User talk:Sujaydeo

Welcome!

Hello, Sujaydeo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 15:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bmgi india (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Generally a subsidiary is not afford its own article. If BMGI is notable it needs its own article. The Indian subsidiary, almost certainly not Please consider writing the broader article, certainly first.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sujaydeo/Bmgi india and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 15:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sujaydeo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 15:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BMGI (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BMGI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BMGI (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BMGI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:30, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:BMGI has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:BMGI. Thanks! /wia /tlk 15:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BMGI (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BMGI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 16:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you are working under a misunderstanding about the issues here. Providing a link to reference six-sigma doesn't help overall. Six sigma and several other terms are jargon business speak and are often used to confuse and make something sound important. This doesn't work on Wikipedia. Either explain the terms in simple language or better still omit them completely. If the company has no notability without these buzz-words, then clearly the company has no notability. Incidentally a consultancy company does not " consult its clients" it may however provide "business consultancy services to its clients". Both phrases are weasel words in the they don't actually say what these services are but at least the second version is doing it in the right direction. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 10:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BMGI (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BMGI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Breakthrough Management Group International (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Unfortunately what you have done is bomb the article with references that are not suitable. First, if you say "X founded the company" the references have to verify that -- and they don't, they just say that he's an officer at the company. You can't do that. You cannot use press releases (BusinessWire), and you should not use references that merely quote an officer of the company or that simply name the company. See wp:corp for the policies for companies. Every place where you have more than one reference, select the best one and remove the rest. When reviewers say that you need reliable sources they mean sources that meet this: wp:rs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 00:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International

Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 00:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 00:40, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On signatures

Hey! I just wanted to let you know that you should generally place your signatures at the end of the comments like this:

This is an example comment. --~~~~

Thanks, Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]