to accept but the article could use some more sources if available. SwisterTwister talk 17:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)". I've rewritten it and added further citations. Please feel free to review it as published and give me any notes. Thanks! Heyneff (talk) 07:03, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:15:29, 26 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by HastingsBella

HastingsBella (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mads Munk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Editor - Thanks for you review - please can you let us know why this piece has been rejected - we have four + independent editorial sources - all major reputable magazines and/or newspapers, all with interviews and/or major feature length coverage: Wallpaper, Square Mile, Financial Times and Scandinavian Traveller - plus quotes from Ad Week and various listings on third party websites includingIMDb - the last reviewer said we needed another editorial source - which we have now supplied (Square Mile interview) We believe we now have more than three independent editorial sources for this article - and enough to make this notable. Please could you tell me why this was rejected so we can rectify this as we are really at a loss to know what else to do here? Many thanks. HastingsBella.

HastingsBella (talk) 10:15, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Badsha

Hi SwisterTwister. I removed your speedy deletion tag from Omar Badsha because I thought I could improve it. I have removed the puffery and promotional tone and added some references. I don't think it meets the criteria for G11 now but if you still think TNT applies then feel free to nominate it for deletion. Sarah-Jane (talk) 11:27, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

politician notability criteria; unsure?

It really baffles me as to, how is it that you have chosen to reject my contribution by actually stating that, you are not sure whether 'it does or does not' fit the politician notability criteria! Being unsure does not give you that privilege for the encyclopedia is not meant for you alone. Some of the sources are certainly curated by me over the web and it is but obvious that one would notice that I have a verbatim surname to the one relating to the politician I am attempting to insert into the encyclopedia. Moreover, has it ever occurred to you that some vernacular sources from yore, although legitimately recorded on other mediums may have not yet been brought online? Moreover, it is for a certain that 'mmsajjan' was a bona fide elected representative representing a constituency of 2,00,000 voters even though most of them may not even be aware of 'wikipedia'! And this does fit the notability because pictures do not lie and do take note of the photograph therein of said politician greeting the most fiery Prime Minister of India; no less! Shivsajjan (talk) 21:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:20:25, 26 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mohd Sarim Ashrafi

Mohd Sarim Ashrafi (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Cultural Education Centre, AMU Aligarh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Draft:Cultural Education Centre, AMU Aligarh is a notable institute but i dont have much references to cite them. Tell me how can i make it better??

Mohd Sarim Ashrafi (talk) 13:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Society for Nutrition Education

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Society for Nutrition Education, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It's not that spammy really. That being said, I'm not sure it's notable either, so might be worth taking to AfD. Thank you. Ged UK 13:44, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Humphries

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you for reviewing my entry https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tony_Humphries_(musician)

I'm just starting out on Wikipedia and have some questions. This entry has since been flagged as requiring further citations.

I have read through your help page on citations but require more specific information. I'm unsure as to which statements need specific citations to improve the entry. Or is it perhaps that the sources themselves are fine but I've formatted them incorrectly.

Would appreciate your assistance and insight in order to get the article fully compliant with community standards.

Ppicker (talk) 15:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Thomas J. Carroll

Hi SwisterTwister,

  You declined my entry on Father Thomas Carroll. Draft:Thomas J. Carroll It's only my second article so please help point me in the right direction.  Apparently the primary problem is that the citations don't make it clear that the subject is notable.  On my first entry I ran into the problem of "peacock" and "puffery" so I went out of my way to avoid superlatives and the like. I've added additional citations and some new material to help make it clear.  Please take another look and give me some guidance on how to improve this. He really was a pioneer and a leading figure in the field of training people who became blind as adults.

thanks! RobSVA (talk) 19:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21:07:30, 26 November 2015 review of submission by Costanzaucd

Costanzaucd (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Frank Moss (labour leader) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

can I know specifically what i can do to improve it? thank you

Women in punk rock

Thank you for accepting my article for creation on Women in punk rock. I'll continue to work on it to improve it from start class. If you have have the time, I'd love to hear suggestions - especially for organizing the article.Netherzone (talk) 22:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23:24:15, 26 November 2015 review of submission by Caramelcarmela

Caramelcarmela (talk · contribs)
- User:Caramelcarmela/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am trying to submit a wiki article for my band Caramel Carmela. I don't understand why I can't use the description I have provided. As I stated, all of the band's information submitted are my own words. Our bio is the same on each web page, because use the same bio for all of our artist submission forms. I assure you nobody is going to ask for the information to be taken down. The only person who could possibly do that would be me.

Best regards, Sha Gipson Caramel Carmela

11:53:43, 27 November 2015 review of submission by Sjscott80

Sjscott80 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Logz.io (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! After further review, you said that the draft page Logz.io looked good and asked if I could add more sources. I added more sources a few weeks ago. So, could you let me know the status of the draft whenever you have a chance? :)

Sjscott80 (talk) 11:53, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:29:43, 27 November 2015 review of submission by CLynnC2015

CLynnC2015 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lori G. Beaman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Reviewer-

Could you give me more specifics about adding third party sources? Would direct links to all Journal articles, books, (publishers), ISBN numbers, etc. satisfy this? Could you provide me an example of what you are looking for?

Thank you.

Hello SwisterTwister, thank You for reviewing my article! Unfortunately it has been deleted. Is it possible to get it back as draft? I could not found how... I realy tried. I wish to follow Your suggestion and complete it with the third-part refereces (which are many too...) May I ask You to review my article once more then?

Thank You and best regards, Natasha Natashakhardina (talk) 23:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You unreviewed a page I curated

fcaram Hello there, you most recently left me this message:

Hi, I'm SwisterTwister. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, User:Lynnlindahl/sandbox, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 19:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

I was wondering why you might've unreviewed this page. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 02:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I hadn't noticed that Skyllfully and wasn't aware it had been reviewed. To be honest, about everyone who reviews pages gets one and I sure have so it's not to be taken seriously sometimes as two people may have clicked "review" without knowing.

SwisterTwister talk 02:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem, thanks for the explanation. It seemed kinda odd. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 15:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03:58:46, 28 November 2015 review of submission by Reenun

Reenun (talk · contribs)
- User:Reenun/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I want to ask David, the random patroller - When all the sources mentioned are of leading newspapers and agencies why more references are needed. The article is of interest because it talks about public speaking on Indian culture and Yoga represented at places of repute - University of Oxford, California, International Association of Yoga Therapists by DR. Radhika Nagrath. Also she has been the guest of honour to the government institutions like Consul General of India to Dubai. Reenun (talk) 03:58, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reenun First, please see Referencing for beginners to learn how to better format the listed sources and, second, the listed sources are simply not enough for the notability guidelines listed with my comment. All your claims and information may be accurate but it simply needs more sources overall. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 04:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: OWASP

Hello — I'm just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of OWASP, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. There are definitely issues with the article, however, including a serious lack of third party sources. Let me know if you have any questions. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 04:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With reference to the submitted article 'Adi Dharam' reviewed by you

Hi, As per your instructions I have added a few more references to the article on Adi Dharam (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Adi_Dharam). However, I had resubmitted the article after doing so, but this another reviewer rejected the submission saying that the article is already present on Wikipedia, which is not true. I wrote to him validating my point but till now I have not received any reply from him nor am I expecting one soon. Kindly help me out otherwise I have again to resubmit it and again agonizingly wait for another month for approval.

Thanks

Gimunda (talk) 10:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Adesua Etomi

Hi, As regards the article i submitted and your comment - Draft: Adesua Etomi The person in question is an actor not a musician. Thanks Msjazzyfed (talk) 17:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lilongwe Wildlife Trust

You just beat me tagging that page. It also has some copvio or close paraphrasing of http://www.lilongwewildlife.org/programmes/rescue-rehabilitation/lilongwe-wildlife-centre/ aee this Google search. 220 of ^Borg 06:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah haha 220 of Borg, I've actually been searching some random older articles and deleting the most obvious ones when I thought I would scan NPP as always. As someone who cares very much about conservation, environment and wildlife, it's unfortunate to delete but as mentioned with my edit summary, I simply found nothing better than some passing News mentions so it's a WP:TNT at best. Cheers,

SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My oswald article

just noticed your comments re reasons for declining. I understand from chat on the ships page that any warship over 100 tons is considered notable and I would point out that Oswalds five sister ships already have their own page Lyndaship (talk) 17:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PubNub article review follow up

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for taking the time to review PubNub on November 14, 2015!

I've added few dozen secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject and improved the PubNub submission's referencing. Anxiously waiting for a follow up review that the information is now verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the PubNub subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Thanks for considering PubNub article and for the help making it possible.

Yigal59 (talk) 19:48, November 29, 2015 (UTC)

Submission declined followup

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for reviewing my article on Christopher Anselmo!

I completely understand your reason behind the comment. What can I do to fix the problem? I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, so perhaps it was the way I inserted my references? (I believe there are enough credible third-party sources to support the notability guidelines, but there might easily be a more effective way to reference them). If not, what other sorts of sources do you suggest adding? Your help is much appreciated.

Thank you in advance for your assistance in bringing my article to life! --Adenburg (talk) 05:45, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adenburg Simply add any more available in-depth third-party sources overall to that it fully satisfies the listed notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've got an idea of where I need to go! But just so we're on the same page... Thinking that would involve, say, for the "Involvement at Northwestern" section: finding press releases for the various shows he's written and directed, and not quoting from his website or LinkedIn. Would that be enough, or should I go further (and if so, how much further would I have to go)? Thank you once again. --Adenburg (talk) 05:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adenburg Well to be honest press releases aren't always used unless they are the only available sources as they often simply published material by the entity (or entities) themselves so third-party sources (such as news, journals, magazines, etc.) are often used instead. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see! Quite a few of my sources are from various newspapers, both regional and college-based, and some electronic (see Broadwayworld.com, though a more widely used website for theatrical/Broadway-related news is Playbill.com, where I just found a source relating to my article). I'll try and find some more newspapers and interviews and will attempt to phase out all the "entity-published" references; will resubmit my article within the next couple of days. Thank you! --Adenburg (talk) 06:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07:31:09, 30 November 2015 review of submission by Anatha Gulati

Anatha Gulati (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Subrat Sahoo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Anatha Gulati (talk) 07:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC) I have added references in my article but as per reviewer that is not enough. So I want to know which type of third party references consider in my case. I have given news references but my draft was declined. I have also read the section of references for newbie and notability but I can't understand So please help me in my case.[reply]

Anatha Gulati (talk) 07:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)After that how to move my draft article to the main space of Wikipedia? or it will move automatically after approval of reviewer. So also help me in this case.[reply]

Anatha Gulati The article has information and sources which is a start but needs more to at least satisfy biographies notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Battle of Karbala#RFC for notability

Hi DGG, Can you please participate in this RFC and tell us your idea about the notability of some articles. Regards.--Seyyed(t-c) 07:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually not DGG, I'm SwisterTwister

, but frankly I would say some of them seem notable especially with the likelihood of archived sources so I'll comment there. Cheers, Sa.vakilian SwisterTwister talk 08:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I wrote the massage first for DGG and then copied it here. :-)--Seyyed(t-c) 08:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sa.vakilian It's natural and my name is David but not "GG", haha.

SwisterTwister talk 08:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12:26:07, 30 November 2015 review of submission by Spwbarton

Spwbarton (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Invest Europe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am keen to understand more clearly why the sources provided to show Invest Europe's notability are not sufficient, and what type of further article / link I could provide to allow the page to be published. Invest Europe is the European equivalent of the National Venture Capital Association in the United States, which seems to have little information to support its notability: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Venture_Capital_Association In the past week Invest Europe research has been referenced in the Financial Times - http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3a7d4ebe-78a4-11e5-a95a-27d368e1ddf7.html#axzz3sxtGHVMl In addition, an update to its professional standards, which acts as a code of conduct for the private equity and venture capital industry in Europe, has been reported widely in the European financial media (eg - Financial News - http://www.efinancialnews.com/story/2015-11-24/invest-europe-transparency-guidelines ) Would those additions help? Thank you,

Looking in, the Financial Times article is a mere mention in an article about a person unnconnected with the company. The Financial News article does show what you say, and if added to the article I'd accept it. DGG ( talk ) 19:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: RM Education

Hello SwisterTwister. Your proposal for speedy deletion of RM Education was declined on the grounds that RM is probably one of the largest educational IT providers in the UK, providing pretty much all of the broadband infrastructure for UK schools as well as email, software etc. Its notability can be confirmed by searching using its former name of Research Machines. The company is very significant in its own market - IT services for schools, colleges and universities - and was for many years the strongest competitor of Acorn Computers, until Acorn folded Guffydrawers (talk) 12:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:05:55, 30 November 2015 review of submission by 96.28.44.118

96.28.44.118 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Miratech (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

SwisterTwister: please review the edits I have made re. Miratech Group. The information stated herein is factual, and I have taken great pains to provide, in reference to your editorial comments, numerous independent, external references; I also have taken the step to provide, from those independent external references, the information they have given to Miratech supporting why Miratech is notable. This is the third time our submission has been declined, and we're getting quite frustrated. I would appreciate any further inputs should the submission this time not be satisfactory, and we appreciate your help in getting this information about Miratech on Wikipedia. It's all factual; it's all out there for public consumption, and the company deserves a place in Wikipedia - which I use constantly, btw, in my daily work and personal life.

Thank you. Happy Holidays. Kind regards, Lara

16:30:00, 30 November 2015 review of submission by Galitwolf

Galitwolf (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Tamar Eisenman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for your review! This is my first wiki page I am editing. I looked over your remarks. As you mentioned there wasn't enough in-depth third-party sources so I have added 18 new third party sources to the References subject.

I wanted to make sure I am in the right direction before saving my edit again for review.

Thank you so much, Galitwolf

Request on 16:38:37, 30 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Inga1976

Inga1976 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ardo Ran Varres (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. I was asked to create an article on composer Ardo Varres for the Estonian Vikipeedia and subsequently to create a page in the English Wikipedia. The article in Estonian has been up for a while but my attempts to post the English version have been denied many times already, despite my efforts to create the footnotes and references in the correct format, still the answer has been that the notoriety standard is not met. What am I to do? Thank you. Helen

Inga1976 (talk) 16:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:29:38, 30 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by 184.147.121.46

184.147.121.46 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Wilhelm Neumann-Torborg' (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, thanks for reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Wilhelm_Neumann-Torborg'. The German references do refer to him as a "well-known" sculptor, and if you look at the references you can see he is included in reference works about artists as well as in recent newspaper articles and scholarly papers. How would I assert this in the article itself to show you that this is a notable person? Thanks for your advice.184.147.121.46 (talk) 20:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC) 184.147.121.46 (talk) 20:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Thank you for the reply. I'm glad it passes the notability hurdle.

Re your request for "simply" more sources and more information, I'm a bit baffled how to fulfill this request.

Re sources, how many more does it need? At some point in the creation process, there was an auto-generated list called "Find sources for Wilhelm Neumann-Torborg" or similar. I promise I clicked on every link (except JSTOR, because I don't have a subscription) and put everything I found in the article.

Also, what do you mean by more information? Is there a minimum length I need to reach? One of the sources that I could access has a long description of how he was hired to make the Elberfelder Poor Relief Momument but I thought that was a bit too fine detail for an encyclopedia article. But I could add another sentence there and pad it out a bit.

Thanks again for your help!184.147.121.46 (talk) 21:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've added two more references, so it now has nine.184.147.121.46 (talk) 14:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:35:18, 1 December 2015 review of submission by Jing jsb

Jing jsb (talk · contribs)
- Draft:DigiPas USA LLC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, we tried to put in as many 3rd-party sources as we can, but we are not sure if we are doing the right thing. Can you tell us which parts do not fulfil the notability guidelines?

06:03:20, 1 December 2015 review of submission by Sunil~mlwiki

Sunil~mlwiki (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kalamandalam Gangadharan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

For notability I have provided Indian National Award link and a printed encyclopedia link with page number along with other two books in citation. Also provided the newspaper links Can u please suggest me what you want more? Regards,

Request on 08:30:32, 1 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Ybanezedward

Ybanezedward (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lindsay De Vera (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I saw you reviewing my article and I'm really having a hard time reaching your standards of notability. I knew some of her TV commercials, print ads and modeling career, if I can provide the info on list format with the links (like YouTube) provided in reference section, will it count as notability? I made some little changes on your previous review as of 20:37, 30 November 2015‎, please check it out if you have time. Thanks

What has to be included for third party sources in a draft

Dear SwisterTwister,

Draft link : -  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:IJSRD&redirect=no

I got following comment for declination of my draft on IJSRD "Comment: Simply needs in-depth third-party sources overall to at least satisfy journals notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:42, 1 December 2015 (UTC)"

Which third party sources should I include to satisfy the journals notability. As it is e-journal and working with academic Publishing. Please tell the third party sources names so we can include it. Also tell which references should be included. As we have included the external links giving notability of this Journal.

Please reply. IJSRD Editor (talk) 08:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)--IJSRD Editor (talk) 08:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @ISJRD Editor: Please read and understand WP:42, and recognise that the absence of sources meeting these simple but stern criteria mean that it is very unlikely that your journal, of which you seem to be the paid editor, is going to be accepted as an article. Please read WP:BURDEN. We will advise you, but we are very unlikely to find the sources for you. Fiddle Faddle 10:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:06:53, 1 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Chis Maxwell

Chis Maxwell (talk · contribs)
- Draft:James Chisholm (Senior) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The reviewer has rejected my article on James Chisholm (Senior) based on a lack of notability ["While most historical subjects are accepted, I'm simply not seeing the solid notability here"], suggesting the addition of more secondary sources and improvement of referencing. I have currently included some 40 primary sources in this article. With very few exceptions, the only major second source is the biography of the man's life that has just been published (The Merchant of Sydney). At the launch of this book last Saturday, Emeritus Professor Brian Fletcher, one of Australia's most distinguished historians of early colonial history, said it was extraordinary that such a prominent colonial identity had, to date, "slipped through the historian's net" and had "been sorely neglected for some two centuries". As Professor Fletcher says, James Chisholm has been largely ignored for more than 200 years, and yet he was the equal of many who already feature strongly in the articles of Wikipedia, and certainly exceeds many others in notability. He was a major early entrepreneur and merchant; responsible. possibly only secondary to Robert Campbell, for opening up significant trade with Bengal; he owned a large area of the early town of Sydney; he was selected by Governor Macquarie as a member of his Governor's Court; he owned the first Bank of New South Wales of which he was a founding shareholder and Director; and he was widely acclaimed as one of Sydney's most respected early citizens. He has been neglected by history because he was a modest man who did not promote himself. I have tried to avoid rhetoric and stuck to the facts. I am able to add many more primary sources to this article, if this is required. However, the only other secondary sources that mention him are already cited. Can you please advise on how I should proceed? With thanks Chis Maxwell Chis Maxwell (talk) 11:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:28:36, 1 December 2015 review of submission by Pracbrown

Pracbrown (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Instant Hedge (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am thinking whether my article on Instant Hedge would be better placed as a sub-section within the already existing Hedge (Hedgerow) definition. Your thoughts are welcome!

Dharmakeerthi Sri Ranjan

Hi. I've declined your U5 as it is in article space. However, I've prodded it. Thinking on, it might be worth an A7 as it tells us sweet FA about the man himself. A prod 2 would be welcome (to me, not the author...). Peridon (talk) 11:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

All I did was move the draft to draftspace. You don't leave the rejection message for me. I'm an admin, I know how to write articles without using draftspace. DS (talk) 12:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DragonflySixtyseven: The message that you received was automatically produced by the articles for creation helper script. Unfortunately, it's not an uncommon occurrence for the script to get confused and recognize the wrong person as the page-creator, and because you moved the page it seemed to think that you created the draft. I'm sure no offense was intended, just a flaw in a program. Kharkiv07 (T) 13:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

DragonflySixtyseven Yes, to be honest, AfC will not always let you know who it sends it to, and if you've noticed, I review several. For example, I've often resubmitted a draft for the user and I'll get the message.

SwisterTwister talk 18:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:13:39, 1 December 2015 review of submission by Blockergroup

Blockergroup (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Penny Drue Baird (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Good morning, based on your feedback as to why my article was declined, I increased the amount of verifiable references/citations for the Penny Drue Baird page. I have resubmitted a re-view and wanted to confirm this is what you need to accept the page for Penny Drue Baird.

==Ronnie Apteker

Hi SisterTwister Re your review of my page, I take your comments on board and hope to be able to provide a solution myself. But I feel bound to say, that a lack of consistency over how criteria are applied is one of the most confusing and maddening things about contributing to Wikipedia. I found it easier doing my university thesis! Take a look at David Frankel (entrepreneur) who was Ronnie Apteker's business partner. It reads like the dullest of CVs, largely written by David Frankel himself if the View History is anything to go by. So could your explain how he is able to get away with that, whereas Ronnie Apteker deserves recognition if only for his contribution to cinema. Doesn't Wiki say that films, books, music are evidence in themselves?

It seems a self-evident that unless criteria are applied equally, then the system must be flawed and consequently in danger of losing credibility Picknick99 (talk) 16:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article Resubmission (Tup Tup Palace)

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for reviewing my draft article and for your feedback (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Tup_Tup_Palace&redirect=no). I have added more in-depth third-party sources and made some amendments to the structure and content of the article.

