User talk:Lukog

Welcome!

Hello, Lukog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Gokullan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Beloved Freak 09:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gokullan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gokullan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Beloved Freak 09:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Your addition to Gokullan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Beloved Freak 09:12, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gokulan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gokulan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steamroller Assault (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Tiruvalla. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 03:02, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Babu Thiruvalla

The article Babu Thiruvalla has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Karthik Nadar (talk) 12:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gokulan

The article Gokulan has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Karthik Nadar (talk) 12:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gokulan

Please note that text on Wikipedia must be available to be freely redistributed, reused and built upon by anyone, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and, except where otherwise noted, the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). It doesn't matter if you own the copyright to the text you are repeatedly adding. It is currently not compatible with Wikipedia requirements. Please see here for details. Steamroller Assault (talk) 12:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gokulan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gokulan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steamroller Assault (talk) 13:00, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Gokulan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. v/r - T P 15:46, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gokulan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gokulan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pichpich (talk) 02:54, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Gokulan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayurveda eyecare

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ayurveda eyecare, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thebestofall007 (talk) 07:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Babu Thiruvalla, you may be blocked from editing. Cyan Gardevoir ^{(used EDIT!)} 21:11, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 17:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Dr.Gokulan B G/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talk:Dr.Gokulan B G/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — kikichugirl ^oh hello! 00:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sudarshanam netra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sudarshanam netra, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ninney (talk) 02:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Babu Thiruvalla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Babu Thiruvalla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babu Thiruvalla until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ninney (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your e-mail

I received your e-mail, but I'm writing back on your userpage so that the response can be seen by others. This way they know that you've had some sort of response.

Recently you created an article for Sudarshanam netra, which was deleted for being unambiguously promotional. You made two requests at REFUND, one of which appeared to have been made after you expressed understanding over the deletion.

Part of the issue with the article was that while it started off as an article about the hospital, it quickly turned into an article about one of the physicians that works there. The way you've signed comments gives off the impression that you're that physician and that you're writing about yourself. Writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. This made me look a little closer at your deleted edits, which shows that prior to making an article about the hospital, you tried making an article about yourself at Gokulan and at Talk:Dr.Gokulan. Since you've started actively editing about yourself lately, I've protected the first to keep it from being re-created at this point in time.

No one is saying that you cannot create an article about the hospital, only that you should create it at WP:AfC and that the article should only contain information about the hospital. It's extremely inappropriate to add lengthy sections about yourself in the article, especially as this can come across like you trying to get around the earlier deletions of the autobiographies. These earlier articles are not going to be restored because they're very promotional and would need to be completely re-written to take the promotional content out. The articles also had some issues with flow and grammar, so they'd need re-writing for clarity as well.

When you write the AfC draft you need to make sure that you avoid WP:PEACOCK words and WP:PUFFERY that you'd typically see on a press release. This can be difficult to do if you have a conflict of interest because your first inclination will be to try to make the article as positive as possible. It's understandable, but it's still not permitted on Wikipedia. I have to warn you: I'm mildly considering blocking you as a promotional editor. You've been here for years, during which time you've had several messages posted on your talk page about adding promotional content and other various issues. I'm aware that these aren't the same thing as someone leaving a custom message for you, but it's also expected that at some point in the last seven years that you'd have asked more questions or checked out the various links about the policies over promotional edits. I think that you may mean well, but I'm just not entirely sure that you can edit neutrally about things you have a COI with, since this is a problem you've had since you signed up in 2009. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Tokyo girl 79 for the personal point by point reply.

