User talk:Markpedia1

Welcome!

Hello, Markpedia1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 19:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niama Reisser Company (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niama Reisser Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niama Reisser Company (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niama Reisser Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 13:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Markpedia1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 13:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niama Reisser Company (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niama Reisser Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 02:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How to write a Wikipedia article

hi Markpedia1. I see you are having some trouble getting your article created. I wanted to give you some advice about how to write an article in Wikipedia.

1) forget everything you know about the company.

2) Remember that you are writing to educate people. To provide a reference - an enduring reference, that will make as much sense now, as 10 years from now. Not a promotional piece or brochure or "what's new". A reference article that is part of an encyclopedia. (If you are not clear what Wikipedia is for, please read WP:NOT)

3) read WP:RS and WP:INDY

4) Go out and find all the reliable, independent sources you can about the company. I am not talking about passing mentions, but sources that actually discuss the company. Get all of them, not just the good ones.

5) Read WP:Golden Rule and WP:NOTABILITY, and try to decide if you have enough independent, reliable sources, with which to create an article. If the answer is "no", you can stop there and save yourself and everybody else time. And if your boss or a client is asking you to write this you can tell them {According to Wikipedia policy we are not covered enough in what they call 'reliable sources" to have a Wikipedia article at this time") To go forward, you should have, oh three or four independent sources that really discuss the company. Assuming you have enough...

6) Go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies/Guidelines and read what they say there, about how to structure a Wikipedia article about a company.

7) Read the sources you have found (make yourself actually read them, although you know plenty about the company.) You have to let the sources guide you. Think about what they say. What do they give the most space to discussing? Whatever that is, should get the most space in the article. (This is what we call WP:WEIGHT)

8) Start writing the body of the article, summarizing the sources and following the sections suggested in the guideline, to the extent that you have sources for them. (it is ok to skip sections) Do not write anything that is not in a source. Add citations as you go, so you know that every sentence comes from one of the sources.

9) In terms of word choice, be super careful to write neutrallly. Think "vanilla", not "raspberry". Plain vanilla, no color. Your goal here is to educate, not sell.

10) When you are done writing, review it, and make sure that the WEIGHT reflects the weight given to various subjects in the sources.

11) now write the lead of the article, summarizing the stuff in the body. (see WP:LEAD.

12) add infobox, add any external links that you like (make sure to read WP:EL and especially WP:ELNO.)

When you are done with all that, you should have a well-sourced, NPOV, nonpromotional reference article about the company, that will get through AfC. I hope that makes sense! Jytdog (talk) 07:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niama Reisser Company (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

There is still no evidence that the firm is notable. The references show that it has patented and announced prototype products; it does not show that it has actually manufactured them in production quantities. Patents do not give notability unless they are successfully exploited.

Too many of the references are from its own site, and one WP article cannot be used as a reference for another--it can just be linked.

I did considerable clean up on style, though a few references still need to be expanded according to WP:REFBEGIN.

Of the various references, Motor-Journalseems the best source. Since it is in German, I checked carefully, and find it supports that an engine has been designed, and gives expected specifications, but it does not indicate that even samples of the engine or automobile have ever been made.

Since the engine as described would be rather revolutionary, I would expect that when it becomes notable there will be an abundance of excellent detailed sources in several languages. At that point,there will be a possibility for an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niama Reisser Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 01:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niama Reisser Company (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tvx1 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The issues have not been sufficiently addressed. There is still no proof that the engines exist beyond the patent. Additionally, Youtube is not an acceptable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niama Reisser Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

T v x1 21:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niama Reisser Company (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only new secondary source is a local news piece that reiterates what's already been said. Coverage is about the claim and the prospect only.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niama Reisser Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ringbang (talk) 19:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niama Reisser Company (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In the most recent submission, one reference to the company's website was added.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niama Reisser Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ringbang (talk) 19:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niama Reisser Company (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would not resubmit again until the company has advanced and that will likely take a few years until I encourage resubmitting again. The thing simply is that it's still too soon and the listed coverage is also not convincing, any additional coverage listed afterwards would likely also not help unfortunately thus waiting is better than risking deletion later.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niama Reisser Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Niama Reisser Company

Draft:Niama Reisser Company, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Niama Reisser Company and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Niama Reisser Company during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 00:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shawn McNulty

Hello Markpedia1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shawn McNulty for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. L337p4wn ^{Talk to me!} 06:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Shawn McNulty

added links pointing to Acrylic, Saatchi, St. John's University, St. John’s University and Collegeville

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]