In terms of depth of coverage, Tup Tup Palace has been the subject of verifiable significant coverage in many reliable, independent secondary sources spanning a period of some 8 years. There is no shortage of verifiable, objective evidence that it has attracted significant attention from numerous independent sources. The article now has 54 citations in total, of which approximately 1/3 constitute ‘significant’ coverage as opposed to ‘trivial / incidental’. I am aware that the trivial / incidental sources are not, in themselves, an argument for notability, but I feel that such citations can still provide useful background for the article as a whole, which I have tried to make as comprehensive as possible.

I feel that the audience of the sources is also relevant here; the coverage is not only limited to local news but features national and even some international coverage.

It is also my opinion that this venue has had a significant and demonstrable effect on Newcastle’s nightlife culture and national profile as a glamorous location. I say this because celebrities were simply not seen out in the city prior to it’s opening (a cursory internet search reveals this). The inference being that Newcastle as a city did not have a bar / nightclub of sufficient calibre to attract such celebrities.

I hope you agree there are now enough sources cited to demonstrate that the subject is genuinely notable, but I will of course take your guidance on that or any other improvements that you feel I could make. Laurahartley (talk) 17:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should I resubmit article

Hello sir, I need your help about this article, should I resubmit it or not yet ? are the non-English sources are not acceptable ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Oussama_Belhcen

Belisa Vranich Draft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Belisa_Vranich

Hi SwisterTwister, I'm confused by the repeated rejections – Vranich's class has been covered independently numerous times (well referenced by significant coverage in multiple secondary sources), she's a major media expert, she's been published by Wiley and Rayo, and is a leader in her field, which is a scientific one. What is lacking? Details on the individual breathing techniques themselves? ~ [Daveswallace] (talk) 20:28, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Monica Byrne

Hi SwisterTwister, I just resubmitted the article for review. I added more references, and also expanded on her work as playwright and non-fiction author. Is this now enough to support notability? If not, I would be grateful for suggestions. This is my first article from scratch, up to now I only edited and translated existing articles, so thanks for any help. Oefe (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

never mind, article has been accepted. Thanks anyway Oefe (talk) 21:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MassCEC article submission

Hi Sister Twister,

Thanks for your feedback. I want to let you know I spent a lot of time searching for sources outside of MassCEC, and was only able to find independent information primarily through the legislation that led to its inception, and content that partners and affiliated groups had put out. I used the NYSERDA, New York State Energy Research Development Authority, as a commensurate article and noticed they have similar sources and style of writing. While I can see why it appears to be written as an advertisement, this is what the organization does, as reported by them and every third party resource I could find.

Please let me know your thoughts on this and maybe provide a specific example of how I could fix it. Please feel free to edit yourself, as MassCEC has national and international recognition and certainly deserves an article. Side note, should it matter that MassCEC expressed opposition to a Wikipedia publication on them? Also something to consider.

Thank you for your time.

Alex Alsenal (talk) 22:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PubNub article declined follow up

Hi SwisterTwister,

I'm checking again on our PubNub article submission which was declined 16 days ago.

I've added since few dozen secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject and I improved the PubNub submission's referencing. I'm anxiously waiting for a follow up review to confirm that the information is now verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the PubNub subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia.

I'm grateful for your help in considering the PubNub article for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Yigal59 (talk) 23:10, December 1, 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 December 1#Opal Tometi

Your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opal Tometi was taken by 98.190.145.152 (talk · contribs) to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 December 1#Opal Tometi. Cunard (talk) 05:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Lawrence Byrd - Added Sources as per your suggestion

Hello! Thank you for your tips on improving the article on Lawrence Byrd. I have added a lot more sources, all from credible places. I have also included links to several books and papers that he was mentioned in. Do you think it needs anything else? Thank you so much for your time. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Lawrence_Byrd&redirect=no

Bridges Ventures

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thanks for your help. My page is still being rejected unfortunately, even though it has citations from respectable sources (Published non-fiction, government reports, UK Cabinet Office website, The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The Guardian, The Wharton School of Business (U.Penn), Businesweek - none of which publish anything other than their own opinion), plus many more. Do I need to add more?

Re the topic of my post not being notable, I am not sure why this is being cited as a reason for the post being rejected - Wikipedia has itself created a Category called 'Private equity firms of the United Kingdom', which has over 50 posts listed under it (many of which have 0 references), so this topic is notable by Wikipedia's own standards.

Would it help if I deleted some of the text from the post?

Cheers Aung2015

Aung2015 (talk) 15:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Aung2015 (talk) 15:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister,

I’d love to appeal for the Bridges Ventures post. I believe this post is a notable for the following reasons:

The organisation has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the firm (Times, Telegraph, Guardian, the UK Government, published non-fiction) – “Evidence of significant coverage by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability.”

Bridges plays a large role in the growth of the impact investment sector in the UK, in terms of both practice and research. Sustainable and impact investing is a growing financial sector which combines philanthropy and private equity. We are also at the forefront of the growth of sector in Latin America.

Bridges is an educational provider, the first in the world to offer global sustainable and impact investing training, in partnership with an American ivy league.

Are all of these reason not enough??

Thanks for all your help on this

Aung2015 (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister - hope you've had/are having a good holiday!! Just wanted to check up if the above made any sense/was possible? Thank you!

Aung2015 (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:30:09, 2 December 2015 review of submission by 69.200.224.107

69.200.224.107 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Michael Sweet (Photographer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Page is now updated with many additional third-party sources from credible publishers like The Village Voice, Leica Camera, Hyperallergic, Out Magazine, etc. Page matches photographer pages of his contemporaries such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siegfried_Hansen_%28photographer%29

articles added showing coverage of his work in various countries and languages Italy, France, Germany.

What specifically is still lacking to establish credibility as a photographer?

00:23:02, 3 December 2015 review of submission by Polentarion

Polentarion (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Andreas Anton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, you gave me some good advice and I made changes accordingly. Think the article is now good to go. Regards. Polentarion Talk 00:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you did reject the submission once, but you have not reacted since. I am not sure how to react. Polentarion Talk 16:47, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:07:04, 3 December 2015 review of submission by Kiaora1980

Kiaora1980 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Hernán Jiménez (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister -- Thank you for your review. I'm wondering why my submission was declined. Hernán Jiménez is one of the most notable Costa Rican entertainers, and all my references come from La Nación, which is Costa Rica's leading, most important and respectable newspaper. Could you please tell me how to improve the article in order to have it approved?

Many thanks! Kiaora1980

He may well-known locally but for a universal article here, it will need any more available information and sources for solid notability. Cheers Kiaora1980, SwisterTwister talk 01:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:59:11, 3 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Cmacsound

Cmacsound (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Curtis Macdonald (saxophonist) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your review. My article draft is also meant to help disambiguate between two artists of the same name—see Curtis Macdonald. In addition to referencing more verifiable 3rd party sources, is there anything else that will help to ultimately reduce confusion between two composers of same name? Cmacsound (talk) 09:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC) Cmacsound (talk) 09:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I have added several more references to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Robert_Schleip where authors refer to Robert Schleip in their books. So I will resubmit the article again. Thanks --Maharani303 (talk) 10:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation: International Fall Workshops on Geometry and Physics (November 27)

Dear SwisterTwister, A series of international conferences devoted to an important scientific interface (mathematics and physics), and with a track record of almost 25 years, would seem to be notable! The webpages of the meetings, where available, are provided. The only other references I could add are bibliographic references to the published proceedings volumes. Would the article then be acceptable? Thanks. Iberian15 Iberian15 (talk) 13:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added third party references for Florida Bureau of Braille and Talking Books Library entry

Thank you for pointing out the lack of third party sources on the Florida Bureau of Braille and Talking Books Library article. I added various third party sources, as well as additional information. Although, I considered the Florida Library History Project to be a third party source as it was written by subject-matter experts on regional library history. Various Table Manners (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:UK Shaolin Temple

--M Niven (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)</ M Niven> Hello David, Thanskyou for taking the time to relook at my article. It has taken me a couple of attempts as I not very technical person. I have resubmitted more third party references and put links in there too to other wiki pages and also included a biog too. Is there anything else that you can suggest. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:UK_Shaolin_Temple Many thanks for your time</ M NIven>[reply]

Afc: Etta Federn

Dear David, Thank you for reading my article. I'm sorry that you felt Etta Federn lacks notability, particularly given that Wiki has been making an effort to include more women, in order to correct the imbalance in its entries. Etta Federn published 25 books in Germany before World War II; she had a voice and a power that few women attained in that era. Please let me know what I can do to improve the article. Many thanks, Gecko990 Gecko990 (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just would refer to some of the German sources, including an entry in Salomon Winingers Jewish encyclopedia, a chapter in Heuer and Heid and various press entries and reviews. Noteable for sure. Polentarion Talk 20:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your advice, dear Polentarion! I will add more sources, as you suggest. Gecko990 (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Youre welcome. My article on Andreas Anton is two sections above, so I did some drive by shooting. I have brought various anarchists to the German DYK mainpage section, so thats a pleasure for me to be of help. Polentarion Talk 22:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Polentarion, That's the first time I've ever appreciated a drive-by shooting! I've added even more sources to Etta, in addition to the ones you so kindly put in, and I fleshed out the article more. I've resubmitted, and we'll see if it's good to go now. Vielen vielen Dank for your help! Gecko990 (talk) 11:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20:04:46, 3 December 2015 review of submission by Hjp3697

Hjp3697 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:USF Health (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The content of the page has been edited to meet Wikipedia guidelines. Specifically, the tone has been adjusted to read with neutrality. Please, note that all the content includes citations. Please, also see this Wikipedia page, as a reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_South_Florida.

20:23:51, 3 December 2015 review of submission by Agnes.Szabo.1

Agnes.Szabo.1 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Éberség Intelligencia (AQ) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, the below was approved by the Hungarian Wikipedia - as it is supported by topic-independent, still specialist sources -. This page is a translation of that. Or, would you please explain the difference between the HU and the EN Wikipedia rules? Many thanks, Agi

Agnes.Szabo.1 Well, to be honest, there's not even much currently with that draft and what there is simply looks like an advertisement complete with words such "our". Instead, add better information and in-depth third-party sources such as news, journals and magazines overall. Also, in case you're not aware of it, WP:Referencing for beginners shows you how to better format the listed sources. I'm not an active user at Hungarian Wiki but the English Wiki is known to be more active of course and have higher standards. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 20:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The 99 (TV series)

The information on it seems an improvement, but I can't figure out the warnings that it gives when I try to accept. The references section seems different, but I don't see the open one, or the one out of place. Any ideas?Naraht (talk) 01:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The People's Alliance (Durham, NC)

Hi SwisterTwister. I've done some copy edits on the above draft and wonder if you have time to take another look. -- Diannaa (talk) 03:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ~! --Diannaa (talk) 03:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The People's Alliance (Durham, NC) has been accepted

The People's Alliance (Durham, NC), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 03:41, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:22:28, 4 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Dinowin

Dinowin (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Moovah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My article on Moovah was not accepted. The reference that I have mentioned are not valid. Please help me to publish this article. I just have these references only.

Rajashree

Dinowin (talk) 05:22, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:22:26, 4 December 2015 review of submission by KaranChopra271

KaranChopra271 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ananya Soni (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The sources I have used are reliable news outlets and websites, including official websites for the pageants and official commentators.

Yes KaranChopra271 but there simply are not enough as mentioned with my comment. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any more available in-depth third-party sources overall as mentioned. By the way, there's no need to add another section for your comment, simply comment below my comment. SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Simply edit the last section where I commented like above KaranChopra271 and, as for the sources, it is because there simply are not enough to fully satisfy the notability guidelines I mentioned at the draft. SwisterTwister talk 07:09, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:17:29, 4 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Shyamw1

Shyamw1 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

The article I submitted yesterday was rejected - I don't understand the reason of "notability" and hence this note. I was merely adding to an article that already existed about the subject. I found additional material in secondary sources which I have included in the inline citations and references. Not sure what I need to do to improve it. Please help.

Shyamw1 (talk) 13:17, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Rocky Mountain Radar

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rocky Mountain Radar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not sure how a page can be promotional when half of it refers to official investigations saying it was worthless. May well not be notable, but there's enough for A7. Thank you. Ged UK 13:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:36:57, 4 December 2015 review of submission by Aparker42

Aparker42 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Joel Snyder (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister:

Thank you for your review of the proposed article on Dr. Joel Snyder. I would appreciate it if you could specify:

- what material suggested copyright violations, - how the article can further indicate Dr. Snyder's notability beyond the significant awards, accomplishments, and his position as a pioneer in the development of audio description, and its principal exponent internationally over the last 35 years (these items are noted within the submitted article).

Many thanks for your assistance. It would be important to the field of audio description and its consumers (over 21 million people in the United States alone) to have this article accepted by Wickipedia.

Cordially,

Anthony Parker Aparker42 (talk) 15:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wales Green Party

Hi, I see that you reviewed the page. This has been the subject of a heated discussion as to whether or not is should be merged into Green Party of England and Wales. What is really needed is a neutral senior editor to look at the arguments for and against and close the review so that it is not felt that any particular vested interest has 'won' by closing it (as has happened before). If you have the time to do this, that would be great. Thanks. Btljs (talk) 16:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:12:49, 4 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Etruscanpress

Etruscanpress (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Philip Brady (poet) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, it has come to my attention that my writing of this article is a conflict of interest. Is there a way that I can pass along the writing of this article to another person without losing the work I've done so far? Thanks for all your help, reviewers! Etruscanpress (talk) 21:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Etruscanpress (talk) 21:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:59:18, 4 December 2015 review of submission by Fanaticalglobe

Fanaticalglobe (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kieran Max Goodwin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

"Comment: Not sure if there's enough for a solidly independently notable article"

Added more information regarding the individual. Hope this helps.

Please let me know.

Sorry but I'm simply not seeing much for satisfying notability, Fanaticalglobe. SwisterTwister talk 23:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry, all very new at this. The article has since been adjusted and will most probably be declined again. Will seek more notable articles about the individual. But for now, I am struggling to find anymore. Fanaticalglobe (talk) 00:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:04:48, 5 December 2015 review of submission by W. Brry

W. Brry (talk · contribs)
- User:W. Brry/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like a Re-Review on my article. The original intent was not to be a recipe guide but to show how and where the Kool-Aid pie originated. There are several versions out there, that's why I included the ingredients. I could leave out how it's made. I looked at some other food articles and while they did not include how to prepare them, I do think I remember reference to ingredients. I would like some assist on how to improve my article so it is accepted into Wikipedia please. Thank you.W. Brry (talk) 01:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:27:31, 5 December 2015 review of submission by MMZANetworx

MMZANetworx (talk · contribs)
- User:MMZANetworx/sandbox/Conquerors Sporting Club (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, the Conquerors Sporting Club is a new first division team that was just established and as time goes on we will obviously add many references.

At this stage it is confirmed by the Ghana Rugby Football Union as per references, and very influential independent news media such as the Ghana News Agency, Peace FM and Modern Ghana has already reported on the Club.

It is just like Blue Bulls but just very new and in smaller rugby union country.

Can we please get it published on Wikipedia?

11:52:18, 5 December 2015 review of submission by 41.190.14.104

41.190.14.104 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Biafranedu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

how will i write some news to support my article: 41.190.14.104 (talk) 11:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

prods

When nominating a person for regular prod, it helps to give some indication of his field. That way people can check the ones they are likely to know about. DGG ( talk ) 21:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21:12:30, 5 December 2015 review of submission by Pianogac

Pianogac (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Olga Jegunova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello

I have made several additions to the references since you said that the Olga Jegunova draft article "was getting closer" on November 24. Have you had chance to look at the more recent version?

Cheers

Geoff (pianogac)

Articles Created in Mainspace

Hello SwisterTwister, how are you? Over the past few days you declined two drafts that I worked on as non-notable. I believe that those subjects are notable, which is why I created those drafts. Anyway, I have created those drafts as articles in main space. If you believe that they are not notable, please take them to AFD. Remitly and Francis Bitonti.

I would like to keep working in the AFC. For future, how about if you send over drafts to me of subjects that you think are really notable. My interest is in editing articles about Visual artists. Thanks.Susana Hodge (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:48:44, 6 December 2015 review of submission by JeanetteW407

JeanetteW407 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:David Ward (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, I have now fully sourced cited the first reference in this article: Dalton, Stephen. I was led to believe that once I did this my article would be complete. Please can you advise? Thank You. JeanetteW407 (talk) 10:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Pilsner Urquell"

Thanks for looking.

Pilsner - one of the best beer - from Pilsen (Czech). Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz (talk) 17:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Needs some help

Hi. I've created some pages. Two of them, I've choose and I want you help me in improving these pages; Javed Hayat Abdul Karim Karimi I will be very grateful to you for this favour.

Regards Khesrawkakakhail (talk) 19:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 November 30#Vu Digital

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vu Digital (2nd nomination), you wrote "Delete for now" and the AfD was closed as "delete". At Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 November 30#Vu Digital, I asked for the community's permission to restore the history under the redirect so I can merge material to C Spire Wireless, the parent company.

I will only merge material sourced to TechCrunch, Mississippi Business Journal, Broadcasting & Cable, and The Clarion-Ledger, which all pass Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. I will not merge any material sourced only to press releases or sources that fail Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Would you support this? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 19:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Cunard. SwisterTwister talk 19:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, SwisterTwister! Would you comment about your thoughts about my proposal at the DRV, so editors know that as a "delete" participant, you are open to undeleting the history to facilitate a merge? Cunard (talk) 19:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote, "Restore and merge if it is actually beneficial as a merge can be made even if the article will still be deleted." Per Wikipedia:Merge and delete, a merge requires that the attribution history of an article be preserved.

Do you mean "Restore and merge if it is actually beneficial as a merge can be made even if the article will still be redirected." instead? Cunard (talk) 19:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I suppose if the history is needed then, redirect yes. SwisterTwister talk 19:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you clarify your comment at the DRV regarding deletion/redirection? Thank you, Cunard (talk) 20:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:05:54, 6 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by 24.36.64.112

24.36.64.112 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Steve Sinnicks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

After adding countless citations, links to verifiable sources, etc. there still seems to be issue with this submission. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Steve_Sinnicks The artist has been featured on CBC (National News & Information), The Hamilton Spectator (major market newspaper, part of the national chain Metroland Media), won Hamilton Music Awards for "Recording Of The Year" twice, City of Hamilton Arts Award for "Established Artist", played and recorded with many other major artists - who also play and appear on his recordings, interviewed and reviewed in national music magazines (Exclaim! and Chart Attack), played at major events and festivals including the nationally noted NXNE and Canada Music Week and charted on independent radio stations across the country. These all fit the definitions and guidelines for both notability and "reputable sources, independent of the topic/subject".

What else am I possibly missing? --24.36.64.112 (talk) 22:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

24.36.64.112 (talk) 22:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Links in PROD nominations

Hi, thanks for improving Wikipedia by proposing deletion of unjustified articles. May I suggest that you link abbreviations such as AfD and WP:TNT, to be more friendly to newcomers? e.g. in [23] Keep up the good work! – Fayenatic London 10:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:39:51, 7 December 2015 review of submission by Clipfunu

Clipfunu (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Eyal ben-Moshe (Eyal B) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Please review since I place 14 References and they are all from major sites in Israel! thanks Clipfunu (talk) 11:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Clipfunu and SwisterTwister: It might be worth asking at WP:ISRAEL or similar to check the references - some of them look like they could be good but I can't tell myself. Sam Walton (talk) 08:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) @Clipfunu and SwisterTwister: Hi, accoring to Israel they are very good (They are used all the time) and Eyal has an Hebrew article on Hebrew wiki. Can you approve the draft or what should I do? Clipfunu (talk) 10:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Note

Thanks for the note on my talk page. Even though I rarely find the time to edit, I still browse as my logged in name, check my messages etc. Every now and then, I archive my talk page to get rid of all the automated messages that seem to pile up. Anyways, thanks for the note on my talk page, It is nice to know that somebody notices when you are there and when you are not. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 16:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:44:53, 7 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by VicFury

VicFury (talk · contribs)
- Draft:US Coast Guard Counterintelligence Service (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The info received was that the USCG Counterintelligence Service is not notable. it is a US government intelligence agency and that is notable enough. In addition, I provided the link and bio for the current Director of that agency.

Please assist in helping to create this page as it is a known US agency within the USCG.

Thank you.

VicFury (talk) 16:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)==Ronnie[reply]

Ronnie Apteker

Hi Sister Twister

I have made a few amendments to the Ronnie Apteker - removed perceived promotional tone and added two good refs from Forbes magazine and Cape Times. I am still a little perturbed regarding your comments re Internet Solutions and R.A - the former is a piece of corporate promotional tripe with little merit, whereas Ronnie Apteker has surely a much greater claim to notability. See also his former partner's page - David Frankel - another piece of self-promotion that seems to have escaped the editor's attention. Surely this idea of one rule for one and another rule for another is not only unfair to contributors but damages Wikipedia's credibility? Picknick99 (talk) 19:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

00:58:44, 8 December 2015 review of submission by Entroporium

Entroporium (talk · contribs)
- Draft:WideOrbit (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

SisterTwister, I am miffed!

