User talk:Robertsan

The name 'Robertsan' may be available

Robertsan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Hello Robertsan1. I saw your posting at WP:AN. So far as I can tell, 'Robertsan' is an available name. If you are still interested in using that name on the English Wikipedia, you could try creating an account with that name. If it doesn't work, ask for assistance. Since you have few contributions here, going through WP:CHU seems unnecessary. EdJohnston (talk) 01:33, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I tried ist again. This text appeared: Login error. Username entered already in use. Please choose a different name. Can you help? was logged out --Robertsan1 (talk) 06:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Go to WP:CHUS and request that your account name be changed. These requests are handled by bureaucrats, who are experts in creating new accounts for people. Be sure to mention that you're known as 'Robertsan' on other Wikipedias. The new name is probably being flagged for similarity to an existing name. The bureaucrats can override this check. EdJohnston (talk) 15:30, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The user "Robertsan" already exists. As the account has no edits, it can be usurped; your request has been moved to Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations. But please note, if you are open about which accounts are yours, then there is no sock puppetry going on. Kingturtle (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The sockpuppetry thing came about by some IP that made an edit to his page. Not sure what that's all about. I've moved the request to Wikipedia:CHUU#Robertsan and notified the target user. –xeno^talk 18:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks fot that. I guess the IPs note was a payback for my edit in Bodo Sperling, see the discussion page there. For we had the exactly same situation in German WP, having troubles with that aricle there since it started. (self promotion in a very aggressive way). So if the CHU works, it's okay, if not, I will be not worried because of the Kingturtles statement. Thank you for your help. --Robertsan1 (talk) 05:19, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The rename is Done. Happy editing, –xeno^talk 13:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, thank you. Kindly --Robertsan (talk) 15:10, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

There is no consensus about the changes you made in the article Christian Michelides. Some of your changes are directly wrong, others contradict even the German version praised by you. I consider your changes as vandalism and kindly ask you to pull back and restore the version everyone here agreed upon. Yours sincerely, McWien (talk) 21:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My global edits everyone can see and evaluate. I am working in German WP and very little in English, in German WQ I am Administrator and I have never been blocked in all subjects I was involved. You are socking and a man on a mission, being helped by your fans. So what? I know who you are and there is only my good manners that forbid me to tell it. --Robertsan (talk) 23:51, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Trio Bienal, from its old location at User:Robertsan/sandbox. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae ★ /tlk 15:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help, --Robertsan (talk) 15:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trio Bienal (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trio Bienal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trio Bienal (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

The problem that I see is that this "bienal" has taken place only once, so it is really too soon to know if it will become an important art show. There are many articles, but a show like this generates a lot of publicity. That doesn't mean that it has staying power. I think this is too soon.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trio Bienal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Robertsan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Eteethan. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Draft:Trio Bienal with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eteethan(talk) 19:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trio Bienal (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This is perhaps the best draft article I've ever declined. I've looked at it several times over the past few weeks, and always hoped that another reviewer would take it on. But to leave it languishing like this I think is worse. It's well-written, well-sourced, and formatted properly (except for the citations - see WP:CIT). The problem is that the early citations are all announcements about the upcoming event, which fall under routine coverage. The citations after the event are all from non-independent sources. If there are plans for this event to happen again, and coverage starts up, then that's the time for the article. As of now, appears to be WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trio Bienal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trio Bienal (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tvx1 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Adding one extra source does not address the raised concerns. There still is a lack of third-party and non-routine sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trio Bienal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

T v x1 19:38, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Trio Bienal

Hello, Robertsan. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Trio Bienal".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 17:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]