I agree the article SHOULD NOT BE PERSONAL PROMOTING. i have always tried to convey the message of ayurveda ophthalmology which is upcoming Sharon stove about more than 2 decades and me happened to be a pioneer pivot in this movement naturally there were mentions amor my experience and personal achievements which was added only to explain the real theme behind it. How ever if you feel to be re written am happy to do so. .i believe i could Ashdon stay with the title sudarshanam netra. ..the links which were given was authentic and you never seems to mention about it Thank you Dr. Gokulan

You can start re-writing it in the draft space as was stated above. The way to begin this process is to go to WP:AFC. There will be a large button that states "Click here to create an article now!". After clicking that you will go through several prompts. You'll need to click the appropriate links, namely that the article does not have a page on Wikipedia and that you have good sourcing. At the end you'll be asked to insert the name of the new draft article. Make sure that you insert this in the field for the draft article rather than for the mainspace, otherwise the article will likely be speedy deleted again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's so kind of you Tokyo girl 79..hope to work over well this time. .. Thanks once again Dr. Gokulan

I have updated another title named 'Ayurveda Eyecare India' in the drafts for approval with resource links and expansions mentioning about Ayurveda ophthalmology practice in Kerala in post-independent India. Thank you Dr.Gokulan

Problems with upload of File:Sudarshanam-Netra-Chikitsalayam-logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sudarshanam-Netra-Chikitsalayam-logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jackmcbarn was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lukog/Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lukog/Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Lukog, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lukog/Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 19:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Jackmcbarn, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayurveda Eyecare India (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ayurveda Eyecare India and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. Also make sure youhave signed in first, it is not a good idea to edit from your ISP address.. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media, Youtube and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. You had a list of bare urls at the bottom, but non in-text citations so we can't tell what fact each reference was supporting. Put your references in the the text following the fact each supports using <ref>[url description]</ref>. Then {{reflist}} at the end will automatically generate a numbered list. Some of your refs, like YouTube, clearly don't meet our requirements anyway
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.

Your article seems designed to promote the Netra Foundations clinics, with no mention of other clinics. Either don't mention any, or be fair in your coverage.
Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: at Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam is aimed at cleansing the eyes in a natural way to prevent Allergic disorders of eye and is soothing... is pioneer in the revitalizing effort... showcased to western world
you then link to videos presented by the business's Chief Physician.

there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. that's particularly the case when they are spamlinks.

If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. That's particularly the case if you are employed directly or indirectly by the foundation or the company. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lukog. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lukog|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Please do not edit further until you answer this message. If you want to try again, I will post a modified version of the deleted text to a user subpage, just let me know, but answer the COI question as well Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC) I am not a PAID writer or paid advocate for the firm. I have tried to promote an idea revived in India to the world. I see lot lot many other firms come up in Wikipedia with such advocacy what you meant in my case. There may be mistakes in placing the links. I had shown national daily report which is neutral and un paid as a source. ihad laid source from government of India Department of Ayush showing my name as the Guru in Ayurveda Ophthalmology as a RELIABLE source. I have listed couple of film production units website who are abroad(France & Germany mentioning about my work in their films.They are NOT PAID advocates any way..there are numerous other articles in Wikipedia I see every day with lesser or none such reference base...STILL THEY FIND PLACE HERE...how... Deletion is no way a solution for a sincere effort done with so many hours of editing... Thank you Lukog ````[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

117.218.251.179 (talk) 06:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam has been recently rejected for the reason 'in adequate reference for notability'...I wonder how Government of India(RAV New Delhi) recognition as GURU cited with reference become in adequate to show the significance & notability of the institution..Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam has been chosen out of many hundred doctors in India to select as Master who have unique experience in each field of medicine in Ayurveda. The movies link given is of a renowned award winning performer/ director Pan Nalin and their association with Sudarshanam is also chosen from so many sources in India. Monalisa Production in france is independent body who have come to Sudarshanam for shooting the significance of Honey Therapy which was due to its notability in the global scenario. Nevertheless there are many other wiki articles I saw in similar field not having your adequate notability references criteria.

Kindly comment Lukog ````

AfC notification: User:Lukog/Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Lukog/Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 06:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam

Hello, Lukog. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sudarshanam Netra Chikitsalayam".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 14:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Lukog/Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri

Hello, Lukog. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Vaidyamadom Valiya Narayanan Namboodiri".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:13, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lukog/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Lukog/sandbox

Hello, Lukog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 16:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]