I believe I have offered everything you asked for and been true to the golden rule.

Significance: 36 references in a 370 word entry; I challenge any other business's wikipedia entry to match that rate of links to words. Software that runs 70%+ of US TV stations. Four funding rounds.
Reliable and Independent Sources: My 36 citations come from 18 discrete and totally legitimate media sources.

In addition, I have avoided marketing fluff, provided a whole lot of internal wiki links, and avoided the usual business rathole of trying to get in every last bit of history of product development, executive hires and so forth. Like these guys: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janrain or this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KIT_Digital

I look forward to hearing from you :- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Entroporium (talk • contribs) 00:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13:27:06, 8 December 2015 review of submission by Petpan089

Petpan089 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Yachtico (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, aren't Floridas three largest newspapers Suns Sentinel, Palm Beach Post and the Florida Business Journal very valid sources? If you google the five year old company you will find a lot about them all over the news: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22yachtico%22&tbm=nws since the beginning in 2011. What further sources would you recommend for citiation? There is also on of the founders and key people who has his own Wikipedia page.

Denny Somach

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Denny Somach, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! --Moonriddengirl ^(talk)

Request on 13:46:56, 8 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Eaprins

Eaprins (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Onno Greiner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister, Thanks for your review. The first reviewer told me: 'Please provide more references. This is a good draft, but it needs more sources.' So I did, and you wrote, 'Not entirely commenting about its notability but this will need any more available sources overall.'

Maybe you could say more directly what you are missing? Or is it an option to make the article shorter (just mention data and the most important projects)? I would really like to complete this article about an inspiring Dutch architect.

Best regards, Eaprins (talk) 13:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eaprins (talk) 13:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:34:57, 8 December 2015 review of submission by PoorRicardo

PoorRicardo (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Astor Hotel (Tianjin) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have added a reference from a CNN article. This is a George Washington slept here type of place in China. On the disambiguation page, it is notably unlinked to an article among the many Astor Hotels that are linked. This is my first ever article for Wikipedia and I would love to chat with you more about how to do a good job. Thanks, PoorRicardo (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:44:30, 8 December 2015 review of submission by Wodnikprasowy

Wodnikprasowy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:International Sailing Schools Association (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your review SwisterTwister. I do understand the purpose of wikipedia and have no intention to making an advertisement there. Yet somehow I cannot understand the difference between my submission and for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Yachting_Association, which is basically very similar organization. I can delete some adjectives like „successfully”, but this will only steal information from the submission. Where does advertisement start? I’m not telling there that the organization is super, extra, wonderful and beautiful. But I do want to mention achievements and describe the scope of activity. What kind of reliable, published sources can you find on the RYA entry, apart for the material produced by the creator? Mine submission has at least some sources other than that. Regards Wodnikprasowy (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for reviewing all of the articles that my students finished this semester! I appreciate your help. --RichardMcCoy (talk) 17:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:04:04, 8 December 2015 review of submission by Swelch12

Swelch12 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Carbon Engineering (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi - my submission was rejected due to references, however, I included reputable sources including Fast Company, NPR, CBC News, Nature, Toronto Star, New York Times and FORTUNE. I talked to the live desk and they were stumped on the rejection due to sources. Would it be possible to get some advice on what can be added to help get approval?

Swelch12 (talk) 18:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)swelch12[reply]

04:23:26, 9 December 2015 review of submission by Sergem1

Sergem1 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Waterstart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

Could you please elaborate what is exactly wrong with the draft: reference source quality (I was trying to get something that could be verified online, not by hunting Windsurifng Magazine archives) or whether waterstart is a notable windsurfing maneuver (It is an essential skills for sailing high winds, it would be safe to say that half of all windsurfers in the world do it several times during their sessions)?

Thank you! Sergem1 (talk) 04:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please help! Sergem1 (talk) 03:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Found your comment, thanks Sergem1 (talk) 03:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability: Agarwal Packers and Movers

Hi Swister Twister, I wanted to get your advice after your review of the article. Am I flogging a dead horse here? I thought I had enough to get the article over the line but I guess that wasn't your take on it. I know the removalist industry is not that exciting a starting point for creating a Wikipedia career and I've spent so much time learning about it and reading articles about it that I'm reluctant to give up on it....I think there are cruddier less deserving articles that have been accepted into Wikipedia (though admitted I haven't seen one for a while). But there does reach a point where I may need to be told if the subject matter is inherently un-notable and is never going to make it, so that I can find a new hobby to write about. Anyway, your feedback would be great. Where am I going wrong? Or is because the topic is salted due to previous puff pieces being done? (not sure if you knew this, but I found some of the history...and this topic has had some really crap articles written for it). Cheers Alokibees (talk) 05:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:09:35, 9 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Gaur07

Gaur07 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Winjit Technologies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, I have made the changes in my draft..I have added the notable resources..can you please have a look.

Gaur07 (talk) 06:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:29:16, 9 December 2015 review of submission by 14.99.101.177

14.99.101.177 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sumana Mukherjee (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

please let me know why it has not been published, where are the loops and what i need to do to improve it.

06:30:36, 9 December 2015 review of submission by Gaur07

Gaur07 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Winjit Technologies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

SwisterTwister..I have added reliable resources to the text. I tried to balance out my text and resources for the page. I will add content gradually with proper citations. Can you please now review the text? Let me know if I have to make any changes to the drafts.

06:50:14, 9 December 2015 review of submission by Ekvastra

Ekvastra (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Hindu Economic System (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can I add references to the article in draft space or should I move it to userspace, improve and then submit again? --Ekvastra (talk) 06:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

9 December 2015 - notability requirements for AfC by Kentunderstand

Hi SwisterTwister - thanks for taking another look at my submission. I'm puzzled about the notability requirements. As there are four separate articles from TechCrunch, and another from Bloomberg Business, I'm not sure what kind of coverage would be better - any advice?

Kentunderstand (talk) 13:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:06:12, 9 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by ForeitN

ForeitN (talk · contribs)
- Draft:William J. Perry Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm sending this message trying to figure out why my submission for wikipedia was declined. It was cited for lack of notability. I am somewhat confused, as the four other Defense Security Cooperation Agency (Part of US Dept of Defense) regional centers (George C. Marshall Center for European Security Studies, Near East South Asia Center for Security Studies, Africa Center for Security Studies, and the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies have entries in wikipedia, and some of them have even less reference material that is even valid.

Would adding more references to the entry help with the submission? If so, what sort of references would be suggested?

Thank you for your help.

ForeitN (talk) 14:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:21:30, 9 December 2015 review of submission by Jgreene1333

Jgreene1333 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ken Seiff (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Added substantial new content, including WSJ blog, NY Times, 2 books, trade publications, and NY Post articles

Jgreene1333 (talk) 16:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)jgreene1333[reply]

Request on 16:22:17, 9 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mds43

Mds43 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Catapult Chicago (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have submitted the Catapult Chicago page several times. I have cited sources and referenced articles to make the entry both "notable" and "objective". I do not understand how/why it keeps getting rejected. Mds43 (talk) 16:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Teller and the Truth

Thank you for taking the time to review the page I created. In your comments you asked that I "Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia." The film I have created the page for premiered at the Austin Film Festival, has been picked up for distribution, and will be available on iTunes, Amazon, and Netflix, starting in February. I have several more sources of information I can include for references but because the film has not yet premiered widely I do not have national critic reviews just yet. I can link to the film's website and imdb page, would that help? My main question is what I do now to get the page created?

Thank you for your time!

paintbynumberss

Paintbynumberss (talk) 21:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Altered States declined

Thank you for taking the time to review my article at Draft:Altered States: a cyberpunk sci-fi anthology. WendigoUK (talk) 21:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:47:43, 10 December 2015 review of submission by Chis Maxwell

Chis Maxwell (talk · contribs)
- Draft:James Chisholm (Senior) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I note my article on James Chisholm (Senior) has been rejected based on a lack of notability ["While most historical subjects are accepted, I'm simply not seeing the solid notability here"], suggesting the addition of more (independent) secondary sources and improvement of referencing. I have currently included some 40 primary sources in this article. With very few exceptions, the only major second source is the biography of the man's life that has just been published (The Merchant of Sydney). At the launch of this book, Emeritus Professor Brian Fletcher, one of Australia's most distinguished historians of early colonial history, said it was extraordinary that such a prominent colonial identity had, to date, "slipped through the historian's net" and had "been sorely neglected for some two centuries". As Professor Fletcher says, James Chisholm has been largely ignored for more than 200 years, and yet he was the equal of many who already feature strongly in the articles of Wikipedia, and certainly exceeds many others in notability. He was a major early entrepreneur and merchant; responsible. possibly only secondary to Robert Campbell, for opening up significant trade with Bengal; he owned a large area of the early town of Sydney; he was selected by Governor Macquarie as a member of his Governor's Court (apart from the Judge Advocate, there was only one other member); he owned the first Bank of New South Wales of which he was a founding shareholder and Director; and he was widely acclaimed as one of Sydney's most respected early citizens. He has been neglected by history because he was a modest man who did not promote himself, and did not leave a collection of documents. I have tried to avoid rhetoric and stuck to the facts. I am able to add many more primary sources to this article, if this is required. However, the only other secondary sources that mention him are already cited. Can you please advise on how I should proceed? With thanks Chis Maxwell

Marek Piwowski

This person is IMHO certainly notable, as a director of major movies (see The Cruise (1970 film), the red links in the article need some redirects). Also, note the entry at [24]. It is my opinion that for biographies of Polish artist, having an article about oneself at culture.pl is a sufficient criteria for being notable (reliable in-depth coverage); culure.pl IMHO is akin to an online encyclopedia of Polish culture. If there are any other bios by that editor you'd like me to review, let me know, I looked at one more and it appears notable. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:57:51, 10 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by ProSOSeng

ProSOSeng (talk · contribs)
- Draft:StarOfService (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, Thank you for reviewing my article. I have put a lot of newspapers references (french like les echos, or english like Techcrunch or Entrepreneur India). the articles are about either the globalisation of the companies or the annual survey who's doing the media buzz each year with the top three regions for entrepreneurship in France. I don't really know which kind of articles more i can find on this startup. Could you help me on this ? Thanks a lot (ProSOSeng (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2015 (UTC) ProSOSeng (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:52:36, 10 December 2015 review of submission by Renglish00

Renglish00 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Insight Global (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I am completely new to making Wikipedia articles and would like some guidance. I read your comments but would like to know exactly what was not sufficient about the sources referenced. I used the article for Allegis Group as an example while writing this article and felt they had met similar standards. If you could please advise which sources are not in-depth enough, I would appreciate it.

Corporate Brain

For your information, Corporate Brain, which you accepted, has been nominated for deletion and is now being discussed at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

02:09:33, 11 December 2015 review of submission by Carll253

Carll253 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Conversica (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you give more insight on why you feel the entry is not notable? I read the guidelines on notable, and feel that the third party awards that the company has received give the company the notability that is required. Thanks Carll253 (talk) 02:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admiral Markets article resubmission

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you for your comment that you left on the Admiral Markets page. I have updated the references now. Can you please check and approve? If there is any issue then please let me know. Thanks. Ifr ko (talk) 12:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please suggest how we can improve his page & make him a part of the wikipedia. Thanks Anubhav Anubhav (talk) 11:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SwisterTwister, Happy new years. It has been a long time now, can you please check the article? Thanks. Ifr ko (talk) 08:34, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

re: Seoul Independent Film Festival

This article is written by a student of mine, and I think it's a notable topic - the article already cites three newspapers (one in English) that focus on the festival. GNews search also brings up [25]. Google shows it has an entry on English language Korean government official tourism site, [26]. There is stuff like [27]. I think the topic is notable enough for a "recurring event" (Wikipedia:Notability (events), and although I am a bit biased (my student), you know I am also not the one to promote spam... so could you reconsider your decline here? We could take it to AfD, if you'd insist. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Piotrus, I agree with you that it's notable, but perhaps you can get the student to rewrite it in sentences, not bullet points. DGG ( talk ) 23:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DGG She did it at Draft:Seoul Independent Film Festival. I didn't realize there was another worse copy of the draft in mainspace... was it deleted and restored? It's a bit ironic we have a poor article in mainspace and her attempts to move her better draft out there have been rejected. PS. SwisterTwister, would you mind telling me why are you ignoring this thread? Tomorrow is the last day of the class and I still can't tell her that her article is fine. Sigh. Wikipedia is NOT friendly to newbies - case in point. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Piotrus, I've been busy around here and frankly I also haven't been motivated as usual here (because of some uncomfortable events recently), but I would say it's best to work and make the current article better before we take it to AfD (unless you want others to comment, for that matter). I would also say drafting and userfying is an option for now. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sam, could you do me a favor and move it to the mainspace (merging article histories), and if you want, take it to AfD then? I think it's notable as it is, and I don't think more work is needed here (for proving notability). The only problem I see is that the student, without asking, worked on it in the annoying draft userspace, rather then in Sandboxes. I find drafts very bad - they let through a ton of spam, and then add a layer of bureaucracy on the good articles like this. If I knew how that damn system works, I'd have approved it myself, but I am stuck having to ask somebody familiar with this (you or DGG) to mainspace the article. Once it is there, again, feel free to AfD it if you feel this needs further review. Thanks, PS. Don't let the wikistress get to you. In the past the best remedy for me was to ignore flamewars and just write some new content. DYK something and you'll feel better. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who's "Sam"?

I'm now userfying it, yes. Cheers Piotrus and what always makes me feel better is simply knowing there are still amicable and beneficial users here.

SwisterTwister talk 07:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, for some reason I was thinking of you as SamTwister; maybe your username run into my semi-automated pun detection and destruction system. Wikipedia can be a grueling experience sometimes; but writing content helped me survive my darker days here, even when I felt that most of the "community" wanted to crucify me, I kept writing for the general public. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:31:03, 11 December 2015 review of submission by Dshargrett

Dshargrett (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Jamison Ross (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

I have added a line at the end of the article that should establish notability. Please advise.

Thanks,

David

Trove and AustLit

I removed the deletion notice at Goldie Alexander because I found a detailled biography of her and reviews of her work at Trove and a different biography and information on her awards at AustLit. While AustLit focuses on Australian authors, Trove might be more broadly useful when assessing pages for deletion. In particular, Trove's 'people' search allows you to find works about a person, not just by them. Please consider adding these sources to your pre-deletion search when appropriate. Thank you. --211.30.17.74 (talk) 01:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Simpel-Fonetik Method of Writing

Hi SwisterTwister, I have removed the child lit project from the above talkpage as i don't think the article is under the purview of the project. But, i have also added a couple of projects which appear more appropriate, hope this is okay? ps. you do awesome work!

Coolabahapple (talk) 02:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Oussama_Belhcen

Hi SwisterTwister. I've done some edits on the draft Draft:Oussama_Belhcen and wonder if you have time to take a look at it. -- Othmanebenjelloun (talk) thank you. —Preceding undated comment added 10:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Anil Gupta

Hi SwisterTwister. Thanks on your previous reviews of the article. I've added more links to primary sources as well as a section, with links, on discussions of Gupta's work.

I feel I need to add that the notability of contemporary authors who work in technical fields such as logic often does not correspond with a high online presence or linkable articles in news outlets. In all honesty, I really think that, within the discipline in which Gupta works, the article in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy on the Revision Theory suffices to show his notability: he developed an original theory of truth which is a rival of theories proposed by people like Kripke. That alone is a major contribution achieved by very few people who work in the discipline. I recognize the importance of Wikipedia's notability criteria, however, and hope that I have now done enough to show Gupta's notability. I hope you'll have time to look over the draft again; I look forward to your feedback.

Many thanks, 44 DFW (talk) 17:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Proposed deletion

Ta for the Thanks but really, you shouldn't encourage me. Prod-2 is - at best - a good babysteps exercise for wannabe serious deleters; for me its a notorious timewaster and a terrible temptation to exercise the sort of concise honesty that pisses the admins right off. I just held back from this (an SPA about his aristocratic name, who'll write an article on every family member that ever had a job if we let it) because its 4 days ago and its all of course entirely pointless. Just amusing myself for the risk of the getting told off by the po-faced twat doing the deletion. But then, if I did make you smile, it was worth it. All the best. Plutonium27 (talk) 22:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peter von Puttkamer

Considering the awards, Isuggesafd, not prod. Personally, I have no opinion one way or another. DGG ( talk ) 23:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:23:18, 14 December 2015 review of submission by Otherbin

Otherbin (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Samuel Colman (Publisher) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for looking at my article on Samuel Colman. This is my first article. I don't quite understand about the citations. It seems as if I have plenty of references/links. Could you pick out a specific sentence or paragraph and tell me what kind of citation it needs? Thanks. I really appreciate your help. Otherbin (talk) 06:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Otherbin Simply needs any more available sources as mentioned as I'm simply not convinced all of the listed ones fully satisfy and suggest notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ODNB

I noticed [28]. But a full article in DNB has been regarded in many AfD decisions as proof of notability, even without anything else--and in fact we have many bio articles based on it alone. The same is true for similarly selective national bibliographies of other countries. DGG ( talk ) 17:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review Request

Kindly review another page that I created two days back: Śrāvaka (Jainism). Thank you-जैन (talk) 03:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) -जैन (talk) 03:34, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Cloudcade Re-Review and Update

Hi Swister, since you last reviewed the article, I've managed to isolate more sources that are as recent as Dec regarding the notoriety of the Company. Please take a look at the source from PocketGamer as this should now meet the criterias you mentioned with the missing of current sources. Please re-view and help me publish the article, thanks!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cloudcade

The Miracles Sing Modern

Please see all references included with article. At least four different albums by The Miracles refer to this album's existence...(including two of them by Official Miracles biographer Stu Hackel) in Motown Records' liner notes in those albums. Many Thanks, Willgee (talk) 05:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reviewing Liam Zammit an article I wrote. Xender Lourdes (talk) 13:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:40:16, 16 December 2015 review of submission by 74.205.144.26

74.205.144.26 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Group Publishing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Additional references and information added.

How to get resolve the 'not enough sources' feedback on Article for Creation

Hi, I've noticed there's a draft for Ennismore, with the comment that there isn't enough sources. I'm interested in writing about this topic. How many sources/ what type of sources would be required? Can you give any examples of what you feel would be appropriate?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alicetate (talk • contribs) 16:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Check

Hello , you are an exprienced editor, I think this band Arsames is not notable enough. please check. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 17:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re-review article

Hi SwisterTwister,

In reference to the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zesty.io, I've taken your suggestions into consideration and added several more credible sources over the past month or so. I think this is what you were looking for... If you wouldn't mind reviewing and providing more feedback, that would be much appreciated!

Best,

D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.183.165.106 (talk) 17:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What facts have I to refer with which kind of sources?

Hi Dear! I am working at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Form . I just deleted all refs to make them again. Please, explain in several words, which facts i can refer with official program website, for example, and what with third-party articles, and etc... have i to refer simply each sentence? i am trying to do it in the way like other programs are described. I have a lot of information about what i write, but don't understand which one to use in the certain sentence... Also, could I rename Draft:Form to Draft:QForm, because the program i write about is QForm, not Form - i didnt name it so. Also, can i use russian sources to refer? Thank you a lot. Glad to hear from you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mskpetrov (talk • contribs) 08:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, whatever available solid in-depth third-party sources overall there are Mskpetrov. SwisterTwister talk 08:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

From what I understand the problem is that you consider the page to be advertising and it contains no references. While I do work in the marketing department of the company I should point out the pages were not meant as advertising, and apologize if it seemed that way. They were written just to offer people a simpler way to get information about the subjects. While we are trying to provide people with a service to reduce invisible lost time the page doesn’t refer to our product, nor does it point to it since there is quite a few companies with similar products. It only points out that it was first developed and used by Statoil and TDE, which is understandable since our managing director has a doctorate in petroleum engineering and has researched it extensively, the main page for the TDE Group is a brief description of the company and the companies within it.

If you could please just write me what needs to be added/Removed from/to the pages I can do it.

Thank you

Josko wk (talk) 09:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have a WP:COI, please follow the suggestions here. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 09:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subject's notability not adequate

Hi SwisterTwister!

Thank you for reviewing my Draft:The 120 Media Collective. I've read the rules and added references from legitimate news websites and press sources to add to the subject's notability. Have deleted a bunch of it due to previous declined submissions. Please could you help suggest what to add to in terms of notability? Have mentioned awards won and the sources are all verifiable too. Would a table of awards work?

Thank you in advance. Roshni3423 (talk) 10:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Query

My page for 'Texas Studies in Literature and Language' was declined owing to lack of notability. I am genuinely puzzled by this rationale, as the journal had a vacant link on the entry for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Texas_Press (where 5 of 11 similar journals already have Wikipedia pages). The journal is one of the oldest continually-published academic journals in the States, and is indexed in all the major places. It is difficult to understand (sincerely) how TSLL is less notable than hundreds of other academic journals that currently have Wikipedia pages.

For the record, here are the other journals that currently possess pages just from this press alone:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinema_Journal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_%26_Culture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_the_History_of_Sexuality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Latin_American_Geography [[29]]

Please let me know how I can highlight TSLL's notability in a manner that equates to the entries above. Thank you! B802818827 (talk) 01:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03:23:14, 18 December 2015 review of submission by Rasmussene

Rasmussene (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Linton Wells II (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister,

I need, please, a little help in determining how this entry for Lin Wells lacks third-party validation. He's a former Assistant Secretary of Defense, the first Department of Defense CIO, author of several definitive works in defense and humanitarian assistance, and created entire sections of the disaster relief policies that the US Department of Defense now uses in places like the Banda Aceh tsunami, Supertyphoon Haiyan, and Katrina. He lectures governments all over the world and is a personal advisor to Ashraf Ghani, the President of Afghanistan (though we won't mention that in the article), and your Elonka Dunin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elonka_Dunin) asked him at DEFCON in Las Vegas why he didn't have an entry. She has volunteered to talk with anyone about a submission for him but I rather just get it right on my own. I've admired him for years and took this on voluntarily as a gesture of respect, but I seem to be messing it up. Based on the September rejection I've contributed quite a few third-party references. What's missing that might help?

To be clear, I'm not objecting to the rejection - I'm trying to accept your critique. But it seems I need a little help. Thanks for your advice.

Eric Eric Rasmussen, MD, MDM, FACP (talk) 03:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold page

Hello SwisterTwister,

Thank you very much for posting the article I submitted, Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold.

I want to note that I am an employee of Manifest, a marketing agency representing Abbott Vascular. I have made some edit requests on the Talk pages of other stent-related Wikipedia pages, and a disclaimer has appeared with those requests (see, for example, Talk:Percutaneous coronary intervention). There is a mention of my affiliation on the talk page of the new Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold article (somehow this was copied over from a posting I made on "Wikipedia talk: WikiProject Medicine").

But please let me know if you advise that I should add any specific disclaimer information on the new Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold article. We want to ensure that we are compliant with Wikipedia requirements.

Thank you again.

Tom at Manifest (talk) 22:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnie Apteker

Hello SisterTwister. I have tried to make contact a couple of times to ask for help and advice, but so far no response. I wanted to tell you that a) I added some further refs to the page and b), more surprisingly, I see that a Ronnie Apteker page was created as long ago as 2010 and voted a 'Keep' after someone questioned notability. It seems unusual that a page would be deemed ok five years ago, but not today when so many improvements have been made to it. Can't we all stick by the rules and the decisions? I am puzzled as to why the Ronnie Apteker page was turned into a Redirect to Internet Solutions, and yet no mention is made on Apteker on that page, which seems a pretty dumb use of a redirect. Picknick99 (talk) 22:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for

reviewing my new article, Aiyangiyang! -Darouet (talk) 00:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not logged in user

Are you affiliated with any of the following users?

MB298 (talk) 01:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I was actually about to send you a message as well MB298, I am absolutely not and it seems they're not even registered accounts! I am even convinced they may've started all of these new accounts (see these new "userpages"). SwisterTwister talk 01:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had noticed Notloggedin had started over a dozen userpages; each copying the exact content of your own userpage (including the two above). At first I thought that they had clicked on several redlinked userpages and copy-pasted the data into them, but then it appeared the users had no talk page and no contributions. MB298 (talk) 01:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MB298 Yes and fortunately both Diannaa and Mike V have cleaned all of the troubles, it's worth noting they stated copying and pasting Diannaa's userpage as well so you may've been the next one.

Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 02:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Log

Yeah I know. Maybe it's tiredness but I found myself laughing at Not Log's silliness and thought I'd make a joke with Diannaa. I do that sometimes.

Oh and while I'm here, my best wishes to you for Christmas. I've seen you around since I've been here. Slight Smile 02:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD for User:Aleuuhhmsc/sandbox

Hi. I removed all the unnecessary content from my sandbox, User:Aleuuhhmsc/sandbox, so this issue should be resolved. So then, I'd like to get the MfD thing removed from it, please. It's starting to piss me off now. Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 03:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag on Maryann Krieglstein Comment

Thank you for taking the time to review this article and publish it out of Articles for Creation. I'm curious about your interpretation of the COI tag. Specifically, if you think the peer review from the Articles for Creation process is sufficient to remove it or if further peer review is necessary. Or if it should remain indefinably.

On a side note: I think this process worked great for COI publishing and we should recommend anyone trying to push a COI article to go to AFC for support and peer review. I've already started doing so with new editors. Of course, only after pointing them to the COI literature about what is appropriate.

Cheers. --Dkriegls (talk to me!) 11:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki page for Dr. Ramaswamy

Hi my username is anubhavsingh1987. I am writing about the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hosahalli_S._Ramaswamy. For Dr. Ramaswamy, criteria 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) are satisfied. He has 400 research papers, is author of several books, his work has been cited >6000 times, has been awarded Life Time achievement awards & is a fellow of many international societies, & is the editor of Journal of Food Engineering, best journal in food engineering. I am sure he deserves a wikipedia entry according to criteria 2, 3, 4, 5, 8.

Thanks for patrolling my page

Hello David, Thanks for patrolling my page. Patrolled to me means approved for creation the page for public. Am I right? If not can you help me to improve it based on your experience. ThanksAlireza.niakani (talk) 15:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alireza.niakani For User:Alireza.niakani/Rebis Academy of Technology, it unfortunately is not solidly acceptable yet as it needs in-depth third-party sources overall from places such as news, journals and magazines. also consider seeing schools notability guidelines. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my draft

I have thoroughly researched and checked and found that all NCache articles are completely different from the one I added. This NCache is a Distributed_cache for .NET applications. Thanks :)Jaimie_daz (talk) 00:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

James Bethel Gresham Review

Thanks for the review, I am fairly new to creating pages, but I noticed that Thomas Enright and Merle Hay were both copied verbatim from Find a Grave. I cleaned up Enright's page, but I haven't figured out what I want to do with Hay's. I am still trying to track down more information on his early life. If you could review both of those pages, that would help out a lot. Feickus (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brighton Festival Chorus

Hi David, Thanks for reviewing my draft submission. Regarding the notability of the subject, I've checked the Wikipedia:Notability (music) guidelines, and I think Brighton Festival Chorus meets the criteria for musicians and ensembles, specifically meeting the following criteria:

5. Has released two or more albums on a major record label
- As you'll see from the selected discography, BFC has released albums on many major labels
7. Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city
- I've added a reference to a newspaper article concerning BFC's place in the music scene of Brighton
8 Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award.
- Recordings featuring BFC has been nominated for 2 Grammy awards (references provided)

I hope this helps. I'll have a look to see if I can find any other relevant references, and then I'll resubmit. Thanks, Kevin Callagkm (talk) 13:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:08:00, 21 December 2015 review of submission by Alby27

Alby27 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ontario Games (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for the review!

Type of information about the Ontario Games is very similar to the Canada Games. To understand what is required is it just more information and links to things about the Ontario Games? The Games are in the process of transition, the rights holder of the Games - Sport Alliance Ontario went bankrupt in April - there are news articles about that can be referenced. Current rights holders - the Government of Ontario does not have information listed on their website about the Games so it is hard to reference it. Additionally, information about past Ontario Games can be difficult to find since websites usually shut down shortly after the Games complete.

If it is simply getting more references, I can do a complete search but want to know I am close.

Thanks for all the help!

Request on 19:59:40, 21 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by VicFury

VicFury (talk · contribs)
- Draft:US Coast Guard Counterintelligence Service (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I received a message that the subject could not be created because the topic was not notable even though it is a US government agency tasked with national security as part of the Intelligence Community (IC). I provided several references but I am confused as to what I need to complete this report. Any assistance is appreciated.

Also, I created a previous entry, the Massachusetts Probation Service (MPS) and I have some clipart that I wanted to add tot he page but don't know how to add photos?

Thank you.

VicFury (talk) 19:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

VicFury, the problem is not that it isn't notable, but, as the notice says, that it didn't have sufficient references to show notability. Yoou need to find and add references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements or anything published by the agency. DGG ( talk ) 19:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oceann Hai

Be careful, someone wants to put words in your mouth: [30] [31] Timmyshin (talk) 23:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahaha

I noticed that Timmyshin and it's certainly not the first time. Aside from your ping and message, I always watch my voted AfDs so I would've likely seen it immediately as well. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 23:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could I double check the astronomy articles you've reviewed for anything you might've missed?

User:JHRock put the hoax template on an erroneous article that he created 6 minutes earlier and never came back. He also changed 2 correct letters in an infobox which changed it from okay to tens of billions of times too bright. He put KKR 25's (dimmer) blue magnitude in an infobox that doesn't accept absmag_b. I don't know what the heck he's doing. Both of those articles you reviewed had numerical errors you didn't notice so maybe there's more out there? Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 04:19, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sagittarian Milky Way I looked through all of his contributions quite fast as there aren't many to begin with but the current articles, whether entirely accurate or not, seem notable and acceptable. I found the article because of the tag and I've encountered a few other new astronomy articles but they all seem acceptable as well. Feel welcome to make any changes you feel are necessary. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 04:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They're fine now because I fixed them. Apparent magnitude -10 is about the brightness of the half moon so if a galaxy had that brightness it would cast shadows at night. If you saw any other recently born articles of galaxies over several hundred thousand light years wide or apparent magnitudes smaller than 10 (like -10) then those are likely fake. Absolute magnitudes however should be negative because those are how bright they'd look if every star were 10 parsecs away — far, far closer than any galaxy. If you didn't then I guess it might be okay now. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 04:56, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know User:Yimingguo and his socks User:JHRock, User:AndromedaTwister and User:SreewGalaxy were indefinitely blocked today. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 20:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The TEAK Fellowship

Hello! Thank you for reviewing my article. Your comment was: "Simply still not enough in-depth third-party sources overall." I have four newspaper sources, which are articles written expressly about the fellowship. They include New York Times and People. I'm sure tens of thousands of accepted Wikipedia articles don't have such strong sources. I appreciate your hard work and I know you are doing your best to be objective. But I can't help thinking an injustice has been made and I can't do anything about it any more. I have great sources. I can't provide any better. Please help. --Judtrap (talk) 11:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the main problem is now the tone--see my comment of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Pepper draft

I have to say, your reason for why you declined my submission at AfC was the one I was least expecting. I tried my best to cite as many sources as I can to prove that the subject was notable. Would you mind elaborating on why you don't think that draft meets WP:GNG? Your comment on the draft says that there's not much to suggest notability "aside from getting some expected coverage for controversies". What I would like to know is why the controversies have to be tossed aside when considering his notability. Those incidents are what he is most notable for, so is there a reason why those can't be taken into account? I'd love to hear your thoughts. Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 16:43, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:09:54, 22 December 2015 review of submission by Josh.Nickell

Josh.Nickell (talk · contribs)
- Draft:American Rental Association (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

00:53:06, 23 December 2015 review of submission by NicholasReedy

NicholasReedy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Xodus (magazine) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As requested, further citations and links to help cite the Notability requirements have now been added. Please check number 7, 22, and 23.

Also, you will note that the text has been also updated to include the comments published by ""Your Essential Guide to Queer Pop Culture" " which includes information on Xodus Magazine that should help fulfill another verification of the Notability for the Magazine.

Fort Worth, Texas magazine declined again

You declined my post at the below link saying that it doesn't meet the notability guidelines for a journal, but it's not a journal. It is a monthly magazine. Please advise. I have a lot of sources.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Fort_Worth,_Texas_magazine

Also, how are my sources any different than what is provided on a similar page. See here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_Magazine

Fwtxmag (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review of submission by Swelch12 - Reference Question

Hi - my submission was rejected due to references, however, I included reputable sources including NBC News, Forbes, Live Science and Campus Technology. Would it be possible to get some advice on what can be added to help get approval?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Artec_3D

Submission declined on 21 December 2015 by SwisterTwister

Hello, dear! I can't understand what now wrong with the citations. I provided sources on which i was based when writing the article. Also, i did it in the similar way as another software article close to QForm - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceClaim I really don't see the difference. Please, provide with the detailed answer. Thanks a lot! Wish you a merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mskpetrov (talk • contribs) 11:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DLA Piper

Just an FYI I left you a note over at Talk:DLA Piper. I look forward to your input. Thanks. NinaSpezz (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at some of your recent AfC acceptances

An example is Big Grrrl Small World where you used the AFCH script to accept it, but, somehow, it has not been cleaned properly and is thus in Category:Pending AfC submissions in article space.

I have seen this happen when the reviewer works faster than the software. It usually happens when we close the window/tab with the draft in it before the script has finished.

Would you mind double checking for your next few acceptances and also going back over some of your recent ones, please? Fiddle Faddle 17:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Moti Kahana

I did some work on Draft:Moti Kahana today. I was surprised that you had declined this article with "Although it seems he's gotten coverage for his activities, there's simply not enough in-depth third-party solid sources to suggest fully satisfying notability guidelines." There are 16 references in the article, almost all renominated American or Israeli newspapers, that establish his notable involvement in notable companies and events. Might I ask you to review the article once more? If you still find the article lacking, please give me some specific clues, as to what you feel the problem is. Debresser (talk) 18:53, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you have been around on Wikipedia, but have found the time to reply. I think that I'll take my chances with moving this draft to article mainspace in a few days. If so, please don't take it personal. Debresser (talk) 13:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:40:17, 24 December 2015 review of submission by Retengineer

Retengineer (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Anna Ciddor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you very much for your help improving the article. I have now included many more third party sources as you suggested and I can see how this has improved the article. I hope this article is now acceptable. Thank you again.Retengineer (talk) 06:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:25:45, 24 December 2015 review of submission by Zeitwerk

Zeitwerk (talk · contribs)
- Draft:EZA Watches (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your comments on the piece. It is my first time on wiki and I would like to get more information about small watch brands in wikipedia. What should I do and how could I improve the first article about Eza Watches? I tried to find extra sources, but this is all there is according to me. Thanks in advance. Warm regards.

Koloff article

I want to see what you think of Kolby Koloff?The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup needed.

The following pages appear to have been accepted by you from AFC and moved to mainspace, but somehow not finished, could you please check?

Naraht (talk) 13:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:59:13, 26 December 2015 review of submission by Olympiclin

Olympiclin (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Steven Jastrabek (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi. Olympiclin here. I am a hairdresser with links to the Olympic movement for the last 20 years. I have many newspaper and magazine articles that have been written on the subject. Any advice?Olympiclin (talk) 11:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Howard Barnes

Hi David,

Thankyou for your assistance with the Andrew Howard Barnes Page. Would be grateful if you would be able to direct me further. I now have 24 high quality third party (media) links and proof points and meta data which mainly illustrate the entrepreneur and philanthropy innovations, plus illustrating how he is innovating / redefining the old fashioned paper based "will creation" into digital to make wills make more accessible. regards

Please let me know where I should make alterations

PS. Now have 31 !

Dwayne

DwayneJAlexander (talk) 03:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lisa Goodrich

Heyo SwisterTwister and Merry Christmas :) I hope everything is well. The draft clearly meets #5 of WP:PROF which states: Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. Goodrich is a professor at Harvard Medical School and the sources (including the official Harvard website) confirm it. Even if any article contains only primary sources (which isn't the case here), there is no need of additional sources as long as facts like that are established and I would appreciate if you would reconsider. Happy holidays BTW :) Ya sh ! 06:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12:50:42, 27 December 2015 review of submission by EefeG0hi

EefeG0hi (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Voter Surveillance (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is a developing topic with few scientific references yet. Bennett's article has been well received: E.g. https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2015/11/voter_surveilla.html More information can be found in Schneier's book. https://www.schneier.com/books/data_and_goliath/ I could add that reference.

Bennett has at least two more papers on this topic specifically: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2605183 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2279920 I haven't read them, so, I'd prefer others to add these references later.

As for notability, there is already an article on voter databases. Voter surveillance takes this to a new level. Here are some press outlets reporting on the issue. I left these reference out to avoid controversy, as it directly relates to the upcoming elections in the US. Would you prefer me to put them in? Cruz: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cruz-campaign-credits-psychological-data-and-analytics-for-its-rising-success/2015/12/13/4cb0baf8-9dc5-11e5-bce4-708fe33e3288_story.html http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/428480/ted-cruzs-big-data-collection-can-it-really-help-him-win http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/11/senator-ted-cruz-president-campaign-facebook-user-data

Obama: https://www.propublica.org/article/is-your-neighbor-a-democrat-obama-has-an-app-for-that

13:14:40, 27 December 2015 review of submission by ReubenSandwichNYC

ReubenSandwichNYC (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Cynthia Mailman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm curious as to how many reference one needs for an artist's listing... Ms Mailman was involved in the Sister Chapel a significant women's art event of the 70's, as well as being a founder of SoHo20, both referenced here on Wiki.... Also had major work destroy in WTC attack, also referenced right here on Wiki.... You advice on how to improve this will be appreciated. RS

Kian Lawley

Unprotected now. I'm not an expert on the notability of YouTubers, but it shouldn't be a candidate for the speedy deletion that befell its predecessors, could be AfDed i suppose, but looks OK to me Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy (disambiguation)

You accepted this AfC despite it having been declined twice [32][33] and the IP editor tendentiously removing prior declined reviews four times [34][35][36][37] with no change in the article prior to doing so. Were you aware of this? Since you accepted the article, it has been tagged for AfD, which of course the IP editor is edit warring to remove [38]. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

S. Srikanta Sastri

It looks like you approved this article at AfC but perhaps didn't remove the main template from the article? (Not sure if you wanted to tag the talk page or notify the submitter either) czar 16:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed article on Yehuda Atai

Hi David, Following your decline and suggestions of the draft for the proposed page 'Yehuda Atai', we have added links to further evidence the reception of Dr. Atai's books in the Israeli media, and for some of the participants in the recent symposium on his philosophical writing, who are themselves well established in Israel's cultural and intellectual life. We have also added more references about the reception and discussion of his political work. There are quite a lot of links to Dr. Atai's appearances on radio and TV relating to his poetry and to his activism. I hope the improvements are sufficient for you to accept it: I am resubmitting it. Many thanks and happy new year. Very best, (Mark Joseph (talk) 18:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Request on 19:35:33, 27 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by BChezzHuman

BChezzHuman (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Daniel N. Baker (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you clarify notability requirements for Draft:Daniel_N._Baker?

Per the cited official source, he holds the Distinguished Professor title at University of Colorado Boulder, and therefore should qualify under WP:PROF, unless Wikipedia don't consider UCB to be a "major university". Is the latter the issue? UCB is in the top-50 in the respected Shanghai Index of universities internationally, and also in the Wikipedia list of US research institutions. Did UCB not make the "major university" cut, or was there another issue? If UCB is considered not a "major university" despite its Shanghai Index ranking, can WP provide guidance on where the cut-off it, approximately?

If WP doesn't accept that he hold Distinguished Prof title at major research university, then he should qualify based on his h-index. He has a lot of Google scholar publications, but hasn't set up a profile. Google scholar searches should not be cited (probably because Google doesn't allow archiving). There are non-profiles on ResearchGate that could be used to establish his h-index & citation count. Judging from the number of citations on Wikipedia alone, it will be very high. Will adding a citation to one of these sources be helpful, or is it a separate issue?

BChezzHuman (talk) 19:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Random AfD question...

Hello! I've got a random question for you – do you have any idea why this isn't showing up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Television, etc.? I'm trying to figure out if I'm doing something wrong with my use of the {{Delsort}} template... Thanks in advance! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So, do listings have to be done manually then? – using {{Delsort}} doesn't list it for you automatically? (TIA...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IJBall Often it will be listed (automatically, that is, I myself always list it automatically) but at times and I suspect when it never went through completely, it may not be listed. I've also been noticing a few more timing troubles here at WP recently (particularly at AfC). Cheers,

SwisterTwister talk

03:07:19, 28 December 2015 review of submission by Gast2011

Gast2011 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Stefan Gandler (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister: I included several in-depth third-party sources and made, in general, the text more precise. If you have any other question, please ask me. Gast2011 (talk) 03:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your AFC Accept process

Hi SwisterTwister, I've noticed quite a few new article acceptances by you, using the AFCH script, have been incomplete. The Accept routine of the script seems to fail - it doesn't add WikiProject banners to the Talk page and it doesn't clean up the AFC templates and related bits and pieces from the article page itself nor does it add any article categories. Here are a couple of examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dimini%C4%87i&oldid=696958645 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_NWA_Smoky_Mountain_Wrestling_alumni&oldid=696399468 - The result is that some (all?) of your "Accepts" are ending up in Category:Pending AfC submissions in article space where I find them and then try to clean them up. Are you definitely using the current version of the script? Does it never give you an error message when accepting a submission? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Dodger67: several of us have tried to draw ST's attention to this. My hypothesis is that they run too fast, not allowing the process to complete before closing the tab with the script running in it. I have seen this happen before when a reviewer is working very quickly and becomes impatient to get to the next draft. The script declares its own version and they seem to be using the current version. Fiddle Faddle 12:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Dodger67:, @Timtrent: yup. Put me in that list of people as well.Naraht (talk) 17:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dodger67 Timtrent I never get any "error" message and everything seems to work aside from that. I've also noticed the reviewing bar will not work with some and I have to wait until later or if someone else reviews that particular draft. I've noticed it definitely seems I'm not the only one experiencing this. SwisterTwister talk 18:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed you are not the only one. You simply seem to suffer it most often. There are no error messages shown when this happens. This is why I am suggesting that you may close the window or tab in which you are reviewing too quickly. It appears that the helper script requires the tab to be open for the entirety of the processing it needs to perform, or the processing is truncated.

If you notice a repeatable issue with the script it would be a kindness to report it on the relevant discussion page, though. Such issues are 'not working' Fiddle Faddle 18:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Franziskus Hennemann

New Notes William Eric Brown, Philippe Denis, Mark James. It's ok? --91.16.146.83 (talk) 16:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03:05:58, 29 December 2015 review of submission by DwayneJAlexander

DwayneJAlexander (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Andrew Howard Barnes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Happy Holidays SwisterTwister, Thanks for the pointer. I have now upgraded the independent references significantly . Please let me know if its moved in teh right direction.

All the best DwayneJAlexander (talk) 03:05, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04:46:16, 29 December 2015 review of submission by Rachita188

Rachita188 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Spykar Lifestyle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

19:29:36, 29 December 2015 review of submission by Helkins

Helkins (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Andreas Borgeas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi. I am not asking for a re-review, I guess I am asking to be pointed in the correct direction. I was told that I need more third-party independent references-- would articles in our local newspaper count? Should I provide multiple articles for certain items in the article? I guess I am looking for more guidance. I would like to know what is correct and what needs to be enhanced in order to get the article approved. Is there also an article in the same category that I should use as a model or example? Many articles that I have pulled up do not seem to fit the notability requirements.

Thanks in advance for all the help you can provide. It is much appreciated.

Hello,

Hitwicket

I submitted an Article "Hitwicket" which you recently reviewed. Hitwicket is the biggest online cricket strategy game. It has been covered in articles by The Hindu, The Economic Times, The Business Line, The Bangalore Mirror and the like which are independent reliable sources. The user community of Hitwicket is the strongest that any online game can possibly have. It is very rare that through an online game users have met, become friends and have hosted meet ups across the country to discuss about the game. Meet ups have been held not just pan India but in several other countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh etc.

Hitwicket is a notable game for cricket and strategy followers, which is easy to conclude from our more than 0.3 million registered user base.

Request you to please advise changes for the article so that it can be included in wiki. We have provided reliable citations from reliable publications. Also, we have a lot of coverage in other online platforms like sportskeeda, yourstory but I did not include them in the article.

I am providing online coverage links for your reference here to help you gauge the popularity of the game.

http://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/t20-management-game-hitwicket-cricket
http://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/hitwicket-com-hyderabads-gift-world-cricket-gaming
http://www.similarweb.com/website/hitwicket.com#overview
http://www.startupranking.com/hitwicket
http://www.nextbigwhat.com/octathorpe-secures-funding-from-the-chennai-angels-297/
http://inc42.com/flash-feed/chennai-angels-invests-in-hitwicket/

(Keertisingh25 (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC))[reply]

review of submission by Radi.iba

Dear David,

My submission for the article on Runa Khan was denied for lack of enough reliable sources. I have updated the article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Runa_Khan

Can you let me know if it is still lacking? I added references from porminent newspapers of Bangladesh, Spain, Sri Lanka and UK, USA.

Radi.iba (talk) 04:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)radi.iba[reply]

Articles for creation: PeerJ Computer Science

Thank you for the suggestions on adding more references to satisfy the academic journal notability guidelines. Have added the indexing service DBLP which indexes all major or important computer science journals. In addition to the OCLC indexing service (see infobox), this should satisfy "criteria 1" of the notability guidelines. Additionally, several other independent references have been added.

Woodleymode (talk) 11:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:52:05, 30 December 2015 review of submission by Marisaadams

Marisaadams (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lumos Learning (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your review and comments. I have added additional resources for the Lumos Learning Draft.

16:38:39, 31 December 2015 review of submission by Savdhill

Savdhill (talk · contribs)
- Draft:American Leprosy Missions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have done more research, adding several more independent, third-party sources. In general, American Leprosy Missions has a long and rich history of more than 100 years fighting a fascinating disease. It helped form Carville, the famous leprosy hospital in Louisiana, and pioneered life-changing drug treatments and the world’s first leprosy-specific vaccine. Its "Pete the Pig" piggy banks are still being sold on eBay. And its award-winning staff have dozens of publications in peer-reviewed journals. I would argue that American Leprosy Missions is at least as notable as the following non-profit organizations, and that I have provided far more independent, third-party sources and citations than can be found on their Wikipedia pages:

Compassion International https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compassion_International 75% of the references are from Compassion International itself. Is it notable only because of its size? Is there a revenue threshold for non-profit notability?

World Relief https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Relief Not one independent, third-party reference.

The Leprosy Mission https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Leprosy_Mission The vast majority of the references are directly related to The Leprosy Mission. Is this organization more notable because it’s older than American Leprosy Missions? Because it’s larger geographically?

Tear Fund https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tearfund Fewer references than American Leprosy Missions.

IDRI https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infectious_Disease_Research_Institute Only three references.

SIM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serving_In_Mission Only two, internal references.

ALERT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALERT_(medical_facility) No references.

MAP International https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAP_International Only five of 20 references are from independent sources.

Does there need to be more information about American Leprosy Missions’ current projects?

Thank you so much for your help!

Savdhill (talk) 16:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly reminder

Great work as always! Just remember to mark your CSD pages as patrolled. :) JTtheOG (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 03:24:49, 1 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Nadir Usman Ishaq

Nadir Usman Ishaq (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Strategic Plans Division Force, Pakistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! Thank you for your feedback on my article but unfortunately that's all I could provide in the article. This is due to the fact that all public information relevant to this force is provided through Inter Services Public Relations (the press department of Pakistan's military) and this department hasn't got any official site. The other source is research work of military officer who happened to work in force's parent department. These are only authentic sources I found. Nadir Usman Ishaq (talk) 03:24, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On {{Archive top}}

Hi, SwisterTwister! Just a quick reminder – when using {{Archive top}}, make sure you place the template below the discussion page topic header (e.g. from the documentation: Place the {{Archive top}} template below the header containing the discussion...). I think I noticed that you placed it above the topic header a couple of times at ANI recently... And thanks for your recent help at AfD!! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ST. An example of what IJB is talking about can be seen here. When I had to reopen the thread about the troll I had to go to the discussion above it to remove the top part of archiving. It is possible that closing threads that way might confuse the archiving as well. I hope that you have a stupendous 2016. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 23:11, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It actually occurred to me now IJBall and MarnetteD. Cheers as always!! SwisterTwister talk 23:14, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good deal ST. Happy editing whenever possible :-) MarnetteD|Talk 23:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

afc

See my comment. DGG ( talk ) 07:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DGG That's what I thought so I accepted it....what about Craig Spence (archaeology)? SwisterTwister talk 07:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

will depend on the publications & needs at least a link to his institutional page. I will check tomorrow. DGG ( talk ) 07:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion

Requesting you to revisit the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EFileCabinet, per sources presented therein. Thanks! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13:20:43, 2 January 2016 review of submission by 95.210.106.179

95.210.106.179 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Joey Shaw (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

hello SwisterTwister, as suggested by wikipedia I asked some more help with the live chat to better understand and to learn how to write the article in the right way. I had this answer back, please help me if you have time to find a way to write as you request to get approved. Thank you again for your time:

hello there, I'd like to ask for some help about a draft that I just posted and it's been rejected. searching on the web, the topic of my post is much more relevant that many other photographers published in wikipedia, but I keep having back the message that something is missing. GreenStork03 please is there anyone who's interested to suggest me what to do or even better to help me get published with this article. thank you for your time. Here's the link to the draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Joey_Shaw +myrcx GreenStork03, I'll have a look :) GreenStork03 thank you so much ← osira has quit (Remote host closed the connection) ← mythlord has quit (Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client) ← Mc|ZzzZ has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) +myrcx GreenStork03, hmmm I can see it's quite well referenced now GreenStork03, in the decline message at the top, do you see the link "ask the reviewer"? GreenStork03 yes, I do and I asked but nothing came back yet +myrcx Ah okay one moment +myrcx GreenStork03, I would wait for a response to that, because it's not obvious to me exactly why it wasn't approved

AfD

Requesting you to revisit the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil Paul, per sources presented therein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hi SwisterTwister: I have reopened the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil Paul per WP:NACD. I have provided a detailed rationale in a comment at the discussion page. I noticed that in your close you stated, " I still question its notability, I'll let this stay for now and renominate later if needed". In your nomination, you state " I question whether this article is independently notable and improvable", but as per WP:NRVE subject/topic notability is not based upon the state of sourcing within articles. It seems possible that you're basing the subject's notability based upon the state of sourcing in the article, rather than the availability of reliable sources about the subject. Also, you seem to be under the impression that topic notability is somehow aligned with articles needing to be improved, which I have noticed in other AfD discussions, but this is not the case. Many Wikipedia articles are in various incomplete states of existence, but this does not qualify them for deletion. Check out WP:DEL-REASON for some examples of valid deletion rationales.

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronn Lucas, you closed the discussion stating "The result was Keep as this seems notable and acceptable for now (NAC)". In case you're unaware of it, see WP:NTEMP, "Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." Your wording "seems notable and acceptable for now" implies that notability may fade somehow, but this is not the case, and goes against the grain of WP:NTEMP.

Just so you know, my intention here is not to berate you, but it seems that you may not be aware of some of the specifics of the guidelines. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14:32:45, 3 January 2016 review of submission by Dennis-Elliott

Dennis-Elliott (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Dennis Elliott (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have 12 State Championship Titles from 2 States and a National Champion Title in Fiddling/Banjo/Mandolin. All Verifiable. I have been mentioned in two Music History Books from Louisiana. All Verifiable. What is missing? This should be all the credentials necessary to be included in Wikipedia! I believe that I have met the Wikipedia Criteria.

Request on 20:56:23, 3 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by MaudeG3

MaudeG3 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Trans* (LGBT*) Ageing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please give precise examples of where you see problems with the tone or NPOV. It could be useful in our "original research" on homophobic and sexist discrimination in Wikipedia, one of the many many many examples of the topics that get taged "not neutral" because they are not "dominant" (the true meaning of "objectivity"). MaudeG3 (talk) 20:56, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Footballer articles

Hi, I had a look not long after this - all seemed notable. Giant Snowman 12:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - again, all look notable, although most are in awful condition. Keep sending them though! Giant Snowman 18:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bingo. Giant Snowman 19:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15:38:24, 4 January 2016 review of submission by MasepMB1357

MasepMB1357 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Intoxalock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you tell me what other sources of information I could use? I feel like I provided some in-depth 3rd party resources here and am not sure what else to do to improve.

20:26:05, 4 January 2016 review of submission by Tnetrpm

Tnetrpm (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Tailored Label Products (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello User:SwisterTwister,

I respectfully disagree with the review of this page and its references. There are numerous, reputable sources that make 'Tailored Label Products' a noteworthy business. News coverage from multiple media networks and honorable mention from the Wisconsin state Governor back up that claim.

Additional citations can be included but I do not feel it is necessary given the neutrality of the content and the credibility of the sources provided.

Please take a moment to re-review this submission. I would greatly appreciate it!

Thank you!

Sincerely, User:Tnetrpm

MFD

It looks like you forgot to sign a bunch of MFD nominations so they are all falling to Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion#January_1.2C_1970 since there's no date stamp. It would be faster if you did that than me trying to put in unsigned notices and the bot will then move them. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Request to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huntley Fitzpatrick per sources presented there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 02:46:03, 5 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Filtrate

Filtrate (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lyla Rye (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing my submission on the Canadian artist, Lyla Rye. I am asking you to reconsider your rejection of this post. Lyla Rye does meet criteria of notability within the context of her profession. The numerous publications about her work verify this. The artist is also at least as notable as her peers who have entries on Wikipedia; I am worried about standards on Wikipedia being inconsistently applied. Finally, its important to build up the number of Canadian artist entries on Wikipedia, especially notable Canadian women artists. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely xx

Filtrate (talk) 02:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

07:44:32, 5 January 2016 review of submission by Anna Kharkova

Anna Kharkova (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Rostislav Krimer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister,

The page we kindly ask you to re-review is the english translation of the existing page on the russian version of Wikipedia, which is there for more than 5 years.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Кример,_Ростислав_Олегович

Since your last review I changed the structure to make it better now and included more links even.

I kindly hope that it can be accepted by you now as it is and happy to hear your suggestions.

Best, Anna

I have written a comment at User talk:Anna Kharkova. --Hegvald (talk) 08:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SwisterTwister,

Thanks a lot for your comment. I have done necessary changes. Hope it is fine now! Best wishes, Anna

12:19:00, 5 January 2016 review of submission by Sujaydeo

Sujaydeo (talk · contribs)
- Draft:BMGI (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, I have updated the article as per your comments. I have tried to remove all the promotional part. I have also increased the number of references. Your help will be highly appreciated.

Fort Worth, Texas magazine deletion

Thanks for reviewing my page. I added another source. I'm curious how I don't have enough when I have 8 different news sources that mention our publication? Fwtxmag (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Consuelo H. Wilkins

You marked Draft:Consuelo H. Wilkins as "under review" some days ago. Do you intend to review it? If not, maybe you could mark it as pending again? Huon (talk) 19:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nominations

Hey SwisterTwister. Regarding your message on IRC (didn't get to it quickly enough to reply!), thought you might be interested to know why I've been nominating loads of articles recently. My method has been to open up Category:Articles with a promotional tone, pick a random category, and go through a handful of pages nominating anything that doesn't seem like it should be here, and G11'ing anything that definitely shouldn't be here. It's quite therapeutic. Sam Walton (talk) 20:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04:25:51, 6 January 2016 review of submission by Breamk

Breamk (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Queenie Muriel Francis Adams (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Sources from the British Medical Journal, the British Journal of Homeopathy, and Homeopathy were added. Is your rejection something against British Journals as not being reliable or Homeopathy? There would seem to fall under the category as reliable independent sources but based on the repeated denials despite the addition of repeated sources, we have just received a repeated denial. Is there something else that is not being addressed that may be a bias in and of itself in the review? thank you for your consideration.

Breamk, the style of the article makes it harder to recognize the possible notability . Try condensing it a little, and writing in a style more like an objective encyclopedia article than a tribute. DGG ( talk ) 19:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:53:16, 6 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Meltio

Meltio (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Emre Arolat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello I tried to include some more info with citing from a book as well. I would really appreciate it a lot if you could kindly have a look. Thanks!

Meltio (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Request to revisit the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libbi Bosworth per sources presented therein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Request to revisit the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidya Shah per sources presented there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Slide (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slide. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: M. M. De Voe

Hello SwisterTwister, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of M. M. De Voe, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Far too many other people have edited for G5 to apply. The awards claimed are probably enough for A7, so let the PROD run. . You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ged UK 12:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brite Winter page Declined

SwisterTwister, I appreciate you reviewing my page. I understand that I did not have enough sources for my page to be accepted. I have since added more web pages as references. These sources include blog sites, local news websites and smaller local promotional websites. Are these the types of sites credible enough? I currently have 20 of them. Is that enough references? Is the issue with the quality of the references or amount of them? I can add more before you get around to reviewing it if that is not enough. Manthey8989 (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Manthey8989: The article simply still needs any more available solid in-depth third-party sources overall. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 20:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Old AfD multi template

Note that when adding AfD links to the {{Old AfD multi}} template on article talk pages, it is typically necessary to add the full title for the deletion discussion. The link you added directed to the first deletion discussion in 2006 (diff). I have corrected the matter (diff). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep of Jonathan Mitchell

AfD's must be kept open for 7 days per wp:AfD please revert your changes. CombatWombat42 (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CombatWombat42 Actually no, they can be closed if the consensus seems clear and the majority of comments said "keep". Before considering nominating, consider alternatives to talk about any current troubles. SwisterTwister talk 21:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User:1derthere/Kollel Chatzos

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:1derthere/Kollel Chatzos, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I don't see any reason that this would meet G6. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boom Boom Kid

Hi, SwisterTwister !. I put the template Fast Erase because exite in other Wikipedias, pages about Boom Boom Kid (here, here and here) and that prove that is a band and his singer Carlos Rodriguez, also bears the alias that name, so I would ask please that the page bleach, and that I have accurate information to prove it. Thank you for your time forgive the inconvenience to. Greetings!!! Adriel ricardo morales (talk) 23:24, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20:30:52, 8 January 2016 review of submission by Pinkstart

Pinkstart (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Pinkstart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I saw my submission was declined. The comment says only: "Still not enough in-depth third-party sources overall". I included 15 references, and checked that all of them have previous references in other articles on Wikipedia, so I figured out there were "reliable" sources. I compared with already published articles of other crowdfunding platforms, and it's pretty similar. Is there an objective measure, so I can be sure it's ok before re-submitting it. Thanks in advance.

Pinkstart But there are not enough solid in-depth third-party sources overall to solidly satisfy the listed notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 20:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

deletion discussion

On October 4, 2015 you called for deletion of the living bio Edmund Keli'i Silva, Jr. On October 5, 2015 Brad Courcelles deleted the page. I had attempted to edit the page to no avail.

The Kingdom's attorney sent an email requesting clarification and explanation but received no response, so I am following up with a request for a deletion review.

Alie James 20:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Aliejames Actually Edmund Keli'i Silva, Jr. was deleted by a bot after Edmund Keli'i Silva Jr. was deleted by "blanked and or requested by article author". Would you clarify? As I have no memory of ever tagging the article for deletion or even encountering it frankly. SwisterTwister talk 20:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct about the 2nd Wiki page, but for the first one put up on October 4, On the proposed 2nd deletion of the 1st wikipage created, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Edmund_Keli%E2%80%99i_Silva_Jr._%282nd_nomination%29

you said "delete for now".

Alie James 22:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

22:19:54, 8 January 2016 review of submission by DatGuy

DatGuy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Phil Dumontet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! You commented that the article 'still needs any more available in-depth third-party sources overall about him and his work from sources such as news, magazines and journals.' The references include sources like Entrepreneur Magazine, Forbes, and NBC. Any response is appreciated. Cheers, Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 22:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC) I noticed you're on-wiki but not replying. Hopefully you get an echo notification now if you previously didn't Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 09:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23:57:51, 8 January 2016 review of submission by 206.248.171.204

206.248.171.204 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ionospheric Ionization Temperature (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Conceptual terminology that describes an inferred parameter that requires at least a university level background in semiconductor physics or electrical engineering. Please detail the type of additional information you are requesting and be explicit. Without the preliminary definition, it will be difficult to improve the article other than including the empirical data. Thank you.

01:33:35, 9 January 2016 review of submission by Shahhassanch

Shahhassanch (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Dr Fazeela Abbasi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please review this submission as the important links have also been added to show the notability of the person.

Review of submission by wfmcdade

Hello SwisterTwister,

I do not understand your comment that "(I) do not adequately show the subject's notability". There is a page on Wikipedia titled "List of the deadliest firefighter disasters in the United States". That article states that "Below is a list of the deadliest firefighter disasters in the United States, in which more than five firefighters died.". (I have already edited that page to include a reference to this disaster). In the article I submitted, 8 firefighters died. How can this not be notable, given that the other articles are?

I also do not understand why I need to improve the subject's referencing. I have included three references: newspaper articles from 1882, 1912 and 1963. What else do I need?

Thank you for your help.

Regards,

Bill McDade

What does this mean?

I got a notification that said: "The page Nadja West was reviewed by SwisterTwister." What does that mean? It's a page I'd been working on at the time. Wii Willie Wiki 02:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WiiWillieWiki - It simply means that an experienced editor took a look at the article, and found no problems with it. (talk page stalker) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

00:39:22, 9 January 2016 review of submission by Inazo1862

Inazo1862 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Appi Kogen Ski Resort (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. As per requested, I have added more third party references, including CNN, Nikkei, and Sydney Morning Herald etc. Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Inquiry Regarding Pomeroy Article

Greetings, Swister Twister! I've been working on an article. I have used an accepted article for Chef Jose Garces as a guide for my contribution for Chef Naomi Pomeroy. I have received a couple of rejections for my Pomeroy draft. The first rejection noted that I had established Pomeroy's notability but had used a promotional tone (link to draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Naomi_Pomeroy). I really valued hearing this feedback and removed promotional language (I have also removed the name of Pomeroy's restaurants to avoid promotional tone there). I resubmitted the article with a more neutral tone; I have been rejected again due to my inability to establish Pomeroy's notability with sources. My references are more in number and similar in style/genre/medium to those used for the Jose Garces article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jose_Garces

I feel as if I'm receiving conflicting information from the editing process. Any advice you can give would be greatly appreciated. Please let me know what questions you may have. I thank you for your time and consideration. MagdalenaKillionMagdalenaKillion (talk) 04:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like I might be receiving conflicting information from the editors. Any advice you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

Request on 06:55:44, 9 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by 95.119.230.182

95.119.230.182 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Inverse Warburg Effect (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

95.119.230.182 (talk) 06:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ROMAN ZADOROV

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Roman_Zadorv Hi there, I made major changes, to address you critique, primarily added inline references. I have no idea how to fix the typo in the main heading "ROMAN ZADOROV". Please help. Thannks, jz

DJ Revitalise found new sources - waiting for page to be reviewed

Hi there swister twister. I am creating an article on a music producer and dj. DJ Revitalise I have found new sources now, so i'm waiting for page to be reviewed again. thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:DJ_Revitalise&redirect=no

Musicblogger2015 (talk) 16:07, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Music blogger[reply]

Huh?

Hey Swister,

Thanks for letting me know that Draft:Lonnie Bruce White was declined as an AFC article, but unfortunately (and I don't how this happened) I didn't actually create it. All I did is previously decline it and copy-edit and sort out all the mangled mess of references (because I do believe that AFC reviewers should at least attempt to help with articles they declined if they think it has got legs). Again, I don't know how this happened, but you might want to let Friends of Luck, the actual creator of the article know! jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah Jcc it seems what happened to you is the frequency of AfC sending it to another user (often the user who submitted it for the author). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 19:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Jcc: It depends on how the {{AFC submission}} template is added to the draft. At Draft:Lonnie Bruce White, the template reads {{AFC submission|||ts=20160110155930|u=Jcc|ns=118}}, so if the draft receives any feedback resulting from the submission (acceptance, decline, comment), it will go to you. You can submit a draft on behalf of someone else by using the AFCH script, clicking the blue "Submit" button, selecting "Submit as someone else", and pasting in the name of the article's author. That way, they'll get the feedback instead of you. /wiae /tlk 21:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SwisterTwister: @Wiae: I didn't actually even submit it on Luck's behalf, or even mean to submit anything anyway! Anyhow, I had a look back and for some really weird reason I can't explain, when Friends of Luck inserted the {{subst:submit}} it didn't actually substitute until I edited the article 2 hours later, and so substed it into my name. You can have a look here. Thanks! jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcc: Oh wow, I missed the {{subst:submit}} that was originally there but hidden inside the malformed ref tag! That is weird. Apologies if you already knew all that stuff above. /wiae /tlk 21:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20:05:11, 10 January 2016 review of submission by TimeMist

TimeMist (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Carlos Collazo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello and thank you for your review and guidance. Also, Happy New Year! By way of background, I am making an effort, as a new participant in Wikipedia, to address notable people articles that have either been poorly addressed in the past or deserve that we provide factual information about their accomplishments and contributions. To that end, my first effort has been Mr. Carlos Collazo. I appreciate your help in making this article that best that I can. Some challenges that I am experiencing:

1. I removed the PR references per your suggestion and I am trying to cite the ones that are in published news or magazines. There are many. I don't know which news articles are from 'acceptable' sources and which are not. Is there a list that I may refer to?

2. Mr. Carlos Collazo provided me with some images and documents that I may use. How do I place those in the article without deletion? Do I need to get a letter from him allowing publication? One is just a picture of him.

Thank you again for your review and help. I hope you notice that I am following the guidelines as I learn them and please understand that I am new and learning.TimeMist (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You asked this question over at the help desk, and I answered and only just saw your reply (lucky I happened to be at Swister's talk anyway!). If he gave you the photographs and he owns the copyright to them, what you need to do is fire an email over to the OTRS team . Have a look here: Commons:OTRS. You need to ask Mr Collazo to email them at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the images and state that he is releasing them under a free license. It is best to use one of the templates here and modify them. The recommended licences are either CC BY-SA 4.0 (some rights reserved – attribution and sharing alike required), CC BY 4.0 (some rights reserved – attribution required) or CC0. jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:35, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jcc, thank you. I appreciate the follow up help. I am still getting used to navigating to and from Talk and/or Help. I have already contacted Mr. Collazo and he has agreed to send in to OTRS. Does that also apply for documents and presentations, etc.? TimeMist (talk) 23:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TimeMist: Hi, why do you want the documents and presentations to be uploaded to Wikimedia? You certainly can submit the documents and presentations to OTRS if you want to, but I'm not sure why you would. If you simply want to reference them you don't have to upload them. jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jcc, Hi, some documents such as white papers or presentation materials provide a good reference supporting Mr. Collazo's contributions. For example he founded a company named DDC and licensed technology he invented to it via his older company Marsys. A third party white paper was written and published about DDC and these technologies. In order to explain the relative links of this contribution from Mr. Collazo (which altered the way pharmaceutical companies provide information to their customers to the benefit of consumers), I surmise that it would be useful to illustrate the white paper. In the case of one of the companies that were part of the Marsys Group, namely Terremark, their exists a presentation that Terremark and Marsys Group provided to the industry, created by Mr. Collazo, that shows the new value of managed services which in turn allowed Terremark to be sold for $1.4 billion in the future. This kind of notability goes hidden if not surfaced with proof such as a presentation and the fact that throughout the reference websites of the company Marsys (owned and created by Mr. Collazo) there are linkages to Terremark. I believe that the more thorough the research and access to key supporting documents, the better the subject is defined (of course, there are many documents, but I am proposing to show only a few seminal ones). I already tried to include these and they were flagged for deletion along with the images. Mainly Jcc, in reading about notability and sourcing information, I am trying to get at the more difficult but very important references and information about the subject in order to present an honest and complete picture to the reader and provide strength to the credibility of wikipedia's sourcing value. What do you think? TimeMist (talk) 19:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TimeMist: Hi TimeMist, one problem that I see with using sources that were produced by his company (the "presentation that Terremark and Marsys Group provided to the industry, created by Mr. Collazo"), is that they would be primary sources and not useful for determining Mr Collazo's notability, and hence, unless they are being used instead to back up a claim that you have made (e.g. "Terremark won the XYZ award in 2010 [cite company presentation]"). With regards to the "third party white paper", which sounds a lot more promising, if it isn't already online, and Mr Collazo is willing to opensource it, upload it to Wikisource as it will be a great reference to use. However, if Mr Collazo doesn't want to opensource a confidential or commercially important document, it is perfectly fine to cite something that is not on the internet, and only available as an offline source. With regards to your images being deleted, I'm sure they won't be deleted again when you reuploaded them via OTRS OR since I've just noticed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carlos M Collazo 2015.jpg the deletion nomination for the picture of Mr Collazo, put a note on that page saying that "I have asked Mr Collazo to email a confirmation to OTRS, please treat this as OTRS pending" and get Mr Collazo to email OTRS ASAP. I'm sure however, for facts such as "Terremark to be sold for $1.4 billion" you can find an independent (so not a company paper) source online or in a newspaper that states this, and can be used to demonstrate notability at the same time! Also, when you reply, can you reply on my talk page, as I'm sure Swister (hi!) must be getting pretty annoyed at our continued use of their talk page :) jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Gitner draft

I submitted a draft article for approval which is now located at User:Tilatt/sandbox. You declined it for not having enough in-depth third-party sources. I would request that you look at the article again and let me know about these - (1) [39] This article in the Sun Sentinel is one of many that are in-depth about the subject. The topic of the article was covered by numerous other publications but should only be counted as a single reference since it is about the same topic. (2) There are a total of 10 articles that you can find archived on Newspapers.com that date back to 1984 [40]. These are not as in-depth as some of the newer references, but they verify his positions with numerous airlines. (3) He is discussed in-depth for his role in aviation in several books, including "Hard Landing: The Epic Contest for Power and Profits," "Charismatic Leadership in Organizations," "Marketing & Media Decisions," "Deregulation and Competition," and "Grounded." (4) If you search Google Books [41], you will see him in publications such as Businessweek, Texas Monthly, Venture, and Forbes. (4) Here is an in-depth article in The New York Times [42] from 1981 about his founding of People Express Airlines. (5) Here is one in Business Travel News about him becoming CEO for TWA [43]. (6) Here is one from years later in The Washington Post [44] where the union of the employees wanted him ousted.

Basically, I see these all as in-depth, especially the article from The New York Times, the books, and several others that can be found in a basic online search. Please reconsider the article submitted and let me know what, if anything, I need to do. I added these references to the draft, but not sure if they are in the correct place. --Tilatt (talk) 23:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:45:31, 11 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Mag2020

Mag2020 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mario A. Guerra (Politician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Mag2020 (talk) 06:45, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I submitted an article related to Mario A. Guerra and the reviewer noted it was an autobiography. It is not an autobiography as I am not Mario A. Guerra.

The guidelines seem clear that as a current high ranking member of the California Republican Party (elected), Mayor of the City of Downey (second largest city I LA County) and published author, Mr. Guerra should qualify as a notable. Am I missing something in order for the page to be approved? Please advise. Thank you! - Richard Garcia

10:22:16, 11 January 2016 review of submission by Lukog

Lukog (talk · contribs)
- User:Lukog/Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

'Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri' died in the year 1988 and not much about his life is online as it is not yet done in India as a common practice.I request yo to re consider his inclusion in biography section of stalwarts. Lukog

````

Request on 11:02:49, 11 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Carlalam1

Carlalam1 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kazuyoshi Miwa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! Thanks for your review. I would email you.Carlalam1 (talk) 11:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Make a second go at adminship?

Sometimes I think that you have to be one of the hardest working Wikipedians on here - you're in AfD, AfC (and oh man, do I appreciate that), and various other places. Offhand, have you ever thought about running for a second RfA? I know that your first one brought up some issues, but I think that you'd likely stand a better chance now. The two biggest issues that I saw people had against you was that your article creation counts were low and you don't really do a lot of article content work as far as expanding articles goes. However at the same time you're very active at AfD and your votes frequently match the outcome about 90% of the time, which is impressive. I figure that the main things you'll be going up against is the article creation, mainspace edits, and maybe perhaps that you lean more towards deletion at AfD. I don't think that any of those are necessarily things that should keep you from becoming an admin because in order to know what to delete you need to have a fairly good knowledge on what you should keep. You've also approved several articles via AfC that look to be on the up and up, so that could be used to argue against claims that you haven't created a ton of articles yourself or that most of your edits to the mainspace aren't you adding chunks of info to articles.

I'd say that you should make a second go of it. I'm going to ping The Blade of the Northern Lights, Kudpung, Boing! said Zebedee, DGG, and Seraphimblade. All of the above (minus DGG) commented on your userpage about the closed RfA back in 2012, so I'm tagging them to see what they think. DGG was active at the RfA and he's fairly strict on Wikipedia, but he's also incredibly fair, which has earned him the respect of many of us on here and he'd be a great resource in preparing yourself if you want to go again. I'd support you, if you're interested. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned to you (SwisterTwister) on IRC the other day, I think you stand a good chance at RfA; if you're interested in running again drop me an email and we can talk about it. Sam Walton (talk) 12:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have very much time to spare right now, but I'll be happy to have a look over things as soon as I do - probably a bit later in the week. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I didn't get back as quickly as I'd intended. My general feel is that I'd be inclined to support an RFA. However, I'm a bit disturbed by some errors you're making in speedy deletion tagging, and even more concerned that you are not responding to being told about them but are continuing to make the same errors - see my two notifications to you, below, about your apparent misunderstanding of WP:G1. I also think setting up an archive and thus making your talk page a little more accessible would be in your favour. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I supported the first time around, and have not yet seen a reason to be sorry. I can review in more depth later. As an aside, have you considered setting an archive bot on this page? It's getting a bit unwieldy to navigate. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 14:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would support this time around., on the basis that the problems I previously commented on have mostly been solved by your increased accuracy. Usually I do ask for some article creation, though not to the same absurd extent as some of the other people commenting there. But if the work is good enough without it, and especially if the help being given to the new editors is appropriate and useful -- as is the case here, -- then the purpose of requiring editing has been satisfied. But there are nonetheless inevitably going to be a number of objections on this basis, and it would be easy to satisfy them by writing a few articles from some obvious redlinks. DGG ( talk ) 21:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Conominated then, would certainly be strongly supporting now. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 21:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would support this time round. But I wish you would archive some of this talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Two things: 1) I would definitely support you if you ran! and, 2) before you run, make sure you've set up auto-archiving of your Talk page!! One other thing: if you want more feedback, be sure to drop by WP:ORCP... But, in your case, I don't even think you'll need that! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

12:32:52, 11 January 2016 review of submission by LeemingJ

LeemingJ (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Eliza and the Bear (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

I have since added more journalistic references that are independent and have also added information about radio playlist addition of the last two singles the band released. This should conform with point 11 on the notability guide for musicians and bands.

I'm keen to not have this one rejected again so if you could let me know if you feel these sources successfully prove notability of this artist and i will resubmit.

Many thanks.

Declined Username: Hastings Bella Draft:Mads Munk

Hey Swister Twister - Please advise - you have rejected our entry again for Mads Munk - we really don't understand what we can do here as we have now given 8 entirely independent editorial sources from major magazines/newspapers - no blogs or websites etc - all sources are interviews with or major quotes by the subject. We have also added in new biog info - including our subjects role as Exec producer of a major new kids movie and his role as Exec producer of a new global pop group which was the biggest record signing for 2016. These are not part of his company M2 - they are entirely new sole projects. We really don't understand what more we can do here as we feel we have fulfilled the guidelines (3 notable sources) and the biog now includes info on major music and entertainment launches our subject is involved with for 2016 separate to the other previous activity - please advise! Thanks so much

Review of submission by Swelch12 - Reference Question

Hi -

My submission was declined on December 21 because it does not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Your comment says that pages require reliable sources independent of the subject. Since I included a number of sources from publications such as Forbes, Newsweek, NBC, Desktop Engineering and Computerworld, I'm unclear as to why the submission was rejected and what I can do to correct it. Any guidance you could give me on this is greatly appreciated.

For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Artec_3D

Request on 09:20:16, 12 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Ayesha jaisinghani

Ayesha jaisinghani (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Voylla.com (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Now I well edited my article and manage well references according to your guidliness.

so now is it okey

Ayesha jaisinghani (talk) 09:20, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10:54:30, 12 January 2016 review of submission by 72.80.94.128

72.80.94.128 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Unchangeable Spots of Leopards (novel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

SwitsterTwister - Thank you for taking a look and for linking to the Books Notability guidelines. I had just added two reviews from NPR and The New Yorker, which should qualify the novel as notable re: criteria #1. I'd argue, re: #2 that the book's Honorable Mention for the PEN/Hemingway award should be considered as a literary award win. Additionally Jansma did win the Sherwood Anderson Foundation's Fiction Award for writing this novel as referenced here http://sherwoodandersonfoundation.org/current_winner/ This is a major literary award and should qualify the novel and its author as notable under the criteria specified. Thank you.

On your and LaMona's advice I have resubmitted this draft with additional reviews from secondary sources to help establish notability. There are more which could be included , but I hope that this will suffice? If there are other issues with the article, I'm eager to fix them. Thank you both for your time in helping me to understand this process better.

12:32:54, 12 January 2016 review of submission by Integrator 30

Integrator 30 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:ComCloud (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I think I proved the importance and notability of the topic. Cloud products are becoming increasingly important and when talking about IT trends cloud is unavoidable word. I belive that the content of the draft meets the guidelines of Wikipedia - contains reliable sources, contains independent sources and is important product for this part of Europe. I hope for a positive response from you! Many thanks for reading! --Integrator 30 (talk) 12:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Shugar

Thank you for reviewing my submission on Dan Shugar. I would have thought that articles written about him in Forbes magazine and the San Francisco Business Journal, as well as numerous solar industry publications and a section of a National Geographic article would verify his "notability." Should I assume that my inclusion of biographical information from Bloomberg is what is causing my problem? (My source list is below. If you could tell me which ones to replace, I will work on it!) Also, a significant source of information on the solar industry is PV (Photovoltaic) Magazine, which Wikipedia has currently blacklisted. I have requested that it be taken off the blacklist, or at least to allow on the whitelist the articles I would like to cite. If I am successful in this effort, will this help? Any other advice? Thanks. References[edit source | edit] ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Kanellos, Michael. "Flextronics: A Quiet Giant In Solar". Forbes.com. Retrieved 10 January 2016. ^ Jump up to: a b Wesoff, Eric. "1. NEXTracker CEO Dan Shugar on $330M Acquisition by Flextronics". Retrieved 10 January 2016. ^ Jump up to: a b c "Unstoppable Solar": Dan Shugar of NexTracker headlines Cleantech Open Event in Fremont". Retrieved 10 January 2016. Jump up ^ Wesoff, Eric. "NEXTracker CEO Dan Shugar on $330M Acquisition by Flextronics". ^ Jump up to: a b c "Flextronics agrees to pay $330 million for Fremont smart solar startup NEXTracker". Retrieved 10 January 2016. ^ Jump up to: a b c d "Bloomberg Private Person". Retrieved 10 January 2016. Jumpyup ^ "US Solar Market Insights". Retrieved 10 January 2016. Jump up ^ Parfit, Michael. "Future Power: Where will the world get its next energy fix?". NationalGeographic.com. Retrieved 10 January 2016. ^ Jump up to: a b c "Bloomberg Profiles". Retrieved 10 January 2016.

Thanks for your help. Mary Bufe (talk) 13:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19:46:37, 12 January 2016 review of submission by Drm310

Drm310 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lyell Gustin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister. Just wondered if because this individual received the Saskatchewan Order of Merit (highest civilian honour in the province of Saskatchewan), that might make him notable per WP:ANYBIO? That might not have been so obvious in my initial draft. I've included the post-nominal on his name.

If not, perhaps this content could be merged into the Gustin House article? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks. --Drm310 (talk) 19:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20:05:21, 12 January 2016 review of submission by 112.196.139.95

112.196.139.95 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:GenX Deals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Adr2609/Accolite

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Adr2609/Accolite, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I see no reason that this page needs to be deleted under G6 - please provide a specific reason. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jackmcbarn Actually that is applicable for the new WP:G6 which allows deletion for unused drafts with nothing but the basic article wizard content, "Deleting userspace drafts with nothing more than the default Article Wizard text if the user creating the page has not been active for at least one year". SwisterTwister talk 23:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I wasn't aware of that change. I've now deleted the page, and I also created {{db-blankdraft}} for future use to clarify the reason for this deletion. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review of "Legendary Pictures"

Hi SwisterTwister! I just wanted to bring to your attention that at 03:10, 12 January 2016 UTC you marked Legendary Pictures as reviewed, even though the page was blank at the time. The page was supposed to be a redirect, but an editor making a page move apparently removed the redirect by accident. It's been fixed now, but I just wanted to give you a heads up. Regards, – Zntrip 00:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trio Bienal

Hi SwisterTwister! Thank you for reviewing my draft. I tried to put more sources into it and external links as well. Hope the article is becoming Wiki-worth soon. --Robertsan (talk) 10:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Could you please take a look at my draft again? There are a lot of references, taken from art magazines, lifestyle-magazines, newspapers, and museum-sites. I added the names of the authors of the articles, where available. The most articles are in Portugues, not in English but I think nearly everybody can imagine the content. If you dislike some of the references, delete them. There are enough good ones, I am sure. Best regards from Austria. --Robertsan (talk) 09:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC) Here the link Draft:Trio Bienal--Robertsan (talk) 11:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Letters2Simon - week 1 - ROBLOX

Sorry, but you can't use U5 in Draft space. It's only for things in user space. I do agree that the draft should go, though. It's blatantly not encyclopaedic, but there isn't a speedy I can think of for it. Peridon (talk) 11:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft talk pages

Hello. Please do not remove relevant content from draft talk pages when you move them into mainspace (as you did at Talk:The Crown of Ptolemy for example). Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MSGJ - I'm a (talk page stalker), but I do some work at AfC. I'm not sure that Swister removed those comments. I think that perhaps it's something that happens automatically when the draft gets approved. Can't be positive, as I can't think of an example of a draft I approved which had anything on the talk page. But when I look at your example, the change to the talk page was done using the AFCH script. If so, it's something that maybe should be brought up on the AfC talk page, to make reviewers aware of in the future as something they should be on the lookout for. I know I certainly haven't been looking for it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. The script should definitely not be doing this! I'll chase it up, but a confirmation from SwisterTwister that this removal was unintentional would be helpful. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MSGJ Of course that was not intentional and that actually happened because I tagged the former Crown of Ptolemy page to allow moving the draft (see Logs) so that's why it removed the talk page contents. SwisterTwister talk 18:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not the reason actually. The removed text was part of the draft talk and not what was there previously. So it does seem to be a script error. Anyway it's now being investigated at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script. Thank you for your time — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS, please can you archive your talk page?! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MSGJ, Haha, I actually have, see the history, I last archived 55,000 bytes of it two days ago. I'm still going, bear with me.

SwisterTwister talk 20:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

<100 threads would be good ;) — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:23:39, 13 January 2016 review of submission by Zenanko

Zenanko (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Dan C. Rizzie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

13.01.2016 review of submission by Lacanada1 re EDAW (landscape architect)

I have included more references, removed a couple that may not meet the 'notability' threshold and generally tightened up the article drawing on a number of 3rd party reputable sources including leading academic journals, industry press and international newspapers that have reported on this organization/topic. Please re-consider your rejection.Lacanada1 (talk) 16:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:16:07, 13 January 2016 review of submission by Vkguf

Vkguf (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Rachel (Raya) Takserman-Krozer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Many thanks for reviewing my contribution. In my opinion I have included reliable sources in my article and in my opinion it is fulfiling the guidlines for academics at least in two points. Maybe I should move note (1) into references and include note (7) in the reference chapter. Then it would eventually become clearer. So my question is simply would it suffice? What shall be described differently? Also some links are to pages which exist only in the German version of Wikipedia. I am not aware how to link to those pages directly, so maybe this has also been contributed to the decline?

Vkguf (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05:37:35, 14 January 2016 review of submission by BeeTinkRum

BeeTinkRum (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Alesa Lajana (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there Swister Twister, this is Stephanie Rawson here. I'm part of Alesa's management team and we have been working on her Wikipedia page. I am writing to contest the rejection of the page. Alesa Lajana has been released on Australia's premier classical music label, and is working with both Grammy and ARIA winning artists (all of whom have Wikipedia pages. In addition, I think you will find that the references that my assistant provided in the writing of the page are very notable publicatiions in Australia eg. The Courier-Mail, Music Forum Magazine, WQ (Writers Queensland) Magazine, AND the National Library of Australia. If you are looking for another artist with a page that has similar references you can refer to Thelma Plum, or Shane Howard, both Australian aritsts. Is the person reviewing this in Australia?

Thank you Stephanie Rawson

06:36:33, 14 January 2016 review of submission by A.T.Gasch

A.T.Gasch (talk · contribs)
- Draft:George Burr Richardson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please note that little has been written about geologist George Burr Richardson (1872-1949), though he merits attention because he made significant contributions during his decades of work for the U.S. Geological Survey in its early days(when there were only about 12 geologists in the Survey). Richardson's contributions are outlined in the material presented. A particularly significant contribution is described in the first paragraph. I hoped to include Dr. Richardson in Wikipedia because he does warrant attention and little has been written about him.

I have cited the one publication that provides a significant amount of information about him (Richards RW. Memorial to George Burr Richardson. Proceedings Volume of the Geological Society of America Annual Report for 1951 July 1952:135-140. I would be glad to scan that piece and submit it, if desired.) Unfortunately, only brief references are made to Richardson in other material, such as mention of his appointment as a Fellow in geology to Johns Hopkins University (The American Naturalist, vol. 33, Jan. 1, 1899, p. 33.

I would very much appreciate a re-review in light of the above.

Request on 07:00:43, 14 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by A.T.Gasch

A.T.Gasch (talk · contribs)
- Draft:George Burr Richardson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I think I did not correctly submit my request for a re-review of George Burr Richardson, so here I am again. I wrote the article about Richardson (1892-1949) because little has been written about him, yet he warrants attention because of his substantive contributions to geology during his decades of work for the U.S. Geological survey during its early days (when there were only about 12 geologists in the Survey). Richardson's contributions are outlined in the article, and the first paragraph describes a prominent one. The first reference cited is the only reference I could find that has a significant amount of information about Richardson. Other material just makes a brief reference to him, such as reporting his appointment as a fellow in geology to Johns Hopkins University (The American naturalist, vol. 33, Jan. 1, 1899, p. 33). In light of this information, please do reconsider the article. I would very much appreciate that.A.T.Gasch (talk) 07:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A.T.Gasch (talk) 07:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:47:59, 14 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Wodnikprasowy

Wodnikprasowy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:International Sailing Schools Association (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwsiterTwister. In reference to your review of the International Sailing Schools Association entry. I respect your point of view. I really do, but please... in terms of your argumentation, please explain to me in your own words (without copying and pasting wikipedia policies) the difference between my entry and this entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Yachting_Association There is no reference "about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Not a single one as all come from RYA governed pages, yet they meet the notability standards. How is it possible? Is my entry being discriminated now? Im using RYA as an example because RYA and ISSA does not differ so much in life. Both exist for a long, long time and both perform similar activities. Wodnikprasowy (talk) 14:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wodnikprasowy (talk) 14:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:08:42, 14 January 2016 review of submission by Cpercival

Cpercival (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Chris Percival (Entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Additional references added regarding notability, including further information on inclusion in the top 100 UK entrepreneur ranking.

17:01:26, 14 January 2016 review of submission by Pauline1991

Pauline1991 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Thania Paffenholz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

01:59:44, 15 January 2016 review of submission by Goodwork84

Goodwork84 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Grovo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you for taking the time to review my draft article on Grovo. I'm disappointed it was declined, but looking forward to improving it.

Would you mind clarifying your comments so I can make the appropriate edits?

In your note, it states, "Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." However, I included 26 references from reliable, notable sources, including CNN Money, TechCrunch, PC Magazine, Entrepreneur Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, and more. I could include many more references from objective sources (such as Bloomberg News, The New York Times, etc.), but currently every sentence in the article already has a reference associated with it. I'm happy to list those additional sources at the end if that's helpful. Please let me know.

Thank you in advance for your help, Goodwork84 (talk) 01:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just following up to see if you can provide any additional information to guide me forward in my drafting process.

Thank you, Goodwork84 (talk) 04:46, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Goodwork84 There are several sources listed but I'm simply not sure whether it's all enough to solidly satisfy the notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03:00:07, 15 January 2016 review of submission by Kdsimph

Kdsimph (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Metro TeenAIDS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, I'm not actually requesting a re-review. The link I clicked on said I could ask you a question by clicking there. I see that you said I needed more in-depth, third-party sources. I wonder if it would be better for me to remove some of the more programmatic elements from the entry and stick to more basic facts about Metro TeenAIDS. Rather than getting more sources, would it be better to reduce the number of things that have website sources or are not cited? This is my first attempt at a Wikipedia article and I am grateful for any guidance you can give. Thank you! Kdsimph (talk) 03:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:44:08, 15 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Bloodredruby

Bloodredruby (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Carol Anne Shaw (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there. Just checking in on the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Carol_Anne_Shaw -- my first attempt at creating one.

I've added brief quotes from and references to two external reviews -- one from a newspaper and one from an academic journal. (Both accessed through a database -- so no links.) Am I on the right track? Thinking I can also try to find something to link to regarding the awards the books have won/been nominated for, although I haven't found that yet.

Thank you for your help -- I appreciate it.

Bloodredruby (talk) 06:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bloodredruby The article simply still needs any further available in-depth third-party sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

08:36:42, 15 January 2016 review of submission by Kreen89

Kreen89 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ematic Solutions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi David, Thanks for taking the time to review the Ematic Solutions article. I am trying to improve the article based on your comments, which includes defining the notability of Ematic Solutions.

I've found more independent online sources and articles to cite the content. But i would like to ask if you have other suggestions to improve the article, before I resubmit the draft for review. Cheers, Hongda

Hi David!

Thanks very much for your time and the feedback on the Draft:Stefan Günther Tweraser page - I have gone over some more press etc., and have added quite a few more sources. I can see how busy you are helping others. I was not sure if you would take another look, or if I was even smart enough to tag you properly in my reply on the submission. Anyway, thanks again for the great advice, and for your time. Philbutler (talk) 17:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent CSD tags

Hi, SwisterTwister,
I can see you've been very busy but I was just curious why you were seeking out and tagging all of these user subpages, often from users who are inactive. It doesn't seem like a very urgent task unless there are BLP or copyright violations. I can't tell you how to spend your editing time (and plenty of editors criticize how I spend mine) but I hope it is not a big effort to track down these subpages because I don't think they are harming the project unlike vandalism or attack pages. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Liz Of course but I've been helping to clean Category:Stale userspace drafts which has had over 40,000 pages and these are actually applicable for the new WP:G6, "Deleting userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text if the user who created the page has been inactive for at least one year". At best, it simply helps to clean and I enjoy it.

Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 22:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the explanation, SwisterTwister, and for your viewing my question as an inquiry and not a criticism. It's just as you go through these CSD categories there are pages you typically see and all of these user subpages stuck out as something different. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again SwisterTwister. I've been deleting a lot of your G6 nominations, and I thank you again for your efforts to clean up stale userspace drafts. Most of your nominations clearly fall under G6, but some are less clear and I see you sometimes adding G11 etc, which is great. I am curious though why you don't just tag some of the less clear cut ones under G13?--Mojo Hand (talk) 15:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mojo Hand - Because, to my knowledge, the draft has to have been rejected, "This applies to rejected or unsubmitted Articles for creation pages that have not been edited in over six months", and several of these were never actually submitted. Thanks again for deleting,

SwisterTwister talk 17:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't do too much in AFC (and thus no expert), but wouldn't these qualify as "unsubmitted"?--Mojo Hand (talk) 18:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I suppose, I can start adding G13 along with the G6 tag. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 18:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:19:16, 16 January 2016 review of submission by Lisztmacher

Lisztmacher (talk · contribs)
- Draft:R. Bruce Dold (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Actually I'm not requesting a re-review. I thought this was borderline for notability, and the subject (R. Bruce Dold) is notoriously publicity-shy, so it is very difficult to get independent sourcing on him. He is quite well known in Chicago at least, appearing on public TV and various panels, and because he shows up as a red link on a few pages, I thought it might be useful to have a page on him, even a stub. No big deal.

Lisztmacher (talk) 16:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19:26:19, 16 January 2016 review of submission by Ace librarian

Ace librarian (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Man Who Wouldn't Get Up and Other Stories (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

David Lodge is a major contemporary British author. The book I wrote about, The Man Who Wouldn't Get Up and Other Stories, is the only one listed in Lodge's Wikipedia entry that has no link/entry currently. The book is a limited edition, so it is owned by relatively few libraries (see Worldcat record: http://www.worldcat.org/title/man-who-wouldnt-get-up-and-other-stories/oclc/40801398&referer=brief_results). I own a copy and wanted to complete the information available on David Lodge's Wikipedia entry. (If it is of any interest, I am a librarian/professor at a university in NYC.) Thanks for your consideration.

{{|Ace librarian}} That draft will need further better sourcing as I mentioned though, for it to be a solidly independently notable article. SwisterTwister talk 19:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Man Who Wouldn't Get Up and Other Stories is the only book listed on the Wikipedia entry for David Lodge (a major contemporary British author) that does not currently have its own entry. I am a librarian/professor at a university library in NYC and wanted to fill this gap in the entry for Lodge. Thanks for reconsidering this.

Ace librarian (talk) 19:35, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BTW you need not submit another section, please simply respond to the existing section instead. SwisterTwister talk 19:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Potential AfD question for you

Hello SwisterTwister! I've got a question for you – I've come across an article on a failed pilot for a TV series: Members Only (TV series). It is well sourced (so passes WP:GNG, I guess). But, being just a failed pilot, it would seem to fail the WP:TVSERIES guideline. So, I'm wondering if I should take it to AfD... Any thoughts? TIA! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:51, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly IJBall, the article seems to have enough information and sourcing to be acceptable even if it was not fully accepted as a series. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 21:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21:33:07, 16 January 2016 review of submission by TimeMist

TimeMist (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Carlos Collazo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello SwisterTwister, we have done more work refining the draft article with better sources and removed PR based citations. We have submitted for review. Please advise if we can do more to make it better. We are in process of improving always and thank you for your help. TimeMist (talk) 21:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

09:14:29, 17 January 2016 review of submission by Soltesh

Soltesh (talk · contribs)
- Draft:9janimi Channel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Keep There's enough sources so far to establish notability SwisterTwister; though you might think the sources aren't perfect but notability does seem to be there, Give it a year or 2 & I'd imagine sources will improve. There are additional sources available at Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL specifically in the first link of simple web searches, that could be useful to perform Quality improvement efforts on the article.

Lets have your opinion #cc Davey2010 The Drover's Wife Cirt Soltesh (talk) 09:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sarah_Tkotsch

Hi,

the article is about a German actress. She is known from Television in Germany. In German wikipedia she has an own article. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Tkotsch

I translated this article for English Version from wikipedia. So don't know exactly what you mean if you stated that the person isn't notable enough since she has already an article in wikipedia.

Pepino2410 (talk) 09:39, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pepino2410 - Each Wikipedia has its own standards for what constitutes notability. English Wikipedia has higher standards. In this case, the two overriding guidelines would be WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Clearly this actor does not meet NACTOR, and with the current referencing, the article doesn't pass WP:GNG. We'd need at least 3 in-depth sources from independent reliable sources to meet those guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:40, 17 January 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

(talk page stalker)

I have looked at de:Sarah Tkotsch.

It claims she has appeared in de:Spuk am Tor der Zeit. There is no mention of her in that article.

It claims she has appeared in de:Good Bye, Lenin!. There is no mention of her in that article.

It claims she has appeared in de:Polizeiruf 110. There is no mention of her in that article.

A quick check all the other films and TV shows she is asserted to have appeared in brings up similar results.

Peter in Australia aka --Shirt58 (talk) 13:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

thank you both for the respective answer. Would it help to shorten the filmography?

In "Spuk am Tor der Zeit" as well as "Good bye Lenin" she played minor parts.

In "GZSZ", "In aller Freundschaft", "Dog with a Blog", "Q Pootle" she played or dubbed a main part. Of course she does not mentioned in the linked articles. These articles are about the series in general and the articles about the dubbing are the english original ones. She dubbed the German part.

It is my first article. I thought in English wikipedia I linked English version of the articles. Is this correct?

http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/fernsehen/grossartiger-tatort-aus-wien-die-hoffnung-stirbt-zuerst-11027032/kommissar-moritz-eisner-11031183.html (Tatort - regular minor role)

GZSZ http://www.rtl.de/cms/sarah-steigt-aus-345146.html http://www.gzsz-wiki.de/wiki/Sarah_Tkotsch http://www.gzsz-wiki.de/wiki/Lucy_C%C3%B6ster

In aller Freundschaft http://www.mdr.de/in-aller-freundschaft/autogramme-und-mehr/neue-staffel106.html https://www.google.de/?gws_rd=ssl#q=in+aller+freundschaft+sarah+tkotsch&start=10

Hund mit Blog (Dog with a Blog) http://www.picturepuzzlemedien.de/news/alles-neu-macht-mai-sarah-tkotsch-sorgt-sachsenklinik-attraktive-verstaerkung-im https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hund_mit_Blog (See Synchronisation)

Q Pootle http://programm.ard.de/?sendung=2800816784892766&first=1 (See Besetzung)

Spuk am Tor der Zeit http://www.cinema.de/film/spuk-am-tor-der-zeit,1312184.html

but these are German sources since she is a German actress and voice actress. Could I use these in English Wikipedia? My intention was to link to English Versions within Wikipedia that English users can inform about the respective projects.

Is that the wrong way?

Please don't get me wrong. I would not claim about the fact that the article was declined. I am just not sure if German sources help in English wikipedia or if it is better to shorten the article and only write about the main projects.

What would you suggest?

Pepino2410 (talk) 16:34, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can't understand this decission, related former actors from GZSZ have articels, for instance: Janina Uhse, Sandra Keller (actress) (both with only german sources (besides imdb)). In my opinion, I don't think that the englisch wikipedia has higher standards as the german one ;) --Tkkrd (talk) 07:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User:BernsteinAndriulli/Bernstein & Andriulli

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:BernsteinAndriulli/Bernstein & Andriulli, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I know we've expanded G6, but I don't think this one is a G6 speedy, not spammy enough for G11 - needs MfD. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 15:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TouchLay

I've declined this (and several other of your recent nominations) for speedy deletion. Although I don't really disagree with deleting it, it is clearly not a technical deletion. It is not just the article wizard template, there is actually an article written there. I suggest that in cases like this you either send it to MFD or mark it with the AFC template and let it time out as a G13. SpinningSpark 20:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spinningspark - I've been discussing a similar issue up above. Wouldn't this page (and similar ones) already qualify for G13 as old unsubmitted drafts?--Mojo Hand (talk) 20:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, not unless they are marked with the AFC project template. Which is why I suggested the solution is template them with AFC. SpinningSpark 20:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dinesh mudichur page

Thanks for reviewing my page again.i need to add more info can I edit it.User talk:SwisterTwister thank you.can u please give me special edit status for my page mudichur that I created.thanks for everything — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshyazz (talk • contribs) 06:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

07:00:56, 18 January 2016 review of submission by Roshni3423

Roshni3423 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The 120 Media Collective (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister!

Thank you for reviewing my Draft:The 120 Media Collective. Had left a message on your talk page in reference to this. I've read the rules and added references from legitimate news websites and press sources to add to the subject's notability. Have deleted a bunch of it due to previous declined submissions. What would you suggest be added in terms of notability? Have mentioned awards won and the sources are all verifiable too. Would a table of awards work?

Cheers! Roshni3423 (talk) 07:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Star Gazers

Swister Twister, did you start the page for the 2016 season of "Star Gazers" (the astronomy show)? I was rather surprised to see it. I've been working on the episode listings for that show for a number of years now. There was once another person who worked on "Star Gazers" as well; but, he has since retired from Wikipedia (so, I had been "going it solo" ever since). I'm glad to see new interest in the TV show. Brianhass (talk) 00:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Christine Holmberg

First of all, I'd like to say thank you for reviewing several of my pages that I started, Metalheads, Rising Falcon Cinema, and Gregory Cahill. Secondly, I'd like to start a page called Lisa Christine Holmberg, but it seems that I can't due to former deletions. I've found ten notable newspaper articles in my research to reference on the page, which exceeds the necessary four or five sources to prove basic notability. Not to mention that the page is already referenced on another Wikipedia page. How should I proceed? Thank you for your time. WikiConqueror (talk) 04:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiConqueror Hmm, frankly, it would depend whether it now better satisfies WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SwisterTwister It does. I'm just unsure how to create the page since it seems to be somewhat protected. WikiConqueror (talk) 05:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiConqueror One path is WP:Articles for creation, where third-party users including myself (I'm a reviewer) can review it before accepting it or not. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SwisterTwister Okay, thanks! I'll do that. WikiConqueror (talk) 05:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SwisterTwister I submitted the article Lisa Christine Holmberg. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! WikiConqueror (talk) 07:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:BlackBerry Soul Radio

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:BlackBerry Soul Radio, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: no AfC template, so not within G13. Thank you.

This does not come within the definition of G13, which says "any userspace drafts and drafts in the Draft: namespace that are using the project's {{AFC submission}} template" (my emphasis). I don't know why that qualification was added, but unless there is consensus to remove it, abandoned drafts like this one must either go to MfD or simply be left alone. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JohnCD - I think the difference is that these drafts are under an older AFC process. I can't think of a good reason why G13 shouldn't be expanded to include these drafts as well. Can you? I'm considering raising this at WT:CSD.--Mojo Hand (talk) 16:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JohnCD. I use G13 on these--I read it more inclusively, exactly the same way as SwisterTwister does. I think that was the intent of the rule. I'm very reluctant to use anything like IAR at Speedy, but this is simply a technical problem in the wording. I support ST's use of G13, and I delete any such nominated article I see.

But to eliminate ambiguity, see my proposed change at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13 Drafts - [45] DGG ( talk ) 17:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the reason for the words "that are using the project's {{AFC submission}} template" in G13, but they are there, I assume for a purpose; part of the compromises when G13 was first agreed? I have commented at WT:CSD that I'm happy to see them removed. JohnCD (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G1 speedy deletion again

Hi. You have tagged a number of user space pages with WP:G1 again, despite my having previously explained your errors in doing so. Firstly, if a page is written in readable English then it is not applicable for G1. Secondly, G1 does not apply to user space pages anyway. Please read the speedy deletion criteria properly and please stop tagging readable English user pages with G1. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft deletions

As I recently told you, every single one of your G13 nominations is being posted in incorrect format. Please learn how to do it. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To actually explain the issue, Template:Db-g13 states that you need to add the |ts= parameter to indicate when the page was last constructively edited. Sam Walton (talk) 17:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies: I should also have said that. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G6

I do not think I would use G6 on userspace drafts as an additional reason, U5 is sufficient (but I do add G11 sometimes to the worst of them to prevent it being restored on request) DGG ( talk ) 17:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dave!

If you haven't noticed, I'll add it as a "non-controversial housekeeping" and also for the new G6 which would be applicable, "Deleting userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text if the user who created the page has been inactive for at least one year". Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Around the World by Horse Drawn Caravan

I've done more research online and added in more sources from multiple newspaper reports, let me know if there's enough for the article to be published. Thanks Fsmgrant (talk) 22:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry about speedy deletion of Lanwar

I missed the notification about this being nominated for speedy deletion. I have no idea what was on the page that made it look like advertising. Would it be possible for me to see the deleted page contents? Sparr (talk) 09:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13:23:24, 25 January 2016 review of submission by Bodysurfinyon

Bodysurfinyon (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Large scale brain networks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing my article. Can you give me some guidance as to how much context I need to provide? I strongly believe this is a hugely important topic and it might take a while to make it something that a lay person could understand. My hobby has bee reading books about consciousness for the past 15 years. Could it be a stub? Thanks for any more guidance you can offer. Bodysurfinyon (talk) 13:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew_E_Checkley

Would you mind taking a look at

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Andrew_E_Checkley

I responded to a query from the editor at OTRS – I don't like nominating an article for AfD in such cases, so thought you seemed to be on a user space review roll – if you are going through them in alphabetical order and want to wait until it comes up in rotation, that's fine.--S Philbrick (Talk) 13:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:07:15, 25 January 2016 review of submission by Wdaellenbach

Wdaellenbach (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Chris Rivers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

More sources from credible sources have been added in order to coopt the news article regarding Chris RIvers winning two major Toronto music awards and should qualify him as a notable artist. Numerous sources have been added and information improved upon and his page should be created.

Berenstain Bears (Atari 2600 game)

SwisterTwister Thank you for taking the time to review the article Draft:Berenstain Bears (Atari 2600 game). I am disappointed, however, that you found this article to not meet the notability threshold. As a highly collectible video game, and one that has been covered in many books and magazine articles (as shown in the references), I am wondering what more you find necessary to approve this article. Many revisions have taken place to expand the article and remove any information or references from non-reputable sources or wiki pages, with all seven current references being published books or magazine/journal articles. As a start-class entry, I believe the article to be well-sourced, accurate, and definitely notable both in the world of video game collecting as well as children's literature. Any additional feedback you could provide would be appreciated. Darb02 (talk) 02:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:51:09, 26 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by MESA po

MESA po (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Malaria Eradication Research Agenda (malERA) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Following-up on the feedback received on a draft article

Dear Sir,

Thank you very much for reviewing my article about the MalERA Eradication Research Agenda. Your feedback has been very useful. I have updated the reference,adding citations that are independent of the subject. I would be grateful if you could have a look at it and let me know whether this is acceptable.

Thank you very much

MESA po (talk) 08:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:41:21, 26 January 2016 review of submission by Beshestephens

Beshestephens (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Cara McCollum (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Every Miss New Jersey since 2008 has their own individual page - can you explain why this titleholder is less notable than the rest? Beshestephens (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:51:31, 26 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Haitimovieawards

Haitimovieawards (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Motion Picture Association of Haiti, Inc. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

Our article was recently declined. I believe it's by mistake, because we are not infringing any copyright materials. The information is coming straight from our website www.mpahaiti.org. The article is about our organization I'm sorry for any confusions or misunderstandings.

We would appreciate if you could accept our article/page on Wikipedia. Thank you for your understanding.

Haitimovieawards (talk) 18:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:51:31, 26 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Haitimovieawards

Haitimovieawards (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Motion Picture Association of Haiti, Inc. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

Our article was recently declined. I believe it's by mistake, because we are not infringing any copyright materials. The information is coming straight from our website www.mpahaiti.org. The article is about our organization I'm sorry for any confusions or misunderstandings.

We would appreciate if you could accept our article/page on Wikipedia. Thank you for your understanding.

Haitimovieawards (talk) 18:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04:47:22, 27 January 2016 review of submission by Lemurian.in

Lemurian.in (talk · contribs)
- Draft:XTees.com (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister, This is my first article on Wikipedia. Sorry that I couldn't meet our norms, the sources as far referred are main newspaper and magazines here in India. How can I improve my article from here. Whether need to get more reliable citation? Please guide me in right direction to complete the article in a better way. And Interested to contribute much more.

Lemurian.in See my comment at the draft, the article simply needs any further available sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you SwisterTwister. I have not used some references I collected in Article. I will update and let you know. Lemurian 05:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister. I have improved the article, please take a look into and also collected a book link and newspaper cuttings. Also will include that soon. Lemurian.in (talk) 04:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC) Hi SwisterTwister. I have improved article with some more sources collected. Is it good to submit now? Please guide me regarding. Lemurian.in (talk) 07:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05:19:07, 27 January 2016 review of submission by Racinggold

Racinggold (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Racing Gold Limited (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I am very new ti submitting a wiki article, i would like to get more clarity as to why my submission was declined as i feel the independent sources shown in the references is adequate however i feel i have not tagged then correctly with the right ref tags and this is your reason for declining the article?

All references are independent for this article.

Tom. Racinggold (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Racinggold See WP:Your first article and WP:Referencing for beginners, the article will need further available information and sources overall to be acceptable. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05:23:19, 27 January 2016 review of submission by Kasturika

Kasturika (talk · contribs)
- Draft:M. O. Joseph (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Added 2 external links to confirm notability.

Kasturika Unfortunately, that's still not enough. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06:11:28, 27 January 2016 review of submission by Percocetpistolpete

Percocetpistolpete (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Brandon Scoop B Robinson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have added links, and tried to source out as many links as I can without adding spam. It seems that this person is notable, and should have a wikipedia page, but maybe my process of creating it wasn't done right the first time. This person is on CBS Radio in the greater NYC area, he is often on television, see links and sources and additions I have made. Now I had to link this person's youtube page which you can see HERE, but that is because I couldn't find the direct link or any link that would have it on TV. If such a link/source does exist, maybe you can help me find it.

What's funny is as I was working on this, kind of taking a break, I see him pop up on TMZ sports on my TV. So I linked the TMZ article that mentions his show, and I am waiting for the TV clip to be up so I can source that. I just thought that was ironic, lol.

Ok so he is regular guess on the Arise Network...but again, mostly seen on his own youtube as they are a TV station and run live....here is one article I found but the video links are dead

ARISE TV LINK

And here is again the clips but they are on his youtube, which I don't feel like it should be a problem since they are real clips, but should I try to get them another way?

Scoop B on Arise Youtube Link

Then he is a guest on the BEN Network Show talking about Isiah Thomas joining the Liberty as their coach. LINK

but again, his own youtube is the source....so is that a problem?

Then I found a link to the audio for when he was on ESPN Radio discussing the Hoop Hall of Fame and Alonzo Mourning ....Here is the AUDIO LINK and then here is a SHORT WRITE UP The first link went down, then back up, it was at www.CatfishHughes.com which is just a page about that person I assume.

Ok then I added his education which includes his attendance to the youth camp ran by famous Ian Eagle and Bruce Beck. He didn't just attend, but they also had a write up about him being a famous alumni which I linked and you can see I added the link to the page LINK HERE

Then he was already on the Hofstra Page but it was red meaning no wiki page, as a graduate, it is also on the last link it lists his masters degree.

Now is there anything else that I should add or that is needed for this to move forward? I understand that not every sports journalist should have a wikipedia page, but this person is constantly on TV weekly and on air with a radio show that gets stories from it picked up onto other shows for example see the Samakia Walker story....

Please advise and hopefully we can get this moving forward....then once I get all the links for the Evansville Hoosier wiki page I am working on that will be another story LOL!

thanks

edit: added a link to the Evansville Hoosier page I am working on because that is starting to get hard lol!

(Percocetpistolpete (talk) 06:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Please see that page for more information regarding creation of new articles and notability.

Rebuts User:SwisterTwister

Somehow, I get the feeling that this article should be notable just from the reasons you keep denying that the Blazers are not notable. Just how many multimillion dollar judgements have to be awarded by the courts for discrimination before you get it? (They did get the first, that alone should get by the issue of notability.) Would you care to see the list of discrimination judgements from 1973 to now? Robco311 (talk) 17:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help!

Thanks for for your help and guidance. You have been great!

Sleaver2 (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:57:05, 8 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Writingasaghost

Writingasaghost (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Barbera Caffe Co. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Writingasaghost (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

<-- 1. This company has a significant presence in the EU, Middle East and Asian markets through wholesale coffee sales and through company owned and franchised coffee houses. 2. The company's heads have made important contributions to the study of coffee roasting, including publishing articles in scientific journals. 3. The company's coffee has been recommended to consumers through off-line consumer magazines. Because other recommendations of the coffee are through blogs (which do not qualify as acceptable sources), they have not been included in the article. 4. Its partnerships with foreign businesses have been reported on in both English and non-English industry journals/newspapers (online or off-line). 5. With Google translate, it is possible--if you possess a copy of the offline magazines--to understand the nature of each article. The articles cited are not mere mention. I could upload the PDFs to Wikipedia, however, I can't do so until the article leaves draft. The PDFs are of published articles, so I can only upload them using fair-use copyright rules.

While I have included references which are 'mere mentions' and don't weigh in, I understand that consumer magazines do qualify under the rules. While "The National Enquirer" would not, I believe a European equivalent to "Good Housekeeping" should.

I included the 'mere mentions' primarily to back up the coverage of their expansion.

I recognize this article requires ongoing improvements, however, I believe this draft qualifies for entry at the lowest level permissible.-->

Writingasaghost (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

schools

Is it really your intent to challenge the compromise on schools? I'd think that we have quite sufficient articles that really need deletion to waste time on debating what would quite literally be tens of thousands of these. Before the compromise, we sometimes had 10 or 15 of these every day,about a 20% increase in the number of afds to consider. The results weren't even deleting the worst of them--the results were essentially random in terms of importance or quality, depending on who showed up and how strongly the article was attacked & defended. DGG ( talk ) 19:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I thought boarding schools were not applicable for notability from the schools notability. SwisterTwister talk 20:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21:15:43, 8 February 2016 review of submission by CommsPro123

CommsPro123 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Xavient Information Systems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello:

I submitted the page "Xavient Information Systems" a few weeks ago and it was denied on the grounds of a lack of notability. However, I understand notability is dependent upon having significant coverage in several reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Based on these criteria, Xavient's page should be reconsidered regarding notability, as

a) we provided 10 references, showing sufficient "significant" coverage and
b) the coverage is from reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

Xavient's coverage in CableFax, Investor's Business Daily and Broadband Technology Report especially should provide substantive evidence of notability, especially compared to the following companies' pages:

CableFax and Broadband Technology Report have been used as sources on multiple other company pages (CableFax: INSP (TV network), Full Channel, Blackboard Wars; Broadband Technology Report: Integrated Broadband Services, Pixelmetrix, Comcast Business) which supports the claim that Xavient's presence in these outlets constitutes a higher degree of notability than has been recognized.

Please reconsider Xavient's notability.

CommsPro123 (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CommsPro123 Hello and thanks! However, the current article is still not satisfying notability guidelines. It will also need any further available solid in-depth third-party sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 21:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister. I'm still working on the Xavient draft page but I need more help and was hoping you could direct me to a Wikipedia user who specializes in editing IT/technology pages and who would be able to provide a steadier stream of input as I continue to work on Xavient's page. I tried to use the Teahouse with little success and despite having a "Request for Adoption" sticker on my user page for several months, no one has adopted me. Could you put me in touch with an IT/Tech editor or someone who might adopt me? Thanks. CommsPro123 (talk)

Hello CommsPro123, I am an IT/Tech editor and might be able to help you a little with your article. I am fixing your refs now. Please contact me on my talk page for further discussion. Chrisw80 (talk) 08:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I need you to submit this article with a salted title to the AfC process, R. J. Helton.The Cross Bearer (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Cross Bearer Hmm, the article would seem acceptable but I still question whether he's solidly independently notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How do I submit the draft to AfC?The Cross Bearer (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Cross Bearer Adding {{AFC submission}} but I still believe the article is questionable. SwisterTwister talk 07:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion is one I respect, while I believe he meets notability in multiple ways (e.g.: charts, reviews, stories, another encyclopedia), and thank you for the direction regarding the submission process, love you editor have a great editing day.The Cross Bearer (talk) 07:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:15:49, 9 February 2016 review of submission by Force2006

Force2006 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Andreá Cassar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I am new to the editing process and am viewing this entry ("Andreá Cassar). It appears there are many third party sources validating the material contained within the entry. Why was this entry rejected? And, if because of sources, why aren't the sources listed valid? --- If that is the case, what are better sources I should look out for when editing/viewing entries on Wikipedia? Thank you. - Andrew

Question

Are you a wikipedia bot?

THE PALE EMPEROR XV I am not.

SwisterTwister talk 22:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article appears to have been taken down

Hi,

I previously submitted an article for publication, Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold, and it was created in December (you sent me a message notifying me on Dec. 16). The article seems to have been taken down, as that link now redirects to Drug-eluting stent. I didn't receive a notice that it was being taken down or redirected. Is there something that can be done to bring the page back? Thank you for your help. Tom at Manifest (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Hi, i'd made the page named [Dreams (2016 film)]. So please help me by adding some useful words and poster in it.

White_pixelization

Hi there, I've just been linked to the AFD for this article, I didn't realise there had been a second one after the first AFD was decided to keep. Anyway, I've provided a credible source and request to keep the article perhaps with a better outside of Sweden rewrite of the article (Which I'm willing to do) as this is done also in Germany. In Germany it is done to keep anonymity of suspects prior to conviction as per German Law. There isn't really a race aspect to it, more just to make every pixelated person look the same regardless. The fact is even prior to the refugee crisis, images were pixelated in this was for exactly the same reason, not to protect refugee crimes as the original article claimed. Thanks in advance. Projectmayhem666 (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've compiled a list of sources mainly from Germany so I'll be able to rewrite and fully source the article this weekend. I will give until Friday for you to reconsider the deletion on the basis I will rewrite and fully reference the article with official sources, mainly the 12.1 Press Code section 5 which deals with keeping the identities of perpetrators completely anonymous from any profiling, including racial profiling. After Friday I'll be putting in an undeletion request to userfy the page so I can completely rewrite it. Projectmayhem666 (talk) 20:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Markpedia1=

Hello, A couple of days ago you left comments on my article informing me that I should improve my citations. I've just done that recently and I invite you to check it once more. Thank you very much!≈≈≈≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markpedia1 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:30:30, 10 February 2016 review of submission by Jackieloebach

Jackieloebach (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Virtual High School (Ontario) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would just like some clarification regarding why the references provided are insufficient. Some of the references listed include government websites and a published book. The newspapers listed are well-renowned publishers. Any direction or insight you can provide would be much appreciated. Thanks!

I'm going to respond to this, as I tend to specialize in school notability questions. We have a standard practice that any degree-granting high school or secondary school can have an article. It is not clear from the article whether this is indeed a degree-granting school, or a school that offers individual remote courses. I've examined the school's website in detail, and I finally did find the [46] and it does. The article needs to clarify this. It also needs some numbers: I see some approximate numbers on the web site for the number of people taking courses, but not for the number of people completing their full high school program atthe school. If nobody or almost nobody has done so, there may need to be a discussion. DGG ( talk ) 21:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:48:56, 10 February 2016 review of submission by Swelch12

Swelch12 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Artec 3D (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello - I would like to better understand why my submission (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Artec_3D) was rejected. The feedback says that the references do not adequately show the subject's notability, but I've included references from LiveScience, NBC News, Forbes, ComputerWorld and Desktop Engineering. I would really appreciate any additional information you could share on how I can improve my submission and have it be accepted.

Swelch12 Looking atthe references, they show much mor clearly the notability fo the product than the company. I'd rewrite it in that manner using the article title Shapify. DGG ( talk ) 21:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gmuhwezi/African Virtual University

You apparently didn't notice we have an article on the subject, which he wrote. I deleted as G6, , as a preliminary draft with an existing article. Upon seeing an apparently promotional draft, it's always good to see whether there is also an article. I haven't checked it. DGG ( talk ) 19:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stuck in review mode?

Hey there,

I noticed my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Adrienne_Kress seems to be stuck in review mode for the past few days. It's says to say something after 12 hours.

I was wondering if you were waiting for me to change something? The review notification asks me not to change anything until after the review.

Thanks!

Sleaver2 (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re Agarwal Packers and Movers - thank you

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for taking the time to give some feedback. I will persevere with the article then. Ravi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alokibees (talk • contribs) 23:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abradable Powder Coatings

Alrirght, so can we get this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Abradable_Powder_Coatings) up finally. It's more than ready to be up and literally every detail has been sourced. Would be swell to have it done so i can move on to my next project/contribution :) Fauxtoez (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Fauxtoez[reply]

10:43:47, 12 February 2016 review of submission by DeanHamer

DeanHamer (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Kumu Hina (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please re-review KUMU HINA asap. It's been nominated for a major media award (GLAAD) and put forward for two Emmy Awards (by PBS). It's the only major PBS film WITHOUT a Wiki this season. Very strange given the major presence in the media word. Mahalo.

Deletion of userspace pages

Hello, David. I've been deleting userspace pages which you have tagged for speedy deletion. I see that you have been systematically working through the alphabet, and are now up to H. You must have put quite a lot of work into checking huge numbers of pages, and you are to be congratulated on dealing with a lot of junk which really should have been deleted years ago, but nobody put in the work of checking. In my opinion, some of your most useful work is tagging unambiguously promotional pages. However, I am less sure about the value of tagging a page "because it is a userspace draft containing only the default Article Wizard text, and the user who created the page has been inactive for at least one year". The huge number of pages you have tagged take up a considerable amount of administrator time, which could be spent on other things, and while in my opinion the time is worth spending when it is removing such things as spam, I am less convinced that taking time away from other work in order to delete essentially empty pages is a good idea. You may therefore like to consider leaving those pages. Obviously, it's up to you, but that's a suggestion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:35:11, 12 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Kantonus

Kantonus (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Netop Remote Control (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Submission declined for Netop Remote Control

Hi SwisterTwister,

Some time ago you declined the submission of this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Netop_Remote_Control&redirect=no with the reason of lack of notability. I just want to point out that Netop Remote Control has been on the market for around 30 years and is one of the most widespread remote access tools in the world. Netop has millions of users and and cannot be regarded as not notable. Netop Remote Control is far more notable than most of the tools you can find on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_remote_desktop_software!

Many IT magazines and IT related web pages have produced reviews and comparisons where Netop Remote Control has been regarded as one of the best remote access tools. So I should think that it is fair to say that Netop Remote Control can be listed among all the other tools for remote access.

I should be happy to do whatever I can to improve the article and have more people contribute and elevate its content.

Thanks Kantonus Kantonus (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delta-convergence

Hello! You have patrolled the page Delta-convergence that I edited, and it remains tagged as orphan, despite having other pages pointing to it. Is there anything I can do to remedy the situation? Cyril CyrilTintarev (talk) 11:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CyrilTintarev Now removed. SwisterTwister talk 19:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: The above text was added manually to the bottom of the previous section without a section header. I added a section header just to help the user out so the comment does not become lost. I will also point the user to help on using Talk pages correctly. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 15:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Inigo Jones". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[2] [Inigo_Jones "Inigo Jones"]. {{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[3] {{Cite Inigo_Jones }}

[4] Barelvi school views SC fatwa order with caution Mrigank Tiwari,TNN | Jul 8, 2014, 09.41PM "Ala Hazrat's descendent Maulana Akhtar Raza Khan is the head of muftis across the country."

[5] Mufti Muhammad Akhtar Raza Khan Qaadiri Al-Azhari themuslim500.com

[6] [1] "Of them Barelvis are estimated to constitute between 80 to 85 % against 15 to 20 % Deobandis, 4% Ahle Hadith and Jamaat-e-Islami."

[7] [2] "By one estimate, in Pakistan, the Shias are 18%, ismailis 2%, Ahmediyas 2%, Barelvis 50%, Deobandis 20%, Ahle Hadith 4%, and other minorities 4%".

[8] tag is missing the closing

[kalmbach1-9] Gudrun Kalmbach: Tag der Mathematik. Begleithefte, Universität Ulm, 1985–2002

[kalmbach2-10] Tagungsbände 1-27 zu MINT (Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften, Technik). (herausgegeben mit dem Editorial Board: O. Baumgärtner, R. Berger, W. Brübach, A. Dvurecenskij, M. Grimm, O. Grosek, W. Hauptvogel, P. Hitzler, F. Houdek, V. Janis, G. Kalmbach, F. J. Klingen, O. Lange, B. Riecan, Z. Riecanova), Aegis-Verlag, Ulm und MINT Verlag, Bad Wörishofen 1997–2013

[11] "Inigo Jones". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[12] [Inigo_Jones "Inigo Jones"]. {{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[13] {{Cite Inigo_Jones }}

[14] Barelvi school views SC fatwa order with caution Mrigank Tiwari,TNN | Jul 8, 2014, 09.41PM "Ala Hazrat's descendent Maulana Akhtar Raza Khan is the head of muftis across the country."

[15] Mufti Muhammad Akhtar Raza Khan Qaadiri Al-Azhari themuslim500.com

[16] [3] "Of them Barelvis are estimated to constitute between 80 to 85 % against 15 to 20 % Deobandis, 4% Ahle Hadith and Jamaat-e-Islami."

[17] [4] "By one estimate, in Pakistan, the Shias are 18%, ismailis 2%, Ahmediyas 2%, Barelvis 50%, Deobandis 20%, Ahle Hadith 4%, and other minorities 4%".

[18] tag is missing the closing

[kalmbach1-19] Gudrun Kalmbach: Tag der Mathematik. Begleithefte, Universität Ulm, 1985–2002

[kalmbach2-20] Tagungsbände 1-27 zu MINT (Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften, Technik). (herausgegeben mit dem Editorial Board: O. Baumgärtner, R. Berger, W. Brübach, A. Dvurecenskij, M. Grimm, O. Grosek, W. Hauptvogel, P. Hitzler, F. Houdek, V. Janis, G. Kalmbach, F. J. Klingen, O. Lange, B. Riecan, Z. Riecanova), Aegis-Verlag, Ulm und MINT Verlag, Bad Wörishofen 1997–2013

[1]

[2]

[3]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[1]

[2]

[3]